U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT* L L * WASHINGTON, D.C 20410-6000
((I( CI (H 11(1 ICY IS VII OVt.II I
III %I ASCII
October 26, 2018
MEMORANDUM FOR: Teresa B. Payne, Acting Administrator, IIABC
THROUGH: Todd t”RIrdson General Deputy Assistant Secretary, R
FROM: Calv%ohnson, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Research,Evahf’ation and M9nitoring, RR
Adam-1ihler, Acting Director, Affordable Housing Research andTechnology Division, RRT
SUBJECT: Evaluation of Cost Figures Found in Department of Energy’sNODA Packages-Draft Results July 2018
This memorandum (memo) is in response to a request from HUD’s ManufacturedHousing Consensus Committee (MHCC) for the Office of Policy Development and Research(PD&R) to evaluate cost figures from the Department of Energy’s (DOE) Notice of DataAvailability (NODA)’; it describes PD&R’s review of the applicable data and supportingdocumentation, and specifically, does not object to DOE’s cost figures.
This memo is organized as follows:
Section I provides context relating to MHCC’s request for PD&R support in reviewingthe cost figures described within DOE’s NODA. Section II provides a historical perspective ofHUD and DOE’s roles in regulating energy conservation in manufactured housing. Section lITdescribes PD&R’s process of reviewing relevant data and contacting individuals knowledgeableof the subject matter. Section IV describes PD&R’s response to MHCC’s request for support inreviewing DOE’ s cost figures.
MHCC Request for PD&R Support
On September 11, 2018, MHCC met in Washington, D.C. to review DOE’s EnergyConservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Manufactured Housing, Notice ofData Availability Request for Information. As a result of their review and deliberation, MHCCmade the following request to PD&R:
Federal Register. ‘Energy Conservation Program: Energy Conservation Standards for Manufactured Housing; Notice of dataavailability; request for information’, 3 Aug. 201$. hitns://www.reeulations.gov/documeot?D=EERE-2009-BT-RC-002 1-0203
MHCC requests HUD ‘s PD&R to submit a document to the MHCC which includescomparable cost figures similar to EERE-2009-BT-BC-002] [NODA Packages-DraftRestttts July 2018] (Appendix A) by November 14, 2018.
II. Regulating Energy Conservation in Manufactured Housing
Section 413 of the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EISA)2 requires DOEto establish regulation standards for energy conservation in manufactured housing. Thisauthority specified that the established standards must be based on the most recent version of theInternational Energy Conservation Code (IECC) (including supplements), except in cases inwhich the IECC is found to not be cost-effective, or a more stringent standard would be morecost-effective. Based on the impact of the IECC on the purchase price of manufactured housingand on total life-cycle construction and operating costs.3
Prior to Section 413 of EISA, HUD regulated energy conservation for manufacturedhousing under 24 CFR 3280, Subpart F — Thermal Protection.4 This authority was establishedunder the Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards (MHCSS), which mandatesfederal standards for the design, construction, and installation of all manufactured (HUD-code)homes.
III. Reviewing Relevant Data and Contacting Individuals Knowledgeable of ManufacturedHoct sing
In response to MHCC’s request, PD&R staff conducted a review of relevant documentsand background materials ftom the Energy Conservation Standards for Manufactured Housingpublic comment webpage5 and contacted multiple individuals with expertise in manufacturedhousing related-energy matters.
The information collected in Appendix A was assembled by DOE with the assistance ofmembers of the Appliance Standards and Rulemaking Federal Advisory Committee (ASRAC)Manufactured Housing Working Group (Working Group), which was formed to provide DOEwith advice and recommendations related to the development of the Energy ConservationStandards for Manufactured Housing.
In July 2014, the Working Group was established and comprised of 22 stakeholders fromthe manufactured housing industry, which included one member from ASRAC and one DOErepresentative (see Appendix B). The Working Group convened six times between August andOctober 2014 to negotiate and successfully reach consensus on proposed federal standards forenergy conservation in manufactured housing. For the purposes of these meetings, DOE definedconsensus as at least a two-thirds “supermajority” in favor of a recommendation.
2 U.S. Government Publishing Oflice, ‘Public Law 110-140: Energy Independent and Security Act of 2007 (121 Stat. 492; Date:12/19/07),’ https://www.po.oo’/fcIsys/nk&PLAW- II Opubl I 40/pdf/PLAW- II Opubl I 40.pdI.
