of 10
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
1/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
MSL STEERING COMMITTEE
ASSESSING GLOBALIZATIONAND SUPPLY CHAINSTRATEGIES OF AUTOMOTIVEMATERIAL SUPPLIERS
Francisco Veloso
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
AN EMERGING GLOBAL VALUE CHAIN
Effects
Drivers IncreaseOutsourcing
Reduction in directOEM suppliers
Standardization
Market growthBarriers to importsLow factor costsNo worker barriers tonew forms of supplychain organization
New OEM andsupplier investments
Experiments withnew manufacturingand sourcing
systems
Industry TrendsOpportunities inEmerging Areas
Supply chaindisaggregation
New supplier roles Pressures on suppliersfor global presence
and performance
SupplierStrategies
Global Specialists Global Integrators Firm Consolidation
Regional innovativesupply solutions
Industryexpansion
and new formsof supply chain
organizationtaking place in
emergingregions
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
2/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
75%
80%
65%
65%
70%
50%
45%
INCREASING VEHICLE OUTSOURCING
Source: Wards; Automotive News
1997
2000 (est.)
PSA
Renault
Fiat
1985
Percentage of Vehicle Value
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
75 7465 61
25 2635 39
48.3
VEHICLE GLOBAL SALES TREND
Source:Automotive News, IMC - Forecast
54.4 62 68100%=
Emerging markets
Triad
Forecast
1994 1999 2005 2010
Demandgrowth willtake placemainly inemergingmarkets
Millions ofVehicles
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
3/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
SUPPLIERS AGGRESSIVE MARKET EXPANSION
Company Major Products Globalization Strategy
Federal MogulUS
Sales increased 276% from 1997 to 1998.
Growth strategy: focused acquisitions
Components forEngine Systems
SimoldesPortugal
Sales increased 52% from 1997 to 1999
Development through investment in newplants in France and Brazil
Injection moldedcomponents forinteriors
ZaniniSpain
Sales increased 30% from 1997 to 1999.
Growth both through acquisitions andgreen field investment in Europe, LatinAmerica and India
Hub Caps
Source: Company web pages, Federal Mogul 10k report
Large and Small firms alike
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
VALUE CHAIN DISAGGREGATION
Example Situation Impact of spin-off
Shed estimated 10-12% overhead Increased sales from $1.5 to $2.0 bil.
Sales doubled by 1994 Highly profitable Major innovator in diesel technology
Early examples of disaggregation are showingincreased cost savings and innovation due to a higherlevel of entrepreneurship as a higher scales achieved
Early examples of disaggregation are showingincreased cost savings and innovation due to a higherlevel of entrepreneurship as a higher scales achieved
Growth in sales of 116% of offurther-processed products from1996 to 1997
GM internal axle,chassis component,spun off in 1994
GM diesel engineproducer, taken overby Roger Penske
Fiats Stampingoperations in Brazilpassed to Usiminas
Usiminas
Detroit Diesel
American Axle
Source: Industry Press; Mckinsey
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
4/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Commodities
Small Stamps
Small InjectedParts
Low Value Added
Build to Print
Development
Components
Door
Dashboard
ABS
High Value Added
Black-Box Design
Differentiated
Commodities
Rear View Mirror
Fuel Injector
Steering Column
Medium Value Added
Grey-Box Design
Component Subsystem System
2nd + Tier 1st Tier
Growth Strategy
SUPPLIER POSITIONING IN THE VALUE CHAIN
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Source: Automotive Industries; Wards Automotive Reports; Hoovers online
In 1985 most auto revenues came fromselling seat frames
Entered complete seats businessthrough acquisitions:
! Ford (1993) and Fiat (1994) operations
! Automotive Industries (1995)
! Keiper, Dunlop Cox and ITT (1997)
! Delphi and Hyundai businesses (1998)
These purchases included globalnetworks in virtually the whole world
Growing to be a full interior supplier
! Acquisitions and JV to accesstechnology in acoustics, instrumentpanels and trims
Dana core products include axles,brakes, driveshafts, structuralproducts and engine components
Now moving to provide completemodular systems across the world
Leading example is complete chassisto new Chrysler Dakota pickup truck
! Invested $15 million in new plant
! Incorporates 200 parts from 70suppliers
! Represents one-third of truck value
! Chassis assembled and placed inChrysler's line within 2 hours oforder
Danas Brazilian Rolling Chassis Lear seat and interior integration
EXAMPLES OF SYSTEM INTEGRATION
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
5/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
CONSOLIDATION TREND WITHIN SUPPLIERS
Worldwide Sales
5
11 13
28
36
4715
24
25
32
291520
1992 1995 1998
Companiesinsegment
less than $100 million
$100-$500 million
$500-$1000 million
$1,000-$5000 million
over $5,000 million
Source: Automotive News
Largest 100 North American based suppliers
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
MATERIAL SUPPLIER COMPETITOR PERSPECTIVE
From
Supplier of steel coils orblanks
Global supplier ofaluminum ingots
...
To
Supplier of fully formed bodyparts to the assembly line
Global supplier of aluminumcastings
...
Goal: Explore new global opportunities generated in theauto supply chain through the development ofinnovative material based solutions that can generateincreased value added for the OEMs and the supplier
Critical issues yet unanswered:
What value do new supply chain configurations generate?
Who is more likely to capture the value created?
Which strategies ought to be pursued by materials suppliers?
