22
41I02SE2001 2.20522 BIGWOOD 010 rries Inc. Bi^fV OocTTowikiiip Property Assessment Work Report Stripping and Trenching Sudbury Mining Division By: Mark Hall BSc. Geology August 2000
41I02SE2001 2.20522 BIGWOOD 010
rries Inc.Bi^fV OocTTowikiiip Property
Assessment Work Report Stripping and Trenching Sudbury Mining Division
By: Mark HallBSc. Geology August 2000
41I02SS2001 2.20522 BIGWOOD 0 10C
INDEX
. Introduction
. Purpose
. Property Description
. Location and Access
. Previous work
. Regional Geology
. Local Geology
. Observations
. Results
. Recommendations
. Figures
IntroductionAllstone Quarry Products Inc. believes there is a market for natural stone products in Ontario's landscaping industry. This phase of exploration is intended to evaluate the extent and nature of near surface material within the claim.
PurposeThe stripping was carried out in order to identify the nature and extent of the bedrock. Specifically to identify material that could be used in decorative landscaping. Three qualities are of prime concern. Those are the natural fracture (ie. block size), the color/texture and resistance to weathering. To be marketable and economic, the rock would have to fracture naturally into usable block sizes, without blasting. A natural face is desirable for landscaping. Size can range widely for specific projects but the bulk of the material must be from a minimum of l meter by l meter by 8 centimeters thick, to 2 metes by 2 meters by 0.5 meters thick. Minor variation in color is acceptable, sometimes even desirable but discoloration due to rust or other staining is not. The rock must also be competent under severe weather conditions. The material is targeted for outdoor use, sometimes under water, so behavior when subject to frost can be critical. To summarize, the purpose is to determine if this location host economic quantities of bedrock suitable for ornamental landscaping purposes.
Property DescriptionThe property consists of a single block (16 unit) claim located in lots 7 and 8, Concession III of Bigwood Township. The claims is registered (lOO^o) to Allstone Quarry Products Limited.
Location and AccessThe claim is located in Lots 7 and 8 of Concession III of Bigwood Township. It is on the west side of Hwy. #69 approximately 75 kilometers south of Sudbury and North of the French River. See figure #1 - location map.
Previous workThe claim was stripped and trenched in selected areas as reported by Allstone in 1995.
Regional Geology.The area is located within the Greenville Geologic Province. The bedrock is typically genissic being composed of metamorphosed sediments and quartz monzonites to syenites, subsequently injected by diabase dykes.
Local GeologyBedrock consists of gneissic granites composed principally of feldspars, quartz, with minor micas (mainly biotite) and almandine garnet. The area has a dominate foliation at approximately 330 degrees, as indicated by local shearing and topography. Topography is rolling with minor relief. Generally the bedrock is a quartz rich gneissic granite, light in color and foliated at 3300 . There may be parting parallel to the foliation but typiocally the bedrock is massive and laminated. The color, mineral content, pattern and fracturing change from outcrop to outcrop, but have a generally light white to pink to gray
appearance. Within the township, there are occurrences of corundum, allanite and graphite.
ObservationsThe bulk of the area stripped shows a massive laminated light colored genissic granite.
In order to be marketable, the material must have at least two natural faces. Therefore only selective areas of the claim, where rock can be extracted as large specimens without blasting, are suitable for landscape materials. The most favorable location is in a zone trending at about 330 degrees, 100 meters to 400 meters wide, parallel to and situate between Hwy. #69 and the quarry road. A less prominent zone runs along side the quarry road at the south end. Favorable jointing is focused to roughly the center of the area stripped as indicated on the attached sketch. To the south end the surface dips below thicker overburden which has yet to be excavated. To the west the topography dips into a low swampy ground. To the north the bedrock generally becomes more massive and locally contains pyrite.
This central zone exhibits jointing from 10 to 100 cm. of varying lengths and widths. Jointing dips approximately 85 degrees to the south east. The jointing strikes at 330 degrees. In some rare locations a horizontal jointing is also present. Composition varies from feldspar- quartz, biotite gneiss to a quartz rich granite gneiss. The color ranges from a white to pink to gray, with black, pink and red highlights. Pyrite can be present. Location and extent of rust staining due to pyrite is unpredictable. Minor amounts (even less than Wo pyrite) can make the material useless. Further, rust contaminated overburden can color the bedrock along the surface or joints, making it unattractive.