U.S. Department of Energy, ‘Energy Efflciency Standards for Manufactured Housing,’ https://www.cnergyeodcs. am/energycIticie1cu-%andards—rnanutIctttredlousi in.
U.S. Government Publishing Oflice. ‘24 CFR 3280— Manufactured Home Construction and Safety Standards, Subpart F —
Thermal Protection,’ hfl://ww.epo.aov/tdsys’pkCFR-20l 0-titIe24-vol5/pdf/CFR-20 I 0-title24-voI5-part328D-suhparrF.pdf.U.S. Regulations, ‘Energy Efficiency Standards for Manufactured Housing,’ httns://www.reuIations.gpv/doekci?t)EERE
2f)0)-l3T-RC-f)O2 I.
The elements of the energy conservation measures and cost data were developed withinput from the Working Group. Specifically, the cost data were derived from a survey of 20manufactured housing producers, ranging in size and location. Although the cost data wascollected in 2014, DOE’s analysis included multiplicative factors that accounted for inflation.
IV. Review of DOE Cost Figures
As stated, the basis for DOE’s cost figures was a survey of producers. PD&R staff wasnot able to recreate the survey conducted by the Working Group given the short timeframeprovided by MHCC. In order to conduct an independent survey, PD&R must abide by therequirements of the Office of Management and Budget’s (0MB) Paperwork Reduction Act(PRA), which requires multiple public notices and has a review period that lasts approximatelysix to nine months. However, PD&R believes that it is unlikely that the findings of anindependent survey would differ significantly from the cost data collected by the WorkingGroup. PD&R notes that the cost packages assume national average sales tax and property taxrates; however, changing these values to more localized parameters would minimally affect theanalysis. Consequently, PD&R does not object to the cost figures provided by DOE.
Although the request from MHCC was to analyze the cost figures used by DOE, PD&Rhas also reviewed the savings associated with the analysis associated with energy efficiencypackages. DOE used a life-cycle cost (LLC) analysis6 to determine the cost effectiveness of therequirements in the proposed rule and compared the results to the existing federal requirements(baseline) for manufactured homes found within MHCSS. DOE’s effort consisted of annualizingthe costs, including the added financing costs of the energy efficiency packages, and averagingthe savings based on the prevalence of different forms of heating within regions. The analysistelies on assumptions about the inflation rate of commodities, interest rates on various types ofloans, and the shares of home purchasers who finance their housing with either chattel or realestate loans, or cash.
Broadly speaking, PD&R does not object to the methodologies and assumptions usedwithin DOE’s LLC and annualized spreadsheets. However, PD&R notes two areas where DOEhas used a static assumption in place where more dynamic approaches would add value. Forone, the energy use predicted by each improvement package is fixed and does not appear to varyin response to the improvements themselves. Further review of the relevant behavioral literatureand modeling process used to produce the energy consumption rates would be necessary tovalidate this assumption. Additionally, the regional shares of various heating types are fixed.Given that the analysis suggests that homeowners with certain forms of heating will save moremoney as a result of the efficiency packages, it is worth investigating whether the share ofowners with each source would change over time in response to the rule.
In conclusion, PD&R concurs with the methodology and resulting cost figures. PD&Rremains willing to assist HUD’s Manufacture Housing Program as DOE continues its rulemakingprocess.
U.S. Department of Energy. ‘Manu_HousingNODA_LCc_20 8_07_27.xlsm.’ https://www.regulations.gov/docket?D=EERE2009-ET-BC-002 I
Appendix A — Manufactured Housing NODA Packages — Draft Results July 2018
-
--.
--
Fp3’
II
-I
Man
ufa
ctu
red
Hou
sing
NO
DA
Pac
kag
es—
Dra
ftR
esul
ts
July
2018
Des
crip
tion
ofP
ackag
es
PAC
KA
GE
1:
Thi
spa
ckag
ew
ould
max
imiz
eth
een
ergy
savi
ngs
ofa
man
ufac
ture
dho
me,
but
excl
ude
enve
lope
and
duct
seal
ing
tom
axim
ize
ener
gysa
ving
s.
