+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessing Vulnerability of Food System in Rohini-Tinau-Banaganga (RTB) basins in Nepal, Tarai Nepal...

Assessing Vulnerability of Food System in Rohini-Tinau-Banaganga (RTB) basins in Nepal, Tarai Nepal...

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: corey-carr
View: 219 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
27
Assessing Vulnerability of Food System in Rohini-Tinau-Banaganga (RTB) basins in Nepal, Tarai Nepal Water Conservation Foundation 2005, Kathmandu
Transcript

Assessing Vulnerability of Food System in

Rohini-Tinau-Banaganga (RTB) basins in Nepal, Tarai

Nepal Water Conservation Foundation2005, Kathmandu

North-Central IG plains

Physiography

Interdependent Water Systems

Administrative Map

Average Households Annual Income of

Source RohiniIncome (Rs) Per cent

Agriculture 14,065 13.9

Livestock 6,732 6.7

Service 28,007 27.7

Trade/Business 2,694 2.7

Cottage Industry

1,001 1.0Others 48,589 48.0

Total 1,01,080 100

Item RohiniNRs %

Cereal 22,790 40.8Dal 3,161 5.7Vegetables 343 0.6Spices 1,004 1.8Kerosene 783 1.4Gas 234 0.4Electricity 1,059 1.9Communication 902 1.6Transportation 3,141 5.6Medicine 5,167 9.2Education 4,305 7.7Cloth 4,765 8.5Agriculture wage 1,804 3.2Other wages 635 1.1Festivals 3,451 6.2Others 2,340 4.3Total 55,884 100

Annual Expenditure Pattern

(Rs/HH/) Nepal

Close to mountains. Variation in the IG plain

Drained by rivers that originate in the Chure hills

Flood and bank cutting, water shortage in

winter

Sites Selection

Perceived breadbasket but food deficit

Many irrigation systems (large and small, old and new)

Major people’s movement route between Bhairahawa and Gorakhpur

Movement of people for employment, trade and pilgrim

New settlements, mixed population of both Tarai and hill origin

Transition region between the lower IGP and hills

Physical intervention has changed hydrological character of eastern part. Conventional water management approach not effective

Clearing of forest for settlement and East-West introduced transformation

Local industries and new livelihood opportunities.

Since 1995, NWCF involved in local water management and local adaptation study.

Outputs : • Rethinking the mosaic, • Fluid mosaic, and • Livelihood resilience.

• Average family size of the sample households: 7.5 number per family

• Average land holding size: 2.78 ha• Average cereal cropped area: 3.47 ha

per household• Average cropping intensity in the

study area: 1.25% (it is too low for Tarai district)

Characteristics of Agricultural System of Nawalparasi District (an example)

• Annual cereal food production: 7.35 metric ton per household

• Per capita food production: 982 kg (high compared to national average)

• Per capita agricultural income: Rs. 11,443.00

• Sugarcane, banana and seasonal vegetables are major cash crops

• Dairy and goat farming is common and source of cash income for the majority of the farming households.

• Wide variation in the productivity and production of major cereals and cash crops.

• Households along road heads sell milk, make good income.

• Few practice commercial farming

• Annual income of the majority is low

• Rice is major staple food for majority

Food Self Sufficiency Status: Disaggregated data for the district not available. Data

for Western development region is as follows:

54 per cent households produce sufficient food for the families and remaining 46 per cent households produce foods as follows:

22.5 per cent households produced food for >9 to<12 months

12.5 per cent households produced food for >6 to<9 months

8.8 per cent households produced food for >3 to<6 months

2.5 per cent households produced food for <3 months period.

Food insufficiency at household level:

Determining Factors

Reasons % households1. Low productivity 23.32. Small land holding size 60.03. Lack of investment capital 6.74. Cultivation of cash crops 10.0

Means of fulfilling food deficiency

Means % Households

1. Purchasing90.0

2. Borrowing 10.0

From adaptive study: Another perspective

Occupation

Population on agriculture 36%

Labor 16.3%

Services and teaching 9.5%

Household income

• Agriculture about 14%

• Other sources 48%

• Service about 27%

Migration

About 36% have lived for more than 20 years.

About 64% has migrated in the recent past.  

High complexity and undergoing transformation (water regime, production, market, community, employment, migration, and tourism//

Date on food scanty (regional level data exists)

Disjuncture between regional and local levels data and understanding

Seasonal water Scarcity

Pollution

Arsenic is an emerging threat impact on food systems ??

Preliminary Scenario


Recommended