Date post: | 03-Apr-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | samknight2009 |
View: | 220 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 45
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
1/45
MAPAC 2006 1
Assessing Leadership:
Who is a leader andhow do we know it?
Tom Mitchell, U. of Baltimore
Division of Applied Behavioral Sciences
http://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch
410 837 5348
mailto:[email protected]://home.ubalt.edu/tmitchhttp://home.ubalt.edu/tmitchmailto:[email protected]7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
2/45
MAPAC 2006 2
Why we need to know
Selection
- hire new managers (first line to mid level)
Promotion- succession planning and staffing
Development
- training and coaching- diagnose problems
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
3/45
MAPAC 2006 3
Who are they?
Definitions of leadership:
Person who motivates others to perform well
Directing & coordinating group activities (Fiedler, 67)
Influencing others to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2004)
Building networked relationships to enhance cooperation (Day, 2001)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
4/45
MAPAC 2006 4
Conceptual Distinctions
Born or bred?
Leader Emergence vs. Effectiveness
Leadership vs. Management /supervision
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
5/45
MAPAC 2006 5
Conceptual Distinctions
Leadership v. Management
Power sources (French & Raven, 59) Position v. Personal power
Power source: Power influence:
1. Reward: give rewards
2. Coercive punish
3. Legitimate demand
4. Referent identifies with supervisor
5. Expert knowledge & expertise
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
6/45
MAPAC 2006 6
Conceptual Distinctions
Leadership v. Management
Power source: Power:
1. Reward: give rewards 2. Coercive punish
3. Legitimate demand
4. Referent identifies with supervisor
5. Expert knowledge & expertise
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
7/45
MAPAC 2006 7
Leader vs. Manager(Kotter, 90)
Establish Directionvision - set strategy
Plan / Budget
resources time lines
Align People
team building - Commitment
Organize / Staffing
establish rules - hire
Motivate & InspireInspire - empower
Control / Problem SolveIncentives take action
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
8/45
MAPAC 2006 8
Theories: History (short)
Trait(20s 30s) -> dead end E.g. height / weight / ambitious / gender
Behavioral(50s 60s: Ohio state, Fleishman & Harris, 62) Consideration / initiating structure (LOQ)
Contingency(60s 70s: U. MI; Fiedler 67) Situational leadership (Hersey & Blanchard, 77) Path -> Goal (House & Mitchell, 74)
Trait (again!) Charismatic Transformational v. transactional (Bass, 06)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
9/45
MAPAC 2006 9
Leadership: Factors and Competencies
(Jeanneret and Silzer, 1998)
Thinking skills Analyzing information
Solving problems
Work management skills Planning and organizing work Being resourceful
Interpersonal and communication skills Building networks Relating to others
Leadership skills Motivating and inspiring others Coaching and developing others
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
10/45
MAPAC 2006 10
Factors and Competencies (cont)
Motivation skills Adapting to change Showing drive and taking action
Personal factors
Demonstrating integrity and trust Modeling cultural values
Organizational skills Focusing on customers Committing to quality
Technical skills Demonstrating functional expertise Knowing the business
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
11/45
MAPAC 2006 11
Transformational Leadership
(Bass & Avolio, 2000)
Transformational Leadership
Transactional Leadership
Passive/Avoidant
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
12/45
MAPAC 2006 12
Personal traits:Transformational Leadership
Transactional leaders
Social exchange
Transformational leaders
Stimulate and Inspire
Grow and develop
Empower followers
Passive/Avoidant
MBE / Lassiez Faire
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
13/45
MAPAC 2006 13
Transformational LeaderCharacteristics
Idealized Influence Role model / emulation
Inspirational Motivation
Vision / challenging
Intellectual Stimulation Encourages creativity
Individualized Consideration Coaching / mentoring
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
14/45
MAPAC 2006 14
Assessing Leadership
Who they are (now we know)
How do we know?
Why do we need to know?