PAC
KA
GE
2:
Thi
spa
ckag
ew
ould
max
imiz
eth
een
ergy
savi
ngs
ofa
man
ufac
ture
dho
me,
but
allo
wen
velo
pean
ddu
ctse
alin
gto
max
imiz
een
ergy
savi
ngs.
Met
hod:
•E
nerg
ysa
ving
sis
max
imiz
edby
min
imiz
ing
Uo
ofth
eho
me.
•P
acka
ge1
and
2ar
ecr
eate
dfo
rin
crem
enta
lpr
ice
targ
ets
of$5
00,
$100
0,an
d$1
500.
•In
crem
enta
lco
sts
and
savi
ngs
calc
ulat
ions
are
base
don
met
hods
and
data
pre
sente
din
the
2016
NO
PR.
U.s
.D
EP
AR
TM
EN
TO
FE
E2
Ren
ewab
leEn
ergy
Pac
kag
e1
(no
seal
ing):
HU
DC
Z1
I-hI
D(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*
N/A
(R-1
l)N
/A(R
-22)
N/A
(R-2
2)
N/A
(1.0
8)
N/A
(0.7
0)
0.11
6
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
onIn
crem
enta
lC
osts
and
Savi
ngs
Res
ults
(201
7$)
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
t$5
00C
ost
$100
0C
ost
$1500
Cos
tP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geR
-13
R-1
lR
-13
$68.
27$0
.00
$68.
27R
-30
R-2
2R
-22
$451
.74
$0.0
0$0
.00
R-1
9R
-19
R-1
9-$
136.
44-$
136.
44-$
136.
441.
080.
50.
35$0
.00
$1,0
48.4
3$1
,495
.84
0.7
0.6
0,33
0.10
710.
0937
0.08
54I
IE
nvel
ope
Lea
kage
(AC
H)
Duc
tL
eaka
ge(c
fm25
/100
ftA
2CF
A)
Dom
esti
cH
W
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
sThe
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
spre
sente
dpr
ovid
eone
pote
ntia
lpa
thto
com
ply
wit
hth
eH
UD
Uo
requ
irem
ent.
ener
gy
mci
ency
&3
EN
ER
GY
Ren
ewab
Te
Ene
rgy
N/A
(s)
N/A
(12)
R-3
N/A
(s)
N/A
(12)
R-3
N/A
(8)
N/A
(12)
R-3
$0.0
0
$o.0
0
$55.
18
$438
.76
$105
.85
6.6
$103
.48
6.7
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$967
.17
$157
.88
9-7
$154
.42
9.8
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$1,4
82.8
6
$270
.22
8.6
$264
.45
8.7
NO
PRC
LIM
ATE
ZON
E1—
HU
DZ
one
1
HO
UST
ON
,TX
Com
pone
ntW
all
Cei
ling
Flo
or
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Pack
ag
e1
(no
sealin
g):
HU
DC
Z1
NO
PRC
LIM
ATE
ZO
NE
2—H
UD
Zon
e1
ISin
gle
Secti
on
[cm
ponent
Wal
lC
eilin
gF
loor
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
onIn
crem
enta
lC
osts
and
Savi
ngs
Res
ults
(201
7$)
HU
D$5
00C
ost
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
t(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*P
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geN
/AfR
-il)
R-1
3R
-1l
R-1
3$6
8.27
$0.0
0$6
8.27
N/A
(R-2
2)R
-30
R-2
2R
-22
$451
.74
$0.0
0$0
.00
N/A
(R-2
2)R
-19
R-1
9R
-19
-$13
6.44
-$13
6.44
-$13
6.44
N/A
(1.0
8)1.
080.
50.
35$0
.00
$104
8.43
$1,4
95.8
4N
/A(0
.70)
0.7
0.6
0.33
0.11
60.
1071
0.09
370.
0854
II
8N
/A(8
)N
/A(8
)N
/A(8
)$0
.00
$0.0
0
N/A
(12)
N/A
(12)
N/A
(12)
N/A
(12)
$0.0
0$0
.00
Non
eR
-3R
-3R
-3$5
5.18
$55.
