+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BANKWEST CURTIN ECONOMICS CENTRE POWER TO THE PEOPLE€¦ · The Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre...

BANKWEST CURTIN ECONOMICS CENTRE POWER TO THE PEOPLE€¦ · The Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre...

Date post: 27-Jun-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 9 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
96
WA's Energy Future BANKWEST CURTIN ECONOMICS CENTRE Focus on Industry Series, No. 2 August 2017 POWER TO THE PEOPLE
Transcript

WA's Energy Future

BANKWEST CURTIN ECONOMICS CENTRE

Focus on Industry Series, No. 2August 2017

POWER TOTHE PEOPLE

About the Centre

The Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre is an independent economic and social research organisation located within the Curtin Business School at Curtin University. The centre was established in 2012 through the generous support from Bankwest (a division of the Commonwealth Bank of Australia), with a core mission to examine the key economic and social policy issues that contribute to the sustainability of Western Australia and the wellbeing of WA households.

The Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre is the first research organisation of its kind in Western Australia, and draws great strength and credibility from its partnership with Bankwest, Curtin University and the Western Australian government.

The centre brings a unique philosophy to research on the major economic issues facing the state. By bringing together experts from the research, policy and business communities at all stages of the process – from framing and conceptualising research questions, through the conduct of research, to the communication and implementation of research findings – we ensure that our research is relevant, fit for purpose, and makes a genuine difference to the lives of Australians, both in WA and nationally.

The centre is able to capitalise on Curtin University’s reputation for excellence in economic modelling, forecasting, public policy research, trade and industrial economics and spatial sciences. Centre researchers have specific expertise in economic forecasting, quantitative modelling, micro-data analysis and economic and social policy evaluation. The centre also derives great value from its close association with experts from the corporate, business, public and not-for-profit sectors.

Contents

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

i

List of figuresList of tablesForewordExecutive summaryKey findings

iiiiiivv

vi

Introduction xThe energy sector in the WA economy

The evolution of the energy sector in WAContributions to the WA economyEmployment in energy

1248

Electricity in WA Sources of electricity

Generation and loadInnovation

17192426

Future sources: 100% renewables?Renewables as an energy sourceInvestment in renewablesIs 100% renewables realistic?

31333842

Consumption and costsConsumption of energyEnergy costs in WAHousehold utilities expenditure

45475154

Power to all peopleHousehold energy costs and energy povertyHouseholds’ access to solar technologies

596165

WA's Energy Future: Summary and DiscussionEvolution of the WA energy sectorThe future energy landscapeEnergy affordability What does the Finkel Review mean for WA?RegulationA roadmap to our energy future

67697071727374

Glossary and Technical Notes 75References 79

List of figures

ii

Figure 1 WA consumption by fuel type 2

Figure 2 WA’s agricultural industry at a glance 3

Figure 3 Value of electricity and gas utilities to the Australian economy 4

Figure 4 Gross value added of electricity, gas, water and waste services to WA economy

5

Figure 5 Contributions of electricity, gas, water and waste services to WA and Australian economy

6

Figure 6 Agriculture employment as a share of total employment: by state/territory, 2005-2016

7

Figure 7 Employment shares by WA energy sub-sector: broad employment definitions 8

Figure 8 Patterns of employment across WA energy sub-sectors: 2011 to 2016 9

Figure 9 Total employment in energy sector (alternative definition), by state: 2007 to 2017

10

Figure 10 WA’s share of national energy employment, 2007 and 2017 11

Figure 11 Energy employment as a share of total employment: by state/territory, 2007 to 2017

11

Figure 12 WA utility’s employment as a share of total employment: by region, 2001 to 2017 12

Figure 13 WA’s total employment by energy sub-components, 2001 to 2017 13

Figure 14 Employment by type in the energy sector: WA, 1986 to 2017 14

Figure 15 Full-time and part-time employment, WA utilities sector: by occupation, 1987 to 2017

14

Figure 16 WA electricity generation capacity by source 21

Figure 17 Summer and winter electricity load in WA: 2016, by time of day 24

Figure 18 Comparison of summer and winter electricity loads in WA: 2007 to 2016 25

Figure 19 Share of innovation-active businesses by sector: 2014-15 and change from 2012-13

26

Figure 20 Incidence and novelty of product innovation by industry sector: 2014-15 27

Figure 21 Incidence and novelty of operational process innovation by industry sector: 2014-15

28

Figure 22 Drivers of innovation in utilities sector: 2014-15 29

Figure 23 Drivers of innovation in utilities sector compared with all businesses: 2008-09 to 2014-15

29

Figure 24 Self-reported barriers to innovation, utilities sector and all businesses: 2014-15

30

Figure 25 Self-reported barriers to innovation, utilities sector and all businesses: 2008-09 to 2014-15

30

Figure 26 Proportion of electricity generation sourced by renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

34

Figure 27 Proportion of electricity generation sourced by renewables, states and territories (excluding SA and Tas): 2008-09 to 2014-15

35

Figure 28 Composition of renewable energy fuels used for electricity generation: WA and Australia, 2014-15

36

Figure 29 Composition of renewable energy fuels used for electricity generation - WA, 2008-09 to 2014-15

37

iii

iii

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 30 Renewable projects under construction end of 2016 and to start construction in 2017

40

Figure 31 Generating capacity from WA rooftop solar, 2016 to 2022 41

Figure 32 Levelised cost of electricity, new builds, Australia, 2017 43

Figure 33 Annual energy consumption per million population, states and territories: by fuel type, 1960-61 to 2014-15

47

Figure 34 Annual electricity consumption by states and territories: per million population, 1960-61 to 2014-15

48

Figure 35 Annual electricity consumption by states and territories: per million population, 1960-61 to 2014-15

49

Figure 36 Annual energy consumption per million population, states and territories: by fuel type, 1960-61 to 2014-15

50

Figure 37 Annual energy consumption per million population, states and territories: by fuel type, March 2000 to June 2017

52

Figure 38 Regulated residential electricity tariff charges for WA: July 2009 to July 2017

54

Figure 39 WA annual electricity costs: illustrative WA residential household, July 2009 to July 2017

55

Figure 40 WA household energy spending shares, by income: 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15

56

Figure 41 Variation in household energy expenditure shares in WA, by family type: 2014/15

62

Figure 42 Shares of WA households with more than 10 per cent of expenditure on utilities: by family type: 2006-07 to 2014-15

63

Figure 43 Share of spending on energy, health and groceries by WA single parents, by income percentile: 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15

64

Figure 44 Share of suitable WA dwellings with rooftop Solar PV installed: to June 2017, by level of socioeconomic disadvantage

65

List of tablesTable 1 Composition of the WA economy – gross value added by sector 5

Table 2 Electricity generation in WA, by source: 2008-09 to 2014-15 20

Table 3 Proportion of total net energy consumption sourced from renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

33

Table 4 Direct FTE Employment in Renewable Energy - Western Australia, 2009-10 to 2015-16

37

Table 5 Proportion of total energy consumption sourced from renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

55

Table 6 Average household energy spending, by state/territory & family type, uprated to June 2017

61

Table 7 Average household spending on utilities in WA: by family type, 2006-07 to 2014-15

62

Table 8 Shares of suitable WA dwellings with rooftop Solar PV installed: to June 2017, by state/territory and level of socioeconomic disadvantage

66

Foreword

iv

While there are many societal issues facing the world today, one could argue climate change and renewable energy technologies are universal in their need for action. Without a world to live in, what is the point of a solid education and good health?

Given our isolation and abundance of sunshine, Western Australia is in a unique position to foster innovation, so it’s surprising that we are not at the forefront of new energy technology creation and uptake in Australia.

This second report in our Focus on Industry series closely examines WA’s energy sector, and asks whether our State is positioned to take advantage of the multitude of energy technologies on the horizon.

We look at the historical relationship WA has with energy, and the State’s slow uptake of renewables. The report also reviews the sector as a whole, the employment and economic value it contributes to WA and the impact of rising energy costs on households in Western Australia.

In a State which enjoys an average of 300 days of full sunshine per year, it is reassuring to find the power generated from household rooftop solar is the second largest source of energy in the State. However, what is it that limits industry from moving toward renewable energy technology and what policies are other states and territories implementing that could be a game changer for WA?

This report aims to explore the current distribution and costs, and asks whether everyone in the State has access to affordable, reliable sources of energy to power their homes.

What becomes apparent is the need for a collaborative approach and clear leadership in developing solutions to improve access and affordability of energy. This is coupled with the need to understand the importance of all forms of energy technology, within a less adversarial conversation.

I’d like to thank the many stakeholders from the government, policy and energy sectors who gave us such valuable insights that helped shape the ideas behind our research. We hope the findings delivered in this report will shed some light on the WA energy industry and help bring more power to the people.

Professor Alan DuncanDirector, Bankwest Curtin Economics CentreCurtin Business School, Curtin University

Executive summary

Energy is a vital part of our everyday lives. It keeps us warm and cool; allows us to produce and transport ourselves and the goods and services we buy and sell; it provides the power required to run hospitals, schools and businesses; and the means through which we are able to communicate, socialise and learn.

For Western Australia, the energy sector has played a vital role in building the economy through the provision of essential infrastructure and to a lesser extent, as a sector in and of itself, contributing around $6.2 billion to the states output and employing more than 20,000 people.

In recent times, population expansion and resource-led economic growth along with extensive deregulation and regional development as well as major industrial incidents have transformed the state’s electricity sector, from a single supplier to a structured monitored market with a number of industry players.

Challenges lie ahead for the energy sector with affordability a key concern for many West Australians. Our findings show that high energy costs impose a significant burden for many households, especially those on low incomes, with single parents, and older age single men and women more likely to be in energy poverty than other households. And there is evidence that some families are compromising on other essentials to meet rising energy costs, including food and healthcare.

Accessible, secure and affordable energy is a necessary component of any well-functioning economy. And the imperative to move to a greener source is a position that many citizens, communities and governments are taking. Western Australia is lagging behind on this front, with no clear renewable energy plan or target, despite others states taking these steps.

Investment in large-scale renewable projects are meagre in comparison to other states and territories, with most of the direct action towards reducing WA’s carbon footprint stemming from household demand and the desire to minimise electricity costs. Collectively, households are soon to become the biggest electricity provider in the state, holding more than 2,000MW of combined capacity. But the intermittent nature of Solar PV and the socio-economic gradient around accessibility, means that it will not be a complete solution to affordability and action towards ‘greening’ the state.

What is clear from this report is that the energy sector is changing rapidly globally and nationally; and that Western Australia needs a plan to navigate its way through these changes and towards a sustainable and affordable energy future. The inevitable progress towards renewable energy sources must be incorporated in future planning, so that the state is not left behind and future economic growth compromised.

v

v

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

vi

Key findings

The energy sector in the WA economy

Evolution

Total energy consumption in WA has almost doubled in the last 25 years.

Gas is the main source of energy in WA, accounting for more than 50% of WA’s net energy consumption in 2014-15.

Oil is the second most popular source of energy for WA accounting for around 40% of total consumption.

Coal and oil dominate energy consumption in the more populous Eastern States.

Economic contributions

As energy has cemented itself as a day-to-day necessity, so too has the Australian energy industry grown in significance to the country’s economy.

Between 1980 and 2016 the contribution of Australia’s electricity and gas sector has more than doubled in real terms from $10 to $25bn.

WA’s utility sector has grown to $6.2 billion in Gross Value Added, up from $2.5 billion in 1990.

In 2016, utilities were accountable for around 2.5% of total gross production in both Australia and WA.

Employment

Taking a broad definition of the energy sector by including oil and gas extraction, pipeline transport and coal mining, total employment is currently around 20,000 people.

Oil and gas extraction remains the major employer in the energy sector, employing around 10,200 people.

NSW, WA and NT have seen a consistent increase in the share of total employment stemming from the energy sector.

More than 77% of WA’s energy sector employees are located in the greater Perth region.

Total employment in the utility sector has increased substantially in the last decade, primarily in the Perth metro area.

WA Outback accounts for around 15% of total utility sector employment in WA, followed by Bunbury (4.3%) and WA Wheatbelt (3.4%).

Gas supply has become one of the major employers in the energy sector.

Most employment remains full-time, but there has been a noticeable increase in part-time employment in the last 2 years.

Technicians and trade workers make up the majority of full-time employees in the utility sector.

Electricity in WAWA’s electricity network has changed significantly over the last twenty years and has shifted from a single to multi-supplier regulated system.

In 2006, the state monopoly supplier was split into four state-owned corporations – Western Power, Horizon Power, Synergy and Verve Energy (later merging to a single entity).

Significant institutional reforms to energy market planning and regulation have taken place in WA over the last two years, including moving market regulation to the Australian Energy Market Operation in November 2015.

Sources of electricity

Since 2008-09, WA has generated more electricity every year, growing to annual generation of 38,000 Gigawatt hours.

Electricity generation from non-renewables has fallen from 97% to 93% in the last six years.

vii

vii

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Electricity generation capacity in WA

WA’s electricity generation capacity is made up of state and privately owned assets delivering power to urban and regional areas.

Western Australia’s energy network is served by a range of facilities that generate electricity through a combination of technologies.

The largest coal-fired power stations in WA make a major contribution to the state’s base load requirements.

The three state-owned coal-fired facilities at Muja, Kwinana and Collie together capable of producing 2,000MW of electricity.

WA is home to over fifty combustion, gas steam turbine or gas reciprocating power generation plants.

A number of these facilities contribute to the state’s base load generation, and can rapidly dispatch power to meet peak load demands.

The largest renewable electricity generation facilities in Western Australia are powered by wind turbines or hydro technology, with contributions from solar and biomass plants.

Generation and load

In summer, early morning energy load increases at a much slower speed than in winter.

Winter energy use is characterised by a load decrease around midday, before a sharp increase toward the end of the day.

Over time, summer consumption patterns throughout the day have flattened, which is likely to be linked to the increased prevalence of roof-top Solar PV.

Innovation in energy

Innovation is an important element of the energy sector, contributing to more efficient, affordable and greener generation.

47.3% of Australian businesses in the utility sector reported they were active innovators in 2014-15, an increase of around 10% from 2012-13 figures.

Around 20% of businesses in the utilities sector reported the reduction of environmental impacts as one of the key drivers of innovation. This compares to less than 5% from all other Australian businesses.

Businesses in the utilities sector cite government regulations as a major barrier to innovation.

100% renewables: not if…when

Global outlook

The world is moving towards renewables in preference of high carbon-emission fuels such as coal and gas, with continued price reductions in renewable sources, technological advancement and renewable energy policies driving these patterns.

For many jurisdictions renewable targets continue to be revised up rather than down as they quickly meet or exceed these.

The cost of new-build renewable technology is falling rapidly, with the levelised cost of new-build Solar PV is now a quarter of its value in 2009.

Investment in solar and wind is predicted to constitute three-quarters of the $10.2 trillion of expected global investment in new power generation technology out to 2040.

viii

Key findings (continued)

Australia

$7.3 billion in renewable projects are underway or set to go to construction in 2017.

NSW will add over $2bn, 1,170 jobs and over 1,000MW from renewable projects currently underway.

Queensland will add an extra 784MW of renewable capacity, with forward project investment valued at $1.76 billion over the next 12 mths.

Western Australia

2.1% of WA’s total energy consumption is sourced from renewables.

WA has seen electricity generation sourced from renewables increase from 2.9 to 7.1% in the six years to 2014-15.

Two-thirds of WA’s renewable electricity generation is sourced from wind compared with one-third nationally.

1 in 4 suitable WA dwellings have roof-top solar.

Mandurah is the top solar postcode in WA with over 10,000 installations.

Employment in renewable energy in Western Australia currently stands at around 1,060 full-time equivalent employees.

Western Australia lags behind other states and territories when it comes to investment in large-scale renewable projects.

The state currently has only one large-scale project in play – a 20MW solar farm at Emu Downs with a total project value of $50m.

100% renewables

The ACT has set a target of 100% renewable electricity by2020, Qld 50% by 2030 and Vic 40% by 2025. SA continues to surpass targets, currently at 57% renewables for electricity.

Countries, states, cities worldwide have met or are looking to meet a 100% renewable energy or electricity target.

Feasibility studies show that 100% renewables for the National Electricity Market and South West Interconnect System are possible and cost competitive.

Levelised cost of new-build Solar PV and wind is now cheaper than new-build coal and on-par, or in some instances cheaper than new-build combined-cycle gas.

Arguably, it is no longer a question of whether a 100% renewable future is a possibility, but more a question of how and when we get there.

Households are driving growth in renewable energy in WA, with roof-top solar PV capacity expected to reach more than 2,000MW by 2022.

Household solar PV penetration cannot solely be relied upon to move WA towards a renewable, clean energy future alone.

Large-scale renewable technology together with adequate storage options and balancing efficiencies must be included in any future renewable energy plan for the state.

Consumption and costsWA's energy consumption per capita has been among the highest among all states and territories.

On a per captia basis, WA's energy consumption is 1.8 times the national average.

NSW has the highest energy "productivity".

Tasmania's electricity consumption per capita is highest across states and territories.

WA's consumption of solar and gas produced energy was fairly constant for many years but spiked in recent years.

Energy costs in WA

Perth utility prices have remained consistently below those in all other states and territories since the start of the millennium.

The utility price gap between Perth and other capital cities has widened since the start of 2017.

Electricity prices in Perth almost doubled between 2008 and 2014.

Household expenditure

WA’s fixed supply charge tariff nearly doubled in July 2017, from 48.60c to 94.91c per day, up 95% on 2016’s supply tariff.

Household electricity costs have increased annually by more than 10% in four years, with the recent increase of 10.4% in 2017 caused by the near doubling of the fixed supply charge.

Energy costs can have a significant impost on the family budget, especially for those on low incomes.

Household expenditure on energy rises beyond 10% of total spending for those familities in the lowest 10% of the income distribution.

This compares with 3% of household spending for typical families on middle incomes and below 2% for those families with incomes in the top quarter of income distribution.

Energy cost shares have been increasing over time, especially for single parent families

Power to all peopleFor many families on low incomes, the cost of energy is significant and forces them to compromise on other expenditure items.

Energy poverty

Western Australian households rank fifth nationally in energy spending at an overall weekly average of $40.64.

Around a quarter of single parents commit at least 10.2% of their income towards energy costs, and one in ten spend at least 15.1%.

Western Australian households rank fifth overall in energy spending at an overall weekly average of $40.64.

Couples with children spend more per week on energy than other family types, at an average of $49.31 per week. Single parent families spend $37.23 on energy costs, the second highest in value terms and higher still in income share terms given the lower typical incomes for this equity group.

Increases in energy expenditure for single parent households in WA has been substantial – up 39% in real terms over ten years, and 10% over the last two years alone.

Around a quarter of single parents commit at least 10.2% of their income towards energy costs, and one in ten spend at least 15.1%.

