ASSESSING THE EDUCATIONAL GAPS IN AERONAUTICS
AND AIR TRANSPORT
Project start Date: 01 November 2011 – Project Duration: 18 months
Contract Number: 284899
Coordination and support action
(AAT.2011.7-22)
DELIVERABLE 3.7:
ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
Partner Responsible: UA
Date: 30 June 2012
This page is intentionally blank
Document Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Document Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework
Version of the Document:
Final
Dissemination Level: Public
Work Package Allocation:
WP3
Due date of delivery: 31-05-2012 Actual Date of Submission: 30-06-2012
Authors:
(alphabetical order)
Franziska Kupfer (UA)
Els Struyf (UA)
Christa Sys (UA)
Thierry Vanelslander (UA)
Eddy Van de Voorde (UA)
Luís Campos (IST)
Konstantinos Zografos (AUEB-TRANSLOG)
Jelke van der Pal (NLR)
Juan Carlos Hernández (ULPGC)
Stefaan Ghijs (TU-Delft)
Reviewers
(alphabetic order) Rosário Macário (IST)
Document History
# Date Version
1 11-05-2012 Draft
2 25-05-2012 Draft
3 04-06-2012 Final draft
4 30-06-2012 Final version
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:4of 165
This page is intentionally blank
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:5 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 9
2 Task 3.0: Scope of analysis 10
2.1 Defining the scope of project 10
2.1.1 The demand side of the (civil) aviation labour market 10
2.1.2 The supply side of the (civil) aviation labour market 18
2.1.3 The proposed scope of the EDUCAIR project 21
3 Task 3.1: Evolution of the air transport and aeronautics sector & of the educational techniques and tools 22
3.1 Market developments 22
3.1.1 Global trends influencing today’s market 23
3.1.2 The growth of the air transport sector 24
3.1.3 Traffic flows 29
3.1.4 Demand for innovations 31
3.1.4.1 Aircraft construction 31
3.1.4.2 Other new technologies 35
3.1.4.3 Influence from policies 36
3.1.5 Conclusion market developments 37
3.2 Developments in educational tools and techniques 38
3.2.1 Impact of international focus on students 38
3.2.2 Implementation of the international focus in education 39
3.2.2.1 Introduction to foreign cultures 39
3.2.2.2 International curriculum 39
3.2.3 Effect on air transport related education? 41
3.2.4 Changes in aviation-related training: some examples 42
4 Task 3.2: Framework for the assessment of competence gaps 45
4.1 Basic definitions 45
4.2 Goal of this framework 48
4.3 Outlook of the framework 49
4.4 Working with the framework 50
4.5 Survey methodology 52
4.5.1 Sample size 52
4.5.2 Structure of the survey 57
4.5.3 Different surveys 57
4.5.3.1 INDUSTRY SURVEY - Companies 58
4.5.3.2 INDUSTRY SURVEY - Employees 84
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:6of 165
4.5.3.3 EDUCATION SURVEY - Universities 107
4.5.3.4 EDUCATION SURVEY - Students 132
4.5.4 Survey – processing the answers 160
5 References 163
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:7 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Index of Figures
Figure 1: Overview of demand side of the aviation market .......................................................................... 12
Figure 2: Interaction between the different layers of the demand side of the civil aviation labour
................................................................................................................................................................................................ 13
Figure 3: Demand side of the aviation market which will be studied by the EDUCAIR project ..... 14
Figure 4: Interaction between the different layers of the demand side of the civil aviation labour
market and the education & training ...................................................................................................................... 19
Figure 5: Development of air traffic for passengers and cargo (1975 - 2010) ...................................... 24
Figure 6: Air transport and external shocks ........................................................................................................ 25
Figure 7: The recovery of air travel after the recent (economic) crisis .................................................... 25
Figure 8: Growth of world regions over the next 20 years ............................................................................ 27
Figure 9: Forecast of market developments (according to Boeing) ........................................................... 28
Figure 10: Current and future traffic flows .......................................................................................................... 30
Figure 11: Evolution in aircraft fleet (according to Airbus) .......................................................................... 32
Figure 12: Interaction between Knowledge, Skill and Competence .......................................................... 47
Figure 13: Four gaps framework .............................................................................................................................. 49
Figure 14: Overview of different surveys in line with the educational gaps .......................................... 51
Figure 15: Overview of employment in the air transport sector ................................................................ 56
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:8of 165
Index of Table
Table 1: Key functions of key elements of demand side ................................................................................. 15
Table 2: Overview of levels and types of education concerning Air Transport and Aeronautics .. 20
Table 3: Summarizing table of growth in number of aircraft ....................................................................... 37
Table 4: Overview of different educational techniques focused on global education ........................ 40
Table 5: Overview of target group of survey ....................................................................................................... 50
Table 6: Sample size for ±3%, ±5%, ±7% and ±10% Precision Levels Where Confidence Level is
95% and P=.5. ................................................................................................................................................................... 54
Table 7: Sample size for ±5%, ±7% and ±10% Precision Levels Where Confidence Level is 95%
and P=.5. .............................................................................................................................................................................. 54
Table 8: Overview of employment in the air transport sector ..................................................................... 55
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:9 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
1 Introduction
This deliverable consists of three parts. The first part defines the activities performed in Task 3.0
(Scope of the EDUCAIR-project) and explains how the scope of the project was defined. In the
second part, the evolution of the air transport and aeronautics sector and of the educational
techniques and tools is given, since this was studied in Task 3.1. The last part of this deliverable
holds the core of work package 3 since it describes the activities performed in Task 3.2
(Framework for the assessment of competence gaps), i.e. setting the framework for assessing the
competence gaps.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:10of 165
2 Scope of analysis
In the first part of this deliverable, the scope of the EDUCAIR project will be defined.
2.1 Defining the scope of project
In (the last section of) this part, the scope of the EDUCAIR project will be identified. To be able to
determine the scope of the EDUCAIR project, it is important to look at the demand and supply of
the aviation market. So, first, a general overview of demand and supply will be given, which will
be followed by an indication of the elements (of demand and supply) being analysed in the
EDUCAIR project, which will lead to the identification of the scope.
2.1.1 The demand side of the (civil) aviation labour market
To determine the scope of the EDUCAIR project, it is important to first look at the demand side of
the aviation labour market. We can distinguish between the civil and the military labour market
which differ substantially to each other. The project focuses on educational institutions with the
same level of implementation of the Bologna Agreement, despite the evidence that Member
States chose varying degrees of compliance with the Bologna process and some of the military
educational institutions do not follow the Bologna Agreement. Moreover, the type and
orientations of education are quite different. For example, the training of pilots and the mission
involves adversary concerns that are not comparable to commercial competition; the types of
missions and manner of flying can be very different (e.g. low level, violent manoeuvers).
Furthermore, since the military education is often provided by military schools, this sector will
not be considered in the current analysis. So, EDUCAIR will only focus on the civil aviation
labour market.
The demand side of the market includes many different aspects. Therefore, a structured
approach is useful for the analysis of the demand side of the aviation labour market. The next
lines and Figure 1 present that structure; starting from the air vehicle and broadening the view
to every air transport related institution.
At the lowest level, there is the air vehicle. Design and construction of the air vehicle on the one
hand and the maintenance of the air vehicle on the other hand can be distinguished. A large
fraction of airline costs and activities are related to Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul (MRO).
Some airlines do MRO themselves, other use MRO suppliers or rely on the OEM (Original
Equipment Manufacturers). Often, there is a combination of all three.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:11 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
However, as the aeronautics and air transport sector is more than only the aircraft, we have to
broaden the view and, in first instance, also look at the necessary infrastructure and
infrastructure management, as well as infostructure, that is needed by the sector, such as airport
landside and airside infrastructure management and air traffic control navigation and
communication air infrastructure. General air transport management cannot be ignored in this
analysis. Air transport management influences the aviation environment, the aircraft specific
domains and the infrastructure and makes sure that the different domains and layers work well
together.
The third layer comprises the air transport environment. This environment contains aircraft
operations and training, the airport operations, air traffic management and the air transport
companies (airlines). It is important to add here, that, next to the air traffic management, there is
also the management of the aircraft design, development, testing, certification, production and
new versions along the entire life cycle. Managing an aircraft development and production
programme is far more complex than managing an airline or airport and should not be omitted
or ignored. For example, is it generally known that developing a new airliner costs around ten
billion euros; the production of a thousand is worth 100-250 billion euros and life-cycle costs
are much higher (Airliner, 2012, several articles). Development takes five to six years,
production may span ten to twenty years in different versions and lifetime can be over 40 years.
The process involves hundreds of suppliers at four or five levels. Therefore, the technical
managers are often senior engineers after some years of experience and aircraft and equipment
producers also employ economists, personnel managers etc.
At the highest level of the demand side we can find the influencing and advising institutions such
as research institutions, consultants, governments, associations and authorities/regulatory
bodies. Few global industries are as deeply affected by changes in the international and domestic
regulatory environment as the air transport industry. We have seen dramatic regulatory
changes over the past decennia and this trend is expected to continue in the nearby future when
different rules and regulation will continue to affect the global air transport industry. These
regulations involve more than only aircraft related rules. There are regulations involving
certification of an aircraft, some related to safety or to the environment. Establishing these
certification requirements is much more difficult than setting operating standards. For example,
noise and emissions reduction is a certification objective. If the standard is too strict, it is
technically impossible to meet or financially unviable. However, if it is too lax, the noise and
emissions will increase with the growth of traffic. Certification rules are a compromise and
require the same or more skills than operating procedures.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:12of 165
Figure 1 depicts the overview of the demand side of the aviation labour market.
Figure 1: Overview of demand side of the aviation market
Air vehicle Design and construction of the aircraft, (i.e. aerodynamics, engines, materials, structures, on board systems & components, off board tools, ground equipment and training systems) - Design - Construction - Maintenance, Repair and Overhaul Air Transport Service Providers
Aircraft operations and training - Flight deck operations - Cabin operations
Airport operations - Ground services - Safety and security - Pax management - Cargo and baggage handling - Crisis and rescue operations - Airport Patrol - Bird Control - Snow removal & de-icing services - Customs
Air Traffic Management - Air Traffic Control - Network management - Flow control
Air Transport Companies/Airlines - Marketing & Sales - Network management - Fleet management - Yield management - IT-services Etc.
Infrastructure & Infostructure - Airport airside infrastructure management - Airport landside infrastructure management - ATC navigation and communications aid infrastructure - Real estate design, construction and management
Influencing, advising institutions
- Research institutions - Consultants - Government - Associations - Authorities/Regulatory bodies
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:13 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
A side mark urges. Figure 1 provides an overview of different domains, but not necessarily
companies. Several different companies can be active in one domain, for example, both the
airport company and the airlines deal with safety and security. On the other hand, one company
might act in different domains. Ground handling companies deal with ground services, cargo and
baggage handling and snow removal and de-icing.
Furthermore, it is important to bear in mind that the four layers also interact. For example, air
vehicles are designed to fit the air transport environment and the air transport environment also
adapts to progress in air vehicle design. Competences play an important role on the demand
side, since they are needed to successfully fulfill the requirements of the jobs in the different
domains (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Interaction between the different layers of the demand side of the civil aviation labour
Figure 1 and Figure 2depict the basic demand and the derived demand for educated staff. Within
the EDUCAIR project, we only capture the basic demand for educated staff since these elements
grasp the majority of the demand. The project focuses on four elements: manufacturers and
suppliers of air vehicles, airports, airlines and companies that deal with air transport
management. It is also important to add that air vehicles comprise aircraft as well as helicopters,
but the latter goes beyond the scope of the project.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:14of 165
Taking this into account, Figure 3 illustrates the demand side which will be studied by the
EDUCAIR project.
Figure 3: Demand side of the aviation market which will be studied by the EDUCAIR project
Each of these companies grasps some key functions. When looking for the key functions of the
different companies (airlines, airports, air transport management and manufacturers-suppliers)
it is important to bear in mind that not all functions require specific skills, which cannot be
acquired in a general education. Therefore, only functions with a direct relation to the primary
process in the organisation of these players is included. Categories with general functions, such
as finance and control, human resources, communications etc. have not been considered.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:15 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
In Table 1, a non-exhaustive list of key functions / tasks for the different companies can be
found. These key functions / tasks were found by reviewing relevant literature and verified
through practical experience and contacts with the sector. The different key
functions/competences are grouped into different categories per company.
Table 1: Key functions / tasks of demand side elements
Airlines Cockpit Crew:
- planning of the flight
- on board instrument control
- general and radio navigation & communication
- air law & operational procedures
- management of technical aspects (e.g. engine performance, cabin pressurization)
Technics & Engineering:
- maintenance and repair of airframe
- maintenance and repair of power plant
- maintenance and repair of on board instruments
-maintenance and repair of navigation and radio communications equipment
-maintenance and repair of auxiliary systems (undercarriage, hydraulics, air conditioning, etc.)
Planning, Control & ICT:
- coordination of maintenance
- planning and coordination of operations
- safety management
- flight dispatching
-determination and provision of meteorological circumstances
- ramp planning
Airports Infrastructure
Design:
- airside infrastructure (runways, taxiways, aprons and holding bays design)
- building and terminal (passenger and cargo terminals, ancillary services buildings)
- landside access
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:16of 165
Building & Construction:
- airside infrastructure
- building and terminal
- landside access
Infrastructure planning:
- master planning
- land use
Operations
Handling:
- handling of passengers (e.g. luggage handling)
- handling of freight (e.g. loading and unloading)
- handling of air vehicles (e.g. fueling, de-icing)
Maintenance:
- airside (runways and other surfaces)
- terminal
Environmental control:
- noise control
- emission control
- waste management
- wildlife control
Security:
- security concerning passengers
- security concerning cargo
- security concerning employees
- prevention of intrusion/unauthorized access
Air Traffic Control and Management
Area Control:
- supervision of Area Control Centre operations
- en route aircraft control
- planning & coordination en route air traffic
Approach Control:
- supervision & planning approach operations
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:17 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
- provision of terminal radar approach control
Tower Control:
- supervision of tower operations
- on the ground aircraft movements control
- aircraft landing & taking-off control
Other ATC operations:
- provision of flight information to VFR (Visual Flight Rules) traffic
- planning and coordination of network capacity
ATM:
- design, development and evaluation of ATC procedures
- design, development and sustainment of ATC systems, product and tools
- management of safety of ATC operations
- management of air traffic capacity and efficiency
- management of interaction of operational controllers with operational environment
Manufacturers - Suppliers Research & Technology:
- failure assessment and recognition
- avionics, electronic and electrical systems & EMC (Electromagnetic Compatibility)
- customer service
- fluid mechanics and acoustics
- propulsion and powerplant
- RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety), human factors & operability
- software design & IT (Information Technology)
- structural design
- test engineering
- services solutions
- quality engineering
- production rigs
Operations:
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:18of 165
- airline operations appreciation
- components and aircraft architecture
- manufacturing engineering
- maintenance
- RAMS (Reliability, Availability, Maintainability and Safety), human factors & operability
- governance
- risk management
- composites manufacturing and assembly
Engineering:
- aircraft operability and design maturity integration
- design
- failure assessment and recognition
- stress and structures analysis
- materials and processes
- systems engineering and architecture
- airworthiness and certification
- architecture, integration and in-service support
- systems & electronics engineering
- structural & general engineering
- flight physics
- configuration management
- composites design and stress
- supply management
- lean experts & supply chain quality field engineering
- electrical design/integration
2.1.2 The supply side of the (civil) aviation labour market
Subsequently, we look at the supply side of the aviation market. Education acts as a central
supplier to the aforementioned loop (Figure 2). It provides the qualified staff for the labour
market to function.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:19 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Figure 4: Interaction between the different layers of the demand side of the civil aviation labour market and the education & training
When studying the education in air transport and aeronautics more in detail, distinctions
between basic education and complementing programmes can be made. Basic educational
programmes in air transport and aeronautics consist of several courses, spread over one or
more years, evolving towards a degree in air transport and aeronautics. These programmes are
organized by institutions such as universities. Next, we can distinguish between programmes
organised on academic level (1st and 2nd Bologna Cycle) or research level (3rd Bologna Cycle).
