Assessment System and Unit Evaluation
BOE 2005
2007-2008
2008-2009
Number of programs receiving data
51 49
Completion rates of all unit surveys
37% 31%
Indicators Used to MonitorAssessment System
Survey Academic YearCompletion
RatesLesson Plan Assessment for
Teacher Candidates2008-2009 33%2009-2010 31%
Curriculum Unit Assessment for Teacher Candidates
2008-2009 20%2009-2010 17%
Instructor's Evaluation of Advanced Graduate Candidate's Application of Research to Practice
2008-2009 46%
2009-2010 25%
Clinical Practice/Student Teaching/Internship/ICE Evaluation by INSTRUCTOR
2008-2009 32%
2009-2010 35%
2008 – 2009 Assessment Activities 1. Continued to modify, improve and expand the assessment system.
2. Worked to assure completion rates were high by monitoring the use of the assessment system.
3. Enhanced the assessment process and communication pathways by including the Department Chairs on the Assessment Committee.
2009 – 2010 Assessment Activities
3. Shifted Major Responsibility of Assessment to Departments
4. Began process of changing the assessment system from a unit-only based system to one combining unit- and program- based instruments. Hybrid work began Summer 2010
5. Replace the Data Management System – QC: TEAMS to PROJECT EXCELLENCE
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
Number of programs receiving data
49 44 x
Number of programs providing input to Unit (PAR)
32 32 x
Number of programs reporting back to the Unit about changes based on data
x x x
Completion rates of all surveys
31% 29% 65%
Indicators Used to MonitorAssessment System
Survey Academic YearCompletion
RatesLesson Plan Assessment for
Teacher Candidates2008-2009 33%2009-2010 31%Fall 2010 77%
Curriculum Unit Assessment for Teacher Candidates
2008-2009 20%2009-2010 17%Fall 2010 49%
Instructor's Evaluation of Advanced Graduate Candidate's Application of Research to Practice
2008-2009 46%
2009-2010 25%
Fall 2010 100%Clinical Practice/Student
Teaching/Internship/ICE Evaluation by INSTRUCTOR
2008-2009 32%
2009-2010 35%
Fall 2010 55%
May|
Sept|
July|
Nov|
Reviewed Commercial and Other In-House Systems
March|
Project ExcellenceCommences
SharePoint for Documents
ManagementIncorporated
Requirements Identified
Project Excellence
Jan|
March|
May|
Selection of “Chalk and Wire” Data Management Analytical System
2010 2011
Phase I
Unit AssessmentDesign Team
Formed
Committee Members: J. Barnes, OCT, B. Breg, SA, A. Dellaratta, OCT V. Dell’Era, SA, J. Eddy, SEYS, C. Falcon, OCT D. Ferrara (new), ECP, S. A. Kim (new), ECP T. Ko, OCT, M. McAuliffe, IR, B. Murfin, SEYS M Toner, FNES, and new members from EECE
Look for an announcement shortly for a Webinar by Chalk & Wire to demonstrate the features of their system before the end of this semester
Unit Assessment SubcommitteeData Management Design Team
note: Equity 6 - Relate information/instruction/services to students’ out-of-school experiences
2008 – 2009
1 Strongly Disagree4 Strongly Agree
2008 – 2009
1 Strongly Disagree; 4 Strongly Agree
2008 – 2009
1 Strongly Disagree 4 Strongly Agree
Least
Most
Least
Most
Co – Chairs: A Bhattacharya, SEYS, M Toner, FNES
Committee Members: D. Akiba, EECE, E. Armour-Thomas, Chair, SEYS R. Asher, SEYS, M. Baghban, EECE, J. Barnes, OCT H. Bembenutty (former member), SEYS B. Breg, SA, M. Bushnell Greiner, Chair, EECE V. Dell’Era, SA, J. Eddy, SEYS, L. Howell, ECP S. A. Kim, ECP, A. Lipnevich, EECE, M. McAuliffe, IR C. Michaels, Chair, ECP, S. Shin, EECE J. Stengel-Mohr, LCD, N. Wamba, ECP
Unit Assessment Committee
Project Excellence• A System that captures, records, and organizes meaningful data to provide useful information to stakeholders
• A System that permits engagement among all stakeholders through a collaborative, data capturing network with user groups
• A System that displays to stakeholders and interested external agencies the quality of the candidates and graduates of teacher education and clinical programs of the Education Unit