+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Barriers of Elearning

Barriers of Elearning

Date post: 07-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: karan-m-patel
View: 220 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
15
 eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 1 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542  Communities of Practice and virtual learning communities: benefits, barriers and success factors Pat Gannon-Leary, Northumbria University, United Kingdom Elsa Fontainha, ISEG – Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal  Summary  AvirtualCommunityo fPractice(CoP)isanetw orkofindividuals whoshareadomainof interestaboutwhichtheycommunicateonline.Thepractitione rsshareresource s(for exampleexpe riences,problemsandsolutions,tools,me thodologies).Suc hcommunication resultsintheimpro vementoftheknow ledgeofeachpa rticipantinthecommunityand contributestothede velopmentofthekn owledgewithi nthedomain.Avirtuall earning communitymayinvo lvetheconductofori ginalresearchbutitismorelikelythatitsmain purposeistoincre asetheknowle dgeofparticipants,via formaleducation orprofessional development.Virtua llearningcommu nitiescouldhavele arningastheirma ingoalorthee- learningcouldbegeneratedasasideeffect.  Virtualcommunitie sofpractice(CoPs)an dvirtuallearningco mmunitiesarebecom ing widespreadw ithinhighereduca tioninstitutions(HE Is)thankstotechnolog icaldevelopme nts whichenablein creasedcommu nication,interactivityamongparticipan tsandincorporatio nof collaborativeped agogicalmode ls,specificallythroughi nformationcommu nications technologies(ICTs )Theyaffordthepote ntialforthecombinatio nofsynchronousand asynchronou scommunication,ac cessto-andfrom-g eographically isolatedcommunitiesa nd internationalinformationsharing. Clearlythereare benefitstobederive dfromsharingand learningwithin andoutwithHEIs. Thereisasenseofconnectedness,o fsharedpassion andadeepen ingofknowledg etobe derivedfromongo inginteraction.Kno wledgedevelo pmentcanbecontin uous,cyclicaland fluid.However,barr iersexistinvirtualCoPs andthesearede finedbytheauthors and illustratedwithquotesfromacademicstaffwh ohavebeeninv olvedinCoPs. Criticalsuccessfactors (CSFs)foravirtualCo Parediscussed.These includeusabilityo f technology;trustin ,andacceptance of,ICTsincommunica tion;asenseofbelo ngingamong members;paying attentiontocross-natio nalandcross-cul turaldimensionsofthe CoP; sharedunderstandings;acommonsenseofpurpose;useofnetiquette anduser-friendly languageandlongevity. TheauthorsrecognisetheenormouspotentialforthedevelopmentofCoPsthroughe-mail discussionlistsand discussionboa rdsbuthavethemse lvesexperience dthedifficulties inherentininitiating suchacommunity.The searecorrobo ratedandillustrate dwithtextfrom interviewswithaca demicstaff.Muchofthelite ratureonCoPsema natesfromoutside Europe,despiteth efactthate-learninga rticleshavealarge diffusionaround Europe.The authorssuggestfurtherexploration ofthistopicbyidentifyingan dstudyingCoPs andvirtual learningcommunitiesacrossEUcountries. Keywords Communitiesofprac tice;collaborative;e nvironments;informallearning;interactivi ty; usability;e-learning  
Transcript

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 1/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 1 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Communities of Practice and virtual learning communities:

benefits, barriers and success factorsPat Gannon-Leary, Northumbria University, United Kingdom

Elsa Fontainha, ISEG – Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal 

Summary AvirtualCommunityofPractice(CoP)isanetworkofindividualswhoshareadomainofinterestaboutwhichtheycommunicateonline.Thepractitionersshareresources(forexampleexperiences,problemsandsolutions,tools,methodologies).Suchcommunicationresultsintheimprovementoftheknowledgeofeachparticipantinthecommunityandcontributestothedevelopmentoftheknowledgewithinthedomain.Avirtuallearningcommunitymayinvolvetheconductoforiginalresearchbutitismorelikelythatitsmain

purposeistoincreasetheknowledgeofparticipants,viaformaleducationorprofessionaldevelopment.Virtuallearningcommunitiescouldhavelearningastheirmaingoalorthee-learningcouldbegeneratedasasideeffect. Virtualcommunitiesofpractice(CoPs)andvirtuallearningcommunitiesarebecomingwidespreadwithinhighereducationinstitutions(HEIs)thankstotechnologicaldevelopmentswhichenableincreasedcommunication,interactivityamongparticipantsandincorporationofcollaborativepedagogicalmodels,specificallythroughinformationcommunicationstechnologies(ICTs)Theyaffordthepotentialforthecombinationofsynchronousandasynchronouscommunication,accessto-andfrom-geographicallyisolatedcommunitiesandinternationalinformationsharing.

ClearlytherearebenefitstobederivedfromsharingandlearningwithinandoutwithHEIs.Thereisasenseofconnectedness,ofsharedpassionandadeepeningofknowledgetobederivedfromongoinginteraction.Knowledgedevelopmentcanbecontinuous,cyclicalandfluid.However,barriersexistinvirtualCoPsandthesearedefinedbytheauthorsandillustratedwithquotesfromacademicstaffwhohavebeeninvolvedinCoPs.Criticalsuccessfactors(CSFs)foravirtualCoParediscussed.Theseincludeusabilityoftechnology;trustin,andacceptanceof,ICTsincommunication;asenseofbelongingamongmembers;payingattentiontocross-nationalandcross-culturaldimensionsoftheCoP;sharedunderstandings;acommonsenseofpurpose;useofnetiquetteanduser-friendlylanguageandlongevity.

TheauthorsrecognisetheenormouspotentialforthedevelopmentofCoPsthroughe-maildiscussionlistsanddiscussionboardsbuthavethemselvesexperiencedthedifficultiesinherentininitiatingsuchacommunity.Thesearecorroboratedandillustratedwithtextfrominterviewswithacademicstaff.MuchoftheliteratureonCoPsemanatesfromoutsideEurope,despitethefactthate-learningarticleshavealargediffusionaroundEurope.TheauthorssuggestfurtherexplorationofthistopicbyidentifyingandstudyingCoPsandvirtuallearningcommunitiesacrossEUcountries.Keywords

Communitiesofpractice;collaborative;environments;informallearning;interactivity;usability;e-learning 

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 2/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 2 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Introduction