There are, however, also programmes which are more focused on tactical learning, on acquiring
specific skills for immediate use. They are organized to complement or deepen the knowledge
gained during previous education. Here, we think about lifelong learning, either vocational or
professional or corporate training. Vocational programmes are programmes that prepare
trainees for jobs that are based on manual or practical activities, traditionally non-academic and
related to a specific occupation and training leading up to obtaining a license in the air transport
sector (such as Pilot, Air Traffic Controller, Aircraft Maintenance Mechanic, Aeronautical Station
Operator, and Flight Operations Officer). On the other hand, professional or corporate
programmes are tailor-made for the employees of a company. Here, the IATA training program,
Lufthansa University, DLR School, etc. are typical examples.
The EDUCAIR project will focus on engineering education when studying the basic education
programmes on the 1st and 2nd level of Bologna and particularly programmes involving
explicitly a degree (rather than just individual courses) in air transport and aeronautics.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:20of 165
For the education on the 3rd level of Bologna (i.e. PhD programs) and the post doc research, also
other educational areas are analysed, for example management/business economics, law,
economics/public policy. Here, the same universities that are included in the 1st and 2nd cycle,
but also institutions with provable expertise will be approached. To identify the list of
universities, several academic/research networks (such as ATRS, WCTRS-SIG 8, Pegasus) will be
consulted. For the vocational programmes, a deeper analysis will be undertaken within WP4 .
The project focuses on engineering, which is air transport/aeronautics related, when looking
into the professional programmes.
Table 2 summarizes the various supply entities that will be covered by the EDUCAIR project.
Table 2: Overview of levels and types of education concerning Air Transport and Aeronautics
Level of education Type of education
Academic:
University
1st and 2nd cycle of Bologna Engineering
3rd cycle of Bologna
Engineering Management/ Business
Economics Law Economics/ Public
Policy
Research (post-doc)
Engineering Management/ Business
Economics Law Economics/ Public
Policy
Non-academic:
Lifelong learning
Vocational programmes (licenses)
License programmes mentioned above
Professional programmes Engineering
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:21 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
2.1.3 The proposed scope of the EDUCAIR project
As already stated before, only part of the demand side and part of the supply side will be studied
in the EDUCAIR project. On the demand side, the project focuses on four elements: Airlines,
Airports, Air Transport Management and Manufacturers-Suppliers. Concerning the supply side,
engineering programmes (1st and 2nd Bologna Cycles) in air transport and aeronautics, PhD
programmes in engineering and other education will be studied, as well as post doc research,
vocational and professional-corporate programmes will be targeted.
In our study, institutions or organisations related to these domains will be approached
concerning the competences to analyse the gaps between demand and supply.
1. Airlines
2. Airports
3. Companies involved in air transport management (such as air traffic control and
management organisations)
4. Aircraft manufacturers and suppliers
5. Universities and colleges with engineering programmes involving air
transport/aeronautics
6. Universities and colleges with research and PhD programmes in air
transport/aeronautics
7. Vocational training institutes
8. Professional training institutes
The scope of the survey was geographically fixed to the EU27. However, for other parts of the
study also examples (from the US) will be considered if they give valuable additional information
to better analyse the European situation.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:22of 165
3 Evolution of the air transport and aeronautics sector & of the
educational techniques and tools
Many (recent) evolutions affect the air transport sector and its education. On the one hand there
are evolutions that affect the demand for education regarding air transport, i.e. market
developments, but on the other hand, there are also evolutions which affect the way the
education is supplied, i.e. developments in educational tools and techniques. In part 1, both
developments are discussed.
3.1 Market developments
The EDUCAIR project studies the current air transport market demand and educational supply
to advice on better alignment of both elements in the future. Therefore, it is important to take a
good look on the future demand in the air transport sector. Moreover, in the air transport sector,
as in every business, it is important to develop a good strategy which ensures some market
share in the future. To make sure that the strategy is tuned to the future market, actors develop
market forecasts. Studying the forecasts of important suppliers of the air transport sector
(Airbus, Boeing, Embraer, etc.) gives a look into the future demand and supply. Moreover,
figures accompanying the text stem from the forecasts of suppliers.
On the one hand, there are more general forecasts that focus more on traffic evolution and do
not provide an insight in the number of aircraft needed or provided in the future. Forecasts of
manufacturers/suppliers, on the other hand, help us understand the true (technological)
dynamics with which the air transport market is faced and are thus chosen to be analyzed in this
document.
The summary below is limited to future trends which have an impact on the scope of the
EDUCAIR project: it shows developments in (upcoming) markets, in traffic, in construction and
the consequences trends have for the technologies used and the competences needed. One has to
bear in mind that also other important evolutions will occur, for example in the formation of
alliances. However, these evolutions have small or none influence on the elements studied in the
project, so, these developments are not listed below.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:23 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.1.1 Global trends influencing today’s market
When looking at future scenarios for air transportation, one needs to look at the bigger picture.
Over the last twenty years, non-industry related factors have helped to drive the development of
the air transport sector.
First of all, there is the global liberalization. The Deregulation Act of 1978 loosened the
government control on air transport. From then on, incumbents could no longer prevent
newcomers to enter the market. Furthermore, open skies agreements opened up the markets for
foreign access, which reduced the barriers for competition even further. This all resulted in a
situation where airlines are (more) free to enter the market and therefore, competition
increased. Derived effects are the decrease of airfares and the improvement of service quality
making air transport even more attractive and available. One could say that, also due to the
deregulation, passengers have more travel options and air travel demand has increased.
The second trend influencing is the urbanization: more and more people tend to move to and
settle in cities. For the first time in history, more than half of the world’s population lives in
urban centers. Cities have become a major driver of globalization and the engine of economic
growth. They have quickly transformed the economies through international trade, attracting
large multinational corporations, international media and foreign tourism. Importantly, a rise in
urban population has historically led to an increase in per capita GDP, a key driver for aviation
(Airbus, 2011, p.18).The rise of such cities implies a greater need for secondary airports – to
eventually reduce the added pressure on existing airports - and aircraft (of the right size) to
serve these new markets.
Another important trend is the consolidation of large airlines and the disappearance of smaller
airlines. Furthermore, the sector is confronted with the emergence of alliances and low-cost
carriers. These evolutions have implications for the demand of aircraft. E.g. low-cost carriers
tend to use one type of aircraft.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:24of 165
3.1.2 The growth of the air transport sector
The aviation industry, as any industry, faces several challenges: political turmoil, natural
disasters, financial crises, etc. Nevertheless, as can be seen in Figure 5, the world annual traffic
grew tremendously over the last decades.
Figure 5: Development of air traffic for passengers and cargo (1975 - 2010)
Source: ICAO
The air transport sector has been able to overcome the challenges it was faced with (see Figure
6) and, looking at Figure 7, one might say that the air transport sector has also overcome the
recent crisis. The financial crisis of 2008-2009 reached a low point at the beginning of 2009 with
a negative growth of almost -4%. Moreover, forecasts predict that the air transport sector will
grow even more in the future. The emergence and development of several drivers act as engines
to this growth.
0
20000
40000
60000
80000
100000
120000
140000
160000
180000
200000
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
19
75
19
76
19
77
19
78
19
79
19
80
19
81
19
82
19
83
19
84
19
85
19
86
19
87
19
88
19
89
19
90
19
91
19
92
19
93
19
94
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
20
10
Pas
sen
ger-
km (
mill
ion
)
Fre
igh
t to
nn
e-k
m (
mill
ion
)
Passenger-km (billion) Freight tonne-km (million)
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:25 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Figure 6: Air transport and external shocks
Source: Airbus
Figure 7: The recovery of air travel after the recent (economic) crisis1
Source: Airbus
1 RPK = Revenue Passenger Kilometers
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:26of 165
About 60 to 80 percent of the air travel growth can be attributed to economic growth, which in
turn is driven by international trade. This is consistent with the observation that countries
whose economies are tied to trade tend do have higher rates of air travel. The remaining 20 to
40 percent results from the value travelers place on air travel (Boeing, 2011). First of all, it
became clear that people want and need to fly and therefore global mobility will expand
strongly. Nowadays the miracle of flight is taken for granted. Travelling to the other side of the
world is only a few mouse clicks and a trip to the airport away (Airbus, 2011, p.5). Moreover, it is
observable that people “have” to fly for various reasons such as travelling to family that live
abroad, visiting clients in another continent2, etc. Migration and the globalization ensure the
continuous urge to fly. What’s more, at industry level, the continuing deregulation drives growth.
On the one hand, the increased competition results in low airfares, which makes travelling by air
also accessible for the people who are less wealthy. The advent of the low cost model also
created demand. More and more people around the world are provided with the ability to fly. On
the other hand, air travel becomes more attractive since a larger amount of destinations offered
by various airlines.
The ratio between the growth that comes from economic development and the growth that is a
result of the value of air travel services is an indicator of the maturity of an air travel market. For
example, Western Europe and the North America are more mature markets and are therefore
faced with lower growth rates, compared to countries in Africa, South America, etc. Figure 9
shows the difference in (traffic) growth in the different regions.
2Although new technologies, such as video conferencing, lowered the need for face-to-face contact.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:27 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Figure 8: Growth of world regions over the next 20 years
Source: Boeing
Although there was a rapid rebound after the crisis, it has to be acknowledged that the crisis
accentuates that the growth is unbalanced. Emerging countries accounted for 69% of the world
population in 2010 and they account for 56% of the economic growth. Furthermore, rates of
urban growth in developing countries have been higher than those of developed countries
(Airbus, 2011, p.47), which results in the rise of the emerging economies global middle class.
Developed markets are more mature in the air travel market, which means that they will grow at
a slower pace compared to the emerging markets. Therefore, in the coming years, a shift in the
global power from west to east, and in some extent to the south (Embraer, 2011, p.6) is
observable; from Europe and North America to e.g. Asia and Africa (see paragraph about Traffic
Flows).
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:28of 165
The Transport Outlook 2011 of the International Transport Forum predicts high and roughly
constant growth rates on global level that leads to a tripling or quadrupling of the global
passenger transport volumes by 2050 compared to 2000. The growth in the developed
economies can be expected to be slow and gradual while the emerging economies grow very
fast. (International Transport Forum, 2011)Forecasts from aircraft manufacturers predict an
average annual growth of 5%. Airbus (2011) foresees an annual growth of 4.84% from 2010 to
2030. They say that many of the driver’s growth will lead to more traffic to and from the
emerging economies but that mature markets will still account for a significant share of 2030
traffic volumes. For example, the single biggest traffic flow will be the US domestic with 11.1% of
all RPK’s flown. Intra Western European traffic, with its well established global and LCC, will be
the third largest flow with nearly 8% of world RPK’s. The Chinese domestic market is forecast to
grow at more than 7% per annum, moving it from the fourth largest flow in 2010 to the second.
Figure 9 shows that Boeing (2011) predicts a long-term growth rate of approximately 5% per
year, 5.1% growth in passenger traffic and the cargo market will grow at 5.6% annual rate over
the next 20 years.
Figure 9: Forecast of market developments (according to Boeing)
Source: Boeing
In its forecast for 2011 to 2030, Embraer (2011) forsees that the world air traffic demand will
grow by 5,2% per year.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:29 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.1.3 Traffic flows
As already stated, the urbanization continues and this results in growing cities all over the
world, great and small. Given the importance of these cities, one might say that traffic is located
between those points. The global route network has expanded with more than 17,000 city-pairs
and since the emerging markets have more upcoming cities, a lot of those new routes involve
markets in emerging countries. On the other hand, there are larger cities, which traditionally are
centers of air transport demand, due to their socio-economic weight within a certain region.
These cities are vital points for world trade and they are also big population centers with an
enormous appeal far beyond their borders. These cities often serve as a connection hub for one
or more home carriers or so called flag carriers (Airbus, 2011, p.25).
Given the fact that there will be more traffic, airports become bigger (in movements). In
emerging countries, airports are growing faster and will join the top 25 of biggest airports. Some
European airports, on the other hand, are operating at full capacity. As a result, traffic is likely to
spread somewhat more across the airport network (Eurocontrol, 2010, p.26). Therefore hubs
can be either located in developed countries or in emerging countries. Forty years ago most of
the world’s traffic flew from, to or between North America, Western Europe and Japan. In 2010,
the North American market still dominated (see Figure 10). As more people around the world
have embraced flight and are able to take the advantage of its benefits this has dramatically
changed. In the future, the air traffic flows are centered in other parts of the world (Airbus, 2011,
p.7):Airbus (2011) predicts that by 2030 Asia-Pacific will have the highest share of RPK’s in the
world (see Figure 10).
However, as future growth also takes place in midsized and small middleweight cities, there is a
need for secondary airports and new opportunities for airlines to explore new markets with
right sized airplanes.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:30of 165
Figure 10: Current and future traffic flows
Source: Airbus
According to Airbus (2011), over the next twenty years, more than 700 new city-pairs will be
added on the long-haul market. By 2030, a total of 87 cities around the world will have passed
the threshold of 10,000 daily passengers, to become aviation mega-cities. The emerging regions
of the world will contribute an additional 29 long-haul traffic hubs, as their economic power and
wealth grows passenger traffic within these regions.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:31 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.1.4 Demand for innovations
The future demand, the trends in passenger demographics and the increasing focus on the
environment leads to a rising demand for innovations in aircraft design as well as other areas
such as air transport management. As the demand grows, the educational supply has to follow
since a bigger market has a complementary need for well trained staff.
3.1.4.1 Aircraft construction
Air traffic will more than double over the next twenty years since aviation becomes more
accessible to those in emerging markets as well as to those in more traditional markets. Due to
this larger demand, more aircraft will be needed in the future. These aircraft have to be tuned to
the nature of the markets they will serve. For example, in emerging countries different upcoming
cities can be identified. This asks for more short haul travel, performed by relatively small
airplanes.
Furthermore, people will increasingly travel (between global centers) and therefore, airlines
have to keep innovating and improving to reduce the costs for themselves and for the
environment. Because of this, the need for eco-friendly airplanes will rise. Also other factors, like
environmental regulation (e.g. emission trading schemes), pressure from customers, etc. play a
role.
3.1.4.1.1 More airplanes of different sizes
The ever-growing numbers of people who will have access to aviation will result in an increase
in the number of airplanes.
Airbus (2011) predicts that the world’s fleet of passenger aircraft will grow from 15,000 at the
beginning of 2011 to nearly 31,500 by 2030. At the same time, 14,000 aircraft from the existing
fleet will be replaced by more eco-friendly models. Of these, 3,400 will be recycled back into
passenger service, where they too will replace an older generation model. Airbus (2011)
forecasts that 2,200 will be converted to freighters and the remaining 1,100 will be permanently
retired or withdrawn from service.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:32of 165
Figure 11: Evolution in aircraft fleet (according to Airbus)
Source: Airbus
Boeing states that the world fleet will count 39,500 airplanes by 2030. Of the 19,400 airplanes in
operation today, 13,400 will be replaced over the next 20 years and not less than 33,500 new
airplanes will be delivered. Embraer (2011) only predicts 21,770 new aircraft of which 59% (+/-
12,800) will be to support market growth and 41% (+/- 8,900) to replace old aircraft. By 2030,
30% of the current fleet in service will remain in operation. According to Embraer (2011), the
world fleet will increase from 19,120 (in 2010) to 36,910 (in 2030).
Furthermore, people will fly between the increasing number of aviation mega-cities and hubs so
it is important to scale the (additional) aircraft to market requirements. There are three types of
jet aircraft which can be distinguished.
