Date post: | 01-Jun-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | winner2001 |
View: | 219 times |
Download: | 0 times |
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 1/26
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 2/26
1
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Executive SummaryBecause of the different capabilities and approaches the various software vendors have taken,
Business Process Management (BPM) has become one of the most difficult software products
to evaluate. Along with RFP checklists, BPM software selections are often made based on
vendor demonstrations and, at best, hands-on proof of concepts conducted at a customer’srequest. Because the requirements differ widely between the business and IT, the grading and
weighting factors involved often make BPM product selections opaque, and companies are
often left unsure that they have selected the best product for their needs.
Pegasystems and Oracle are two leading BPM vendors who have taken two completely
different approaches. Because Pegasystems began as a business rules engine provider, their
BPM software product has business rules as its base. Oracle BPM Suite was designed from the
ground up to be a business driven, full lifecycle BPM product running on top of Oracle’s industry
leading Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) platform.
Based on feedback from customers and industry consultants familiar with both products, the
following factors combine to make Oracle BPM Suite the superior choice:
1. Ease of use – Oracle BPM is the easier of the two products to use in three essential
areas. First, the processes are modeled by the business and enhanced by developers in
an easy to understand common format that both understand. Second, both developers
and the business analysts each have tools specifically built for their different skills and
needs. The technical implementation components needed by developers in the tool
they use is masked in the business users’ tool. Third, although both Pegasystems and
Oracle BPM tools are simple for the business analysts to use, developers find Oracle
BPM’s tools for developers much easier to use and much more robust.
2. Service and application integration – Although often overlooked during software
evaluations, the integration to underlying services, databases and applications is an
essential element on almost every BPM project. Oracle BPM’s tool for services and
application integration is the best tool on the market today to accomplish this.
3. Monitoring and administration – Being able to view and manage the environment is
essential during the entire lifecycle of a project. Oracle BPM makes it easy for process
stakeholders to manage and optimize the business processes.
4. Cost – Pegasystems’s PegaRULES product is significantly more expensive than Oracle
BPM Suite. Oracle BPM comes with features that Pegasystems PegaRULES either does
not possess or only includes at an additional charge. It typically costs organizations at
least two times more to purchase the software license and implement a project using
Pegasystems PegaRULES. Pegasystems’s needs for consulting services are also higher,
and it costs seven times more to train a developer to use Pegasystems PegaRULES.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 3/26
2
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
5. Enablement – Oracle BPM Suite is based on the widely used industry standards that
both business and technical people are already familiar and comfortable with. Although
both vendors provide training, anyone wanting to learn how to use Oracle BPM can
download and install it from Oracle’s website at no charge.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 4/26
3
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Evaluation MethodologyRecognized as an expert in BPM, AVIO Consulting has been asked by many organizations to help
evaluate and select BPM products through both product demonstrations, hands-on proof of
concepts and past project implementation experience. The result of these experiences has
been incorporated into this analysis.
The products were also evaluated based on detailed interviews that were conducted. The
interviewees, primarily developers and administrators, were selected based on their hands-on
experience with at least one of the BPM products, and in the case of some interviewees, both
BPM products. Each was asked a series of detailed questions that covered each product’s
business and technical approaches and the features of the product.
Overview of the ProductsBPM products are changing rapidly to keep pace with the demands of the market. As a result,
BPM is becoming more difficult to define and areas once outside of BPM are now fully
integrated in many products.
In its purest form, BPM is used today by companies to create seamless end-to-end business
processes. Using BPM, companies can handle the difficult challenge of integrating existing
systems, outside events, data, documents and human interactions. This means that people and
systems can have discrete activities inside cohesive processes that support the organization’s
business objectives, across different parts of the organization and its different applications. As
work flows through the processes, people have tasks automatically assigned to them at the
right time in the process with exactly the right contextual data they need to do their work.Similarly, as the processes need to integrate with various systems, their services are seamlessly
integrated into BPM processes and invoked automatically at runtime.
Pegasystems is one of the remaining pure-play BPM product vendors still in the market today.
Founded in 1983, it originated as a business rules engine provider. Their business rules
software has gradually transformed over the last 30 years into its PegaRULES Process
Commander (PRPC) product. As the name implies, every facet of the software takes a business
rules based approach to BPM.
Oracle’s BPM product is the result of Oracle’s acquisition of BEA’s pure-play BPM product calledAquaLogic BPM in 2008. In 2010, Oracle completed the integration of their process modeling,
business rules, service orchestration, document management and analytic components into
what now constitutes Oracle BPM Suite. The components are now tightly integrated from both
a design time and a runtime perspective. Oracle BPM Suite is a core component in Oracle’s
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 5/26
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 6/26
5
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
With Oracle BPM, the work done by the business
analysts using the web-based Composer tool is
seamlessly shared with developers, who use the more
technically oriented and standards based Oracle BPM
Studio environment running on the JDeveloper IDE.Both developers and the business analysts access the
same underlying Business Process Modeling and
Notation (BPMN) 2.0 process artifacts through a
common repository. Using Studio, however,
developers add the more technical BPMN 2.0 artifacts
into processes developed by the business analysts
(e.g., events), to easily integrate the services the process needs and to map and transform
complex data from one format to another.
Feature Comparison
I. Design Capabilities
Process Modeling
Process models created in a BPM tool graphically represent how the work will flow to the
various people, systems and applications, once the project is put into production.