 AVirtualCommunityofPractice(CoP)isanetworkofindividualswhoshareadomainofinterestaboutwhichtheycommunicateonline.Thepractitionersshareresources(forexampleexperiences,problemsandsolutions,tools,methodologies).Suchcommunicationresultsintheimprovementoftheknowledgeofeachparticipantinthecommunityandcontributestothedevelopmentoftheknowledgewithinthedomain.VirtualCoPsmaysharenewsandadviceofacademic/professionalinterestbutareunlikelytoundertakejointprojectstogether–thisismoretheroleofaDistributedResearchCentre(Bosetal,2007).Avirtuallearningcommunity,ontheotherhand,mayinvolvetheconductoforiginalresearchbutitismorelikelythatitsmainpurposeistoincreasetheknowledgeofparticipants,viaformaleducationorprofessionaldevelopment.Virtuallearningcommunitiescouldhavelearningastheirmaingoalorthee-learningcouldbegeneratedasasideeffect.InformallearningratherthanmoreformallearningoccurswithinavirtualCoPand,accordingtoLave&Wengerthisinvolves“theprocessofbecomingafullparticipantinasocioculturalpractice”(Lave&Wenger,1991:29)wherebymoreexperiencedparticipantspassontoneophytestheknowledgeandskillstheyhaveacquiredand,inconsequence,thesharedexpertiseoftheparticipantsisenhanced.Owingtotechnologicaldevelopments,academicstaffandstudentsinhighereducationinstitutions(HEIs)nowhavetheopportunitytooperateinimprovedlearningenvironmentsthroughincreasedcommunication,interactivityamongparticipants,andincorporationofcollaborativepedagogicalmodels,specificallythroughinformationcommunicationstechnologies(ICTs)(Schrum,1998;Robey,Khoo,&Powers,2000;Rogers,2000;Stacey,Smith&Barty,2004).UsingICTsinlearningenvironmentsaffordthepotentialforthecombinationofsynchronousandasynchronouscommunication,accessto-andfrom-geographicallyisolatedcommunities(Hlapinis&Dimitracopoulou,2007)andinternationalinformationsharing.

Benefits of sharing and learningEngaginginavirtualCoPenhancesthelearningenvironmentsince,accordingtoJohnson(2001),“thelearningthatevolvedfromthesecommunitiesiscollaborative,inwhichthecollaborativeknowledgeofthecommunityisgreaterthananyindividualknowledge”(Johnson2001:34).Thisissimilartotheconceptofsynergyinwhichtwoormorediscreteagentsactingtogethercreateaneffectgreaterthanthatwhichwouldbeexpectedfromtheseparateactivitiesoftheindividualagents.ItalsoechoesVygotsky’s(1978)argumentthataperson’slearningmaybeenhancedthroughengagementwithotherswhichenablestheextensionofthatperson’scapabilitytoanew,higherlevel.Oneexampleofthisistheuse,bytworesearchers(Winkworth&Gannon-Leary,1999),ofa

virtualCoPintheformofadiscussionlist,tosupplementresearchtheyhadconductedforaconferencepaper.Thetopicwasgovernmentinterestinlibraryperformancemeasuresandtheywishedtogainaninternationalperspective.Knowingthatmembershipofarelateddiscussionlist(lis-perf-measures)comprisedsome400informationprofessionalsfrommorethan30countries,theypostedarequesttothelistforadditionaldata.Usingthismethodtheywereabletogainup-to-dateinformationfromfellowprofessionalsaboutthesituationintheircountries.Thedatawaspresentedattheconferenceanddisseminatedviatheproceedingstothewiderprofessionalandacademiccommunity.Muchemphasisisgiven,whenvirtualCoPsarediscussed,totheconceptofsharing,e.g.Wenger,McDermottandSnyder(2002)discusshowcommongroundisfoundbyCoPmembersasthey“feelconnected…andhaveinvaluableinsightstheycanlearnfromeach

other”(Wengeretal,2002:71).Thesameauthors,discussingthedevelopmentofCoPsintheworkplace,seethemas“groupsofpeoplewhoshareaconcern,setofproblemsor

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 3/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 3 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

passionaboutatopicandwhodeepentheirknowledgeandexpertiseinthisareabyinteractingonanongoingbasis”(Wengeretal,2002:4).KnowledgedevelopmentinaCoP,therefore,iscontinuous,cyclicalandfluidwithnoclearlydefinedbeginningorend. AsWhiteandPagano(2007)comment,theconceptofaCoPhasbeengivencurrencyinHEdiscoursebypractitionersinemergentareasofnetworkedlearning.LaveandWenger’swork

didnotproduceanewpedagogicalapproachbutprovidedananalyticalviewoflearning,questioningtheplaceofformaleducation.Thisshiftedtheemphasisfromtheabstractbodiesofknowledgetaughtinformaleducationtowardsthe‘situatedlearning’thatoccursaspeopleengagewithreal-worldproblemsinwayswhichmayalreadybemediatedforthembyexistingCoPs(Brown,Collins&Duguid1989;McLellan1995;Fox2005).AsFox(2005)says,networkedlearninghas,“asnoeducationalprocesshashadbefore,thecapabilitytofacilitateandenablenewformsofimaginedcommunity”(Fox2005:108).LaveandWenger(1991)discusslearningasparticipationinasocialworlddescribinghowpeoplelearnbetterinsocialsettingsandthroughsocialinteraction.VirtualCoPsencompassthisconceptinthattheyestablishanetworkedenvironmentwherethenecessaryinteractionsthatimprovelearningcanoccur(Wengeretal.,2002).Theinteractionswithinthesecommunitiesfocusaroundknowledgesharingwithinthemembership,whomayrangefromexpertsthroughtonovices.Viatheinteractionoftheexpertandnovice,aneo-apprenticeshipstylelearning,similartothatproposedbyVygotsky,canoccur.LearnersparticipatinginavirtualCoPareassimilatedintothesocioculturalpracticesofthecommunityandgainknowledge/skillsfromthosecommunitymemberspositionedasmasters(Lave&Wenger1991).Thisviewreiteratesthemodelofapprenticeshiporlearninginsocialandsituatedcontexts,especiallyintheworkplace(Fowler&Mayes,1999;Fox,2000;Warhurst,2003).BrownandDuguid(2002)suggestsituatedlearningis“knowinghowtobeinpractice”,ratherthan“knowingaboutpractice”(Brown&Duguid2002:138),andthusinvolvesaprocessofidentitydevelopmentforthenewcomerthroughparticipationinthepracticeofthecommunity.BecomingamemberofavirtualCoPanddevelopingknowledgeandskillsis,therefore,importantinidentityformationofthenewcomer.Thisisaboutthememberdescribingtheirownengagement…intermsofwhatthey’rehopingtolearnoutofit…theymodeltheirowncapabilities,sothattheycreatethemselvesassomebodywhohasmorevalueinrelationtothecontextthatthey’reworkingin…(UKacademic)[1]ThisfactorhasbeensubjecttosomecriticismwithregardtoCoPssinceitmayresultintheperpetuationofcommunitiesandcommonalityratherthansupportiveofgrowth,changeanddiversity(Eraut,2003).

