+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing risks and payment by results

Assessing risks and payment by results

Date post: 06-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: amplified-events
View: 466 times
Download: 5 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
14
ational Council for Voluntary Organisations Sustainable Funding Project AM 6 Assessing risks and payment by results Chair: Fiona Sheil, Public Services Officer, NCVO
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing risks and payment by results

National Council for Voluntary Organisations

Sustainable Funding Project

AM 6

Assessing risks and payment by results Chair: Fiona Sheil, Public Services Officer, NCVO

Page 2: Assessing risks and payment by results

National Council for Voluntary Organisations

Sustainable Funding Project

Fraser Battye Principle at GHK Consultancy

Page 3: Assessing risks and payment by results

Payment by results: risky business or a land of opportunity?

NCVO Sustainable Funding Conference 2012

Fraser Battye

28th November July 2012

Page 4: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

This presentation is a whistle-stop tour of a complex topic. It’s in two parts

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised for the VCS

Page 5: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

PbR is a form of outcomes-based commissioning

2) Issues raised1) What is PbR?

‘Old’ (!) commissioning

State sees a need

State commissions the service

Monitoring of inputs and outputs

(Largely) past model of provision

State sees a need

State works out what to do

State provides service

‘New’ commissioning

State sees a need

State commissions

‘Outcome’ based payment

Fundamental point: PbR is not perfect, how does it compare

relative to alternatives?

Page 6: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

So the intention is to focus on the difference that services make - not on what is done

1) What is PbR?

Outputs

Services provided

People supported

Inputs

Resources needed / consumed

Outcomes

Results: changes in condition / outlook /

knowledge etc

An attractive proposition: only paying insofar as services are effective

2) Issues raised

Page 7: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

At heart, the thinking behind PbR is simple: incentives matter

PbR policyChange in

commissioning / contracts

Change in provider

incentives

Change in service delivery

Improved outcomes for

usersBetter VFM

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised

Page 8: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

PbR is being used as a mechanism for public service reform

“...it is not enough to pay someone to provide a service with the only

recourse being that if they fail they will not be re-awarded the contract. In these cases it makes sense to build in an element of payment by results to provide a constant and

tough financial incentive for providers to deliver good services

throughout the term of the contract.”

15 references to ‘payment by

results’

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised

Page 9: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

PbR is being tested in a range of policy / service areas

Work Programme

Peterborough Prison (SIB)

Smoking Cessation

Children’s Centres Pilots Drug

Rehabilitation

Physical Activity Programmes

Troubled Families

London Reducing

Reoffending Programme

ESF

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised

Page 10: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

‘PbR’ describes a range of different models (which can be blended)

Results for... Payments on... Accounts for...

...populations

...individuals

...outcome

...output

...a % increment

...the whole contract

Incentives for...

...systems

...individual staff

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised

Page 11: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

The debate on PbR is theory-rich and evidence-poor...it can be rather polarised

1) What is PbR?

"Payment by results should be implemented across the public sector without exception – where it exists already, it should be made more forceful and sophisticated, where it does not exist, it should be introduced with very limited transitional periods."

KPMG ‘Payment for Success’

"The NAYJ does not however accept that a case has been made for the benefits of PBR and is concerned the introduction of

the profit motive and market mechanisms may have potentially deleterious effects

on the experience of, and outcomes for, children who come to the attention of the

youth justice system.“

National Association for Youth Justice position paper

"Our review of UK and international research evidence found few rigorous evaluations of PbR and no complete, systematic analysis of its effectiveness.”

Audit Commission

2) Issues raised

Page 12: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

PbR raises a series of important considerations for the VCS

For any given service, what do we mean by ‘result’? How is this to be measured?

Are your commissioners properly equipped for PbR?

Are you? PbR needs good outcome data

What about cash flow (post-outcome payment) and rates of success (no outcome, no payment)? Can risk be properly priced in?

Is the VCS destined to life at the end of a supply chain, or is there the willingness / capacity to lead?

1) What is PbR? 2) Issues raised

Page 13: Assessing risks and payment by results

icfi.com | ghkint.com

ICF GHK has undertaken substantial work on PbR (advisory and evaluative); please get in touch if you would like to know more:

[email protected] / 0121 2338900

Page 14: Assessing risks and payment by results

National Council for Voluntary Organisations

Sustainable Funding Project

Marcus RobertsDirector of Policy, DrugScope


Recommended