Household’s access to solar technologies

Installations of roof-top solar PV has been increasing over time as energy costs rise and technology becomes cheaper.

Smart-metering can be used to modify energy consumption behaviours and avoid peak electricity prices.

Many households are unable to take up these cost-saving options due to issues around affordability, dwelling suitability or tenure (e.g. renting).

A very clear socio-economic gradient in household solar installations in Western Australia, with rooftop Solar PV installed in only 7.4% of suitable dwellings in areas in the lowest socio-economic decile, and 16% of suitable houses in the second lowest decile.

ix

ix

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Introduction

The wide variety of strong views on energy in Australia, and the appearance of an agenda behind many of those views, have led to confusion about what the future really holds for both energy consumers and suppliers. There are many emerging technologies from renewables and ‘smart’ meters to ‘smart’ homes, grids and cities yet the lack of clear policy direction means no one can really say where the energy industry will go in Australia or how we will get there. Australians have an appetite to grasp new technologies with solar panels now installed in 1.5 million homes. Yet our network was designed for large scale generation and transmission, and in its current form could be limiting the willingness of consumers to adopt other new technologies.

Western Australia is often left out of the national conversation about the future of energy because our system has developed in isolation from the eastern states. The South West Interconnected System of Western Australia (SWIS) is independent of the eastern states’ so called National Electricity Market (NEM) yet WA is increasingly looking to adopt practices similar to the east coast. But is this the right choice for WA given our circumstances and will this enable Western Australians to benefit from new emerging technologies?

What do recent developments in energy technology mean for the future? And what is holding households and businesses back from taking up these opportunities to improve how we use and generate energy? Are the rules set correctly or are vested interests getting in the way? Or is it simply that the industry is waiting for leadership, for certainty, or shifts in policy?

This is the second Focus on Industry report by the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre. Following the initial report on agribusiness, our researchers believe that the energy industry in WA is on the cusp of a tipping point that could revolutionise how energy is consumed and generated, requiring an in-depth look to see if WA is ready for this potential transformation.

This report asks if WA is positioned to take advantage of advances in energy technology that are yet to be incorporated into energy markets. In doing so, we discuss the state of play in energy and where WA sits in comparison with the eastern states. We consider how our natural endowments affect our energy choices, and how well the State is positioned to move to a renewable energy supply. The report highlights the key challenges, risks and policy issues requiring attention to ensure that WA’s energy system gets power to the people at the right time and right place, at a price that is no more than necessary and using technologies that will power us well into the future.

x

The energy sectorin the WA economy

2

The evolution of the energy sector in WA

An inseparable element of the industrial revolution, and the economic development that ensued, was the capability of producing and controlling energy as an input of production. Without a doubt, the energy sources we use have changed quite significantly since, but economies still rely on energy as a primary input. In the centuries following the industrial revolution, energy has moved from being primarily a production input to an economic necessity; to the extent that changes in its prices can determine a country’s production and development levels.

An evolution of production processes has changed our definition of energy. In today’s world, energy is perceived to be a system of several methods of energy production, distribution and consumption, rather than one input.

Australia in general, and WA specifically, is blessed with ample energy endowments. The combination of these sources creates a portfolio of energy resources for the West Australian economy to consume. What becomes apparent, is that over the years the patterns of energy consumption have changed considerably in WA. As shown in Figure 1, total energy consumption in WA has almost doubled in last 25 years, with the combination of its sources transforming even more dramatically. In 1990-91, the share of consumption of natural gas and petroleum products were almost equal, but by 2014-15 natural gas was WA’s highest source of energy, with more than 50 per cent of the State’s energy coming from natural gas.

Figure 1 WA consumption by fuel type

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

Tota

l ann

ual e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n (P

J)

Coal Electricity Petroleum products Natural gas Solar energy Liquid/gas biofuels Wood/ wood waste

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table D5.

3

3

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Comparing WA with other states and territories provides another perspective of the changing energy make-up within Australia. As shown in Figure 2, Australia’s use of coal has shrunk in all states and territories since 2008-09, with some indicating larger reduction than others. NSW, for example, produced almost half of its energy by coal in 2008-09, however by 2014-15 that number had dropped to 39.8 per cent, a reduction of almost 10 percentage points. Reductions in the share of coal in net energy consumption has given place to an increase in the use of renewables.

Only the Northern Territory has a lower uptake of renewable energy that Western Australia. Between 2008-09 and 2014-15, WA, NT and Victoria's share of renewables is shown to be fairly constant. While renewables only accounted for less than 5 per cent of net energy consumption in WA by 2014-15, Tasmania was leading the charge with around 40 per cent of its energy coming from renewables.

Oil as a source of net energy consumption has been volatile across all states and territories, but the Northern Territory remains the highest consumer of the black gold, with around 60 per cent of the Territory’s energy coming from oil in 2008-09 and 2011-12. This dropped to just below 50 per cent in 2014-15.

Oil is the second most popular source of energy for WA, comprising 35 per cent to 40 per cent of the State’s energy consumption. Gas is also popular in the NT, but captures a relatively small share in NSW and Tasmania. However the similarities between NSW and Tasmania stop there, with coal being the main source of energy in NSW, whereas renewables and oil share the highest proportions in Tasmania.

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT AUS

Figure 2 Net energy consumption by fuel type: states and territories

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Shar

e of

net

ene

rgy

cons

upti

on, b

y ty

pe (%

)

Coal Oil Gas Renewables

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table C1.

The composition of net energy consumption has been relatively constant in WA in recent times, something unique in comparison to the other states and territories. In fact, in all other jurisdictions, the share of renewables has increased, with South Australia and Tasmania making the most progress.

Gas is the main source of energy in WA, accounting for more than 50 per cent of WA’s net energy consumption in 2014-15.

As energy has cemented itself as a day-to-day necessity, so too has the Australian energy industry grown in significance to the country’s economy. As illustrated in Figure 3, electricity and gas contributed less than $10 billion to the Australian economy before 1980. Over the next 40 years, the contribution of electricity and gas had more than doubled, measuring at more than $25 billion in 2016.

Despite the general upward trend in the contribution of electricity and gas to the Australian economy, the yearly rate of growth has been quite different. From 1976 to the start of the 1990s there was rapid growth, which started to slow in the 1990s and early 2000s. After another jump in 2008, the contribution to the Australian economy has remained relatively steady with some minor variations from 2013 to 2015.

Figure 3 Value of electricity and gas utilities to the Australian economy

30,000

25,000

20,000

15,000

10,000

5,000

0

1976

1980

1984

1988

1992

1996

2000

2004

2008

2012

2016

$ m

illio

n

Electricty Gas

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no.5204.0.

Looking at the disaggregation of electricity and gas’ contribution to the economy also reveals an interesting pattern. Electricity overwhelmingly dominates the contribution value, however the small contribution of gas has been increasing since 1976, with rapid growth from 1980s to the turn of the 21st century. The contribution of gas to the economy has been steady in the past decade and currently sits at 7 per cent of the industry’s economic contribution. Overall, electricity plays a significant role in the Australian economy and its contribution has changed drastically over the past few decades.

4

Contributions to the WA economy

Figure 4 Gross value added of electricity, gas, water and waste services to WA economy

7,000

6,000

5,000

4,000

3,000

2,000

1,000

0

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

$ m

illio

n

Gross Value Added

Source: BANKWEST CURTIN ECONOMICS CENTRE | ABS Cat no.5220.0

Focusing on WA, Figure 4 shows the gross value added of the entire utility sector (electricity, gas, water and waste services) to WA’s economy. In 2016, the WA utility sector was worth $6.2 billion to the economy, continuously exceeding $5 billion since 2011.

Table 1 Composition of the WA economy – gross value added by sector

Industry Jun 1996 Jun 2006 Jun 2016$m % $m % $m %

Agriculture, forestry and fishing 3,244 12 3.7 5,277 10 3.9 5,261 14 2.3Mining 22,710 1 25.9 29,324 1 21.7 69,009 1 30.6Manufacturing 5,792 4 6.6 9,322 4 6.9 12,569 4 5.6Electricity, gas, water and waste services 3,275 11 3.7 4,077 14 3.0 6,259 13 2.8Construction 6,715 2 7.7 16,237 2 12.0 30,524 2 13.5Wholesale trade 2,202 15 2.5 4,900 13 3.6 6,489 12 2.9Retail trade 3,732 10 4.3 6,042 9 4.5 8,175 9 3.6Accommodation and food services 1,732 16 2.0 2,814 16 2.1 3,754 16 1.7Transport, postal and warehousing 6,370 3 7.3 9,518 3 7.0 12,319 5 5.5Information media and telecommunications 1,272 17 1.5 2,258 18 1.7 3,616 17 1.6

Financial and insurance services 4,356 8 5.0 6,140 8 4.5 9,982 7 4.4Rental, hiring and real estate services 2,691 13 3.1 2,955 15 2.2 4,960 15 2.2Professional, scientific and technical services 4,548 7 5.2 8,164 6 6.0 11,934 6 5.3

Administrative and support services 2,632 14 3.0 5,059 12 3.7 7,086 11 3.1Public administration and safety 4,020 9 4.6 5,181 11 3.8 7,875 10 3.5Education and training 5,184 6 5.9 6,425 7 4.8 8,296 8 3.7

Health care and social assistance 5,356 5 6.1 8,246 5 6.1 13,268 3 5.9

Arts and recreation services 535 19 0.6 795 19 0.6 1,151 19 0.5

Other services 1,206 18 1.4 2,311 17 1.7 3,245 18 1.4

Ownership of dwellings 10,566 14,769 19,428 Taxes less subsidies on products 7,196 8,862 10,249 Gross state product: Chain volume measures

102,301 100 156,375 100 255,214 100

Note: For Gross value added chain volume measures are used. Statistical discrepancy omitted from table.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | BCEC analysis using ABS Cat no 5220.0

5

5

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

WA's utility sector is currently valued at $6.2bn.

Table 1 shows the economic value, typically measured as gross value added, of the sectors that make up the WA economy. Unsurprisingly, Mining constitutes almost a quarter of to the value of WA’s economy, with Construction coming in second. At the other end of the spectrum, Arts and recreation services and Other services contribute the least gross value added to the WA economy. We can also see that the utility sector (Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste services) is not far from the bottom of the ranking in terms of economic contribution, and comes in as the 13th largest sector as at June 2016.

Figure 5 Contributions of electricity, gas, water and waste services to WA and Australian economy

4.5

4.0

3.5

3.0

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0

1990

1992

1994

1996

1998

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

Shar

e of

Tot

al G

ross

Pro

duct

ion

(%)

Western Australia Australia

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no.5220.0

In Figure 5, a comparison is made between the contributions that the utility sector makes to WA and Australia’s gross production. In 1990, the utility sector accounted for 3.3 per cent of WA’s economy, compared to 3.9 per cent of Australia’s economy. These ratios have since decreased in both jurisdictions, but at different rates, and the sector’s State contribution is now more representative of the national sector’s contribution.

6

WA’s utility sector has grown by $3.5 billion in Gross Value Added (GVA), up from $2.5 billion in 1990.

In 2016, utilities were accountable for around 2.5 per cent of total gross production in both Australia and WA.

Figure 6 Share of Gross Value Added from selected industries

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

2000

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Per c

ent

of t

otal

gro

ss v

alue

add

ed

Electricity, gas, water and waste services Mining Manufacturing Construction All other Services

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no.5220.0

In Figure 6, we hone in on a few industries, to draw clearer comparisons of the contribution the utility sector makes to WA’s economy. The total gross value added contribution these industries make to WA’s economy has been almost constant over the past 25 years. Mining and Construction have increased moderately in the last few years, resulting in a reduction in the contribution share of all other services. The contribution share of WA’s utility sector has been steady since 1990, accounting for less than 5 per cent of total gross value added.

7

7

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Employment in energy

To discuss employment in energy sector, we follow the Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS 2009) to broaden the definition of energy to include Oil and gas extraction, Pipeline transport and Coal mining. Figure 7 shows the employment share of these sub-sectors in WA’s economy. According to latest data, around half of the employment generated by the energy industry stems from Oil and gas extraction (48.5%), followed by Gas and Electricity supply each with 18 per cent of the share. With an equal share of 5.7 per cent of total employment, Electricity generation and Electricity distribution round out the top five employment sub-sectors. Electricity transmission (0.01%) and Coal mining (1.1%) contributed the smallest share in May 2017.

Employment, May 2017

0%

Oil and Gas Extraction

Gas Supply

Electricity Supply nfd

Electricity Generation

Electricity Distribution

Electricity Market Operation

Pipeline and Other Transport

Coal Mining

49%

18%

6%

18%

6%

1%1%

1%

Figure 7 Employment shares by WA energy sub-sector: broad employment definitions

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | BCEC analysis using ABS cat no 6291.0

In Figure 8, the trend of total employment in WA energy sector can be seen. From a starting point of 15,700 people in November 2011, the total number of persons employed in the sector peaked in November 2013 at around 24,000 people. This was followed by a slight reduction in late 2014, and total employment since has remained above 20,000 people.

The Gas supply sub-sector has seen growth in recent years, and now employs 3,900 people. On the other hand, Coal mining has seen a significant drop in employment, from around 1,500 people in 2011 to just 200 people in May 2017.

8

Oil and gas extraction remains the major employer in the energy sector, employing 10,200 people.

Figure 8 Patterns of employment across WA energy sub-sectors: 2011 to 2016

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Feb

2011

Jul 2

011

Dec

201

1

May

201

2

Oct

201

2

Mar

201

3

Aug

2013

Jan

2014

Jun

2014

Nov

201

4

Apr 2

015

Sep

2015

Feb

2016

Jul 2

016

Dec

201

6

May

201

7

Thou

sand

, Peo

ple

Electricity Generation Electricity Transmission Electricity Distribution Electricity Market Operation Gas Supply Coal Mining Electricity Supply nfd Oil and Gas Extraction Pipeline and Other Transport

Note: The values before 2011 are not presented as there was re-catrogorixzation of indusries in 2009. Nfd stands for Not Further Defined.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | BCEC analysis using ABS Cat no 6291.0

But how does WA compare with other states and territories. Figure 9 shows this comparison, with Queensland recording the highest employment in the sector in 2012, equivalent to 53,000 people. This shows a considerable increase from a base of 23,200 people in 2007. ACT reports the smallest employment contribution with around 1,000 people employed in the energy sector for the last five years. In Victoria and WA, the number of people employed in the sector has grown steadily in the decade from 2007 to 2017. Tasmania shows a constant number of employed people in the sector, hovering around 2,500 people, however NSW and Qld report very different trends. NSW’s sector grew substantially in employment from 2007 to 2012, but has remained constant since. In Qld, after a large increase to 53,000 people in 2012, the number employed in the sector has shrunk to 42,000 in 2017. The Northern Territory follows a different trend again, with the number employed increasing slightly from 800 people in 2007 to 2,000 people in 2017.

9

9

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT ACT

Figure 9 Total employment in energy sector (alternative definition), by state: 2007 to 2017

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Thou

sand

per

sons

May 2007 May 2012 May 2017

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no 6291.0

26.9

443

.16

43.2

5

13.6

8 17.4

5 21.0

1

23.2

052

.87

42.0

9

5.38 7.44

6.11 1

2.22

17.2

521

.12

2.81

0.76

0.67

2.87

1.29

1.03

2.33

2.05

0.80

As mentioned above, there are currently about 21,000 people working in the energy sector in WA. To compare the share of WA’s energy sector employment with other states and territories, Figure 10 presents each state’s share of national energy sector employment in 2007 and 2017. With about one third of the country’s energy sector employment, NSW has the biggest share across states and territories at around 31 per cent. Qld comes in second with just above 30 per cent of national sector employment in 2017, increasing its share from 27 per cent in 2007. Over the past 10 years, WA’s share of national energy employment has also increased from 14.3 per cent to 15.2 per cent. In 2017, Vic, SA, Tas and ACT recorded a smaller share of national energy employment in comparison to their 2007 figures, with Tas and SA dropping the most, around 2 per cent each.

10

0.8%0.9%3.3%

May 2007

NSW

Vic

QLD

SA

WA

Tas

NT

ACT

31.4%

27.1%

14.3%

6.3%

Figure 10 WA’s share of national energy employment, 2007 and 2017

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | BCEC analysis using ABS cat no 6291.0

16%

0.6%1.5%1.7%

May 2017

31.2%

30.3%

15.2%

4.4%

15.1%

In Figure 10, we compared state and territory shares of national energy sector employment, but Figure 11 compares the sector’s contribution to each state and territory’s total employment. In Vic, Qld, SA and ACT, the share of total employment from the energy sector increased between 2007 and 2012, but shrunk in the 5 year period leading to 2017.

In 2017, the ACT had the lowest share of total employment from the energy sector, in comparison to other states. NSW and SA come in second with a 0.7 per cent share and Qld currently has the largest share with around 2 per cent of its local labour market coming from energy. WA’s share of energy associated employment has grown steadily from 1.1 per cent in 2007, to 1.4 per cent in 2012 and now makes up 1.6 per cent of total employment.

ACTNSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT

Figure 11 Energy employment as a share of total employment: by state/territory, 2007 to 2017

2.5

2.0

1.5

1.0

0.5

0

Shar

e of

sta

te/t

errit

iry's

tot

al e

mpl

oym

ent

(%)

May 2007 May 2012 May 2017

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no 6291.0

0.8

1.2

1.1

0.5 0.

6 0.7

1.1

2.3

1.8

0.7

0.9

0.7

1.1

1.4

1.6

1.3

0.7

0.3

1.2

1.1

0.5

1.0

1.5

0.4

11

11

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

NSW, WA and NT have seen a consistent increase in the share of total employment coming from the energy sector.

To illustrate the decomposition of the utility sector’s labour market across WA's regions, Figure 12 panel (a), looks at the total utility sector employment in each WA region and in panel (b) we compare the share of each region from the State’s total employment. These labour market regions are derived using the ABS Statistical Areas Level 4 (SA4) classification. This divides WA into Greater Perth (equivalent to Perth and Peel), Bunbury (covering the South West), WA Wheatbelt (covering the Wheatbelt and Great Southern regions) and WA Outback (covering all other WA regions).

WA Outback accounts for around 15 per cent of total sector related employment in WA, followed by Bunbury (4.3%) and WA Wheatbelt (3.4%).

The total number of people employed in the utility sector in WA spiked in the period between 2014 and 2015. However, latest figures suggest that in 2017 the total number employed in WA’s utility sector is equal to its relevant figures in 2012, around 16,000 people.

When we look at the regional trends shown in panel (b), we see that despite a slight fluctuation in recent years, the metro region (i.e. Greater Perth) has remained the highest employment region in WA’s utility sector, around 70 per cent. However, another interesting pattern is observable; in the recent years, the share of Bunbury’s employment has decreased, while there has been a slight increase in WA Outback’s employment share figures.

