+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing Leadership

Assessing Leadership

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: samknight2009
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 45

Transcript
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    1/45

    MAPAC 2006 1

    Assessing Leadership:

    Who is a leader andhow do we know it?

    Tom Mitchell, U. of Baltimore

    Division of Applied Behavioral Sciences

    [email protected]

    http://home.ubalt.edu/tmitch

    410 837 5348

    mailto:[email protected]://home.ubalt.edu/tmitchhttp://home.ubalt.edu/tmitchmailto:[email protected]
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    2/45

    MAPAC 2006 2

    Why we need to know

    Selection

    - hire new managers (first line to mid level)

    Promotion- succession planning and staffing

    Development

    - training and coaching- diagnose problems

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    3/45

    MAPAC 2006 3

    Who are they?

    Definitions of leadership:

    Person who motivates others to perform well

    Directing & coordinating group activities (Fiedler, 67)

    Influencing others to achieve a common goal (Northouse, 2004)

    Building networked relationships to enhance cooperation (Day, 2001)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    4/45

    MAPAC 2006 4

    Conceptual Distinctions

    Born or bred?

    Leader Emergence vs. Effectiveness

    Leadership vs. Management /supervision

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    5/45

    MAPAC 2006 5

    Conceptual Distinctions

    Leadership v. Management

    Power sources (French & Raven, 59) Position v. Personal power

    Power source: Power influence:

    1. Reward: give rewards

    2. Coercive punish

    3. Legitimate demand

    4. Referent identifies with supervisor

    5. Expert knowledge & expertise

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    6/45

    MAPAC 2006 6

    Conceptual Distinctions

    Leadership v. Management

    Power source: Power:

    1. Reward: give rewards 2. Coercive punish

    3. Legitimate demand

    4. Referent identifies with supervisor

    5. Expert knowledge & expertise

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    7/45

    MAPAC 2006 7

    Leader vs. Manager(Kotter, 90)

    Establish Directionvision - set strategy

    Plan / Budget

    resources time lines

    Align People

    team building - Commitment

    Organize / Staffing

    establish rules - hire

    Motivate & InspireInspire - empower

    Control / Problem SolveIncentives take action

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    8/45

    MAPAC 2006 8

    Theories: History (short)

    Trait(20s 30s) -> dead end E.g. height / weight / ambitious / gender

    Behavioral(50s 60s: Ohio state, Fleishman & Harris, 62) Consideration / initiating structure (LOQ)

    Contingency(60s 70s: U. MI; Fiedler 67) Situational leadership (Hersey & Blanchard, 77) Path -> Goal (House & Mitchell, 74)

    Trait (again!) Charismatic Transformational v. transactional (Bass, 06)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    9/45

    MAPAC 2006 9

    Leadership: Factors and Competencies

    (Jeanneret and Silzer, 1998)

    Thinking skills Analyzing information

    Solving problems

    Work management skills Planning and organizing work Being resourceful

    Interpersonal and communication skills Building networks Relating to others

    Leadership skills Motivating and inspiring others Coaching and developing others

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    10/45

    MAPAC 2006 10

    Factors and Competencies (cont)

    Motivation skills Adapting to change Showing drive and taking action

    Personal factors

    Demonstrating integrity and trust Modeling cultural values

    Organizational skills Focusing on customers Committing to quality

    Technical skills Demonstrating functional expertise Knowing the business

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    11/45

    MAPAC 2006 11

    Transformational Leadership

    (Bass & Avolio, 2000)

    Transformational Leadership

    Transactional Leadership

    Passive/Avoidant

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    12/45

    MAPAC 2006 12

    Personal traits:Transformational Leadership

    Transactional leaders

    Social exchange

    Transformational leaders

    Stimulate and Inspire

    Grow and develop

    Empower followers

    Passive/Avoidant

    MBE / Lassiez Faire

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    13/45

    MAPAC 2006 13

    Transformational LeaderCharacteristics

    Idealized Influence Role model / emulation

    Inspirational Motivation

    Vision / challenging

    Intellectual Stimulation Encourages creativity

    Individualized Consideration Coaching / mentoring

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    14/45

    MAPAC 2006 14

    Assessing Leadership

    Who they are (now we know)

    How do we know?

    Why do we need to know?

