Date post: | 31-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | channing-wells |
View: | 17 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Lightning Presentation
Quality Assurance of Family Planning Services in Rural Pakistan under the Suraj Social Franchise model
Authors: Xaher Gul, Komal Daredia, Saeed Qureshi, Asma Balal, Shahida Naqvi
Background InformationMSS Service Delivery Network
Field Worker
126 Providers
12Sindh
42KPK
72Punja
b
3Source: The Basics of Quality Assurance in Social Franchising, Quality Assurance Framework Summary, UCSF Global Health Sciences, The Global Health Group
Framework for Quality Assurance in SF
Recruitment
Feedback Training
Monitoring of Client
Experience
Monitoring of Clinical &
NonClinical quality
Background InformationSelection Criteria for Suraj (Sun) Providers
Good Reputatio
n in communi
ty
Willing to maintain
Suraj Records
Adequate Infrastructur
e
Private Qualified Providers
Located in non urban, low income
area
Experienced in RH Service Delivery
Accessible and willing for training
Willing to abide by
Suraj TOR’s
Open to periodical audits and QA visits
Background Information
Project Office
Structure for QA visits
Region Office
Annually
Quarterly
Annually
• MSI QTA
• Client Exit Interview (Third Party)
MethodologyQuality Assurance Scan Indicators
Clinical Administratio
n
(44 Indicators)
Knowledge Assessment
(15 Indicators)
Counseling
(64 Indicators)
Procedure Competency
under Observation
(115 Indicators)
Infection Prevention
(38 Indicators)
Emergency Preparedness
(67 Indicators)
Supplies
(24 Indicators)
Source: MSS QA scan is adopted from MSI QTA Check list and modified from WHO FP Standards.
367Indicators
367 Indicators
Accessed under 7 Categories
Score Range 0-2
Score Achieved in each category ÷
Number of Indicators Accessed
Total Score in all Categories ÷ Number
of Categories Accessed
Percentage
Methodology
85% & > 85
%
70% - 84%
50% to
70%
< 50%
Overall Score
Excellent Good Average Weak / Non Compliant
Red Flag Issue
Non Compliance Issue
Training Need Assessment
Findings (Dec 12 – Jun 14)
Perceived Quality
99.9% - willing to
recommend the health facility to others.
99.9% - visit the facility again in
the future.
100% - clients satisfied
1/5 of all RHF clients cite provider reputation as the main reason for choosing SURAJ clinics for FP services.
Waiting
Time 15 minutes
99.9% clients expectation met
or even exceeding
Findings (Dec 12 – Jun 14)
Average internal QA scores of Suraj Clinics
*Marie Stopes International conducts QTA assessment on an yearly basis
99.25Average QTA* Score
[8 Providers randomly selected, December 2013]
Way forwardElectronic QA Scans with Touch Tablets