1
SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT POLICY FOR BANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREA
Mr. Rudi Mahmud Z, MSP , MT
OUTLINE
• BACKGROUND• DESCRIPTION OF BMA• STRATEGIC ISSUES OF BMA• SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT
POLICY IN BANDUNG CITY
2
Based on Gov’t Regulation No.26/2008 Bandung Metropolitan Area (BMA) is :
– National Activity Center (Pusat Kegiatan Nasional) – National Strategic Area (Kawasan Strategis
Nasional)
• BMA has a significant role as :• national center of activities• Regional and national scale economic
growth pole
• Provision of regional infrastructure
• Spatial Planning
consequences
BACKGROUND
THE PROFILE OFBANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREA
3
Bandung Metropolitan Area
Total Area 343.267 Ha, consist of : • Bandung City (16.729,65 Ha)• Cimahi City (4.023 Ha)• Bandung and West Bandung Regency
(307.389 Ha)• Part of Sumedang Regency (15.486 Ha)
DemographyTotal Population 6.893.009peopleDensity 20 people/hectarePopulation Growth 2,86%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
% %
%
%
%
%
%
%
$
$
$
$
$
D AYEU HKO LOT
CI WI DEY
IB UN
PACE T
KERTA SAR I
CI CALEN GKA
RAN CAE KEK
LEM BAN G
NG AMPR AH
CI PEUN DE UY
CIP ARA Y
MAJALA YA PASE H
SOL OKAN JER UK
CI KANC UNG NAG REG
CI LEUN YI JATI NANG OR
CIM ANG GU NG
TAN JUNG SAR I
SUK ASA RI
CI ME NYA N
PAR ON GPO NG
CI SAR UA
CIK ALON G WETAN
PAD ALARA NG
C IPA TAT
C ILI LIN
KA TAPAN G
M ARG AHA YU
M ARG AASI H
P AME UNG PEU K
BANJA RAN ARJAS ARI
CI MAU NG
PAN GAL ENG AN
PAS IRJA MB U
S ORE ANG
S IND ANG KER TA
G UNU NG HALU
RAN CABA LI
RO NGG A CI PO NG KOR
B ATUJAJA RC ILEN GK RANG
W ADUK SA GULING
W ADUK CIRA TA
KOTA BANDUNG
KOTA CIM AHI
KABUPATEN B ANDUNG
KABUPATEN SUMEDANG
G. P atu ha
G. Ma laba r
G . K ren c
G. Man dala wang i
G. T angku ban P arahu
BALEEN DA H
B OJON GS OANG
S . Cik ap u nd u n g
S. C
ibe
ureu
m
S . Ci ta
ru m
S . Cita r ik
S . Cit ar
ik
S. C
ita
rum
Hu
l u
S. C
isa
ngk
uy
S . Ciwi
de y
2,86206.893.009Total
3,003284.846Jatinangor
3,001664.060Cimanggung
2,251658.472Tanjungsari
1,74105424.932Cimahi City
2,80133.927.575Bandung & West Bandung Regency
4,371392.333.124Bandung City
Pop.Growth(%)
Pop.Density
(people/Ha)
Population (people)
BandungMetropolitan
Area
4
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%%
%
%
%
%
%
%
$
$
$
$
$
DA Y EUHK OLOT
CI WIDE Y
I BUN
P A CET
KE RT AS A RI
CICA L ENGK A
RA NCA E KE K
LE MB ANG
NGA MP RAH
CIP E UNDE UY
CIP A RA Y
MAJ A LA Y AP AS E H
S OL OKA N J E RUK
CIK A NCUNG NA GRE G
CI LE UNYIJ A TI NANGOR
CIMA NGGUNG
T ANJ UNGS A RI
S UK A S A RI
CI MENY A N
P ARONGP ONG
CI S ARUA
CI K AL ONG WE TA N
P A DA L A RA NG
CI P AT A T
CI LI LI N
K AT A P ANG
MA RGA HA YU
MA RGA A SI H
P A ME UNGP E UK
B A NJ A RANARJ AS A RI
CIMA UNG
P ANGA L ENGA N
P A SI RJA MB U
S OREA NG
S INDA NGK E RTA
GUNUNGHA LU
RA NCAB A L I
RONGGA CIP ONGKOR
BA T UJA JA R
CIL ENGK RANG
W ADUK SAG ULI NG
W ADUK CI RATA
KOTA BAN DUN G
KOTA CI MA HI
KABU PATEN BAN DUNG
KAB UPATE N SU MED ANG
G. Pa tu h a
G. Ma lab a r
G. Kre n c en g
G. Man d a la wa n g i