    Identifying and Assessing Leaders

    (assessment strategies)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    15/45

    MAPAC 2006 15

    Need to Identify Them

    Recruitment

    Selection

    Succession planning (promotion)

    Development

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    16/45

    MAPAC 2006 16

    Assessment: How to

    Start with Job analysis: Id SMEs

    Conduct interviews

    Review job description Confirm leadership duties and KSAOs

    (use factors and competencies)

    Develop matrix (duties & competencies)

    Document Job Analysis findings

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    17/45

    MAPAC 2006 17

    Assessment:Issues in Assessing

    Validity & reliability

    Utility (effectiveness and cost) Test portability (VG)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    18/45

    MAPAC 2006 18

    Assessment: Issues

    Validity strategies

    Content validity

    Criterion related validity

    Construct validity

    Face validity

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    19/45

    MAPAC 2006 19

    Assessment: Issues

    Utility

    Effectiveness

    Logistics

    Screening or ranking

    Costs

    Internal: Agency Personnel

    External: Vendors = $$$

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    20/45

    MAPAC 2006 20

    Assessment: Issues

    Validity Generalization

    Constructs are valid

    Job analysis: JA verification

    Test portability

    Why re-invent the wheel?

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    21/45

    MAPAC 2006 21

    Assessment:Principal Traits

    (Northouse, 04)

    Intelligence

    Self-confidence

    Determination Integrity

    Sociability

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    22/45

    MAPAC 2006 22

    Assessment:Methods

    Personal History

    Assessment center

    Behavioral interview / Oral board handout Candidate Leadership Ratings

    Written tests / inventories

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    23/45

    MAPAC 2006 23

    Assessment:Personal History

    Supplemental application blank

    References

    Past performance reviews Past accomplishments

    Peer assessments (promo / dev)

    360 / multi-rater

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    24/45

    MAPAC 2006 24

    Assessment:Assessment Center

    Situational interview

    In-basket technique

    Job simulation Leaderless Group Discussion

    Leader emergence

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    25/45

    MAPAC 2006 25

    Assessment:Written tests/ inventories

    Cognitive ability

    Integrity inventories

    Personality inventories Leadership ability tests

    Biodata

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    26/45

    MAPAC 2006 26

    Assessment:Cognitive Ability

    Watson-Glazer Critical Thinking Appraisal(Psychological Corporation: Harcourt Brace, Pub)

    -> Measures: Inference Recognition of Assumptions Deduction

    Interpretation (generalizing, conclusions) Evaluation of Arguments

    Wonderlic Personnel Test (Wonderlic Personnel Test, Inc., 1992. 1-800 323-3742 )

    -> Measures

    g general intelligence (potential for development) Extensive norms

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    27/45

    MAPAC 2006 27

    Assessment: Integrity

    Integrity tests

    Overt

    Personality

    Hogan Personnel Selection Scale (organizational delinquency)

    http://www.hoganassessments.com/

    Polygraph (?)

    http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    28/45

    MAPAC 2006 28

    Assessment:Personality Inventories

    NEO-PI (Five factor model) (Costa & McRae, 92)

    CPI (California Psychological Inventory) CPP (Gough)

    HPI (Hogan Personality Inventory) (R. & J. Hogan)

    IPIP (International Personality Item Pool) (L.Goldberg)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    29/45

    MAPAC 2006 29

    Five Factor Model:Big Five Personality Dimensions (C A N O E)(Barrick & Mount, 91

    Conscientiousness persistence, doggedness, hardworking,dependable, thorough, and responsible.

    Agreeableness

    being liked, courtesy, good-natured, cooperative, forgiving, softhearted.

    Neuroticism

    anxiety, depression, anger worry, and insecurity.

    Open to Experience

    imaginative, creative, broad-minded and intelligent.

    Extroversion

    sociability, gregariousness, talkativeness,and activity..

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    30/45

    MAPAC 2006 30

    NEO-PI

    NEO-PI-R (Costa & McRae, 92)

    NEO Personality Inventory: Revised

    Long & short version

    Management report

    Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc. (PAR)http://www3.parinc.com/

    http://www3.parinc.com/http://www3.parinc.com/
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    31/45

    MAPAC 2006 31

    CPI:Psychological Personality Inventory (3rded)

    20 scales (approximate Big five)

    2 special scales:

    Managerial Potential (Mp) Leadership Potential (Lp)

    Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc. (CPP)

    http://www.cpp.com/

    http://www.cpp.com/http://www.cpp.com/
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    32/45

    MAPAC 2006 32

    Hogan Personality Inventory:(HPI)

    7 traits: BIG Five Adjustment (Neuroticism)

    Ambition / Sociability (Extraversion) Likeability (Agreeableness)

    Prudence (Conscientiousness)

    Intellectance & (Openness)

    school success

    Hogan Assessments, Inc. http://www.hoganassessments.com/

    http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    33/45

    MAPAC 2006 33

    IPIP

    IPIP International Personality Item Pool

    (L.Goldberg) http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/

    Five Factors:

    http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/

    Long version: 300 items (40-60 minutes)