18
$438
.76
$967
.17
$131
.29
$181
.61
5.5
8.6
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$1,4
82.8
6
$287
.31
8.1
Env
elop
eL
eaka
ge(A
CH
)
Duc
tL
eaka
ge(c
fm25
/100
ftA
2C
PA)
Dom
esti
cH
W
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
CAEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
eso
urce)
______________
_____________________________________________
*The
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
sp
rese
nte
dpr
ovid
eon
epo
tent
ial
path
toco
mpl
yw
ith
the
HU
DU
ore
quir
emen
t.$128
.33
$177
.59
$281
.11
5.5
8.6
8.2
4.
riie
vviu
ieiz
iieiy
y
Pac
kag
e1
(no
seal
ing):
HU
DC
Z2
HU
D(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*
N)A
(R-1
1)N
/A(R
-22)
N/A
(R49
)
N/A
(0.5
)
N/A
(0.6
)0.
096
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
on
$500
Cos
tP
acka
geR
-13
R-2
2
R-1
3
0.35
0.33
0.09
20
N/A
(8)
N/A
(12)
R-3
Incr
emen
tal
Cos
tsan
dS
avin
gsR
esul
ts(2
017$
)
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
tP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geR
-13
R-1
9$6
8.27
$68.
27$6
74.1
2R
-22
R-2
2$0
.00
$0.0
0$0
.00
R-2
2R
-22
-$81
.95
$136
.44
$136
.44
$447
.41
$627
.99
0.31
0.25
0.08
19
N/A
(8)
0.31
0.25
0.07
28
N/A
(8)
$0.0
0
$627
.99
$0.0
0E
nvel
ope
Lea
kage
(AC
H)
Duc
tL
eaka
ge(d
m25
1100
ftA2
CFA
)D
omes
tic
HW
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
l Cos
t
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
Sim
ple
Payb
ack
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
*The
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
spr
esen
ted
prov
ide
one
pote
ntia
lpa
thto
com
ply
wit
hth
eH
UD
Uo
requ
irem
ent.
nerg
yL
ilic
lenc
y&
5E
NE
RG
YR
enew
able
Ene
rgy
N/A
(12)
R-3
N/A
(12)
R-3
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$488
.92
$140
.63
5.4
$137
.47
5.5
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$887
.88
$167
.33
8.3
$163
.48
8.4
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$1,4
93.7
3
$277
.20
8.7
$270
.44
8.7
NO
PRCL
IMA
TEZO
NE
3—H
UD
Zon
e2
(Sin
gle
Sec
tio
n
ME
MPH
IS, T
N
Com
pone
ntW
all
Cei
ling
Floo
r
Win
dow
U-f
acto
rW
indo
wSH
GC
Pac
kage
1(n
ose
alin
g):
HU
DCZ
3N
OPR
CLI
MA
TEZ
ON
E4—
HU
DZ
one
3
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
onIn
crem
enta
lC
osts
and
Sav
ings
Res
ults
(201
7$)
HU
D$5
00C
ost
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
t(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*P
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geN
/AfR
-13)
R-2
1R
-21
R-2
1$7
46.1
6$7
46.1
6$7
46.1
6N
/AfR
-30)
R-2
2R
-22
R-3
0-$
451.
74-$
451.
74$0
.00
N/A
fR-2
2)R
-22
R-3
0R
-30
$0.0
0$4
06.5
2$4
06.5
2N
/A(0
.35)
0.32
0.31
0.31
$86.
24$1
80.5
7$1
80.5
7N
/A(0
.33)
0.33
0.25
0.25
Com
pone
ntW
all
Cei
ling
Floo
r
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
0.07
9
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
0.07
13
N/A
(8)
N/A
(12)
R-3
0.06
59
N/A
(s)
N/A
(12)
R-3
0.06
10
N/A
(s)
N/A
(12)
R-3
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$435
.85
$138
.79
5.9
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$936
.70
$153
.87
11.2
$0.0
0
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$1,3
88.4
4
$233
.40
10.8
Env
elop
eL
eaka
ge(A
CH)
Duc
tL
eaka
gefc
fmZ
5/10
0ftA
2CF
A)
Dom
esti
cH
W
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
l Cos
t
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
CAEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
The
ener
gyef
ficie
ncy
mea
sure
spre
sente
dpr
ovid
eone
po
ten
tial
pat
hto
com
ply
wit
hth
eH
UD
Uo
requir
emen
t.$129
.14
$143
.54
$217
.96
6.0
11.3
11.0
6i
enew
aoie
riner
gy
Pac
kag
e2
(wit
hse
alin
g):
HU
DC
Z1
HU
D(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
tN
/A(R
-11)
N/A
(R-2
2)N
/A(R
-22)
N/A
(1.0
$)
N/A
(0.7
0)0.