PRPC processes are modeled using a small subset of BPMN 2.0’s palette of tasks, gateways and
events. It instead relies on the business rules that underlie every PRPC process to regulate how
work items flow through the processes. As a result, the underlying business rules must be
added at the same time a process is being modeled. The tight binding of the process and
business rules obfuscate the processes, in many cases making them more difficult for the
business to understand. Although in the most recent versions swimlane roles (BPMN lanes) can
be added to PRPC processes, they are optional and rarely added. As a result, to business
people used to seeing BPMN processes, the processes in PRPC look instead like complex flow
charts.
Both Oracle BPM Composer and Studio fully support BPMN 2.0 process pools, swimlane roles,
activities, gateways and events. With Oracle BPM, the process itself determines the flow ofwork items and swimlanes are always used to model the default work assignments. Although
some argue that BPMN 2.0 may be complex for the business to understand, the business
oriented Composer tool handles this by only initially offering a simple palette of the most
commonly used activities, gateways and events visible in its process modeling tool. If the
business user wants to add more detailed activities, gateways or events, they can click the More
button at the bottom of the drag and drop palette.
Differences:
Developers using PRPC require
extensive training and
mentoring to learn theproprietary environment.
The Oracle BPM Studio tool
used by developers is standards
based, well documented and
comparatively simple to use.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 7/26
6
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
In contrast, common BPMN patterns normally modeled in BPM process are instead handled by
PRPC business rules embedded with the process. As a result, some commonly used BPMN
patterns are not supported such as:
BPMN boundary and intermediate events are
not modeled in a PRPC process. BPMN Parallel and Inclusive gateways used to
model multiple people simultaneously working on a
work item are not modeled in a PRPC process.
BPMN Complex gateways that handle the
commonly used voting patterns are not modeled in a
PRPC process.
Although the BPMN Sub-process activity exists
in PRPC, Subprocess looping and multi-instance
patterns (commonly used to separate a batch of items
into separate individual work items) are not supported.
Although PRPC works around these limitations to a
varying degree using business rules, this functionality is
difficult to recreate using PRPC business rules, and the
process diagram itself does not accurately describe
what the process will do once it is activated.
Oracle BPM on the other hand, fully supports all of the
BPMN 2.0 patterns out of the box both at design time
and at runtime. Additionally, because Oracle BPM
supports boundary events, both interrupting and non-
interrupting events are fully supported. Full BPMN
support gives both business users and developers
viewing the process models a clear mutual
understanding of what will occur at runtime. With
Oracle BPM, what is modeled in a process reflects
exactly how it will be executed (i.e. “what you see is
what you execute”).
“ PRPC’s process diagrams made it hard for my team to understand what was
going to be delivered.” – PRPC Project Manager, Major Insurance Provider
Similar to PRPC, Oracle BPM can use business rules to assign tasks. In addition, Oracle BPM can
assign tasks using any of these powerful yet intuitive out-of-the-box patterns:
Differences:
Processes modeled in PRPC use
business rules to determine the
flow, which can be non-intuitive.
PRPC processes are modeled
using a proprietary and abstract
notation that is difficult to
understand.
The BPMN 2.0 artifacts that
cannot be modeled in PRPC
processes are instead
embedded in business rules
under the processes.
Oracle BPM uses standard
BPMN 2.0 artifacts to model
business processes that can be
easily understood by business
people.
Assigning work in Oracle BPM is
more powerful and based on
commonly used patterns.
Oracle BPM Composer allows
snapshots to be taken at various
points in a project’s lifecycle.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 8/26
7
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
User – simple pattern to assign work to a single user, a list of users or everyone in a role.
FYI – inform a user that something has occurred but the work item continues on in the
process.
Management – a sequential series of approvals that automatically escalate up a user’s
management chain.
Group – based on the list of users specified, each user is sent the work itemsimultaneously.
Complex – a combination of any of these patterns.
Although PRPC and Oracle BPM allow various stakeholders to have read only access to the
projects, business analysts using Oracle BPM Composer can take snapshots of a project at
different times in the project’s lifecycle to share a read-only view of the state of the processes
in a project at a specific point in time. It facilitates mutual understanding and collaboration
between business analysts and developers.
“ Process modeling in Oracle BPM is just what I need. It was simple to learn and
it lets me create implementable processes that my whole extended team can
comprehend.” – Oracle BPM Business Analyst, IT Services Provider
Simulation
As processes are modeled, the focus is on the activities, sequence flows, gateways and defining
who owns the work for the various activities in the process. While processes do a good job of
showing the activities and how they are connected to one another, they do not provide the
information regarding the variations that might occur when the process is actually executed in
production. As a result, it is difficult to pinpoint exactly where bottlenecks and cost overrunswill occur once it is deployed into production.
By creating and running simulations, business analysts are able to emulate what will happen
very early in the project’s lifecycle and long before a process goes into production. Simulations
find exactly where process related bottlenecks and budget overruns will occur. The focus can
then be placed on optimizing those areas of the process.
Pegasystems’s ProcessRULES Process Simulator and PegaForcaster are products that can be
added to PRPC at an additional charge, and are used by business analysts to run simulations on
business processes and their associated rules. Based on the estimated work item arrival rate
and the number of resources capable of performing the tasks is input, spreadsheet raw data
must then be exported into Microsoft Excel where the individual rows of data can be viewed
and analyzed. It is a cumbersome extra step.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 9/26
8
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Simulation is much more robust in Oracle BPM Suite in both the business oriented Composer
tool as well as the developer oriented Oracle BPM Studio tool. Simulation features in Oracle
BPM that do not exist in PRPC include:
A simulation wizard can be run in Oracle BPM
that speeds and simplifies the creation of a simulation.A business analyst inputs how many work items should
be created during the simulation and how long (in
simulation time) that the process should run. The
estimated time and cost for each activity in the process
is captured. The probability of the simulated instances
taking one path versus another path is entered for each
exclusive gateway in the process.
