+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano [email protected].

Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano [email protected].

Date post: 01-Jan-2016
Category:
Upload: elizabeth-hill
View: 218 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
42
Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing

Chauncey Monte-Sano

[email protected]

Page 2: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Types of writing in the CCSS

Informative textConvey or describe major details pertaining to a topic, event, idea, or person.

NarrativeTell the story of a person, event, or time period. Select what details to include, where to begin and end, cause-effect relationships

ArgumentAn argument has a claim that binds everything in the essay together. The writer includes evidence and explanation or analysis in building an argument.

Page 3: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

WERE AFRICAN AMERICANS FREE AFTER THE CIVIL WAR?

Page 4: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Were African Americans free after the Civil War?

Page 5: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.
Page 6: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.
Page 7: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Types of writing in the CCSS

Informative textConvey or describe major details pertaining to a topic, event, idea, or person.

NarrativeTell the story of a person, event, or time period. Select what details to include, where to begin and end, cause-effect relationships

ArgumentAn argument has a claim that binds everything in the essay together. The writer includes evidence and explanation or analysis in building an argument.

Page 8: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Why argument?

Argument is central to an inquiry approach to social studies (C3)

Critical to college and career readiness, yet only 20% of college students prepared (Graff,2003)

Key to civic preparation in promoting good decision making (Fulkerson, 1996)

Helps students learn content (Wiley & Voss, 1999)

Gives students a voice and an active role in studying social studies (Epstein, 2006)

Page 9: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Using the C3 to frame social studies writing

Page 10: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Goals for historical thinking & argument writing (and C3 overlap)

Take a position in response to question (D1).

Make a clear argument rather than simply summarizing (D4).

Support argument with evidence (D3).

Explain how the evidence supports the argument (D3, D4).

Judge the quality of the evidence (e.g., considers reliability

of authors, time period, or strength of authors’ support- D2, D3).

Consider multiple perspectives (D2).

Page 11: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

EXAMPLES OF ONE STUDENT’S WRITING OVER TIME

Page 12: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Were African Americans free after the Civil War?

Page 13: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Examine Aaron’s pre-test

Look for the following: The main claim Evidence to support argument Explanation of evidence Judgments about the author, context,

evidence Consideration of multiple perspectives

What does Aaron need to improve?

Page 14: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s pre-test

Page 15: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s pre-test

Page 16: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s pretest

Praise: Good writing

Clear claim

Use of examples to support claim

Understanding of basic historical content

Polish: Work on historical writingInclude specific

examples and quotations from texts

Address challenging evidence

Evaluate the sources by noting authors/context

Page 17: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Examine Aaron’s posttest

Look for the following: The main claim Evidence to support argument Explanation of evidence Judgments about the author, context,

evidence Consideration of multiple perspectives

What improvements do you see between essays? What still needs improvement?

Page 18: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s posttest

Page 19: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s posttest

Page 20: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s posttestPraise:

Clear claim

Structure to support claim

Use of examples and quotes to support claim

Explanation of evidence

Evaluation of evidence

Recognition of more than one perspective and complexity of topic

Beginning to evaluate sources

Polish:

Rebut opposing perspectives

Evaluate the sources with greater attention to authors & context

Page 21: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Aaron’s writing and the C3

Page 22: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

ASSESSING STUDENTS’ ESSAYS

Page 23: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Substantiation

Page 24: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Rebuttal

Page 25: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Perspective

Page 26: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Contextualization

Page 27: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Formative assessment

Page 28: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Student self-assessment & goal setting

Page 29: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

SUPPORTING STUDENT GROWTH

Page 30: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

What supported Aaron’s growth?

18-day curriculum (Revolution – Civil War)• Historical reading and writing tools• 6 “Investigations” with central question &

conflicting primary sources (adapted)• Day 1= Background knowledge & reading• Day 2= Reading, analysis/discussion, & planning• Day 3= Composing & reflection

• Investigations 1-3= Teacher modeling & guidance• Investigations 4-6= Increasing student

independence

Page 31: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

“Do” social studies Approach social studies as inquiry (C3) Pose debatable questions (D1) Present contrasting

documents/perspectives (D2, D3) Structure and support reading (D2) Provide opportunity for discussion (D2, D3)

Teach argument writing explicitly (D4) Make expectations explicit Provide models of good writing Model aspects of the writing process

Teaching Principles

Page 32: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

“Do” social studies Approach social studies as inquiry (C3) Pose debatable questions (D1) Present contrasting documents/perspectives

(D2, D3) Structure and support reading (D2) Provide opportunity for discussion (D2, D3)

Teach argument writing explicitly (D4) Make expectations explicit Provide models of good writing Model aspects of the writing process

Assessment Principles

Page 33: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Pose debatable questions (D1)

Present social studies as an inquiry-oriented subject by posing questions that can be answered in multiple ways.

Were African Americans

free after the Civil War?

Page 34: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Good questions…

• …have multiple possible interpretations

• …require analysis and move beyond summary

• …are illuminated by looking at evidence

Page 35: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Present contrasting perspectives (D2, D3)

Give students a chance to investigate and ground their writing in evidence by including sources that present multiple perspectives.

• Select sources that present multiple perspectives

• Sources should support more than one interpretation

• Sources should align with the prompt

Page 36: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Prepare Sources

• Consider students’ reading level and background knowledge

• Orient students to the text• Make sure key information is visible• Create space around the source

• Use large font (16 pt. or bigger)

Page 38: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

Make expectations for argument writing explicit (D4)

Students tend to be assigned summary writing, if assigned writing at all, so…

Explain to students what an argumentative essay should include.

Consider:• What do your students already know about argument?• How is argumentative writing being taught in other

departments?• What are your students’ incoming basic writing skills?

Page 39: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.
Page 40: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

“Do” social studies Approach social studies as inquiry (C3) Pose debatable questions (D1) Present contrasting

documents/perspectives (D2, D3) Structure and support reading (D2) Provide opportunity for discussion (D2, D3)

Teach argument writing explicitly (D4) Make expectations explicit Provide models of good writing Model aspects of the writing process

Teaching Principles

Assessment Principles

Assessment Principle

Page 41: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.
Page 42: Assessing Students’ Historical Thinking & Argument Writing Chauncey Monte-Sano cmontesa@umich.edu.

THANK [email protected]


Recommended