G. Ta n g ku b an Pa r ah u
BAL EENDAH
BOJ ONGSOANG
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%%
%
%
%
%
%
%
$
$
$
$
$
D AY E U HK O LO T
CI WID EY
IB U N
PA C ET
K E R TA S AR I
CI CA L EN G K A
R A N CA E KE K
LE MB AN G
N G A MPR A H
C IP EU N D EU Y
C IP A R AY
MA J AL A YAP AS E H
S O LO K A N JE R UK
C IK AN C U NG N AG R E G
C IL E UN Y IJA T IN AN G O R
CI MAN G G U NG
TA N JU N G SA R I
S U KA S A RI
C IME N Y AN
P AR O N G PO N G
C IS AR U A
C IK AL O N G WE TA N
P A D AL A RA N G
CI PA T A T
C ILI LI N
K A TA P AN G
MA RG A H AY U
MA R GA A S IH
P A ME U N GP E U K
B AN J A RA N A R JA S A RI
C IMA U NG
P AN G A LE N G AN
P A S IR JA MBU
S O R EA N G
SI ND A N G KE R TA
G U N UN G H A LU
RA N C AB A LI
R ON G G A C IP O NG K O R
B AT U JA JA R
C IL EN G K R AN G
W ADUK SAGUL ING
WADUK CI RATA
KOTA BAND UNG
KO TA C IMA HI
KABU PATEN BANDU NG
KABU PATEN S UMEDA NG
G. P a tu ha
G. Ma la ba r
G. K re n ce n g
G. Ma n d ala wa ng i
G. T an g ku b an P a ra h u
BA LE E NDA H
BOJ ONGS OANG
Cililin
Padalaran g Lemban g
SoreangBanjaran
Majalaya
Rancae kek
Jatin an gorBandu ng -Cimahi
Cipeu nde uy
Pangale ng an
Padalaran g Lemban g
SoreangBanjaran
Majala ya
Rancae kek
Jatin an gorBandu ng -Cimahi
Cipeu nde uy
Cililin
Pangale ng an
2004
2001
1994The Growth of Built Up Area
in BMA
3,53 %
40,4 %34,57 %
Jabar34,57 %
DKI 5,3 %
Banten4,76 %
Jatim40,4 %
Jateng9,59 %
Jogja0,71 %
Regional Trading of Bandung Metropolitan Area(Flow of goods from Bandung Metropolitan Area)
ECONOMY
5
ENVIRONMENTENVIRONMENT
: Very Poor (DO < 2 ppm)
: Poor (2<DO<3 ppm)
: Good (DO>3 ppm)
Garut
Sumedang
Subang
CianjurMajalaya
Rancaekek
Ujung-Berung
Banjaran
CimahiBatujajar
Gn Wayang
Dayeuhkolot
Location of Industries
IPAL terpadu
BANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREABANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREA
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
%
% %
%
%
%
%
%
%
$
$
$
$
$
DA YEU HKO LOT
CI WID EY
IBU N
PACE T
K ERT ASAR I
CI CA LENG KA
RAN CA EKE K
LE MBA NG
NGA MP RAH
CI PEU ND EU Y
C IPA RA Y
MA JALA YAPA SEH
SO LO KAN JER UK
CIK ANC UN G NAG RE G
CI LEU NY IJAT INA NG OR
CI M ANG GU NG
TA NJU NG SAR I
SU KAS ARI
CI M ENY AN
PA RON GP ON G
CI SARU A
CI KALO NG W ETAN
PAD ALAR AN G
C IP ATAT
C ILI LIN
K ATA PANG
M ARG AH AYU
M AR GA ASI H
PAM EU NG PEU K
BAN JAR AN ARJAS AR I
CI MA UNG
PA NGA LEN GA N
P ASI RJAM BU
SOR EA NG
SIN DAN G KER TA
G UN UNG H ALU
RA NCA BAL I
RO NG GA CI PO NG KO R
BAT UJAJA RCI LEN GK RAN G
W ADUK SAGUL ING
W ADUK CIRAT A
KOTA BAN DUNG
KOTA C IMAHI
KABUPA TEN B ANDU NG
KABUPA TEN S UMEDAN G
G. P at uha
G. Mal aba r
G. K renc eng
G. Ma nda lawang i
G. Tan gkub an Parah u
BA LEENDA H
BOJONGS OA NG
S . Cik a pun du n g
S.
Cib
eur
eum
S. Cit
a ru m
S . Cit ar ik
S. Ci
ta ri k
S.
Cita
rum
H
ulu
S. C
isan
gk
uy
S. Ciw
id e y
REGIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE
Waste Disposal Level of Services :–Bandung Regency 23% –Bandung City 60%–Sumedang Regency 96%
W astewater Treatment Facil it y :
• IPAL Bojongsoang, the capacit y is 80.835 m2/day, served people of Bandung City and Bandung Regency.
