+ All Categories
Home > Documents > ate-shells-14218.pdf

ate-shells-14218.pdf

Date post: 01-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: florinelvv
View: 217 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 15

Transcript
  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    1/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20141

    Using Shell Elements in

    ANSYS Mechanical

    ANSYS Technical Support

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    2/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20142

    Agenda

    • Background

    • Element Technology

     – Solids

     – Shells

     – Solid-Shell• Geometry Modification Options

     – Mid Surface Extraction

     – Surface Extension

     – Misc. (Virtual Topology, Repair, …) 

    • Shell Connections Methods

    • Demo

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    3/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20143

    Background

    The analysis of thin and slender structures can

    benefit from computationally efficient shell

    modeling.

    Thin structures:

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    4/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20144

    • Element topologies: shells, beams,

    solid shells, connections (MPC

    contact, springs, dampers, joints,

    spotwelds…). 

    • Mid-surfacing Technology enables

    3D solids to be modified so that

    they can be meshed with shellelements.

    Thin Structures:

    Background

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    5/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20145

    Conventional 3D Solid 185/6/7 elements 

    Element Technology

    • Geometrically & spatially 3D

    • Three displacement degrees of

    freedom at each node

    • Supported by Enhanced StrainTechnology

    • Suitable for modeling 3-D bulk solid

    structures

    • Not typically suitable for thin

    structures in bending

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    6/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20146

    Conventional 3D Shell181/281 elements 

    • Geometrically 2D, but spatially 3D

    • Six degrees of freedom (three in

    translation, three in rotation) at each

    node.

    • Suitable for modeling 3-D thin to

    moderately-thick shell structures.

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    7/38© 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20147

    Thin Shells (Love/Kirchhoff)

     – The cross-sectional plane initially

    normal to the midsurface of the shell is assumed to

    remain straight and normal to the neutral axis

    during loading. This assumption excludes shear

    deformations.

    Moderately-Thick Shells (Mindlin/Reissner)

     – The cross-sectional plane initially

    normal to the midsurface of the shell is assumed to

    remain straight but not remain normal to theneutral axis during loading. The shear strain, as a

    result, is constant across the section.

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    8/38© 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20148

    3D Solid-Shell Element (SOLSH190) 

    Element Technology

    • Geometrically and spatially 3D

    • Three translational DOF at each node.

    • Has 7 internal DOF, similar to Enhanced Strain but

    decoupled in bending direction.

     ─  condensed out at the element level

    • Performs well in simulating plate structures with a wide range of

    thicknesses (from extremely thin to moderate thick).

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    9/38© 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 20149

    Solid185 with enhanced strain and Solid186 show transverse shear locking, when

    the structure is really thin, e.g L/t =1000

    L/t = 1000, transverse shear stress

    Umax=0.035, but should be 1

    Solid185 Solid186

    Umax=0.83, but should be 1

    L/t = 1000, transverse shear stress

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    10/38© 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201410

    Thin wall structure – with Solids

    Remedy:

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1 6 11 16 21 26

    Number of Elements Per Edge

       N  o  r  m  a   l   i  z  e   d   M  a  x .

       D  e   f   l  e  c   t   i  o  n

    Solid185 (enhanced strain)

    1. Increase the mesh density (very expensive)

    2. Use midside node Solid elements (expensive)

    Umax=1

    Umax=1

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1 6 11 16 21 26

    Number of Elements Per Edge

       N  o  r  m  a   l   i  z  e   d   M  a  x .

       D  e   f   l  e  c   t   i  o  n

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    11/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201411

    Thin wall structure – with Shells

    0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1 6 11 16 21 26

    Number of Elements Per Edge

       N  o  r  m  a   l   i  z  e   d   M  a  x .

       D  e   f   l  e  c   t   i  o  n

    3. Use Shell elements - needs the mid-surface

    transverse shear stress Umax=1

    4. Use Solid-Shell elements - needs a swept mesh

    transverse shear stress Umax=1 00.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1

    1 6 11 16 21 26

    Number of Elements Per Edge

       N  o  r  m  a   l   i  z  e   d   M  a  x .

