Date post: | 15-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | shannon-porter |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Autumn Term 2013 1
Corporate FinanceFundamentals of Financial ManagementDr. Markus R. NeuhausDr. Marc Schmidli, CFA
Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
2Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected] Term 2013
Corporate Finance: Course overview 201320.09. Fundamentals M. Neuhaus & M. Schmidli
27.09. No lecture
04.10. Interpreting Financial Statements M. Neuhaus & M. Schmidli
11.10. Mergers & Acquisitions I & II (4 hours) M. Neuhaus & S. Beer
18.10 Investment Management M. Neuhaus & P. Schwendener
25.10 Business Valuation (4 hours) M. Neuhaus & M. Bucher
01.11 Value Management M. Neuhaus, R. Schmid & G. Baldinger
08.11 No lecture
15.11 Legal Aspects Ines Pöschel
22.11 Turnaround Management M. Neuhaus & R. Brunner
29.11 No lecture
06.12 Financial Reporting M. Neuhaus & M. Jeger
13.12 Taxes (4 hours) M. Neuhaus & M. Marbach
20.12 Summary Repetition M. Neuhaus
3Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Grade Chairman Qualification Doctor of Law (University of Zurich), Certified Tax Expert Career Development Joined PwC in 1985, became Partner in 1992 and CEO from 2003 –
2012, became Chairman in 2012 Subject-related Exp. Corporate Tax
Mergers & Acquisitions Lecturing SFIT: Executive in Residence, lecture: Corporate Finance
Multiple speeches on leadership, business, governance, commercial and tax law
Published Literature Author of commentary on the Swiss accounting rulesPublisher of book on transfer pricingAuthor of multiple articles on tax and commercial law, M&A, IPO,
etc. Other professional roles: Member of the board of économiesuisse, member of the board
and chairman of the tax chapter of the Swiss Institute of Certified Accountants and Tax Consultants
Markus R. NeuhausPricewaterhouseCoopers AG, Zürich
Phone: +41 58 792 40 00Email: [email protected]
Autumn Term 2013
4Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Marc SchmidliPricewaterhouseCoopers AG, Zürich
Phone: +41 58 792 15 64Email: [email protected]
Grade Partner Qualification Dr. oec. HSG, CFA charterholder Career Development Corporate Finance PricewaterhouseCoopers since July 2000 Lecturing Euroforum – Valuation in M&A situations
Guest speaker at ZfU Seminars, Uni Zurich, ETH, etc. Published Literature Finanzielle Qualität in der schweizerischen Elektrizitätswirtschaft
Various articles in „Treuhänder“, HZ, etc.
Autumn Term 2013
5Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Contents
Learning targets Pre-course reading Lecture „Fundamentals of Financial Management“
Autumn Term 2013
6Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Learning targets
Financial management
Understanding the flow of cash between financial markets and the firm‘s operations
Understanding the roles, issues and responsibilities of financial managers
Understanding the various forms of financing Financial environment
Knowing the relevant financial markets and their players
Being aware of various financial instruments
Autumn Term 2013
7Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Contents
Learning targets Pre-course reading Lecture „Fundamentals of Financial Management“
Autumn Term 2013
8Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Pre-course reading
Books Mandatory reading
Brigham, Houston (2012): Chapter 2 (pp. 25-53) Optional reading
Brigham, Houston (2012): Chapter 1 (pp. 2-21) Volkart (2011): Chapter 1 (pp. 43-69) Volkart (2011): Chapter 7 (pp. 579-604) Bodie, Kane & Marcus (2009): Chapter 12 (p. 384-395)
Slides Slides 1 to 11 – mandatory reading Other Slides – optional reading, will be dealt within the lecture
Autumn Term 2013
9Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Contents
Learning targets Pre-course reading Lecture „Fundamentals of Financial Management“
Autumn Term 2013
10Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Agenda I
1. Introduction
Setting the scene
Who is the financial manager?
Roles of financial managers
Shareholder value vs. Stakeholder value concept
2. Financing a business
External financing
Internal financing
Asymmetrical information
Pecking order theory
Capital structure
Autumn Term 2013
11Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Agenda „fundamentals of financial management“ II
3. Financial markets
Different types of markets
Financial institutions
Financial instruments
Efficient market hypothesis (EMH)
4. Q&A and discussion
Autumn Term 2013
12Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Agenda: Introduction
Setting the scene
Who is the financial manager?
Roles of financial managers
Shareholder value vs. stakeholder value concept
Autumn Term 2013
13Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Setting the scene I
(1) cash raised by selling financial assets to investor
(2) cash invested in the firm’s operations and used to purchase real assets
(3) cash generated by the firm’s operations
(4a) reinvested cash
(4b) cash returned to investors
Firm‘s operations
(a bundle of real assets)
Financial markets(investors holding financial assets)
Financialmanager
(e.g. CFO)
(1)(2)
(3)
(4a)
(4b)
Company “Environment”
Source: Brealey, Myers, Allen (2012), 34.