Figure 12 WA utility’s employment as a share of total employment: by region, 2001 to 2017

25

20

15

10

5

0

(a) Total employment

Tota

l Em

ploy

men

t, (0

00)

Greater Perth Bunbury Western Australia - Outback Western Australia - Wheat Belt

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

(b) Share of employed working in energy (%)

Shar

e of

Em

ploy

ed w

orki

ng in

Ele

ctric

ity,

ga

s, w

ater

and

was

te s

ervi

ces

Greater Perth Bunbury Western Australia - Outback Western Australia - Wheat Belt

2001

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Note: Series are calculated using five quarters average.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no 6291.0.

12

More than 77 per cent of WA’s energy sector employees are located in the greater Perth region.

Total employment in the utility sector has increased greatly in last decade, primarily in the Perth metro area.

To examine the size of WA energy sector employment compared to national trends, in Figure 13, panel (a) we plot WA and national levels of energy related employment in contrast with the WA share of energy employment from total. In Figure 13, the bar chart shows WA's share from the national workforce and lines represent the number of persons employed. Employment in the energy sector has grown both in WA and nationally, however the trend for WA has been much more volatile, especially in the period from 2012 to 2014. Since 2015, the trend of total employment in WA has been steady, with only some minor variations.

Figure 13 WA’s total employment by energy sub-components, 2001 to 2017

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

(a) Total employment and national share (%)

WA

Pers

ons

AUS

x 10

Per

sons

WA

Shar

e of

nat

ioan

l Wor

kfor

ce

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

WA Share of National Workforce Western Australia Australia

Note: Series are calculated using five quarters average.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat no 6291.0.

Electricity Supply nfd Electricity Generation Electricity Transmission Electricity Distribution Electricity Market Operation Gas Supply Oil and Gas Extraction Coal Mining Pipeline and Other Transport

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

(b) Components of WA energy employment

Thou

sand

, (00

0)

2000

2002

2004

2006

2008

2010

2012

2014

2016

In panel (b) of Figure 13, we show the different sub-sectors of the WA energy sector. Oil and gas extraction has had the highest share of employment constantly, followed by Gas supply. Employment in both Electricity transmission and Electricity generation have diminished over the past 16 years. In past decades, Gas supply has recorded an increase in total employment in WA, and has become one of the major employers in the energy sector. Another sub-sector with a dramatic change is Electricity distribution. Electricity distribution was among the sub-sectors with the most significant employment contribution in WA in the years before 2006, but employment in this sub-sector has dropped since.

Turning to Figure 14, we plot the number of people employed in the sector by their employment status to explore WA’s pattern of employment in the energy sector in more detail. Prior to 2003, the total number employed in WA’s energy sector was fairly constant, with the majority of people employed full-time. However, from 2003 employment in WA’s energy sector increased drastically from around 5,000 in 2002 to around 25,000 in 2012 and 2013.

13

13

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Most employment remains full-time, but there has been a noticeable increase in part-time employment in last 2 years.

Figure 14 Employment by type in the energy sector: WA, 1986 to 2017

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

1985

1987

1989

1991

1993

1995

1997

1999

2001

2003

2005

2007

2009

2011

2013

2015

Thou

sand

s Pe

rson

s

Thou

sand

s Pe

rson

s, P

art-

tim

e

Employment Part-time (RHS) Employment total Employment Full-time

Notes: Series are calculated using five quarters average.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS cat no 6291.0.

Figure 15 Full-time and part-time employment, WA utility sector: by occupation, 1987 to 2017

Notes: Series are calculated using five quarters average.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS cat no 6291.0.

(a) Full-time employed (‘000s)

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Empl

oym

ent

full-

tim

e (‘0

00)

Managers Professionals Technicians and Trade Workers Community and Personal Service Workers Clerical and Administrative Workers Machinery Operators and Drivers Labourers

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

200

020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

17

(b) Part-time employed (‘000s)

7

6

5

4

3

2

1

0

Empl

oym

ent

part

-tim

e (‘0

00)

Managers Professionals Technicians and Trade Workers Clerical and Administrative Workers Machinery Operators and Drivers Labourers

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

200

020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

17

(c) Share of part-time employment (%)

25

20

15

10

5

0

Shar

e of

par

t-ti

me

empl

oym

ent,

(%)

Managers Professionals Technicians and Trade Workers Clerical and Administrative Workers Machinery Operators and Drivers Labourers

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

200

020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

17

(d) Total monthly hours worked, all jobs (‘000s)

2,000

1,800

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0Num

ber o

f hou

rs w

orke

d al

l job

s, (0

00)

Managers Professionals Technicians and Trade Workers Clerical and Administrative Workers Machinery Operators and Drivers Labourers

1987

1988

1989

1990

1991

1992

1993

1994

1995

1996

1997

1998

1999

200

020

0120

0220

0320

0420

0520

0620

0720

0820

0920

1020

1120

1220

1320

1420

1520

1620

17

14

To clarify the decomposition of WA’s energy sector labour market, Figure 15 displays some of the main indicators of labour market performance, by occupation. In panel (a) we show total full-time employment in WA.

However, from a starting point of more than 50,000 full-time technicians in 1987, the category recorded a downward trend until 2000, before starting a slow increase again to 2017. According to the latest data, total full-time employment sits around 30,000 Technicians and trade workers in WA’s utility sector, much less than the peak in the 1980s.

Clerical and administrative workers have also had a marginal increase in past 30 years, reaching just above 20,000 full-time employees in 2017. The number of full-time Managers also almost doubled in this period. The only occupation that has decreased in full-time employment in the utility sector is Labourers, with currently represent just under 10,000 of WA’s full-time energy sector employees.

In panel (b), the same analysis is shown for part-time employment. While the majority of occupations have had significant changes since 2008, part-time employment in clerical jobs has been growing steadily since the 1980s and there are now around 4,000 part-time Clerk and administrative staff in WA utility sector. This is followed by Professionals with just under 2,000 part-time employees.

To illustrate the extent of change among occupations over the years, in panel (c) the share of part-time employment is presented. Clerical and administrative workers and Labourers currently record the highest share of part-time employment, at 15.3 per cent and 13.5 per cent respectively. The lowest share of part time employment belongs to Technicians and trade workers at 2.3 per cent. Latest figures suggest the share of part-time employment of Managers, Professionals and Machinery operators is equal, and around 5 per cent.

In WA’s utility sector, the share of full-time employment is significant across many occupations and therefore total monthly hours worked in this industry follow a similar pattern (panel (d)). Technicians and trade workers worked the most, and Labourers the least, with 1,200 and 400 hours of work per month respectively. According to latest data, total hours worked in other occupations are relatively even, around 800 hours per month.

15

15

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Technicians and trade workers make up the majority of full-time employees in the utility sector.

Electricityin WA

Introduction

WA’s electricity network has changed significantly over the last twenty years. Population expansion, resource-led economic growth, extensive deregulation and regional development – as well as major industrial incidents at home and abroad - have transformed the state’s electricity sector from a single supplier to a structured and monitored market with a number of industry players.

The current network has its origins in the State Energy Commission of Western Australia, a state monopoly which was split in 1995 into two state-owned corporations supplying gas (AlintaGas) and electricity (the Western Power Corporation, later Western Power). AlintaGas, later Alinta, was privatised in 2000, and as part of a series of reforms to WA’s electricity sector in 2006, Western Power was split into four state-owned corporations:

• Western Power - the network corporation responsible for the maintenance and operation of the physical electricity network infrastructure covering metropolitan Perth and the South West Interconnected System (SWIS);

• Horizon Power - the power corporation responsible for electricity generation, distribution and retail services in the north and regional areas of WA through the North West Interconnected System (NWIS), as well as maintenance of network infrastructure;

• Synergy - the WA energy retailer responsible for electricity account management, sales, marketing and customer billing to residential and business customers in Perth and the South West Interconnected System (SWIS); and

• Verve Energy - the state-owned corporation responsible for electricity generation serving Perth and the South West Interconnected System (SWIS)

Verve Energy and Synergy were merged into a single entity, also called Synergy, from 1 January 2014 as part of a broader review of the WA Energy Market (WEM) motivated by high state subsidies and a desire to control rising electricity prices.

Regulatory frameworkThe last two years have seen significant institutional reforms to energy market planning and regulation in Western Australia. Previously, the state’s energy planning and regulation processes were overseen exclusively by WA regulatory and industry bodies including the Independent Market Operator (IMO), the original WA market planning and regulation entity, and Western Power.

From November 2015, the market operation and rules change functions of IMO relating to the wholesale electricity market were progressively handed over to the national Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO). Shortly thereafter, on 1 July 2016, AEMO was given additional responsibilities for the systems management function previously overseen by Western Power1. Compliance monitoring also moved from IMO to WA’s Economic Regulation Authority (ERA) on the same date.

18

1 With the move also serving, prospectively, to protect against perceptions of conflict of interest under any future scenario in which Western Power became privatised.

Sources of electricity

19

19

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The pattern of non-renewable electricity generation in WA has not been evenly distributed. From 2010-11, electricity generation from Black coal decreased from 32.4 per cent to 28.0 per cent, whereas Natural gas generated electricity increased from 52.5 per cent in 2008-09 to 53.6 per cent in 2014-15 (Table 2).

The pattern of change among renewables is also different. Among the several renewable sources, the share of Biogas in electricity generation in WA has been fixed at around 0.3 per cent for the past few years, however the share of Solar PV in electricity generation has had a steady growth, from 0.1 per cent in 2008-09 to 1.8 per cent in 2014-15. The share of WA electricity generation from wind power has almost doubled over the same period, from 2.5 per cent in 2008-09 to 4.4 per cent in 2014-15.

Non-renewables remain a major source of WA’s electricity, indeed more than 92 per cent of WA's electricity generated in 2014-15 was from non-renewables (Table 2). Nevertheless, we can see a noticeable increase in the share of renewables.

Table 2 shows the trends and sources of electricity generation in WA. Since 2008-09, WA has generated more electricity every year, growing to a staggering level of 38,000 Gigawatt hours. While this increase is not unexpected, the decomposition of its sources provides interesting insights.

Electricity generation from non-renewable sources has increased from 27,000 GWh in 2008-09 to 38,000 GWh in 2014-15. However, the share of non-renewables in total electricity generation has dropped from 97 per cent in 2008-09 to 93 per cent in 2014-15. Over this same time, both the share and total electricity generation from renewables has grown, from just above 800 GWh in 2008-09, to 2,700 GWh in 2014-15.

Electricity generation from non-renewables has fallen from 97 per cent to 93 per cent in the last six years.

Table 2 Electricity generation in WA, by source: 2008-09 to 2014-15

2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh GWh

Non-renewable fuels Black coal 8,738 9,612 10,352 10,783 10,277 10,885 10,523 Natural gas 14,556 16,006 18,116 17,538 17,645 20,880 20,146 Oil products 1,464 1,373 1,414 1,171 2,045 2,486 4,224 Other a 2,153 1,018 1,029 1,072 1,856 0 0 Total non-renewable 26,912 28,010 30,911 30,565 31,823 34,252 34,893 Renewable fuels Biogas 120 121 112 126 108 124 127 Wind 675 664 719 1,279 1,300 1,579 1,643

Hydro na na na na 221 205 206

Solar PV 19 58 198 331.4 450 555 683 Total renewable 813 843 1,029 1735.8 2,079 2,464 2,660

Total 27,725 28,852 31,940 32,301 33,902 36,715 37,553 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15

% % % % % % %

Non-renewable fuels

Black coal 31.5 33.3 32.4 33.4 30.3 29.6 28.0

Natural gas 52.5 55.5 56.7 54.3 52.0 56.9 53.6

Oil products 5.3 4.8 4.4 3.6 6.0 6.8 11.2 Other a 7.8 3.5 3.2 3.3 5.5 0.0 0.0Total non-renewable 97.1 97.1 96.8 94.6 93.9 93.3 92.9Renewable fuels Biogas 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.4 0.3 0.3 0.3 Wind 2.4 2.3 2.3 4.0 3.8 4.3 4.4 Hydro 0.7 0.6 0.5 Solar PV 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8Total renewable 2.9 2.9 3.2 5.4 6.1 6.7 7.1

Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O.

20

Figure 16 WA electricity generation capacity by source

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Various sources.

TOTAL MW - coal fired

MujaKwinana

BluewatersCollie

Worsley Alumina Power Station

0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1,000 1,100 1,200 1,300 1,400

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 7,000 8,000 9,000 10,000 11,000 12,000 13,000 14,000

Coal fired power stations Total MW - coal fired

Maximum capacity (MW)

Total MW capacity

2,557

1,094640

416300

107

TOTAL MW - gas fired

Pinjar

Cape Preston

Neerabup

Kwinana - NewGen[1]

Pinjarra Alumina Refinery, Alcoa Australia / AGL

Kemerton (Transfield)

Cockburn

Port Hedland

Newman

Paraburdoo (Pilbara Iron)

Worsley Alumina Power Station

Kwinana - BP Refining

Dampier

Mungarra

Parkeston

Cape Lambert (Pilbara Iron)

Murrin Murrin (Minara Resources)

Mount Keith

Leinster

Kalgoorlie

Kambalda

Kwinana - Tiwest

Esperance (Burns and Roe Worley)

Cawse

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000

Gas turbine power stations Total MW - gas fired

Maximum capacity (MW)

Total MW capacity

3,981

576

450

330

320

280

260

240

175

170

155

120

120

120

112

110

105

76

67

42

42

42

36

33

21

21

21

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 16 WA electricity generation capacity by source (continued)

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Various sources.

TOTAL MW - steam turbine gas

Telfer Gold Mine, Newcrest Mining

Wagerup Alumina Refinery, Alcoa Australia

Pinjarra Alumina Refinery, Alcoa Australia

Kwinana Alumina Refinery, Alcoa Australia

Capel (Iluka Resources)

TOTAL MW - reciprocating gas

Plutonic (Billabong Gold)

Carnarvon

Jundee (Northern Star Ltd)

Windimurra

Wodgina Tantalum Mine

Tamala Park

Canning Vale

Red Hill

South Cardup

Leonora

Henderson (Wattleup)

Kelvin Road, Gosnells

Mount Magnet

Kalamunda

Woodman Point

Millar Road, Rockingham

Dongara

Atlas (Mirrabooka)

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Total MW capacity

0 50 100 150 200 250

Other gas power stations Total MW - steam turbine gas

Maximum capacity (MW)

409

135

98

95

75

6.5

99

1.1

1.6

1.6

1.8

1.9

1.9

2.0

2.1

3.2

3.3

3.7

4.0

4.7

8.8

13.0

13.2

15.3

16.0

TOTAL MW - wind

Collgar Wind FarmWalkaway Wind Farm

Emu DownsAlbany

Nine Mile BeachTen Mile Lagoon

TOTAL MW - Solar/hydro/biogas

Ord River HydroGreenough River Solar Farm

Ord Sugar Mill, KununurraWellington Dam

Renewable power stations Total MW - Renewable power

Maximum capacity (MW)

Total MW capacity

2,557

107

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

0 50 100 150 200 250

402

20690

7922

48

3.6

2.0

3010

6.02.0

22

Electricity generation capacity in WAThe state’s electricity generation capacity is made up of a combination of state-owned and privately-owned assets delivering power to urban and regional WA, serving residential households, business customers, as well as the state’s major industries.

Western Australia’s energy network is served by a range of facilities that generate electricity through a combination of technologies.

The breadth, scale and capacities of WA’s electricity generating assets are explored in Figure 16. Power stations are clustered according to principal fuel and generation method, from some of the state’s largest coal-fired power stations in the top panel of Figure 16, to the broad inventory of gas combustion, gas steam turbine and reciprocating gas power stations in the two middle panels. Finally, the lower panel itemises some of the state’s main renewable power station ventures driven either by wind, solar power or biogas.

• The largest coal-fired power stations in WA make a major contribution to the state’s base load requirements, with the three state-owned coal-fired facilities at Muja, Kwinana and Collie together capable of producing 2,000MW of electricity.

• The State is also home to over fifty combustion, gas steam turbine or gas reciprocating power generation plants. A number of these facilities contribute to the state’s base load generation, and can rapidly dispatch power to meet peak load demands.

• Some, including large gas combustion plants at Pinjar, Cockburn and Mungarra at a combined capacity of 928MW, are state-owned facilities, but many are privately-owned and generate power by contract to the SWIS and NWIS, or directly to large production facilities in the resources, mining and refining sectors.

• The largest renewable electricity generation facilities in Western Australia are powered by wind turbines or hydro technology, with contributions from solar and biomass plants.

Two of Western Australia’s three power stations with the largest electricity generating capacity are coal-fired (Muja, with a rating of 1096MW; and Kwinana, at 640MW). The third largest power station, Pinjar is a gas combustion turbine facility powered by natural gas and diesel, with a 576MW rating. All three are owned by Synergy, along with Collie (coal-fired, at 300MW), Cockburn and Mungarra (both gas combustion stations, at 240MW and 112MW respectively).

Many of the major power stations delivering electricity to regional Western Australia are gas-fired. The three largest of these - Pinjarra, Port Hedland and Newman at 280MW, 175MW and 170MW respectively - are run by Alinta, and serve regional areas through the North West Interconnected System (NWIS).

Wind generation facilities in the state have a combined electricity generating capacity of 400MW. Collgar, Walkaway and Emu Downs wind farms have the largest capacities, at 206MW, 90MW and 79MW respectively. The Ord River Hydro plant can deliver up to 30MW, while Greenough River is currently the state’s only significant solar farm, with a 10MW capacity from 150,000 solar panels.

23

23

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Generation and load

Not only has WA’s combination of resources used for electricity generation changed, there has also been a considerable shift in the load and consumption pattern of electricity in WA. There are two aspects of this difference. The first regards the variation in electricity consumption across different days (or seasons) in a given period, and the second is the variation and changes in the pattern of consumption across time.

To show the variation of consumption in a given time, in Figure 17, we plotted the operational electricity load in WA on a typical winter and summer day. The horizontal axis represents a 24 hour period and the vertical axis shows the electricity load in Megawatts per hour (MWh). December to February are considered summer and June to August winter. Overlaying the duration of sunlight in summer and winter with electricity operation load helps us to understand the pattern.

The first observation from the graph is to identify the different patterns of load on a summer and winter day. On a typical summer day, the early morning operation load increases at a much slower speed than on a winter day. But in winter, the load decreases around midday and increases toward the end of the day. While the different patterns of operation load are associated with differences in the behaviours and actions of consumers during summer and winter, the changes in the rate of growth from the lowest load point to the highest is something worth noting.

Looking at the red coloured line (summer operational load) alongside the orange shaded area (summer sunlight), it is possible to relate solar panel generated electricity to a smoother trend (or slower growth) in operation load. On a summer day, the duration of sunlight is longer and therefore the load variation is much less volatile than on a winter day. Solar panels and other solar generated electricity can be associated with the smoother operational load trend during summer.

