42A89SWe057 2.63-42 BEATTY 010

W

ASSESSMENT REPORT

on

TILL SAMPLING AND ASSAYING

CLAIMS L613378 tt - 79

BEATTY TOWNSHIP LARDER LAKE MINING DIV.

RECEIVED

July 1985

- ? 1985

MINING LANDS SECTION G. E, Parsons

INTRODUCTION

This report covers the collecting, processing, and assay results on till samples taken from backhoe pitting and trenching.

The programme was carried out at intervals by the writer between October 26, 1983 and June 4, 1985. It was performed wholly in claims L613378 and -79 in the Nj Lot 12, Con. I, Beatty Twp.

SAMPLING

In October 1983, five pits were dug with a backhoe on magnetic highs in search of bedrock. One pit, 83-B1, encountered till under8 ft. of varved clay, and a sample was taken at a depth of 17 ft.

In October, 1984, 15 pits were dug in search of other locales where it was suspected till might be in reach of the backhoe. Till was located in seven pits spread through a north-south distance of 600 ft. and east-west distance of 300 ft. Bedrock was located at a depth of9 ft. in one pit (No. 5) indicating the till being sampled is probably near bedrock in all the other pits.

The location of the pits and a description are given in Appendix 1; Appendix 2 is a sketch showing the location of the pits and samples.

All samples were taken at the lowest part of the pits with sufficient material being taken to give a 25-50 pound sample for processing.

PROCESSING UNIT

The processing unit used consisted of four screens stacked in an aluminium frame plus a sluice-box.

The screens are mounted in trays 20" x 20", and their opening sizes are j in., 6 m, 16m, and 26 m. The screens are stacked at 4-9nch intervals one above the other, with the final product through the 26m passing down the sluice-box.

The sluice-box is 7 ft. long and 8 in. wide, and is lined with rubber waffling matting.

2.

The volume of watter passing through the unit is controlled, as well as the slope of the sluice-box adjusted, so as to give maximum riffling effect.

PROCESSING PROCEDURE

Each sample was washed through the screens; a hand is used to facilitate the breaking-up of any semi-consolidated material and to speed up the passage through a specific screen. , Care is taken not to overload the screens or the riffle-matting. As the sample is washed through the screen, a lookout is maintained for mineralized clasts. A watch is also kept for evidence of visible gold on the riffle-matting.

Riffling is continued until the sample has been reduced to approximately two ounces of concentrates. In some cases, hand- panning is resorted to to reduce the sample to this size. The sample is then dried and the magnetite content removed by a hand-magnet. After this, the remaining concentrate is briefly examined under the microscope for any build-up in sulphides and of gold grains. It is then submitted for a total gold assay.

PROGRAMME fit RESULTS

In the Fall of 1983, backhoe pitting on magnetic highs located till below varved clays in one pit, - namely 83-B1. The presence of till came as a surprise as it was not considered likely so close to the surface in the area.

A radiometric survey (ref. 4) indicated a low-lying area, in the northwest corner of L613379 and southwest corner of L613378 claims, was two to three times more radioactive than normal for a swamp. This tended to indicate that a few boulder erratics occuring in this area and previously noted in ref. l was not underlain by varved clays so characteristic of the area as a whole but probably by a till. For this reason, a programme of backhoe pitting and till sampling was initiated.

A total of 15 pits was dug in the Fall of 1984, and of these six encountered a till. Counting a pit dug in 1983, - 83-Bl, this gave a total of

seven pits giving till samples. All of these seven pits fell in the area suggested as different by the radiometric survey.

The till encountered in all the pits was loosely consolidated, grey to tan -coloured, with a mixture of relatively small pebbles and occasionally a large (several feet in diameter) boulder erratic. There was no evidence of bedding or sorting to suggest it was an outwas.-h. type deposit. Likewise it did not resemble a true basal type in that it was not a hard consolidated type with a mix of variously sized and shaped pebbles, cobbles, etc. The milky discharge from the processing unit indicated it had a significant rock-flour content.

The pebbles, etc. , were a mix of greenstones, granites and gneisses. No mineralized or diagnostically altered types were noted. Muscovite was an obvious constituent of the granites and gneiss pebbles and also in the sand fraction.