Barriers to virtual CoPs and virtual learning communities

ThefirstpotentialbarriertothevirtualCoPmaybethedisciplineinvolved.Insomeareas,suchasthesciences,cuttingedgeknowledgemaybedifficulttodisseminatetolargegroupssinceitmayrequirespecialisedexpertiseandmaybedifficulttoaggregateorrepresent(Szulanski,1992;Olson&Olson,2000;Bosetal,2007).Secondly,inmanydisciplines,academicsenjoyagreatdegreeoffreedomandexistinacultureofindependencerenderingopencommunicationmoredifficult.Withcolleaguesandpeopleknownpersonallytoyou,thereisasharingoftacitknowledgeandtransactiveknowledge(i.e.youknowwhatyourpeersknow)(Hollingshead,1998;Ozdemir,2007).Eachprofessionhasitsownterminology…wehaveaverydiverselanguage (UKacademic)

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 4/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 4 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

 Afewhavesaidhowmuchofastruggletheyhavehadwiththelanguage.Theyhavenotallbeenfromoverseas–afewhavebeenintheUK–itisallcognitiveandcultural,alllinked.(UKacademic)Thethirdbarrier,therefore,iscollegialitysincemotivationtojoinavirtualCoPmaybeweakwherethereisacontextofhighcollegiality,e.g.astrongcommunityofpeoplewhoare

physicallyco-located(Smithetal,2005)It’smoredifficulttocreatetheflowofinformation.Wetryreallyhardtogetmemberstocommunicatewithintheirowngroup…butit’squitedifficultwithouttheface-to-facethingtobreaktheice(UKacademic)Lackofpeersupportandlackofcontactwithothers…Thelackofcontactwasquitefrustrating.(UKacademic) AnotherbarrierinvolvestheshiftingmembershipofavirtualCoPwhichasWengeretal.(2002)pointoutisfluidinitscomposition.Inconsequence,virtualCoPsneedtoworkhardtomaintainenergyandahighdegreeofparticipation.Individualmembersofavirtualcommunitymustengagewithitinorderthatitmaydevelopandgrowandhavemeaning(McMillan,1996;Gibson&Manuel,2003;Ellisetal2004).StuckeyandSmith(2004)arguethatthereareidentifiablefeaturestoasuccessfulCoP,andmostimportantlytheabilitytosustainthecommunity,thechiefofwhichistheneedfor‘leadership’which,inthecaseofaCoP,maybeamoderator,facilitatororlistowner.Whenyou’redeliveringitelectronically,alotofmembersjustdon’t‘getit’,butyoucan’tspotthat…(UKacademic)Somemembersdon’tsayawordon-line.They’lljustsitthere.There’salotof‘lurking’goeson…(UKacademic)[2] Afifthbarrierinvolvestrust.ThevirtualCoPlackstheopportunityforface-tofaceinteractionandsocialisingwhichcanconsolidategroupmembership.ConsequentlyindividualsmayfailtoengageintheCoP,preferringtoworkautonomously.Trustbuildingisvitalforsharing(Jarvenpaa&Leidner,1999;Kirkup,2002;Gibson&Manuel,2003;Ellisetal2004)andtrustprimarilydevelopsthroughface-to-faceinteractions.Inthevirtualenvironment,identitiescanremainhiddenandmembersmayadoptdifferentpersonas(Tomes,2001;Turkle,1997).You’retryingtoreplaceareallearningenvironmentwithavirtualone…it’savery‘touchy- feely’thing.There’sawholeraftofthingsthatthevirtualenvironmentwon’tletyoudo… (UKacademic) Asixthbarrieralsoinvolvestrustbutataninstitutionallevel.Crossingvirtualboundariesbetweeninstitutionscanresultininstitutional-relatedproblems,especiallylegalissues,e.g.dataprotection,intellectualproperty(Stokolsetal.,2003,2005;Cummings&Kiesler,2005;Boset.al.2007).Iworryaboutintellectualpropertyrights:Wegivetoomuchaway…nobodyelsegivesasmuchdetailelectronically…(UKacademic) AfurtherbarrierinvolvesselectivityintheuseofICTs.Manyacademics,professionalsandstudentsarestrategicusersofICTs(Schwen&Hara,2003;Smithetal,2005;Kellyetal,2007),matchingtheirusagetoperceptionsofmeetingtheiroperationalneeds,irrespectiveofthedegreeoftheirICTskills.Thisisrelevanttoanotherbarrier,revolvingaroundwhetherthe

CoPistask-basedorpracticebased.Avirtuallearningcommunitymaybeshort-livedhaveafinitebeginningandend,beingtask-based,establishedforaspecificlearningactivitysuchas

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 5/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 5 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

acourseorseminar.Ontheotherhand,apractice-basedorsubject-basedvirtualCoPmaydevelopmoreorganicallyandbelesstransient(Fowler&Mayes,1999) Afinalissueinvolvestheuseoftechnologytobridgethegeographicalgapwhichcanleadtomisinterpretationofmessages,asalotofnon-verbalcuescanbemissingfromthecommunication(Gibson&Manuel,2003;Cramton,2001;Gannon-Leary,1999).ICTslack

therichnessofface-to-faceinteraction.Muchanecdotalinformationfeaturesmisinterpretedcommunicationonline,easilyexaggeratedintheabsenceofcuesandfeedback.(Trayner,Smith&Bettoni,2006)OrganisationssuchastheUKNationalHealthServiceareincreasinglyusingnetworkedlearning,e-learningplatformsandblendedlearningbut:Workingwithotherpractitioners,Iknowthattheircomputerskillsarenotnecessarily100%.…(UKacademic)Theylackfamiliaritywithsystems…Itmeansanewlearningcurve,butwearenowinasocietyandaculturalandtechnologicalenvironmentofconstantchange,sowejustneedtobeabletoengagewithchangeinawaythatdoesn’tfeellikeaconstantstepbackwards (UKacademic)