Figure 17 Summer and winter electricity load in WA: 2016, by time of day

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

0:00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

MW

\h o

f ope

rati

onal

ele

ctric

ity

load

Summer Sun Light Winter Sun Light 2016 Winter 2016 Summer

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | AEMO Market Data

24

Figure 18 Comparison of summer and winter electricity loads in WA: 2007 to 2016

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | AEMO Market Data

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

0:00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

MW

\h

Summer Sun Light 2003 2007 2010 2016

(a) Summer

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

0:00

1:00

2:00

3:00

4:00

5:00

6:00

7:00

8:00

9:00

10:0

0

11:0

0

12:0

0

13:0

0

14:0

0

15:0

0

16:0

0

17:0

0

18:0

0

19:0

0

20:0

0

21:0

0

22:0

0

23:0

0

MW

\h

Winter Sun Light 2007 2010 2013 2016

(b) Winter

The general pattern of electricity consumption or operation load in WA has traditionally been similar across winter and summer days. However, looking at the historical summer consumption pattern, panel (a) of Figure 18 suggests that while the daily total load is higher in recent years, the trend has been flattened across the day. In winter though, there is a hike in operation load once the sun sets, and extent of this hike has increased in recent years. This could also potentially be linked to the prevalence of solar panels - with the sun setting and a general absence of energy storage, households can not use their solar panel generated electricity and they quickly move to using conventional electricity grids. So even though operational load from these households has been lower during the day (i.e. while the sun is shining), there is a faster rate at which maximum operational load is reached in the evening.

25

25

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Innovation

Considering the importance of the energy sector to Australia’s and WA’s economy, innovation in this industry would be extremely beneficial to both the nation’s economy and to households in general. Innovation also seems to be the key to bring about solutions to the challenges being faced by the sector.

While it is not possible to measure the impact of every innovation, it is possible to evaluate the innovation activity among firms in the industry. Figure 19 shows the share of innovation-active firms in each industry in Australia. The bars show the percentage of innovation-active firms in each specific sector and the diamond points, referring to the right hand side axis, show the percentage point change from 2012-13.

In Figure 19, the Australian utility sector is highlighted among other industries. Wholesale trade has the highest share of innovation-active firms (57.6%) and Transport, postal and warehousing services has the least (23.3%). The national average sits around 45 per cent, increasing slightly from 2012-13. The Australian utility sector is fairly average (47.3%), with a slightly higher share of innovation-active firms compared to national levels. The increase in innovation-active firms in this sector is significant, at around 10 percentage points from 2012-13.

Figure 19 Share of innovation-active businesses by sector: 2014-15 and change from 2012-13

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

-10

-20

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

-5

-10

Who

lesa

le T

rade

Hea

lth C

are

and

Soci

al A

ssis

tanc

e

Man

ufac

turin

g

Arts

and

Rec

reat

ion

Serv

ices

Acco

mm

odat

ion

and

Food

Ser

vice

s

Prof

essi

onal

, Sci

enti

fic a

nd T

echn

ical

Ser

vice

s

Fina

ncia

l and

Insu

ranc

e Se

rvic

es

Info

rmat

ion

Med

ia a

nd T

elec

omm

unic

atio

ns

Oth

er S

ervi

ces

Elec

tric

ity,

Gas

, Wat

er a

nd W

aste

Ser

vice

s

Adm

inis

trat

ive

and

Supp

ort

Serv

ices

Reta

il Tr

ade

Rent

al, H

iring

and

Rea

l Est

ate

Serv

ices

Min

ing

Cons

truc

tion

Agric

ultu

re, F

ores

try

and

Fish

ing

Tran

spor

t, P

osta

l and

War

ehou

sing

Tota

l

Perc

enta

ge o

f Inn

ovat

ion

Acti

ve B

usin

esse

s

Chan

ge: 2

012-

13 t

o 20

14-1

5 (p

pt)

2014-15 Change from 2012-13

Notes: Figures denote the proportion of businesses in each industry sector that report any innovative activity. Changes are expressed as percentage point differences between 2012-13 and 2014-15.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors' calculations from ABS Cat No 8158D001.

26

Innovation can come in several forms - it could be the introduction of a new product or service, or a new or modified process.

Figure 20 looks at industry sectors according to the incidence and extent of product innovations, while Figure 21 concentrates on process innovations.

Figure 20 shows the instance of innovation in products and its novelty across different industries. Wholesale trade has the highest proportion of product related innovation with almost 32 per cent innovation-active firms. A large proportion of product innovations among Australian industries are new to the business only, rather than being new to the industry. The rental industry for example does not have any new product innovation activity that contributes to the industry or Australian market. In contrast, some industries such as mining are innovating with products that are unique to the world.

Hovering close to national figures, the utility sector has about 19 per cent of innovation-active firms working on product innovation. These innovations contribute to world and national product innovations at almost the same rate, 1.9 per cent and 2.3 per cent respectively.

Wholesale Trade

Manufacturing

Accommodation and Food Services

Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Information Media and Telecommunications

Arts and Recreation Services

Other Services

Health Care and Social Assistance

Retail Trade

Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste Services

Administrative and Support Services

Financial and Insurance Services

Rental, Hiring and Real Estate Services

Mining

Construction

Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing

Transport, Postal and Warehousing

Total

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

New to the world New to Australia New to the industry New to the business only

Figure 20 Incidence and novelty of product innovation by industry sector: 2014-15

Notes: The overall length of each bar represent the shares of businesses in each industry sector that introduced a new or significant product innovation. Separate shades within each bar represent the degree of novelty of innovation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors' calculations from ABS Cat No 8158D002.

31.7

28.5

28.1

25.3

25.1

24.2

24.0

20.5

19.4

18.7

16.9

16.8

15.1

12.6

9.7

8.6

8.3

19.3

27

27

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 21 shows the incidence of novelty in operational process innovations. The pattern of innovation in operational processes in the utility sector is quite interesting and is among top innovative industries in operational process. In terms of innovation in operational processes, the utility sector does not contribute to world innovations and is a follower of world scale operational in process innovations. The utility sector contributes to national innovations at 1.7 per cent.

Manufacturing

Wholesale Trade

Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste Services

Health Care and Social Assistance

Professional, Scientific and Technical Services

Mining

Financial and Insurance Services

Information Media and Telecommunications

Rental, Hiring and Real Estate Services

Other Services

Transport, Postal and Warehousing

Retail Trade

Arts and Recreation Services

Accommodation and Food Services

Administrative and Support Services

Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing

Construction

Total

0 5 10 15 20 25 30

New to the world New to Australia New to the industry New to the business only

Figure 21 Incidence and novelty of operational process innovation by industry sector: 2014-15

Notes: The overall width of each bar represent the shares of businesses in each industry sector that introduced a new or significant innovation in operational processes. Separate shades within each bar represent the degree of novelty of innovation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors' calculations from ABS Cat No

27.6

21.1

19.4

19.2

19.2

18.1

17.5

16.0

15.7

15.5

14.6

13.9

13.8

13.8

12.9

11.1

9.6

15.6

To complement the overview of innovation in the utility sector, Figure 22 shows the drivers of innovation and compares the utility sector with all other Australian businesses. Competition, demand or market drivers play an important role in motivating innovation both in the utility sector and all other businesses. This same rule applies for the Production or delivery of services, with around 50 per cent of all Australian businesses (including utilities) considering production and delivery as one of the drivers of innovation.

The pattern between the utility sector and all other businesses diverges when we consider the reduction of environmental impacts and improving safety as the main drivers of innovation. Around 20 per cent of utility businesses reported the reduction of environmental impacts as one of the drivers of innovation, in comparison to less than 5 per cent or all other businesses. Responses to government regulation also motivates companies in the utility sector to innovate more than it does for all other business.

28

Figure 22 Drivers of innovation in utilities sector: 2014-15

Competition,demand or market

related drivers

Adherence to standards

Response to government regulations

Improve safety or working conditions

Production or delivery

Reduce environmental

impacts

All Businesses

Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste Services

100

80

60

40

20

0

Notes: Estimates have relative standard errors of 10% to 25% and the upper and lower band were not shown to improve visibility. Values for “Adherence to Standard” are missing for 2006-07.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat No. 81580.

Historical trends in the drivers of innovation for the utility sector and all other businesses are also interesting. As shown in Figure 23 (b), the patterns of innovation drivers for all other businesses has been almost constant, with small changes in the areas of production and service delivery and market drivers. But the drivers of innovation for utilities have changed significantly. Recent figures, 2014-15 and 2012-13, show less firms reporting the reduction of environmental impacts as one of the drivers, whereas competition and market related drivers of innovation have been constant throughout the years.

(a) Utilities sector businesses (b) All businesses

Figure 23 Drivers of innovation in utilities sector compared with all businesses: 2008-09 to 2014-15

Competition,demand or market

related drivers

Competition,demand or market

related drivers

Adherence to standards

Adherence to standards

Response to government regulations

Response to government regulations

Improve safety or working conditions

Improve safety or working conditions

Production or delivery

Production or delivery

Reduce environmental

impacts

Reduce environmental

impacts

2014-15 2012-13 2010-11 2008-09

100

80

60

40

20

0

100

80

60

40

20

0

Notes: Estimates have relative standard errors of 10% to 25% and the upper and lower band were not shown to improve visibility. Values for “Adherence to Standard” are missing for 2006-07.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat No. 81580.

29

29

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 24 shows the barriers to innovation for the utility sector, and shows a lack of access to funds as the highest barrier to innovation in the utility sector. Access to funds and skilled workers are also barriers to innovation for all other business, but less so for the utility sector.

Figure 24 Self-reported barriers to innovation, utilities sector and all businesses: 2014-15

Lack of access to additional funds

Cost of development

Other barriers to innovation

Lack of skilled persons: within the...

Uncertain demand for new goods or...

Lack of skilled persons: within the...

Government regulations or...

All Businesses

Electricity, Gas, Water and Waste Services

353025201510

50

Notes: Estimates have relative standard errors of 10% to 25% and the upper and lower band were not shown to improve visibility. Values for “Adherence to Standard” are missing for 2006-07.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat No. 81580.

Lack of skilled persons

Lack of access to knowledge or...

(a) Utilities sector businesses (b) All businesses

Figure 25 Self-reported barriers to innovation, utilities sector and all businesses: 2008-09 to 2014-15

2008-09 2010-11 2012-13 2014-15

Notes: Estimates have relative standard errors of 10% to 25% and the upper and lower band were not shown to improve visibility. Values for “Adherence to Standard” are missing for 2006-07.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | ABS Cat No. 81580.

Lack of access to additional funds

Lack of access to additional funds

Cost of development

Cost of development

Other barriers to innovation

Other barriers to innovation

Lack of skilled persons:

within the...

Lack of skilled persons:

within the...

Uncertain demand for new goods

or...

Uncertain demand for new goods

or...

Lack of skilled persons:

within the...

Lack of skilled persons:

within the...

Government regulations

or...

Government regulations

or...

353025201510

50

353025201510

50

Lack of skilled persons

Lack of skilled persons

Lack of access to knowledge or...

Lack of access to knowledge or...

Figure 25 compares the historical trend of innovation barriers for companies in the utility sector and all other businesses. For all industries, a lack of access to additional funds is most commonly cited as the largest barrier to innovation. However, utilities more commonly cite government regulation or compliance and the cost of development as barriers to innovations than other industries do.

Since 2008-09, the significance of all barriers has increased except for uncertainty about demand. Nonetheless, the reduction in utility businesses citing uncertain demand, government regulations or compliance and a lack of access to knowledge or technology that appeared in the 2012-13 survey all returned to previous levels in the 2014-15 survey.

30

Utilities cite government regulations as a major barrier to innovation.

Future sources100% renewables?

Future sources: 100% renewables?

In the year to March 2017, Australia will produce around 550 tonnes of greenhouse gases, 34 per cent of which will stem from electricity and 17 per cent from transport (Department of Environment, 2017). As the world moves towards a greener future, and with Australia renewing its commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, energy providers and policy makers are expected to take action.

Australian governments, have in general not actively (or indeed collectively) set a clear policy direction when it comes to renewable energy, and changes in consumer choice and behaviour have largely been driving the changes to our energy mix - especially in WA.

Middle income households especially are voting with their feet (or wallets) and adopting roof-top Solar PV at a dramatic rate in response to rising energy costs and personal commitment to reducing greenhouse gases.

Governments are now at the cross-roads in deciding the direction of future energy sources for their constituents. Decisions and planning need to occur now so that energy security, efficiency, low-no carbon and cost effective energy sources are established to replace ageing coal and gas plants.

In this section, we examine the level of energy consumption and electricity generation sourced from renewable sources in WA and how this compares with other states and territories over time. We also assess the current level of investment in the renewable sector in WA and take stock of the question of a 100 per cent renewable energy future for the State.

32

33

33

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Renewables as an energy source

The world is moving towards renewables in preference of high carbon-emission fuels such as coal and gas, with continued price reductions in renewable sources, technological advancement and renewable energy policies driving these patterns (REN21 2017). Between 2015 and 2016, total electricity provided by renewable sources grew by nearly 9 per cent globally, representing 24.5 per cent of the worlds' electricity production (REN21 2017a).

For Australia, the proportion of total energy consumption sourced from renewables has increased marginally over the last decade, currently providing 5.8 per cent of all energy needs nationally – although this is a deterioration from the 1960s levels of around 13 per cent (Table 3).

In recent years, all states and territories have typically seen an increasing share of energy consumption sourced from renewables. Tasmania and South Australia are leading the group, with the weight of electricity generation source from renewables influencing these outcomes. Western Australia has seen a modest rise in recent times, from 1.7 to 2.1 per cent of total energy consumption sourced from renewables between 2008-09 and 2014-15, but the State remains in second last place among all states and territories.

Table 3 Proportion of total net energy consumption sourced from renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

Year New South Wales Victoria Queensland Western

AustraliaSouth

Australia Tasmania Northern Territory Australia

2008-09 3.8% 1.9% 5.7% 1.7% 32.1% 32.1% 0.4% 4.1%2009-10 4.2% 2.2% 8.3% 1.6% 34.7% 34.7% 0.5% 4.8%2010-11 4.7% 2.4% 7.7% 1.5% 37.4% 37.4% 0.5% 5.0%2011-12 4.7% 2.5% 7.5% 1.7% 36.8% 36.8% 0.5% 4.9%2012-13 5.0% 2.8% 8.5% 1.8% 42.7% 42.7% 0.5% 5.5%2013-14 5.1% 3.1% 8.3% 2.0% 49.6% 49.6% 0.6% 5.8%2014-15 5.2% 3.4% 8.5% 2.1% 38.6% 38.6% 0.7% 5.8%

Note: Total net energy consumption is the total quantity (in energy units) of primary and derived fuels consumed less the quantity of derived fuels produced. cccccccccComprehensive data comparing all states and territories is sourced from DIIS. More recent data for the NEM states is available from AEMO and AER. Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table C.

Globally, the world is moving towards renewables in preference of high carbon-emission fuels.

2.1 per cent of WA’s total energy consumption is sourced from renewables.

Turning to electricity generation, Tasmania sits at close to 100 per cent of all power generated sourced from renewables, a legacy of the State’s isolation and natural endowment with the first hydro-electric station built in the early 1900s (Figure 26). Hydro remains the primary renewable energy source for electricity generation, although wind has been playing a greater role in the State with the construction of the Musselroe Wind Farm in 2013 and the expansion of the Woolnorth Wind Farm in 2007. Energy security has been problematic for the State, with heavy reliance on water coupled with depleting storage levels and the 2015 Basslink outage leading to a Senate Inquiry and Tasmania Energy Security Taskforce being established.

South Australia has seen a sharp increase in electricity generated from renewable sources in a relatively short period, rising from 14.4 to 40.4 per cent in the space of six years, and recent data from the Australian Energy Regulator has placed South Australia’s energy derived from renewables at 57 per cent. But this rapid transition has not been without controversy or difficulties. In particular, intermittency has been problematic for the State, where morning and evening peaks are such that renewables cannot always be relied up on for adequate power supply. The Finkel Review has sought to deal with this by recommending that all renewable projects going forward be required to produce dispatchable power (Finkel 2017). South Australia’s recent announcements for two large-scale storage projects will likely resolve some of the intermittency issues the State has experienced, but may not be a complete solution.

Figure 26 Proportion of electricity generation sourced by renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Pro

port

ion

of e

lect

ricit

y ge

nera

tion

sou

rced

from

re

new

able

s (%

)

Notes: Comprehensive data comparing all states and territories is sourced from DIIS. More recent data for the NEM states is available from AEMO and AER. This figure captures all electricity generation and in addition to power plants, includes rooftop solar PV generation, generation by industrial facilities such as in mining and manufacturing, and off-grid generation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O5.

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

WA Australia NSW Vic QLD SA Tas NT

34

Among the remainder of the states and territories, NSW and Victoria are almost equal third-placed in electricity generation sourced from renewables – 10.8 and 10.4 per cent respectively (Figure 27). Victoria has moved the farthest in the period between 2008-09 and 2014-15 from around 2 to 10 per cent. Western Australia has seen electricity generation sourced from renewables increase from 2.9 to 7.1 per cent in the six years to 2014-15. This represents 2,659 of the total 37,552 GWh generated in 2014-15. Queensland has also seen a rise in electricity generated from renewable sources, from 3.5 to 6.2 per cent. The NT has the lowest electricity generation sourced from renewables, with a rising trajectory in recent periods.

The flattening or decrease in renewable electricity generation between 2013-14 and 2014-15 across most states and territories is likely to stem from the repeal of the carbon pricing scheme on 1 July 2014. When in operation, the carbon pricing scheme saw a decline in output from brown coal generators of 16 per cent, and black coal generators, 9 per cent (AER 2017). This represented a fall in total emissions from electricity generation of 10.3 per cent in the two years the carbon price was in operation (AER 2017).

Figure 27 Proportion of electricity generation sourced by renewables, states and territories (excluding SA and Tas): 2008-09 to 2014-15

20

18

16

14

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Pro

port

ion

of e

lect

ricit

y ge

nera

tion

sou

rced

from

re

new

able

s (%

)

Notes: Comprehensive data comparing all states and territories is sourced from DIIS. More recent data for the NEM states is available from AEMO and AER. This figure captures all electricity generation and in addition to power plants, includes rooftop solar PV generation, generation by industrial facilities such as in mining and manufacturing, and off-grid generation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O5.

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

WA Australia NSW Vic QLD NT

The composition of renewable energy fuels for electricity generation in Western Australia varies considerably compared to national trends (Figure 28). The weight of Tasmania’s hydro-electric generation drives the composition that we see nationally, constituting 39 per cent of all renewable energy fuels. This compares with only 8 per cent of renewable electricity generation sourced from hydro for Western Australia.

35

35

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

A has seen electricity generation sourced from renewables increase from 2.9 to 7.1 per cent in the six years to 2014-15.