Narrow body – single aisle
First of all, there are the narrow body, also known as single aisle, aircraft. Those airplanes have
between 100 to 210 seats and are a very significant part of today’s aviation network,
representing the majority3 of the global fleet above 100 seats. Single-aisle aircraft will still be an
important component of the fleet in 20 years time and will also become the focus of new
entrants due to thereduction of the environmental impact and low unit costs. Single-aisle
airplanes are used to serve short- and medium-haul markets, which are the fastest growing
markets thanks to the (intraregional) travel in emerging economies (Boeing, 2011).
3 Almost 80% (according to Airbus) or 62% (according to Boeing)
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:33 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Of the 33,500 new airplanes, predicted by Boeing (2011), 23,370 will be single aisle aircraft.
Airbus (2011) predicts that only 19,200 new deliveries will be single aisles. Embraer (2011)
predicts 16,185 new single aisle airplanes of the 21,770 new deliveries. This grasps the majority
of the fleet: 70 to 80 percent of the global fleet.
Wide body – twin aisle
The twin-aisle segment, or segment of wide body aircraft, covers airplanes with a capacity of
250 to 400 seats. This segment has had some product development activity in the recent years -
with two all-new product families entering service in the next few years- (Airbus, 2011, p.70),
which shows that it is important for airlines and manufacturers. With an annual growth rate of
4.4% it is the fastest growing segment. Airbus (2011)stresses the fact that twin aisle passengers
aircraft will be required to serve the existing, mainly international, markets created largely by
growth on existing city pairs. They will also be used for flows from and within emerging markets
and for new routes, for example thanks to the upcoming cities, which imply more traffic between
mega aviation hubs and secondary airports. Furthermore, airlines can allocate these aircraft to
non-stop routes which are made possible by the liberalization.
Boeing (2011) states that 7,330 of the 33,500 (22%) new deliveries will be twin aisle aircraft
while Airbus (2011) predicts that the number of wide body aircraft will more than double (to
7,100) over the next twenty years. Forty percent will be replacing older aircraft and 3,800 new
twin aisle airplanes will contribute to the growth of the segment.
(Very) large aircraft
The very large aircraft are used to travel between world’s major airports and cities. These
airplanes have the advantage of combining minimized seat costs, minimizing fuel as well as CO2,
and enough space on board, as passengers request. Furthermore, they can be allocated to routes
where they are needed because of the large amount of traffic. The segment will keep on growing
thanks to the growing network and the need for people to fly.
Airbus (2011) foresees that there will be 1,300 very large aircraft produced by 2030, while
Boeing (2011) predicts that 820 (2%) of the new deliveries will consist of large aircraft.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:34of 165
3.1.4.1.2 Environmental issues
In recent years, a lot of attention was paid to environmental issues. Fuel and noise emissions
became urgent matters and government policies related to emissions and noise are expected to
become even stricter. Although the emissions of air traffic account for only 2 percent of the
greenhouse effect, new environmental regulations, such as the European emission trading
schemes, will increase the costs related to fuel (burn) (Embraer, 2011, p.7). Nowadays fuel
becomes an ever increasing share of an airline’s operating cost. According to Airbus (2011),
currently fuel represents more than 30% of airlines’ operating expenses. Due to global problems
like financial crises, political problems and natural disasters, the oil prices increase even more.
This enlarges the need for more eco-friendly aircraft. Furthermore, the need to reduce fuel
consumption also drives demand for new or re-engined (existing) aircraft. These aircraft would
consume less fuel and will therefore be more attractive, which results in more orders.
Eco-friendliness can be achieved in various ways. First and foremost, airlines can try to limit the
amount of fuel needed. Adopting new technologies, such as aerodynamic technologies, can
reduce the fuel consumption. To avoid or limit costs related to environmental policies, airlines
can focus on lowering the emission of the aircraft in use, for example by building new engines.
Also the search for alternative fuels, such as biomass, is crucial.
Not only fuel emissions, but also noise emissions became important. Although the forecasts that
were analyzed, only briefly touch the issue, aviation noise comes with a cost. It has a severe
impact on communities surrounding airports, i.e. the quality of life of people living in the areas
surrounding the airport. Not only the human wellbeing is affected, also other effects appear. For
example, noise depreciation of house values affect the human welfare. There are various options
to deal with this; either one can ease the problem “symptoms”, for example by offering
compensations to the affected people, or mitigate the problems (partly) using measures such as
lowering the noise exposure limits.
Taking these two environmental issues into account, it is important to realize that both issues
become more severe with traffic growth. Also the objectives of lowering CO2 and NOx-emissions
and reducing noise have different (sometimes even opposite) implications in aircraft and engine
design. Then, compromises are needed.
Furthermore, airlines can reduce costs by working efficiently. The load factor of an aircraft
reflects the efficiency with which it is filled. If the load factor of an airplane is too low, this
results in lost revenue, higher prices for passengers and a less environmental friendly travel.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:35 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.1.4.1.3 Derived effects
The fleet expands and that has an effect on the employment in the market. The need for well-
trained employees grows in proportion to the expanding global fleet. More pilots and
technicians are required and will be allocated to the additional services or replace other
employees. Boeing (2011) foresees that the market calls for 460,000 additional pilots and
650,000 maintenance technicians.
In literature, the shortage of pilots and technicians is frequently mentioned. However, also other
types of aviation operations require professionals. For example, seldom does one hear about
personnel shortage concerns extending to the Air Traffic Controllers (ATCs) who will be
managing increasing numbers of aircraft in our finite airspace. (ICAO, 2011a, p.20)
The air charter, corporate aviation, and aerial work industry segments comprise an estimated
200,000 pilots and 300,000 mechanics worldwide. Given nominal growth rates, requirements
for these occupations twenty years from now could increase to 500,000 and 600,000
respectively. In aggregate, the world of civil aviation is looking at a requirement for more than a
million individuals for pilots and mechanics by the year 2029. (ICAO, 2011a, p.17)
The growing diversity of pilots and maintenance technicians in training will require instructors
to have cross-cultural and cross-generational skills, in addition to digital training tools and up-
to-date knowledge of airplanes (Boeing, 2011). Also here, a distinction between emerging and
developed countries can be made. For example, in emerging countries there is a strong need for
basic skills training for technicians to develop a local source.
Furthermore, it is important to bear in mind that there are different rules concerning safety in
different countries. For example, accident rates are much lower in Europe and the US than in
Africa or Russia. The fact that some airlines are banned to fly to Europe shows that there is a
safety gap. Therefore, there is a need for personnel with the right competences, e.g. for the
decision-making process.
3.1.4.2 Other new technologies
The expansion of the fleet requires a significant investment in infrastructure to accommodate
the increased traffic. Furthermore, the future technological environment will need to be shaped
in order to meet the future characteristics and dynamics of the market.
This “new technology” is a diffuse collection of measures, which enhances air traffic control,
aircraft and airport technology, including organizations (Airbus, 2011, p.38).
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:36of 165
3.1.4.2.1 Improvements in air traffic management
Future growth will be limited by the available capacity at the airports. Nowadays, traffic is highly
concentrated on major airports which already have a high degree of capacity utilization. For
example, last year, London Heathrow operated at 99.2%4 of its capacity. Therefore, a lot of those
large airports are operating at their maximum capacity and this leads to congestion. These
problems can become barriers to future growth or, at the very least, will affect the composition
of the future fleet and operations in terms of aircraft size and frequency (Airbus, 2011, p.35).
Airlines focus on the most efficient and economic utilization of their fleet and can either change
their frequencies or the size of their aircraft (Eurocontrol, 2010, p.22). Capacity shortages on
airports may thus lead to a shift to bigger aircraft if expansion is not possible, at least not on
short term, if the separation distance is the same or not much larger, that is. Another effect is the
traffic growth at smaller airports with less congestion, where smaller airplanes would be used.
Redistributing the existing fleet is a measure that can ease the pressure on airports in the short
term. Smaller airplanes are redistributed to smaller airports and the vacant slots can be used by
large airplanes.
3.1.4.3 Influence from policies
On the one hand, air transport operators request innovations to make their fleet as efficient as
possible. However, manufacturers also have to innovate due to different policies. The influence
of regulatory intervention, namely deregulation and CO2-emmission were already mentioned in
this section, but one has to bear in mind that also for example security measures, changes in
separation minima, the reorganization of the European airspace, the free flight concept
andpricing policies drive the demand for innovation.
4 Airliner World (2012) stated that, in 2011, 476,197 flights were recorded, while the maximum capacity of Heathrow is set on 480,000 flights.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:37 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.1.5 Conclusion market developments
The emergence of global cities (due to urbanization) and global companies (due to
liberalization) will increase the demand and connectivity between cities and will drive the shape
and development of the air transport in the future and in turn the numbers and types of aircraft
which will be needed (Airbus, 2011, p.20). As discussed in this part, two main trends can be
distinguished.
First of all, traffic will increase thanks to the fact that air transport becomes better accessible to
people, all around the world. Liberalization makes markets better accessible for airlines, which
in turn charge lower prices to their passengers. This in combination with the growing wealth
ensures the increase of the demand for air transport. Furthermore, people will travel more
between (new) population centers. Here, it is important that the right (sized) airplanes are
serving the markets. Short-haul flights will be performed by relatively small airplanes, the (very)
large aircraft will fly long-haul flights.
The second large trend that was identified is the fact that the aviation industry will want to keep
innovating. Doing this, the costs for airlines can be reduced by increasing the productivity and
efficiency. Good air traffic management and improved technology are crucial here. Furthermore,
it is also important to reduce the environmental costs, fuel- and noise-related.
Different sources predict further growth of the market. On average, a growth of 5% is forecasted.
This growth implies that more, ecofriendly aircraft are needed. Moreover, some of the existing
fleet is converted, e.g. to freighters. The table below (Table 3) gives an overview of the different
forecasts.
Table 3: Summarizing table of growth in number of aircraft
Source: own composition, based on Airbus, Boeing, Embraer
Because more and more airplanes are needed, which also have to be eco-friendly, the demand
for qualified personnel increases. Designers, builders, technicians etc. have to have the right
competences to deliver the aircraft needed. Especially engineers will be required as the aircraft
industry has those jobs represent a large proportion within the sector. Finding the required
number, with a high level of skills, will become an issue, even in countries with a high level of
education. Also aviation technology integrates more and more areas of progress and
specialisation which demands certain competences. Furthermore, more aircraft come with
increased demand for on board personnel. For example, every extra airplane needs a pilot with
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:38of 165
the right competences. The question remains whether the graduates possess the competences
companies want their new employees to have.
3.2 Developments in educational tools and techniques
Since education is a key social structure, it is impacted on by globalization. Therefore, the trend
of globalization is also reflected in the education. Nowadays, educational programs provide an
international focus and curriculum planners tend to internationalize the higher education
systems. The reason for this movement is threefold. Politically, higher education is an aspect of
the foreign policy. Culturally, the goal of internationalization is to extend the values and
principles of the national culture. And economic, international higher education is the main
source of both short term and long term income.
Moreover, universities are considered the main measure of progress in a country and provide
the basis for the dynamic competition of a country in the region and in the world. So,
strengthening the international aspect of higher education is strengthening the country in the
regional and international competition. (Ardakani et al., 2011)
3.2.1 Impact of international focus on students
Students should be able to function in a one-world environment, intellectually as well as
professionally and socially. This is especially important in the air transport and aeronautics
sector as they often recruit international employees and have an international scope of
operations. According to Parkinson et al. (2009), it is important that (engineer) students develop
a global competence. This implies that students should appreciate other cultures and that they
should be able to communicate across cultures. Therefore, they should also be able to speak
different languages, on conversational as well as professional level. Furthermore, they should
understand and be able to deal with the cultural differences. This makes them view themselves
as citizens of the world as well as citizens of a particular country. To achieve this, students
should be provided the opportunity to be exposed to international topics and have a chance to
work in a global context.
Furthermore, the last few years, traditional “chalk and talk” teaching was gradually replaced by
active learning and learning through practice. Furthermore, the individual perspective was
transformed into team work to acquire the wanted skills. Some papers for example talk about
learning with board games or simulation games to get a good notion of the material they have to
learn. Others refer to project-based learning instead of lecture-based learning. This shows that,
next to gaining knowledge, it is also important to be submerged in what you’re studying by
gaining some experience and practice.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:39 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.2.2 Implementation of the international focus in education
Setting up such an international education, can be done by infusing the international aspect in
the existing curricula or by developing a curriculum which is international.
3.2.2.1 Introduction to foreign cultures
The first option implies that students are exposed to foreign cultures, professors and students in
their own context. Setting up traditional international activities, such as visiting international
conferences or organizing guest lectures of foreign speakers, introduces students to foreign
cultures. This way, students learn to understand the (slight) difference of the position of their
own culture in comparison to other cultures. However, these international contacts are limited.
Students only experience the international aspect in a short term.
3.2.2.2 International curriculum
Developing an international curriculum, allows establishing longer and more profound contact.
This can be achieved the traditional way; students can either travel abroad, for several months,
to study. This way, there is a more in-depth exposure to the foreign culture. Here, extended field
trips, internships or even research activities abroad spring to mind.
On the other hand, thanks to technology, international experience can also be gained without
leaving the own office.
The last 10 to 15 years, technology and telecommunications have developed a lot. The Internet
made real-time communication with virtually anyone, almost anywhere in the world possible
and relatively inexpensive Therefore, the Internet became indispensable for our day-to-day
communication. The importance of this technology becomes more and more apparent: a study,
performed in 26 different countries by GlobeScan commissioned by BBC (2010), showed that
worldwide 80% of the people find that Internet access is a human right, next to freedom of
speech and clean drinking water. The study highlighted that the majority of the respondents
stated to see the Internet as a source of information, rather than entertainment. The rise and
importance of this technology virtually made the world smaller.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:40of 165
Nowadays, students can follow courses and lectures by using internet-based tools. This, is called
e-learning. These tools can however also bring students from different educational institutes all
over the world together in virtual classrooms. The drawback from this distance learning is that
students only make virtual contact with foreign cultures and are not really submerged in it.
Table 4: Overview of different educational techniques focused on global education
Introduction to foreign cultures
Short Term Hours, days
International conferences, guest lectures, ...
Travel abroad or on own campus
Regular degree
International curriculum
Medium Term Months Extended field trips, internships, research or learning abroad, summer programs, Exchange students, ...
Travel abroad Degree with international experience
Medium Term Months E-learning, virtual class rooms, ...
On own campus, distance learning
Degree with international experience
Long(er) Term Months, years
International dual degree, ...
Travel abroad (Partly) international degree
Source: own composition
Moreover, education is not always about teaching, learning and courses. Interacting with other
international students and professors is also very important to keep our knowledge up to date.
This interaction can also be virtual and this has also been facilitated through technological
developments, such as the Internet. International knowledge bases and even laboratories appear
more and more in the virtual world.
This international focus facilitates student exchanges. Therefore, the competition between
universities increases which entails that offering a qualitative international education program
becomes more important.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:41 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
3.2.3 Effect on air transport related education?
The air transport sector includes various disciplines and is very internationally focused.
Therefore, a global or international focus is also needed in the air transport related education.
In his editorial, Torenbeek (2000) showed that, although design educators had been in contact,
for example on international conferences, Professor Rodrigo Martinze-Val of ETSIA believes that
the quality of teaching aircraft design could benefit from more regular exchanges of experiences.
Therefore, European Workshops on Aircraft Design Education are held regularly (every two
years). This is done to continue active collaboration, to discuss problems as regards research
and education and to enhance close cooperation for these two aspects aforementioned.
This shows that, also in air transport related research and education, an international focus is
desirable.
A paper by Atici and Atik (2011) shows that distance learning is applied in the Turkish Air
Forces (for lifelong learning programs). The paper highlights that the need for education is
increasing, but the resources are limited. “At this point, distance learning is applied in many
education institutes as an alternative solution to satisfy the demand”. The study stresses the fact
that the cost of face to face learning is threefold the cost of distance education.
