+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

Date post: 07-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: e-agriculture-community-of-practice
View: 547 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
Presented by Stijn van der Krogt, Director Country Programmes, IICD in e-Agriculture Perspectives session at ICTD2010 conference. 16 December 2010.
Popular Tags:
18
www.iicd.org Does it all make sense (also in conservative times)? London 16 December, 2010 Dr. Stijn van der Krogt Director Country Programs [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Does it all make sense (also in conservative times)?

London

16 December, 2010

Dr. Stijn van der Krogt

Director Country Programs

[email protected]

Page 2: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Can ICT end Poverty?

Kentaro Toyama: “Well, no. Technology is only a magnifier of

human intent and capacity.”

Technology widens the gap through three mechanisms:

1. Differential access - technology is consistently more accessible to the rich and the powerful.

2. Differential capacity - with limited capacity, technology’s value is minimal.

3. Differential motivation - what do people want to do with the technology they have access to?

“… disseminating technology is easy; nurturing human capacity and human institutions that put it to good use is the crux.”

Page 3: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

IICD programs 1998-2010

Where?

• 8 countries

• 68 programs

• 40% independent

What?

• Local information

• Internet, radio/tv, mobile

• Competency development

Who?

• 300 info access points

• 600,000 small scale farmers and traders, 40% women

• 4,000,000 beneficiaries – small scale farmers and traders

Page 4: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

IICD programs 2011-2015

Page 5: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Challenges livelihoods

Key challenges livelihoods• Low profitability small farmers• Lacking market access• Low productivity and lacking knowledge production

methods• Need to certification of ecological/equitable products • Problems with land use

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Page 6: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

How do we work? Social Innovation

1. Local Ownership (OW)

2. Competency Development in ICT (CD)

3. Institutional Integration of ICT at organisation

and sector levels (II)

Facilitation of participatory identification & formulation

4. Joint learning, monitoring & evaluation of outputs, outcomes, impact & processes

Support in knowledge sharing, lobby & policy formulation

Advice on change management & alignment

Coaching & training in social, technical & financial knowledge, skills and attitudes

Ad

just

ed

str

ate

gie

s lo

cal

pa

rtn

ers

& C

4C

pa

rtn

ers

Page 7: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Outcome & Impact: Why to measure?

• Focus on Input and Output• Demand verifiable evidence development programs • Political emphasis on aid effectiveness• Lacking data and capacity in

“less-than-ideal conditions” N. Keita, FAO

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Impact Indicators(Ultimate goal)

Outcome Indicators(behavioral change)

Output Indicators(Goods and Services)

Input Indicators (Material, financial, human)

Page 8: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

What to measure?

• Impact compared over time• Impact compared places• Impact compared with other or no interventions

• Project level: Service delivery• National level: Development Objectives, PRS• International level: MDGs

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Page 9: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

How to measure?

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Comparison of key features of different surveys

1 2 3 4 5 Best used for:

  Sample size Duration Visits to household Question-naire size Cost ($m) Time series Sub- nat'l Counter- factual

Population census Full coverage 3-6 months 1 4-8 15-25

Agricultural census 20 000-50 000 1-1.5 years 2-4 5-12 5-10

LSMS/integrated survey 5 000-10 000 1-1.5 years 2 40+ 1-2

Household budget survey 4 000-10 000 1-1.5 years 15-25 15-20 1-2

Community survey 100-500 4-6 months 1 4-6 0.2-0.4

Service delivery survey (CWIQ) 10 000-15 000 2-3 months 1 8 0.2-0.4

Focus group interviews 40-50 2-3 months 1-3 - 0.05-0.1

Windscreen survey 10-20 2-3 weeks 0   0.01

=not suitable =adequate =good

Page 10: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

What do we measure?

• Satisfaction and usage services• Awareness• Empowerment• Economic development

– Production– Productivity– Markets– Prices – Revenues

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Page 11: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

How do we measure?

On-line questionnaires • Representative sample of users • 35,000 questionnaires in 2003-2010• Automatic report generation

Focus group meetings• Project partners & end users• Qualitative feedback • Discussion possible solutions

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Page 12: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

Page 13: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Connectivity solutions, Ghana

Economic impact

Through this project I now know more places where I can sell my produce Label Valid percentage Agree 51.4% Strongly agree 29.9%

Through this project, I now have more customers Label Valid percentage Agree 53.8% Strongly agree 36.8%

Through this project I receive information about prices of my products in the local market Label Valid percentage Agree 39.6% Strongly agree 55.7%

Through this project, I now receive better prices for my products Label Valid percentage Agree 39.6% Strongly agree 53.8%

Through this project my standard of living has improved Label Valid percentage Agree 30.8% Strongly agree 63.6%

Through this project, I now earn more money Label Valid percentage Agree 41.5% Strongly agree 55.7%

Through this project I use more efficient (production) methods Label Valid percentage Agree 41.0% Strongly agree 54.3%

Page 14: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

Connectivity solutions, Ghana

Perceived outcomes Livelihoods 30 projects - 10 countries

2005-2009

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Satisfaction Awareness Empowerment Economic impact

20052006200720082009

Page 15: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

What do we want to measure?

Measure change in production and revenues

SongTaaba Women, Burkina Faso

I ndicators 2008 2009 2010Number of producers in area 535,093 % direct beneficiaries of the program 10% 15% 20%No. Beneficiaries of program 53,509 80,264 107,019 % beneficiaries with impact 30% 40% 50%No. Productores with impact 16,053 32,106 53,509 Average income per producer $920 $920 $920Increase in revenues due to higher productivity 0% 1% 2%Increase in revenues due to increase in sales prices 5% 6% 9%Increase in revenues due to higher sales volume 2% 3% 4%Total increase in revenues in % per year 7% 10% 15%Total increase in revenues per producer per year 64 92 138

Increased revenues of producers in $us 1,033,800 2,953,713 7,384,283

Investment and operational costs in us$ 350,000 350,000 350,000

Net economic benefits 683,800 2,603,713 7,034,283

Page 16: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

50

Production Chiffre d'affaires Revenu aux membres

200720082009

Tonne de beurre de karité

Million f.cfa

Million f.cfa

Emplois aux membres

32 (30 F et 2 H)

42 (38 F et 4 H)

55 (50 F et 5 H)

Example Coprokazan, Burkina Faso

Nombre de membres

259 (4 H)

369 (4 H)

616 (8 H)

Page 17: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

What did we learn?

Connectivity solutions, Ghana

Satisfaction depends on

• Access and price connectivity

• Relevant content

• Capacity development

Increased awareness and empowerment

• Is a precondition for impact

• ICT enables fast score

Economic impact

• Takes time (3-4 years)

• Requires combined ICT

• Case studies indicate higher than expected impact

Page 18: Assessment of impact in agriculture ict4d

www.iicd.org

What did we learn?

Connectivity solutions, Ghana

Measuring requires combined methodologies

• Simple surveys

• Focus group meetings

• End users provide relevant insights

Missing methodology to compare with other interventions

• Control groups?

• With – Without?

• What are relevant other interventions?

• Community focus groups?

• Community surveys?

• Household surveys?


Recommended