For WA, Wind is the most common source of renewable electricity generation, constituting two-thirds of WA’s renewable electricity. Nationally, Wind is responsible for one-third of electricity generation sourced from renewables. Solar photovoltaic (PV) is the second largest source of renewable energy in WA (26%), followed by Hydro (8%) and Biogas (5%).

Australia

Bagasse, wood

Biogas

Wind

Hydro

Solar PV

4%

39%

17%

Figure 28 Composition of renewable energy fuels used for electricity generation: WA and Australia, 2014-15

Notes: Comprehensive data comparing all states and territories is sourced from DIIS. More recent data for the NEM states is available from AEMO and AER. This figure captures all electricity generation and in addition to power plants, includes rooftop solar PV generation, generation by industrial facilities such as in mining and manufacturing, and off-grid generation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O5.

33%

Western Australia

8%

5%

26%

62%

6%

Recently, the composition of renewable energy fuels used for electricity generation in Western Australia has been changing, with Solar PV and Hydro playing a greater role than in previous years (Figure 29). The increase in solar is largely driven by increased installations of small-scale Solar PV units, triggered by the West Australian goverments, Feed-in-Tariff (FiT) scheme which began on 1 July 2010 under the renewable energy buy-back scheme. The scheme included a state government contribution of 40 cents per kWh and an additional 7 cents per kWh paid by the customer’s retailer.

Currently, around 1 in 4 West Australian dwellings that are deemed suitable for roof-top solar have units installed, taking it to third place among the states and territories behind Queensland (32%), and South Australia (31%) (ABS 2017a). As of 2016, Mandurah recorded just over 10,000 small-scale Solar PV installations, making it the top postcode in WA for Solar PV. The opening of the 10MW Greenough River solar farm in Walkaway near Geraldton in 2012 is also likely to be playing a smaller role in increased renewable electricity sourced from solar. And while Wind remains the primary renewable source of electricity, its domination has reduced from 83 to 62 per cent in a relatively short timeframe.

36

Two-thirds of WA’s renewable electricity generation is sourced from Wind compared with one-third nationally.

1 in 4 suitable WA dwellings have roof-top solar.

Mandurah is the top solar postcode in WA with over 10,000 installations.

Figure 29 Composition of renewable energy fuels used for electricity generation - WA, 2008-09 to 2014-15

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

Com

posi

tion

of r

enew

able

fuel

s us

ed fo

rel

ectr

icit

y ge

nera

tion

(%)

Solar PV Hydro Wind Biogas

Notes: Comprehensive data comparing all states and territories is sourced from DIIS. More recent data for the NEM states is available from AEMO and AER. This figure captures all electricity generation and in addition to power plants, includes rooftop solar PV generation, generation by industrial facilities such as in mining and manufacturing, and off-grid generation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O5.

2 719 19

22

11

23

8

26

8

8379

7074

63 6462

15 14 11 7 5 5 5

Employment in renewable energy in Western Australia currently stands at around 1,060 full-time equivalent (FTE) employees (Table 4). This represents a decline in annual direct FTE employment of 1,170 from its peak of 2,230 in 2011-12. Employment in Solar PV has remained the dominant employment type in the renewable energy sector. This is largely driven by roof-top solar PV installations, which in 2011-12 employed almost 2,000 FTEs as a result of government incentives through the FiT scheme.

Employment in the renewable Wind sub-sector in WA peaked in 2010-11 at 360 FTE employees, coinciding with the construction of the Collgar Wind Farm located 25 kilometres south east of Merredin; but has since wound down to only 40 FTEs in the 2015-16 financial year.

Other states and territories have experienced similar declines in employment since peaking between 2010 and 2012. However, employment is expected to increase over the coming years as large-scale renewable projects get underway and demand for Solar PV continues to rise.

Table 4 Direct FTE Employment in Renewable Energy - Western Australia, 2009-10 to 2015-16

Renewable Engery 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16no. no. no. no. no. no. no.

Solar 960 1,660 1,980 1,450 1,010 980 990 Wind 70 360 200 100 50 40 40 Biomass 20 20 20 20 20 10 10 Other* - 10 - 10 - - - Govt / NPI 20 30 30 20 20 20 20 Total 1,070 2,080 2,230 1,600 1,100 1,050 1,060

Note: *Hydro and geothermal. FTE = full-time equivalent.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table O5.

37

37

Employment in renewable energy in Western Australia currently stands at around 1,060 FTE employees.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Investment in renewables

38

Investment in solar and wind will constitute three-quarters of the $10.2 trillion of expected global investment in new power generation technology out to 2040.

2 This represents a reduction from the previous 41,000 GWh, which was changed in June 2015 through the Renewable Energy (Electricity) Amendment Bill 2015.

Globally, the renewable resource sector is thriving. On latest figures to come out of the 2017 Bloomberg New Energy Finance report, investment in solar and wind is expected to constitute three-quarters of the $10.2 trillion of future global investment in new power generation technology out to 2040 (BNEF 2017).

For Australia, the repeal of the carbon price in 2014, followed by a two-year review of the Renewable Energy Target initiated by the Abbott government has brought uncertainty to the renewable energy market with little investment activity in large-scale renewable projects in recent times (CEC 2016). This uncertainty was lessened towards the end of 2016, when the Turnbull government renewed Australia’s commitment to the 2015 Paris agreement, binding Australia to emissions reductions of 2 to 28 per cent on 2005 levels by 2030.

To achieve these reductions, the Australian government has set a Renewable Energy Target (RET) to reduce greenhouse emissions stemming from the electricity sector through encouraging and supporting generation from sustainable and renewable sources. A large-scale renewable energy target and small-scale renewable energy scheme have been operationalised, both of which are administered by the Clean Energy Regulator. The large-scale renewable energy target is seeking to achieve 33,000 GWh2 of renewable electricity generation by 2020.

39

39

$7.3 billion in renewable projects are set to go to construction in 2017.

Queensland will add an extra 784MW of renewable capacity, with forward project investment valued at $1.76 billion.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The sector is now moving full-speed ahead, with 2017 expected to be one of the biggest years for large-scale renewable infrastructure build (CEC 2016). The Clean Energy Council has valued the 30 projects set to commence construction in 2017 at $7.3 billion (Figure 30). These projects are expected to add around 3,150MW of new generation capacity and provide an additional 3,725 jobs.

NSW is set to lead the states and territories when it comes to investment and jobs in the renewable sector over the coming 12 months, with over $2 billion and 1,170 direct jobs created and an additional 1,018MW of capacity (Figure 30). Among these projects is the 270MW Sapphire Wind Farm located between Glen Innes and Inverell, which began construction in January 2017. The project is valued at $588 million and will generate enough clean energy to power 115,000 homes and offset over 700,000 tonnes of carbon emissions each year (Sapphire 2017).

Queensland will add an extra 784MW of renewable capacity, with forward project investment valued at $1.76 billion. Major projects include the $400 million Lilyvale Solar Farm 50 kilometres south-west of Emerald, which will add 100MW of capacity to the State, and the $380 million Mt Emerald Wind Farm, which will see 53 wind turbines with the capacity to generate up to 180MW. The Mt Emerald Wind Farm will supply around one-third of the power needs of Far North Queensland.

South Australia is continuing its strong investment trajectory in large-scale renewable energy projects. The State currently has projects valued at $1.74 billion either under construction or to start construction in 2017, adding 644MW of capacity. These figures exclude recent announcements by the South Australian government, which includes the $50 million investment in the world’s largest (100MW) lithium-ion battery and $650 million 150MW solar thermal plant. Both projects are set to commence work within the next 12 months.

The Riverland Solar Farm to be built at Morgan in South Australia’s Riverland is one of the largest projects to start construction, valued at $1 billion. The project will add 330MW of capacity and include 100MW in battery storage. Stages 2 and 3 of the Hornsdale Wind Farm are also underway, with the overall project valued at $800 million, and capacity of 209MW.

Figure 30 Renewable Projects under construction end of 2016 and to start construction in 2017

Notes: *Projects at the commissioning phase at the end of 2016 are not included in the total new capacity figure. Investment in the South Australia Hornsdale Wind Farm includes stages 1, 2, & 3. Data for ACT and NT not available. ACT is expected to draw most of their renewable energy from other states and territories.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Clean Energy Council Australia, Various other sources.

Victoria will add 687MW of renewable capacity with investment valued at $1.3 billion underway or set to commence this year. The biggest of these projects is the first large-scale solar project for the State led by Overland Sun Farming and comprising three sites at Yatpool, Iraak and Wemen in the state’s North. The combined projects are valued at $500 million and will add 320MW of renewable energy capacity. The second largest project underway is the Ararat Wind Farm, adding 75 new turbines and 240MW of renewable capacity to the grid. The total value of the project is $450 million and it will generate enough electricity to power around 120,000 Victorian homes.

Western Australia lags behind other states and territories when it comes to investment in the renewable sector. The State currently has only one large-scale project in play – a 20MW solar farm at Emu Downs, that will share the transmission connection and facilities with APA’s existing 80MW Emu Downs Wind Farm. The total value of the project is $50 million and primarily provides energy for Kwinana’s desalination plant.

40

Western Australia lags behind other states and territories when it comes to investment in large-scale renewable projects.

Investment: $50M

Jobs: 100

Megawa�s:20

Investment: $1,295M

Jobs: 535

Megawa�s:687

Investment: $2,037M

Jobs: 620

Megawa�s:644

Investment: $2,140M

Jobs: 1,170

Megawa�s:1,018

Investment: $1,764M

Jobs: 1,300

Megawa�s:784

0 269Turbines

20 1,018MW

Investment Jobs MW Turbines5233,1533,725$7,286M

Australia

Household investmentWhile large-scale renewable projects are flagging in WA relative to other states and territories, household investment in Solar PV is flourishing and is set to become the State’s largest growth area for renewable power. Currently, total capacity from roof-top Solar PV in WA is around 730MW, the second largest combined power source in the State, second only to the Muja Power Station.

The capacity of roof-top Solar PV in Western Australia has grown by 37 per cent in the last 18 months alone, due to 19 per cent growth in the number of installations over the period, and an increase in the average MW capacity per installation – rising from 4.8MW to 5.6MW. If this trend continues, Solar PV capacity is predicted to reach more than 2,000MW by 2022, making it the largest quasi-power plant in WA (Figure 31).

Figure 31 Generating capacity from WA rooftop solar, 2016 to 2022

2,500

2,000

1,500

1,000

500

0

Gen

erat

ing

capa

city

from

WA

rooft

op s

olar

(MW

)

Notes: Projections are based on predictions from a log linear regression of total MW of rooftop solar PV capacity, and reflect the growth both in the number of installations and the average MW output per solar PV installation.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from Clean Energy Regulator data on solar PV by postcode.

Jan

2016

Jul 2

016

Jan

2017

Jul 2

017

Jan

2018

Jul 2

018

Jan

2019

Jul 2

019

Jan

2020

Jul 2

020

Jan

2021

Jul 2

021

Jan

2022

MW from rooftop solar projected MW from rooftop solar ci (lower) ci (upper)

Similar trends are predicted on a national level, with consumer-driven roof-top solar PV expected to account for around 24 per cent of electricity generation by 2040, and Australia forecast to become one of the most decentralised electric systems in the world, housing 45 per cent of total power generating capacity behind-the-metre (BNEF 2017).

41

41

Capacity from roof-top Solar PV is predicted to reach 2,000MW by 2022.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Is 100% renewables realistic?

The world is moving full steam ahead towards a renewable future with policy, people and the market driving change. As of the end of 2016, 48 developing countries, 34 businesses and several cities and smaller jurisdictions had committed to targets of 100 per cent renewable energy, with this number growing each year (REN21 2017a). The ACT added itself to this list in 2016, committing to a target of 100 per cent renewable energy by 2020. Byron Bay Shire Council has also set a 100 per cent renewable energy target by 2025, and Coffs Harbour 100 per cent renewable electricity by 2030.

A number of countries, cities and communities have already achieved a status of 100 per cent renewable energy or electricity across the globe. These include Albania, Iceland, Paraguay, Costa Rica and smaller areas such as Greensburg, Kansas and Burlington, Vermont (REN21 2017a). For many jurisdictions, renewable targets continue to be revised up rather than down, as they are quickly met or exceeded. South Australia is one such example, when in 2009 they set a renewable energy target of 33 per cent by 2020, yet achieved this by 2014 and have now set for themselves a target of 50 per cent by 2025, with recent reports suggesting that they have now exceeded this second target (AER 2017).

While the ACT has set a target of 100 per cent renewable electricity by 2020, whereas Queensland has opted for 50 per cent by 2030 and Victoria 40 per cent by 2025. Western Australia and New South Wales are yet to follow.

For Australia, a number of studies have been conducted that test the hypothesis of a 100 per cent or thereabouts renewable scenario, typically in relation to our National Electricity Market (see for example AEMO 2013; Elliston et al. 2013 & 2016, Blakers 2017) and recently for the South West Interconnect System (Lu et al. 2017). The studies seek to optimise the mix of renewable energy sources at the lowest cost option relative to the grid coverage and climate and show that 100 per cent renewables is more than possible, and typically at a competitive and often at lower cost than conventional sources.

The CSIRO, along with a number of other experts, also concur that there is no technical obstruction to reaching 100 per cent renewables (CSIRO 2017; REN21 2017b). A recent global study by REN21 collected global views about the feasibility of achieving a state of 100 per cent renewables, interviewing over 110 energy experts from around the world including Australia. The study found that there was universal agreement among Australian experts that globally we can achieve a 100 per cent renewable energy supply (REN21 2017b).

Arguably, it is no longer a question of whether reaching close to 100 per cent renewables is a possibility, but more a question of how and when we get there.

42

For many jurisdictions renewable targets continue to be revised up rather than down as they are quickly met or exceeded.

Close to 100 per cent renewables is no longer a question of if...but how and when.

Cost of renewables The cost of renewable technology is falling at a rapid pace, making renewables not only a sensible choice for the environment, but also a rational economic choice when it comes to replacing or decommissioning ageing fossil fuel powered plants.

According to the latest Bloomberg New Energy Finance report, globally, the levelised cost of electricity (LCOE) from Solar PV is now a quarter of its 2009 value and is predicted to decrease by another 66 per cent by 2040 (BNEF 2017). The same report also predicts the cost of on and offshore wind to continue to fall, by 47 and 71 per cent respectively as competition increases and turbines become more efficient.

LCOE allows for a comparison of the cost of new-build technology incorporating differences in cost profiles and other parameters. The metric typically includes a number of key pieces of information such as the life of the asset, cost of capital, ongoing operating and maintenance costs, fuel costs, discount rate, and specific technology related costs such as CO2 storage.

The latest BNEF report estimates the LCOE of new-build Solar PV and Wind in Australia is now cheaper than new-build Coal and on-par, or in some instances cheaper than new-build combined-cycle Gas (Figure 32). New-build Wind is estimated to cost between $61-$118/MWh and Solar PV between $78-$140/MWh. On the other hand, new-build supercritical Coal is estimated to cost between $134-$203/MWh, and adding carbon capture and storage (effectively a carbon price) would see this increase to around $352/MWh. Combined-cycle Gas generation remains relatively cheap in Australia, with new builds costing between $74-$90/MWh on average over their lifetime.

Figure 32 Levelised cost of electricity, new builds, Australia, 2017

250

200

150

100

50

0

Leve

lised

Cos

t of

Ele

ctric

ity

($/M

wh)

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Wind Solar PV Gas Coal

For Western Australia, the cost of moving to a renewable future for the South West Interconnected System (SWIS) has recently been estimated using a scenario that compares like-for-like fossil-fuel replacement with 90-100 per cent renewables sourced from Solar PV, Wind and pumped-Hydro storage (Lu et al. 2017). The study finds that Wind and Solar PV are a competitive alternative to fossil fuels for the SWIS, with the difference between the two scenarios narrowing over time as the price of renewable technology continues to fall and when factoring in the previous 2014 carbon price.

43

43

The levelised cost of new-build Solar PV is now a quarter of its.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Reliability of renewablesRapid transition to renewables without careful planning can accentuate intermittency problems that exist with renewable technology, which are often limited to generating power when the sun is shining and the wind blowing. The consequences of high dependence on renewable sources are such that morning and evening peak demand cannot always be met.

Over and above this are issues about general network stability, specifically in relation to frequency, voltage and system inertia, where fluctuations occur in supply as weather patterns vary throughout the day. This emphasises the need for cost-effective storage options for current and new renewable energy technologies to ensure adequate power supply. The Finkel review’s recommendation to require all renewable projects going forward to have the capacity to produce dispatchable power will increase the future reliability of renewable energy if mandated. Greater efficiency balancing energy demand over the course of the day and across large-scale grid systems that can draw from alternate weather systems is also likely to help overcome the intermittency problems associated with renewable sources.

Summary In 2015, Western Australia’s greenhouse gas emissions totalled 86.5 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent – fourth ranked behind Qld, NSW and Vic. WA – contributed 16.1 per cent to Australia’s national emissions in 2015, which were 537.8 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent. While other states and territories have set themselves proactive policies including renewable energy targets to reduce their carbon footprint and contribute to Australia’s emissions reduction target, Western Australia is still to take substantial action on this front.

Investment in large-scale renewable energy in WA is lagging when compared to other states and territories and overall energy and electricity generated from renewable sources is relatively low compared to other jurisdictions. Most of the direct action is coming from the household sector as they take their energy needs and energy affordability into their own hands, moving to behind the meter roof-top Solar PV. Collectively, households (and businesses) are soon to become the biggest electricity provider in the State, holding more than 2,000MW of combined capacity. However, this capacity is still limited by the intermittent nature of Solar PV.

The State is slowly moving towards a renewable energy future, but mainly through household driven demand rather than direct policy action and planning led by the state government. This has a number of negative implications for those households and businesses that are unable to take advantage of Solar PV, especially those that are renting. This is discussed further in the Power to all People section later in this report. Further, household Solar PV penetration cannot solely be relied upon to move WA towards a renewable, clean energy future alone. Large-scale renewable technology together with adequate storage options and balancing efficiencies must be included in any future renewable energy plan for the State.

44

Consumptionand costs

Consumption and costs

As energy becomes more integrated into our daily lives, it is more or less a common “commodity” for every household and individual. The increasing role of energy in daily tasks means cost increases are felt more acutely, and linked to this is a change in household energy consumption patterns. The interdependency of energy cost and consumption implies they should be looked at simultaneously. In this section we look at the consumption patterns of energy among states and territories.

46

Consumption of energy

47

47

On a per captia basis, WA's energy consumption is 1.8 times the national average.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

There are two main channels of energy consumption; households and industry. Energy is an important intermediary input for many industries and often its consumption is used as an indication of economic activity. However, the decomposition of industries and production processes can alter consumption trends and patterns.

