+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging...

Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging...

Date post: 31-Dec-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 2 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
39
Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018 Professor John Blaxland Strategic & Defence Studies Centre @JohnBlaxland1 [email protected]
Transcript
Page 1: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Australia’s Geostrategic Position

in 2018Professor John Blaxland

Strategic & Defence Studies Centre

@[email protected]

Page 2: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Strategic & Defence Studies Centre

Page 3: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

A Geostrategic SWOT Analysis for AustraliaStrengths (internal)• natural resources• Strong economy• Educated workforce • Boutique, honed & hi-tech ADF• Leverage from US hi-tech, Intel & interoperability ____________________________________________________Opportunities (external)• SWP: climate, resource & social challenges provide opening

for greater Australian leadership • ASEAN: regional and sub-regional appetite for closer

Australian engagement & investment• NE-Asia: trade growth opportunities • Indian Ocean: Growing ties to India and beyond• ROW: UK, France etc interest in Australia

• Weaknesses (internal)• Complacency about security & our place in the world • Uneven pop’n distribution-SE-Aust coastal fringe & big cities• Oil Refinery fuel dependency• Power vulnerabilities & Underdeveloped solar/nuclear power• Cyber dependence & vulnerabilities____________________________________________________Threats (external)• foreign interference• Cyber attack – industrial, military state & non-state actors• US transactional retreat from ideational leadership• Politically & religiously motivated violence at home & near

abroad• US-China rivalry turns violent• Conventional +/or thermonuclear war - Korean Peninsula,

SCS, ECS, Taiwan, Iran, etc

Page 4: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

The Indo-Pacific, Centrality of Australia& SE Asia as the ‘maritime fulcrum’

Page 5: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

US Alliance Prospects• US National Defence Strategy

• Russia & China at the forefront• Countering Terrorism secondary• “America First but not America Alone”• Expectations of Australian support • DPRK …

• Without America?• “America will lose, and China will

win”

Page 6: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

America’s EnduringAsia-Pacific Presence

USA

USA

• Guam

Aleutians

Page 7: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

But Growing PRC Assertiveness

Page 8: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

China’s Tiny EEZ c.f. Australia & the Pacific(& why SCS matters so much to China)

Australia - territory: 7.69km2; EEZ: 10m km2China - territory: 9.3m km2; EEZ: 877k km2 / 3.87m km2 claimed

Page 9: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Arbitral TribunalRuling July 2016

• None can lay claim to a 200 nautical mile EEZ or a continental shelf

• Rocks for the purposes of Article 121 (entitled to a 12 nautical mile territorial sea at best)

• Scarborough Shoal, • Cuarteron Reef, • Fiery Cross Reef, • Gaven Reef (North), • McKennan Reef, • Itu Aba, • West York, • Spratly Island, • South-West Cay and • North-East Cay

• Low-tide elevations that generate no maritime zone • Hughes Reef, • Gaven Reef (South), • Subi Reef, • Mischief Reef and • Second Thomas Shoal

Page 10: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

But China ignores it and Duterte’s complicit

• Maritime Law Enforcement• White Painted Ships• Fisheries Militia• Might is Right

Page 11: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

SE Asia Perceptions of Influence over time

11

5

6

7

8 8 8

7

6 6

7

8

9

NINETEENTH C EARLY 20THC 1900-1918

MID-20THC 1919-1945

COLD WAR POST-COLD WAR

GFC UNTIL TODAY

Median ratings

United States China

Figure 1

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The US had the most significant influence on Thailand in the Post-Cold War years to 2008 (average 8.2) and the least significant influence during the nineteenth century (average 4.5). Officer Cadets are the least likely (rated 8-10) to think that the US had an influence on Thailand in the Cold War (55%; cf. Civilian 75%*, Lt/Capt 86%*, Major 76%, Lt Col 76%, Col 71%, Above Col 69%*). Why do respondents believe US influence was greater after the Cold War? Why do they think it fallen since the GFC?
Page 12: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Plan B: The Australian Foreign Policy White Paper

• “Indo-Pacific” & US Alliance, but emphasis on …

• Regional multilateral forums• Quad: US-Japan-India-Aust

• ASEAN

Page 13: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Quad or Not?• Bilateral ties already

strong• India realignment

dependent on Modi?

• Japan enhanced strategic partnership (tbc)

Page 14: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Quad or Not?• Whither NZ?• Wither SE-Asia?

•ASEAN:Fulcrum of the Indo-Pacific

Page 15: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

IndonesiaKey to understanding Australia’s outlook

• 250m people• 17K+ islands• 3rd largest democracy• Largest Muslim popn• Contentious relations

with Australia• “Maritime Fulcrum”

Page 16: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Indonesians: wary of Australia

• History of disagreements:• Konfrontasi – 1963-66• Papuan sovereignty - 1969• East Timor -1975 & 1999

President Joko Widodo & the TNI

Page 17: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Snakes & Ladders• Mended fences after Timor:

• Silver lining to Bali bombings & Indian Ocean Tsunami

• But problems persist:• Timor, beef, boats, spies,

clemency, Papua

• Yet Australia’s security inextricably linked with Indonesia

Page 18: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Complexity of ASEAN today (unity in diversity?)