116
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
on
$500
Cos
tP
acka
geR
-13
R-2
2R
-19
1.08 0.7
0.11
20
5 4 R-3
Incr
emen
tal
Cos
tsan
dSa
ving
sR
esul
ts(2
017$
)
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
tP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geR
-13
R-1
3$6
8.27
$68.
27$6
8.27
R-2
2R
-22
$0.0
0$0
.00
$0.0
0R
-30
R49
-$13
6.44
$406
.52
-$13
6.44
1.08
0.5
$0.0
0$0
.00
$1,0
48.4
30.
70.
60.
1048
0.09
09I
IE
nvel
ope
Lea
kage
(AC
H)
Duc
tL
eaka
ge(c
fm25
/100
ftA
2C
FA)
Dom
esti
cH
W
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
fAEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
tlhe
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
sp
rese
nte
dpr
ovid
eon
epo
tent
ial
path
toco
mpl
yw
ith
the
HU
DU
ore
quir
emen
t.T
hepa
ckag
eas
sum
esd
uct
seal
ing
requir
emen
tsw
ould
requ
ire
foll
owin
gpr
escr
ipti
veduct
seal
ing
met
ho
ds
toac
hiev
eth
edu
ctle
akag
enu
mer
ical
perf
orm
ance
valu
e,w
ith
ou
tnee
din
gto
perf
orm
test
ing.
5 4 R-3
5 4 R-3
$253
.25
$209
.70*
$55.
18
$450
.57
$186
.95
3.9
$182
.81
3.9
$253
.85
$209
.701
$55.
18
$993
.53
$188
.70
8.6
$184
.50
8.7
$253
.85
$2o9
.7o1
$55.
18
$1,4
99.0
0
$301
.86
8.0
$295
.23
8.1
U.S
.D
EP
AR
TM
EN
TO
FE
nerg
yE
ffic
ienc
y&
7E
NE
RG
YR
enew
able
Ene
rgy
NO
PRC
LIM
ATE
ZON
E1—
HU
DZ
one
1IS
ing
leS
ecti
on
HO
UST
ON
,TX
Com
ponen
tW
all
Cei
ling
Floo
r
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Pac
kage
2(w
ith
seal
ing):
HU
DC
Z1
HU
D(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*
N/A
fR-l
i)N
/A(R
-22)
N/A
fR-2
2)
N/A
(1.0
$)
N/A
(0.7
0)0.
116
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
on
$500
Cos
tP
acka
ge
R-1
3
R-2
2R
-19
1.0$ 0.7
0.11
20
5 4 R-3
Incr
emen
tal
Cos
tsan
dS
avin
gsR
esul
ts(2
017$
)
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
tP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geR
-13
R-1
3$6
8.27
$68.
27$6
8.27
R-2
2R
-22
$0.0
0$0
.00
$0.0
0R
-30
R-1
9-$
136.
44$4
06.5
2-$
136.
441.
080.
5$0
.00
$0.0
0$1
,048
.43
0.7
0.6
0.10
480.
0909
II
Env
elop
eL
eaka
ge(A
CH
)
Duc
tL
eaka
ge(c
fmZ
5/10
0ft
A2
CEA
)D
omes
tic
HW
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
l Cos
t
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEQ
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
*The
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
spr
esen
ted
prov
ide
one
pote
ntia
lpa
thto
com
ply
wit
hth
eH
UD
Uo
requ
irem
ent.
1:T
hepa
ckag
eas
sum
esdu
ctse
alin
gre
quir
emen
tsw
ould
requ
ire
foll
owin
gpr
escr
ipti
vedu
ctse
alin
gm
etho
dsto
achi
eve
the
duct
leak
age
num
eric
alpe
rfor
man
ceva
lue,
wit
hout
need
ing
tope
rfor
mte
stin
g.
5 4 R-3
5 4 R-3
$253
.85
$2
09
.70
t
$55.
18
$450
.57
$231
.25
3.2
$226
.04
3.3
$253
.85
$209
.70*
$55.