Jenkinson et al. (2000) state that “aircraft design courses at universities have attempted to
simulate industrial design practices. This has generally involved both the synthesis of students’
knowledge in their core subjects and a requirement to work in teams.” They highlight the fact that,
nowadays, thanks to the rapid development of information technology, it is possible to team
internationally. The educational objectives of the collaboration between a university in the US
and a university in the UK are
to model modern, international industrial design practices;
to broaden the perspective of student aircraft design projects;
to improve student understanding of communication and organizational skills;
to enhance students’ personal development;
to benefit faculty experience.
They will achieve this in different ways, such as case studies, parallel teams, where student
groups in each country independently work on the same design proposal, and integrated teams,
which involves that students in each country work together on a joint design project.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:42of 165
Such a project can only become a success if several prerequisites are fulfilled. For example, a
common educational objective for the project work is needed. Furthermore, there should be a
good professional relationship between the academic staff involved and the academic calendars
should be aligned. Although, this way of working also comes with some challenges, such as
dealing with delays, communication problems, etc., it can be said that international teaming
projects have been very successful. “They have provided an enhanced educational experience for
students and enjoyable link between academic staff at the two institutions. In the six months of
working alongside each other (albeit 5000 mile distance for most of the time) the students had
built up mutual trust and respect to produce very effective teams. Working with students from
different social, cultural and educational backgrounds did not lead to any discernible problems.”
These examples show that, also in air transport education, international education becomes
possible thanks to the technological developments and showed to be rewarding for the students
as well as the educational institutes.
To illustrate this, it can be added that also IATA works with distance learning technology. They
refer to several courses being available as e-books or for e-learning. This distance learning is
possible for courses in International aviation training, international travel and tourism training
and international cargo training.
3.2.4 Changes in aviation-related training: some examples
As stated before, aviation today faces a series of pressing challenges. It has to improve its safety
record in the face of traffic growth, address the need for increased innovation, ensure air
transport’s more sustainable and environmental-friendly future, take advantage of the latest
technologies and processes to make aircraft more secure, etc. (ICAO, 2011b, p.3)
ICAO stresses the fact that more effective training has an important role in pursuing these
challenges. Therefore it has begun to coordinate the sector-wide response through its Next
Generation Aviation Professionals (NGAP) initiative. Some of these programs, such as the Multi-
crew Pilot License MPL, are very successful.(ICAO, 2011b, p.3)
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:43 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
The New ICAO Training Policy focuses on competence-based training, putting the focus on
performing, rather than just knowing (ICAO, 2011a, p.3). The Multi-crew Pilot License (MPL)
approach is a good example since it focuses on the competencies required of a co-pilot on a
transport-category airplane. It is a multi-disciplinary approach that brings together expertise in
training, licensing and organizational certification. Unlike in flight training which is a global
methodology that focuses on achieving quality objectives, in the approach of MPL, performance
benchmarks are developed against a detailed job task analysis, partially specific to each air
carrier. Continuous assessment of the trainees against these established baselines bypasses
other traditional skill assessments (e.g. written examinations and flight tests)which only provide
a momentary snapshot of a trainee’s ability to perform.(ICAO, 2011b, p.6)
Furthermore, the International Federation of Air Line Pilots’ Associations (IFALPA) has
recognized that relying solely on a pilot’s technical knowledge and skills it not sufficient to safely
operate complex aircraft in today’s flying environment. Crew Resource Management (CRM)
was developed over 30 years ago to help address this issue. It can improve the proficiency and
competency of individual pilots and flight crews as a whole, especially when it is implemented as
an error management strategy. It is a define set of skills that supports pilot technical and
decision–making flying capabilities by providing them with the skills needed to address human
error by managing resources within an organized operational system. (ICAO, 2011b, p.13) It is
important to note that CRM is not just aircrew-centric; it does not start and stop with the captain
or crew. Effective CRM must be embedded within the cockpit and safety culture of the airline.
(ICAO, 2011b, p.14)
Air Navigation Service Providers seek to enhance their existing training to anticipate the
significant technological and operational evolution in virtually every aspect of the world’s Air
Traffic Management (ATM) system. For air traffic controllers, training is a career-long activity.
They face requirements for periodic training to refresh their knowledge, as well as training on
new equipment and procedures implemented throughout their careers. Combinations of
academic, simulator and on-the-job training are created and adapted to meet the specific needs
of the provider. It is important to provide quality and comprehensive training to the current
controller workforce on new technologies, tools and procedures to implement new systems and
simultaneously continuing to operate the air traffic control system and devoting conservable
training resources to ensure adequate numbers of new controllers to meet future demands.
(ICAO, 2011b, p.38)
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:44of 165
The ATC production line in its simplest form can be described in three key phases: requirement
and selection; basic skills training; and on-the-job training (OJT). Airways New Zealand
developed its proprietary Total Control simulator with the objective of improving training
quality and safety while reducing overall ATC training costs and timetables. (ICAO, 2011a, p.46)
Also in Denmark, the training of air traffic controllers with the help of simulators has been the
practice for many years. (ICAO, 2011b, p.41)
Also maintenance training has to be optimized since, over the past four decades, a great deal
has changed in terms of how effective maintenance training programs are provided and
measured. Methodologies have evolved from classroom presentations via computer-based
training modules to on-site training with portable training media. This in turn has helped realize
the “virtual classroom” where even complex troubleshooting tasks can be simulated. The role of
a professional training staff has also changed; from the old-styled lecturer to engaged instructor,
to a personal coach of sorts and, more recently, trainers have evolved into a type of “media and
information manager”. (ICAO, 2011a, p.4) Lufthansa Technical Training GmbH uses the concept
of “Blended Training”. The concept has three key elements: a competency based-approach that is
student-paced and instructor-guided; a fully-integrated use of the most state-of-the-art training
and simulation media; and the availability of training notes available digitally and
complemented by a quick-reference handbook that features high-quality system schematics and
concise system descriptions. (ICAO, 2011a, p.6)
Within IATA, the IATA Training and Development Institute (ITDI) is concerned with education.
ITDI believes in the power of the blended learning concept. There is an in-company training
delivery model to reduce corporate training costs, foster innovative thinking and reduce the
environmental impact of travel. The forum-style setting for classroom and onsite courses fosters
a dynamic and engaging learning experience geared to improving business results. In addition,
every year ITDI brings to market innovative e-learning programs that offer students flexibility
for distance learning. (ICAO, 2011a, p.50)
Moreover, aircraft manufacturers offer engineering students, in coordination with their
universities, stays (typically of 6-12 months) to perform relatively detailed technical work as an
assessment of skills and selection tool for recruitement.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:45 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
4 Task 3.2: Framework for the assessment of competence gaps
4.1 Basic definitions
Before describing the goal of the framework for the assessment of competence gaps and defining
how the framework will be constituted, it is important that there is a clear understanding of the
following concepts: knowledge, skill and competence. Knowledge
Knowledge can be defined as the "inferred capability which makes possible the successful
performance of a class of tasks that could not be performed before [a] learning [process] was
undertaken" (Gagné, 1962, pp 355). In turn, a learning process can be understood as capacity of
an individual, in face of a set of stimulus, to acquire the capability to solve a given class of tasks.
As such, knowledge is the outcome of the interaction between an individual's capacity to learn
(intelligence) and the opportunity for the action (Winterton et al, 2005).
Knowledge can be segmented according to its purpose and nature. General knowledge refers to
knowledge that is necessary for a person's daily activity and interaction with others in society.
This type of knowledge is irrespective of any occupational context. Conversely, specific
knowledge refers to knowledge gained in a specific context to meet specific requirements or
conduct specific tasks. In addition, knowledge is cumulative and built over time based on
previous acquired knowledge, as individual gains an explicit and factual knowledge on a given
task (declarative knowledge), which will support the capability of utilizing the knowledge in
new tasks and different contexts (procedural knowledge) (Winterton et al, 2005).
SkillSkill can be defined as "goal-directed, well-organized behavior that is acquired
through practice and performed with economy of effort" (Proctor and Dutta, 1995, 18). In other
words, skill refers to how well an individual is able to execute a given task. Typically, skill is a
goal-oriented behavior denoting that it is manifested in response of an external demand. It is
also a well-organized behavior that exhibits structure and a coherent set of patterns. Skill is
acquired and improved over time through repetition and the efforts and cognitive demands
reduce as the skill improves (Winterton et al, 2005).
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:46of 165
Different types of skills have been identified, depending on the nature of the external demand,
namely:
Perceptual skill is related with an individual's ability to make distinctions and judgments;
Response skill is related with an individual's ability to promptly react to a specific
demand. This type of skill can be improved and, eventually, becomes automatic, if
practiced over time.
Motor skill is related with an individual's ability to perform some motor-related
behavior, such as speed and accuracy of physical movements, or dexterity. Indeed, this
type of skill was one of the firsts to be identified (Swift, 1904, 1910, Bryan and Harter,
1897 and 1899)
Problem-solving skill is related with an individual's ability to solve new (or unknown)
tasks. This skill is dependent upon intellectual and mental models.
Competence
There are several definitions in the literature on the concept of competence and, the related
term, competency. They may be ascribed to different epistemological assumptions, cultural
differences or, even, differences in the context of the study (or nature of object of analysis).
Mansfield has identified three different contexts where the notion can be applied, being:
A characteristic that describes how an individual performs (and fulfills) their job's
demands. The better one meets (and fulfills) their job's demands, the higher their
competence will be. This notion is focused on the outcome of an individual's job's
activity.
Individual's attributes and traits to meet the job's demands. This notion is focused on the
individual's intrinsic properties.
Task that an individual does, such as job/task. The tasks are defined by the type of
demands of the job.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:47 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
For the purpose of this study, Woodruffe’s (1991) definition was adopted on competence and
competency. The author defines competence as
“a (job’s) task that an individual can perform, and competency as an individual’s capability
(or characteristic) of doing well a given (job’s) task”.
This definition is supported by other authors, such as Winterton, Delamare-Le Deist and
Stringfellow, Hartle, or Tate. The definition of competence has a functional nature related to the
properties (and functions) of a task or job; while competency has a behavioral nature related to
what individual can achieve.
An individual’s competence is built over time, and several factors influence its development,
namely: ability, knowledge, understanding, skill, action, experience or motivation (Weinert,
2001). Among these, skill is a fundamental prerequisite.
Interaction between Knowledge, Skill and Competence
Although knowledge, skill and competence refer to different psychological components of
human development, they influence each other and their development is determined by the
others. It should be noted that as with any psychological component, many other factors
influence their development. For the purposes of this research, it is relevant to highlight the
cascade of influence between key components (Figure 12). An individual's intellectual
capabilities are required for the development of knowledge and the practical utilization and
“operationalization” of knowledge is condition for developing skills. All these components are
necessary prerequisites for the development of competences.
Figure 12: Interaction between Knowledge, Skill and Competence
When looking at the competences needed to fulfil a task, these competences can be described
into very much detail. Doing this in this project would lead us too far, therefore it is important to
add that competences will be looked at on an aggregate level. The project focuses on the demand
for employees for the important positions, i.e. key functions, within the companies (where
competences which cannot be taught in general educational programs are needed); the
education of those employees is most crucial for the industry.
Intellectual capability
Knowledge Skills Competences
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:48of 165
As mentioned in the scope, the EDUCAIR-project will approach four types of companies;
airports, airlines, companies involved in air transport management and
manufacturers/suppliers. For each of those companies, the important job categories were
identified. These categories hold key functions; i.e. jobs with a direct relation to the primary
process in the organization for which the skills cannot be acquired in a general education.
Therefore, positions within finance & control, human resources, communication, legal affairs,
etc. will not be considered. For each of those categories, the competences are described on an
aggregate level.
4.2 Goal of this framework
As stated in the DoW, there is a risk of mismatch between the prospective employees’ competences
and the market’s actual requirements. If such a mismatch is excessive and not addressed, there is
the danger of creating a significant competence gap.
The aim of EDUCAIR is to improve the match between needs in human resources and the
educational and training offer. Therefore, the EDUCAIR project will start by exploring the roots of
the eventual divergence between the demand and the supply of competences, in order to better
understand the actual dynamics and extend of the competence gap.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:49 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
4.3 Outlook of the framework
To explore the sources and the extent of the competence gap, an assessment framework was
drawn up (Figure 13).
Figure 13: Four gaps framework
Source: DoW, EDUCAIR project
In the framework, four (potential) gaps can be distinguished:
Gap 1 - Gap between the competences that the employees need and the actual
competences of the students (e.g. to what extent are the student's competences actually
useful in their working daily activities?)
Gap 2 - Gap between the knowledge that the companies need and the actual
competences of the employees (e.g. to what extent do the employees' competences
actually fit in their companies' competences requirements?)
Gap 3 - Gap between the knowledge the universities generate and the actual
competences of the students (e.g. to what extent are the competences that the
Universities aim to build actually acquired by the students when graduating?, is the
knowledge generated in the research transferred in the courses?)
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:50of 165
Gap 4 - Gap between the knowledge the companies need and the knowledge the
universities have (i.e. is the universities' research and teaching activities of relevance for
the companies?)
4.4 Working with the framework
In the EDUCAIR project, we try to grasp in what extent there are gaps between the four different
stakeholders (companies, employees, universities & students). We will do this, by using surveys,
addressed to the four stakeholders; so we set up a survey to the industry on the one hand and
the educational institutes on the other hand. Table 5 gives an overview of who will be
approached as respondents. The upper panel shows which companies/institutes will be
addressed, while below the actual targeted respondents are listed.
Table 5: Overview of target group of survey
INDUSTRY EDUCATION
Airlines Airports Companies involved in air traffic
management (such as air traffic control organisations)
Aircraft manufacturers and suppliers
Universities and colleges with engineering programmes involving air transport/aeronautics
Universities and colleges with research and PhD programmes in air transport/aeronautics
Vocational training institutes Professional training institutes
Here we address
1. Managers of new employees and people recruiting new employees
2. New employees (max. 5 years’ experience)
3. The employees/professionals (with more than 5 years’ experience)
Here we address
1. Heads of departments related to air transport/aeronautics OR full professors
2. Graduating students only
Figure 14 shows what will be gauged in the survey and how this is linked to the specific targeted
respondents. This is aligned with the assessment framework (Figure 13). The link between
Table 5 and Figure 14 is shown by use of colors.
Contract:284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Contract: TCP8-GA-2009-234082
Page:51 of 156 Date: 11 May 2012
Figure 14: Overview of different surveys in line with the educational gaps
In the survey to the companies (industry survey - 1), we want to find out which competences the employees need to have in the eyes of the companies and whether the existing employees, incl. “new” and “old” employees have them or not
In the survey to the employees (industry survey 2-3), we want to find out what career paths the employees have and which competences they have or have acquired for the job.
In the survey to the employees (industry survey - 2-3), we want to find out which competences the employees actually had when starting their work and whether the employees were satisfied with them.
In the survey to the students (education survey - 2), we try to find out which competences students think they have that are needed for their career.
In the survey to the companies (industry survey - 1), we want to find out whether the industry is satisfied with the number of courses that are offered (quantitative) as well as their quality concerning the competences that are taught (qualitative)
In the survey to the educational institutions (education survey - 1), we want to find out whether the universities believe that they live up to the expectations of the companies, regarding the courses taught.
In the survey to the educational institutions (education survey - 1) we want to find out which competences the students should acquire through their education.
In the survey to the students (education survey - 2) we want to find out which competences the students actually acquired through their education and whether they are satisfied with them.
Legend:
----= industry survey addressed to managers of new employees and people recruiting new employees
----= industry survey addressed to employees
Legend: ----= education survey addressed to heads of departments or full professors ----= education survey addressed to students
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:52of 165
4.5 Survey methodology
In this chapter, the survey that will be performed in the EDUCAIR-project is described. First,
the calculation of the sample size is given. Section 4.5.2 explains how the survey is structured,
while the questionnaires are listed in Section 4.5.3. The last section of this chapter describes
how the gaps will be identified by using the different questionnaires.