Rust staining is most obvious at the northern portion of the stripped area, approximately 200 meters west of the quarry entrance. This location exhibits favorable jointing but the rust staining makes unmarketable. Rust staining can occur in small patches throughout the area with a slight preference towards the western edge of the striped area. There is also a tendency for it to be associated with higher concentrations of biotite. Where pyrite exceeds Wo the rock sometimes becomes friable and in extreme cases crumbles to the touch. Even less than Wo pyrite causes sufficient staking to make it unsuitable for production purposes.
Horizontal jointing is favorable to the creation of blocks of desirable size. This jointing however, is not predictable and not detectable from surface. Rarely, a third jointing, perpendicular to the regional foliation is present. This latter structural feature is limited in extent over less than one meter and parting is on a scale of l to 10 centimeters.
There were no assays taken.
ResultsThe striping revealed that suitable material is limited. The few sites identified as favorable are limited in extent and widely separated. These pits indicated on the attached
sketch. Even those areas with favorable jointing have substantial waste, mainly due to block size and discoloration.
The color of the material varies from white to pink to gray. It is a predominately gneissic, massive laminated granite. Though the basic color is acceptable, certain locations exhibit unacceptable rust staining.
The areas of massive laminated granite would require blasting to extract and reduce to an acceptable size. This would make it unsuitable as landscaping material. Even though it is laminated, it does not split or cut well. Despite the massive nature of the bedrock, it is not so massive as to make it suitable for building stone production. Repeated attempts to cut large blocks into slabs, resulted rejection by the cutting plant. Typically the material is very competent, resistant to weather and even to mechanical splitting. Only a narrow zone near the center of the stripping shows suitable jointing. Even in this zone, suitable sites are limited in extent as rust may be present and block size varies widely.
Over all the stripping reveals only limited potential for quality, economic landscaping material.
RecommendationsThe most favorable zone is located at the eastern side of the claim between Hwy. #69 and the quarry road. It may extend beyond the stripped area to the south east on the far side of the small draw. This area could be stripped next to see how far the zone extends. Consideration should also be given to northern extensions. This would require staking of additional claims.
The prominent ridges are typically made up of massive gneiss, the more sheared material weathers recessively. The thicker overburden will take more effort to strip but these more recessive areas may contain better material. A test pit to the west of the current areas could be stripped to determine if the jointing is present in suitable dimensions.
The presence of horizontal jointing below surface remains a question. There are no apparent controls that may be used to predict its presence. This knowledge is desirable as it may provide suitable product. Diamond drilling could be used to locate areas of sub- cropping horizontal jointing, however, the expense of doing so would be prohibitive. Drilling should only be considered if the value of the material warrants.
sketch itch
EO
UC
AT
IQN
VE
RSI
ON
- N
OT
FOR
CO
MM
ER
CIA
L-U
S^
M \2!ic topper di*,3?M*^it,'j
^livelytm ** f
^^^^7
fcj
P*
I*-S
^'Ifahnaprtae Markstay*
-^ X . l/T:.!
H
a M --- rv
Hagar
^
Yy
ffiumf lit^Estlin
b/ercc *
,'^.-^4 l
- 8*rtow L \^ ^~^"-k-
l ^ ^^-^ ̂
j*'*-
^
lA^vi/e L
?\^pr "-^^.^^
Cdto/r/ife^m11
•s
\ ,\ ,Mon
r \tito* L lOuelieltt
l/ ^Vm Spoon i. fenazinM j s^^
i\
A w.,, -.V ̂ ^tW f A i
Bl 9woorf\3tel^
1641
liver
^ **w won \
Bw E ighteen Mil*fgf\'*rnr L
Pic*
*? ^
Ri
"TisSUNDY"
L -^ J L.AKC
Keyhivsf
!̂\^ VO.**
41I02SE2001 2 .20522 BIGWOOD 020
Allstone Quarries Inc.Bigwood Township Property
Assessment Work ReportStripping and TrenchingSudbury Mining Division
By: Mark Hall BSc. Geology August 2000
41I02SE2001 2 .20522 BIGWOOD 0 2 OC
. Introductions~fa
. Property Description ^ VX \A j^}4^ v, a O *~* * . t;..-i X^
. Location and Access f j *
. Previous work
. Regional Geology
. Local Geology
. Observations
. Recommendations
. Figures
Introduction ^~- Allstone Quarry Products Inc. believes there is a market for natural stone products in Ontario's landscaping industry. This phase of exploration is intended to evaluate the extent and nature of at or near surface material within the .
