+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Baranski

Baranski

Date post: 19-Jun-2015
Category:
Upload: arne-broering
View: 882 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
13
Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud B. Baranski*, T. Deelmann and B. Schäffer Institute for Geoinformatics University of Münster, Germany
Transcript
Page 1: Baranski

Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for

Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud

B. Baranski*, T. Deelmann and B. Schäffer

Institute for Geoinformatics

University of Münster, Germany

Page 2: Baranski

Agenda

• Motivation

• Requirements

• System Design

• Demonstration

• Conclusion

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 2

Page 3: Baranski

Motivation

• Evolution of GIS

• data- and desktop-centric GIS

• emerging technologies (SOA, web services)

• Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) concept

• Geoprocessing

• OGC Web Processing Service (WPS)

• proprietary and complex desktop-software

• increasing amount of data and higher requirements on adopted algorithms

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 3

Page 4: Baranski

Challenges

• Quality of Service (QoS)

• INSPIRE QoS requirements

• Cloud Computing

• general trend in mainstream-IT

• on-demand resource provisioning

• pay-per-use revenue models

• no up-front infrastructure investments

Emerging Business Models

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 4

Page 5: Baranski

Goal

• Design a system that

• enables (OGC-) service providers to providesustainable pay-per-use business models

• define usage costs per service request, serviceuptime, accessed resource, executed process, amount of processed data, etc.

• enables (OGC-) service consumers to comparecost-benefit ratio of different service offerings

Applicable for all kind of (OGC-) services … but focus on Geoprocessing Services

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 5

Page 6: Baranski

Requirements

• Payment Models

• flatrate vs. pay-per-use

• Contract Models

• click-through licenses vs. long term contracts

• Accounting Models

• post-paid vs. pre-paid

• Pricing Models

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 6

Page 7: Baranski

Requirements

• Publish-Find-Bind

• additional agree phase (Publish-Find-Agree-Bind)

• OGC Technical Baseline

• existing client and service implementations shouldremain unchanged

• Security and Trust

• authentication, authorization, confidentiality, integrity, non-repudiation, protection and privacy

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 7

Page 8: Baranski

System Design

• Policy-Based Management Architecture

• OGC GeoDRM RM / OGC-Testbeds

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 8

WS-PolicySOAP-wrapped OGC-requests

SAML

AWS-Java API

XACML

Page 9: Baranski

Demonstration

• Scenario 1: Pay-per-“Process-Execution“

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 9

Page 10: Baranski

Demonstration

• Scenario 2: Service Hosting

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 10

Page 11: Baranski

Conclusion

• Design a system that

• enables service providers to provide sustainable pay-per-use business models

• Enables service consumers to compare cost-benefitratio of different service offerings

• Impact on SDIs

• technological shift vs. paradigm change

• new business opportunities

• for small companies (no up-front investments)

• *real* Software as a Service (SaaS)

Cloud Computing as enabling technologie!B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 11

Page 12: Baranski

Conclusion

• Open Issues

• Cloud Computing

• interoperability

• reliability

• security

• Business Models

• software licenses

B. Baranski Pay-per-Use Revenue Models for Geoprocessing Services in the Cloud 12


Recommended