4.5.1 Sample size
When processing the results of the survey, more general conclusions about the industry and
educational institutions have to be drawn. To ensure that these conclusions are correct, the
sample that is surveyed has to represent the population. Therefore, the correct sample size
has to be calculated. To do so, one has to have a view on the size of the population. Literature
review performed in work packages 4, 5 and 6 will look into this topic.
After knowing the size of the population, the sample size can be calculated by applying a
formula. Here, three criteria will have to be determined: the level of precision (or sampling
error), the level of confidence and the degree of variability in the attributes being measured.
The sampling error is the range in which the true value of the population is estimated to be.
The confidence level is expressed as a percentage and represents how often the true
percentage of the population who would pick an answer lies within the confidence interval.
The degree of variability refers to the distribution of attributes in the population; the more
heterogeneous a population, the larger the sample size is required to obtain a given level of
precision. (Israel, 1992)
Calculating the appropriate sample size can be done by using the following equation:
o
Where no is the sample size; Z² is the abscissa of the normal curve that cuts off an area at
the tails, e desired level of precision (sampling error), p is the estimated proportion of an
attribute that is present in the population and q is 1-p. The value for Z can be found in
statistical tables which contain the area under the normal curve. If the variability in the
population is not known, maximum variability (p=.5) can be assumed.
However, sample sizes can also be calculated using a simplified formula:
Where n is the sample size, N is the population size and e is the level of precision (sample
error). A 95% confidence level and P=.5 are assumed. (Israel, 1992)
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 53 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Given the fact that in the survey four different groups will be approached, using the technique
of stratified sampling seems adequate. This method has several advantages. It is
advantageous to sample each subpopulation independently based on the data structure.
Furthermore, stratified sampling allows to ensure that estimates can be made with equal
accuracy in different parts of the stratum, and those comparisons of strata can be made with
equal statistical power. Moreover, stratified sampling can also estimate the situation in each
stratum on top of the population situation.
In this method of sampling the population is divided into non-overlapping groups known as
strata from which random samples are taken.
Stratum 1: Companies in the air transport/aeronautics sector, i.e. managers of new
employees and people recruiting new employees
Stratum 2: Employees working in the air transport or aeronautics sector
Stratum 3: Universities, i.e. heads of departments or full professors
Stratum 4: Students, i.e. graduating air transport/aeronautics students
For each of these strata, the sample size will be defined.
The sample size will be determined based upon tables stated in the paper of Israel (1992)
(see Table 6 and Table 7). In these tables, the confidence level was set to 95% and the degree
of variability (P) at .5 which indicates maximum variability in a population.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:54of 165
Table 6: Sample size for ±3%, ±5%, ±7% and ±10% Precision Levels Where Confidence Level is 95% and P=.5.
Size of population
Sample size (n) for precision (e) of:
±3% ±5% ±7% ±10%
500 a 222 145 83
600 a 240 152 86
700 a 255 158 88
800 a 267 163 89
900 a 277 166 90
1,000 a 286 169 91
2,000 714 333 185 95
3,000 811 353 191 97
4,000 870 364 194 98
5,000 909 370 196 98
6,000 938 375 197 98
7,000 959 378 198 99
8,000 976 381 199 99
9,000 989 383 200 99
10,000 1,000 385 200 99
15,000 1,034 390 201 99
20,000 1,053 392 204 100
25,000 1,064 394 204 100
50,000 1,087 397 204 100
100,000 1,099 398 204 100
>100,000 1,111 400 204 100
a = Assumption of normal population is poor (Yamane, 1967). The entire population should be sampled.
Source: Israel, 1992
Table 7: Sample size for ±5%, ±7% and ±10% Precision Levels Where Confidence Level is 95% and P=.5.
Size of population
Sample size (n) for precision (e) of:
±5% ±7% ±10%
100 81 67 51
125 96 78 56
150 110 86 61
175 122 94 64
200 134 101 67
225 144 107 70
250 154 112 72
275 163 117 74
300 172 121 76
325 180 125 77
350 187 129 78
375 194 132 80
400 201 135 81
425 207 138 82
450 212 140 82
Source: Israel, 1992
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 55 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Stratum 1: Companies
According to literature, there were 115 airports with more than 1,500,000 passengers per year
in the area of EU27 in 2010. Furthermore, 96 airlines, 6 aircraft manufacturers and 10 helicopter
manufacturers were operating in 2010. During the same year, 53 authorities/regulatory bodies
and 20 consultants were active. 20 companies performed ground handling activities while 10
companies provided IT services. ATC was carried out by 27 companies. This gives a total number
of 357 active companies in the air transport sector.
The scope of the EDUCAIR project is limited to only airlines, airports, companies involved in air
transport management and manufacturers/suppliers. Therefore, the population taken into
account for stratum 1 sums up to 244 companies.
Looking at Table 7 and taking into account a precision level of ±5%, the sample size for stratum
1 (companies) is set on 154.
Stratum 2: Employees
A study of Oxford Economics gives an overview of the employment worldwide and in different
parts of the world. On the one hand, the study mentions the employment directly created by the
air transport industry in 2007. But also the total employment in aviation [direct], its supply
chain [indirect] and the spending of the employees [induced] of 2007 and its growth by 2026 is
given. (see Table 8)
Table 8: Overview of employment in the air transport sector
EMPLOYMENT Direct, indirect & induced
(in thousands)
Directly created by the air transport industry
(in thousands)
2007 2026 2007
Africa 450 700 150
Asia-Pacific 3,000 5,000 1,200
Europe 4,500 7,000 1,600
Latin America & The Caribbean
600 1,000 225
Middle East 400 750 150
North America 6,000 8,000 2,300
WORLDWIDE 15,000 23,000 5,500
The study shows that, in 2007, 1.6 million European workers were employed directly in the
industry.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:56of 165
A study of the Air Transport Action Group states that the number of jobs created directly by the
air transport industry is estimated to have reached 1.9 million in 2010. Almost 28% (519,000) of
those employees work for airlines or handling agents while 12% (220,000) is employed by
airport operators. Government agencies, active at the airport account for 44.5% (827,000) of
employment and the remaining 15.5% (290,000) are employed in the civil aerospace sector.
(see Figure 15)
Figure 15: Overview of employment in the air transport sector
Again, the
EDUCAIR project only looks at certain sub-sectors (airlines, airports, companies involved in air
transport management and manufacturers/suppliers) and at functions which require specific
skills, which cannot be acquired in a general education and have a direct relation to the primary
process in the organization of these sub-sectors. The population reflecting the scope of the
EDUCAIR project, on which the sample size will be based, is estimated to be 10% (190,000) of
direct employment of the sector.
Looking at Table 6 and taking into account a precision level of ±5%, the sample size for stratum
2 (employees) is set on 400.
Stratum 4: Students
The population of the students consists of all graduating air transport/aeronautics students
within EU27.
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 57 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Stratum 3: Universities
For the universities, a different method will be applied: the EDUCAIR-project will try to receive
input from the three most important universities of each EU27-country instead of calculating the
sample size. This divergent approach is taken as a good regional spread of universities is
necessary.
4.5.2 Structure of the survey
As can be seen in Figure 14, the survey will be divided into two separate surveys (industry &
education), with each to different sub-surveys (companies – employees & educational
institutions – students). This leads to four different question sets. Each of these question sets has
one general part, with questions regarding the background of the respondent.
The following part will contain questions to assess whether there are competence gaps.
Different subsections serve to assess different (potential) gaps: “Recruitment”, “Graduating
students”, “Current educational offer”, “Competences needed in the sector”, “Cooperation
between industry and educational institutions”, “Educational background & career path”.
For some questions, a likert scale of five is used (1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither
disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.) as suggested by Dillman, Smyth and Christian
(2009, p. 137).
The last part will be reserved for any other comments or remarks.
Since the second part of the surveys are built the same way (using the same subsections), the
questions of these subsections can then be compared to assess whether there are competence
gaps (see section 4.5.4).
4.5.3 Different surveys
Below, the 4 different surveys are listed. As soon as the surveys are finalized, the questions will
be put online, so that a link can be sent around by e-mail. The surveys will also be performed
online. This has several advantages: more (potential) respondents can be reached and the
questionnaire can be adapted (through skip-logit) to each respondent which reduces the size of
and time spent on each questionnaire.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:58of 165
4.5.3.1 INDUSTRY SURVEY - Companies
This survey is conducted by the consortium of the EDUCAIR project, a European 7th Framework
Programme. The objective of the EDUCAIR project is to improve the match between needs in
human resources in the European air transport and aeronautics sector and the educational and
training offer. More information about the EDUCAIR project can be found on the project website:
http://www.educair.eu/
The target audience of this survey are professionals involved in the management and
recruitment of new employees. The survey aims to collect quantitative and qualitative
information on the demand for graduates in the air transport and aeronautics industry and input
on educational topics and industry-education relationships.
This survey is structured into three parts. The first part contains general questions to get a view
on the background of the respondent. The second part is divided into several sections: questions
about recruitment (A), about the current educational offer (B), about the competences needed in
the sector (C) and about the cooperation between the industry and the educational institutes
(D). In the last part of this survey, you can provide any comments or remarks you may have. The
survey takes 30 minutes to complete.
Information gathered is for internal use only, and will not be shared with any third parties. All
your answers to this survey are private and confidential and will only be used within EDUCAIR.
The information provided will be used for statistical purpose only and no nominal data will be
kept in the database.
Respondents are identified for the single purpose of clarification of answers.
PART 1: BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT
1. Name of company/organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Type of company/organization/institution (multiple choice; select one)
Airport
Airline
Air Transport Management
Manufacturer/ Supplier
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 59 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
3. Position in the company/organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Department (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Country (open response)
In case of multinational company, please indicate the country where you work.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART 2a: RECRUITMENT
6. Which is the market addressed by your company? (multiple choice; select one)
Local
Regional
National
Worldwide
7. Is there mobility of employees along company branches in different geographical areas (in
case of multiple addressed areas)? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please describe _________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
8. How many employees does your company have? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:60of 165
9. How many new employees/graduates do you expect to hire the next 1, 3, and 5 years? In
which field (e.g. planning & control)?
(open response; several answers possible)
1 year _______________________________________________________________________________________________
3 years ______________________________________________________________________________________________
5 years ______________________________________________________________________________________________
10. To what extent do you agree that the different subject areas are important for recruiting
new employees for key functions in your company.
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
ENGINEERING
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Aerospace
Chemical
Civil
Communication
Electrical
Electronics
Industrial
Information Systems & Computer
Materials
Mechanical
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 61 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
VOCATIONAL PROGRAMMES
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Pilot
Air Traffic Controller
Aircraft Maintenance Mechanic
Aeronautical Station Operator
Flight Operations Officer
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
OTHER DISCIPLINES
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Management/ Business Economics
Law
Economics/ Public Policy
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:62of 165
11. To what extent do you agree that the qualifications below are important when hiring
graduates/new employees and to what extent do you agree that the graduates/new
employees possess those criteria (before hiring)?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
EDUCATION & WORKING EXPERIENCE
Important for hiring? Possessed by graduates/new
employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
University degree
University degree in air transport/ aeronautics
Previous working experience
Previous working experience related to air transport/ aeronautics
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
SKILLS (e.g. attribute to better fulfill functions and tasks
Important for hiring? Possessed by graduates/new
employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Problem solving
Analytical background
Technical background
Theoretical
Oral and written communications
Leadership
Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 63 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
12. If you have any additional comments on selection criteria and recruitment profiles, please
specify below (open response)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. If you have any additional comments on recruitment methods, please specify below
(open response)
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. What is the percentage of new recruited employees with
(percentage of employees)
Air transport/aeronautics education ________________________________________________________
Air transport/aeronautics work experience _________________________________________________
15. What is the most typical level of prior air transport/aeronautics related experience?
(multiple choice; select one)
None
Introduction to air transport/aeronautics as part of a transportation course
Semester-long university course in air transport/aeronautics engineering
Participation in air transport/aeronautics research project
Special or certificate program in air transport/aeronautics engineering
Air transport/aeronautics internship or co-op
Other; please specify _____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:64of 165
16. How much of the employees are working in key functions?
(number or percentage of employees)
The ‘key functions’, under the scope of the EDUCAIR Project, encompass those ones which require employees
with higher education in air transport/aeronautics related areas, being either
Engineering (for employees with degree on the 1st or 2nd level of Bologna);
Engineering, Management/Business, Economics, Law, or Economics/ Public Policy (for
employees with degree on the 3rd level of Bologna, i.e. PhD programs).
Furthermore, they also encompass those functions which require employees with vocational, professional or
corporate training programmes in air transport/aeronautics related areas.
(These programmes prepare trainees/employees for jobs which are based on manual or practical activities,
traditionally non-academic and related to a specific occupation and training leading up to obtaining a license
in the air transport sector. These programmes may also be tailor-made for the employees of a company.)
Please describe the key functions and the respective number of employees.
Area Function Number or percentage Airlines Cockpit Crew
Technics & Engineering
Planning, Control & ICT
Airports Infrastructure design (airside, landside & terminal)
Building & Construction of infrastructure (airside, landside & terminal)
Infrastructure planning
Handling (of passengers, freight & vehicles)
Emergency planning
Maintenance (airside & terminal)
Environmental control
Security (of people & cargo)
Air Traffic Control and Management
Area Control
Approach Control
Tower Control
Other ATC operations
ATM
Manufacturers – Suppliers
Research & Technology
Operations
Engineering
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 65 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
17. Which are the main sources for entry-level employees (0-3 years of experience) to key
functions? (rank from 1 to 4 in order of importance; 1 is highest)
University
Competing company or industry
Military
Other; please specify _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
18. Does your company have any formalized training in air transport/aeronautics topics for
entry-level employees in key functions? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
What are the top three goals of the training? (open response)
1. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
2. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
3. ___________________________________________________________________________________________
What is the overall duration and cost of the training? (open response)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No
19. What new competences does your company expect entry-level employees in key functions
to need within the next five to ten years? (open response)
1. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:66of 165
20. What are the greatest challenges for your company to attract entry-level employees to key
functions? (rank from 1 to 7 in order of importance; 1 is highest)
Salaries
Work-life balance issues
Lack of visibility of the air transport/aeronautics sector on campus
Lack of knowledge of the air transport/aeronautics sector amongst students
Image of air transport/aeronautics
Perceived work requirements or type of work
Other; please specify _________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
21. Which are the planned improvements to address recruitment challenges or expectations for
strategy changes in the near future? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
22. Over the past 5 years, how many entry-level employees in key functions have left within
(open response, percentage)
1 year after hiring _________________________________________________________________________________
3 years after hiring ________________________________________________________________________________
23. Does your company conduct formalized exit interviews? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
24. What are the three most common reasons for leaving? (open response)
1. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. ____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 67 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
25. How does your company improve retention?
(multiple choice; select all that apply and rank in order of importance; 1 is highest)
(____) Increased monetary rewards
(____) Increased organizational flexibility in work-life balance
(____) Employee support systems
(____) Better opportunities for professional development
(____) Formal mentoring programs
(____) Education reimbursement
(____) Other; please specify ________________________________________________________________
_______________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:68of 165
PART 2b: CURRENT EDUCATIONAL OFFER
26. Are you aware of air transport/aeronautical related education provided by universities?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please indicate the type of education that you are aware of.