• IPLT Cibeet, the capacit y is 25 m2/day, served part p art of Bandung Regency.
Total flood risk area in BMA are 14.480 haRegional Drainage System has not been established
6
STRATEGIC ISSUES OF BANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREA
REGIONAL ISSUES OF BMA
• GROWTH OF URBAN POPULATION
••FAST GROWING FAST GROWING NEEDS OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURENEEDS OF URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE••DEGRADATION OF DEGRADATION OF ENVIRONMENT QUALITYENVIRONMENT QUALITY
••LAND CONVERSION INTO BUILT UP AREALAND CONVERSION INTO BUILT UP AREA
LIMITED CARRYING CAPACITYLIMITED CARRYING CAPACITY
7
ENVIRONMENTAL PROGRAM IN BANDUNG METROPOLITAN AREA
Bandung City
West Java Province
8
Bandung City
Foto: Otto Sumarwoto
Current Condition
Waste Volume & Level of Services in West Java
376427
43
45
19
78 2822
3986
13
7285
6249
45
67
84866796
37
60
23
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,000
Kabu
pate
nBa
ndun
g
Kota
Ban
dung
Kota
Cima
hi
Kabu
pate
nSu
med
ang
Kabu
pate
nGa
rut
Kabu
pate
nSu
bang
Kabu
pate
nPu
rwak
arta
Kabu
pate
nBo
gor
Kota
Bogo
r
Kabu
pate
nBe
kasi
Kota
Beka
si
Kota
Depo
k
Kabu
pate
nKa
rawa
ng
Kabu
pate
nSu
kabu
mi
Kota
Suka
bumi
Kabu
pate
nCi
anju
r
Kabu
pate
nTa
sikma
laya
Kota
Tasik
mala
ya
Kabu
pate
nCi
amis
Kabu
pate
nCi
rebo
n
Kota
Cire
bon
Kabu
pate
nIn
dram
ayu
Kabu
pate
nM
ajalen
gka
Kabu
pate
nKu
ning
an
Kota
Banj
ar
Regency/City
Vo
lum
e (m
3/d
ay)
Waste VolumeLevel Of Service
9
Current Condition
The type of formal inst itut ion SWM in West Java
Sub-District Service. 6. 25%
Section -District Service. 1. 4%
UPTD. 1. 4%
Lo cal Co mp any . 1. 4%
(BANDUNG CITY)
Sanitation Office. 3. 13%
District Service . 12. 50%
• The type of formal instit ution that run solid waste management in a certain city will has significant influence on the SWM performance
• The low Level Of Services in Bandung Solid Waste Management caused by the still under-developed & need assistance (subsidy) from the local government to cover overall operational costs
op en dumping, 29 (6 1%)
sanitar y landfil l, 4 ( 8%)
contr olled landfill , 15 (31%)
Current Condition
Final Disposal Site System in West Java
ACTUALLY:• Most of FDS in West Java Province can be classified as dumpfills,
with less than 10% achieving status of controlled landfill. • No sanitary landfill is in existence alt hough there is some being
planned.
10
FDS
TS
MANAGED BY RW OR DISTRICT SERRVICE
MANAGED BY DISTRICT SERRVICE
MARKET
COMMERCIAL /OFFICE
WASTEVOLUM E
Public hous eRESIDENTIAL
STREET /FACILITIES
DUSTBIN
WASTEVOLUM E
MANAGED BY DISTRICT SERRVICE
CONTAINER
WASTEVOLUM E
Current Condition
Existing SWM Operation
SOURCE
• Solid waste collection to transfer station is managed by community
• Solid waste transportation, processing and f inal dumping a re the responsibility of the ope rators.
Current Condition
Communities Involvement
the community altoget her carried out the solid was management
independently
communities generally implement simple processing in the form of composting and recycling
11
LEUWIGAJAH FDSLEUWIGAJAH FDSLEUWIGAJAH FDS
Landslides in Leuwigajah FDS
February 21, 2005
Landslides in Leuwigajah FDS
February 21, 2005
FDS for Bandung City temporary move to Jelekong FDS
FDS for Bandung City temporary move to Jelekong FDS
JELEKONG FDSJELEKONG FDSJELEKONG FDS
Current Condition
JELEKONG FDS:Capacity : 300.000 m3
Lifetime : Until Desember 2005
Current Condition
The Problem
very difficult to find new FDS areas because the public impression and perception of FDS has been largely negative
12
Administrastion: 6,34 M (31,5%)
Dumping: 1.11 M (5,5%)
Transportation7.26 M (36 %)
Collecting : 5,45 M (27 %)
Expenditure on Solid Waste Management Year 2003in Bandung City
• The cost involved in processing t he volume of waste at the FDS is very small
• the solid waste operators put the FDS management at the end priority
Current Condition
Solid Waste Budget
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100%
0
0,20
0,40
0,60
0,80
1,00
1,20
1,40
1,60
1,80
2,00
0
1,97 %
City BudgetBandung
Subsidy0,44 % of APBD
SWM Fee1,53 % of APBD
• Budget allocation from APBD (Annual City Development Budget) for solid waste management is lowest compared to ot her development area.