    Short version: 120 items (15-20 minutes)

    http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/j/5/j5j/IPIP/http://ipip.ori.org/ipip/
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    34/45

    MAPAC 2006 34

    Leadership Ability:Measures

    Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) (Self report)

    TheSupervisory Behavior Description(SBD) (used by subordinates to rate supervisor)

    (E. Fleishman, Ohio State studies)

    Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) (B. Bass, transformational Leadership)

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    35/45

    MAPAC 2006 35

    Leadership Ability: LOQ

    Two dimensions (independent constructs)

    Consideration

    Concern for others

    Initiating structure Task oriented

    Creative Organizational Design, Inc. (COD) http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm

    http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    36/45

    MAPAC 2006 36

    LOQ: Consideration

    Relationships with subordinates characterized by:

    Mutual trust

    Respect for their ideas Consideration of their feelings

    Warmth between manager and subordinate

    High score: Good rapport and two-way communications

    Low score: More impersonal in relations with group members

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    37/45

    MAPAC 2006 37

    LOQ: Initiating Structure

    Defines own and subordinates rolestoward goal attainment

    High score: Takes very active role in directing activities through

    Planning

    Communicating information Scheduling

    Criticizing

    Trying new ideas

    Low score: Relatively inactivein directing activites

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    38/45

    MAPAC 2006 38

    LOQused for:

    Training

    Assessment of culture Selection

    Coaching

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    39/45

    MAPAC 2006 39

    MLQ

    Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire(Bass & Avolio)

    Transformational Leadership

    Transactional Leadership Passive/Avoidant

    Mindgarden, Inc.http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm

    http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    40/45

    MAPAC 2006 40

    MLQ: Used for

    Selection

    Succession Planning

    Development (3600 Feedback)

    Diagnosis / coaching

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    41/45

    MAPAC 2006 41

    Some Vendors

    CCLCenter for Creative Leadership http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx

    PDIPersonnel Decisions International

    http://www.personneldecisions.com

    DDIDevelopment Dimensions International

    http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp

    Personnel Testing Council Metropolitan Washington http://www.ptcmw.org/

    (I/O consulting firms)

    http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ptcmw.org/http://www.ptcmw.org/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    42/45

    MAPAC 2006 42

    Conclusion

    Because

    We know who they are & Can identify them

    We can

    Improve Agency functioning & productivity Through effectiveness

    Reduce costs Improve the bottom line

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    43/45

    MAPAC 2006 43

    Leadership

    Comments?

    Questions?

  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    44/45

    MAPAC 2006 44

    Online Sources:

    Center for Creative Leadership http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx

    Development Dimensions International (DDI) http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asp

    Personnel Decisions International http://www.personneldecisions.com

    Hogan Personnel Selection Scale http://www.hoganassessments.com/

    Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire

    http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htm

    Leadership Opinion Questionnaire (LOQ) http://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htm

    http://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspxhttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://www.creativeorgdesign.com/testpages/loq.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://mindgarden.com/products/mlqr.htmhttp://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.hoganassessments.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.personneldecisions.com/http://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ddiworld.com/our_expertise/leadership.asphttp://www.ccl.org/leadership/index.aspx
  • 7/29/2019 Assessing Leadership

    45/45

    MAPAC 2006 45

    References

    Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis.Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

    Bass, B. M. & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational Leadership. 2nd ed. Lawrence Erlbaum, pub. Bass, B. & Avolio, B. (2000). MLQ Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire 2nd ed. Redwood City, CA: Mind Garden Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO PI Personality Inventory: NEO PI and NEO Five Factor

    Inventory (NEO FFI: Professional Manual: Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.) Fiedler, F. (1967).A theory of Leadership Effectiveness. New York: McGraw Hill. Fleishman, E. A. & Harris, E. F. (1962). Patterns of leadership behavior related to employee grievances and

    turnover. Personnel Psychology, 15, 43-56.

    French, J. R. P, & Raven, B. H. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright. (Ed.), Studies of social power ) pp. 150-157. Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research. Jeanneret, Richard, & Silzer, Rob. (1998). Individual Psychological Assessment Predicting behavior in

    organizational settings. Jossey Bass pub. Chapter 12 Shaping organizational leadership. Johnson, Jeff W., Questar Data Systems, Inc. Mineapolis, MN [email protected] (Handout for ratings leadership characteristics) Hersey, P., & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of Organizational Behavior, 3rd 3d. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:

    Prentice Hall House, R. J., & Mitchell, T. R. (1974). Path-goal theory of leadership. Journal ofContemporary Business, 3, 81-97. Kotter, J. P. (1990).A force for change: How leadership differs from management(pp. 3-8). New York: Free Press Northouse, Peter G. (2004). Leadership: Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Sage, pub.

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

Recommended