(multiple choice; select all that apply and please describe)
Course in Bachelor program _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A Bachelor program ______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Course in Master program _______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A Master program ________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
General university course (not part of a Bachelor/Master program) ________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A post-graduate research/PhD program _______________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Professional courses ______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No
27. Please indicate the teaching mode that you are aware of.
(multiple choice; select all that apply and please describe)
General classroom learning
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Distance learning
Distance learning is defined as collective education through internet-based tools.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
eLearning
eLearning is defined as individual education through internet-based tools.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Blended learning
Blended learning is defined as distance learning where some on-site presence is required.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 69 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
28. Do you believe that there are enough programs/courses available?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Indicate 3 important programs/courses that need to be developed
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
29. Are you satisfied with the available programs/courses?
Yes
No
Please specify your reasons ___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:70of 165
PART 2c: COMPETENCES NEEDED IN THE SECTOR
Please consider the following competences in the air transport/aeronautics domain.
For every competence, please indicate the extent to which you agree that the competences are
relevant for your organizations activities in the air transport/aeronautics sector. And indicate
the extent to which you agree that the graduates/new employees possess those criteria (before
hiring)?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
30. AIRLINE – COCKPIT CREW
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Planning of the flight
On board instrument control
General and radio navigation & communication
Understanding air law & operational procedures
Management of technical aspects
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 71 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
31. AIRLINE – TECHNICS & ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Maintenance and repair of airframe
Maintenance and repair of power plant
Maintenance and repair of on board instruments
Maintenance and repair of navigation and radio communications equipment
Maintenance and repair of auxiliary systems
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
32. AIRLINE – PLANNING, CONTROL & ICT
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Coordination of maintenance
Planning and coordination of operations
Safety management
Flight dispatching
Determination and provision of meteorological circumstances
Ramp planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:72of 165
33. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – DESIGN
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design of airside infrastructure
Design of building and terminal
Design of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
34. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Building & construction of airside infrastructure
Building & construction of building and terminal
Building & construction of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
35. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Master planning
Land use planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 73 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
36. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – HANDLING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Handling of passengers
Handling of freight
Handling of air vehicles
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
37. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – EMERGENCY PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Rescue and fire fighting
Obstacles removal
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
38. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – MAINTENANCE
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airside maintenance
Terminal maintenance
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:74of 165
39. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Noise control
Emission control
Waste maintenance
Wildlife control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
40. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – SECURITY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Security concerning passengers
Security concerning cargo
Security concerning employees
Prevention of intrusion/ unauthorized access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 75 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
41. ATM – AREA CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of Area Control Centre operations
En route aircraft control
Planning & coordination en route air traffic
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
42. ATC – APPROACH CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision & planning approach operations
Provision of terminal radar approach control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:76of 165
43. ATC – TOWER CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of tower operations
On the ground aircraft movements control
Aircraft landing & taking-off control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
44. ATC – OTHER ATC OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Provision of flight information to VFR traffic
Planning and coordination of network capacity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 77 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
45. ATM
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design, development and evaluation of ATC procedures
Design, development and sustainment of ATC systems, product and tools
Management of safety of ATC operations
Management of air traffic capacity and efficiency
Management of interaction of operational controllers with operational environment
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:78of 165
46. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Failure assessment and recognition
Avionics, electronic and electrical systems & EMC
Customer service
Fluid mechanics and acoustics
Propulsion and powerplant
RAMS, human factors & operability
Software design & IT
Structural design
Test engineering
Services solutions
Quality engineering
Production rigs
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 79 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
47. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airline operations appreciation
Components and aircraft architecture
Manufacturing engineering
Maintenance
RAMS, human factors & operability
Governance
Risk management
Composites manufacturing and assembly
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:80of 165
48. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for organizations
activities?
Possessed by graduates/new employees?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Aircraft operability and design maturity integration
Design
Failure assessment and recognition
Stress and structures analysis
Materials and processes
Systems engineering and architecture
Airworthiness and certification
Architecture, integration and in-service support
Systems & electronics engineering
Structural & general engineering
Flight physics
Configuration management
Composites design and stress
Supply management
Lean experts & supply chain quality field engineering
Electrical design/integration
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 81 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
49. Do employees receive incentives to develop their competences through internal or external
courses?
Yes
No
50. Are there additional courses offered by your company to the employees to gain the
competences needed? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART 2d: COOPERATION BETWEEN INDUSTRY AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
51. Is there any cooperation with educational institutes that provide education in air
transport/aeronautics? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
What kind of cooperation? (multiple choice; select all that apply)
Research projects
Guest lectures
Providing educational material
Internships
Financial sponsorship
Funding educational programs
Funding research
Funding faculty or staff positions
Providing endowments
Other; please specify _____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
I do not know
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:82of 165
52. To what extent do you agree that (increased) cooperation between industry and
educational institutes would benefit the air transport/aeronautical sector in the following
topics? 1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Recruitment
Providing basic education in air transport/ aeronautics
Providing specialized education
Industry research/ development
Increasing industry visibility
Innovation and creativity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 83 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
PART 3: OTHER COMMENTS
53. Please provide below any other comments that you might have.
(open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
54. Please indicate whether you are interested in receiving the results of this survey
Yes
Contact details/email __________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Thank you for your participation!
If you want more information about the EDUCAIR project, please visit our website at
http://www.educair.eu/.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:84of 165
4.5.3.2 INDUSTRY SURVEY - Employees
This survey is conducted by the consortium of the EDUCAIR project, a European 7th Framework
Programme. The objective of project is to improve the match between needs in human resources
in the European air transport and aeronautics sector and the educational and training offer.
More information about the EDUCAIR project can be found on the project website:
http://www.educair.eu/
The target audience of this survey are employees of companies active in the air transport and
aeronautics sector. The survey aims to collect quantitative and qualitative information on the
demand for graduates in the air transport and aeronautics industry and input on educational
topics and industry-education relationships.
This survey holds three parts. The first part contains general questions to get a view on the
background of the respondent. The second part is divided into several sections: questions about
your educational background and career path (A), about the current educational offer (B), about
the competences needed in the sector (C) and about the cooperation between the industry and
the educational institutes (D). In the last part of this survey, you can leave any comments or
remarks you might have. The survey takes 30 minutes to complete.
Information gathered is for internal use only, and will not be shared with any third parties. All
your answers to this survey are private and confidential and will only be used within EDUCAIR.
The information provided will be used for statistical purpose only and no nominal data will be
kept in the database.
Respondents are identified for the single purpose of clarification of answers.
PART 1: BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT
1. Age (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Nationality (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. English as first language? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 85 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
4. Gender (multiple choice; select one)
Male
Female
5. Name of company/organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Type of company/organization/institution (multiple choice; select one)
Airport
Airline
Air Transport Management
Manufacturer/Supplier
7. Position in the company/organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. Department (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. Country (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART 2a: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND & CAREER PATH
10. What is your educational background (highest degree)? (multiple choice; select one)
High school
Bachelor degree
Master degree
PhD
Vocational/professional school
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:86of 165
11. What was the level of air transport/aeronautical education? (multiple choice; select one)
Course in Bachelor program
A Bachelor program
Course in Master program
A Master program
General university course (not part of a Bachelor/Master program)
A post-graduate research/PhD program
Professional course
12. Please indicate the teaching mode of the level of air transport/aeronautical education
(multiple choice; select all that apply)
General classroom learning
Distance learning
Distance learning is defined as collective education through internet-based tools.
eLearning
eLearning is defined as individual education through internet-based tools.
Blended learning
Blended learning is defined as distance learning where some on-site presence is required.
learning where on-site presence is required.
13. What was your graduation major? (multiple choice; select one)
Aerospace engineering
Chemical engineering
Civil engineering
Communications
Electrical engineering
Electronics engineering
Industrial engineering
Information Systems & Computer engineering
Materials engineering
Mechanical engineering
Pilot license
Air Traffic Controller license
Aircraft Maintenance Mechanic license
Aeronautical Station Operator license
Flight Operations Officer license
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 87 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
14. Is your current function in this company a key function? (multiple choice; select one)
The ‘key functions’, under the scope of the EDUCAIR Project, encompass those ones which require employees
with higher education in air transport/aeronautics related areas, being either
Engineering (for employees with degree on the 1st or 2nd level of Bologna);
Engineering, Management/Business, Economics, Law, or Economics/ Public Policy (for
employees with degree on the 3rd level of Bologna, i.e. PhD programs).
Furthermore, they also encompass those functions which require employees with vocational, professional or
corporate training programmes in air transport/aeronautics related areas.
(These programmes prepare trainees/employees for jobs which are based on manual or practical activities,
traditionally non-academic and related to a specific occupation and training leading up to obtaining a license
in the air transport sector. These programmes may also be tailor-made for the employees of a company.)
Yes
Area Function Number or percentage Airlines Cockpit Crew
Technics & Engineering
Planning, Control & ICT
Airports Infrastructure design (airside, landside & terminal)
Building & Construction of infrastructure (airside, landside & terminal)
Infrastructure planning
Handling (of passengers, freight & vehicles)
Emergency planning
Maintenance (airside & terminal)
Environmental control
Security (of people & cargo)
Air Traffic Control and Management
Area Control
Approach Control
Tower Control
Other ATC operations
ATM
Manufacturers - Suppliers
Research & Technology
Operations
Engineering
No
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:88of 165
15. For how many years have you been performing this function? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
16. To what extent do you agree that the qualifications below are important for jobs in your
company?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
EDUCATION & WORKING EXPERIENCE
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
University degree
University degree in air transport/ aeronautics
Previous working experience
Previous working experience related to air transport/ aeronautics
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 89 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
SKILLS
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Problem solving
Analytical background
Technical background
Theoretical background
Oral and written communications
Leadership
Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
17. Please specify and rank what you valuate the most in your current job?
(open response; most valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
18. Please specify and rank what you valuate the least in your current job?
(open response; least valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:90of 165
PART 2b: CURRENT EDUCATIONAL OFFER
19. Are you aware of air transport/aeronautical related education provided by universities?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please indicate the type of education that you are aware of.
(multiple choice; select all that apply and please describe)
Course in Bachelor program _____________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A Bachelor program ______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Course in Master program _______________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A Master program ________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
General university course (not part of a Bachelor/Master program) ________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
A post-graduate research/PhD program _______________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Professional courses ______________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No
20. Please indicate the teaching mode that you are aware of.
(multiple choice; select all that apply and please describe)
General classroom learning
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Distance learning
Distance learning is defined as collective education through internet-based tools.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
eLearning
eLearning is defined as individual education through internet-based tools.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Blended learning
Blended learning is defined as distance learning where some on-site presence is required.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 91 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
21. Do you believe that there are enough programs/courses available?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Indicate 3 important programs/courses that need to be developed
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
22. Are you satisfied with the available programs/courses?
Yes
No
Please specify your reasons ___________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:92of 165
PART 2c: COMPETENCES NEEDED IN THE SECTOR
Please consider the following competences in the air transport/aeronautics domain.
For every competence, please indicate the extent to which you agree that the competences are
relevant for your activities in the air transport/aeronautics sector and indicate the extent to
which you agree that you possessed those when you graduated?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
23. AIRLINE – COCKPIT CREW
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Planning of the flight
On board instrument control
General and radio navigation & communication
Understanding air law & operational procedures
Management of technical aspects
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 93 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
24. AIRLINE – TECHNICS & ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Maintenance and repair of airframe
Maintenance and repair of power plant
Maintenance and repair of on board instruments
Maintenance and repair of navigation and radio communications equipment
Maintenance and repair of auxiliary systems
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
25. AIRLINE – PLANNING, CONTROL & ICT
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Coordination of maintenance
Planning and coordination of operations
Safety management
Flight dispatching
Determination and provision of meteorological circumstances
Ramp planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:94of 165
26. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – DESIGN
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design of airside infrastructure
Design of building and terminal
Design of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
27. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Building & construction of airside infrastructure
Building & construction of building and terminal
Building & construction of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
28. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Master planning
Land use planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 95 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
29. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – HANDLING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Handling of passengers
Handling of freight
Handling of air vehicles
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
30. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – EMERGENCY PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Rescue and fire fighting
Obstacles removal
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
31. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – MAINTENANCE
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airside maintenance
Terminal maintenance
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:96of 165
32. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Noise control
Emission control
Waste maintenance
Wildlife control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
33. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – SECURITY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Security concerning passengers
Security concerning cargo
Security concerning employees
Prevention of intrusion/ unauthorized access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 97 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
34. ATM – AREA CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of Area Control Centre operations
En route aircraft control
Planning & coordination en route air traffic
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
35. ATC – APPROACH CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision & planning approach operations
Provision of terminal radar approach control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:98of 165
36. ATC – TOWER CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of tower operations
On the ground aircraft movements control
Aircraft landing & taking-off control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
37. ATC – OTHER ATC OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Provision of flight information to VFR traffic
Planning and coordination of network capacity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 99 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
38. ATM
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design, development and evaluation of ATC procedures
Design, development and sustainment of ATC systems, product and tools
Management of safety of ATC operations
Management of air traffic capacity and efficiency
Management of interaction of operational controllers with operational environment
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:100of 165
39. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Failure assessment and recognition
Avionics, electronic and electrical systems & EMC
Customer service
Fluid mechanics and acoustics
Propulsion and powerplant
RAMS, human factors & operability
Software design & IT
Structural design
Test engineering
Services solutions
Quality engineering
Production rigs
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 101 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
40. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airline operations appreciation
Components and aircraft architecture
Manufacturing engineering
Maintenance
RAMS, human factors & operability
Governance
Risk management
Composites manufacturing and assembly
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:102of 165
41. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Relevant for your activities? Possessed when graduated?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Aircraft operability and design maturity integration
Design
Failure assessment and recognition
Stress and structures analysis
Materials and processes
Systems engineering and architecture
Airworthiness and certification
Architecture, integration and in-service support
Systems & electronics engineering
Structural & general engineering
Flight physics
Configuration management
Composites design and stress
Supply management
Lean experts & supply chain quality field engineering
Electrical design/integration
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 103 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
42. Did you gain relevant competences on the job? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
43. Do employees in your company receive incentives to develop their competences through
internal or external courses?
Yes
No
44. Are there additional programs/courses offered in your company to gain competences
needed?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did you take any of these additional programs/courses offered in your company to gain
competences needed? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:104of 165
PART 2d: COOPERATION BETWEEN INDUSTRY AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
45. How did you get to know the company you currently work for? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
46. Was this company your first choice? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Please describe briefly your prior attempts to get a job in the air
transport/aeronautical sector (in different companies and/or positions)
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
47. Is there any cooperation between your company and the educational institute you
graduated from? (e.g. joint research, internships, …) (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Did this cooperation influence your career decision?
Yes
How? _______________________________________________________________________________________
No
No
I do not know
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 105 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
48. To what extent do you agree that (increased) cooperation between industry and
educational institutes would benefit the air transport/aeronautical sector in the following
topics?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Recruitment
Providing basic education in air transport/ aeronautics
Providing specialized education
Industry research/ development
Increasing industry visibility
Innovation and creativity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:106of 165
PART 3: OTHER COMMENTS
49. Please provide below any other comments that you might have. (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
50. Please indicate whether you are interested in receiving the results of this survey
Yes
Contact details/email __________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Thank you for your participation!
If you want more information about the EDUCAIR project, please visit our website at
http://www.educair.eu/.
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 107 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
4.5.3.3 EDUCATION SURVEY - Universities
This survey is conducted by the consortium of the EDUCAIR project, a European 7th Framework
Programme. The objective of project is to improve the match between needs in human resources
in the European air transport and aeronautics sector and the educational and training offer.
More information about the EDUCAIR project can be found on the project website:
http://www.educair.eu/
The target audience of this survey are heads of departments or full professors of universities and
colleges with engineering programs involving air transport/aeronautics and/or research and
PhD programs in air transport/aeronautics. Furthermore, also vocational and professional
training institutions are addressed. The survey aims to collect quantitative and qualitative
information on the demand for graduates in the air transport and aeronautics industry and input
on educational topics and industry-education relationships.
This survey holds three parts. The first part contains general questions to get a view on the
background of the respondent. The second part is divided into several sections: questions about
(graduating) students (A), about the current educational offer of your university (B), about the
competences needed in the sector (C) and about the cooperation between the industry and the
educational institutions (D). In the last part of this survey, you can leave any comments or
remarks you might have. The survey takes 30 minutes to complete.