Cost estimates for the process and each activity
are automatically determined based on the number of
users assigned to process swimlane roles, their hourlyrate and their productivity.
As the simulation is running, work item queue
backlogs are displayed graphically on the process model
itself. Resources can be dynamically changed to see
how many people would be required to resolve an
activity’s backlog while a simulation is still running.
Simulation results do not have to be exported to
Excel to be evaluated. As the simulation is running, 20
different cost, unit throughput and time metrics are
automatically calculated and displayed graphically.
Once the simulation has completed, the metrics are
displayed inside the tool in the form of pie, line and bar
charts.
Actual runtime statistics from production can be
used in simulations. After an Oracle BPM business
process has been deployed and is running in
production, the process is monitored and a simulation
configuration file representing production runtime
statistics can be imported back into a simulation model.
Using this tool, business analysts can see where bottlenecks are actually occurring and better
judge what the impact of process changes to production will be.
Business Rules
Business rules are either embedded as an integral part of a BPM process or are invoked by the
process where they are used to route and assign work items. The rules consist of business
configurable if-then statements or decision tables that look like spreadsheets.
Differences:
PRPC’s simulation is not
included with the base product.
PRPC’s simulation is very
rudimentary. A simulation’s raw
data must be exported to Excel
to be viewed and analyzed.
Simulation is robust and easy to
use in Oracle BPM. Once run,the simulation’s unit
throughput, time and cost
metrics are displayed as charts
in the same development
environment.
In Oracle BPM, a wizard
simplifies and speeds the
creation of initial simulation
models.
Once deployed, the live process
performance metrics from the
BPM engine can be imported
back into an Oracle BPM
simulation model to help
identify runtime bottlenecks.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 10/26
9
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Because of Pegasystems’s origins as a business rules vendor – most artifacts created in PRPC
have rules embedded. Although business people find the business rules tightly bound to the
processes simple enough to create and maintain, developers are at time constrained by the
business rules. For example, because different services are invoked as work items flow through
a business process, it is common to map one type of data object into another object type.Where Oracle BPM uses a simple drag and drop declarative XSLT standards based diagram to
map the attributes between the data types, PRPC instead takes a more cumbersome approach
of using business rules to map the attributes between the differing data types.
Because of its extensive use of business rules
throughout the product, PRPC is a fit for enterprises
that are already comfortable with PRPC business rules
and for processes that are heavily business rules based.
Oracle BPM Suite includes Oracle Business Rules. Bothbusiness analysts using Composer and developers using
Oracle BPM Studio can create and edit business rules.
Unlike PRPC, business processes created in Oracle BPM
are not tightly bound to business rules. This separation
is intentional and allows the business rules to be
defined separately and in parallel from process
modeling because the two are typically done by people
with differing skill sets. Because the rules are separate
from the processes, the business becomes more agileand adaptable to change. Business people can change
Oracle business rules as often as the business needs
them to change. The changes take effect immediately
without redeploying the associated processes each
time. An Oracle business rule can be added to the processes simply by adding BPMN business
rule activity into the flow of the process. As a work item travels through the process’s business
rule activity, the associated business rule is invoked and the results are returned back to the
process automatically.
Oracle BPM business rules have a business-friendly syntax and can be defined in either if-then
or spreadsheet styles. If created using the spreadsheet style, error checking automatically
detects both overlaps and gaps in the rules.
Differences:
PRPC project artifacts are tightly
bound to business rules
throughout the product even
where a simple declarativediagram would be more
productive and easier to
maintain.
Agility is improved because
Oracle BPM process models and
business rules are loosely
coupled which simplifies
development, provides a
division of labor, and makes iteasy to change a rule without
having to redeploy its associated
process.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 11/26
10
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
User Interface Form Creation
The user interfaces created inside BPM tools are how the information about a work item is
displayed to the end-users at runtime. The user interfaces can display dynamically rendered
graphical charts, graphs and maps to help represent the data.
End user interfaces are created in PRPC using a drag and drop interface. But just like the PRPC
business processes, the user interfaces are rule-based. As forms are created, their embedded
business rules must also be added.
Oracle BPM takes a more commonly used approach to developing end user interfaces. Oracle
BPM’s user interface development tools use a declarative diagram drag and drop / property
driven approach.
Non-technical business people use Oracle BPM’s Web
Form Designer tool to create user interface forms
quickly with very little training. A developer’s
assistance might be required to hide / show or disable /
enable fields and to populate dropdowns because
these rules are created in the tool using JavaScript.
Without having to deploy the project, a business
person using Oracle BPM’s Process Player in Composer
can interactively test the forms associated with each
user activity in the process while still having the
process model displayed. As a work item travels
through the process during testing, each user interface
created in the Web Form Design tool is displayed withdata and executed as a test work item instance flows
through each User activity in the process.
Developers use Oracle BPM Studio’s Application
Development Framework (ADF) tool to create the
complex end-user forms that require sophisticated
controls and functionality. ADF is a best-in-class tool
used by thousands of developers both inside Oracle
BPM and also outside to develop forms in portals,
standalone web applications and in Oracle’s own
Fusion Application packages. It is a complete Model
View Controller (MVC) JavaServer Faces (JSF) standards based environment. Because it is MVC
based, it is transparent where the information displayed on the ADF forms comes from and the
information can include an aggregation of the data coming from the process’s payload, web
services, databases, Java classes and EJBs. Although ADF is a very powerful tool, there is a
steeper learning curve associated with it. Having the assistance of someone who has used ADF
on a previous project will help developers get started.