18
$993
.53
$238
.10
7.0
$232
.71
7.0
$253
.85
$2o9.7
0t
$55.
18
$1,4
99.0
0
$365
.64
6.7
$357
.48
6.8
U.S
.D
EP
AR
TM
EN
TO
FE
nerg
yE
ffic
ienc
y&
8E
NE
RG
YR
enew
able
Ene
rgy
NO
PRC
UM
ATE
ZON
E2—
HU
DCZ
1IS
ingle
Sec
tio
n
JAC
KSO
N,M
S
Com
pone
ntW
all
Cei
ling
Floo
r
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Pac
kag
e2
(wit
hse
alin
g):
HU
DC
Z2
NO
PRC
LIM
ATE
ZON
E3—
HU
DZ
one
2I S
ingle
Sec
tio
nf
ME
MPH
IS, T
N
Com
po
nen
tW
all
Cei
ling
Flo
or
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
onIn
crem
enta
lC
osts
and
Sav
ings
Res
ults
(201
7$)
HU
D$
50
0C
ost
$1
00
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$
10
00
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
t(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*P
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geN
/A(R
-11)
R4
3R
-19
R-2
1$6
8.27
$674
.12
$814
.43
N/A
(R-2
2)R
-22
R-2
2R
-22
$0.0
0$0
.00
$0.0
0N
/A(R
-19)
R-1
9R
-19
R-2
2$0
.00
$0.0
0$1
36.4
4N
/A(0
.5)
0.5
0.5
0.5
$0.0
0so
.oo
$0.0
0N
/A(0
.6)
0.6
0.6
0.6
0.09
60.
0909
0.08
180.
0779
Env
elop
eL
eaka
ge(A
CH
)
Duc
tL
eaka
gefc
fm25
/100
ft’2
Cf A
)D
omes
tic
HW
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
The
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
spre
sente
dpr
ovid
eon
epo
tent
ial
path
toco
mpl
yw
ith
the
HU
DU
ore
quir
emen
t.*
The
pack
age
assu
mes
duct
seal
ing
requir
emen
tsw
ould
requir
efo
llow
ing
pres
crip
tive
duct
seal
ing
met
ho
ds
toac
hiev
eth
edu
ctle
akag
enu
mer
ical
perf
orm
ance
valu
e,w
ith
ou
tnee
din
gto
perf
orm
test
ing.
U.S
.D
EP
AR
TM
EN
TO
FE
nerg
yE
ffic
ienc
y&
9E
NE
RG
YR
enew
able
Ene
rgy
8
N/A
(12)
Non
e
5
N/A
(12)
R-3
5
N/A
(12)
R-3
S 4 R-3
$253
.$5
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$377
.31
$200
.51
3.2
$195
.03
3.3
$253
.85
$0.0
0
$55.
18
$983
.15
$310
.78
5.5
$302
.38
5.5
$253
.85
$209
.701
$55.
18
$1,4
69.6
0
$382
.11
6.6
$371
.93
6.6
Pac
kag
e2
(wit
hse
alin
g):
HU
DC
Z3
NO
PRC
LIM
AT
EZ
ON
E4—
HU
DZ
one3
ISin
gle
Sec
tion
CH
ICA
GO
, IL
Com
pone
ntW
all
Cei
ling
floo
r
Win
dow
U-f
acto
r
Win
dow
SHG
C
Eff
icie
ncy
Mea
sure
sD
escr
ipti
onIn
crem
enta
lC
osts
and
Savi
ngs
Res
ults
(201
7$)
HU
D$5
00C
ost
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
t(C
urre
ntP
ract
ice)
*P
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geP
acka
geN
/A(R
-13)
R-2
1R
-21
R-2
1$7
46.1
6$7
46.1
6$7
46.1
6N
/A(R
-30)
R-2
2R
-22
R-2
2-$
451.
74-$
451.
74-$
451.
74N
/A(R
-22)
R-2
2R
-22
R-3
8$0
.00
$0.0
0$5
78.3
0N
/A(0
.35)
0.49
0.31
0.32
-$34
7.68
$180
.57
$86.
24N
/A(0
.33)
0.71
0.25
0.33
0.07
90.
0775
0.07
100.