Information gathered is for internal use only, and will not be shared with any third parties. All
your answers to this survey are private and confidential and will only be used within EDUCAIR.
The information provided will be used for statistical purpose only and no nominal data will be
kept in the database.
Respondents are identified for the single purpose of clarification of answers.
PART 1: BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT
1. Name of organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:108of 165
2. Type of organization/institution (multiple choice; all that apply)
University/college with engineering programs involving air transport/aeronautics
University/college with research and PhD programs in air transport/aeronautics
Vocational training institute
Professional training institute
3. Position in the organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
4. Department (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
5. Country (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART 2a: (GRADUATING) STUDENTS & RESEARCHERS
6. How many students are currently enrolled in your institution? (open response)
Students enrolled in undergraduate degree programs _________________________________________
Students enrolled in graduate degree programs ________________________________________________
7. How many students (on average) graduate annually in your institution?
(open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 109 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
8. How many students are currently enrolled in engineering programs in engineering
programs involving air transport and/or aeronautics in your institution?
(open response; number or percentage)
Students enrolled in undergraduate degree programs _________________________________________
Students enrolled in graduate degree programs________________________________________________
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
9. How many students (on average) graduate yearly in engineering programs involving air
transport and/or aeronautics in your institution? (open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:110of 165
10. How many students are expected to enroll in engineering programs involving air transport
and aeronautics the next 1, 3 and 5 years?
(open response; several answers possible)
1 year - undergraduate ___________________________________________________________________________
1 year - graduate __________________________________________________________________________________
3 years - undergraduate __________________________________________________________________________
3 years - graduate _________________________________________________________________________________
5 years - undergraduate __________________________________________________________________________
5 years - graduate _________________________________________________________________________________
11. How many researchers are currently working in your institution? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
12. How many of those researchers are PhD-students?
(open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. How many of those PhD-students actually achieve a PhD-degree?
(open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. How many researchers, currently working in your institution, are performing research
regarding air transport and/or aeronautics? (open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 111 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
15. How many researchers, currently working in your institution, are PhD-students with a topic
in air transport and/or aeronautics? (open response; number or percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Did this number increase/decrease over the last years? (multiple choice; select one)
Increase; with how much and why? _____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
Decrease; with how much and why? ____________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No (major) change
16. According to your experience, to what extent do you agree that different subject areas are
important for recruiting new employees in the air transport/aeronautics sector?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
ENGINEERING
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Aerospace
Chemical
Civil
Communication
Electrical
Electronics
Industrial
Information Systems & Computer
Materials
Mechanical
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:112of 165
VOCATIONAL PROGRAMMES
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Pilot
Air Traffic Controller
Aircraft Maintenance Mechanic
Aeronautical Station Operator
Flight Operations Officer
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
OTHER DISCIPLINES
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Management/ Business Economics
Law
Economics/ Public Policy
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 113 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
17. To what extent do you agree that the qualifications below are important for recruiting in the
air transport/aeronautics sector and to what extent do you agree that the graduates possess
those criteria (before hiring)?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
EDUCATION & WORKING EXPERIENCE
Important for hiring? Possessed by graduates?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
University degree NA
University degree in air transport/ aeronautics
Previous working experience
Previous working experience related to air transport/ aeronautics
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
SKILLS
Important for hiring? Possessed by graduates?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Problem solving
Analytical background
Technical background
Theoretical background
Oral and written communications
Leadership
Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:114of 165
PART 2b: CURRENT EDUCATIONAL OFFER
18. Please indicate the type of education related to air transport/aeronautics provided by your
institution and please specify. (multiple choice; select all that apply)
Course in Bachelor program
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
A Bachelor program
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Course in Master program
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
A Master program
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
General university course (not part of a Bachelor/Master program)
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
A post-graduate research/PhD program
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Professional course
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 115 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
19. Please indicate the teaching mode related to air transport/aeronautics provided by your
institution and please specify (multiple choice; select all that apply)
General classroom learning
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Distance learning
Distance learning is defined as collective education through internet-based tools.
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
eLearning
eLearning is defined as individual education through internet-based tools.
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Blended learning
Blended learning is defined as distance learning where on-site presence is required.
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
QUESTIONS TO BE REPEATED FOR EACH OF THE BOXES TICKED ABOVE (22-29)
Please fill in the following set of questions for the programs selected in the previous question
(i.e. Bachelor program; Master program; Post-graduate research/PhD program; professional
program)
20. What is the title of the program/degree? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
21. What is the type of the program? (multiple choice; select all that apply)
1st Bologna Cycle (Bachelor)
2nd Bologna Cycle (Master)
3rd Bologna Cycle (PhD)
Vocational program
Professional program
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:116of 165
22. What is the type of degree awarded (multiple choice; select all that apply)
Ba
BEng
MSc
MEng
PhD
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
23. What is the program structure? (multiple choice; select all that apply)
1 year
2 years
3 year
4 years
2+3 years
3+2 years
Full 5-year
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
24. What is the language in which the program is offered? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
25. How many of the students are international? (open response, percentage)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
26. How many faculty/teaching staff is involved in the program? (number)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
27. How many of this staff is involved in air transport/aeronautics educational (teaching or
research) activities? (number)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 117 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
28. Are there specializations offered by the program? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
29. How many ECTS credits are required for the degree? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
30. Do you believe that there are enough programs/courses available?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Indicate 3 important programs/courses that need to be developed
1 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
2 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
3 _________________________________________________________________________________________________
31. Is the knowledge which is generated through research in your educational institution
transferred to the students? (multiple choice; select one and specify)
Yes
In which way? __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
I do not know
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:118of 165
PART 2c: COMPETENCES NEEDED IN THE SECTOR
Please consider the following competences in the air transport/aeronautics domain.
For every competence, please indicate the extent to which you agree that the competences are
taught in your institution.
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
32. AIRLINE – COCKPIT CREW
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Planning of the flight
On board instrument control
General and radio navigation & communication
Understanding air law & operational procedures
Management of technical aspects
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 119 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
33. AIRLINE – TECHNICS & ENGINEERING
1. Strongly
disagree 2.
Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Maintenance and repair of airframe
Maintenance and repair of power plant
Maintenance and repair of on board instruments
Maintenance and repair of navigation and radio communications equipment
Maintenance and repair of auxiliary systems
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
34. AIRLINE – PLANNING, CONTROL & ICT
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Coordination of maintenance
Planning and coordination of operations
Safety management
Flight dispatching
Determination and provision of meteorological circumstances
Ramp planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:120of 165
35. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – DESIGN
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Design of airside infrastructure
Design of building and terminal
Design of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
36. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Building & construction of airside infrastructure
Building & construction of building and terminal
Building & construction of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 121 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
37. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Master planning
Land use planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
38. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – HANDLING
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Handling of passengers
Handling of freight
Handling of air vehicles
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
39. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – EMERGENCY PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Rescue and fire fighting
Obstacles removal
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:122of 165
40. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – MAINTENANCE
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Airside maintenance
Terminal maintenance
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
41. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Noise control
Emission control
Waste maintenance
Wildlife control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 123 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
42. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – SECURITY
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Security concerning passengers
Security concerning cargo
Security concerning employees
Prevention of intrusion/ unauthorized access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
43. ATM – AREA CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Supervision of Area Control Centre operations
En route aircraft control
Planning & coordination en route air traffic
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:124of 165
44. ATC – APPROACH CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Supervision & planning approach operations
Provision of terminal radar approach control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
45. ATC – TOWER CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Supervision of tower operations
On the ground aircraft movements control
Aircraft landing & taking-off control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 125 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
46. ATC – OTHER ATC OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Provision of flight information to VFR traffic
Planning and coordination of network capacity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
47. ATM
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Design, development and evaluation of ATC procedures
Design, development and sustainment of ATC systems, product and tools
Management of safety of ATC operations
Management of air traffic capacity and efficiency
Management of interaction of operational controllers with operational environment
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:126of 165
48. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Failure assessment and recognition
Avionics, electronic and electrical systems & EMC
Customer service
Fluid mechanics and acoustics
Propulsion and powerplant
RAMS, human factors & operability
Software design & IT
Structural design
Test engineering
Services solutions
Quality engineering
Production rigs
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 127 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
49. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – OPERATIONS
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Airline operations appreciation
Components and aircraft architecture
Manufacturing engineering
Maintenance
RAMS, human factors & operability
Governance
Risk management
Composites manufacturing and assembly
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:128of 165
50. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – ENGINEERING
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Aircraft operability and design maturity integration
Design
Failure assessment and recognition
Stress and structures analysis
Materials and processes
Systems engineering and architecture
Airworthiness and certification
Architecture, integration and in-service support
Systems & electronics engineering
Structural & general engineering
Flight physics
Configuration management
Composites design and stress
Supply management
Lean experts & supply chain quality field engineering
Electrical design/integration
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 129 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
PART 2d: COOPERATION BETWEEN INDUSTRY AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
51. Is there any cooperation between your institution and companies in the air
transport/aeronautics sector?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
What kind of cooperation? (multiple choice; select all that apply)
Research projects
Guest lectures
Providing educational material
Internships
Financial sponsorship
Funding educational programs
Funding research
Funding faculty or staff positions
Providing endowments
Other; please specify _____________________________________________________________________
_____________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
I do not know
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:130of 165
52. To what extent do you agree that (increased) cooperation between industry and
educational institutes would benefit the air transport/aeronautical sector in the following
topics?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Recruitment
Providing basic education in air transport/ aeronautics
Providing specialized education
Industry research/ development
Increasing industry visibility
Innovation and creativity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 131 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
PART 3: OTHER COMMENTS
53. Please provide below any other comments that you might have.
(open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
54. Please indicate whether you are interested in receiving the results of this survey
Yes
Contact details/email __________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Thank you for your participation!
If you want more information about the EDUCAIR project, please visit our website at
http://www.educair.eu/.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:132of 165
4.5.3.4 EDUCATION SURVEY - Students
This survey is conducted by the consortium of the EDUCAIR project, a European 7th Framework
Programme. The objective of project is to improve the match between needs in human resources
in the European air transport and aeronautics sector and the educational and training offer.
More information about the EDUCAIR project can be found on the project website:
http://www.educair.eu/
The target audience of this survey are graduating students and PhD-students of universities and
colleges with engineering programs involving air transport/aeronautics and/or research and
PhD programs in air transport/aeronautics. Furthermore, also students of vocational and
professional training institutes are addressed. The survey aims to collect quantitative and
qualitative information on the demand for graduates in the air transport and aeronautics
industry and input on educational topics and industry-education relationships.
This survey holds three parts. The first part contains general questions to get a view on the
background of the respondent. The second part is divided into several sections: questions about
your educational background and career path (A), about the competences needed in the sector
(B) and about the cooperation between the industry and the educational institutes (C). In the
last part of this survey, you can leave any comments or remarks you might have. The survey
takes XX minutes to complete.
Information gathered is for internal use only, and will not be shared with any third parties. All
your answers to this survey are private and confidential and will only be used within EDUCAIR.
The information provided will be used for statistical purpose only and no nominal data will be
kept in the database.
Respondents are identified for the single purpose of clarification of answers.
PART 1: BACKGROUND OF THE RESPONDENT
1. Age (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Nationality (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
3. English as first language? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 133 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
4. Gender (multiple choice; select one)
Male
Female
5. Name of organization/institution (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. Type of organization/institution (multiple choice; all that apply)
University/college with engineering programs involving air transport/aeronautics
University/college with research and PhD programs in air transport/aeronautics
Vocational training institute
Professional training institute
7. Country (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
PART 2a: EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND & CAREER PATH
8. What is your educational background? (multiple choice; select one)
High school
Bachelor degree
Master degree
PhD
Vocational/professional school
9. What is the level of your current air transport/aeronautical education?
(multiple choice; select one)
Course in Bachelor program
A Bachelor program
Course in Master program
A Master program
General university course (not part of a Bachelor/Master program)
A post-graduate research/PhD program
Professional course
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:134of 165
10. What is the teaching mode of your current air transport/aeronautical education?
General classroom learning
Distance learning
Distance learning is defined as collective education through internet-based tools.
eLearning
eLearning is defined as individual education through internet-based tools.
Blended learning
Blended learning is defined as distance learning where on-site presence is required.
11. Will the exposure to air transport/aeronautical education influence your career decision?
(multiple choice; select one)
Major
Minor
None
12. What is your graduation major? (multiple choice; select one)
Aerospace engineering
Chemical engineering
Civil engineering
Communications
Electrical engineering
Electronics engineering
Industrial engineering
Information Systems & Computer engineering
Materials engineering
Mechanical engineering
Pilot license
Air Traffic Controller license
Aircraft Maintenance Mechanic license
Aeronautical Station Operator license
Flight Operations Officer license
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 135 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
13. Please specify and rank what you valuate the most in choosing a general course?
(open response; most valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. Please specify and rank what you valuate the most in choosing an air transport/aeronautics
related course?
(open response; most valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
15. Please specify and rank what you valuate the least in choosing a general course?
(open response; least valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
16. Please specify and rank what you valuate the least in choosing an air transport/aeronautics
related course?
(open response; most valuated factor first)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:136of 165
17. Do you believe you will get a job in the air transport/aeronautics sector?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Which competences will this job entail? _____________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
I don’t know
PART ONLY FOR PhD-STUDENTS (18-31 & 35)
18. Year of doctoral study (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
19. Number of years as a researcher (academic staff), excluding the period of doctoral study
(open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
20. Are you currently working full-time or part-time? (multiple choice; select one)
Full-time
Part-time
21. Do you receive any funding? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 137 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
22. What is the nature of your contract? (multiple choice; select one)
Fixed-term
What is the length of your contract? (multiple choice; select one)
< 6 months
7 – 12 months
13 – 24 months
25 – 36 months
37 – 48 months
46 – 60 months
> 5 years
Open-ended
23. How did you choose this degree? (multiple choice; select one)
In a newspaper or other printed media
On the institution’s website
On a listserv or email distribution
By word of mouth
Other; please specify ___________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
24. Why did you choose this degree; what were the main drivers? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
25. In a semester, how many individual contacts do you have with your supervisor?
(multiple choice; select one)
1
2
3
4
5 – 9
10 or more
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:138of 165
26. Over the past two years (or since taking up your current position if that is more recent),
have you served a probationary period?
Yes
Have you actively participated in activities to monitor your progress towards any
probationary requirements?
Yes
No
No
27. To what extent do you agree that the following competences were important for your
appraisal and to what extent do you agree that you possessed these competences?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
Important for appraisal? Possessed by me
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Research skills and techniques
Ethics and research governance
Personal effectiveness
Communication skills
Teamworking
Career management
Knowledge transfer and outreach activites
Teaching
Leadership management
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 139 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
28. In comparison with research staff who do not have or obtain a PhD-degree, to what extent
do you agree that your doctoral studies permits you…
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Higher salary
Opportunities for promotion
Opportunities to participate in decision-making processes
Visibility on website and staff directories
Better conditions of employment
Access to training and development
Opportunities to attend conferences and external meetings
Opportunities to participate in international projects and consortiums
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:140of 165
29. To what extent do you agree that your institution recognizes your PhD-studies and values
the contributions that you make to
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1.
Strongly disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Achieving the institution’s research strategy?
Research culture within the department?
Grant applications?
Publications?
Knowledge transfer and commercialization activities?
External collaborations?
Public engagement with research?
Managing resources?
Supervising/managing staff?
Teaching and lecturing?
Supervising research students?
Supporting others (e.g. informal mentoring)?
World-class research?
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 141 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
30. To what extent do you agree that …
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1.
Strongly disagree
2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
You are integrated into your department’s research community?
You are integrated into your institution’s research community?
You are integrated into your wider disciplinary research community?
The research culture of the institution stimulates your work?