Differences: • ethnic• religious• economic• historical • geographic • political • strategic• cultural • linguistic

Page 19: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Growing Trade Links with ASEAN

• 10 countries• 637m people• GDP USD2.5 trillion• $93.2 Billion trade with

Australia• 3rd largest trading partner• AANZFTA/TAFTA/MAFTA/SAFTA

Page 20: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Growing links to ASEAN:Education, Tourism Migration

• 1million visitors• 110K students

enrolled• 896K Australian

residents with SE-Asian heritage

Page 21: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

ASEAN’S ASPIRATIONAL INFLUENCE?

• Proto-Great Power• But Consensus basis …• & China’s influence precludes one voice

• insistence on bilateral talks

• So, limits to utility, but ties important

Page 22: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

SWP Security Challenges

• Surge in Great Power Interest & Competition

• Lucrative EEZs

• Environmental challenges (fisheries/sea level)

• Governance challenges (corruption/narcotics/violence)

• Time for Grand Bargain for shared governance?

Page 23: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Responding to DPRK Threats & => wrt PRC• US force posture optimized for action• Brinkmanship – breakthrough or precipice?• Expectations of ADF role in conflict?• BMD

• Aegis / SM3 THAAD

Page 24: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Missile Defence Options:

Source: Federation of American Scientists Special Report No 1 2011

Page 25: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains
Page 26: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Kim Trump Summit Implications

• USFK?• UN Command• Japan• Taiwan,• ASEAN• Australia • India• Iran

Page 27: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Transnational Security Concerns:

• Networked extremists• Rise of “Islamic State” (Daesh)

• Philippines – Mindanao - Marawi• Malaysia – Bangsamoro /Sultanate of

Sulu• Indonesia – Jemaah Islamiya?• Thailand - BRN• Singapore• Cambodia?

• Bali bombing repeat?• Transnational Crime• Piracy

Page 28: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Rohingya Crisis• Arakhan Rohingya Salvation

Army - ARSA • Pakistani Jihadist links

• Tatmadaw brutality• UN impotence• Bangladesh impoverished• Next wave of Boat People?• Next Stop: Malaysia, Thailand,

Indonesia, Australia?• Regional Solution?

Japan, Thailand, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Australia

Page 29: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Irregular/Unregulated People Movement

Page 30: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Sweeter and broader ties

• A MANIS regional maritime cooperation forum should be established to address a range of shared concerns

• drawing in expertise from participating ministries

• foreign affairs, • defence, • border protection, • police forces,• environmental authorities,• universities,• think tanks

Page 31: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Philippines/Malaysia/Indonesia- form maritime pact to curb IS

• Aug 2016: DefMins RyamizardRyacudu, Delfin N. Lorenzana(right) & Dato Seri Hishamuddin

• Aim: to secure Sulu Sea from piracy, terrorism, human trafficking and drug smuggling.

• Options for added respectful Australian cooperation

31of 80

Page 32: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

“Our Eyes” Sub-Regional CT & Intelligence Network 2018

• Unprecedented regional CT collaboration• Indonesia’s Def-Min, Ryamizard Ryacudu, instrumental• Aust – US – Japan observers : Potential for

Page 33: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Australia-Singapore Comprehensive Strategic Partnership

• Ties akin to NZ CER & security ties• Growing range of shared security & economic interests• But Singapore under pressure from China …

Page 34: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

What This Means• Sound relations with Indonesia

fundamental • Recognise ASEAN significance but fragility• Continue engaging China constructively,

encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK

• Recognise China’s gains as undo-able short of war

• Closer regional traditional & NTS ties• “Middle Power” engagement, bolsters ties:

• ASEAN/FPDA/MANIS/”Our Eyes”/Japan/India

Page 35: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

A Geostrategic SWOT Analysis for AustraliaStrengths (internal)• natural resources• Strong economy• Educated workforce • Boutique, honed & hi-tech ADF• Leverage from US hi-tech, Intel & interoperability ____________________________________________________Opportunities (external)• SWP: climate, resource & social challenges provide opening

for greater Australian leadership • ASEAN: regional and sub-regional appetite for closer

Australian engagement & investment• NE-Asia: trade growth opportunities • Indian Ocean: Growing ties to India and beyond• ROW: UK, France etc interest in Australia

• Weaknesses (internal)• Complacency about security & our place in the world • Uneven pop’n distribution-SE-Aust coastal fringe & big cities• Oil Refinery fuel dependency• Power vulnerabilities & Underdeveloped solar/nuclear power• Cyber dependence & vulnerabilities____________________________________________________Threats (external)• foreign interference• Cyber attack – industrial, military state & non-state actors• US transactional retreat from ideational leadership• Politically & religiously motivated violence at home & near

abroad• US-China rivalry turns violent• Conventional +/or thermonuclear war - Korean Peninsula,

SCS, ECS, Taiwan, Iran, etc

Page 36: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Averting CatastropheRethinking Ties Between Economics, Security, Stability, Prosperity & Prospective Existential Threats

Grand Challenges:• Critical review of the spectrum of

global security challenges• Economic security• Environmental challenges• Political and human security• Cyber security• Maritime, territorial & homeland

security

• DFAT role?

Page 37: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Australia’s Geostrategic Position

in 2018

Professor John BlaxlandTwitter: @JohnBlaxland1

Page 38: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Strategic & Defence Studies CentreProfessor John Blaxland

Page 39: Australia’s Geostrategic Position in 2018...Continue engaging China constructively, encouraging mutual restraint • OBOR/BRI , AIIB, SCS, ECS, DPRK • Recognise China’s gains

Recommended