Identifying and Assessing Leaders
(assessment strategies)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
15/45
MAPAC 2006 15
Need to Identify Them
Recruitment
Selection
Succession planning (promotion)
Development
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
16/45
MAPAC 2006 16
Assessment: How to
Start with Job analysis: Id SMEs
Conduct interviews
Review job description Confirm leadership duties and KSAOs
(use factors and competencies)
Develop matrix (duties & competencies)
Document Job Analysis findings
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
17/45
MAPAC 2006 17
Assessment:Issues in Assessing
Validity & reliability
Utility (effectiveness and cost) Test portability (VG)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
18/45
MAPAC 2006 18
Assessment: Issues
Validity strategies
Content validity
Criterion related validity
Construct validity
Face validity
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
19/45
MAPAC 2006 19
Assessment: Issues
Utility
Effectiveness
Logistics
Screening or ranking
Costs
Internal: Agency Personnel
External: Vendors = $$$
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
20/45
MAPAC 2006 20
Assessment: Issues
Validity Generalization
Constructs are valid
Job analysis: JA verification
Test portability
Why re-invent the wheel?
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
21/45
MAPAC 2006 21
Assessment:Principal Traits
(Northouse, 04)
Intelligence
Self-confidence
Determination Integrity
Sociability
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
22/45
MAPAC 2006 22
Assessment:Methods
Personal History
Assessment center
Behavioral interview / Oral board handout Candidate Leadership Ratings
Written tests / inventories
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
23/45
MAPAC 2006 23
Assessment:Personal History
Supplemental application blank
References
Past performance reviews Past accomplishments
Peer assessments (promo / dev)
360 / multi-rater
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
24/45
MAPAC 2006 24
Assessment:Assessment Center
Situational interview
In-basket technique
Job simulation Leaderless Group Discussion
Leader emergence
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
25/45
MAPAC 2006 25
Assessment:Written tests/ inventories
Cognitive ability
Integrity inventories
Personality inventories Leadership ability tests
Biodata
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
26/45
MAPAC 2006 26
Assessment:Cognitive Ability
Watson-Glazer Critical Thinking Appraisal(Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace, Pub)
-> Measures: Inference Recognition of Assumptions Deduction
Interpretation (generalizing, conclusions) Evaluation of Arguments
Wonderlic Personnel Test (Wonderlic Personnel Test, Inc., 1992. 1-800 323-3742 )
-> Measures
g general intelligence (potential for development) Extensive norms
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
27/45
MAPAC 2006 27
Assessment: Integrity
Integrity tests
Overt
Personality
Hogan Personnel Selection Scale (organizational delinquency)
http://www.hoganassessments.com/
Polygraph (?)
http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
28/45
MAPAC 2006 28
Assessment:Personality Inventories
NEO-PI (Five factor model) (Costa & McRae, 92)
CPI (California Psychological Inventory) CPP (Gough)
HPI (Hogan Personality Inventory) (R. & J. Hogan)
IPIP (International Personality Item Pool) (L.Goldberg)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
29/45
MAPAC 2006 29
Five Factor Model:Big Five Personality Dimensions (C A N O E)(Barrick & Mount, 91
Conscientiousness persistence, doggedness, hardworking,dependable, thorough, and responsible.
Agreeableness
being liked, courtesy, good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, softhearted.
Neuroticism
anxiety, depression, anger worry, and insecurity.
Open to Experience
imaginative, creative, broad-minded and intelligent.
Extroversion
sociability, gregariousness, talkativeness,and activity..