0647
Env
elop
eL
eaka
ge(A
CH
)
Duc
tLea
kage
(cfm
25/1
00ftA
2CF
A)
Dom
esti
cH
W
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
l Cos
t
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Savi
ngs
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
(AEO
Hig
hO
ilan
dG
asR
esou
rce)
*The
ener
gyef
fici
ency
mea
sure
spr
esen
ted
prov
ide
one
pote
ntia
lpa
thto
com
ply
with
the
HU
DU
ore
quir
emen
t.*
The
pack
age
assu
mes
duct
seal
ing
requ
irem
ents
wou
ldre
quir
efo
llow
ing
pres
crip
tive
duct
seal
ing
met
hods
toac
hiev
eth
edu
ctle
akag
enu
mer
ical
perf
orm
ance
valu
e,w
itho
utne
edin
gto
perf
orm
test
ing.
bn
erg
yb
flic
ien
cy&
10E
NE
RG
YR
enew
able
Ener
gy
$
N/A
(12)
Non
e
5 4 R-3
5 4 R-3
5 4 R-3
$253
.85
$209
.70*
$55.
18
$465
.47
$350
.43
2.8
$321
.28
2.8
$253
.85
$209
.70*
$55.
18
$993
.73
$424
.80
4.3
$395
.94
4.4
$253
.85
$209
.70*
$55.
18
$1,4
77.6
9
$441
.14
6.2
$410
.48
6.3
Dra
ftR
esult
sS
um
mar
y
DO
EC
ZI
—
Ho
ust
on
(HU
DC
ZI)
$438.7
6
$105
.85
$7
2.1
8
6.6
$6
45
.33
$4,9
53
$9
67
.1
7
$1
57
.88
$83.
659.
7
$636
.96
$10,
862
$1,4
82.8
6
$270
.22
$156
.42
8.6
$1,2
70.1
0
$1
6,5
69
$450
.57
$186
.95
$152
.38
3.9
$1,4
78.1
5
$5,0
86
$993
.53
$188
.70
$112
.45
8.6
$930
.01
$11,
155
$1,4
99.0
0
$301
.86
$1
86
.81
8.0
$1,5
82.2
5
$16,
746
$61,4
64
$134
,786
$2
05
,60
6$
63
,11
8$
13
8,4
27
$207
,803
$438.7
6$
96
7.1
7$
1,4
82
.86
$4
50
.57
$993
.53
$1
,49
9.0
0$131.2
9$
18
1.6
1$287.3
1$2
31.2
5$
23
8.1
0$
36
5.6
4
DO
EC
Z2—
$97.
61$1
07.3
8$1
73.5
1$1
96.6
7$1
61.8
5$2
50.6
0
$910
.13
$883
.84
$1,4
47.9
0$1
,939
.68
$1,4
44.6
6$2
,246
.53
$3,0
65$6
,721
$10,
252
$3,1
47$6
,902
$10,
361
$3
8,0
29
$8
3,3
97
$1
27
,21
7$39,0
54
$8
5,6
50
$128
,575
$4
88
.9
2$
88
7.8
8$
1,4
93
.7
3$
37
7.3
1$
98
3.1
5$
1,4
69
.6
0
$1
40
.63
$167
.33
$277.2
0$
20
0.5
1$
31
0.7
8$3
82.1
1
DO
EC
Z3
—$103.11
$99.19
$1
62
.5
6$171.55
$2
35
.3
3$269.32
$955.2
6$
81
7.2
9$1
,328
.59
$1,6
93.2
5$2
,209
.21
$2,4
44.2
6
$2,6
39$
4,7
74
$7,9
83$2
,039
$5,2
81$7
,856
$500
Cos
t.