Figure 33 shows the yearly consumption of energy adjusted for population across different states and territories. According to latest figures, Australian energy consumption per capita sits around 250 gigajoules, showing a moderate downward trend since 2008-09. Victoria's consumption sits very close to national figures. Energy consumption in NSW, Tasmania and South Australia have remained the lowest in the country since 1990-91, around 200 gigajoules per capita, per annum. Their consumption increased in the period of 2003-04 to 2008-09 to around 240 gigajoules, before leveling off again. Since the early 2000s, energy consumption trends in Queensland have diverged from Victoria and the national average, increasing to around 300 gigajoules per captia, per year.

Figure 33 Annual energy consumption per capita, states and territories: 1990-01 to 2014-15

500

450

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Annu

al e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n pe

r cap

ita

(gig

ajou

lles

per p

erso

n)

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table B1.

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT AUS

On a per captia basis, WA's energy consumption is 1.8 times the national average, with the state typically the number one or second heaviest consumer in the nation. In the early 2000s WA was energy consumption was the highest in Australia on a per capita basis, with increased economic activity and the mining boom driving these patterns. The state has continued to remain the top energy consumer, with the NT energy consumption falling dramatically in recent times.

While most states and territories per capita energy consumption has been declining since the mid-2000s, WA's has continued to rise, although recently plateauing.

Over the 25 years shown, WA's energy consumption per capita has increased slightly from just below 350 to 400 gigajoules per year. The moderate increase in energy consumption in WA is quite interesting when compared to other states'. While energy consumption across the rest of the country recorded a modest decrease, energy consumption in WA has consistency grown at a moderate rate.

Figure 34 Annual energy ‘productivity’ by states and territories: 1990-01 to 2014-15

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Ener

gy c

onsu

mpt

ion

'pro

duct

ivit

y'

Sm G

SP p

er g

igaj

oulle

s

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table B1.

1990

-91

1991

-92

1992

-93

1993

-94

1994

-95

1995

-96

1996

-97

1997

-98

1998

-99

1999

-00

2000

-01

2001

-02

2002

-03

2003

-04

2004

-05

2005

-06

2006

-07

2007

-08

2008

-09

2009

-10

2010

-11

2011

-12

2012

-13

2013

-14

2014

-15

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT AUS

To analyse the trend of contribution of the energy, Figure 34 displays the value of Gross State Product (GSP) for every Peta joule of energy, known as the `productivity' of energy. Lowest among the states and territories is NT, with NSW consistency reporting the highest productivity. All states and territories have a trended upwards, with some showing more rapid growth than others. Energy productivity in SA has had significant growth from 2009-10, now only behind NSW in energy productivity. With the exception of SA and NSW, all other states and territories are, and have been, below the national figures.

WA's energy productivity has increased from around 180 million per unit of energy (Peta joules) to around 260 million over the last 25 years. In the period between 2003-04 and 2008-09, WA's energy productivity aligns with national figures, however since then its productivity has dropped, keeping in line with Vic.

48

NSW has the highest energy "productivity".

Figure 35 Annual electricity consumption by states and territories: per million population, 1960-61 to 2014-15

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Annu

al e

lect

ricit

y co

nsum

ptio

n pe

r mill

ion

popu

lati

on

(PJ/

mill

ion)

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, Table D1.

1960

-61

1963

-64

1966

-67

1969

-70

1972

-73

1975

-76

1978

-79

1981

-82

1984

-85

1987

-88

1990

-91

1993

-94

1996

-97

1999

-00

2002

-03

2005

-06

2008

-09

2011

-12

2014

-15

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas NT

To clarify the consumption pattern across states and territories, we first look at electricity consumption, Figure 35, followed by energy consumption by fuel type, Figure 36. Figure 35 shows the units (Peta joules) of electricity consumption for every 1 million of population. Tasmania has the highest electricity consumption per capita among all other states and territories and SA has the lowest. Since the 1960s, all states and territories have shown growth in their per capita electricity consumption but the growth has smoothed out in recent years. Since 2008-09, some states have even recorded a reduction. What is clear from Figure 35, is NSW, Vic and Qld have shown a reduction in electricity consumption per capita since 2011-12. WA's electricity consumption per capita has steadily increased since the late 1970s, increasing by 2.5 times in last 40 years. WA consumed just under 20 units (Peta joules) of energy for every 1 million population in 1972-73, but according to 2014-15 figures, the electricity consumption per capita in WA has increased to somewhere around 50 units (Peta joules).

In Figure 36, we look at the consumption trend by fuel type. Except for coal, WA is a top consumer of any fuel type among other states. In coal sourced energy consumption, WA is in the bottom half of the list among states and territories. In solar and gas sourced energy consumption, there is a substantial difference between WA and other states. WA's consumption of solar produced energy was fairly constant in the 25 years following 1978-9, but from 2005-06, consumption spiked and has increased since. A similar pattern is observable for Gas - constant in the period between 1969-70 and 1984-85, before starting an upward trend that carries through to 2014-15. The trend of WA's energy consumption generated by petroleum is interesting too. Petroleum recorded significant growth from 1690-61 to 1978-79, before dropping and staying almost constant until 2011-12, showing signs of an increase in last 5 years.

49

49

Tasmania's electricity consumption per capita is highest across states and territories.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 36 Annual energy consumption per million population, states and territories: by fuel type, 1960-61 to 2014-15

Notes: Energy consumption for each state and territory expressed in Gigajoules (GJ) per million of state population. Population data figures drawn from ABS Cat.No 3101.0.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations using Department of Industry, Innovation and Science Tables D1 to D8 (Australian and state/territory energy consumption).

(a) Solar energy

1.6

1.4

1.2

1.0

0.8

0.6

0.4

0.2

0

Annu

al s

olar

ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion

per

mill

ion

popu

lati

on (P

J/m

illio

n)

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas

1960

-61

1962

-63

1964

-65

1966

-67

1968

-69

1970

-71

1972

-73

1974

-75

1976

-77

1978

-79

1980

-81

1982

-83

1984

-85

1986

-87

1988

-89

1990

-91

1992

-93

1994

-95

1996

-97

1998

-99

2000

-01

2002

-03

2004

-05

2006

-07

2008

-09

2010

-11

2012

-13

2014

-15

(b) Petroleum

200

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Annu

al p

etro

leum

con

sum

ptio

n pe

r m

illio

n po

pula

tion

(PJ/

mill

ion)

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas

1960

-61

1962

-63

1964

-65

1966

-67

1968

-69

1970

-71

1972

-73

1974

-75

1976

-77

1978

-79

1980

-81

1982

-83

1984

-85

1986

-87

1988

-89

1990

-91

1992

-93

1994

-95

1996

-97

1998

-99

2000

-01

2002

-03

2004

-05

2006

-07

2008

-09

2010

-11

2012

-13

2014

-15

(c) Coal

180

160

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

Annu

al c

oal c

onsu

mpt

ion

per m

illio

n po

pula

tion

(PJ/

mill

ion)

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas

1960

-61

1962

-63

1964

-65

1966

-67

1968

-69

1970

-71

1972

-73

1974

-75

1976

-77

1978

-79

1980

-81

1982

-83

1984

-85

1986

-87

1988

-89

1990

-91

1992

-93

1994

-95

1996

-97

1998

-99

2000

-01

2002

-03

2004

-05

2006

-07

2008

-09

2010

-11

2012

-13

2014

-15

(d) Gas

250

200

150

100

50

0

Annu

al g

as c

onsu

mpt

ion

per m

illio

n po

pula

tion

(PJ/

mill

ion)

NSW Vic QLD WA SA Tas

1960

-61

1962

-63

1964

-65

1966

-67

1968

-69

1970

-71

1972

-73

1974

-75

1976

-77

1978

-79

1980

-81

1982

-83

1984

-85

1986

-87

1988

-89

1990

-91

1992

-93

1994

-95

1996

-97

1998

-99

2000

-01

2002

-03

2004

-05

2006

-07

2008

-09

2010

-11

2012

-13

2014

-15

50

WA's consumption of solar and gas produced energy was fairly constant for many years but spiked in recent years.

Energy costs in WA

51

51

Perth utility prices have remained consistently below those in all other states and territories since the start of the millennium.

The utility price gap between Perth and other capital cities has widened since the start of 2017.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The costs of utilities - including electricity, gas and water - can be a significant imposition on households and businesses across the country. Rising energy costs materially affect household financial wellbeing, and present challenges to business sustainability, a fact highlighted in the recent public concern expressed over the issue.

The energy market in Western Australia continues to be highly regulated, a feature that the State shares with other jurisdictions in Australia. However, one point of difference to emerge in WA in the last two years relates to a change in responsibilities for planning and regulation. Although WA sits outside the National Energy Market (NEM), the planning and regulatory functions for the State’s energy market are now carried out by the national Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).

This section provides an overview of Consumer Price Index movements, both for WA utilities prices overall, and separately for electricity and gas prices. The analysis compares headline consumer energy prices in WA with other states and territories in Australia, as well as looking at real average household expenditures on energy and utilities.

Our findings serve to lay down a benchmark against which to judge the future evolution of energy costs in WA, and how affordability compares between households in the West and the rest of Australia. With planning and regulation ultimately impacting on residential and business energy prices, this analysis can also serve, at least, to provide context against which to judge the impact of the new regulatory framework for WA.

UtilitiesOverall, the composite utility price index for Perth has remained consistently below those for other state capital cities in every year since the start of the millennium, as shown in Panel (a) of Figure 37. Brisbane has faced the greatest overall utility price inflation since 2000, particularly in the period from June 2014 to date. Melbourne ranks second in terms of growth in utility prices since 2000, followed by Adelaide and Sydney.

Looking closer at utility price movements over time, Perth prices rose more rapidly in the two years from March 2009 to September 2011, by some 20 per cent annually. There was a short period of relative stability between 2013 and end 2015, but the most recent ABS data for June 2017 shows the price gap between Perth and Australia has again widened. This is due principally to recent sharp increases in utility prices in Adelaide, Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney.

Panel (a) of Figure 37 also compares Perth utility prices to the national eight-capital average, and confirms the existence of a widening utility price gap between Perth and the rest of Australia, particularly between 2012 and mid-2014. After some narrowing in prices, the gap has again widened since the start of 2017.

Figure 37 Annual energy consumption per million population, states and territories: by fuel type, March 2000 to June 2017

Notes: CPI has been adjusted to an index reference period of March quarter 2000 = 100 – All Utilities include Electricity, Water and sewage, Gas and other household fuels.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from ABS Cat No. 6401.0 Consumer Price Index, Table 11.

Mar

200

0D

ec 2

000

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3D

ec 2

003

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6D

ec 2

006

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9D

ec 2

009

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2D

ec 2

012

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5D

ec 2

015

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

Mar

200

0D

ec 2

000

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3D

ec 2

003

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6D

ec 2

006

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9D

ec 2

009

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2D

ec 2

012

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5D

ec 2

015

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

Mar

200

0D

ec 2

000

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3D

ec 2

003

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6D

ec 2

006

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9D

ec 2

009

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2D

ec 2

012

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5D

ec 2

015

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

States and territories

States and territories

States and territories

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

400

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

utili

ty C

PI In

dex,

Mar

ch 2

000=

100

utili

ty C

PI In

dex,

Mar

ch 2

000=

100

utili

ty C

PI In

dex,

Mar

ch 2

000=

100

Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth Canberra

Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth

Sydney Melbourne Brisbane Adelaide Perth

Mar

200

0

Dec

200

0

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3

Dec

200

3

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6

Dec

200

6

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9

Dec

200

9

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2

Dec

201

2

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5

Dec

201

5

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

Mar

200

0

Dec

200

0

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3

Dec

200

3

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6

Dec

200

6

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9

Dec

200

9

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2

Dec

201

2

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5

Dec

201

5

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

Mar

200

0

Dec

200

0

Sep

2001

Jun

2002

Mar

200

3

Dec

200

3

Sep

2004

Jun

2005

Mar

200

6

Dec

200

6

Sep

2007

Jun

2008

Mar

200

9

Dec

200

9

Sep

2010

Jun

2011

Mar

201

2

Dec

201

2

Sep

2013

Jun

2014

Mar

201

5

Dec

201

5

Sep

2016

Jun

2017

Difference – Australia vs WA

Difference – Australia vs WA

Difference – Australia vs WA

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

Uti

lity

CPI I

ndex

, Mar

ch 2

000=

100

Uti

lity

CPI I

ndex

, Mar

ch 2

000=

100

Uti

lity

CPI I

ndex

, Mar

ch 2

000=

100

Gap: AUS-Perth (RHS) Perth Australia

Gap: AUS-Perth (RHS) Perth Australia

Gap: AUS-Perth (RHS) Perth Australia

(a) All utilities

(b) Electricity

(c) Gas

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

350

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

-50

And what has been driving these utility price changes? In particular, how do electricity and gas prices compare between Perth and other state and territory jurisdictions? Panels (b) and (c) of Figure 37 compare electricity and gas prices for Perth and the main state capitals since 2000, and against the national average over the same period.

Interestingly, while electricity prices have remained consistently lower in Perth than elsewhere, gas prices for Perth moved significantly higher compared to Australia, a feature of the relatively high demand for gas in Western Australia and with prices increasing at a faster rate since 2009-10.

52

Electricity WA’s electricity market has remained in the public eye, and high on the WA government’s reform agenda, for a number of years. The state government’s supply company, Western Power, was separated in 2006 into four separate state-owned entities – Verve Energy, Western Power, Synergy and Horizon Power.

In April 2013, the WA Liberal Government announced that Verve and Synergy, respectively the State’s electricity generator and retailer, would be merged into a single entity, also called Synergy, from 1 January 2014. This move, part of a broader review of the WA Wholesale Energy Market (WEM), was prompted by high state subsidies of up to $500 million per year and a near doubling of electricity prices over the period from 2008 to 2014 (Figure 37 Panel b). As noted earlier, the State’s energy sector moved to a new national planning and regulation framework in 2015, overseen by the Australian Energy Market Operator (AEMO).

Electricity prices rose significantly in Western Australia over the period from 2009 to 2012, particularly in the South West of the State, after a period of price stability stretching for almost a decade before (Figure 37 Panel b). Electricity prices also increased in other states from 2009, and for some capital cities – notably Adelaide, Brisbane, Sydney and Melbourne - at a greater and for a longer period rate than Perth. Perth’s electricity prices stabilised from September 2013 to June 2017, with electricity price inflation remaining lower than a number of state capitals.

GasThe story of gas prices in Western Australia is a somewhat different to the electricity price narrative. WA’s gas price index leapt in June 2008, driven by a gas supply crisis precipitated by the Apache Energy plant explosion on 3 June 2008. The resultant loss of a third of the State’s gas supply drove Perth consumer gas prices to increase by 19 per cent between March and September 2008 (Panel c, Figure 37). Prices rose by up to 30 per cent from December 2009 to mid-2010, and sharply again in June 2011 and March 2012, the latter driven by the effects on gas prices of long-term gas contracts locked in by Japan after the Fukushima nuclear disaster. Gas prices stabilised from September 2013, with the gap between WA and national gas prices narrowing over the course of the last four years.

Rising prices place additional pressures on businesses that rely heavily on gas as an input to production. Gas prices and the balance between supply and demand have been a topic of policy attention both in WA and nationally. Indeed, the Economic Regulation Authority’s 2014 Microeconomic Reform inquiry focussed on gas supply as a key policy area for reform (ERA 2014).

In 2006, the WA state government introduced a reservation policy, later known as the Domestic Gas Reservation (DGR) policy. The DGR policy requires new gas company developments to provide a 15 per cent reserve of Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) exports for the domestic market. According to its proponents, the DGR policy is intended to give domestic gas users access to a greater share of the benefits of the State’s gas reserves, to stimulate the WA economy, and to ensure that gas supplies in Western Australia are secure, reliable, and affordable for the State’s households and businesses. The DGR policy remains in place, but also under scrutiny. Critics of the DGR policy challenge whether the intervention is justified either in maintaining a reliable, secure gas supply to WA, or in its original aim, on the grounds of industry market power, and argue that the benefits to WA domestic gas consumers from the initiative are more than outweighed by the costs to the State in foregone export earnings and economic activity.

53

53

Electricity prices in Perth almost doubled between 2008 and 2014.

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Household utilities expenditure

Consumer price indices for public utilities such as electricity and gas are instructive in providing a picture of aggregate utility price inflation over a specified period, but they don’t easily translate either in to the dollar price of energy, or to real household energy expenditures.

WA’s Uniform Tariff Policy sets a common fixed supply charge (per day) and a variable electricity charge (per kilowatt hour of electricity) for all small user residential households in metropolitan Perth and regional WA3. Figure 38 shows the trajectory of charges for residential tariffs A1 and A2. The most noticeable feature being the near doubling of the fixed supply charge in July 2017, from 48.60c to 94.91c per day, an increase of 95 per cent on 2016’s fixed supply tariff.

Figure 38 Regulated residential electricity tariff charges for WA: July 2009 to July 2017

100

90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0

Cent

s pe

r day

Notes: Charges are for residential electricity Tariff A1 and A2. Supply charges are expressed in cents per day, and electricity charges presented in cents per Kilowatt/hour (kW/h).

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Energy Operators (Powers) Act 1979 - Energy Operators By-laws 2006 (WA).

July

200

9

July

201

0

July

201

1

July

201

2

July

201

3

July

201

4

July

201

5

July

201

6

July

201

7 Supply charge - cents per day Electricity charge - cents per unit (Kw/h)

17.611

32.329

20.8251

38.2291

21.8664

40.1405

24.8866

41.5455

23.5369

43.2072

27.0016

45.1516

25.7029

47.1834

26.474

48.5989

26.474

94.9058

54

WA’s fixed supply charge tariff nearly doubled in July 2017, from 48.60c to 94.91c per day, up 95 per cent on 2016’s supply tariff.

3 Subsidies from WA government, and Tariff Equalisation Contributions drawn from network charges in the South West Interconnected System, are used to support the Uniform Tariff Policy, given that supply costs to regional areas are higher relative to the more densely populated urban and inner regional areas of metropolitan Perth and the South West.

Table 5 Proportion of total energy consumption sourced from renewables, states and territories: 2008-09 to 2014-15

July2009

July2010

July2011

July2012

July2013

July2014

July2015

July2016

July2017

Weekly costs $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Supply Charge 2.26 2.68 2.81 2.91 3.02 3.16 3.30 3.40 6.64Usage Charge 18.49 21.87 22.96 26.13 24.71 28.35 26.99 27.80 27.80Total Charge 20.75 24.54 25.77 29.04 27.74 31.51 30.29 31.20 34.44Annual costs $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ $ Supply Charge 118 139 146 151 157 164 172 177 345Usage Charge 962 1,137 1,194 1,359 1,285 1,474 1,403 1,445 1,445Total Charge 1,079 1,276 1,340 1,510 1,442 1,639 1,575 1,622 1,791

Notes: Illustrative weekly residential household energy costs are calculated for households consuming 15kW/h on Tariff A1. Charges are those presented in Figure 38.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from WA Treasury (sources as for Figure 38).