Differences:
PRPC form development is
based on Pegasystems’s
proprietary rules technology.
With Oracle BPM, both non-
technical business people and
developers can create the user
forms using tools specifically
designed for them.
Oracle BPM’s ADF used by
developers is standards based,
richer in functionality and has a
larger set of AJAX based
components than those included
with PRPC.
Oracle BPM’s Web Form
Designer is simpler to use than
PRPC’s form designer.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 12/26
11
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Data Modeling
Data modeling tools define how information will be stored in a relational database. A diagram
is used to define the tables, how the information is stored in each table, and lines are drawn
between the tables to reflect how the tables relate to one another. For example, a data model
diagram shows that an order can have many order lines by showing an ORDER table and anORDER_LINE table and a line between the two indicating that orders have zero, one or more
order lines. Data modeling is often needed on a BPM project to model how the data is to be
stored. This becomes especially important if information needs to be persisted beyond the life
of a work item in a process.
PRPC does not include a tool for relational database modeling, and if this is a requirement, a
third party tool must be purchased separately.
Having its origins as one of the original relational
database vendors gives Oracle a distinct advantage inthis area. Oracle BPM Studio includes the same tools
that developers have used for years to create and
maintain relational data models.
Logical data models are created declaratively in a
diagram that shows the tables, their foreign keys and
primary keys. The physical tables are then easily created from the logical data model either
through Oracle BPM Studio directly or by the SQL it generates.
IntegrationIntegration refers to a BPM tool’s ability to automatically connect to and invoke backend
systems and databases as work items flow through the processes. One of the key benefits of a
BPM product is its ability to integrate to backend systems inside the tool without developers
having to resort to hand coding the interfaces.
PRPC provides a declarative environment wizard based approach to integrate to the backend
services, databases and applications. The wizards provided are intended to guide developers
through the creation of connectors to the backend systems using native technologies, web
services, Enterprise Java Beans (EJB), .Net, JDBC, Java Message System (JMS) and IBM
WebSphere MQ. Although PRPC’s integration to web services is relatively simple, the
integration wizards to other technologies are difficult to use and are poorly documented.
Developers find PRPC’s browser-based interface both cumbersome and limiting. As a result,
most developers elect instead to hand code in Java.
Difference:
PRPC requires the purchase of a
third party tool to model data.
Oracle BPM includes a best-in-
class data modeling tool.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 13/26
12
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Pegasystems has experienced consultants who should be used to help customers with
integration. Customers considering PRPC should bring in Pegasystems consultants to help with
integration on their first project if it involves more
complex application or data integration requirements.
A key benefit of Oracle BPM Suite is that it is layered
on top of Oracle's SOA platform and its complete set of
best-in-class adapters and tools. Oracle’s SOA
platform is a proven, standards based approach to
exposing and integrating databases and backend
services using standard Java EE Connector Architecture
(JCA) adapters. Some of the adapters included are:
B2B, Business Activity Monitoring (BAM), database,
EJB, File, FTP, HTTP, JMS, MQ and web service
adapters.
Beyond the vendor’s training, learning how to
integrate to services using Oracle BPM can be learned
easily through the documentation inside the tool,
through commercially available books or on Oracle
Technical Network (OTN). Developers can get hands-
on practical experience using Oracle BPM by simply
downloading the software openly available from
Oracle’s website.
Oracle BPM Suite is the best choice to integrate and
supplement Oracle Fusion application packaged
solutions. Oracle Fusion applications are easily made
process-aware and integrated with Oracle BPM
through:
Pre-built integration – Fusion Applications
come with pre-built Oracle BPM processes and the
reusable services required for integration.
Built using Oracle BPM – Both Oracle Fusion
Customer Relationship Management (CRM) and Oracle
Fusion Human Capital Management (HCM) Fusion
applications were created using BPMN processes. This
means that both can be modified and extended
natively using Oracle BPM.
Differences:
Because of the product’sproprietary nature, PRPC
developers require much more
training and mentoring.
Integration to backend services,
databases and applications is
cumbersome in PRPC,
frequently requiring hand
coding in Java and Pegasystems
consultants to assist onprojects.
For training purposes,
developers can get hands-on
experience using Oracle BPM
by simply downloading and
installing the openly available
software from Oracle.
Oracle BPM leverages Oracle
SOA, a best-in-class integration
platform.
Oracle BPM’s Composite
diagram visually represents the
integration between the
components.
Oracle BPM Suite includes
Oracle BPEL, a best-in-class
service orchestration tool.
Oracle BPM uses a simple drag
and drop, standards based
diagram to easily transform
data between services.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 14/26
13
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Each Oracle BPM project has a standards-based Service Component Architecture (SCA)
composite diagram associated with it that is used to not only define the components, but also
to depict how the components are assembled and connected to one another declaratively by
simply dragging the wires between components on the diagram.
Although PRPC processes can invoke exposed services, PRPC does not include the robust
service-to-service orchestration tools BPM projects sometimes require. Where PRPC’s
integration is point-to-point (process to a service), Oracle BPM Suite includes Oracle BPEL
Process Manager’s best-in-class service orchestration tool. Oracle BPEL is a standards based
approach to model services, manage transactions, and handle compensations when exceptions
occur. When complex service orchestration is required, an Oracle BPEL process is invoked
natively from an Oracle BPM process’s Service activity.