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
30/45
MAPAC 2006 30
NEO-PI
NEO-PI-R (Costa & McRae, 92)
NEO Personality Inventory: Revised
Long & short version
Management report
Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR)http://www3.parinc.com/
http://www3.parinc.com/http://www3.parinc.com/7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
31/45
MAPAC 2006 31
CPI:Psychological Personality Inventory (3rded)
20 scales (approximate Big five)
2 special scales:
Managerial Potential (Mp) Leadership Potential (Lp)
Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. (CPP)
http://www.cpp.com/
http://www.cpp.com/http://www.cpp.com/7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
32/45
MAPAC 2006 32
Hogan Personality Inventory:(HPI)
7 traits: BIG Five Adjustment (Neuroticism)
Ambition / Sociability (Extraversion) Likeability (Agreeableness)
Prudence (Conscientiousness)
Intellectance & (Openness)
school success
Hogan Assessments, Inc. http://www.hoganassessments.com/
http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
33/45
MAPAC 2006 33
IPIP
IPIP International Personality Item Pool
(L.Goldberg) http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/
Five Factors:
http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/
Long version: 300 items (40-60 minutes)
Short version: 120 items (15-20 minutes)
http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
34/45
MAPAC 2006 34
Leadership Ability:Measures
Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) (Self report)
TheSupervisory Behavior Description(SBD) (used by subordinates to rate supervisor)
(E. Fleishman, Ohio State studies)
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (B. Bass, transformational Leadership)
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
35/45
MAPAC 2006 35
Leadership Ability: LOQ
Two dimensions (independent constructs)
Consideration
Concern for others
Initiating structure Task oriented
Creative Organizational Design, Inc. (COD) http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm
http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
36/45
MAPAC 2006 36
LOQ: Consideration
Relationships with subordinates characterized by:
Mutual trust
Respect for their ideas Consideration of their feelings
Warmth between manager and subordinate
High score: Good rapport and two-way communications
Low score: More impersonal in relations with group members
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
37/45
MAPAC 2006 37
LOQ: Initiating Structure
Defines own and subordinates rolestoward goal attainment
High score: Takes very active role in directing activities through
Planning
Communicating information Scheduling
Criticizing
Trying new ideas
Low score: Relatively inactivein directing activites
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
38/45
MAPAC 2006 38
LOQused for:
Training
Assessment of culture Selection
Coaching
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
39/45
MAPAC 2006 39
MLQ
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire(Bass & Avolio)
Transformational Leadership
Transactional Leadership Passive/Avoidant
Mindgarden, Inc.http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm
http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
40/45
MAPAC 2006 40
MLQ: Used for
Selection
Succession Planning
Development (3600 Feedback)
Diagnosis / coaching
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
41/45
MAPAC 2006 41
Some Vendors
CCLCenter for Creative Leadership http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx
PDIPersonnel Decisions International
http://www.personneldecisions.com
DDIDevelopment Dimensions International
http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp
Personnel Testing Council Metropolitan Washington http://www.ptcmw.org/
(I/O consulting firms)
http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ptcmw.org/http://www.ptcmw.org/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
42/45
MAPAC 2006 42
Conclusion
Because
We know who they are & Can identify them
We can
Improve Agency functioning & productivity Through effectiveness
Reduce costs Improve the bottom line
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
43/45
MAPAC 2006 43
Leadership
Comments?
Questions?
7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
44/45
MAPAC 2006 44
Online Sources:
Center for Creative Leadership http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx
Development Dimensions International (DDI) http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp
Personnel Decisions International http://www.personneldecisions.com
Hogan Personnel Selection Scale http://www.hoganassessments.com/
Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire
http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm
Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm
http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership
45/45
MAPAC 2006 45
References
Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, pub. Bass, B. & Avolio, B. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 2nd ed. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO PI Personality Inventory: NEO PI and NEO Five Factor
Inventory (NEO FFI: Professional Manual: Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.) Fiedler, F. (1967).A theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill. Fleishman, E. A. & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and
turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43-56.
French, J. R. P, & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright. (Ed.), Studies of social power ) pp. 150-157. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Jeanneret, Richard, & Silzer, Rob. (1998). Individual Psychological Assessment Predicting behavior in
organizational settings. Jossey Bass pub. Chapter 12 Shaping organizational leadership. Johnson, Jeff W., Questar Data Systems, Inc. Mineapolis, MN [email protected] (Handout for ratings leadership characteristics) Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior, 3rd 3d. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal ofContemporary Business, 3, 81-97. Kotter, J. P. (1990).A force for change: How leadership differs from management(pp. 3-8). New York: Free Press Northouse, Peter G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Sage, pub.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]