       D  e   f   l  e  c   t   i  o  n

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    12/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201412

    Shell vs Solid vs Solid-Shell

    • Simple example of buckling of arch

    shown on right

     – Calculation of load required to inducebuckling

     – Comparison of SHELL181, SOLID185and SOLSH190

    • For thin structures, SOLSH190

    matches SHELL181

     – SOLID185 requires additional elements

    along edge

    • For thick structures, SOLSH190matches SOLID185

    3rd mode thick

    elem/thick elem/edge 1.00E-03 1.00E-02 1.00E-01 1.00E+00 2.00E+00

    SHELL181 1 10   3.7496 3750 3.74E+06   3.09E+09 1.64E+1020   3.4509 3451 3.44E+06   2.89E+09 1.57E+10

    50   3.3743 3374 3.37E+06   2.84E+09 1.55E+10

    SOLID185 1 10 3533.8000 39403 4.31E+06   3.55E+09 2.23E+10

    20 50.9320 4096 3.48E+06   3.23E+09 2.07E+10

    50 3.7035 3386 3.38E+06   3.14E+09 2.04E+10

    3 10 3534.0000 39403 4.31E+06   3.49E+09 2.13E+10

    20 50.8300 4096 3.48E+06   3.18E+09 1.99E+10

    50 3.6230 3386 3.38E+06   3.10E+09 1.96E+10

    5 10 3533.8000 39403 4.31E+06   3.45E+09 2.04E+10

    20 50.9040 4096 3.48E+06   3.14E+09 1.91E+10

    50 3.6708 3386 3.37E+06   3.07E+09 1.88E+10

    SOLSH190 1 10   3.7232 3722 3.72E+06 3.40E+09 2.23E+10

    20   3.4530 3445 3.44E+06 3.17E+09 2.07E+10

    50   3.3751 3373 3.37E+06 3.11E+09 2.04E+10

    3 10   3.6055 3722 3.72E+06 3.37E+09 2.13E+10

    20   3.4384 3445 3.44E+06 3.15E+09 1.99E+10

    50   3.3764 3373 3.37E+06 3.09E+09 1.96E+10

    5 10   3.4980 3722 3.72E+06 3.33E+09 2.04E+10

    20   3.4201 3445 3.44E+06 3.12E+09 1.91E+10

    50   3.2714 3373 3.37E+06 3.06E+09 1.88E+10

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    13/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201413

    Thin wall structure – options

    3. Solid-Shell:

    - needs to be sweep meshed

    2. Surface Body mesh (Shells):

    - might need mid-surface tool

    and shell mesher

    1. Solid Body mesh:

    - needs a robust solver

    for very large models

    Element Technology

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    14/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201414

    How do we analyze thin structures effectively?

    Assuming the structure is too

    large and complex to bemeshed effectively with

    conventional solid elements ,

    there are two options

    available

    • Shells with mid-plane

    extraction (right)

    • Solid-Shells (Left)

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    15/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201415

    Only Surface Bodies can be meshed with SHELL elements

    Surface Bodies can be generated by multiple methods:

    • From Edges

    • From Sketches

    • From Faces

    Defining Surface Bodies

    Planar

    surface

    Non-planarsurface

    Existing solid body edges

    are selected for new

    surface boundary.

    New, frozen, surface body generated(note, solid body is hidden).

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    16/38

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    17/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201417

    Mid-Surface ToolManual Method

     – Select pair of faces, one pair at a time, in FacePairs input

     – The order of selection determines the surface

    normal directionDetails View of Mid-Surface

    Color of faces after selectionSolid Model Color of faces during selection

    Normal

    Direction

    1st Pick

    2nd Pick

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    18/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201418

    Mid-Surface Tool

    Automatic Method (many control options)

    • Bodies to search: Limits search to VisibleBodies, Selected Bodies, or All Bodies

    • Minimum and maximum threshold sets search

    range (thickness) for face pairs

    Selection Tolerance: Allowable deviation fromperfect set

    • Thickness Tolerance: Allows grouping ofmultiple pairs into one set within this value.

    • Sewing Tolerance: max allowable gap between

    surfaces

    • Extra Trimming provides options for removing unwanted face pairs

    • Preserve Bodies? allows you to save the solid bodies from which

    surfaces are created (default is No)

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    19/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201419

    Gap

    Mid-Surface ToolTolerances

    Sewing Tolerance:

    • If gaps exist in adjacent face pairs, they will be sewn

    together within the Sewing Tolerance

    • If Gap < Sewing Tolerance, Surfaces are grouped and

    connected (Conformal Mesh between them)

    Selection Tolerance:

    • Tolerance is used to detect face pairs in case of imperfect

    offsets

    Without Selection

    Tolerance Selection tolerance value is

    suggested to user

    All the pairs detected

    successfully with

    Selection tolerance

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    20/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201420

    Joint ToolJoint

    Joins surface bodies together such that their contact

    regions share common edge. Prerequisite for conformalmeshes.