The fixed supply and electricity charge tariffs translate to a household electricity cost according to the level of electricity consumed by a family in a given period. If a household consumed an illustrative average of 15kWh of electricity per day (Table 5), then their electricity bill in 2017 would be $34.44 per week, or $1,791 per year.

The progression of costs from 2009 to 2017 for a 15kWh per day rate of residential household consumption is shown in Figure 39, along with the annual percentage change in costs. The cost has risen from $1,079 to $1,791 in eight years, equivalent to a total (nominal) increase of 66 per cent. Indeed, costs have increased annually by more than than 10 per cent in four years – 2010, 2012, 2014 and 2017 – with the most recent increase of 10.4 per cent in 2017 caused by the near doubling of the fixed supply charge.

Figure 39 WA annual electricity costs: illustrative WA residential household, July 2009 to July 2017

2,000

1,800

1,600

1,400

1,200

1,000

800

600

400

200

0

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Annu

al l

Elec

tric

ity

cost

s ($

)

Supply Charge Usage Charge

Notes: Illustrative weekly residential household energy costs are calculated for households consuming an average of 15Kw/h per day on Tariff A1.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Energy Operators (Powers) Act 1979 - Energy Operators By-laws 2006 (WA).

1,07

989

%

1,27

689

%

1,34

089

%

1,51

090

%

1,44

289

%

1,63

990

%

1,57

589

%

1,62

289

%

1,79

181

%

11%

11%

11%

10%

11%

10%

11%

11% 19

%

+18.3%+5.0%

+12.7%+4.5%

+13.6% +3.9% +3.0%

+10.4%

55

55

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The WA government operates a one-off Hardship Utility Grant Scheme (HUGS) for households experiencing financial difficulties in paying their electricity, gas or other utilities bills. The HUGS scheme delivers up to $581 in hardship payments (equivalent to a third of the costs of 15kWh in electricity consumption), rising to $962 for residents living above the 26th parallel. HUGS payments are administered by utility providers for Commonwealth concession cardholders, while eligibility for those not holding a concessions card is contingent on them also signing up for financial counselling.

The rise in demand for HUGS grants, taken together with rising rates of customers going onto payment plans to service their debts and the growing number of disconnections are all indicators of increasing energy hardship in WA.

Household energy expenditure shares by incomeIn recent conversations about affordable energy, some commentators have argued that the typical share of household expenditure on electricity, gas and other household fuels is a modest 3 or 4 per cent of total spending, and imply (and in some cases, assert) that claims about the impact of rising energy costs on financial wellbeing are overstated.

New analysis in this BCEC Focus on Industry report reveals that this conjecture fails to recognise the significant impost that energy costs can have on the family budget. Figure 40 shows how the share of household energy spending at different levels of income, using a variant of the classic Engel expenditure share curve (named after the nineteenth century German statistician Ernst Engel).

(c) Single parents

Figure 40 WA household expenditure shares on utilities, by income percentile: 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15

(a) Couples, no children (b) Couples, with children

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

lone

per

sons

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

Shar

e of

lone

per

sons

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

Shar

e of

lone

per

sons

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

Shar

e of

lone

per

sons

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Utilities spending share - 2007-08 Utilities spending share - 2010-11 Utilities spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Utilities spending share - 2007-08 Utilities spending share - 2010-11 Utilities spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Utilities spending share - 2007-08 Utilities spending share - 2010-11 Utilities spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Utilities spending share - 2007-08 Utilities spending share - 2010-11 Utilities spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

(d) Lone persons

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

Percentile of equivalised household income

Percentile of equivalised household income

Percentile of equivalised household income

Percentile of equivalised household income

Notes: Household energy expenditure share schedules for each family type have been generated using local polynomial regression. The dotted lines for 2014/14 are confidence intervals to capture sampling variability. Household incomes (after housing costs) are scaled (equivalised) to control for family size. Separate schedules are presented for the three periods 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations using HILDA Waves 6 to 15.

56

The first clear finding from Figure 40 is that energy share costs rise substantially as incomes fall, for all family types. Energy expenditure shares can rise beyond 10 per cent of total spending for those families in the lowest tenth of the income distribution (below the 10th percentile). This compares with energy cost shares of 3 per cent for typical families on middle incomes (around the 50th percentile) and below 2 per cent for those families with incomes in the top quarter (above the 75th percentile).

In fact, energy cost shares have risen over time for certain family groups. The red and orange schedules in Figure 40, which show energy cost shares in 2011-12 and 2014-15 respectively, are higher than the blue cost schedule for 2007-08. This is especially the case for single parent families (Panel c of Figure 40), and aligns closely with findings reported in two recent studies into energy poverty by BCEC (Cordwell et al, 2016) and by the Victorian Council of Social Services (VCOSS, 2017).

57

57

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Power

Energy is an absolute essential to attain, and maintain, a basic quality of life. In managing the household budget, families strive for a roof over their heads, food on the table, healthcare, decent clothing for themselves and their children - and power. Energy provides a means by which people to heat their homes, prepare their meals, remain connected to their friends and communities, and access goods and services. So how do we make sure no one is left behind?

Figure 40 makes very clear that appealing to the notion of ‘typical’ household energy spending fails to recognise that for many families on low incomes, especially those with dependent children, the cost of energy is significant. For some, the financial burden of meeting housing and energy costs forces them to compromise on other expenditure items.

The next section of this BCEC Focus on Industry report provides an more in-depth examination of energy expenditure in Western Australia. We compare actual spending by different families in Western Australia to their comparators in other states and territories, and how this spending has changed over time. We also assess the share of households for whom energy spending represents a significant financial burden.

60

For many families on low incomes, the cost of energy is significant and forces them to compromise on other expenditure items.

Household energy costs and energy poverty

61

61

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Table 6 compares the average weekly household expenditure on electricity, gas and other heating fuels for different family types, and across states and territories, using the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey, with expenditure data uprated to July 2017. Western Australian households rank fifth overall in energy spending at an overall weekly average of $40.64. Couples with children spend more per week on energy than other family types, at an average of $49.31 per week. Single parent families spend $37.23 on energy costs, the second highest in value terms and higher still in income share terms given the lower typical incomes for this equity group.

Australia’s two territories rank highest in terms of average household energy expenditure, followed by Victoria and South Australia. These jurisdictional differences aren’t driven solely by energy costs, with some of the difference attributable to variations in climate, and the consequent use of heating or air conditioning.

Table 6 Average household energy spending, by state/territory & family type, uprated to June 2017

Couples, no children

Couples with children

Single parents

Lone persons

Other households

All family types

$ p/w $ p/w $ p/w $ p/w $ p/w $ p/wNorthern Territory (a) 54.30 2 56.28 3 45.36 2 24.56 4 33.78 7 52.21 1

Australian Capital Territory 56.04 1 52.91 4 46.50 1 23.88 5 35.89 3 50.77 2

Victoria 41.35 3 56.31 2 42.56 4 29.27 1 36.10 2 46.54 3

South Australia 37.09 4 56.39 1 42.57 3 26.19 2 52.99 1 44.84 4

Western Australia 34.20 5 49.31 5 37.23 6 23.50 6 34.18 6 40.64 5

New South Wales 33.97 6 47.88 6 36.33 7 23.21 7 35.40 4 39.65 6

Tasmania 28.94 7 46.78 7 38.38 5 25.76 3 35.15 5 37.21 7

Queensland 25.79 8 42.92 8 28.33 8 18.65 8 32.86 8 33.79 8

Notes: Household weekly expenditure on energy is calculated for each family type using HILDA waves 14 and 15. Data are uprated to July 2017 using CPI. (a) Results for Northern Territory should be treated with caution due to small sample size.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations using HILDA Waves 14 and 15.

Looking at Western Australian households in particular, Table 7 shows how average real household spending has changed in the State over the ten years since 2006-07. The largest growth in spending by WA households occurred between 2008-09 and 2010-11, rising by around $6.50 on average across all family types to $39.76 in the two years to 2010-11 in today’s prices. Energy spending has been relatively stable as an overall average since then, but for single parents the increase in spending has been far more acute – up 39 per cent in real terms over ten years, and 10 per cent over the last two years alone.

Table 7 Average household spending on utilities in WA: by family type, 2006-07 to 2014-15

2006-07 2008-09 2010-11 2012-13 2014-15$ p/w $ p/w $ p/w $ p/w $ p/w

Couple only 29.86 32.19 35.72 35.88 34.20 Couple with kids 39.20 37.87 45.52 49.41 49.31 One parent with kids 26.79 31.84 33.78 35.96 37.23 Lone person 19.25 20.72 21.50 22.16 23.50 Other households 27.79 19.46 43.68 24.40 34.18 All family types 33.43 33.21 39.76 40.83 40.64

Notes: Household weekly expenditure on energy is calculated for each family type using HILDA waves 14 and 15. Data are uprated to July 2017 using CPI.Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from HILDA.

As noted earlier, a focus just on average or typical spending conceals some wide variations in spending patterns for different family groups. To give more of an idea of the spread of energy spending commitments for WA households, Figure 41 reports the distribution of household energy expenditure shares using HILDA data for 2014-15. The typical (or “median”) energy cost shares are around 4.7 per cent overall for all household types, 4.6 per cent for single parent households and 4.8 per cent for couples with children. However, the spread of energy cost shares vary markedly by family type.

Single parents in particular commit to a far wider spread of energy expenditure as a share of after housing cost incomes. Around a quarter of single parents commit at least 10.2 per cent of their income towards energy costs, and one in ten spend at least 15.1 per cent.

Figure 41 Variation in household utility expenditure shares in WA, by family type: 2009 to 2017

State Lower Typical Higher

Percentiles 10th 25th 50th 75th 90th

Couple only 1.5 2.9 4.3 6.5 9.3

Couple with kids 1.9 3.3 4.8 6.7 9.5

One parent with kids 1.8 2.8 4.6 10.2 15.1

Lone person 1.4 3.1 5.2 8.1 12.2

Group household 0.4 2.9 4.6 8.3 10.0

Other one/multi households 3.5 4.3 5.6 7.8 10.8

All households 1.8 3.2 4.7 6.9 10.1

Other one/multi households

Group household

Lone person

One parent with kids

Couple with kids

Couple only

All households

0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16

Fam

ily T

ype

Spread of household energy expenditure shares

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from HILDA.

62

High energy cost burdens materially affect households’ capacities either to cover heating costs, or in seeking to do so, to afford other household spending necessities. Figure 42 shows the share of WA households who report that they spend more than 10 per cent of their incomes on energy – a standard measure of ‘energy poverty’. The growth in the prevalence of high energy cost shares over time is quite apparent from these results, and for certain equity groups – especially for single parents, and older single men and women - the rate of growth in energy poverty has been significant.

Figure 42 Shares of WA households with more than 10 per cent of expenditure on utilities: by family type: 2006-07 to 2014-15

30

25

20

15

10

5

0Shar

e of

fam

ilies

for w

hom

ene

rgy

cost

s (e

xc.m

otor

fuel

) are

m

ore

than

10%

of t

otal

spe

ndin

g aft

er h

ousi

ng c

osts

(%)

2006-07 2010-11 2014-15

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from HILDA.

5.2

3.8

7.1

6.2

8.2

7.7

13.5

8.0 8.

6

5.3

9.2

6.7

10.2 11

.3

10.9

9.3

18.9 20

.9

19.8

9.010

.2

7.5

26.2

14.7

13.2

6.3

14.9

22.3

13.4

10.2

Non-elderly couple only

Non-elderly couple

with kids

Non-elderly couple

with kids

One parent

with kids

Non-elderly single female

Non-elderly single female

Elderly couple

Elderly single male

Elderly single female

Group/other

households

In a recent speech, John Durkan, Managing Director of the Coles supermarket chain, claimed that high energy costs were forcing people to compromise on either the quality or quantity of the food they buy – less fresh food, more cheaper options - or simply less food.

There is some evidence to support this claim. Figure 43 looks at how the shares of spending by WA single parents on energy, health and groceries vary both by income, and over time. As noted earlier, the share of income devoted to spending on energy has risen over time for low income single parents – as shown by the orange schedule in Panel (a) of Figure 43 for 2014-15 sitting above the red and blue curves for energy spending in earlier years. The share of household spending on groceries has fallen over the same period at most levels of income, and for health spending, those single parents on the lowest incomes have reduced their spending shares since 2007-08.

63

63

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Figure 43 Share of spending on utilities, health and groceries by WA single parents, by income percentile: 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15

Notes: Household energy expenditure share schedules for each family type have been generated using local polynomial regression. The dotted lines for 2014-15 are confidence intervals to capture sampling variability. Household incomes (after housing costs) are scaled (equivalised) to control for family size. Separate schedules are presented for the three periods 2007-08, 2011-12 and 2014-15.

Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from HILDA.

12

10

8

6

4

2

0

-2Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

sin

gle

pare

nts

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

(b) Health and pharmaceuticals

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

Percentile of equivalised household income

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Health spending share - 2007-08 Health spending share - 2010-11 Health spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

12

10

8

6

4

2

0Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

sin

gle

pare

nts

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

(a) Utilities

36

30

24

18

12

6

0

Percentile of equivalised household income

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Utilities spending share - 2007-08 Utilities spending share - 2010-11 Utilities spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0Shar

e of

inco

me

devo

ted

to e

lect

ricit

y,

gas

and

utili

ties

exp

endi

ture

(%)

Shar

e of

sin

gle

pare

nts

in p

erce

ntile

ra

nge

(%)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100

(c) Groceries

50

45

40

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Percentile of equivalised household income

(RHS) Relative share of lone persons Food spending share - 2007/8 Food spending share - 2010-11 Food spending share - 2014-15 Upper ci Lower ci

64

Households’ access to solar technologies

65

65

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

In earlier discussions, we noted the rapid growth in household rooftop Solar PV installations. In Western Australia, the combined capacity of distributed household rooftop solar currently amounts to some 730MW in electricity generation, equivalent to the capacity output of one of the state's largest power stations and one tenth of the state's total electricity generation capacity from non-renewable fuel. By 2020, distributed electricity generation is forecast to grow to 2,000MW.

Set against a background of rising energy costs, part of the ongoing debate on the future of energy highlights the trend for more households to move `off-grid' through Solar PV installations. With more use of emerging technologies in battery storage, distributed generation, this future direction includes a greater potential for households to produce as well as consume electricity, either to the current grid, or through new micro-grids, with exchange facilitated by new developments in blockchain (Green and Newman, 2017a).

To address high energy costs, households can be encouraged to manage energy usage by modifying energy consumption behaviours or through smart metering solutions. While WA currently operates a fixed electricity tariff structure, consumers in other states are incentivised to take advantage of peak and off-peak tariff charges. But some emerging technologies are not as yet accessible to all equity groups. Going `off the grid', installing Solar PV - ideally with storage solutions - sound compelling, but for many householders, such technology is inaccessible, either because they can't afford the up-front costs, because they live in rented accommodation, or because their properties are not suitable for solar installations.

Figure 44 Share of suitable WA dwellings with rooftop Solar PV installed: to June 2017, by level of socioeconomic disadvantage

35

30

25

20

15

10

5

0

Shar

e of

sui

tabl

e dw

ellin

gs w

ith ro

oftop

sol

ar P

V (%

)

2001-2015 2016 2017

Notes: Dwellings deemed suitable for Solar PV installation currently include separate houses, or semi-detached row or terraced houses, a classification that follows ABS Cat.No 4631.0 (Table 11). Local Government Areas are classified into deciles of the SEIFA Index of Relative Socio-Economic Advantage and Disadvantage using 2011 Census data collated in Abs Cat. 2033.0. The number of Solar PV installations in each LGA are aggregated from postcode level using ABS concordances.

Source: Authors' calculations using Clean Energy Regulator data on solar PV by postcode to June 2017, ABS Census 2011 and 2016 data, and Abs Cat. 2033.0.

Decile 1(lowest)

Decile 2 Decile 3 Decile 4 Decile 5 Decile 6 Decile 7 Decile 8 Decile 9 Decile 10(highest)

All

Level of socioeconomic advantage(Decile of SEIFA index of Relative Socioeconomic Advantage and Disadvantage (IRSAD)

7.4

16.0

18.821.1

29.4 28.7 28.9 28.930.9

21.5

27.3

To see this, Figure 44 presents estimates of the share of `suitable' properties with rooftop Solar PV installations across Local Government Authority (LGA) areas in Western Australia, but where LGAs are in addition classified in deciles according to the level of socio-economic disadvantage - the lower the decile, the greater the local area disadvantage.

Figure 44 shows there to be a very clear socio-economic gradient in household solar installations in Western Australia, with rooftop Solar PV installed in only 7.4 per cent of suitable dwellings in areas in the lowest socio-economic decile, and 16 per cent of suitable houses in the second lowest decile. The share of WA households with Solar PV installations rises and flattens to around 30 per cent for mid to high socioeconomic areas (deciles 5 and upwards).

New household Solar PV installations across Western Australia in 2016 - shown in maroon in Figure 44 - acted to reduce some of this socioeconomic gradient. Nevertheless, WA still has a good way to go to match other states in terms of equity of households' access to Solar PV across the socioeconomic spectrum.

Comparing Western Australia with other states and territories (Table 8), the State ranks third in the share of suitable dwellings with Solar PV installed - an estimated 27.3 per cent to June 2017. Queensland ranks top on this overall measure, at 33.7 per cent, followed by South Australia at 33.2 per cent. However, the uptake of household Solar PV in WA's lower socioeconomic areas (the bottom three deciles in Table 8) does lag behind almost all other state jurisdictions. Greater access to renewable energy options is something WA should seek to address in moving to a new energy landscape.

Table 8 Shares of suitable WA dwellings with rooftop Solar PV installed: to June 2017, by state/territory and level of socioeconomic disadvantage

Share of suitable dwellings with rooftop Solar PV installationsState or territory

Level of disadvantage NSW Vic QLD SA WA Tas NTDecile 1 (most disadvantaged) 16.5% 0.0% 4.2% 29.7% 7.4% 21.2% 0.0%Decile 2 20.6% 14.0% 36.1% 30.4% 16.0% 11.0% 12.7%Decile 3 21.8% 18.5% 28.7% 34.7% 18.8% 13.7% 3.2%Decile 4 21.0% 21.4% 30.3% 34.3% 21.1% 15.0% 5.5%Decile 5 20.3% 18.5% 38.4% 33.0% 29.4% 15.6% 0.8%Decile 6 16.4% 19.3% 26.2% 38.5% 28.7% 11.1% 7.3%

Decile 7 16.0% 16.8% 37.9% 31.8% 28.9% 14.4% 10.9%

Decile 8 12.0% 19.8% 35.5% 62.2% 28.9% 13.6% 18.1%Decile 9 14.4% 13.6% 30.5% 31.6% 30.9% 15.4% 11.6%Decile 10 (most advantaged) 11.6% 10.7% 0.7% 30.7% 21.5% 0.0% 5.8%All 16.8% 16.2% 33.7% 33.2% 27.3% 14.0% 12.3%

Notes: Illustrative weekly residential household energy costs are calculated for households consuming 15kW/h on Tariff A1. Charges are those presented in Figure 38. Source: Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre | Authors’ calculations from WA Treasury (sources as for Figure 38).