Critical success factors for virtual CoPs and virtual learning communitiesOnecriticalsuccessfactor(CSF)foravirtualCoPisthetechnologyanditsusability.VirtualCoPsneedtomakegooduseofInternetstandardtechnologiessuchaslistserv,bulletinboards,andaccessiblewebtechnology.Moule’s(2006)findingssuggestthatavirtuallearningcommunitywillneedtoensureparticipantshavethetechnologicalprovisionandnecessaryITskillstosupportmutualengagement(Wenger1998).DifficultieswithaccessandICTskillsinrelationtoonlinediscussionsande-basedlearningareacknowledgedintheexistinginternationalliterature(Milstead&Nelson1998,Andrusyszynetal.1999,Geibert2000,Gillisetal.2000,Hongetal.2003).Technologyneedstoberegardedasanaccepted–andtransparent–meansofcommunication(Campbell&Uys2007).TheevolutionofaCoPisreliantupontheeffectivecommunicationofthemembers,mosteasilyachievedthroughface-to-facemeetings(Hinds&Wesiband,2003;Raven,2003;Wengeretal.2002).PersonalinteractionsarevaluableinbuildingCoPsandBroady-PrestonandFelice(2006)demonstratethecreationofanelectronicrelationshipbetweenlibraryusersandinformationprovidersintheUniversityofMalta,adoptingacustomerrelationshipmanagementandcommunitiesofpracticeapproach.Thisprogressedfromaphysicaltoanelectronicrelationshipanddemonstratedtheabilityof

theinternettofunctionasamediumformanagingrelationshipsaswellasafacilitatorforinteractionandcommunication(Broady-Prestonetal2006)Communication,therefore,isanotherCSFandisfundamentalinthedevelopmentoftrustandthecommunity.Alongwithtrust,communicationallowstheCoPtogrow,changeandachieveitsobjectives.Trustisbuiltthroughcontinuedinteractiondevelopingcommonvaluesandasharedunderstanding(Gibson&Manuel,2003;Amin&Roberts,2006). AthirdCSFinvolvesCoPmembership.AndrewsandSchwarz(2002)havereportedthebenefitsofidentifyinggroupmemberswithpriorknowledgeofeachothertohelpconsolidatemembershipanddeveloptrust

Fourthly,CoPmembersmusthaveasenseofbelonging,beinganinsider(Brown&Duguid2002;Wegerif1998),Trayner,SmithandBettoni(2006)addthatpayingattentiontocross-nationalandcross-culturaldimensionsininternationalonlinecommunitiesaddstothe

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 6/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 6 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

complexity,challengesandvalueinsuchanaccomplishment.ThisisillustratedbytheHSBCadvertisementsontelevisionthatidentifydifferentgestureswhichconveydifferentmeaningsindifferentcultureswhenoneis‘doingbusiness’inaglobalcontext.FromthisfollowsonafifthCSF,thatthereshouldbesharedunderstanding.ConsiderationneedstobegiventotheinfluenceofcultureintheuseofICTsinthedevelopmentofacommunity(Campbell&Uys2007).Cultureimpactsontheabilityofthememberstodevelopasharedunderstandingand

sub-groupsofthecommunity,basedontheseculturescaneasilyemerge.Sharedrepertoire mayincludedevelopedroutines,language,waysofworkingandstorieswithinthepracticeofthecommunity,generatedthroughnegotiatingmeaning(Wenger1998).Itispostulatedthatvirtuallearningcommunitieswithabriefexistencemaynothavethelongevityofengagementrequiredtodevelopsharedrepertoire(Fowler&Mayes1999).IdentifyingelementsofsharedrepertoireprovedproblematicinMoule’s(2006)analysisoftheonlineenvironment,whichlackedtherichnessthatmightbeobservedinaphysicallylocatedCoP,wherepresentationsofgestures,nuances,routinesandstoriesaremademanifest. AnotherCSFinvolveshavingasenseofpurpose.AvirtualCoPmusthaveapurposeandthispurposemustbeachievableviaICTs(Dubeetal,2005;Campbell&Uys2007).ACSFwhichhelpsachievethissenseofpurposeinvolvesleadershipwhichStuckeyandSmith(2004)haveexemplifiedassustainingaCoPthroughsensitivityinmonitoring,regulating,maintainingboundariesandrespondingtochange.Asthecommunitybecomesmoredistributedtheneedfordrivingleadershipbecomesmoreimportant,(Chavisetal1986;Gibson&Manuel,2003).AttendantonthisistheCSFofnetiquetteandthemodellingofgoodpracticeandthewayguidelinesaboutconductinavirtualCoPareputintopracticebyfacilitators(Trayner,Smith&Bettoni2006;Gannon-Leary1999).Thisisespeciallyimportantinthecaseof‘neo-apprentices’invirtualCoPswhomaybewaryaboutcontributingbecausetheyfeelwhattheyhavetosayisnotsufficientlyworthyorweighty.Seeingotherpeople‘flamed’orsendabusiveemailsonvirtualCoPsislikelytoinhibitcontributionsfromputativemembers. AnotherCSFinvolvestheCoPsusageofuser-friendlylanguageandwhatTrayner,SmithandBettoni(2006)describeasthe‘ecology’ofcommunicationmodesandskills,orgracefulwaysofbringingpeopleintoconversations. AfinalCSFrevolvesaroundtime.LongevityofaCoPimprovesengagement,asmentionedinconnectionwithtask-basedvs.practicebasedCoPs.Timeisneededbothforcommunicationandtobuilduptrust,rapportandatruesenseofcommunity(Trayner,Smith&Bettoni,2006.Table1:Benefits,BarriersandCSFs Benefits Barriers CSFs

•  Enhancedlearningenvironment

•  Synergiescreated

•  Capabilitiesextendedtohigherlevel

•  Knowledgesharing&learning

•  Gaininginsightsfromeachother

•  Deepeningofknowledge,innovation&expertise

•  Cyclical,fluidknowledgedevelopment

•  Feelingofconnection

•  Ongoinginteractions•   Assimilationinto

•  Perpetuationvs.changeanddiversity

•  Disciplinarydifferences

•  Cultureofindependence

•  Tacitknowledge

•  Transactiveknowledge

•  Specialistlanguage

•  Collegiality,strongphysicalcommunity

•  Shiftingmembership,

•  Creatingandmaintaininginformationflow

•  NoF2Ftobreaktheice

•  Read-onlyparticipants

(formerlylurkers)•  Hiddenidentities,

•  GooduseofInternetstandardtechnologies

•  Technologicalprovision

•  ICTskills

•  InstitutionalacceptanceofICTsascommunicationmedia

•  Goodcommunications

•  Trust

•  Commonvalues

•  Sharedunderstanding

•  Priorknowledgeofmembership

•  Senseofbelonging

•  Culturalawareness•  Senseofpurpose

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 7/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 7 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