During the processing, no gold grains were noted on the riffle iats, and also none during the microscopic examination of the concenti trace of sulphides was noted in the concentrates of all samples.

The assay results as given by the assay laboratories are attached as Appendices 3 and 4. These results are summarized in Appendix 5. As indicated in the latter, a distinctly measurable amount of gold up to 0. 04 oz. per ton was present in the concentrates; however, when redistributed to the total sample, the amount present in them is small.

In summary, the programme indicated the presence of measurable amounts of gold in the concentrates from till samples taken from the pits on the claims. The total goldiruthe till is probably not more than that normally present. The evidence also suggests the till is not a true basal type but a ground moraine type deposited by a retreating glacier.

G. E. Parsons.Toronto, Ont. July 1985

LEFERENCES

1. Geologic Assessment ReportClaims L613376-81

Beatty Twp., Larder Lake Mining Div. Sept. 14, 1982 G. E. Parsons

2. Magnetic Assessment ReportClaims L613376-81

Beatty Twp., Larder Lake Mining Div. Oct. 1982 G. E. Parsons

3. VLF-EM Assessment ReportClaims L613378 and -79

NE| fc SE^ of N| Lot 12, Con. I Beatty Twp., Larder Lake Mining Div., Nov. 1983 G. E. Parsons

4. Radiometric Assessment ReportClaims L613378-79 and L765091-92

Beatty Twp. , Larder Lake Mining Div. Jan. 1985 G. E. Parsons

5.

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix l

Appendix Z

Appendix 3

Appendix 4

Appendix 5

Appendix 6

Appendix 7

Sample Location k Pit Description

Location Sketch of Samples

Geoscience Lab. Report for Sample 83B1

11 Results for Sample 84-B1 etc.

Gold Assay Results of Till Samples

Swastika Lab. Invoice 11167

Tabulation of Expenditures

APPENDIX l

Sample Location and Pit Description

Sample No.

83-B1

84-B1

84-B2

84-B3

84-B5

Location *

84-B6

84-B13

W N

800

840

1050

1600

900 1700

900 1790

975 1350

700 1300

830 1430

Depth in ft. of Pit

17

17

17

17

Description of Pit

16

1,7

0-14 varved clay 14-17 till

O -12 tan coloured till withpieces of clay

12-17 a wet grey till

0-2 weathered soil 2-17 a light grey till

0-1 weathered soil1-15 tan coloured till15-17 wet grey blue till

0-4 weathered varved clay 4 -8. 5 till8. 5-9 blue silty fine clay on

bedrock

0-2 soil; 3-6 clay 6-16 grey till, some large

boulders , one of rustymica granite

0-2 soil 2-17 grey till

* Zero point is No. 2 post of claim L613378, - i. e. the SE corner of N| Con. I, Lot 12, Beatty Twp.

All distances and depths are in feet.

It X 17'X l'

84-^1-***a i a KIT'IT

4-'B l

36K1-7X 3

-BS

10

l*.

nKI7XB

LG/33 79

14 X3

SKETCH TILL SAMPLES C L. LSI 3378, -7?

BEATTY TWR, O NT.SCALE: i in 1200 f T.

83

4A/

A/l k

S /t Con l

/4pp. 2

/^m\ MiniStryof Ontario 77 Qrenville Street Q, W] Natural Geological To^!Tom*.o L*VJtX Resources Survey MSSIBS p.Ontario Telephone 865-1 337 re

)OSCi0nCtt Report NO. -iboratorias B 152S8jport Oete

Nov. 1, 1984

G. Parsons, 136 Chat sworth Drive, Toronto, Ontario M4R 1S2

Fire Assay Determination

Sample Number

83-B1

f.

'

Gold oexwexab*

O.OOOOSOg

\. 000030^

O.\)00116g

0 1 0(10(16 5 g

0 *00do30g

0.0/OOltpg

Oy000015,g

9^000055^

Silver Oz. Per Ton*

1

': ' ' '' : ; ". , ' i;.'