The purpose of stripping this location is to determine the nature of the bedrock and its usability in landscaping products. This required determining the nature of the color, pattern, and block size. In other words, does it have potential for ornamental stone products in landscaping?
Property DescriptionThe property consists of a single block (16 unit) claim located in lots 7 and 8, Concession III of Bigwood Township. The claims is registered (l00*^6) to AHstone Quarry Products Limited.
Location and AccessThe claim is located in Lots 7 and 8 of Concession III of Bigwood Township. It is on the west side of Hwy. #69 approximately 75 kilometers south of Sudbury and North of the French River. See figure #1 - location map.
Previous workThe claim was stripped in trenched in limited in selected areas as reported by AHstone in 1995. Those areas are indicated as red circles on the attached sketch.
Regional Geology.The area is located within the Greenville Geologic Province. The bedrock is typically genissic being composed of metamorphosed sediments and quartz monzonites to syenites, subsequently injected by diabase dykes.
Local GeologyBedrock in the claim consists of gneissic granites composed principally of feldspars, quartz, biotite micas and almandine garnets. The area has a dominate jointing at approximately 330 degrees, as indicated by local shearing and topography. Topography is rolling with minor relief. The bedrock is well foliated,. Generally the bedrock is a quartz rich gneissic granite, light in color and foliated in the direction of the shearing. The color, mineral content, pattern and fracturing change from outcrop to outcrop, but have a generally light white to pink to gray appearance. Within the township, there are occurrences of corundum, allanite and graphite.
ObservationsIn order to be marketable, the material must normally have a natural surface, not drilled and blasted. Therefore only selective areas of the claim, where rock can be extracted as large specimens without blasting, are suitable for landscape materials. The most favorable location is in a zone trending at about 330 degrees, 100 meters by 400 meters parallel to and situate between Hwy. #69 and the quarry road. Roughly the center of the area stripped as indicated on the attached sketch. (See area A" in figure 2.) To the south end the surface dips below thicker overburden which has yet to be excavated. To the west the topography dips into a low swampy ground. To the north the bedrock generally becomes more massive and locally contains pyrite There is a central area which exhibits jointing from 10 to 100 cm. of varying lengths and widths. Jointing dips approximately 85 degrees to the south east. In some locations a horizontal jointing is also present. The jointing is oriented at 330 degrees and horizontally. Composition varies from a feldspar biotite gneiss to a quartz rich granite gneiss. The color ranges from a white to pink to gray, with black, pink and red highlights. Pyrite can be present in this zone but location and
extent seem to be unpredictable. Minor amounts (even less than Wo pyrite) can make the material useless. Further, rust contaminated overburden can color the bedrock making it unattractive for the above stated purposes.
In other locations the bedrock is massive or rusty as indicated on the attached sketch. The rusty appearance is due to minor pyrite. Rust is most obvious at the northern portion of the stripping about (location "C") 200 meters west of the quarry entrance. Though this location exhibits a favorable jointing but me rust staining makes it waste. There is a tendency for the rest to be located at the western boundary of the sheared zone, but it can occur in small patches throughout the area. There is also a tendency for it to be associated with higher concentrations of biotite. When the pyrite exceeds Wo the rock becomes friable and in extreme cases crumbles to the touch. Even less than Wo pyrite makes it unsuitable for production purposes.
Bedrock generally becomes more massive towards the north and west of the quarry road. It may be the horizontal jointing is repeated at depth, but this has yet to be determined. It becomes more and more difficult to extract any material past a depth of 2 to 3 feet without blasting which could ruin the material.
With the exception of the rust staining, the color and patterns, though variable, are satisfactory for landscaping purposes.