socioculturalpractices

•  Neo-apprenticeshipstyleoflearning

•  Identitydevelopmentandformation

•  Practice-basedusage

adoptedpersonas

•  Lackoftrust–personalandinstitutional

•  SelectivityinICTuse

•  Nobodylanguage,misinterpretations

•  Task-basedusage

•  Sensitivityinmonitoring,regulating,facilitating

•  Netiquette

•  User-friendlylanguage

•  TimetobuilduptheCoP

•  Regularinteraction

•  Goodcoordinationtoachieveregularbutvariedcommunication

•  Materialresourcesorsponsorshiptobolsterandbuildupthecommunity

Final commentsThepotentialimportofvirtualCoPsisrecognisedbyincreasinginterestinEuropeinnetworkedlearningande-learning,aswitnessedbythedevelopmentoforganisations

engagedinstudyingandproducingdataonthetopic,e.g.Eurostat,Eurydice,IEA,Eurobarometer,ECprojects.Amongthelast-mentionedare“eLearning:Designingtomorrow’sEducation”(CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities,2003)and“  i2010:EuropeanInformationSocietyforgrowthandemployment”whichwaslaunchedinJune2005asaframeworkforaddressingthemainchallengesanddevelopmentsintheinformationsocietyandmediasectorsupto2010(CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities,2006). AnotherexampleistheLEONIEprojectthatspecificallyindicatesthatoneexpectedoutcometoevolvebetweennowand2010isthecreationoflearningcommunities.(Alfaroetal,2006)ThegoalsoftheHELIOSProject(HorizontalE-LearningIntegratedObservationSystem)includethe“buildingofasystematicobservationandforesightingplatformone-LearningatEUandnationallevels”(HELIOS2007:1).Itstressesthatvirtualcommunities,eveniftheydonotforeseelearningastheirmainobjective,couldgeneratee-learningasasideeffect.

(DelRio&Fischer2007)TherecentlypublishedEuropeanCommissionGreenPaper(2007)iscurrentlyinvitingviewsonitsproposalsforaEuropeanResearchArea(ERA).ThepapersuggeststhattheERA“progressivelystructureitselfalongthelinesofapowerfulwebofresearchandinnovationclusters.Theirreachshouldbeamplifiedthrough‘virtualresearchcommunities’createdbypoolingandintegratingactivitiesandresourcesfromdifferentlocationsinEuropeandbeyond…”(EuropeanCommission2007:9).Italsosuggeststhatvirtualresearchcommunitiescan“constituteapowerfulvehicletoensuretheinclusionofresearchersandstudentsfromallaroundEuropeandothercountries.”(EuropeanCommission2007:18).Oneofthequestionsitposesinitsconcludingremarksisoneofinteresttotheauthors:“HowcantheEUandMemberStatesbeststimulatetheemergenceofEuropeanandglobalvirtualresearch

communities,exploitingfullythepotentialofcomputing,informationandcommunicationinfrastructures?”(EuropeanCommission2007:19).TheInternetoffersthepotentialforaccessandinteractionwithauniversallyaccessible,democraticandinteractivehubofspeedy,low-costcommunicationsandresourcesconnectingindividuals,disciplines,departmentsandservices.Weseeourselvesasaworldplayerinthedevelopmentofthee-learningcommunity.ThereisalotofpotentialfordevelopmentofcommunitythroughtheInternet.(UKacademic)Wearestillalongwayofffromprovidingasatisfactoryexperience(  UKacademic)

TheexistenceofvirtualCoPssuchasdiscussionlistsaffordopportunitiesforcollaborationwhichhavebeenfacilitatedbynetworkedtechnologysuchase-mail,whichmanyacademics

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 8/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 8 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

useregularly(Ciolek,2000).DiscussionlistsmayserveasvirtualCoPssincetheyprovideforinterestedprofessionals/academicstoengageindiscussionanddebate;giveothersthebenefitoftheirexperience,andoftensavethemselvesreinventingthewheelbyfindingoutwhatothershavedonewhenfacedwithparticularproblems(Gannon-Leary,1998).Inacademiathereareavarietyofthesespecialinterestgroupsexchangingmessagesonarangeoftopics.

Intheory,theCoPsshouldaddanewdimensiontoacademicresearchanditscommunication.Mootedbenefitsofnetworkingandcommunicationincluderenderingphysicallocationunimportantandisolationfromthepeergrouplessproblematicwhenacademicsarescatteredgeographicallyorworkinsmallinstitutions,sincevirtualCoPscangrowupbasedoninterestsratherthanonphysicalproximityenablingcollaborations,sharingofspecialistinterestsandaffordingaccesstomentorsandlike-mindedindividuals(SchmitzandFulk,1991). Amongagroupofpeoplewithacommoninterestinatopic,thereisnonaturalhierarchyexcepttheonewhichevolvesfromparticipationand‘natural’expertscanemerge(Andersonetal,1995).Enhancedaccessisaffordedtoinformation,academicsmaystrengthentheircommandoftheirfieldofworkandthatworkismadeincreasinglyvisibletoothers(Ciolek,2000).CoPmembersshareinformation,insightandadviceand,insodoing,derivevaluefromtheirinteraction.Overtimeitispossibletodevelopauniqueperspectiveonatopicinadditiontoabodyofcommonknowledge,practicesandapproaches.WhiletheconceptofCoPsisnotnew,thedevelopmentoftheICTs,combinedwiththeneedformoreintentional,systematicmanagementofknowledgemeansthatelectroniccommunicationsmayaffordanopportunitynotonlytomanageknowledgeasanassetbutalsotokeepapaceofchangeandcoreknowledgerequirements. AlthoughthepotentialforvirtualCoPsthroughe-maildiscussionlistsanddiscussionboardswouldseemenormous,theauthors’recentexperienceinsettingupandmoderatingsuchalist,coupledwiththecommentsderivedfromacademicstryingtosustaindiscussionboards,suggeststhispotentialisnotbeingrealised.Theauthors’experiencewasthattheannouncementoftheintroductionofanewlist,alongwithitsaimsandscope,resultedinmanywould-bemembersfromallovertheworldsigningupand,bysodoing,indicatinganinterestinthelistthemebutfewofthesigneessubsequentlymadeanactivecontribution.Listmembersincludedinternationalexpertsinthelisttopic,withmuchvaluableexperiencewhichtheycouldsharewithotherssothislackofexchangeofinteractionwasamatterofconcern.ManyofthearticlescitedinthispaperarefromareasotherthanEurope–fromtheUSA(Geibert,2000;Gibson&Manuel,2003;Hinds&Wesiband,2003;Jarvenpaa&Leidner,1999;Milstead&Nelson,1998;Robeyetal,2000;Schrum,1998),Canada(Andrusyszynetal,1999;Gillisetal,2000)andAustralia(Andrews&Schwarz,2002;Campbell&Uys,2007;Smithetal,2005;Staceyetal,2004).Fox(2005)commentsonthefacttheInternetisdominatedbyAmerican-Englishandstressestheneedfornetworkedlearning“toengagewiththeissueoflanguagesandthroughthattheissueofotherculturesandcommunities.”(Fox2005:108)RecentlyPetersen(2007)fromDenmarksuggeststhatconceptsoflearningincommunitiesofpracticemightbefurtherdevelopedandWubbels(2007)fromtheNetherlandsdiscussedtheneedforfurtherresearchinthisarea.Theauthorswouldconcurwiththis,giventhatnetworkedlearningande-learningarticleshavealargediffusionaroundEurope,andwouldliketofurtheridentifyandstudyCoPsandvirtuallearningcommunitiesacrossEUcountries.Whatarethebenefits,barriersandsuccessstoriesinEurope?Havewebeenslowertotake

