+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BAM4 with rationality.ppt

BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Date post: 01-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: timothy212
View: 544 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
 
Popular Tags:
23
Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies Rich Picture Example • In groups develop a rich picture to express how Singaporean/Hong Kong Companies can take (further) advantage of e-commerce opportunities. Cover the issues, problems and opportunities related to taking advantage of the opportunities.
Transcript
Page 1: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rich Picture Example

• In groups develop a rich picture to express how Singaporean/Hong Kong Companies can take (further) advantage of e-commerce opportunities. Cover the issues, problems and opportunities related to taking advantage of the opportunities.

Page 2: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Systems Thinking(Jackson)

• There is some debate in relation to business analysis methodologies

• Jackson for example labels:– Total Quality Management– Business Process Re-engineering– Learning organisation – Guru theory

• Fads!

Page 3: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Systems Approach

• Systems approach is holistic

• Holistic solution looks at the entire problem

• Avoids breaking it up into components

• Systems interact and create emergent properties

• Can be a way of thinking- ontological

• Can be used to understand situations - epistemological

Page 4: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Progress in Management Science & Systems Thinking

Increasing divergence of values/interests

Unitary Pluralist Conflictual

Simple

Complex

Increasing Complexity

ORSoft OR/Systems

Design of Adaptive Systems ?

Problems more difficult to manage

Page 5: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

History of Management Problem Solving

• Frederick Taylor’s “Scientific Management” pre 1st WW as a problem solving methodology

• Operational research came into being in 1940’s

• Then systems analysis and systems engineering

• Systems thinking

Page 6: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

• Researchers on the horizontal axis emphasise the importance of values, beliefs and philosophies

• Their main concern is changing organisational culture and gaining commitment from participants to a course of action

• Moved from positivist to a interpretive approach• Soft ORers and systems thinkers do not try to

design models for repetitive use

Page 7: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

• Reason? Due to individual nature of problems

• The methodology is replicated!– Checkland, Flood and Jackson

• Jackson argues that steady progress has taken place in the development of management problem solving

Page 8: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Management Fads

• Guru Theory– Peter’s & Waterman “In Search of

Excellence” - included Management by Walking About

• Heathrow (Changi) School of Management

• Follow based on faith rather argument

• Write in such a way that skips details

• They sell lots of books! Why?

Page 9: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

• They tell stories• Three kinds of Guru

– Academic Gurus– Consultant Gurus - eg. de Bono, Peters– Hero Managers - Iacocca

• Many contradictions from one book to another– Customer is king– Flexibility replaces customer is king– Later it was something else– Rationale?

Page 10: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

• TQM - includes continuous quality improvement programmes– drive defects out and designing quality in– at all stages of the production process

• Required fundamental orientation to the customer• Coordination of all stages of production to get

conformance to requirements• Included suppliers to get quality raw materials or

products or services

Page 11: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

TQM

• TQM programmes frequently fail according to surveys - no real impact

• Reasons - TQM focuses on customers at the expense of other stakeholders

• Some argue customers don’t know what they want!

• Some believe employees are the most important stakeholders

Page 12: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

BPR & Learning Organisations• BPR - another fad? We will look at this

later?

• Learning organisation– Peter Senge - The Fifth Discipline (1990)– limited selection of systems ideas– continually expanding its capacity to create

its future– means people have to keep learning

Page 13: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Learning Organisation

• Managers must master 5 disciplines– Systems– personal mastery– mental models– building shared vision– team learning

Page 14: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Conclusions

• The point of systems thinking is to

“help us to work out the right course of action to take

• No real hope of a unified theory of systems

• Careful research (critical reflection) is required as opposed to fadism

Page 15: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Questions• Do you agree with Jackson’s view (fads) of

– Guru Theory– TQM– Learning organisations

• Why does he uphold the credibility of systems thinking?

• Where does systems theory beat the “fads”?

• What faults can you find with his argument?

Page 16: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Questions

• Does systems thinking as an approach have much to offer business analysis?– What?

• Is the success of systems thinking dependent on the cultural context?

Page 17: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rationality Concepts and Methodologies

• Klien and Hirschheim’s paper examines rationality in ISD methodologies

• It is important because it influences – the way that the business analyst goes

about his/her job– what the expectations are– and which tasks are given priority

Page 18: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rationality• There are two types of rational action

• The first is formal rationality

• The second is substantive rationality

• Formal rationality pays explicit attention to both means and ends when calculating the best choice

• Substantive rationality is where the actions are consistent with an ultimate value ideal

Page 19: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Formal Rationality

• FR is oriented towards the choice of:– means - effective planning when ends are

given– ends - rationality focuses on the correctness

of calculation of ends when values are precisely specified, and means and constraints are given

• Substantive rationality is oriented towards an absolute value

Page 20: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rationality in Methodologies

Formal Substantive

Means Ends

StructuredMethodologies

Yes Some None

Prototyping Some Little Possible

ETHICS Some Yes Yes

ISAC Yes Yes Yes (< Ethics)

SSM Yes Possible None

MULTIVIEW Yes Yes None

FAOR Yes Yes None

Page 21: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rationality in Methodologies

Formal Substantive Communicative

Emancipatory

Means Ends

StructuredMethodologies

Yes Some None Little None

Prototyping Some Little Possible Yes Possible

ETHICS Some Yes Yes Some Little

ISAC Yes Yes Yes (<Ethics)

Yes Little

SSM Yes Possible None Yes Some

MULTIVIEW Yes Yes None Yes None

FAOR Yes Yes None Yes None

Page 22: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Rationality in Business Analysis

• It is important to know the basis of rationality in the organisation when performing business analysis

• It may be important to get users involved - the means may be more important than the ends

• In some cases the end may be everything

• In some cultures the substantive rationality may be important

Page 23: BAM4 with rationality.ppt

Craig Standing Business Analysis Methodologies

Questions• How does the rationality basis influence

how you approach business analysis?• How do you determine what the rationality

basis of the situation requires?• What problems may arise as a result of

choosing the “wrong” methodology?• What are the likely consequences of a

“rationality clash”?


Recommended