    Takes two or more surface bodies as input

    Imprints edges on all bodies where they make contact

    Surface bodies after Joint

    Surface bodies to be Joined

    Details View of Joint

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    21/38

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    22/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201422

    Repair holes

    Repair Holes Tool

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    23/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201423

    • When to use?

     – To merge together a number ofsmall (connected) faces/edges

     – To simplify small features in themodel

     – To simplify load abstraction for

    mechanical analysis – To create edge splits for better

    control of the surface mesh

    control

    • Virtual cells modify topology

     – Original model geometry remainsunchanged

     – New faceted geometry is createdwith virtual topology

    Virtual TopologyWithout VT With VT

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    24/38

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    25/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201425

    • The “ideal” connection method for shells is to have

    shared topology so the mesh is fully connected.

    • In some instances, this is not possible/desirable, so

    need to use:

    • Contact

    • Mesh Connections

    • Spot Welds

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    26/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201426

    • SHELL-to-SHELL Linear Connection (Edge/Edge)

    MultiBody Part:

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    27/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201427

    • Types of Contact Detection available between solid and surface bodies:

     – Face/Face: contact between faces of different bodies

     – Face/Edge: contact between faces and edges of different bodies

     – Edge/Edge: contact between edges of different bodies

    • Face/Edge and Edge/Edge contact only applies to solid and surface bodies. – Contact relationships involving line bodies are not supported.

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    28/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201428

    • By default only Face/Face contact is considered

    Global control of all connections Local control of grouped connections

    Face/Edge and/or Edge/Edge contactoptions should be turned to Yes

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    29/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201429

    • SHELL Connectivity

    • SHELL-to-SHELL Linear Connection (Edge/Edge)

    Edge-to-Edge Contact :

    Every formulation available

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    30/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201430

    • SHELL Connectivity

    •SHELL-to-SHELL Linear Connection (Edge/Edge)

    The default, “Target Normal, Couple U to ROT” , creates too many constraints, causing

    an artificial stiffness at the connection and resulting in a discontinuity of stress

    and strain distribution that should not be there

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    31/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201431

    “Target Normal, Uncouple U to ROT” creates CEs that separate the rotational and

    displacement DOFs into separate equations….

    SHELL Connectivity

    SHELL-to-SHELL Linear Connection (Edge/Edge)

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    32/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201432

    - “Target Normal, Uncouple U to ROT” produces expected results

    … to remove artificial stiffness at the connection, 

    thus improving results for special applications.

    SHELL Connectivity

    SHELL-to-SHELL Linear Connection (Edge/Edge)

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    33/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201433

    Mesh connection : Allows you to join the meshes of topologically disconnected

    surface bodies:

     – Previously connections such as this required a geometry application to repairgaps (e.g. DesignModeler or CAD).

     – Mesh connections are made at the mesh level using either edge to edge or edgeto face configurations.

     – Unlike geometry solutions, a multibody part is not required.

    Mesh Connection

    Example

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    34/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201434

    • Mesh connections use the concept of master and slave geometry to control

    how the connection is made: – Master: indicates the geometry/topology onto which other geometry is projected.

     – Slave: indicates the geometry that will be projected onto the master geometry.

     – Master geometry can be faces or edges whereas slave geometry can only be edges.

    Slave

    MasterProjection

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    35/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201435

    When to Use Mesh Connections:

    • When there are disconnects in a surface model, the mesh connection feature

    allows the model to be joined via a conformal mesh.

    • Mid surfacing often results in situations where gaps exist in a surface model.

    Mesh connections are especially useful in these situations.

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    36/38

    © 2011 ANSYS, Inc. July 3, 201436

    Mesh connections work at

    part level:

    • As a post mesh operation

    • Base part mesh is stored to

    allow for quick changes in

    connections

    Shell Connection Methods

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    37/38

  • 8/9/2019 ate-shells-14218.pdf

    38/38

    • For further information on ANSYS software please contactyour local representative

    (www.ansys.com/About+ANSYS/Contacts+and+Locations)

    • or email [email protected] 

    • Forthcoming webinars - www1.ansys.com/customer/webinars

    Thank you for your interest today

    Thank you!

    http://www.ansys.com/About+ANSYS/Contacts+and+Locationsmailto:[email protected]:[email protected]://www.ansys.com/About+ANSYS/Contacts+and+Locations

Recommended