+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BA107-12

BA107-12

Date post: 03-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: hamis-rabiam-magunda
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 18

Transcript
  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    1/18

    Corporate Social

    Responsibility and

    Business EthicsUBGA 107: Week 12

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    2/18

    Todays Agenda

    Administrative Matters (return exams)

    Only scantron is returned to you. Blue books are available to

    be viewed in Professor Gerlachs office only.

    Grade distribution adjustment? Attendance sheet to be returned to me during class

    Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics

    What are CSR and Ethics?

    How are ethical questions analyzed

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    3/18

    Review

    Corporate Governance U.S. v. Germany (Japan) the ways in which rights and responsibilities are shared

    between the various corporate participants (In the US,

    especially the management and the shareholders). The Facts

    WorldComs meteoritic rise

    The Scandal

    Financial Manipulations WorldComs incentive to commit fraud Arthur Andersens incentive to look away

    Key: Misalignment of Incentives

    http://www.investorwords.com/2931/management.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/4527/shareholders.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/4527/shareholders.htmlhttp://www.investorwords.com/2931/management.html
  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    4/18

    Definitions

    What is Corporate Social Responsibility? Corporate-wide activities carried out to improve a companys

    image vis--vis various stakeholder groups

    Examples Corporate Philanthropy, Environmental Policies, Worker Rights

    Policies, etc.

    What is business ethics? Refers to actions by individuals and/or groups within

    organizations Examples

    Embezzlement, Sexual Harassment

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    5/18

    Discussion Question #1

    Discuss the reading in the context of thecorporate social responsibility of McWane andAcipco, providing some specific examples

    Corporate Philanthropy

    Environmental Policies

    Workers Rights Policies

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    6/18

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    7/18

    Environmental Policies

    McWanes environmental records are abysmal Persistent defiance of laws protecting workers and surrounding

    communities from toxic pollution Discharged arsenic, copper and thallium into the air (Alabama) Workers exposed to exceptionally high levels of silica Failure to provide respirator, causing severe kidney failure due to arsenic

    poisoning 8.5 mil-long slick in the Delaware River Flushing thousands of gallons of polluted water through the storm drain

    (Birmingham)

    Repeated failure to stop production to repair broken/ineffectivepollution control

    Equipment tampered with so as not to shut down automaticallywhen pollution controls fail

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    8/18

    Workers Rights Policies

    A dangerous business Workers who protest dangerous work conditions bull-eyed for termination Supervisors refused to wait a few hours for federal safety inspectors to arrive

    before restarting a conveyor belt that had crushed a man to death Line workers who fail to make daily quotas get disciplinary actions

    Discipline used to suppress union unrest and injury claims Supervisors urged to discipline injured workers (to punish workers for

    reporting injuries) Safety directors request for more safety equipment and assistant ignored. Blatant refusal to adhere to federal safety rules on weight-lifting limits Company officials lie to OSHA regarding safety issues (elevator shaft example) OSHA: respirator program totally ineffective 404 OSHA violations 1995-2003

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    9/18

    Contract with Acipco

    The only time you can get a job at Acipco is ifsomebody retires or dies.

    Workers take yoga glasses in a modern health club with

    the latest in weight-training equipment and a spring-loaded floor for aerobics

    Workers get cash bonuses if they keep their cholesteroldown

    Spent millions of dollars to install air-conditionedbooths in the hottest parts of the plant

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    10/18

    McWane vs. Acipco

    McWane Business Model

    Profit at the expense of workersafety/environmental cleanliness.

    Cost savings from ignoring safety/environmentalstandards much greater than fines

    Acipco Business Model

    If workers had a genuine stake they would workharder and smarter and produce more

    Instituted profit-sharing for all employees

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    11/18

    Ethical Choices

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    12/18

    The Three Models of Ethical

    Analyses Utilitarian

    Comparing benefits and costs

    Action is ethical if net benefits exceed net costs

    But difficult to measure some human and social costs. Majority may

    disregard rights of minority Rights

    Respecting entitlements

    Basic Human rights are respected

    Difficult to balance conflicting rights

    Justice Distributing fair shares

    Benefits and costs are fairly distributed

    Difficult to measure benefits and costs. Lack of agreement on fair shares

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    13/18

    Discussion Question #2

    Provide Robert Restor, a former plant managerat McWane, with advice on the ethical choiceshe could have made while at McWane based on

    the three ethical models discussed in class

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    14/18

    Mr. Resters Ethical Dilemma

    Over 24 years, Mr. Rester became numb to theconstant body count, brushed hands and feet,disfiguring lacerations, burns from molten iron,amputations.

    His sole focus, was finding a fresh body to keepproduction rolling.

    For a McWane manager, taking time for safety orenvironmental problem holds few attractions. It means

    slowing production to fix equipment. It means moresafety training, less time to make pipe. The McWane dictum: TIME = PIPE, PIPE =

    MONEY

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    15/18

    Advice to Mr. Rester

    Utilitarian

    Rights

    Justice

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    16/18

    News Updates

    U.S. Brings New Set of Charges Against Pipe Manufacturer

    May 26, 2004 M cWane Inc., a major pipe maker and one of the nation's most persistent

    violators of workplace safety and environmental laws, faced a new round ofcriminal charges last night after a federal grand jury in the company'shometown, Birmingham, Ala., issued a 25-count indictment alleging illegaldumping and other environmental crimes.

    The indictment charges that senior McWane managers, including CharlesRobison, the corporation's vice president for environmental affairs, conspiredto dump huge quantities of polluted wastewater into a creek that runs throughMcWane's oldest foundry, the McWane Cast Iron Pipe Company, on theoutskirts of downtown Birmingham.

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    17/18

    News Update

    Plea Agreement Is Reached in Pipe Case

    May 27, 2004

    A day after announcing a second indictment against McWane Inc., federalprosecutors disclosed Wednesday that a longtime McWane manager had

    agreed to cooperate with their investigation into environmental and safetyviolations at McWane, one of the nation's largest manufacturers of cast ironwater and sewer pipe.

    The manager, Donald Harbin, 58, has agreed to plead guilty to a single felony,conspiracy to violate environmental laws at the McWane foundry inBirmingham, Ala., where prosecutors charged this week that huge quantities ofpolluted wastewater had been illegally and routinely dumped into a creek.

    Mr. Harbin is the first McWane employee to strike a plea agreement withprosecutors and the first to acknowledge criminal conduct. The maximumsentence is five years in prison and a $250,000 fine , but Mr. Harbin is almostcertain to receive a much lighter sentence for agreeing to cooperate. In all, 10McWane managers have been charged with crimes in Alabama and New Jersey.

  • 7/28/2019 BA107-12

    18/18

    Key Take Away

    Sometimes, there are truly difficult ethical questions: From a pro-life perspective, if a pregnant mothers life is in danger, and

    you have to sacrifice the unborn childs life, or condemn the mother tocertain death, whose life do you choose?

    But many of the so-calledethical questions

    in the businessworld arise from the choice between profit and socially desirable

    policy considerations. Here, the ethical choice is not inherently difficult to discern, but often

    financial considerations push ethically desirable concerns to thebackground Here, the cost of compliance > cost of fines

    But the McWane Acipco contrast highlights the fact that ethicaldecisions do not necessarily result in financial ruin.

    In Mr. Resters example, the opposing forces were his self-interest and hisconscience.


Recommended