+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Baumeister Self as Problem

Baumeister Self as Problem

Date post: 06-Apr-2018
Category:
Upload: wendy-wang
View: 251 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 14

Transcript
  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    1/14

    Journ al o f Personal i ty an d Social Psychology Copyr ight 1987 by the Am erica n Psychological Association, Inc.1987, Vol . 52, No. I , 163-176 0022-3514/87/$00.75

    H o w t h e S e lf B e c a m e a P r o b le m : A P s y c h o lo g ic a l R e v i e wo f H i s t o r i c a l R e s e a r c h

    R o y F . B a u m e i s t e rC a s e W e s t e r n R e s e r v e U n i v e r s i t y

    In this article, historica l evidence pertain ing o self ood is reviewed. A scheme of stages is delineated,according to which the mod ern se l f and i t s uncer ta int ies have evolved. The h is tor ica l data are thenreviewed in connection with the following four m ajor pro blem s regarding the self: knowing an dconceptualizing the self; defining or crea ting the self; und erstand ing on e's poten tial and fulfil l ing it;and relating the single self o society.

    M o d e r n p s y c h o l o g y h a s s h o w n c o n s i d e r a b l e in t e r e s t in u n -d e r s t a n d in g t h e s e lf . I n t e r e s t in p r o b l e m s o f s e l t h o o d h a s s p r e a df r o m t h e c l i n i c i a n s t o t h e h u m a n i s t i c p s y c h o l o g i s t s a n d h a s e v e nb e c o m e a d o m i n a n t f e a t u r e o f l a b o r a t o r y r e s e a r c h . I n d e e d , i fo n e s u r v e y s t h e e x t e n s i v e l i t e r a t u r e s o n s e l f - e s t e e m ( e . g . ,B a u m e i s t e r & T i c e , 1 9 8 5 ; S . C . J o n e s , 1 9 7 3 ) s e l f - a w a r e n e s s( e . g ., C a r ve r & Sche i e r , 1981 ; D uv a l & W ic k lu nd , 1972) , s e l f -p r e sen t a t i o n (e . g ., B aum e i s t e r , 1982 , 1986 ; Sch l enke r , 1980) ,s e l f - v e ri f i c a ti o n ( S w a n n , 1 9 8 5 ), s e l f - s c h e m a s ( e .g . , M a r k u s ,1 9 7 7 ; M a r k u s & S m i t h , 1 9 81 ), s e l f - h a n d i c a p p i n g (e . g. , E . E .Jon es & B erg l a s , 1978) , s e l f - co ncep t ( e . g ., Ep s t e in , 1973 ; G e r -gen , 1971) , an d s e l f -m o n i to r i ng (e . g . , Snyde r , 1974) , i t i s d i f f i -c u l t t o e s c a p e th e i m p r e s s i o n t h a t t h e s e l f m u s t b e r a n k e d w i t hd i s s o n a n c e a n d a t t r i b u t i o n s a s o n e o f t h e f u n d a m e n t a l i s su e st h a t h a s c o n c e r n e d s o c i a l a n d p e r s o n a l i t y p s y c h o l o g i s t s .

    T h e p r o b l e m a t i c n a t u r e o f se l f h o o d h a s c o n c e r n e d l a y p e r s o n sa s w e ll a s p ro f e s s io n a l s . P o p u l a r b o o k s a n d m o v i e s c o m m o n l yr e c o g n iz e t h e n e e d t o " f i n d o n e s e l f " a n d t o " b e o n e s el f ." E r i k -s o n ( 1 96 8 ) o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e r a p i d p o p u l a r i z a t i o n o f th e t e r mident i t y cr i s i s , o r i g i n a l l y a t e r m o f p s y c h o l o g i c a l j a r g o n , d e -n o t e d t h a t t h e r e w a s a l r e a d y w i d e s p r e a d g e n e r a l i n te r e s t i n t h ep h e n o m e n a i t d e s cr i b e d . T h e i n d i v i d u a l q u e s t f o r p e r s o n a l f u l-f i l lm e n t ( s e l f - a c t u a l iz a t i o n ) h a s b e c o m e i n c r e a s i n g l y a c c e p t e db y t h e g e n e r a l s o c i e ty a s a l e g i t im a t e a n d i m p o r t a n t a s p e c t o flife.

