+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Avoid Placing Vias at the End of SMT Pads - · PDF fileAvoid Placing Vias at the End of SMT...

Avoid Placing Vias at the End of SMT Pads - · PDF fileAvoid Placing Vias at the End of SMT...

Date post: 06-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: dotu
View: 215 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
26
Transcript

Avoid Placing Vias at the End of SMT Pads:

This is especially important if the vias are not masked-over. Placing vias too close to SMT pads will allow solder to migrate off the pad and through the via, resulting in a poor solder joint. Edge of via to edge of SMT pad should be .025” or greater whenever possible, and masking over the via pad is recommended.

Design Check#1

Note how the mask openings for vias and SMT pads run into one another. There is nothing to block assembly solder flow.

Here the openings for the SMT pads are reduced in size, and the via openings are eliminated. All solder will now stay on the SMT pads.

“ EDGE OF VIA TO EDGE OF SMT PAD SHOULD BE .025” OR GREATER WHENEVER POSSIBLE.

- AL WRIGHT

Do Not Route Wide Traces Into Narrow SMT Pads:

Traces which terminate at surface mount pads should be narrower than the pad itself. If the trace is wider, the soldermask aperture, rather than the pad area, will define the area to which surface finish will be applied to the PCB.

The result will be insufficient paste coverage, because the stencil aperture size will match that of the pad only. Using narrow traces also reduces the heat sink effect which can occur when wide traces are present.

Design Check#2

“ TRACES WHICH TERMINATE AT SURFACE MOUNT PADS SHOULD BE NARROWER THAN THE PAD ITSELF.

- AL WRIGHT

Paste will be applied only to the pad areas, but the mask opening exposes the too-wide traces. Solder will spread to the traces on the 1st, 3rd, and 4th pads, resulting in a poor solder joint.

Do Not Route Traces Along Sides of SMT Pads:

Route traces into SMT pads midway along one edge or the other. Some CAD systems will allow a small gap between the pad and the trace, with a short (.005” or less) 90 degree connection to the pad. This can act as a trap for etchant, which will continue to eat away at the trace after the rinse cycle. In some cases these connections will pass bare PCB continuity test, but will fail after thermal shock during assembly. When using tight minimum spacing values, check for such connections and correct the routing manually if necessary.

Routing traces in this manner can also have the effect of creating an oversized “soldermask-defined” pad, similar to the problem caused by wide traces (described above).

Design Check#3

The pad marked X does not need to be routed so close to the pad. Routing it like the checked pad will eliminate the process problem.

“ WHEN USING TIGHT MINIMUM SPACING VALUES, CHECK FOR SUCH CONNECTIONS AND CORRECT THE ROUTING MANUALLY IF NECESSARY.

- AL WRIGHT

Route All Traces at 90 Degrees or Greater:

Never route a circuit trace a less than a 90 degree angle. Acute angle trace junctions can cause manufacturing problems, and can fail later. If you need to double-back in order to complete a connection, use multiple segments.

Design Check#4

Acute angle traces can act as acid traps, and can concentrate stress. Re-route such corners gradually, with a series of segments.

“ ACUTE ANGLE TRACE JUNCTIONS CAN CAUSE MANUFACTURING PROBLEMS, AND CAN FAIL LATER.

- AL WRIGHT

Don’t Place Components Too Close to the PCB Outline:

Place components a safe distance from v-scored edges and breakaway tab locations, so they will not be damaged during de-panelization. Add reference tab locations into your design so that you will be able to see immediately if a component needs to be moved.

Keep SMT devices at least .100” from the PCB edge (more whenever possible) and avoid hand-flexing when singulating after assembly.

Design Check#5

SMT pad is .036” from the PCB edge. OK for a completely routed edge, but increase the distance to >.100” if the edge is a tab or a v-score.

“ ADD REFERENCE TAB LOCATIONS, SO THEY WILL NOT BE DAMAGED DURING DE-PANELIZATION.

- AL WRIGHT

Never Export English-Unit Gerber or Drill Files at 2:3 Decimal Resolution:

2:3 was a default setting back in the days when file size needed to be kept small, for moving data files on flexible disks of limited capacity. It is not appropriate for today’s dense designs.

Low resolution truncates off the last significant digit of your feature’s location. Particularly on designs which use 0.5mm (.0197”) surface mount devices, or large numbers of randomly-placed vias, the loss of this digit can cause a design which is perfect in its native CAD environment to yield from dozens to hundreds of Gerber spacing violations as your .0197” pad spacing is rounded to either .019” or .020” because of the missing digit.

Inadequate resolution can also play havoc with arc endpoints and polygon borders. Always use at least 2:5 inch, or 3:3 metric.

Design Check#6

Insufficient drill resolution rounding errors cause small shifts between holes and pads. These in turn become DRC / annular ring violations.

“ LOW RESOLUTION TRUNCATES OFF THE LAST SIGNIFICANT DIGIT OF FEATURE’S LOCATION.

- AL WRIGHT

Size Your Soldermask Openings Consistently:

Set up your padstack definitions so that all of your components use the same amount of oversizing. Doing so will eliminate a host of design rule errors that your fabricator will need to repair before manufacturing. Using (copper pad size + .004”) will enable your fabricator to avoid mask-on-pads, while still depositing mask material between pins of SMT components down to 0.5mm (.0197”) pitch, with no editing. (Example: .012” x .040” copper pad, .016” x .044” soldermask opening.)