31. To what extent do you agree that…
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
1. Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
You are encouraged to engage in personal and career development?
You have reflected on your development needs?
You have a clear career development plan?
You maintain a record of your professional development?
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:142of 165
32. Who would you consult, or have you consulted, about your longer-term career planning?
(multiple choice; select all that apply)
Career advisors
Staff developer
Human resources specialist
Principal investigator (PI)/line manager
Your appraiser (if they are not your PI/line manager)
Mentor
Colleagues
Professional body/learned society
Funding organization
Recruitment agency
Online social networks
Partner/family/friends
33. In which area(s) of work do you aspire to be in 5 years time? (multiple choice; select one)
I haven’t thought about it yet
Career in higher education – primarily research and teaching
Career in higher education – primarily research
Career in higher education – primarily teaching
Research career outside higher education (e.g. in a private research organization, charity
of in an industrial environment)
Non-research career
34. What types of non-research careers or research careers outside higher education are you
interested in? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 143 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
35. Which of the following have you done, or would you like to do, as part of your current
position? (multiple choice; select one in each row)
I have done this
I would like to do this
I currently have no interest in this
Acquiring experience outside your immediate area
Collaborate with international colleagues
Collaborate with industry
Undertake a placement in another sector (e.g. business/voluntary/government)
Undertake a secondment to another institution
Work as part of a cross-disciplinary team
Developing management experience or expertise
Manage a budget
Participate in departmental decision making processes and committees
Participate in institutional decision making processes and committees
Plan and manage a project
Developing a broader experience of research functions
Apply for a fellowship
Develop specialist research skills and techniques
Explain work to people outside your field
Knowledge transfer
Supervise a doctoral or master student
Write a grant/funding proposal
Write up research for publication
Improving communication skills
Demonstrating, teaching or lecturing
Presenting work at a conference (orally/poster)
Participating in public engagement activities
Engaging in coaching, mentoring or action learning
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:144of 165
36. Where you employed before? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Why did you start studying again? _____________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
37. To what extent do you agree that the qualifications below are important for getting a job in
the air transport/aeronautics sector?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
EDUCATION & WORKING EXPERIENCE
1. Strongly
disagree 2. Disagree
3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
University degree
University degree in air transport/ aeronautics
Previous working experience
Previous working experience related to air transport/ aeronautics
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 145 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
SKILLS
1.
Strongly disagree
2. Disagree 3. Neither disagree
nor agree 4. Agree
5. Strongly agree
Not applicable
Problem solving
Analytical background
Technical background
Theoretical background
Oral and written communications
Leadership
Ability to work in multidisciplinary teams
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:146of 165
PART 2b: COMPETENCES NEEDED IN THE SECTOR
Please consider the following competences in the air transport/aeronautics domain.
For every competence, please indicate the extent to which you agree that the competences are
important for employment in the air transport/aeronautics sector and indicate the extent to
which you agree that you acquire those through to your education?
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
(multiple choice; select one in each row)
38. AIRLINE – COCKPIT CREW
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Planning of the flight
On board instrument control
General and radio navigation & communication
Understanding air law & operational procedures
Management of technical aspects
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 147 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
39. AIRLINE – TECHNICS & ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Maintenance and repair of airframe
Maintenance and repair of power plant
Maintenance and repair of on board instruments
Maintenance and repair of navigation and radio communications equipment
Maintenance and repair of auxiliary systems
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
40. AIRLINE – PLANNING, CONTROL & ICT
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Coordination of maintenance
Planning and coordination of operations
Safety management
Flight dispatching
Determination and provision of meteorological circumstances
Ramp planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:148of 165
41. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – DESIGN
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design of airside infrastructure
Design of building and terminal
Design of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
42. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Building & construction of airside infrastructure
Building & construction of building and terminal
Building & construction of landside access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
43. AIRPORT INFRASTRUCTURE – PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Master planning
Land use planning
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 149 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
44. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – HANDLING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Handling of passengers
Handling of freight
Handling of air vehicles
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
45. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – EMERGENCY PLANNING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Rescue and fire fighting
Obstacles removal
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
46. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – MAINTENANCE
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airside maintenance
Terminal maintenance
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:150of 165
47. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Noise control
Emission control
Waste maintenance
Wildlife control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
48. AIRPORT OPERATIONS – SECURITY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Security concerning passengers
Security concerning cargo
Security concerning employees
Prevention of intrusion/ unauthorized access
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 151 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
49. ATM – AREA CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of Area Control Centre operations
En route aircraft control
Planning & coordination en route air traffic
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
50. ATC – APPROACH CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision & planning approach operations
Provision of terminal radar approach control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:152of 165
51. ATC – TOWER CONTROL
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Supervision of tower operations
On the ground aircraft movements control
Aircraft landing & taking-off control
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
52. ATC – OTHER ATC OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Provision of flight information to VFR traffic
Planning and coordination of network capacity
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 153 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
53. ATM
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Design, development and evaluation of ATC procedures
Design, development and sustainment of ATC systems, product and tools
Management of safety of ATC operations
Management of air traffic capacity and efficiency
Management of interaction of operational controllers with operational environment
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:154of 165
54. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Failure assessment and recognition
Avionics, electronic and electrical systems & EMC
Customer service
Fluid mechanics and acoustics
Propulsion and powerplant
RAMS, human factors & operability
Software design & IT
Structural design
Test engineering
Services solutions
Quality engineering
Production rigs
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 155 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
55. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – OPERATIONS
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Airline operations appreciation
Components and aircraft architecture
Manufacturing engineering
Maintenance
RAMS, human factors & operability
Governance
Risk management
Composites manufacturing and assembly
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:156of 165
56. MANUFACTURERS/SUPPLIERS – ENGINEERING
1. Strongly disagree; 2. Disagree; 3. Neither disagree nor agree; 4. Agree; 5. Strongly agree.
Important in the sector? Acquired through education?
1 2 3 4 5 NA 1 2 3 4 5 NA
Aircraft operability and design maturity integration
Design
Failure assessment and recognition
Stress and structures analysis
Materials and processes
Systems engineering and architecture
Airworthiness and certification
Architecture, integration and in-service support
Systems & electronics engineering
Structural & general engineering
Flight physics
Configuration management
Composites design and stress
Supply management
Lean experts & supply chain quality field engineering
Electrical design/integration
Other; please specify below
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 157 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
57. Are you planning/intending to take any additional programs/courses to gain extra
competences? (multiple choice; select one)
Yes
Please specify __________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Why not? ________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
58. Who have you consulted or will you consult, about your immediate training and
development needs? (multiple choice; select all that apply)
Career advisor
Staff developer
Human resources specialist
Principal investigator (PI)/line manager
Your appraiser (if they are not your PI/line manager)
Mentor
Colleagues
Professional body/learned society
Funding organization
Recruitment agency
Online social networks
Partner/family/friends
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:158of 165
PART 2c: COOPERATION BETWEEN INDUSTRY AND EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS
59. Do you target/aim for a job in the air transport/aeronautics sector?
(multiple choice; select one)
Yes
No
Why not? Please specify _______________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
60. Which (type of) company would you like to work for? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
61. How did you get to know these companies? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
62. How will you choose the company you want to work for? (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 159 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
PART 3: OTHER COMMENTS
63. Please provide below any other comments that you might have. (open response)
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________________________________
64. Please indicate whether you are interested in receiving the results of this survey
Yes
Contact details/email __________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
No
Thank you for your participation!
If you want more information about the EDUCAIR project, please visit our website at
http://www.educair.eu/.
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:160of 165
4.5.4 Survey – processing the answers
Questions within the different subsections of part two of the survey will be compared to assess
whether there are competence gaps.
Current situation of industry and education
How many employees do the companies hold?
Industry survey – companies: question 8
What is the type of current/recruited employees?
Industry survey – companies: questions 14-16
What is the educational background of these employees?
Industry survey – companies: question 17
How many students are enrolled? How many students will graduate?
How many researchers are enrolled and how many of those are PhD-students?
Education survey – universities: questions 6-9
Education survey – universities: questions 11-15
What is the situation of those PhD-students?
Education survey – students: questions 18-31, 35
Future demand and supply in the air transport/aeronautics market
How will the number of employees/graduates change?
Industry survey – companies: question 9
Education survey – universities: question 10
What are the recruiting criteria?
Industry survey – companies: questions 10-13
Industry survey – employees: question 16
Education survey – universities: questions 16-17
Education survey – students: question 37
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 161 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Educational path
Before employment Industry survey – employees: questions 10-13
Education survey – students: questions 8-12
Education survey – students: questions 18-31, 35
On the job education Industry survey – companies: questions 18-19, 49-50
Industry survey – employees: questions 42-44
Education survey – students: question 57
Career path
Industry survey – employees: questions 14-15
Education survey – students: questions 17,36
Career development? Education survey – students: questions 32-34, 58-60
Competence gaps 1, 2 & 3
Competences needed vs. competences possessed
Industry survey – companies: questions 30-48
Competences relevant vs. competences possessed
Industry survey – employees: questions 23-41
Competences taught Education survey – universities: questions 32-50
Important competences vs. competences acquired
Education survey – students: questions 38-56
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:162of 165
Competence gap 4: companies vs. universities
Educational offer Industry survey – companies: questions 26-27
Industry survey – employees: questions 19-20
Education survey – universities: questions 18-30
Satisfaction about educational offer – quantitative
Industry survey – companies: question 28
Industry survey – employees: question 21
Education survey – universities: question 30
Satisfaction about educational offer – qualitative
Industry survey – companies: question 29
Industry survey – employees: question 22
Knowledge transferal (research to education)
Education survey – universities: question 31
To reduce gaps– cooperation between industry and education?
Existent? Industry survey – companies: question 51
Industry survey – employees: question 47
Education survey – universities: question 51
Advantages of the cooperation
Potential Industry survey – companies: question 52
Industry survey – employees: question 48
Education survey – universities: question 52
Real Industry survey – employees: questions 45-46
Education survey – students: questions 61-62
Attractiveness of the air transport/aeronautics sector
Challenges for recruiting? Industry survey – companies: questions 20-21
Information regarding employees leaving
Industry survey – companies: questions 22-25
What is valued most/least in job in the sector
Industry survey – employees: questions 17-18
What is valued most/least when choosing an educational program/course
Education survey – students: questions 13-16
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 163 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
5 References
Air Transport Action Group (2009), Regional and group analysis Europe, Aviation:
Benefits Beyond Borders,
http://www.aviationbenefitsbeyondborders.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/REGIONAL_A
NALYSIS_ABBB_Europe1.pdf
Airbus (2011), Delivering the future, Global Market Forecast 2011-2030.
Airliner World (2012), In brief, Airliner World, Vol.2012, no.3, p.9.
Ardakani, F.B., Yarmohammadian, M.H., Abari, A.A.F. & Fathi, K. (2011),
“Internationalization of higher education systems”, Procedia Social and Behavioral
Sciences, 15, pp. 1690-1695.
Atici, B. & Atik, I. (2011), “Cost analysis in distance learning: Turkish air forces distance
learning center case”, Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 28, pp. 640-645.
Boeing (2011), Market Outlook 2011-2030.
Bryan, W., Harter, N. (1897), “Studies in the physiology and psychology of the telegraphic
language”, Psychological Review, Vol 4, pp. 27-53.
Bryan, W., Harter, N. (1899), “Studies on the telegraphic language: The acquisition of a
hierarchy of habits”, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Vol 10, pp. 113-129.
Chalermpong, S. & Klaiklueng, A. (2011), Valuing Aviation Noise by Contingent Valuation
Method: Case of Bangkok Suvarnabhumi Airport, Paper presented at TRB 2012 Annual
Meeting, 11p.
Embraer (2011), Market Outlook 2011-2030.
Eurocontrol (2010), Long-Term Forecast, Flight Movements 2010-2030.
Fini, E.H. & Mellat-Parast, M. (2011), Using Project-Based Learning (PBL) to Improve
Student Learning in Transportation Engineering, paper presented at TRB 2012 Annual
Meeting, 27p.
Gagné, R. M. (1962) ‘The acquisition of knowledge”, Psychological Review, Vol 69, pp
355-365
GlobeScan (2010), “Four in Five Regard Internet Access as a Fundamental Right: Global
Poll”, study commissioned by BBC,
news.bbc.co.uk/2/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/08_03_10_BBC_internet_poll.pdf
Doc. Id: EDUCAIR_WP3_D3
Doc. Title: Deliverable 3: Assessment Framework Doc. Version: Final
Contract:284899
Date:11 May 2012 Page:164of 165
Hartle, F. (1995), How to Re-engineer your Performance Management Process, London,
Kogan Page.
Huang, A. & Levinson, D. (2011), To game or not to game: teaching transportation
planning with board games, paper presented at TRB 2012 Annual Meeting, 21 p.
ICAO (2011a), “Attracting & Retaining – Motivating young people to seek out and stay
focused on aviation professions.”, Training Report, Vol. 1, No.2, 52p.
ICAO (2011b), “The Challenges of Continuous Modernization – Addressing looming
skilled personnel shortages and the need for industry-wide technology upgrades.”,
Training Report, Vol. 1, No. 1, 44p.
International Transport Forum (2011), Transport Outlook 2011.
Israel, G.D. (1992) “Determining Sample Size”, University of Florida, Florida Cooperative
Extension Service, Factsheet PEOD-6, 5p.
Jenkinson, L.R., Page, G.J. & Marchman, J.F. (2000), “A model for international teaming in
aircraft design education”, Aircraft Design, 3, pp. 239-247.
Oxford Economics, Avation, The Real World Wide Web, 127 p.
http://www.oxfordeconomics.com/FREE/PDFS/OEAVIATION09.PDF
Parkinson, A. (2007), “Engineering Study Abroad Programs: Formats, Challenges, Best
Practices”, Online Journal for Global Engineering Education, vol. 2 (2001), Iss. 2, Art. 2,
The Berkeley Electronic Press, http://digitalcommons.uri.edu/ojgee/vol2/iss2/2.
Parkinson, A., Harb, J. & Magleby, S. (2009), Developing Global Competence In Engineers:
What Does It Mean? What Is Most Important?, American Society for Engineering
Education, 13 p.
Proctor, W., Dutta, A. (1995), “Skill Acquisition and Human Performance”, Sage
Publication, London.
Swift, E. J. (1904), “The acquisition of skill in typewriting: A contribution to the
psychology of learning”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 1, pp. 295-305.
Swift, E.” (1910), Learning to telegraph”, Psychological Bulletin, Vol 7, pp. 149-153.
Tam, R. (2011), Regional Catalytic Economic Impacts and Noise-Damage Costs of Aviation
Growth, Paper presented at TRB 2012 Annual Meeting, 14p.
Tate, W. (1995), Developing Corporate Competence: A High-Performance Agenda for
Managing Organisations, London, Gower.
Contract: 284899
Authors: Kupfer, Struyf, Sys, Vanelslander, Van de Voorde (UA)
Partner Responsible: UA
Dissemination Level: Public
Page: 165 of 165 Date: 11 May 2012
Torenbeek, E. (2000), “Aircraft design education in Europe”, Editorial in Aircraft Design,
3, pp. 205-206.
Venter, C.J. (2011), Exploring Cooperative Learning through Gaming Simulation in an
integrated Land Use-Transportation Planning Course, paper presented at TRB 2012
Annual Meeting, 16 p.
Weinert, F. (2001) Vergleichende Leistungsmessung in Schulen eine umstrittene
Selbstverständlichkeit. In F. E. Weinert (Ed.) Leistungsmessungen in Schulen, Weinheim
und Basel: Beltz Verlag, pp. 17-31.
Winterton, J., Delamare-Le Deist, F., Stringfellow, E. (2005) Typology of knowledge, skills
and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype, Centre for European
Research on Employment and Human Resources - Groupe ESC Toulouse.
Woodruffe, C. (1991), “Competent by any other name”, Personnel Management,
September 1991, pp. 30-33 .