advantageofthepotentialofICTs?DoEuropeansdisplayspecialcharacteristicswhichdifferentiatetheiruseofelectronicmedia,specificallyCoPs,fromthatmadebytheircounterpartsinNorthAmericaandAustralia?Doesthediversityofculturesandlanguages

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 9/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 9 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

militateagainstEuropeanacademicsengaginginCoPstothesameextent?ItwouldappearfromtheliteraturethatthereiscurrentlyalackofknowledgeaboutCoPsinEurope,especiallythoseassociatedwithposttertiaryandUniversityeducation.Oneacademicrecognisedpotentialbenefitsbeyondthosetohimself:Ifyou’reinvolvedindistancelearningyoucaneasilybecomeinvolvedinon-linecommunities

thatrevolvearoundyoursubject.There’salotofbenefitthatcouldbegainedbytheHEIfromthatsortofinvolvementbothintermsofstudentrecruitmentandintermsofworldrenown.(UKacademic) AnotheracademicexpandedonherownUtopianvisionofaCoPasanupdatedversionoftheeighteenthcenturyEuropean‘salon’whichprovidedabaseforthediscussionofsocial,artisticandscientificquestions:Scholarlyexchange,thebuildingupofresearchcommunities...peoplereallybecomingpartofaresearchnetworkinaveryactiveway,eventhoughthey'rethousandsandthousandsofmilesapart…thedemocratisingpotentialofthat...recreatestheconditions,almost,ofamassintellectualsalonwherepeopleareabletoargueanddiscuss,andbeincontact(UKacademic)

Remarks[1]Thequotationsarefromtheauthors’recentresearchwithacademicsintheUKwhich,todate,hasnotbeenpublishedelsewhere.Theauthorswouldliketothankcontributors[2]CurrentlythepreferredtermforonlinebehaviourwherebytheparticipantreadsthepostingsoftheparticipantsinavirtualCoPbutdoesnotactivelycontributetothedebateis‘ROP’or‘readonlyparticipant’.

References

 Alfaro,J.etal(2006)UnderstandingChange,AdaptingtoChange,ShapingtheFuture,ChangeDrivers,Trends&CoreTensionsforEuropeanLearningSystems&EducationalPolicies,LearninginEurope;ObservatoryonNationalandInternationalEvolution,LEONIEProject,retrievedJune14fromhttp://www.education-observatories.net/leonie/outputs/LEONIE_Executive_Summary_2006.pdf  Amin,A.&Roberts,J.(2006)CommunitiesofPractice?VarietiesofSituatedLearning.Draftpaperpreparedfor:EUNetworkofExcellenceDynamicsofInstitutionsandMarketsinEurope(DIME)retrievedAug21,2007fromhttp://cops.dime-eu.org/files/active/0/Amin_Roberts.pdf  Anderson,R.H.etal.:(1995),UniversalAccesstoE-mail-FeasibilityandSocietal

Implications,RANDReportMR-650-MF,retrievedJune6,2007fromfromhttp://www.rand.org:80/publications/MR/MR650/  AndrewsT.&SchwarzG.(2002)Preparingstudentsforthevirtualorganisation:anevaluationoflearningwithvirtuallearningtechnologies.EducationalTechnologyandSociety5(3),54–65. AndrusyszynM.,IwasiwC.&GoldenbergD.(1999)Computerconferencingingraduatenursingeducation:perceptionsofstudentsandfaculty.JournalofContinuingEducationinNursing30(6),272– 278.Bos,N.,Zimmerman,A.,Olson,J.,Yew,J.,Yerkie,J.,Dahl,E.,etal.(2007).Fromshareddatabasestocommunitiesofpractice:Ataxonomyofcollaboratories.JournalofComputer-MediatedCommunication ,12 (2),article16.retrievedJune6,2007from

http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue2/bos.html

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 10/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 10 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Broady-Preston,J.,Felice,J.&Marshall,S.(2006)Buildingbettercustomerrelationships:casestudiesfromMaltaandtheUK.Librarymanagement,27(6/7),430-445Broady-Preston,J&Felice,J.(2006)Customers,relationshipsandlibraries:UniversityofMalta–acasestudy.ASLIBproceedings,58(6),525-536.

Brown,J.S.&Duguid,P.(2002)Thesociallifeofinformation.Boston:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.Brown,J.S.,Collins,A.&Duguid,S.(1989).Situatedcognitionandthecultureoflearning.EducationalResearcher,18(1),32-42Campbell,M.&Uys,P.(2007)IdentifyingsuccessfactorsofICTindevelopingalearningcommunity:CasestudyCharlesSturtUniversityCampus-WideInformationSystems,24(1)17-26.Chavis,D.M.,Hogge,J.,McMillan,D.&Wandersman,A.(1986),SenseofcommunitythroughBrunswick’slens:afirstlook,JournalofCommunityPsychology,14,24-40.Ciolek,T.M.ed.(2000)“TheInternetin2000:OpportunitiesandDisadvantagestoScholarlyWork(resultsofanonlinebrainstormingsession)”HistoryEducation