    I t i s p l a u s i b l e t h a t t h e s e l f s i m p l y h a s s o m e i n e f f a b l e f a s c i n a -t i o n t h a t h a s m a d e i t a p e r e n n i a l p u z z l e . O n e c a n r e a d K a n ta n d D e s c a r t e s a n d e v e n t h e a n c i e n t t h i n k e r s a s i f t h e y w e r e g r a p -p l i n g w i t h a l l t h e s e s a m e i s s u e s o f s e l fh o o d . A c a r e f u l l o o k a th i s t o r i c a l e v i d e n c e s u g g e s t s , h o w e v e r , t h a t t h e c o n c e r n w i t hp r o b l e m s o f s e lf h o o d is e ss e n t ia l ly a m o d e r n p h e n o m e n o n . T h em e d i e v a l l o r d s a n d s e r f s d i d n o t s t r u g g l e w i t h s e l f - d e f i n i t io n t h ew a y m o d e r n p e r s o n s d o .

    M y t h e s i s i s t h a t t h e s e l f h a s b e c o m e a p r o b l e m i n th e c o u r s eo f h i s t o r i c a l d e v e l o p m e n t . T h e p r e s e n t a r t i c l e re v i e w s h i s t o r i c a ld i s c u s s io n s o f d e v e l o p m e n t s th a t s h e d l i g h t o n h o w t h a t h a p -p e n e d . I h a v e o r g a n i z e d t h i s a r t i c l e a c c o r d i n g t o a n a p r i o r is c h e m e o f f o u r p r o b l e m s p e r t a i n i n g t o t h e s e l f. T h e s e p r o b l e m si n c l u d e h o w i d e n t i t y i s a c t iv e l y o r c r e a t i v e l y d e f i n e d b y t h e p e r -s o n , w h a t i s t h e n a t u r e o f t h e r e l a t i o n s h i p b e t w e e n t h e i n d i v i d -u a l a n d s o c i e ty , h o w d o e s t h e p e r s o n u n d e r s t a n d h i s o r h e r 19 0-t e n t i a l a n d t h e n f u l f il l i t, a n d h o w a n d h o w w e l l d o p e r s o n s k n o wt h e m s e l v e s .

    T h e g e n e r a l s c h e m e o f h i s t o r i c al e r as c a n b e o u t l i n e d ( a n dn a m e d ) a s f o ll o w s. T h e l a t e m e d i e v a l p e r io d , f r o m a b o u t t h e1 l t h t h r o u g h t h e 1 5 t h c e n t u r y , g r a d u a l l y d e v e l o p e d a c r y s t a l -l i z ed c o n c e p t o f th e u n i t y o f th e s i n g le h u m a n l if e. T h e e a r l ym o d e r n p e r i o d ( r o u g h l y 1 5 0 0 - 1 8 0 0 ) c a m e t o s t re s s t h e d i s ti n c -t i o n b e t w e e n t h e i n n e r s e l f a n d t h e o u t e r s e l f , t o v a l u e i n d i v i d u -a li ty , a n d i n c r e a s in g l y to r e c o g n i z e h u m a n d e v e l o p m e n t a n dc h a n ge . D u r i n g t h a t e r a , P u r i t a n i s m i n c r e a s e d s e l f- c o n s ci o u s -n e s s a n d r e c o g n i z e d t h e p o s s i b i l i ty o f s e lf - d e c e p ti o n . I n t h e R o -m a n t i c e r a ( l a t e 1 8 t h a n d e a r l y 1 9 t h c e n t u r i e s ) , p e r s o n s b e g a nt o s e e k a n d e m p h a s i z e s e c u l a r f o r m s o f f u lf i ll m e n t , a n d t h e ya c u t e l y s e n s e d a d e e p c o n f l i c t b e t w e e n t h e i n d i v i d u a l a n d s o c i -e ty . D u r i n g t h e V i c t o r i a n e r a (r o u g h l y 1 8 3 0 - 1 9 0 0 ) , t h e r e w e r ec r i se s w i th r e g a r d t o e a c h o f th e f o u r p r o b l e m s o f s e l fh o o d Ih a v e m e n t i o n e d . E a r l y in t h e 2 0 t h c e n t u r y , t h e m e s o f a l ie n a t i o na n d o f d e v a l u a t i o n o f s e l fh o o d i n d i c a t e d c o n c e r n o v e r t h e i n d i -v i d u a l ' s h e l p l es s d e p e n d e n c y o n s o c ie t y. S i n c e W o r l d W a r I I ,i n d i v i d u a l s h a v e a c c o m m o d a t e d t o t h e c h a n g e d s o c i a l r ea l i ti e sb u t h a v e c o n t i n u e d t o g r o p e f o r i d e a ls a n d m e a n s o f s el f -d e f in i -t i o n a n d f u l fi l lm e n t . (T h e g e n e r a l sc h e m e a n d d e v e l o p m e n t s a r eo u t l i n e d i n T a b l e 1 .)