$100
0C
ost
$150
0C
ost
$500
Cos
t$1
000
Cos
t$1
500
Cos
tP
ack
agei
pac
kag
e1
Pac
kage
1P
acka
ge2
Pac
kage
2P
acka
ge2
Totà
lln
crer
nen
tal
Cos
tA
vera
geA
nnua
lE
nerg
yB
illS
avin
gsA
vera
geA
nnua
lC
ash
Flo
wS
impl
eP
ayba
ckP
erio
dLC
CS
avin
gsA
nnua
lize
dC
osts
at7%
DR
(in00
0s,
2016
$) Costs
at7
%D
R(in
COO
s,2
O1
6$
_________________________________________________________
______________________
Töt
àlIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Cas
hF
low
*
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
CCC
Sav
ings
Ann
uali
zed
Cos
tsat
7%D
R(i
n00
0s,
2016
$)
NPV
Cos
tsat
7%D
R(i
n00
0s,
2016
$)
__
__
__
__
__
________________________________________________________________________________
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Cas
hFl
ow*
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
ICC
Sav
ings
Ann
uali
zed
Cos
tsat
7%D
R-t
in00
0s,
2016
$)
NPV
Cos
tsat
7%D
Rfi
n00
0s,
2016
$)
__
__
__
__
__
_______________________________________________________
______________________
Tot
alIn
crem
enta
lC
ost
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Ene
rgy
Bill
Sav
ings
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Cas
hFI
ow*
Sim
ple
Pay
back
Per
iod
LC
CS
avin
gs
Ann
uali
zed
Cos
tsat
7%D
R(i
n00
0s,
2016
$)N
PVC
osts
at7%
DR
(in
000s,
2O
16$)
_____
anaI
Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Cas
hF
low
=A
vera
geA
nnua
lE
nerg
yB
illS
avin
gs—
(Ave
rage
Ann
ual
Mort
gag
eP
aym
ents
+A
vera
geA
nnua
lP
rop
erty
Tax
Pay
men
ts)
Not
eM
ost
bu
yer
sfi
nanc
eth
ehom
e,m
eanin
gth
ein
crea
sed
upfr
ont
cost
(do
wn
pay
men
t)is
10%
to20
%of
the
tota
lin
crem
enta
lco
st**
Nat
iona
l(S
S+M
S)re
sult
sco
rres
pond
toal
tsi
ng
le-s
ecti
on
and
mu
lti-
sect
ion
MH
affe
cted
byth
est
andar
ds.
All
oth
erre
sult
sar
efo
rsi
ngle
-sec
tion
only
.
DO
EC
Z4—
Ch
icag
o
(HU
DC
Z3)
$32,7
47
$4
35
.85
$1
38
.79
$105.3
4
5.9
$975.6
1
$4,1
15
$51,
063
$59,
240
$936
.70
$153
.87
$81.
99
11.2
$6
09
.91
$8,8
00
$9
9,0
62
$1
,38
8.4
4$233.4
0
$1
26
.84
10.8
$9
59
.35
$1
2,9
86
$25,
302
$4
65
.47
$350
.43
$3
14
.71
2.8
$3
,11
3.9
4
$4,3
94
$54,
521
$6
5,5
29
- $99
3.7
3
$4
24
.80
$3
48
.54
4.3
$3
,34
2.4
3
$9,3
30
$97,
485
$1,4
77.6
9
$4
41
.14
$327
.73
6.2
$3,0
04.7
1
$1
3,8
08
$109,2
00
$161,1
40
$64
$796
$146
$1,8
16
$224
$2,7
80
$115
,779
$171
,350
$60
$743
$145
$1
,80
2
$224
$2,7
82rg
yE
ffic
ienc
y&
,ew
abIe
Ene
rgy
Appendix B - ASRAC Manufactured Housing Working Group Membership
Working GroupMember Company
Joseph Hagerman Department of EnergyJohn Caskey ASRAC, National Electrical Manufacturers AssociationKeith Dennis National Rural Electrical Cooperative AssociationIshbel Dickens National Manufactured Home Owners Association (NMHOA)Scott Drake East Kentucky Power CooperativeStacey Epperson Next Step NetworkMark Ezzo Clayton Homes, Inc.Richard Hanger Housing Technology and StandardsBert Kessler Palm Harbor Homes, Inc.Eric Lacey Responsible Energy Codes AllianceEmanuel Levy Systems Building Research AllianceMichael Lubliner Washington State University Extension Energy ProgramRob Luter Lippert Components, Inc.Richard Potts Virginia Department of Housing and Community DevelopmentRobin Roy Natural Resources Defense CouncilManuel Santana Cavco IndustriesPeter Schneider Efficiency VermontLois Starkey Manufactured Housing InstituteDavid Tompos NTA, Inc.Lowell Ungar American Council for an Energy-Efficient EconomyMichael Wade Cavalier Home BuildersMark Weiss Manufactured Housing Association for Regulatory Reform