Forum(HEF)7Decp.1-16,DeptofHistory,HongKongBaptistUniversity,HongKong,retrievedJune6,2007fromwww.ciolek.com/PAPERS/brainstorm-mar00.htmlCommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities(2003) e Learning:Designingtomorrow’seducation.Mid-termreportSEC(2003)905retrievedJune14,2007fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/education/programmes/elearning/doc/mid_term_report_en.pdfCommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities(2006)i2010-FirstannualreportontheEuropeaninformationsociety{COM(2006)215}retrievedJune14,2007fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/information_society/eeurope/i2010/docs/annual_report/2006/sec_2006_604_en.pdfCramton,C.(2001).Themutualknowledgeproblemanditsconsequencesfordispersedcollaboration.OrganizationScience,12,346–371.Cummings,J.,&Kiesler,S.(2005).Collaborativeresearchacrossdisciplinaryandorganizationalboundaries.SocialStudiesofScience,retrievedJune6,2007fromhttp://www.cs.cmu.edu/~kiesler/publications/PDFs/CummingsKieslerWeb0305.pdf DelRio,C.&Fischer,T.(2007).HELIOS:Redefininge-LearningTerritories,eLearningPaper,no.4Dubé,L.,Bourhis,A.&Jacob,R.,(2005),Theimpactofstructuringcharacteristicsonthelaunchingofvirtualcommunitiesofpractice,JournalofOrganizationalChangeManagement,18(2),145-166. Ellis,D.,Oldridge,R.&Vasconcelos,A.(2004),Communityandvirtualcommunity,AnnualReviewofInformationScienceandTechnology,38,145–186

Eraut,M.(2003)Editorial.LearninginHealthandSocialCare.2(3),117-122.EuropeanCommission(2007)TheEuropeanResearchArea:NewPerspectives-GreenPaper.Luxembourg:OfficeforOfficialPublicationsoftheEuropeanCommunities,retrievedAugust7,2007fromhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/era/pdf/era-greenpaper_en.pdf  Fowler,C.&Mayes,J.(1999)Learningrelationshipsfromtheorytodesign.AssociationforLearningTechnologyJournal.7(3),6-16Fox,S.(2000)CommunitiesofPractice,FoucaultandActor-NetworkTheory.JournalofManagementStudies.37(6),853-867

Fox,S.(2000)Anactor-networkcritiqueofcommunityinhighereducation:implicationsfornetworkedlearning.StudiesinHigherEducation,30(1)95-110

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 11/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 11 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Gannon-Leary,P.(1998)Theethicsofelectronicmail.IRISSInternationalConference,BristolUK,retrievedAug6,2007fromhttp://www.intute.ac.uk/socialsciences/archive/iriss/papers/paper11.htmGannon-Leary,P(1999).Theethicsofemail.InPourciau,L.J.(Ed.),EthicsandElectronicInformationinthe21stCentury.Indiana:PurdueU.P.,165-190

Geibert,R.(2000)IntegratingWeb-basedinstructionintoagraduatenursingprogramtaughtviavideoconferencing.Challengesandsolutions.ComputersinNursing18(1),26–34.Gibson,C.B.&Manuel,J.A.(2003),Buildingtrust:effectivemulticulturalcommunicationprocessesinvirtualteams,InGibson,C.B.&Cohen,S.G.(Eds.),VirtualTeamsthatWork.SanFrancisco,CA:Wiley&Sons,59-86.Gillis,A.Jackson,W.Braid,A.MacDonald,P.&MacQuarrie,M.(2000)Thelearningneedsandexperiencesofwomenusingprint-basedandCD-ROMtechnologyinnursingdistanceeducation.JournalofDistanceEducation.15(1),1-20HELIOS(2007)HELIOSreport2007ExecutiveSummary.retrievedAugust20,2007from

http://www.education-observatories.net/heliosHinds,P.J.&Wesiband,S.P.(2003),Knowledgesharingandsharedunderstandinginvirtualteams,InGibson,C.B.&Cohen,S.G.(Eds.),VirtualTeamsthatWork.SanFrancisco,CA:Wiley&Sons21-36Hlapanis,G.&Dimitracopoulou,A.(2007)Theschool-teacher’slearningcommunity:mattersofcommunicationanalysis.TechnologyPedagogyandEducation16(2)133-152Hollingshead,A.B.(1998).Retrievalprocessesintransactivememorysystems.JournalofPersonalityandSocialPsychology,74(3),659–671HongK.-S.,LaiK.-W.&HoltonD.(2003)Students’satisfactionandperceivedlearningwithinaweb-basedcourse.EducationalTechnologyandSociety6(1),116–124.Jarvenpaa,S.,&Leidner,D.(1999).Communicationandtrustinglobalvirtualteams.OrganizationScience,10,791–815.Johnson,C.M.(2001).Asurveyofcurrentresearchononlinecommunitiesofpractice.TheInternetandHigherEducation,4(1),45-60.Kelly,P.,Gale,K.,Wheeler,S.&Tucker,V.(2007)Takingastance:promotingdeliberateactionthroughonlinepostgraduateprofessionaldevelopment.TechnologyPedagogyandEducation16(2)153-176.KirkupG.(2002)Identity,communityanddistributedlearning.InLea,M.&Nicoll,K.(Eds.).DistributedLearning:Social,CulturalApproachestoPractice.London:Routledge/Falmer,182-195.

Kirschner,P.A.&Lai,K-W(2007)OnlinecommunitiesofpracticeineducationTechnologyPedagogyandEducation16(2)127-132.Lave,J.&Wenger,E.(1991)Situatedlearning:legitimateperipheralparticipation.Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.McLellan,H.(1995).SituatedLearningPerspectives.EnglewoodCliffs,NJ:EducationalTechnologyPublicationsMcMillan,D.(1996),Senseofcommunity,JournalofCommunityPsychology,.24,315-25.MilsteadJ.&NelsonR.(1998)Preparationforanonlineasynchronousuniversitydoctoralcourse:lessonslearned.ComputersinNursing16(5),247–258.

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 12/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 12 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Moule,P.(2006)DevelopingtheCommunitiesofPractice,FrameworkforOn-LineLearningElectronicJournalofE-learning,4(2)133-140.Olson,G.M.,&Olson,J.S.(2000).Distancematters.HumanComputerInteraction,15,139–179.Ozdemir,S.(2007)E-learning’seffectonknowledge:Canyoudownloadtacitknowledge?British

JournalofEducationalTechnology(OnlineEarlyArticles).doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00764.xretrievedAug21,2007fromhttp://www.blackwell-synergy.com/action/showPdf?submitPDF=Full+Text+PDF+%2846+KB%29&doi=10.1111%2Fj.1467-8535.2007.00764.xPetersen,K.B.(2007)e-LearninginVirtualCommunitiesofPractice–AndBeyond?ResearchFindingsBasedonInterviewswithStudentsandTeachersinSecondLanguagee-LearningSettingsinDenmark.Proceedingsofthe2

ndInterntionalConferenceone-Learning,NewYork,28-29June,np.