RecommendationsThe most favorable zone is located at the eastern side of the claim between Hwy. #69 and the quarry road. It may extend beyond the stripped area to the south east on the far side of the small draw. This area could be stripped next to see how far the zone extends. Consideration should also be given to northern extensions of this zone on the far side of the massive material.
The prominent ridges are typically made up of massive gneiss, and the more sheared material weathers recessively. The thicker overburden will take more effort to strip but these more recessive areas may contain better material.. A test pit to the west of the current areas could be stripped to determine if the jointing is present in suitable dimensions.
The presence of horizontal jointing below surface remains a question. There are no apparent controls that may be used to predict its location or even if it might be repeated. This knowledge is desirable as it may provide suitable product. Diamond drilling could be used to locate areas of sub-cropping horizontal jointing. However, the expense of doing so would be prohibitive. Drilling should only be considered if the value of the quarry stone warrants.
Figures1. Location sketch2. Striping sketch
Appendix "Aw
Equipment and hours.
Equipment with operator (including the cost of fuel, chainsaws, travel to and from the quarry, food and accommodations.)
H-235 Excavator 480 hours @ SlOO.OO/hour = S48,000.00Front end loader 480 hours @ SdS.OO/hour = S31,200.00Pressure washer, compressor 240 hours @ S45.007hour ^ 310,800.00Manual labor 240 hours @S35.007hour =$ 8,400.00Supervision 80 hours @ 50.00/hour = S 4,000.00
Total = S102,400.00
Dates worked:
May 10 - 15 May 17-22 May 24-29 May 31 -June 5 June 7-12 June 14 - 19 June 21-26 June 28 - July 3
Supervisor J. Melo Excavator N. Melo Front end loader operator J. Court Pressure washer - manual labor M. Cowell
andw.esDeclaration of Assessment Work Performed on Mining Land
Mining Act, Subsection 65(2) and 66(3), R.S.0. 1990
Transaction Number (office use)
. M158Assessment Files Research Imaging
sections 65(2) and 66(3) of the Mining Act. Under section 8 of toe Mining Act, this essment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this m Development and Mines, 3rd Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario,
41I02SE2001 2
Instructions: -
.20522 BIGWOOD 900For work performed on Crown Lands before recording a claim, use form 0240. Please type or print in ink. F *
2. S 001. Recorded holders) (Attach a list if necessary)Name Allstone Quarry Product Inc.Address RR*1 Schomberg Ontario LOG 1TO
Name
Address
Client Number 223779Telephone Number (905) 939-2797
Fax Number
CBent Number
Telephone Number
Fax Number
2. Type of work performed: Check (S) and report on only ONE of the following groups for this declaration.
Geotechnical: prospecting, surveys, assays and work under section 18 (regs)
Physical: drilling stripping, trenching and associated assays
n *-'
Rehabilitation
Work Type Stripping trenching
Dates Work From
Performed
l
10 May 1999 To 3 July 1989
Day ] Month | Y*w Day | Month j Yaar
Global Positioning System Data (if available) Township/Area bIGWOOO
M or G-Pten Number G-4012
Office UseCommodity
Total S Value of Work Claimed /aa A r\f\ ^uNTS Reference
Mining Division
Resident Geologist District c.
S^Jbt.* ^6/
Sad Gat? c/Please remember to: - obtain a work permit from the Ministry of Natural Resources as required;
- provide proper notice to surface rights holders before starting work;- complete and attach a Statement of Costs, form 0212;- provide a map showing contiguous mining lands that are linked for assigning work;- include two copies of your technical report.
3. Pereon or companies who prepared the technical report (Attach a list if necessary)Afetone Quarry Products Inc.
Address: RRf 1 Schomberg Ontario LOG 1TO________ .M^MMMMi^MVl
Name Mark HallAddress 129 Fielding Road Lively, Ontario P3Y 1L7
Name
Address
RECEIVbUSEP 0 1 'fiM
GEOSC1ENCEA88ESSMENT
Telephone Number (90S) 939-8491Fax Number
Telephone Number (705) 682-9297Fax Number
Telephone Number
Fax Number
4. Certification by Recorded Holder or AgentMark Halll, _____ _
(PrtrtName)
this Declaration of Assessment Work havii completion and, to the best of my knowl
., do hereby certify that l have personal knowledge of the facts set forth in
the work to be performed or witnessed the same during or after its nexed report is true.