Autumn Term 2013
14Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Setting the scene II
Managers do not operate in a vacuum Large and complex environment including:
Financial markets
Taxes
Laws and regulations
State of the economy
Politics, public view, press
Demographic trends
etc. Among other things, this environment determines the availability of investments and
financing opportunities
Therefore, managers must have a good understanding of this environment
Autumn Term 2013
15Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Who is the financial manager?
Chief Financial Officer (CFO)(responsibilities:
e.g. financial policy,financial planning)
Treasurer(responsibilities: e.g. cash management,currency trading, banking relationships)
Controller(responsibilities: e.g. preparation of
financial statements, accounting, taxes)
Source: Brealey, Myers, Allen (2011), 34.
Autumn Term 2013
16Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Roles of financial managers
Generally, managers do not own the company, they manage it The company belongs to the stockholders. They appoint managers who are expected to run
the company in the stockholders’ interest Basic goal is creating shareholder value
two problems emerge from this constellation
Agency dilemma: asymmetric information and divergences of interests between principal (stockholders) and agent (management) lead to the so called agency dilemma which also arises in the context of financing decisions ( pecking order theory)
Shareholder value vs. stakeholder value: shareholders own the company. Does a company merely consider the owners’ interest or the interests of all stakeholders affected by the company’s business activities?
Agent Principal
performs
hires
Em
pir
e b
uild
ing,
in
dep
en
den
ce,
hig
h s
ala
rie
s Stab
le g
row
th,
divide
nd
s, con
trol
Illustration: Agency dilemmaAlso see Brealey, Myers, Allen (2011), 37-43.
Autumn Term 2013
17Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Shareholder value vs. stakeholder value I
Shareholders’ wealth maximization means maximizing the price/value of the firm’s common stock Shareholders are considered as the only reference for the company’s course of business and
performance Other stakeholders are strategically considered only to the extent they could have an impact on the
stock price, the stockholders’ wealth
Suppliers
StateInvestors
Customers
Employees
Value
If a new pharmaceutical product is launched, health considerations will be relevant only to the extent they could endanger the firm’s stock price (e.g. through a lawsuit)
Where does the risk in the shareholder value concept lie? ( incentives, sustainability)
Also see Brealey, Myers, Allen (2011), 37-43.
Autumn Term 2013
18Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Shareholder value vs. stakeholder value II
Stakeholder value means maximizing the company’s value taking into account every stakeholder the company affects in the course of its business
The importance of stakeholder management is continually growing
Suppliers
State
Customers
Employees
Value
Investors
If a new pharmaceutical product is about to be launched, every stakeholder’s interest must be assessed and the product is introduced only if every interest can be honored
Does the plant pollute the air?
Could the new product be harmful to customers?
etc.
How can a company motivate its managers towards a careful handling of the company’s stakeholders? ( compensation programs, corporate governance)
Also see Brealey, Myers, Allen (2011), 37-43.
Autumn Term 2013
19Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Agenda: Financing a business
External financing
Internal financing
Asymmetrical information
Pecking order theory
Capital structure
Autumn Term 2013
20Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Possibilities of financing a business
The management makes decisions about which investments are to be undertaken and how these investments are to be financed
There are three basic ways of financing a business
1. Internal
2. Debt
3. Equity
Equity
Debt
Internal financing
Ext
ern
alIn
tern
al
Pecking order theory diagram
Why would a company prefer debt over equity? ( cost of capital)
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 465-466. For further reading also see Brigham, Houston (2012), 438-480.
Autumn Term 2013
21Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financing a business – overview
External financing: A company receives capital from outside the company, e.g. credit, capital increase
Internal financing: The major part of a firm’s capital typically comes from internal financing (retained cash flows, profits from operating activities), except for e.g. startup or turnaround situations
Liquidation financing: In this context, liquidation financing refers to the liquidation of assets (e.g. divesting of certain business areas) which have a financing effect
Debt financing Equity financing Liquidation financing
Credit financing Issuing shares
Internal financing
Financing effect from accruals
Retained cash flows and profits
Mezzanine / Hybrid financing
External financing
Divesting activities
Source: Volkart (2011), 581.
Financing impact fromvalue of depreciation
Autumn Term 2013
22Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financing a business – external financing
Debt financing
Given a solid capital base, the use of debt is reasonable as it broadens the financing base
provided a certain amount of leverage exists and considerable tax advantages1) can be exploited
The risk borne by a creditor is the risk of default driven by the company’s market and operational
risks
Because a bank would not lend money to a company without checking its financial health, a
certain amount of debt gives a positive signal to other business partners
Equity financing
Equity serves as the capital base of a company because equity can not be withdrawn or taken
away from the company
In the case of incorporated companies (e.g. AG), equity bears the major part of the risk
A company can raise equity capital by selling shares privately or publicly (e.g. IPO or capital
increase)
Source: Volkart (2011), 583ff.
