Asymmetry in Binding and
Cleavage Specificities Found
for Homing Endonuclease I-AniI
KMkcat
Asymmetry in kcat and KM
Specificity Shifts for Designed Enzymes Modulating kcat or KM
-8G:C
+8C:G
Current Projects
• Design and selection toward target site• Built-in negative Selection System• Homologues and their target sites• Second shell effects (learning from
homologues)
FANCA_32: TTAGCAGCTCCCTCTGTCTC
WT site: TGAGGAGGTTTCTCTGTAAA
Benchmarking Selection System
M5 (with and without I55V) survives with a single-target site, so used in all selections
Arshiya Quadri
Wt "-8g" "-6c" "-3c" "+3a" "+8c"0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
M5 Pendo Plasmid with competent cellls containing pccdb Ts
Target Site Positions
% C
olon
y Su
rviv
al
Built-in negative selection
pENDO-HE
p15A origin
HE ORF
pBAD promoter (arabinose inducible)
bla
araC
Unwanted HE target sites
Results of Negative Selection
Benchmark: Recovery of -8G and +8C highly specific designs in this selection -> putting design directly in (works) and using a randomized library to try and recover them (going to sequencing). Using this selection in combination with other selection for -9T and for improving single-base pair designs.
Arshiya Quadri
Wt "-8g" "-5c" "+3a" "+8c"0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Target Site Position
% C
olon
y Su
rviv
al
Second shell effects and homologues• Current endonuclease design is generally
limited to target DNAs close to the sequence observed in crystal structures
• Redesign of the overall curvature of LAGLIDADG endonucleases to expand the range of targets to DNA sequences assuming different conformations
• Influence of second shell effects (core especially)
• Vdi and Mso - Fabio• Onu and Ani and other uncharacterized
homologues - Summer• Computational: analyzing homologues
sequences and incorporating information into designs (Justin and Fabio)
• Experimental: transplanting residues and selection (Summer and Fabio)
• Identifying homologue target sites is not trivial• New method: using the selection system to identify the target sites
Flexible-backbone design and second-shell mutations (justin) i.e. how to make Rosetta stabilize new backbones in a realistic and conservative fashion
wildtype I-MsoI,wildtype -11 CYT, -10 ADE
designed I-MsoI,-11 THY, -10 THY
superposition
The protocol that generated this result was:
“ccd” backbone design w/ 2nd shell mutations, with BLOSUM62 constraints because Rosetta over-mutates
multistate design of DNA contacts only, for specificityiterative