Focusof
Research
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
6/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
MATERIAL SUPPLIER EVOLUTION IN SUPPLY CHAINFrom To
Regional or global
automotive raw materialsuppliers
Global raw material supplier,
component manufacturer orsystem integrator
RawMaterialSupplier
Global car
integrator
StandardSetter
ComponentSpecializer
RawMaterialSupplier
RawMaterialSupplier
RawMaterialSupplier
ComponentSupplier
SystemIntegrator
Assembler Distr ibu tor
RawMaterialSupplier
SystemIntegrator
Assembler Distributor
RawMaterialSupplier
Componentstandardsetter
Global car
integrator
StandardSetter
RawMaterialSupplier
SystemIntegrator
Assembler DistributorComponentspecializer
ComponentSpecializer
Global car
integrator
StandardSetter
RawMaterialSupplier
Assembler DistributorComponentspecializer
SystemIntegrator
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Fiat
CASE STUDY: USIMINAS-FIAT STAMPINGS
Add value to its product
Move downstream into highervalue products
Sales growth of 116% onfurther-processed products from1996 to 1997
Investment in press shop? Sharing presses among clients? Factor costs? Logistics costs? Other?
Reason:
Usiminas
Expected
Benefits
Impact
onCosts
Release space and resourcesto invest in assembly capacity
Increased capacity Reduced asset intensity
Manufacturing vs. Sourcing
cost? Logistics costs? Other?
Reason:
Expected
Benefits
Impact
onCosts
Assess economic implications of the 1993 agreement tosubcontract part of Fiats stamping operations to Usiminas
Goal:
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
7/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
EXPECTED EFFECT OF OUTSOURCING ON COST
Cost Driver Effect Reasoning
Factor Costs Margin on raw material sale is reduced Usual OEM wage premium is absent in supplier Reduced transaction costs on scrap material
Logistics Costs Increased cost of transporting finished goods
rather than raw materials
Fixed Costs Shared capacity among several clients Cost of capital in OEM vs. Supplier can go either way
Processing Costs Stamping technology and practices are likely to be
the same
Overhead Costs Depend on efficiency of firm organization Can initially assumed to be the same
TOTAL COSTS
Important to assess difference in cost to
understand implications of decision for bothsupplier and assembler
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
CASE STUDY: ALUMINUM ENGINE BLOCKS IN BRAZIL
Disadvan-tage
Advantage Capabilities alreadyin place
InexpensiveManufacturing
Aligned with industry trend
Lighter more efficient carsare a plus in Brazil due togasoline price
Full economies ofscale in foreign plants
No local investment orlong term commitmentto one supplier
Solution againstindustry trend
Preventsinternational
alignment ofpurchases
Important investment todevelop local capabilities
Low scale may requireseveral automakers to
commit to one supplier
Expensive logisticscosts
Significant importcosts due to
Brazilian regulation
Continue with CastIron Engine Blocks
Import Cast AluminumEngine Blocks
Breed Local Manufacturersof Cast Aluminum Blocks
There are important economic trade-offs betweenscale, required investment and logistics
There are important economic trade-offs betweenscale, required investment and logistics
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
8/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
ALUMINUM ENGINE BLOCK COST BEHAVIOR
$0
$20
$40
$60
$80
$100
$120
$140
$160
$180
0
25
,000
50
,000
75
,000
100
,000
125
,000
150
,000
175
,000
200
,000
Production Volume
Cost
Aluminum Brazil
Aluminum Importsfrom Germany
CROSS -OVERCROSS -OVERInvesting inBrazil is a
difficultdecision due to
limited andfluctuating
scale
Very preliminary results
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
CASE STUDY: HYDROFORMED ENGINE CRADLE
ILLUSTRATIVEILLUSTRATIVE
Cases Considered :
Integrated Hydroformer:Integrated Tube Maker:Integrated Tube/Hydroformer:Integrated Materials-to-Tube Maker:Integrated Materials-to-Hydroformer:
HydroformerTube
MakerSlitter
Material
Supplier
Rover 75
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
9/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Inventory
2.6% Warehousing 0.4%Transportation 8%
Maintenance 5%
Building 1%
Overhead
8%
Tooling
16%
Machinery6%Energy
2%
Labor
6%
Materials
45%
11%Logistics
Cost
36%
Fixed Cost
53%
Variable Cost
COST BREAKDOWN OF BASE CASE
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Sensitivity for Material Supplier in Supply Chain
$28.00
$30.00
$32.00
$34.00
$36.00
$38.00
$40.00
$42.00
$44.00
Material
Cost
Scrap
Price
WageR
ate
Costof
Capital
Utiliz
ation
CostperPart
25%/yr
3 shifts
2 shifts2 shifts
10 %/yr10 %/yrBase CaseBase Case
$31.42/part$31.42/part
$0.56/kg$0.56/kg
$0.50/kg $0.08/kg $6/hr
$40/hr$40/hr$0.04/kg$0.04/kg
8/2/2019 Auto Motives Supply Chain
10/10
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Cambridge, Massachusetts Materials Systems Laboratory
Costs by Process Step
ILLUSTRATIVEILLUSTRATIVE
Carrying
Warehousing
Transport
Maintenance Cost
Building Cost
Overhead Cost
Tooling Cost
Main Machine Cost
Energy Cost
Labor Cost
Material Cost
Fixed
Logistics
Slitting Tube Making Hydroforming
Variable
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CostperPart,
%
$14.90
$17.08
$31.42