1) General rule: Interest expense is tax deductible, dividend distributions not.
Autumn Term 2013
23Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financing a business – internal financing
Internal financing or self-financing
Internal financing is determined by the cash flow from operating activities
Internal financing means generation of cash flows from operating activities without using external sources
Internal financing happens “automatically” as a consequence of the operating activities of a company
From the company’s perspective, self-financing is the most convenient way of financing as the company does not have to debate with creditors and the discussion with equity holders is limited to the question of how much of the profits should be distributed. ( pecking order theory; see Slide 26)
As opposed to external financing, internal financing is not fully reflected on the company’s balance sheet
Source: Volkart (2011), 586ff. Also see Brigham, Houston (2012), 465-466.
Autumn Term 2013
24Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Asymmetrical Information I
The problem of asymmetrical information does not occur only between principal and agents, but arises each time financing is needed as the fundamental interests of debt holders and shareholders differ significantly.
Shareholders assume that management is negatively influenced by debt holders towards making “safe” investments in order to minimize the probability of default
Debt holders will try to establish credit covenants in order to gain more control over investment decisions and the course of business
Shareholders, on the other hand, prefer investment opportunities with potentially high returns as their shares will gain in value as the company’s cash flows grow
As a result, each party tries to influence the management:
Debt holders try to establish favorable credit covenants
Shareholders set incentives through compensation plans
Source: Volkart (2011), 584ff.
Autumn Term 2013
25Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Asymmetrical Information II
Why do the different parties not get together and solve the problem?
Game theory ( Nash) shows us that in such strategic situations with conflicts of interest, each party begins by holding back information in order to strengthen its negotiating position
Shareholders do not know about possible credit covenants whereas creditors do not know anything about the investors’ motivation and decisions
Law prohibits typically a company to disclose all relevant information
in conclusion, we find a triangle situation in which each party tries to maintain or gain as much power and influence as possible in order to secure its interests
Debt holders Shareholders
Management
Autumn Term 2013
26Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Pecking order theory I
Bridging the problems of asymmetric information can be very expensive. The less information an investor has, the higher the required rate of return for the investment is. An outflow is the so called pecking order theory demonstrating the order in which the company prefers to finance its business
Equity
Debt
Internal financing
1. Internal financing No prior explanations to investors or creditors (except for
level of dividends)
2. Debt financing Banks want information about credit risk Management must provide possible creditors with sufficient
and reliable information
3. Equity financing Potential shareholders will challenge the “real” share price
as they have to rely “blindly” on the information given by the management
Shareholders will request a low price as they cannot be sure whether the share is worth the price
This makes equity capital very expensive for a company
Pecking order theory diagram
Source: Volkart (2011), 592ff. Also see Brigham, Houston (2012), 465-466 or Brealey, Myers, Allen (2011), 488-492.
Autumn Term 2013
27Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Pecking order theory II
The importance of the different ways of financing fundamentally changes over the lifetime of a company
From the perspective of a major listed company, internal financing is the most significant kind of financing
Vital influence on conditions for external financing (stable operating cash flows more favorable credit conditions and higher stock prices)
Without solid operating cash flows, a company will not be able to survive
Illustration: How financing preferences can alter over a company‘s lifecycle
Phase ofbusiness
Start up Expansion Consolidation
Preferredfinancing
Private equity / Venture capital
- Equity- Debt- Internal
Internal
Autumn Term 2013
28Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Capital structure
The decisions on how the assets of a company are financed leads to the question:
what is the optimal capital structure of a company? The relation between debt and equity reflects a company’s risk and is also called
financial leverage The optimal capital structure is highly dependent on the industry Investors often urge greater financial leverage, and thus more risk, in order to generate
more profit in relation to the equity capital invested. In addition, interests paid are tax-deductible.
The capital structure can be defined by the debt to equity ratio
Equity
Debt Leverage Financial Equity to Debt
Financial risk increases as the company chooses to use more debt
What is the optimal capital structure?
Source: Volkart (2011), 596ff.
Autumn Term 2013
29Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Agenda: Financial markets
Different types of markets
Financial institutions
Financial instruments
EMH
Behavioral Finance
Autumn Term 2013
30Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Basic need for financial markets
Businesses, individuals and governments need to raise capital
Company intends to open a new plant
Family intends to buy a new home
City of Zurich intends to buy a new generation of trams
Of course, people and companies save money and have money of their own. However, saving money takes time and has opportunity costs
Mr. Meier earns CHF 10’000 per month and has expenses of CHF 7’000. If he intends to buy a home worth CHF 1’000’000, it will take him a long time to
save enough. But what if he wants to buy this home today?