As the underlying services are exposed and connected, the data going into and back out from
the service often needs to be transformed from one data schema’s format into another. In
PRPC, the transformation is done using its proprietary business rules. Oracle BPM on the otherhand includes a best-in-class declarative drag-and-drop mapping tool and stores the mapping in
XSLT standard syntax. Using the tool, both simple and complex logic driven mappings are
available as the data is transformed.
“ PRPC is very complicated. We often found ourselves hand coding Java to keep from
having to use it for integration.” – PRPC Developer, Technology Services Provider
II. Execution Capabilities
Business User Experience Although business users select, execute, re-assign,
delegate and escalate tasks similarly in both products,
the collaboration between business users and
developers is handled differently.
In PRPC, business users access their applications using
the same web-based environment that the developers
use. An advantage of this is that it allows direct
collaboration and feedback between the IT developers
and the business people. For example, as an end-user
selects an existing item to work on, they can
immediately rate the effectiveness of user interface
pages and add a sticky note with suggested
improvements that the developer can see. As well as
having the ability to list and perform their assigned
Differences:
Business users on PRPC can
provide feedback to developers
while on a form at runtime.
In Oracle BPM Suite, business
users can be actively involved
in the project’s development.
Using Oracle BPM Suite’s
WebCenter portal, the business
analysts can create, view and
modify business processes,
business rules and user
interfaces.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 15/26
14
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
tasks, PRPC business users are able to interactively collaborate with one another using chat.
Oracle WebCenter is a full featured Web 2.0 portal and collaboration environment, and Oracle
BPM Suite includes WebCenter’s Process Spaces. Process Spaces is role-based, and business
users only see and perform the tasks assigned to them or to their assigned groups based on the
process model’s design. Based on the business user’s permissions, they can also view, create or
modify process models, business rules and user interfaces using Composer’s web user interface.
Business users select and work on process instances from a task list and collaborate with one
another using WebCenter’s chat and wiki. For customers without a portal implementation, the
task list can also be exposed using a web-based Workspace tool or through Oracle BPM’s API.
Content Management
Content management is software that is either bundled with BPM tools or purchased
separately. Its purpose is to manage, version and view files that business users upload, based
on the user’s role and permissions. When used with BPM, content management transparentlyassociates files with specific work items flowing through processes. Content management’s
ability to seamlessly upload and version the files associated with work items is a key element of
most BPM projects.
PRPC does not include content management software
and it must be purchased separately. PRPC can
integrate to content management software packages
that use Content Management Interoperability Services
(CMIS) protocol.
Oracle WebCenter Content is packaged with Oracle
BPM Suite and has out-of-the-box integration with the
product. If a customer has an existing content
management software solution, it can be integrated
with Oracle BPM using the content management
software’s API.
Case Management
Case Management is a feature recently added by most BPM vendors into their products. UsingCase Management, knowledge workers are able to create, manage, maintain and share a case.
The case is a collection of tasks, information, documents and decisions that are made during its
lifespan. Instead of a work item flowing through a pre-determined or deterministic process, a
case in both PRPC’s Dynamic Case Management (DCM) and Oracle BPM’s Adaptive Case
Management (ACM) can be created to dynamically invoke several different processes, which
are managed by a business rule. Individual case workers can invoke sub-cases along the way.
Differences:
PRPC does not include content
management software. Third
party software must be
purchased separately and thenintegrated into the end-user’s
environment.
Oracle BPM Suite includes
content management within
the product.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 16/26
15
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Although included in several BPM tools, Case Management’s practical use will remain
dependent on the level of BPM maturity inside an organization and it will remain limited until
there is a more widespread need for ad-hoc and custom case solutions.
PRPC and Oracle BPM’s Case Management functionality is similar and both include Case
Management as an integral part of the product provided at no additional charge.
Cases are created similarly in both PRPC (using PRPC’s Case Designer) and Oracle BPM (using
Oracle BPM Studio). Developers in both tools define the different processes, tasks, milestones
and the underlying business rules that form the case.
Instead of viewing the individual granular pieces of a case, end-users need an overall view of
the cases at runtime. Cases are managed and viewed similarly in both PRPC (using the Case
Manager Portal add-on) and Oracle BPM (using the Case Space tool inside of Process Spaces).
III. Analysis and Monitoring
Process Monitoring
For business executives and managers, one of the most significant problems with enterprise
software has been the scarcity of meaningful reports that represent the flood of underlying
data. Business Activity Monitoring (BAM) abstracts the raw data and presents meaningful
views of easily understood graphical charts designed in the BAM product. Authorized end-users
can view graphical reports that display the current
status or past status of KPIs and service level
agreements (SLA). Monitoring can be made active bysetting thresholds and then used to automatically send
notifications to workers when a threshold is about to
be reached (e.g. automatically notify a manager and
escalate a work item’s priority when its SLA is about to
expire).
PRPC’s BAM gathers process performance and KPI
metrics as work items flow through the processes.
Pre-built BAM reports can display the aggregated data
inside of PRPC and additional reports can be
constructed by developers.
Although both PRPC and Oracle BPM’s process monitoring tools can automatically trigger
events to respond to KPI performance thresholds being met, Oracle BPM Suite’s process
monitoring has richer functionality and includes two different types of process monitoring
capabilities.
Differences:
PRPC’s BAM only monitors and
displays PRPC’s metrics.
Oracle BPM’s BAM can monitor
events from both inside and
outside of Oracle BPM.
Oracle BPM’s Process Analytics
dashboards can be constructed
by business users.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 17/26
16
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
First, Oracle BPM’s Process Analytics is used by authorized business people to create their own
dashboards using the Workspace and Process Spaces tools. The data displayed in the charts is
aggregated from a star schema database that stores the historical information about work
items as they flow through processes or portions of processes automatically. The performance
and KPI information displayed is based on process, activity, people performance times and thebusiness indicator KPIs built into the process.