• Local government put t he solid waste management at t he lowest priority.
13
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollut ion around FDS
Surface & Ground Wat er Pollution
Air Pollution
Soil Pollution
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Sanitat ion around FDS
slums settlement of scavenger
smoke combustion of solid waste
pond of leachate & many flies
14
Environmental Pollution
Flood
floods caused by t he number of solid wastes
in canal or river
Environmental Pollution
Transfer Station underneath elevated
highway under construction
Transfer Station by the road side
15
Needs Of SWM Policy
• Environmental pollution caused by waste management activities in Bandung City
• An appropriate solid waste management policy is needed as reference in implementation of sustainable environmental management
• The bad physical and chemical quality of FDS environmental caused by the open dumping method.
• Many factors becoming cause operated FDS by open dumping (technical, budgeting, and also community participation aspect)
• The paradigm of collect-transport-dump becoming the root of the matter all this
Requirement New Paradigm
The Root of FDS Problems
16
• SWOT method analyzed indicates that Bandung City solid waste management system in SURVIVAL condition
• Bandung City solid waste management policy have should be changed, where THE COLLECT-TRANSPORT-DUMP PARADIGM IS CHANGED INTO SOLID WASTE MINIMIZATION PARADIGM
Requirement New Paradigm
Shifting Paradigm Framework in Bandung City SWM
EXISTING
FUTURE
17
From Policy To Strategy
Shifting Collect-Transport-
Dump Paradigm into Waste
Minimiza tion Paradigm
Waste Minimization to Reduce Management
Burden
Increasing Level of Services in Solid Waste
Management
Management Environment Impact around Final
Disposal Site
Operational improvement with controlled landfill
method
Regional Cooperation in
Solid waste Management
Increase Active Participation of
Community
Waste Minimization To Reduce Management Burden
• To endorse local government in order to begin with shift of solid waste management paradigm to a reduction paradigm.
• To make an informal sector of recycling organizers as working partner by opening the business opportunity for them.
1
Bandung City SWM Strategy
18
Competency of Formal Solid Waste Management Institution
• Increasing capacity and competency of formal solid waste institution.
• Increasing professionalism of institution.
• Developing the financial system to increase the institution competency.
2
Bandung City SWM Strategy
Management Environment Impact Around Final Disposal Site
• Improving the condit ion of FDS environment.• Rehabilitat ion of physical-chemical
environment condition with an approach of friendly environment technology.
• Operational improvement from open dumping to controlled landfill method.
3
Bandung City SWM Strategy
19
Regional Cooperation in Solid Waste Management
• To establish a regional cooperation in carrying out the operation of solid waste management.
• To carry out the institutional function of environment quality observation around FDS.
4
Bandung City SWM Strategy
TS CANDIDATES “LEUWIGAJAH”
TS CANDIDATES “BOJONGSOANG”
TS CANDIDATES“KR. PAWITAN”
FDS CANDIDATES“CITATAH”
FDS CANDIDATES“GUNUNG DURUNG”
20
Law Enforcement and Increase Active Participation of Community
• To increase the socialization of regulation and law and its implementation
• To lift the existence of community or society group which has participated actively in solid waste management in order to become the mediator in campaign programmed
• To build an inter community group network which has worked actively in solid waste management.
• To establish pilot project area, which will become an example for the other region.
5
Bandung City SWM Strategy
• Increasing capacity Bandung City SWM institution• Increasing solid waste recycle center garbage in
intercity service scope• Increasing solid waste recycle information system• FDS operational has been updated from Open
Dumping into Controlled Landfill• Regional Solid Waste Corporation for Greater
Bandung has been implemented
The Objective Bandung City SWM Strategy
Bandung City SWM Strategy
21
Conclusion
• The environment pollution caused by solid waste management activity in Bandung City reveals that the core of the problem is caused by collect-transport-dump paradigm
• Shifting paradigm in solid waste management policy should be taken, where the collect-transport-dump paradigm is changed into solid waste minimization paradigm
• Final Disposal S ite should be developed through the mechanism of inter town cooperation
• Generate and develop an active participation of the community in solid waste management
THE END
Thank you for your kind attention