Signature of Recorded Holder or Agent. A /V\ S/M W^Agent's Address II 129 Fielding Road, Lively, Ontario
Telephone Number (706) 682- 9297
Date September f, 1999
VFax Number
0241(03/97)
Work to be recorded and distributed. Work can only be assigned to claims that are contiguous (adjoining) to the mining (and where the work was performed, at the time the work was preformedM map showing the contiguous link must accompany this form._______f-J . (-\- ^ O' (̂
Mining Claim Number. Or if work was done on othereligible mining land, show in this column the location number indicated on the claim map.e fle-8-e.g.
TB782712345671234668
Number of Claim Units For other mining bind, Nstthe hectares.16 ha
122
Value of work performed on this claim
S26,8250
S8,892
Value of work applied to this dahl.N/AS 24,000.00S 4,000.00
Value of work assigned to other mining claims.
S 24,000.0000
Bank. Value of work to be distributed at a future date.
S2,8250
S4,892
1 1179616
Column Totals
16 S1 02,400.00
S 102,400
S 32,000
S 32,000
S
S
370,400.00
S 70,400
l, ____Mark Hall_______, do hereby certify that the above work credits are eligible under subsection 7(1) of the Assessment WfflgRpgu\ation 6/69 for assignment to contiguous claims or for application to the claim where theSignature of Recorded Holder or Agent Date
6. Instructions for cutting back credits that are not approved1. Credits are to be cut back from the bank first, followed by option number 2 if necessary.
For Office use only
Received
RECEIVEDSEP 0 1 2000
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT am- . OFRCE
Deemed Approved Date
Date Approved
Date Notification Sent
Total Value of Credit Approved
Approved for Recording by Mining Recorder (Signature)
Ontarin lfinisfav of Northern statement of Costs for Assessment WMiailU Development and Credjt
Transaction Number (office use)
l-jo a6 A
Personal information collected on this form is obtained under the authority of 6(1) of the Assessment Work Regulation 6/96. Under section 8 of the Mining Act, the information is a public record. This information wiK be used to review the assessment work and correspond with the mining land holder. Questions about this colection should be directed to the Chief Mining Recorder, Ministry of Northern Development and Mines, 6th Floor, 933 Ramsey Lake Road, Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5.
Work Type
StrippingSupervision
Units of WorkDepending on the type of work, 1st the number of hours/days worked, meters of drflSng, kilometers
of grid fine, number of samples etc.
Associated Costs (e.g. supplies, mobilization and demobilization)See report for details on equipment and hours
Transportation Costs
Food and Lodging Costs
Cost Per Unit
Total VaJue of Assessment Work
Total Cost
S 98,400.00S 4,000.00
S 102,400.00
Calculation of filing Discounts:
1. Work Tried within two years of performance is claimed at 100S of the above Total value of Assessment Work.2. f work is filed after two years and up to five years after performance, it can only be claimed at 50* of the total Value of Assessment Work, f this situation applies to your claims, use the calculation below:————————————-——
TOTAL VALUE OF ASSESSMENT WORK 13092x0.5 Total value of assessment work claimedS51,200.00Note:- Work older than 5 years is not eligible for creditIA recorded holder may be required to verify expenditures claimed in this statement of costswithin 45 days of a request for verification and/or corrections/clarification is not made, theMinister may reject all or part of the assessment work submitted.——^——————————-
Certification verifying costs:
l, _Mark Hall__, do hereby certify, that the amounts shown are as accurate as may reasonably be determined and the costs were incurred while conducting assessment work on the lands indicated on the accompanying Declaration of Work form as __Agent^___ l am authorized to make this certification.