Second, Oracle BPM Suite also includes Oracle BAM. Like PRPC’s BAM, it can invoke process
related events when a threshold is reached (e.g., to start or interrupt or escalate a work item),
but Oracle BAM is not limited to displaying process KPIs from within the BPM Workspace and
can also be used by other applications. It can display not only the process information but also
event feeds from outside of Oracle BPM to create a complete picture of the status of the
business. Another difference is that Oracle BAM charts are loosely coupled with Oracle BPM.
This means that Oracle BAM charts can be displayed from within Oracle BPM Spaces and
Workspace as well as from Oracle BAM’s standalone web application or other applications.
Process Intelligence
While BAM tools display pie and bar charts that are populated as instances flow through
processes, some BPM tools also use process intelligence that provides sophisticated real time
analytics to improve the decisions that are being made. Based on the metrics input, processes
are capable of continuing to improve their decisions or suggestions to end-users over time.
Sometimes referred to as intelligent business operations, this enables:
Real time awareness of the actions that should be taken. Cases previously sent to
business users to analyze or approve can instead be handled without human
intervention.
Visibility of events occurring throughout the enterprise and the changes needed.
Faster and better decisions to help drive revenue, decrease cost and improve customer
satisfaction.
Improved compliance and fraud detection.
PRPC’s Next-Best-Action Advisor (N-B-A) is available at an additional charge and is used to help
knowledge workers make better decisions based on its recommendations. When combined
with Pegasystems frameworks, it can be used to improve customer retention, customer loyalty
and cross-selling opportunities.
Similarly, Oracle has a product called Oracle Real-time Decisions (RTD) used to automatically
make decisions and provide recommendations.
Both PRPC’s N-B-A and Oracle’s RTD can provide additional value to the entire enterprise
because they are both loosely coupled with their BPM products. As a result, they can be used
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 18/26
17
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
outside of a BPM work item or process context. The metrics input can come from either inside
or outside of BPM processes, and they can expose their decisions to both BPM processes as
well as enterprise’s other applications and web forms.
If extensive analytics are required for a project, Oracle Business Analytics tools can be easily
integrated with Oracle BPM. It is additional cost but offers extensive process analytics and
reporting that is beyond what PRPC N-B-A can provide.
IV. Technical Components and Capabilities
Runtime Architecture and Tools
PRPC runs on WebLogic, WebSphere and JBoss applications servers and Tomcat web server.
PRPC projects and rules are deployed as JAR files.
Oracle BPM runs on both WebLogic and WebSphere application servers. Unlike PRPC, Oracle
BPM projects are deployed as the industry standard SOA composite EAR files that
administrators are used to deploying.
Pegasystems recommends that their consulting
services be used on projects to help identify and
resolve bottlenecks, add indexes, to increase memory
and to set the database cache and pool threads
appropriately.
Oracle BPM projects on the other hand are already
optimized to run on their targeted application servers
without the need for extensive performance tuning
services by the vendor.
PRPC’s System Management Application (SMA) is an
add-on product that can be purchased at an additional
charge to help monitor memory utilization and the Java
Virtual Machines (JVM). This is an important tool
because as PRPC rules are executed, bottlenecks can
occur as a chain of business rules related to it may alsobe executed. Depending on the length of the chain, performance issues may result.
Oracle Enterprise Manager, an enterprise management solution, is much more comprehensive
and robust than PRPC’s SMA in these important areas:
Using Enterprise Manager, developers easily see how a work item traveled through its
entire path – not only through the Oracle BPM components but also through every SOA
Differences:
Pegasystems consulting
services is sometimes required
to improve the engine’s
performance.
The PRPC SMA add-on has only
a very small subset of Oracle
Enterprise Manager’s
functionality.
Oracle BPM projects run on
application servers without the
need for performance
optimization.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 19/26
18
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
service, human task, business rule and process invoked throughout the work item’s
lifecycle. Developers are able to see the payload into and out of every step in the work
item’s lifespan.
On BPM projects, end-to-end administration and management is essential. Enterprise
Manager is included with Oracle BPM Suite.
Enterprise Manager continuously monitors the health of the entire domain and itscomposites. Performance statistics are viewed and tuned for both BPM composites as
well as the services and transactions invoked outside of Oracle BPM. Individual
composite projects can be started, shutdown, restarted, deployed or removed as
needed.
“ Having used both PRPC and Oracle BPM, as a developer on PRPC projects I
often found myself missing Oracle BPM’s ability to track an item throughout its
entire lifecycle including every process, sub-process, task and service.”
– PRPC Administrator, IT Provider
Frameworks / Process Accelerators
BPM vendors create pre-built industry specific or
horizontal solutions using their products that give
customers a jump start on projects. Pegasystems calls
these Frameworks and Oracle calls them Process
Accelerators. They are built using the BPM tool and
can be deployed as is or customized to meet the
specific needs of a customer. Vendors provide both
industry specific solutions (e.g., financial industry clienton-boarding application) and horizontal solutions (e.g.,
a cross industry Customer Relationship Management
application). They normally include BPM process
models, business rules, end-user interfaces, database
schemas, key performance indicators (KPI), dashboards
and work item payload definitions.
Pegasystems has led both the vertical and horizontal
BPM solution offerings. An industry specific
foundation data model is provided and then on top of
that the customizable PRPC built solution is stacked.
