+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006. Two projects in Oslo and Bergen...

BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006. Two projects in Oslo and Bergen...

Date post: 13-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: derrick-bridges
View: 214 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
23
BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court started 1. January 2006. • Two projects in Oslo and Bergen • Established two DC-centres • Duration: End of 2010
Transcript

BACKGROUND The Norwegian Drug Court

started 1. January 2006.

• Two projects in Oslo and Bergen• Established two DC-centres• Duration: End of 2010

The purpose of the project• Alternative to prison• Reduce criminality• Reduce use of illegal drugs• Improve: - health of the participants - social conditions - housing etc.

The Target Groups

• The first client into the program March 2006

• People with drug related crime• Motivated for the DC-program - concent to forensic research - meet for consultations at the centre

Oslo

• In 2009 44 persons were forensic researched

• Only 11 were found suitable for the program

Too few suitable for the program?

Gender

• In 2009 6 of 44 persons were women

• In 2008 6 of 41 persons were women

Who takes initiative to the forensic research?

• In Oslo 3/4 of all initiatives were taken by the client’s defender

• Just 1/5 of the initiatives were taken by the police

• 1/10 by the courts

Oslo (per 31.12.09)

• The DC-centre has received 39 persons in the program

- 7 persons finished the program - 13 persons are still in the program• 19 persons dropped out of the

program - new criminality - did not follow the program

- 9 of these dropped the program in 2009

- 5 persons fullfilled the program in 2009

Positive development

EVALUATION: Preliminary Evaluation March 2010

By the end of 2009 totally 85 clients were in the program.

Of these 26 clients have been interviewed 3 times.

The Norwegian Institute for Alcohol and Drug Research (SIRUS) has conducted a preliminary

evaluation of the projects in Bergen and Oslo.

• Now 85 clients totally in the program• By the end of 2007 47 clients• Of these 26 clients are interviewed at 3

different times during the program: T1 - By the time they enter the program after the sentence in the court T2 - After one year in the program T3 - After two years in the program

Methode/instrument used: ASI (Addiction Severity Index) which covers:

- use of illegal drugs - criminality - health - work - family - social condition

Of the 47 clients in 2006 and 2007, 64% dropped out of the program.

• 19% (5) of the 26 clients fullfilled the program

• 15% (4) are still in the program• 65% (17) have dropped out

Is this a good result?

Drop outs

• Average time in the program: 223 days

• Shortest: 15 days• Longest: 874 days

The probation will make the clients stay longer in the project.

Use of drugs on T1, T2 and T3

• T1 - 69%• T2 - 46%• T3 - 54%

Specific drug use (%) N=26

T1 T3• Heroin 27 12• Amphetamine 42 39• Cocaine 8 0• Cannabis 50 39

There is a certain decline in illegal use of drugs.

Effect on criminality?

• Illegal sale or posession of drugs• Stealing, robbery etc.• Violence

Charge with crime (%)

T1 T2 T3Sale or posession 100 23 27Stealing, robbery 100 38 31Violence 50 12 15Other crime 8 4 0

The program seems to have a positive effect on reducing crime.

The gravity of criminality

• There is a promising trend towards reducing the gravity of the criminality, specially among the clients who are not in the control institutions.

• Internationally: Drug Courts seem to reduce the risk of recidive generally.

• This seems also to be the best effect of the DC-program for Norway.

CONCLUSIONS

• Scientifically there is no sufficient data to conclude that DC-program will reduce the illegal use of drugs among the clients substansially. However there is a promising tendency.

• The DC-program is more promising concerning the aim to reduce the criminality among the clients.

QUESTIONS

Do the results make it worth continuing the program?

• Resources• Any benefits for the clients• Protecton for the society


Recommended