+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Background The Intervention...

Background The Intervention...

Date post: 12-Jul-2018
Category:
Upload: dinhnhan
View: 218 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Safety of Out of Bed Ac/vity and Ambula/on in Pa/ents with Pulmonary Artery Catheters A. Pawlik, PT; C. Esbrook, OTR/L; S. Harrison, PT; C. Steinberg, OTR/L, V. Jeevanandam, MD University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States Background Aims The Intervention Lessons Learned Due to the absence of literature suppor2ng or refu2ng the prac2ce of mobilizing pa2ents with PACs, our aim was to gather data to support the hypothesis that mobilizing pa2ents who have a PAC is safe. Presence of PAC is not a contraindica2on to out of bed ac2vity at UCM. This allows for retrospec2ve analysis via chart review to inves2gate whether adverse events occurred in pa2ents who were mobilized while PAC was in place or within 24 hours aDer the PAC was removed. Analysis of the preliminary data supports our current prac2ce of mobilizing pa2ents with a PAC. There is a need for literature to support PT and OT prac2ces for consistency across ins2tu2ons and to ensure pa2ent safety. Next Steps Results Total PT/OT sessions with PAC in place=94 sessions Avg. dura/on of PAC in place=3.6 days Avg. # of PT/OT sessions per pa/ent with PAC in place=2 sessions In the seKng of increased Physical Therapy (PT) and Occupa2onal Therapy (OT) involvement in the ICU, there is a need for inves2ga2on of safe mobiliza2on prac2ces in the presence of medical devices. Pa2ents with pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) oDen remain on bed rest due to concerns regarding catheterrelated adverse events, although there is limited data describing the mobiliza2on of pa2ents with PACs. Pa2ents may be subjected to unnecessary risk associated with bed rest due to the presence of a PAC. The purpose of this study is to examine the incidence of pulmonary artery catheterrelated events during PT and OT sessions in a cardiothoracic surgery intensive care unit (ICU). Addi2onally, pa2ents who remain on bedrest while hospitalized have a greater need for longterm care and rehabilita2on than those who undergo early PT and OT. Con2nue data collec2on for larger sample size (goal=150 charts) Complete sta2s2cal analysis to screen for trends, associa2ons Submit and publish manuscript to disseminate informa2on Contact: A. Pawlik, [email protected] Data Collec/on 1) Administer survey to bedside nurses in cardiothoracic surgery ICU regarding loca2on in medical record of informa2on regarding adverse events 2) Review charts for evidence of the following adverse events while PAC was in place or within 24 hours aDer PAC was removed: Catheter dislodgement Bleeding at PAC inser2on site New onset arrhythmia Change in heart rhythm Pulmonary hemorrhage Retrospec/ve Study: 48 pa&ent charts currently reviewed. Inclusion Criteria Adults over age 18, admi‘ed to the cardiac surgery or medical ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 7, 2013. Ac2ve referral to therapy services present in medical record at the 2me they were admi‘ed. Subjects must have par2cipated in mobility ac2vi2es with physical or occupa2onal therapy including siKng at the edge of the bed, standing, walking or other ac2vi2es of daily living. Exclusion Criteria Subjects unable or inappropriate to par2cipate with out of bed ac2vity while the PAC was in place for other medical reasons unrelated to the PAC. PACs placed in the femoral artery Discharge disposi&on (n = 48) Home = 36 (75%) Acute Rehab = 8 (17%) SNF = 1 (2%) Deceased = 3 (6%) 0 20 40 60 80 100 Sit EOB Stand Ambulate ADLs % of pa/ents Ac/vity Ac/vi/es Completed with PAC in Place 0 5 10 15 20 Arrhythmia Line dislodgement PA hemorrhage Site bleeding # of pa/ents Adverse Events Prior to ini2a2on of PT/OT ADer ini2a2on of PT/OT
Transcript
Page 1: Background The Intervention Resultswordpress.uchospitals.edu/.../2014/02/27_Pawlik-PAC-April-2014.pdfContact: A. Pawlik, amy.pawlik@uchospitals.edu 40.00% 50.00% 60.00% 70.00% 80.00%

Safety  of  Out  of  Bed  Ac/vity  and  Ambula/on  in  Pa/ents  with  Pulmonary  Artery  Catheters  A.  Pawlik,  PT;  C.  Esbrook,  OTR/L;  S.  Harrison,  PT;  C.  Steinberg,  OTR/L,  V.  Jeevanandam,  MD  

University  of  Chicago  Medicine,  Chicago,  IL,  United  States  

Background

Aims

The Intervention

Lessons Learned

Due  to  the  absence  of  literature  suppor2ng  or  refu2ng  the  prac2ce  of  mobilizing  pa2ents  with  PACs,  our  aim  was  to  gather  data  to  support  the  hypothesis  that  mobilizing  pa2ents  who  have  a  PAC  is  safe.  

Presence  of  PAC  is  not  a  contraindica2on  to  out  of  bed  ac2vity  at  UCM.    This  allows  for  retrospec2ve  analysis  via  chart  review  to  inves2gate  whether  adverse  events  occurred  in  pa2ents  who  were  mobilized  while  PAC  was  in  place  or  within  24  hours  aDer  the  PAC  was  removed.