RECEIVEDSEP O 1 2000
GEOSCIENCE ASSESSMENT ___ OFFICE
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministere du DeVeloppement du Nord et des Mines
January 3, 2001
ALLSTONE QUARRY PRODUCTS INC.R.R.#1SCHOMBERG, ONTARIOLOG-1 TO
OntarioGeoscience Assessment Office 933 Ramsey Lake Road 6th Floor Sudbury, Ontario P3E 6B5
Telephone: (888) 415-9845 Fax: (877)670-1555
Dear Sir or Madam:
Subject: Transaction Number(s):
Submission Number: 2 .20522
StatusW0070.00158 Approval After Notice
We have reviewed your Assessment Work submission with the above noted Transaction Number(s). The attached summary page(s) indicate the results of the review. WE RECOMMEND YOU READ THIS SUMMARY FOR THE DETAILS PERTAINING TO YOUR ASSESSMENT WORK.
If the status for a transaction is a 45 Day Notice, the summary will outline the reasons for the notice, and any steps you can take to remedy deficiencies. The 90-day deemed approval provision, subsection 6(7) of the Assessment Work Regulation, will no longer be in effect for assessment work which has received a 45 Day Notice. Allowable changes to your credit distribution can be made by contacting the Geoscience Assessment Office within this 45 Day period, otherwise assessment credit will be cut back and distributed as outlined in Section #6 of the Declaration of Assessment work form.
Please note any revisions must be submitted in DUPLICATE to the Geoscience Assessment Office, by the response date on the summary.
If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please contact JIM MCAULEY by e-mail at [email protected] or by telephone at (705) 670-5858.
Yours sincerely,
ORIGINAL SIGNED BYLucille JeromeActing Supervisor, Geoscience Assessment OfficeMining Lands Section
Correspondence ID: 15562
Copy for: Assessment Library
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number: 2 .20522
Date Correspondence Sent: January 03, 2001 Assessor:JIM MCAULEY
Transaction First ClaimNumber Number Township(s) l Area(s) Status Approval Date
W0070.00158 1179616 BIGWOOD Approval After Notice December 29,2000
Section:10 Physical PSTRIP 10 Physical PTRNCH
The 45 days outlined in the Notice dated November 14, 2000 have passed and the new information that has been provided has been reviewed.
Although the items in the 45 day notice have been addressed, several items remain poorly clarified in the breakdown of exploration expenditures including time and field work. The costs, S48,000 for 480 hours of excavator work and S31,200 for 480 hours of front-end loader work, are "all-inclusive charges" and suggest that these pieces of equipment were used continuously for 60 days (8 hours a day, every day) with only 6 days off and no down time. The use of the front-end loader for a stripping program remains unclear. The "equipment with operator" costs include items listed such as chainsaws (purchase of non-consumable items?) and travel time to and from the quarry (hourly wages for travel are not eligible expenditures). In addition, a portion of the stripping was completed outside the claim but within the aggregate permit; this work is not eligible for assessment credits (approximately 50Xo of the work).
The map does not provide much detail given that over 8100,000 of stripping has been completed. As this work was completed on an aggregate permit, it is important to clearly differentiate exploration work from quarry operations (block removal, etc.).
Assessment work credit has been approved as outlined on the attached Distribution of Assessment Work Credit sheet.
The assessment credit is being reduced by 3007o. The TOTAL VALUE of assessment credit that will be allowed, based on the information provided in this submission, is S71,680.
At the discretion of the Ministry, the assessment work performed on the mining lands noted in this work report may be subject to inspection and/or investigation at any time.
Page: 1
Correspondence ID: 15562
Work Report Assessment Results
Submission Number:
Correspondence to:Resident Geologist Sudbury, ON
Assessment Files Library Sudbury, ON
2.20522
Recorded Holder(s) and/or Agent(s):Mark HallLIVELY, ONTARIO, CANADA
ALLSTONE QUARRY PRODUCTS INC. SCHOMBERG, ONTARIO
Page: 1
Correspondence ID: 15562
Distribution of Assessment Work Credit
The following credit distribution reflects the value of assessment work performed on the mining land(s).