Pee* Received ,$70.00 R?p.|^C35637^ & 1 Coup. Card 13419

Chief Antlyit

* Note: 1 Oz. Per Ton is equivalent to 34.3 Parts Per Million.

Except by ipedaTpefmtoion reproduction of these rasuits must include any qualifying remarks mad* by this Ministry with reference to any sample.

SWASTIKA LABORATORIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO

TELEPHONE: (705) 642-3244 ANALYTICAL CHEMISTS * ASSAYERS * CONSULTANTS

ffiwttftait* of Analyaifi

Certificate No. 60254

Received June 12/85 ______6,

Submitted by G. E. Parson, Toronto, Ontario

Date: June 17 1985

Samples of concentrate

SAMPLE NO.

Bl

B2

B3y

B5

B6

^ B13

(Total)GOLD

rag

0.038

0.054

0.029

0.053

0.021

0.025

Total Weight

42.24 g

38.23

42.64

34.62

48.86

43.33

Per. ^J .G. Lebel Manager

ESTABLISHED 1 928

APPENDIX 5

Gold Assay Results of JTill Samples

Sample No.

83-B1

84-B1

84-B2

84-B3

84-B5

84-B6

84-B13

Depth (ft) of Sample

17

17

17

17

9

16

17

Dry Weight of Sample

grams

18, 100

20,400

12, 250

13, 600

11, 800

13, 150

13, 600

Dry Weight of Cone.

grams

-

42. 24

38.23

42.64

34. 62

48.86

43.33

Total Gold in Cone.

mg.

0.05

0.038

0.054

0.029

0. 053

0.021

0. 025

ppm Gold in Cone.

-

0.9

1.4

0.7

1.5

0.4

0. 6

Oz/ton Gold in Cone.

-

0.026

0.04

0.02

0.04

0. 01

0.017

ppm Gold in Sample

. 003

. 002

.004

. 002

. 0045

. 0016

. 0018

o o 11167

SWASTIKA LABORATORIES LIMITEDP.O. BOX 10, SWASTIKA, ONTARIO POK 1TO TELEPHONE: (70S) 642-3244

Mr. G* E*SAME

f DATE

June 18/85

136 Chatswc Toronto, Or M4R 182

SHIPPED VIA

QUANTITY

'.......6..........

irth Drive ttarlo

FED LICENCE NO

Au Assays on oonoentral Cert. No. 60254 Jum

i

PROV: LICENCE NO

UESCRIP1 ION

3di 17/85,^

———~ \

\YOUR ORDER NO

11 1. S& late charge over 30 days 1 (annual rate 18%)

OUR ORDER NO TERMS

1

.. ... .... .... ........ . . f

AfafJ*^ O*

IVrf"*! .

SALESMAN ^\

UNIT PRICE J AMOUNT 1

? 8.50

.,.,..;.................,.....

S

a

WAST1KA ll"" ""V-L.J

JE\.

*T** /^

$ 51.00

-- ----- --..-..-.-

^ORATORIES LTI

\ n rprlayjp* l

ffirTTTTr^

^T^ erf AA

MOORE BUSINESS FORMS 3 7060EANALYTICAL CHEMISTS * ASSAYERS * CONSULTANTS ^

FACTURE l I NVOICE ESTABLISHED 1928 0̂

APPENDIX 7

Tabulation of Expenditures Till Sampling, Processing fe Assaying

1. Collecting Samples

2| days (25 hrs. ) @ $20/hour $ 500. 00 ' (l day Oct. 26/83; 2 days Oct. 6-7/84)

2. Transportation Field to Processing Centre \

Car mileage 100 km @ 24^/km , 24. 00 /O [)/\ ^, ' '

3' Labour Processing Samples

28 hours @ $20/hr 560.00 {Sept. 19/84, June 3-4/85)

4. Microscopic Examination of Concentrates for Gold

4 hours @ $20/hr 80 .00 l/

5. Assaying Concentrates

See Appendices 3 and 6 in report 57. 00

6. Tabulating Results, Preparing Report k Sketches

2 days @ $300/day 600.00 (June 18 fe July 6/85)

7. Typing fc Duplicating Report 200. 00 B. Parsons

^2, 021.00

Notes:(1) Car mileage is based on ODM 1983 rates

(2) All labour of l, 2, 3 fe 4 was by the writer; cost allowancebased on the job being approximately one-third professional at $35/hr. and two-thirds manual at $15/hr to give an average of $20/hr. These hourly costs include all costs of field support, etc.

