Date post: | 20-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
View: | 215 times |
Download: | 0 times |
B-Production in PYTHIAB-Production in PYTHIANick BrookNick Brook
University of BristolUniversity of Bristol
• Review of current useReview of current use
• ComparisonsComparisons
• B-asymmetriesB-asymmetries
• SummarySummary
Current status
• currently LHCb use PYTHIA 6.134
• tuned to UA5 data using multiple interaction model
• use CTEQ4L and running pT cut off with s
• b events are selected from min. bias events
• PYTHIA 6.157 is the latest release of PYTHIA
• PYTHIA 6.134 is 18 months old – latest version of
code has changes that effect b-production
code Sub-process 6.134Bb)
6.155Bb)
0 all sub processes
411.9 638.3
11 3.3 56.312 1.1 1.113 0.0 0.028 69.0 300.453 122.0 108.868 216.5 171.7
ffff ffff
ggff
gfgf ffgg gggg
gluon splitting source of b-production
“old” version of PYTHIA excitation process excluded
Comparison of “old” & “new” PYTHIA
Comparison of b-events from different sub-processes
Different sub-processes have different colour configurations
different properties of the hadronic final state and/or kinematic properties of B-mesons
Why haven’t we moved to later versions of PYTHIA?
Answer:
1. Problems with implementation of pTmin in
the QCD 2 2 process
2. Changes on heavy meson asymmetries in hadroproduction
address these issues
code Sub-process (i)% b-evts
(ii) % b-evts
11 10.0 9.112 0.2 0.213 0.0 0.028 50.0 51.053 10.8 10.268 28.6 29.4
ffff
ffff ggff gfgf ffgg gggg
Investigation of pTmin cut in PYTHIA
Method (i) – Generate events with pTmin > 10 GeV/c
Method (ii) - Generate events with pTmin > 1 GeV/c
discard events with pTmin > 10 GeV/c
process breakdown now consistent – previous problem cured
Investigation of pTmin cut in PYTHIA
- alternative breakdown of sub-processes:
1. g-splitting (no b-quark in hard process)
2. q-excitation (1 b-quark in hard process)
3. pair production (2 b-quarks in hard process)
Production
Process
(i)
%b-evts
(ii)
%b-evts
g-splitting 36.1 38.1q-
excitation52.9 51.3
pair prod. 11.0 10.6
Heavy meson asymmetries in hadroproduction
- essentially a leading quark effect – dependent on behaviour of (string) fragmentation
Can think of 3 contributions:
i. Low mass – colour singlet system forms a cluster that undergoes 2-body decay into 2 hadrons
ii. Very low mass – inv. mass of cluster too small for 2-body decay, cluster forced to collapse into a single hadron reflecting flavour content
iii. Beam remnant drag – hadron inherits energy & momentum from end-point of string
envisage (i) & (ii) not so important at LHC energies – play important role at fixed target energies
Comparison of PYTHIA with asymmetry data
E791, Phys. Lett. B371 (1996) 157.
Fixed target expt. 500 GeV beam on proton trgt.
Studied asymmetry as a function of xF & pT2
investigated charged D’s (D- is leading particle)
At these energies it is expected that LO diagrams (fusion processes) dominate production mechanism
NLL
NLLTF pxA
),( 2
Version of PYTHIA used by LHCb does have
hadroproduction asymmetries
asymmetries at fixed target energies are
overestimated
Asymmetries at LHCAsymmetries at LHC
generate with just the fusion processes(!) at moment
Differences between versions occur in the most forward region of LHCb
For pT> 5.0 the differences between
versions maybe less. Asymmetry at
the 2% level
… … try to convince you there are differences try to convince you there are differences
Different versions with the parameters reset in later version to earlier values
really need more stats. & correct processes !!!
SummarySummary• PYTHIA 6.134 (current LHCb version) does NOT generate the correct sub-processes and hence string configuration
• PYTHIA 6.134 DOES have heavy meson asymmetries in hadroproduction
• PYTHIA 6.134 overestimates asymmetries at fixed target energies
• Problems related to pTmin cut implementation in
later versions of PYTHIA seems cured
• Later versions of PYTHIA still reproduce same min. bias sample as earlier version
Move to latest version of PYTHIAMove to latest version of PYTHIA