Because of the long learning curve and the difficulty
developers have using the product, these pre-built
add-on solution frameworks are a key element in
Differences:
The Pegasystems Frameworks
are robust and cover a variety
of vertical industries.
Pegasystems charges a
premium price for itsFrameworks.
Beyond the purchase price, also
factor in the cost of
experienced Pegasystems
consultants needed to extend a
Framework solution.
Because of Oracle BPM’s
relative ease of use, Oracle
BPM Process Accelerators are
much easier to extend.
Oracle BPM Process
Accelerators are provided at no
cost to customers.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 20/26
19
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Pegasystems’s success. Once purchased, they are then tailored to fit the customer’s specific
needs.
Pegasystems has hired respected industry experts to help create and market their frameworks.
The vertical Frameworks include applications for Financial Services, Communications,
Healthcare, Insurance, Manufacturing and Public Sector. Pegasystems horizontal frameworks
include Case Management, CRM and Project Management.
Pegasystems frameworks are premium priced. They are extended with the help of Pegasystems
consulting services or their partners. When considering using one of the Pegasystems
frameworks, beyond the price of the BPM tool and the framework, one should also factor in the
cost of the experienced Pegasystems consultants who will be needed to help customize the
solution.
Oracle’s pre-built Process Accelerators became available in 2012. They are built, extended and
deployed using Oracle BPM. Each includes the processes, business rules, payload schemas,
database schema definitions, user interfaces and dashboards needed.
Oracle BPM vertical process accelerators include: Public Sector Incident Reporting, Financial
Service Loan Origination and Business Account Opening. Oracle BPM horizontal process
accelerators include Travel Request Management, Document Routing and Approval, Internal
Service Request and Employee On-boarding. They are provided to customers at no charge and
can be used as a portion of the solution or simply as a training aid to illustrate best practices on
an Oracle BPM project.
Cost ConsiderationsThe cost factors that should be considered when evaluating BPM include software licensing,
maintenance and support, implementation, hardware, training and operational support. The
cost of the pre-built BPM solutions provided by the vendors (PRPC Frameworks or Oracle BPM
Process Accelerators), and the cost of additional software licenses must also be factored in
(e.g., database, application server and content management).
PRPC is significantly more expensive than Oracle BPM Suite. Oracle BPM comes with features
that PRC either does not possess or only includes at an additional charge. It typically costs
organizations at least two times more to purchase the software license and implement a
project using PRPC, which often requires more professional services to implement integration.
It also costs extra to purchase additional software such as content management, and seven
times more to train a developer to use PRPC.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 21/26
20
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Acquisition
Comparing the acquisition costs of PRPC and Oracle BPM is not a one-to-one comparison given
their different licensing models. Pegasystems licenses PRPC on a usage basis with a license fee
for each named user, rule execution and connection to an external system. Oracle typically
licenses on a per CPU basis but also provides an option to purchase on a per user basis.
Two sample scenarios are shown below to help provide context and a comparison between the
two products. It is important to understand that both vendors require an application server
and relational database. PRPC runs on WebLogic, WebSphere and JBoss applications servers
and Tomcat web server. Oracle BPM is certified to run on both WebLogic and WebSphere. In
addition, Oracle BPM requires an Oracle SOA Suite license as well.
Scenario A: Small-Medium Process – Oracle BPM $70,000, Pegasystems over $150,000 (USD).
Regular Named Users: 25
Process Steps/Activities: 25Process Instances Per Month: 1,050
Rule Invocations Per Month: 100,000
Connectors/Integrations: 4
Oracle – This scenario would lend itself to a named user license for Oracle BPM. The
perpetual use license cost would be approximately $70,000 per environment installed.
Oracle also offers customers an entry level restricted-use license alterative called Oracle
BPM Standard Edition. It is priced on a named user model and gives customers an
economical alternative to prove out BPM with a minimal license investment. Pegasystems
does not offer this alternative.
Pegasystems – The license cost for the connectors alone almost equals Oracle BPM’s price.
The additional cost for users and rules invocations raises the price well above $150,000 for
each environment installed. Pegasystems’s license costs are higher primarily because there
is a charge each time a PRPC rule is executed. The number of rules can quickly grow
because of the ubiquitous nature of the rules integrated in the processes, user interfaces
and data transformations required to execute a process.
Scenario B: Large Process – Oracle BPM less than $300,000, Pegasystems over $1 million (USD).
Regular Named Users: 250
Process Steps/Activities: 100
Process Instances Per Month: 100,000
Rules Invocations Per Month: 5,000,000
Connectors/Integrations: 8
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 22/26
21
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
Oracle – This scenario would lend itself to a CPU based license for Oracle BPM. The
perpetual use license cost would be under $300,000 for a quad-core CPU capable of
handling the users and transactions.
Pegasystems – The license cost for the named users alone exceeds the Oracle BPM license.
The added cost for users and rules invocations raises the price well above $1 million.
Oracle BPM Pegasystems PRPC
Software license CPU or User based User, usage, connector, and
invocation based.
Add-ons Process Accelerators, SOA Suite
and WebCenter Portal/Content
Management is included
Frameworks, integrations,
content management software
Requisite Software Application Server, Database Application Server, Database
Entry Level License Oracle BPM SE None
Small License Deal < $250,000 < $550,000
Maintenance and Support
Pegasystems charges 20% of the original license fee annually for Support and Maintenance,
while Oracle charges 22% of the net license annually. Given the higher cost of the license for
Pegasystems in the examples above, the Maintenance and Support fees are correspondingly
higher as well.