(3) Costs for 3 fe 4 include equipment used.

42A09SW0e57 Z .6342 BEATTY 900

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 09 23 Your File! 284 Cur Fi1*1 f.8342

Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 4 Government Road East Kirkland Lake* Ontario P2N 1A2

Dear Sin

RE: Notice of Intent dated September 3* 1985 Data for Assaying on Mining Claims L 613378, et al* 1n Beatty Township

The assessment work credits* as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so Indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely.

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phonet(416)966-4888

D. K1nv1g;mc

cci Garf1eld E. Parsons 136 Chatsworth Drive toronto, Ontario M4R 152

cct Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario

End.

cci Mr. |.Wr fergusonMining i Lands Commissioner Toronto* Ontario

Ministry of .Technical Assess) Natural ,. f , - ... Resources Work Credits

Ontario 4^

Tient File

2.8342D*te ^ ^^ ^^ Mining Recorder's Report of

1985 09 03 workU. 284

Recorded HolderSARFIELD E. PARSONS

Township or AreaBEATTY TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Magnetometer days

Other . flays

Section 77 (19) Se* "Mining Claims Attested" column

fipnlngiral riays

fienrhpmiral riays

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision CD Ground O

D Credits have been reduced because of partial

coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections

to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

S1997.00 SPENT ON ANALYSES OF SAMPLES TAKEN FROM MINING CLAIMS:

L 613378 -79

133 ASSESSMENT WORK DAYS ARE ALLOWED WHICH MAY BE GROUPED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 76(6) OF THE MINING ACT.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

- NO ASSESSMENT CREDIT MAY BE GIVEN FOR TRANSPORTATION COSTS.

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on

each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

828 (83/6)

ano

Ministry ofNaturalResources

1985 09 03 Your File: Our File:

2842.8342

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.For further information, if required, please contact Mr. R.J. Pichette at 416/965-4888.

urs sincerely,

Land Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3

j|. D. Kinvig:mc

Ends.

cc: Garfield E. Parsons136 Chatsworth DriveToronto, OntarioM4R 1S2

cc: Mr. G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto, Ontario

845

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Notice of Intent

for Technical Reports

1985 09 03

2.8342/284

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that yotj will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Land Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be .issued.

BAB IB2JB)

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: Please type or print.- If number of mining claims traversed '

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Spryey(s)

Claim Holder(s)

^

r r -~fr r -e cess,/ nTownship or Area

Prospector's Licence No.

Address ^ _*Pr-Survey Company Date of Survey (from St to)

Mo.

Total Miles of line Cut

Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric t

- O ther

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

s

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed ^ \

^ 1 7 t/3)Performed on Claim(s)

42--7?

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date ent(Signature)

Certificatiot/verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Total number of mining claims covered by this report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

X*

Date Recorded

AUG 1 2 1985Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder \ \\

Branch Director y j

l hereby certify that t have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal of Person Certifying

(SI 'Of

Date Certifitified n

dJv05f7r/

Certified bv/fSioneturej"

1985 08 15 File: 2.8342

Mining Recorder Ministry of Natural Resources 4 Government Road East Kirkland Lake* Ontario P2N 1A2

Dear Sir:

We received on August 7, 1985, Data for Assaying oh Mining Claims L 613378-79 1n Beatty Township.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with your office prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:mc

cci G.E. Parson136 Chatsworth Drive Toronto, Ontario M4R 1S2

136 Chats worth Drive,

Toronto, Ont.

M4R 1S2

To: G. E. Parsons

IN ACCOUNT WITH

BERYL PARSONS

re: Typing, reproducing, and assembling

report on Beatty Claims L613378-79

$200. 00

Payment received:

RECEIVEDAUG - 7 1985

MINING LANDS SECTION