In a well-functioning economy, capital flows efficiently from those who supply capital to those who demand it
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 26ff.
Autumn Term 2013
31Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financial markets
Physical asset vs. financial asset markets Spot vs. future market Money vs. capital markets Primary vs. secondary markets Private vs. public markets
Recent trends: Globalization of financial markets Regulation and international cooperation of regulators Increased use of derivative instruments, especially as risk management (hedging) and
speculation instruments. The current financial crisis reduced the total size of the derivatives market substantially. However, it is still far bigger in most areas as for instances in 2001.
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 29ff.
Autumn Term 2013
32Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financial Institutions
Investment banks Commercial banks Financial services corporations Insurances ETFs, hedge- and mutual funds Other: Credit unions, pension funds, private equity companies
The trend is clearly towards bank holdings / financial services conglomerates that provide all kinds of services under one roof. The large investment banks disappeared.
Against that, in the current environment many banks are disposing of certain business divisions and focus on core competences. This trend will continue for regulatory reasons (lower risks, de-leveraging, etc.) and some trends towards nationalization and “home market” focus in the banking sector.
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 34f.
Autumn Term 2013
33Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Financial instruments
Stock: Unit of ownership which entitles the owner to exercise his voting right on corporate decisions and receive a certain payment (dividend) each year. No other obligation, nor any loyalty required.
Bond: The issuer (company) owes the holder (investor) a certain amount of debt and is obliged to pay the holder a certain interest rate (coupon) and to repay the initial amount at a pre-determined date.
Option: Financial contract which entitles the buyer to buy (call option) or sell (put option) a certain underlying asset at a pre-specified price at or before a certain point in time.
Structured product: Packaged investment strategy, a mixture of different investment instruments, mostly derivatives which are intended to exploit, for instance, a certain market constellation.
Autumn Term 2013
34Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Efficient market hypothesis (EMH) vs. behavioral finance
The EMH states that
(1) share prices are always in equilibrium
(2) the prices reflect all available information (e.g. on opportunities or risks) and everything that can be derived from it
Therefore, it is impossible to “beat the market”
Prices in financial markets react very quickly and fairly to new information
Share prices are unpredictable as the information that influences prices also occurs by chance.
We can analyze past stock price developments, but we cannot foresee any
future results
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 47ff.
However, investors are no machines that can process all available information.This may lead to the fact that irrational factors come into play
behavioral finance
Autumn Term 2013
35Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Behavioral finance I
Behavioral finance assumes that investors may not always act rationally when investing in financial markets, primary due to observed market anomalies.
Behavioral finance is based on two key elements.
The theory is based on findings from psychology and suggests that irrational behavior arises as the EMH falls short of considering how investors and managers come to a decision.
Behavioral finance also shows that possibilities of arbitrage are limited.
Criticism states that behavioral finance is not an unified concept which explains different anomalies but is rather based on different elements.
Autumn Term 2013
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 50; Bodie, Kane & Marcus (2009), 384 ff.
36Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Behavioral finance II
Irrationalities due to: - Forecasting errors: investors typically attach too much weight on recent experience- Overconfidence: people tend to overestimate their abilities- Conservatism: too slow to react to new information in the market- Sample Size Neglect and Representativeness: investors often incorrectly assume that a
small sample of historical evidence will be representative of future performance- Framing: how decisions are framed affect the decision making process- Regret Avoidance: unconventional decisions lead to more disappointment if the outcome
is negative
Possible limits to arbitrage are:- Fundamental Risk: there is an uncertainty about how long an investor will have to wait
for the stock to fully reflect its value- Implementation cost: transaction costs can make it unattractive to exploit the mispricing- Model Risk: valuation model of the security is incorrect
Autumn Term 2013
Source: Brigham, Houston (2012), 50; Bodie, Kane & Marcus (2009), 384 ff.
37Markus Neuhaus I Corporate Finance I [email protected]
Final comments
As the environment (capital markets, society, suppliers etc.) has significant influence on a company, the financial managers must have a profound understanding of this environment in order to make the right decisions
A financial manager makes decisions about which investments are to be undertaken and how these investments are to be financed (treasurer) and accounted for (controller)
Financing can come either from outside (external: debt and equity) or from inside (internal: internal financing through profit from operating business) the company
The problem of asymmetrical information arises whenever financing is needed, because the level of information and the interests of debt holders and shareholders differ significantly. Bridging these problems can be very expensive and leads to the so called pecking order theory
The theory that capital markets take into account all information and all that can be derived from this information, is called the efficient market hypothesis. However, as explained with the behavioral finance theory, not all investors act rationally in their decision making process.
Autumn Term 2013