66

WA’s Energy Future: Summary and Discussion

WA’s Energy Future: Summary and Discussion

For this second report in the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre’s Focus on Industry series, we look at a sector facing arguably the most significant transformation in its lifetime – the energy sector.

Australian states have experienced significant price rises in recent years. We now have some of the most expensive power in the world, and energy hardship is an emerging national concern. At the same time, the way in which we produce, distribute and consume electricity is changing rapidly with the advent of ‘disruptive’ technologies and the move to a decentralised grid.

We are on the cusp of an energy revolution. But are we ready for the journey? Do we know what to expect on the way? And do we have a clear roadmap to take us to the new energy future?

The report looks at the current energy landscape in Western Australia, looks at our innovation and productivity capabilities, and our preparedness for the energy revolution now upon us. The report highlights the key challenges, risks and policy issues requiring attention to ensure that WA’s energy system provides reliable power to the state’s households and businesses at the right time, in the right place, and at a price that all can afford.

68

Evolution of the WA energy sector

69

69

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The Western Australian energy sector is already different from those in other state and territory jurisdictions. Our isolation from the Eastern states saw WA’s energy market develop separately from the national energy grid, building reliable and resilient generation capacity. Yet this hasn’t protected the state from the national affliction of electricity and gas price inflation.

For Western Australia, some key drivers of rising energy prices have included:

• the period of rapid population growth and industry expansion;

• significant investment in network infrastructure and generation capacity, coupled with an over-prediction of energy demand

• costs of maintenance upgrades to bring the state’s transmission system up to standard, adding to cost pressures from rising wholesale energy prices

• an overestimation of demand for network electricity, linked to a failure to foresee the extent of household investment in rooftop Solar PV.

The structural shift in WA energy demand in 2010 was not predicted to occur at anything like the pace that eventuated. In no sense was this specific to Western Australia; the AEMC regards over-forecasting of energy demands to have occurred all across Australia. Over-forecasting of demand led to excess capacity and short-run pressure on energy prices.

Many energy experts trace the origins of recent increases in energy prices back to overly optimistic forecasts of future demands for network electricity at the start of the decade, caused in large part by a significant underestimation of household take-up of solar PV installations and advances in energy efficiency.

• Greater infrastructure cost commitments require demand to grow to maintain energy price stability, but instead, the combination of falling demand and rising infrastructure costs led to reverse economies of scale in which a greater share of fixed and sunk costs are borne by a smaller share of electricity consumers. The structural drop in electricity demand in Western Australia created excess capacity that some energy economists have estimated at up to 1000MW - the equivalent of three 300MW power stations.

The future energy landscape

This Focus on Industry report finds that Western Australia currently lags well behind other states and territories when it comes to investment in large-scale renewable energy capacity. The drive towards renewables has been led by households who have responded to energy prices by moving to rooftop solar PV systems, some 730MW in aggregated capacity.

Emerging technologies and falling prices for solar PV and battery storage are disrupting the traditional utility business model and opening up possibilities for new models – including more localised and distributes solutions like micro-grids, precinct scale responses and ‘citizen utilities’. Energy companies are now facing some stark choices – they can innovate and adapt to the new world, or look for their way out … but at some point existing energy assets are likely to become stranded and business as usual will no longer be an option.

A fundamental change in the mix of energy sources towards renewables is clearly part of WA’s energy future. But there remains work to be done to increase the level of generation relative to capacity for renewable energy sources – and hence it is hard to see a medium-term future for energy that doesn’t involve traditional non-renewable generation in some form.

The solution requires innovative localised responses through citizen utilities and the development of new residential precincts incorporating renewable energy generation at scale; innovation and adaptation from large energy utilities to new business models; and regulations and policy settings that ensure the most efficient price transition to a new energy future with effective protections for customers’ basic rights to ensure that no-one is left behind.

Efficient, cost-effective storage solutions for renewable (but variable) wind and solar energy will be a game changer for the energy sector. So too will be the advent of new technologies that can dispatch power from renewable stored energy to the grid, at scale and at a rate that responds to peak load demands.

Electricity production capabilities are still largely tied to power generation that needs to respond to the different load demands between peak and shoulder periods in the morning and evening, and off peak periods at night and during the middle of the day.

Gas turbines and reciprocating gas generators currently fill this role, supplementing base load generation from coal-fired power stations that deliver cheaper electricity but can’t so easily be ‘turned up and down’ to match time of day variation in load.

Although the marginal cost of wind and solar power is low, the costs of maintaining a generation contingency to cover peak load demands, downtime or failure, and variations in climate necessarily add to the electricity price.

But with storage solutions that can dispatch power to the network at scale to meet variable residential electricity demands, there is an opportunity for power generation - from either from renewable or non-renewable sources – to be uncoupled from load demands.

This offers the enticing prospect of more efficient utilisation of productive capacity - and a reduction in redundant capacity – which would massively contribute to reduced energy prices.

70

Energy affordability

71

71

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

Affordable energy provides the means by which people to heat their homes, remain connected to their friends and communities, and access goods and services. Yet this report finds that energy affordability remains an issue for many families, and for many, a growing issue.

Our findings show that high energy costs impose a significant burden for many households, especially those on low incomes. Single parents, and older age single men and women are more likely to be in energy poverty. A quarter of single parents in WA spend more than a tenth of their after-housing costs income on electricity, gas and heating, with one in ten spending 15 per cent or more. And there is evidence that some families are compromising on other essentials to meet rising energy costs, including food and healthcare.

So how do we make sure no one is left behind?

Time-of-use tariff arrangements (with higher costs in peak and shoulder periods) would incentive households with solar PV and storage to draw electricity from ‘behind the meter’ to see them through to the low cost tariff period.

However, households without solar PV access could be left to face peak period pricing – and our research shows that more of these families are already at higher socioeconomic disadvantage. The potential for a separation of energy markets separation on socioeconomic lines is a concern that must be countered in any future energy market arrangements.

New developments in technology have the potential to smooth the peaks and troughs of electricity load at the network, precinct or household level through efficient and dispatchable power storage. The challenge is to get the incentive settings right, ensuring least cost options applicable to different environments, and to households in different socioeconomic circumstances.

What does the Finkel Review mean for WA?

A number of the recommendations in the Finkel Review are already in play in Western Australia.

By virtue of WA’s isolation from the National Energy Market, the state’s energy network already includes system infrastructure with relatively high levels of security. The greater challenge regarding the Finkel recommendations is the need to ensure that the state’s interests are kept at the forefront of the management and oversight of Australia’s electricity system.

The Finkel report supports carbon pricing as a means to accelerate low emissions targets and price externalities associated with emissions, but is agnostic on the question of tariff structures. This may be an important part of the story, creating behaviours that can improve efficiencies in the electricity system but without imposing cost burdens on families at greatest socioeconomic disadvantage. There has also been significant public concern regarding tariff arrangements in play in some states and territories that are often less than transparent, and that invite confusion and uncertainty on the part of consumers.

The Finkel recommendation relating to market oversight calls for a national energy security panel. However, given the fundamental transitions underway in energy markets nationally, and given the recent concern regarding rising energy prices, the scope of this panel seems too narrow. Rather, we need a panel that looks holistically at security, reliability and affordability in the context of a changing energy landscape.

72

Regulation

73

73

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

The energy market is exceptionally complex, probably more so than any other market, and far from the economic notion of a ‘perfectly competitive’ market with demand, supply and price converging efficiently. The case for effective regulation is all the more imperative in Western Australia given the rapid changes taking place in the state’s energy markets from ‘disruptive’ technologies, growth in distributed electricity generation, and a rising share of producer-consumer households.

With regulation and planning functions for the wholesale electricity market recently transferred to AEMO, one concern for Western Australia has been to ensure that the national body retains local knowledge of the WA energy system, and ensures that energy reliability, security and affordability to WA households and businesses remain at the forefront of any rule or regulatory changes.

WA’s regulatory framework needs to be future-proofed, flexible and adaptable to different energy futures. With more distributed electricity generation, and the emergence of new possibilities for distribution and trade, it seems inevitable that the regulatory landscape will have to change.

It is tempting to imagine that our energy future will include a far lighter touch to regulation. But this ignores some of the core features of a market characterised by risk and uncertainty, challenges in predicting future demand trends, and in meeting variable demands, imperfect competition and market power by large scale industry players. All provide conditions for some form of regulatory intervention.

As part of the intervention framework, subsidies need to be carefully considered in terms of their base rationale, impact on market competitiveness, and coverage of different energy sources. We need to be careful to consider all criteria by which intervention and regulation should be judged – affordability, security, reliability, efficiency and equity.

And whatever direction is taken, it is important not to lose sight of the fact that regulatory systems are in large part about consumer protection. It is critical that such protections remain in place as energy markets evolve, however large the place of distributed generation in the energy future.

A roadmap to our energy future

The journey to Western Australia’s energy future requires clear leadership and a collaborative approach from all stakeholders to transformation, adaptation and change. The greatest challenge is to agree on solutions that will improve affordability and breadth of access, and defend against the risks of a bifurcation of electricity markets in which households in socioeconomic disadvantage are either excluded from the benefits of new technologies or bear higher electricity costs as a result.

To navigate the journey effectively, we need a clear roadmap, one that integrates existing and emerging energy technologies from non-renewable and renewable power sources, as well as the huge and growing latent capacities of household solar PV installations.

An important part of the journey towards improved affordability is to optimise productive capacities of all platforms while maintaining equity, reliability, security, and minimising negative externalities. This will ensure that prices are as competitive as possible, and reflect the most efficient, equitable use of resources that also deliver on environmental low-emissions targets.

Another challenge is to manage the risks associated with non-renewable stranded assets losing value as the move to non-renewable sources gathers pace.

From our reading of the array of contributions on the topic, the current debate on the future of energy points to a highly contested space.

This emphasises the importance of leadership, informed by the best knowledge and insights from research, business and community stakeholders, to optimise and integrate all energy technologies (existing, developing and emerging) within a less adversarial conversation.

Western Australia needs a clear statement of direction to navigate a way through the energy revolution that’s upon us. This will give greater certainty to the energy future we can all expect – and critically, ensure that no one is left behind.

Our energy future should be one that really does provide Power to All the People.

74

Glossaryand Technical Notes

Glossary and Technical Notes

Gross Value Added (GVA)Gross Value Added is the measure of the value of goods and services produced in an area, industry or sector of an economy. In national accounts, GVA is output minus intermediate consumption.

Gross State Product (GSP)Gross State Product (GSP) is a measure of the economic output of a state, province or region, and serves as the counterpart to gross domestic product for a country. Conceptually, GSP is measured on the same basis as GDP, although there are practical difficulties in measuring ‘import’ and ‘export’ flows across state boundaries, and attributing state-specific income accruing from factors of production in national and multinational firms.

Watt hour (Wh)Watt hour is a derived unit of energy used or produced in one hour period. Typically, consumption of a 40” LED TV that runs for one hour will be 40 watt hour. There are a number of incremental units of measurement for energy, namely Kilo, Mega, Giga, Tera, Peta, Exa and etc. From each scale to next there is 1,000 unit jump. Therefore, one Kilowatt hour (KWh) will be 1,000 Watt hour and one Megawatt hour (MWh) will be 1,000 KWh, one Gigawatt hour is 1,000 MWh or 106 KWh. Terawatt hour and Petawatt hour are large scales used for aggregated values. One Terawatt hour is 1,000 MWh and one Petawatt hour is 1,000 Terawatt hour.

Joule (J)According to the International System of Units, Joule is a unit of energy equivalent to one watt for one second and therefore one joule is 1/3600 of a watt-hour. Joule is used more often to measure thermal energy or derived energy in physics. Similar to any other units of measurement there are incremental scales such as Kilo, Mega and etc. Joule can be converted to watt as well by considering that 1 watt hour is 3,600 joules or 1 joule is 0.000277778 watt hour.

Solar PVA Photo Voltaic (PV) system consists of an arrangement of several components, including solar panels to absorb and convert sunlight into electricity.

Bio energyBioenergy is renewable energy made available from materials derived from biological sources.

Hybrid energyA hybrid energy system, or hybrid power, usually consists of two or more renewable energy sources used together to provide increased system efficiency as well as greater balance in energy supply.

76

77

77

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

AbbreviationsABS: Australian Bureau of Statistics

AER: Australian Energy Regulator

AEMC: Australian Energy Market Commission

AEMO: Australian Energy Market Operator

AER: Australian Energy Regulator

GJ: Gigajoules

GW: Gigawatt

GWh: Gigawatt-hours

kW: Kilowatt

kWh: Kilowatt-hours

LNG: Liquefied natural gas

LPG: Liquefied petroleum gas

MW: Megawatts

MWh: Megawatt-hours

NEM: National electricity market

OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development OPEC Organization

PJ: Petajoules

SGU: Solar Generation Unit

SWH: Solar Water Heater

WEM: Western Australian Electricity Market

References

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2009), Alternative View of Electricity and Gas Supply Activity, ABS Cat No. 4647.0.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2012a), Australian System of National Accounts: Concepts, Sources and Methods, Australia, 2012, Edition 3, Cat. no. 5216.0.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016), Australian System of National Accounts, 2015-16, ABS Cat No. 5204.0

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016b), Australian National Accounts: National Income, Expenditure and Product, ABS Cat No. 5206.0

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016c), Australian National Accounts: State Accounts, 2015-16, ABS Cat No. 5220.0

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017), Labour Force, Australia, Detailed - Electronic Delivery, Jun 2017, ABS Cat No. 6291.0.55.001.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017a), Labour Force, Jul 2017, ABS Cat No. 6202.

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2017b), Labour Force, Labour Force, Australia, Detailed, Quarterly, May 2017, ABS Cat No. 6291.0.55.003.

Australian Energy Market Operator (2013), 100 per cent renewables study - Modelling outcomes.

Australian Energy Regulator(2017), State of the Energy Market May 2017, Australian Energy Regulator

BNEF (2017), New Energy Outlook 2017, Bloomberg New Energy Finance,

Cornwell, A., Hejazi Amin, M., Houghton, T., Jefferson, T., Newman, P., & Rowley, S. (2016). Energy poverty in Western Australia: A comparative analysis of drivers and effects.

Department of Environment (2017), Quarterly Update of Australia’s National Greenhouse Gas Inventory: March 2017. Incorporating NEM electricity emissions up to June 2017.

Department of Industry, Innovation and Science (2016), Australian Energy Statistics: July 2017.

Elliston, B., L. MacGill, and M. Diesendorf (2013), Least cost 100% renewable electricity scenarios in the Australian National Electricity Market. Energy Policy, 2013. 59: p. 270-282.

Elliston, B., J. Riesz, and L. MacGill (2016), ‘What cost for more renewables? The incremental cost of renewable generation - An Australian National Electricity Market case study’. Renewable Energy 95: p. 127-139

Finkel, A., Munro, C., Effeney, T. and O’Kane, M., (2017). Independent Review into the Future Security of the National Electricity Market: Blueprint for the Future. Department of the Environment and Energy.

80

Green, J. & Newman, P., (2017). Citizen utilities: The emerging power paradigm. Energy Policy, 105, pp.283-293.

Green, J., & Newman, P. (2017). Disruptive innovation, stranded assets and forecasting: the rise and rise of renewable energy. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 7(2), 169-187.Lenzen, M.,

McBain, B., Trainer, T., Jütte, S., Rey-Lescure, O. and Huang, J.,( 2016). Simulating low-carbon electricity supply for Australia. Applied Energy, 179, pp.553-564.

REN21 (2017a) Renewables 2017: Global Status Report

REN21 (2017b) Renewables Global Futures Report: Great Debates Towards 100% Renewable Energy

Sapphire (2017) Sapphire Wind Farm Newsletter, May 2017

VACOSS (2017) , Power struggles, Melbourne, Australia: http://vcoss.org.au/documents/2017/08/POWER-STRUGGLES.pdf

81

81

POWER TO THE PEOPLE WA’s Energy Future

82

Disclaimer

While every effort has been made to ensure the accuracy of this document, the uncertain nature of economic data, forecasting and analysis means that the centre, Curtin University and/or Bankwest are unable to make any warranties in relation to the information contained herein. Any person who relies on the information contained in this document does so at their own risk. The centre, Curtin University, Bankwest, and/or their employees and agents disclaim liability for any loss or damage, which may arise as a consequence of any person relying on the information contained in this document. Except where liability under any statute cannot be excluded, the centre, Curtin University, Bankwest and/or their advisors, employees and officers do not accept any liability (whether under contract, tort or otherwise) for any resulting loss or damage suffered by the reader or by any other person.

The views in this publication are those of the authors and do not represent the views of Curtin University and/or Bankwest or any of their affiliates. This publication is provided as general information only and does not consider anyone’s specific objectives, situation or needs. Neither the authors nor the centre accept any duty of care or liability to anyone regarding this publication or any loss suffered in connection with the use of this publication or any of its content.

Authorised Use

© Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre, August 2017Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre Focus on Industry Report SeriesISBN: 978-1-925086-68

This report was written by: Rebecca Cassells, Alan Duncan and Yashar Tarverdi from the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre at Curtin Business School.

It can be cited as: Cassells R, Duncan A, Tarverdi Y (2017), ‘Power to the People: WA’s Energy Future’, Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre, Focus on Industry Series, Issue #2, August 2017.

The authors would like to thank: Chris Twomey, John Hewson and Steven Bond-Smith, as well as numerous stakeholders from the policy and business community for their insights and contribution to the report.

This report uses unit record data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey. The HILDA Project was initiated and is funded by the Australian Government Department of Social Services (DSS) and is managed by the Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research (Melbourne Institute). The findings and views reported in this paper, however, are those of the authors and should not be attributed to either DSS or the Melbourne Institute.

This publication contains confidential and proprietary information of the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre. All of the material in this publication is for your exclusive use and may not be otherwise used or modified for, or by, any other person or sold to or otherwise provided in whole or in part to any other person or entity without the prior written consent of the Bankwest Curtin Economics Centre.

A standard hard copy of, or electronic subscription to, this publication entitles employees of the same organisation and same physical location as the subscriber to the use of its contents for internal reporting purposes only. Multiple user licenses are available for organisations with more than one location.

bcec.edu.au

Bankwest Curtin Economics CentreTel: +61 8 9266 2873 Email: [email protected]

© Curtin University of Technology 2017CRICOS Provider Code 00301JADV100614

Contact


Recommended