Date: J anuary 03, 2001
Submission Number: 2 .20522
Transaction Number: W0070.00158
Claim Number Value Of Work Performed
1179616 71,680.00
Total: S 7 1,680.00
Page: J
Correspondence ID: 15562
322000 "E
•0-5*'17
COX^ ---- :
7
l rU'
_________4O 50_______________t SP _____TO____________________90 L_____"\ ^——————*-- " '. \"-- •iF "'~.'V7jr ' ~—^~—————^*^r7—' ''Y ' " ̂ ~—^———^T^——'^—^———^—^~—Jl'\" ——-*"
M- - r y^ ^..^'^.^:-T\^J^^^^^^.^"Tl ̂ ^;ri i t K^ ^"";fo\:N':;.; "l\-J^S" " r-' r ;NV ' -. 7 .\! r- i - v\\'- i\\ : -: 4'- f 'v- -.
1 U- -xM ! i : ..^\. 4-,!--- -T\-4'\Vi A;-J. '
90 ••J L0^
H . T: b.W N S Ht P' '
palfef t*-^r -jjFT .*L:- •,'ri4l-"
/'' fiT j --O ^ -'
\ ' C~^L \^\
r^ "^Av. ^ - j -~s; -!-i
^,-J /-Vtf.^ \ \•--^\* k \^ ^^ *hfc \v\\ ^
\ J T
^^^[-^:^SN\ l \, ^ii?^* j \^ N-- -- Tx ' \ -
v ^v\ V^ r^C\ i- ' ^ U/ IR"
13^23^430
ZONE 17
Ministry of Ministry ofNatural Northern DevelopmentResources and Mines
DAIt
Ontariol*
INDEX TO LAND DISPOSITION
FUM
G-4012
BIGWOOD
SUDBURYMMH60M9KW
SUDBURYLMDimn/REBW
SUDBURY
1*1
SYMBOLSBoundary
Township, Meridian, Baseline
Road allowance; surveyedshoreline......
LoVConcessJon; surveyed... . unsutveyed
Parcel; surveyed .. ..........unsurveyed ,...,.,,......
Riaht-of-way; roadrailway.............utility..............
HcservatJCHi
CHW. Pit,Pite......................
Contour .......Interpolated ApproximateDepression - -.. - -... - ...,...
Control point {horizontal)
Flooded land
Mine head frame
Pipeline (above ground)...........Railway; single track
double track.............abandoned
Road; highway, county, township access trail, hush
Shoreline {original) .. .........
Transmission lineWooded ana ....................
AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSTION
M.R.O. - MINING RIGHTS ONLY S.H.O. - SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY M.i-S. MINING AND SURFACE RIGHTS
Description cirderNo. Dme UispoiKiori File
C*l) M-N.R RAI*i35Ha fc' l :: -l rtH JVtJ^-OT
(5J) WASTE DK-OSW. SITE 1.'S.'01 3.RO.'B^t\1i.h Vi'AS'E DISPOSA- alTE S:3;.'"2 tilt w
•l"^ SEC. 42 Unrig As: i,VSB71
DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDSPatent
Surface t, M ining Rights Surface Rights Only. Mining Rights Only.....,
LeneSurface t. M ining Rights-.Surface Rights Only.Mining RtgtiUOnly. --
Licence of Occupation- • •••-
OKter-in-Coundl -. .. .
Canceled Reservation . .....,..,.,,..,
e o
m aoc®(R) (e)
THE INFORMATION THAT APPEARS OM THIS MAP HAS BEEN COMPILED FROM VARIOUS SOURCES. AND ACCURACY IS NOT GUARANTEED. THOSE WISHING TO STAKE MINING CLAIMS SHOULD CONSULT WITH THE MINING RECORDER MINISTRY OF NORTHERN DEVELOPMENT AND MINES. FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON THE STATUS OF THE LANDS SHOWN HERE ON
Map base and land disposition drafting by Surveys and Mapping Branch, Mmi*try o) Natural Rtaourcfts.
n4, location gf li* fabric and parcal boundaries un this index was compiled ter administrative purposes only.
CT l
O no
ro o^o o oH
Ol
g ro
41I02SE20CU 2.20522 BIGWOOD 200
41I0
2S
E2001
2.2
0522
[peters toPost #1
RECEIVED ALLSTDNE QUARRIES
DEC 19 ::cf AsnfHCE
HWYtt69 QuarryStriped Areas Plan
August. gQDQ
Legend
41I02SE2001 2 .20522 BIGWOOD