Raven,A.(2003),TeamorCommunityofPracticeAligningTasks,StructuresandTechnologiesInGibson,C.B.&Cohen,S.G.(Eds.),VirtualTeamsthatWork.SanFrancisco,CA:Wiley&Sons292-306.

Robey,D.,Khoo,H.M.&Powers,C.(2000).Situatedlearningincross-functionalvirtualteams.IEEEtransactiononprofessionalcommunication,43(1),51-66.Rogers,J.(2000)Communitiesofpractice:AframeworkforfosteringcoherenceinvirtuallearningcommunitiesEducationalTechnologyandSociety.3(3),1-12.Schmitz,J.&Fulk,J,(1991)Organizationalcolleagues,mediarichness,andelectronicmail:atestofthesocialinfluencemodeloftechnologyuseCommunication-Research.18Aug.487-523.Schrum,L.(1998).On-lineeducation:Astudyofemergingpedagogy.InCahoon,B.(Ed.),AdultLearningandtheInternet,SanFrancisco,CA:Jossey-BassPublishers,53–61.Schwen,T.&Hara,N.(2003).Communityofpractice:Ametaphorforonlinedesign?,TheInformationSociety,19,257-270.Seddon,K.&Postlethwaite,K.(2007)Creatingandtestingamodelfortutorsandparticipantstosupportthecollaborativeconstructionofknowledgeonline.TechnologyPedagogyandEducation16(2)177-198.Smith,P.,Barty,K.&Stacey,E.(2005)Limitationsofanestablishedcommunityofpracticeindevelopingonlineinnovation,Breakingdownboundaries:internationalexperienceinopen,distanceandflexibleeducation.Proceedingsofthe17thODLAAconference,pp.1-6,ODLAA,Adelaide.Stacey,E.,Smith,P.J.&Barty,K.(2004).Adultlearnersintheworkplace:Onlinelearningandcommunitiesofpractice,DistanceEducation,25(1),107-124.

Stokols,D.,Fuqua,J.,Gress,J.,Harvey,R.,Phillips,K.,Baezconde-Garbanati,L,etal.(2003).Evaluatingtransdisciplinaryscience.NicotineandTobaccoResearch,5(Suppl.1),S21–39.Stokols,D.,Harvey,R.,Gress,J.,Fuqua,J.,&Phillips,K.(2005).Invivostudiesoftransdisciplinaryscientificcollaboration:Lessonslearnedandimplicationsforactivelivingresearch.AmericanJournalofPreventiveMedicine,28(Suppl.2),202–213.Stuckey,B.&Smith,J.D.(2004),Buildingsustainablecommunitiesofpractice,inHildreth,P.&Kimble,C.(Eds.),KnowledgeNetworks:InnovationthroughCommunitiesofPractice,Hershey,PA:IdeaGroup.150-164.Szulanski,G.(1992).StickyKnowledge:BarrierstoKnowingintheFirm.London:SagePublications.

TomesN.(2001)Technology-supportedcollaborativelearning.InFalchicov,N.(Ed.)LearningTogether–PeerTutoringinHigherEducation.London:Falmer,275–291.

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 13/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 13 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Trayner,B.,Smith,J.D.&Bettoni,M.(2006)Participationininternationalvirtuallearningcommunities AsociallearningperspectiveCPsquare!...thecommunityofpracticeoncommunitiesofpractice,retrievedJune6,2007fromhttp://www.cpsquare.org/News/archives/Webist_Setubal_Final.pdf 

TurkleS.(1997)LifeontheScreen:IdentityintheAgeoftheInternet.TouchstonePress,NewYork.Vygotsky,L.S.(1978),MindinSociety:TheDevelopmentofHigherPsychologicalProcesses,Cambridge,MA:HarvardUniversityPress.Warhurst,R.(2003)Learningtolecture:situatingtheknowingandlearningofhighereducationteaching.PaperpresentedatBritishEducationalResearchAssociationAnnualConference,Edinburgh,SeptemberWegerifR.(1998)Thesocialdimensionofasynchronouslearningnetworks.TheJournalof AsynchronousLearningNetworks2(1),34–39.Wenger,E.(1998).Communitiesofpractice:Learning,meaning,andidentity.Cambridge,:Cambridge

UniversityPress.Wenger,E.,McDermott,R.,&Snyder,W.M.(2002).Cultivatingcommunitiesofpractice:Aguidetomanagingknowledge.Boston,MA:HarvardBusinessSchoolPress.White,I.K.&Pagano,R(2007)MakingItStick:TheuseofOnlineDiscussionForatoSupportContinuingProfessionalDevelopmentinHigherEducationCommunitiesofPractice.  Proceedingsofthe2

ndInterntionalConferenceone-Learning,NewYork,28-29June,np.

Winkworth,I.&Gannon-Leary,P.(1999)Libraryperformancemeasures:governmentperspectives.Paperpresentedat: 3rdNorthumbriaInternationalConferenceonPerformanceMeasurementinLibrariesandInformationServices ,Longhirst,Northumberland,August26-31.  Wubbels,T.(2007)Doweknowacommunityofpracticewhenweseeone?TechnologyPedagogyandEducation16(2)225-233.

8/3/2019 Barriers of Elearning

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/barriers-of-elearning 14/14

 

eLearning Papers • www.elearningpapers.eu • 0 Nº 5 • September 2007 • ISSN 1887-1542 

Authors

Patricia Margaret Gannon-LearyNorthumbriaUniversity,[email protected] 

Elsa FontainhaISEG–TechnicalUniversityofLisbon,[email protected]

Citation instruction

Gannon-Leary,PatriciaMargaret&Fontainha,Elsa(2007).CommunitiesofPracticeandvirtuallearningcommunities:benefits,barriersandsuccessfactors.eLearningPapers,no.5.ISSN1887-1542.

Copyrights

Thetextspublishedinthisjournal,unlessotherwiseindicated,aresubjecttoaCreative CommonsAttribution-Noncommercial-NoDerivativeWorks 2.5

licence.Theymaybecopied,distributedandbroadcastprovidedthattheauthorandthee- journalthatpublishesthem,eLearningPapers,arecited.Commercialuseandderivativeworksarenotpermitted.Thefulllicencecanbeconsultedonhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/

Edition and productionNameofthepublication:eLearningPapersISSN:1887-1542Editedby:P.A.U.Education,S.L.Postaladdress:C/Muntaner262,3º,08021Barcelona,SpainTelephone:+34933670400Email:[email protected]:www.elearningpapers.eu


Recommended