Safety of Out of Bed Ac/vity and Ambula/on in Pa/ents with Pulmonary Artery Catheters A. Pawlik, PT; C. Esbrook, OTR/L; S. Harrison, PT; C. Steinberg, OTR/L, V. Jeevanandam, MD
University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
Background
Aims
The Intervention
Lessons Learned
Due to the absence of literature suppor2ng or refu2ng the prac2ce of mobilizing pa2ents with PACs, our aim was to gather data to support the hypothesis that mobilizing pa2ents who have a PAC is safe.
Presence of PAC is not a contraindica2on to out of bed ac2vity at UCM. This allows for retrospec2ve analysis via chart review to inves2gate whether adverse events occurred in pa2ents who were mobilized while PAC was in place or within 24 hours aDer the PAC was removed.
• Analysis of the preliminary data supports our current prac2ce of mobilizing pa2ents with a PAC.
• There is a need for literature to support PT and OT prac2ces for consistency across ins2tu2ons and to ensure pa2ent safety.
Next Steps
Results
• Total PT/OT sessions with PAC in place=94 sessions • Avg. dura/on of PAC in place=3.6 days • Avg. # of PT/OT sessions per pa/ent with PAC in place=2 sessions
In the seKng of increased Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupa2onal Therapy (OT) involvement in the ICU, there is a need for inves2ga2on of safe mobiliza2on prac2ces in the presence of medical devices. Pa2ents with pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) oDen remain on bed rest due to concerns regarding catheter-‐related adverse events, although there is limited data describing the mobiliza2on of pa2ents with PACs. Pa2ents may be subjected to unnecessary risk associated with bed rest due to the presence of a PAC. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of pulmonary artery catheter-‐related events during PT and OT sessions in a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit (ICU). Addi2onally, pa2ents who remain on bedrest while hospitalized have a greater need for long-‐term care and rehabilita2on than those who undergo early PT and OT.
• Con2nue data collec2on for larger sample size (goal=150 charts) • Complete sta2s2cal analysis to screen for trends, associa2ons • Submit and publish manuscript to disseminate informa2on
Contact: A. Pawlik, [email protected]
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8
G4P Std. Campaign Baseline
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
100.00%
Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Week 6 Week 7 Week 8
G4P Std. Campaign Baseline
Baseline: 58.0% Standard HH Campaign: 72.3%, p<0.001 Giving for Performance: 83.9%, p=0.003
Data Collec/on 1) Administer survey to bedside nurses in cardiothoracic surgery ICU regarding loca2on in medical record of informa2on regarding adverse events
2) Review charts for evidence of the following adverse events while PAC was in place or within 24 hours aDer PAC was removed: • Catheter dislodgement • Bleeding at PAC inser2on site • New onset arrhythmia • Change in heart rhythm • Pulmonary hemorrhage
Retrospec/ve Study: 48 pa&ent charts currently reviewed. Inclusion Criteria • Adults over age 18, admi`ed to the cardiac surgery or
medical ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 7, 2013. • Ac2ve referral to therapy services present in medical record
at the 2me they were admi`ed. • Subjects must have par2cipated in mobility ac2vi2es with
physical or occupa2onal therapy including siKng at the edge of the bed, standing, walking or other ac2vi2es of daily living.
Exclusion Criteria • Subjects unable or inappropriate to par2cipate with out of
bed ac2vity while the PAC was in place for other medical reasons unrelated to the PAC.
• PACs placed in the femoral artery
Discharge disposi&on (n = 48) • Home = 36 (75%) • Acute Rehab = 8 (17%) • SNF = 1 (2%) • Deceased = 3 (6%)
0 20 40 60 80 100
Sit EOB Stand
Ambulate ADLs
% of pa/ents
Ac/v
ity
Ac/vi/es Completed with PAC in Place
0
5
10
15
20
Arrhythmia Line dislodgement
PA hemorrhage
Site bleeding
# of pa/
ents
Adverse Events
Prior to ini2a2on of PT/OT ADer ini2a2on of PT/OT