Design Check#7

Notice the oversized openings for the vias, and the inconsistent sizing LXW of the rectangular pads. Some openings merge.

Now all mask openings are consistently and appropriately sized. Previously overlapping openings are now separated.

“ SETUP YOUR PAD STACK DEFINITIONS SO THAT ALL OF YOUR COMPONENTS USE THE SAME AMOUNT OF OVERSIZING.

- AL WRIGHT

Always Use Direct Connect for Vias:

Do not use thermal pads or location dots at via hole locations on internal plane layers. They are unnecessary, and in the case of tightly-spaced vias, multiple thermal pads may overlap to the extent that all of the tie connections may be removed from one or more vias. The result will be an open circuit (“starved thermal”) condition.

Your fabricator’s pre-production CAM department typically fills location dots before the artwork is plotted for manufacturing. Since the dots are not useful for production, and may actually create problems if they are not filled, it is best to omit them at the design stage.

Design Check#8

All vias in the violet plane areas are direct-connect, with no thermal pads and no small location dots. This is the correct appearance for vias connecting to planes.

“ DO NOT USE THERMAL PADS OR LOCATION DOTS AT VIA HOLE LOCATIONS ON INTERNAL PLANE LAYERS.

- AL WRIGHT

Size Your Component Hole Thermal Pads Appropriately:

As with vias, multiple, closely-spaced thermal pads on component holes can end up overlapping to cause an open. Another issue is that if the inner diameter is grossly oversized, there will be so much copper present that the pad will no longer serve its thermal function (that of maintaining an appropriately high temperature in the barrel of the hole during the solder cycle.) The inner diameter of your thermal pads should typically match the diameter of your external layer pads.

Design Check#9

Top and bottom thermals are correct. They will function better, and will be easier to read in a cross section than the one in the center.

“ THE INNER DIAMETER OF YOUR THERMAL PADS SHOULD TYPICALLY MATCH THE DIAMETER OF YOUR EXTERNAL LAYER PADS.

- AL WRIGHT

Allow Enough Clearance Between Unsupported PTHs and Adjacent Copper Features on Internal Layers:

As design rules become increasingly tighter, this DRC error is becoming more common. Multilayer PCBs need a minimum of .006” clearance from edge of trace to barrel of hole. There are many factors which affect dimensional accuracy of multilayers (drill runout, material movement, artwork scaling, multiple pinning setups) so design-in at least .006”, and more whenever possible.

Design Check#10

This hole is only .005” from the trace, and shows up as a min space violation. Hole to trace needs to be .006” min (more when possible).

“ MULTILAYER PCB’S NEED A MINIMUM OF .006” CLEARANCE FROM EDGE OF TRACE TO BARREL OF HOLE.

- AL WRIGHT

Remove Mask Openings for Vias in Dog-Bone BGA Areas:

The openings serve no purpose other than to allow solder bridge formation. Fabricators will ask for permission to remove openings. It is one of the most frequent reasons for delays in pre-production.

Avoid delays, and avoid rework, by removing the openings completely. If you don’t want mask in the via barrel, at least encroach the mask onto the pad, leaving only the barrel open.

Bonus: Design Check#11

Solder can bridge under BGA in top view, resulting in difficult repair. Bottom view vias are masked-over, so that this cannot occur.

Don’t Place Text on Multiple Layers in the Same Text Location, Even if the Characters are Identical:

Text which is present in both the copper and the silkscreen will not print correctly – it will be offset and uneven, with a double-struck appearance. Remove redundant text from the layers where you do not need it. Silkscreened text applied over soldermask typically offers the best legibility on the finished PCB.

Bonus: Design Check#12

Al WrightPCB Field Applications EngineerEpec Engineered Technologies

Al has been in the industry for over 32 years and has been with Epec for more than12 years. As field application engineer, he handles a wide range of responsibilities including reviewing PCB designs for manufacturability during the quoting and design stage, interacting with off-site manufacturing facilities to solve technical issues during production, and programming CNC machines for in-house projects, reworks, and modifications. Al’s technical expertise is essential to Epec’s engineering department and provides valuable insight when working with customers.

Previous to working at Epec, Al spent 20 years with CPC Incorporated, a medium-sized PCB manufacturer, learning hands-on about PCB processing before moving into front end engineering. Al brings impressive expertise to Epec and has worked with over 50,000 different PCB designs from his start in 1982 to the present day. He works with Epec’s team to get all designs right ahead of time so that products will be correct the first time.

Visit Our Website @ www.epectec.com

About The Author

Our knowledgeable staff has over 60 years of experience in the industry. We welcome the opportunity to put our skills to work for you! Please contact us with any questions or requests.

North American Headquarters174 Duchaine Blvd. New Bedford, MA 02745Toll Free: (888) 995-5171Tel: (508) 995-5171

Contact Us By Email:Sales [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Social CommunityJoin our Social Community and keep in touch with all our latest technology investments, current news, upcoming events, and promotions.

Visit Our Website @ www.epectec.com

Contact Us


Recommended