Implementation
The most difficult comparison in this analysis is the cost of an implementation. The variation in
skill levels, availability of skilled resources, project requirements and each client’s existinghardware and software environment make implementation comparisons difficult. In both
products, implementations can be achieved from
installation to production within ninety days.
For the purposes of a comparison, assume that
Scenario A above is used and assume that the project
is estimated to take between four to six months from
process discovery to production release. Assume also
that the resources required on the project include two
experienced developers, two inexperienced
developers, relevant subject matter experts and
technical experts. Because PRPC has a longer learning
curve, the inexperienced developers will be less
productive on the project. Developers using Oracle
BPM are normally proficient at the end of their first
Differences:
Pegasystems licenses on a usage
basis versus Oracle’s CPU based
model.
Pegasystems license and
implementation costs are
significantly more expensive
It costs 7 times more to be
trained in PRPC than in Oracle
BPM.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 23/26
22
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
project while PRPC developers are not yet fully productive even on their second project. As a
result, PRPC projects typically take longer time and cost more to deliver.
Training
Training is an essential element for success with any software product and BPM products are no
exception. Both Oracle and Pegasystems offer role-based training that allows business and
technical resources to gain the knowledge needed to use their respective products. Below are
the BPM courses listed by each vendor.
Pegasystems Technical Training
Course Investment
PRPC: Fast Track – Foundation course 5 days
PRPC: Boot camp - Follow-on to the Fast Track course 5 days
PRPC: Senior System Architect – Deep Dive 15 days
PRPC: Lead System Architect – Follow-on 20 days
Pegasystems Business-Focused Training
Course Investment
PRPC: Business Architect Essentials – Foundation course 5 days
PRPC: DCO & Methodology Workshop – DCO tool training 5 days
Oracle BPM Technical Training
Course Investment
Oracle BPM: Implement the Process Model 4 days
Oracle BPM Business-Focused Training
Course Investment
Oracle BPM: Modeling – 3 day model, simulations, BAM
dashboard training
3 days
Oracle BPM: Essentials – half-day self-study – quick overview of
Oracle BPM modeling, simulation, Workspace and BAM
.5 days
As illustrated here, Pegasystems recommends significantly more training than Oracle does. An
investment in training for a technical person to use PRPC can be as much as $18,000 compared
to only $2,400 for Oracle. Also take into account the opportunity cost of the 41 days of lost
productivity in the office.
Other Costs
In addition to the major factors indicated above, other factors should also be considered when
comparing the total cost of Oracle BPM and PRPC. One key factor is that Oracle BPM is bundled
and integrated with a best-of-breed content management system that can be used to store,
secure, and associate documents with the individual process work item tasks. If PRPC is
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 24/26
23
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
purchased, a separate content management system from a third party would also need to be
licensed if content management is required on the project.
“ It was very difficult for us to find trained and qualified PRPC resources for my
project. Because it took us so long to train our own developers, we found
ourselves having to bring in the vendor’s consultants at a much higher cost .”
– PRPC Project Manager, IT Consulting Services Provider
The pre-built solutions provided in Oracle BPM’s Process Accelerators and PRPC’s Frameworks
can greatly speed development time. Although there are more PRPC Frameworks, their license
fee is quite high. Oracle currently offers its Process Accelerators free of charge.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 25/26
24
© AVIO Consulting, LLC 2013
SummaryEven though the different BPM products continue to evolve rapidly, the market is gradually
becoming more mature, and many of the products appear on the surface to have similar
functionality. However, a BPM product that is a perfect fit for one company might easily be a
very poor fit for another. Before beginning an evaluation, one should always ensure that boththe business and technical teams involved have evaluated their needs and have determined the
critical areas of functionality they require.
Pegasystems’s PegaRULES Process Commander (PRPC) and Oracle’s BPM Suite are a microcosm
of the overall BPM market today. The two products have key fundamental and philosophical
differences in the way they approach BPM from both business and technical perspectives.
Cost – The Pegasystems PRPC and its Frameworks have a much higher price point
than Oracle BPM Suite and its Process Accelerators. Oracle BPM comes with features
that PRPC either does not include or only includes at an additional charge. It typicallycosts organizations at least two times more to purchase the software license and
implement a project using Pegasystems PegaRULES. It costs seven times more to train
someone how to develop BPM projects using Pegasystems and its idiosyncratic rules.
Ease of use – Although PRPC is simple for the business analysts to use, it is a difficult
tool for developers to use. Oracle BPM Suite is friendly to both business analysts and
developers. Oracle BPM has robust, standards based and easy to use tools that target
the different needs of business analysts and developers. The processes built in Oracle
BPM are based on the BPMN 2.0 standard, which is much easier for the business and
developers to understand.
Service Integration and Orchestration – Integration to underlying services is much
easier to accomplish using Oracle BPM. Rather than point-to-point connection to
services, Oracle BPM’s BPEL provides best-in-class service orchestration. Oracle BPM
is the product to purchase if backend application and service integration is required
on BPM projects.
Monitoring and Administration – Administrators find it easier to manage the overall
environment, and developers find it easier to debug process issues using Oracle BPM.
Enablement – Although both vendors provide training, both developers and business
people also can learn how to use Oracle BPM by downloading it from Oracle’s
website and installing it at no charge.
8/9/2019 Avio Oracle Bpm vs Pega Comparison 1998344
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/avio-oracle-bpm-vs-pega-comparison-1998344 26/26
AVIO Consulting partners with customers to optimize their investments in middleware
technologies, process improvement initiatives and business strategy / IT capability alignment
efforts. AVIO offers full lifecycle consulting services from infrastructure to implementation,
instructor-led and virtual training and mentoring for BPM and SOA enterprise initiatives.