•  Analysis  of  the  preliminary  data  supports  our  current  prac2ce  of  mobilizing  pa2ents  with  a  PAC.      

•  There  is  a  need  for  literature  to  support  PT  and  OT  prac2ces  for  consistency  across  ins2tu2ons  and  to  ensure  pa2ent  safety.      

Next Steps

Results

• Total  PT/OT  sessions  with  PAC  in  place=94  sessions  • Avg.  dura/on  of  PAC  in  place=3.6  days  • Avg.  #  of  PT/OT  sessions  per  pa/ent  with  PAC  in  place=2  sessions  

In  the  seKng  of  increased  Physical  Therapy  (PT)  and  Occupa2onal  Therapy  (OT)  involvement  in  the  ICU,  there  is  a  need  for  inves2ga2on  of  safe  mobiliza2on  prac2ces  in  the  presence  of  medical  devices.  Pa2ents  with  pulmonary  artery  catheters  (PAC)  oDen  remain  on  bed  rest  due  to  concerns  regarding  catheter-­‐related  adverse  events,  although  there  is  limited  data  describing  the  mobiliza2on  of  pa2ents  with  PACs.  Pa2ents  may  be  subjected  to  unnecessary  risk  associated  with  bed  rest  due  to  the  presence  of  a  PAC.  The  purpose  of  this  study  is  to  examine  the  incidence  of  pulmonary  artery  catheter-­‐related  events  during  PT  and  OT  sessions  in  a  cardiothoracic  surgery  intensive  care  unit  (ICU).    Addi2onally,  pa2ents  who  remain  on  bedrest  while  hospitalized  have  a  greater  need  for  long-­‐term  care  and  rehabilita2on  than  those  who  undergo  early  PT  and  OT.

•  Con2nue  data  collec2on  for  larger  sample  size  (goal=150  charts)  •  Complete  sta2s2cal  analysis  to  screen  for  trends,  associa2ons  •  Submit  and  publish  manuscript  to  disseminate  informa2on  

Contact: A. Pawlik, [email protected]

40.00%  

50.00%  

60.00%  

70.00%  

80.00%  

90.00%  

100.00%  

Week  1  Week  2  Week  3  Week  4  Week  5  Week  6  Week  7  Week  8  

G4P   Std.  Campaign   Baseline  

40.00%  

50.00%  

60.00%  

70.00%  

80.00%  

90.00%  

100.00%  

Week  1  Week  2  Week  3  Week  4  Week  5  Week  6  Week  7  Week  8  

G4P   Std.  Campaign   Baseline  

Baseline: 58.0% Standard HH Campaign: 72.3%, p<0.001 Giving for Performance: 83.9%, p=0.003

Data  Collec/on  1)  Administer  survey  to  bedside  nurses  in  cardiothoracic  surgery  ICU  regarding  loca2on  in  medical  record  of  informa2on  regarding  adverse  events    

2)  Review  charts  for  evidence  of  the  following  adverse  events  while  PAC  was  in  place  or  within  24  hours  aDer  PAC  was  removed:  •  Catheter  dislodgement  •  Bleeding  at  PAC  inser2on  site  •  New  onset  arrhythmia  •  Change  in  heart  rhythm  •  Pulmonary  hemorrhage  

Retrospec/ve  Study:      48  pa&ent  charts  currently  reviewed.  Inclusion  Criteria  •  Adults  over  age  18,  admi`ed  to  the  cardiac  surgery  or  

medical  ICU  between  January  1,  2010  and  December  7,  2013.    •  Ac2ve  referral  to  therapy  services  present  in  medical  record  

at  the  2me  they  were  admi`ed.    •  Subjects  must  have  par2cipated  in  mobility  ac2vi2es  with  

physical  or  occupa2onal  therapy  including  siKng  at  the  edge  of  the  bed,  standing,  walking  or  other  ac2vi2es  of  daily  living.  

   Exclusion  Criteria  •  Subjects  unable  or  inappropriate  to  par2cipate  with  out  of  

bed  ac2vity  while  the  PAC  was  in  place  for  other  medical  reasons  unrelated  to  the  PAC.    

•  PACs  placed  in  the  femoral  artery  

Discharge  disposi&on  (n  =  48)  •  Home  =  36      (75%)  •  Acute  Rehab  =  8        (17%)  •  SNF  =  1    (2%)  •  Deceased  =  3      (6%)  

0   20   40   60   80   100  

Sit  EOB  Stand  

Ambulate  ADLs  

%  of  pa/ents  

Ac/v

ity  

Ac/vi/es  Completed  with  PAC  in  Place  

0  

5  

10  

15  

20  

Arrhythmia   Line  dislodgement  

PA  hemorrhage  

Site  bleeding  

#  of  pa/

ents  

Adverse  Events  

Prior  to  ini2a2on  of  PT/OT   ADer  ini2a2on  of  PT/OT  

Recommended