    E v i d e n c e

    I wish to than k D . McFarlin, D. Peabody, S. Hanson, B. Levy , S.Matthews, D. Stevenson, G. E. Swanson, D. Tice, and an anonymousreviewer for their crit icism s and suggestions. Portion s of this article arebased on a recent book , Identity, by Roy E Baumeister, Oxford U niver-sity Press, 1986.Correspondence concerning this article should be addressed to RoyE Baumeister, who is now at the Psychology De partm ent, U niversity ofTexas at Austin, A ustin, Texas 78712.

    T h e p r e s e n t d i s c u s s i o n r e li e s on t w o r e l a t e d t y p e s o f e vi -d e n c e . O n e i s h i s t o r i c a l d a t a ; t h e o t h e r i s l i t e r a t u r e . T h e u s e o fl i t e r a t u r e ( e s p e c i a l l y f i c t io n ) a s e v i d e n c e f o r th e p r o b l e m s a n dc o n f l ic t s c o n f r o n t i n g h u m a n b e i n g s is b a s e d o n t h e a s s u m p t i o nt h a t t h e l i t e r a t u r e o f a g iv e n e r a u s e s th e m e s a n d c h a r a c t e r s t op o r t r a y c u r r e n t d i l e m m a s o f th e h u m a n c o n d i t i o n ( se e , f o r e x -a m p l e , H o u g h t o n , 1 95 7 ). C h a n g e s i n t h e m a t i c c o n t e n t a n dc h a r a c t e r i z a t i o n f r o m o n e e r a t o th e n e x t , t h e n , s u g g e s t c h a n g e si n t h e h u m a n c o n d i t i o n . T h e w r i t in g o f l iv e s, i n b i o g r a p h y a n d

    163

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    2/14

    164Table 1I s su es o f S e l fh o o d a n d H is to r ica l S tag es

    ROY E BAUMEISTER

    Self-knowledge, self- " Relation of individual toHistorical era conception Self-definition Fulfillment societyLate med ieval Unproblematic Morality & virtue Christian salvation (in "Great Chain of Be in g" -Increased sense of unity of Hono r, lory, reputation heaven) fixed, stable order

    single life (fixed criteria) (Possible) public acclaim Self equated with social,Otherwise, society defined public selfEarly modern (16thto 18th century)

    Puritan

    identity: rank, kin, etc.Concept of personal change,developmentSincerity; equivalence ofinner and outer selves, asa virtueLoss of identity throughfamily lineageIn principle, none!(predestination)

    Romantic (late 1 8 t h ,early 19thcenturies)

    Victorian (mid &late 19th century)

    Early 20th century

    Recent 20th century

    Unproblematic for own self;for others, question ofinner ru e self vs. outerapparent selfIncreased interest inindividuality, uniquenessof selfSelf-consciousnessConcern with self-deception(henceforth, self-knowledge uncertain)Need to discoverowndestiny and fulfill t(duty)Imperial, hypertrophied selfRepression, hypocrisyInvoluntaryself-disclosureImperial, "hypertrophied"selfDevaluation of selfImpossibility of completeself-knowledge Freud)

    Belief n personaluniquenessValues of self-exploration

    Individual exists prior toparticular social rolesQuest for fulfillment as self-definitionPersonality as identitySelf-reliance,ruggedindividualismAdolescenceas crisis in self-definitionSocioeconomicstatusExistential concerns,authenticityPersonality, social skillsRadical choicePersonalitySocioeconomicstatus

    Christian salvationIncipient secularfulfillment, as increativity

    Christian salvation: butindividual is helplessInner struggle to overcomesin and weaknessCreativityPassion ("romantic" love)Thus, grope for secularizedconcept of fulfillmentSeek fulfillment alone(transcendentalism)Private, family life isparamountSociety prevents fulfillment(alienation)Emotional fulfillment infamilyWork as unfulfillingQuest for celebrityQuest for means of self-actualization

    Unstable (social mobility)Some separation (privacy)

    Work: Success meanssalvation

    Individual vs. society:struggle for freedomIndividual inseparablefrom society, but canchange rolesPeaceful coexistence(transcendentalism)Change society(Progressivism,Utopianism)Hostile, critical,muckrakingAlienation

    AccommodationMyth-making

    autobiography, is an imp orta nt area of overlap of historical andliterary evidence about selfhood.

    The inter pretation of both historical and literary evidence isnecessarily more subjective than the in terpretat ion of experi-mental findings. To prevent myself from generating the supp ortfor my own con clusions (as well as to p revent mysel f from mak-ing judgments I am not qualified to make), I shall rely exclu-sively on the work o f historians and litera ry scholars, inst ead ofon direct in terpretation of evidence.

    One danger of any review article is that the co nclusions canbe no more valid than the evidence surveyed, and perhaps this isespecially true of an interdiscipl inaryreview article. The readermust be doubly cautious of my psychological conclusions basedon historical evidence, first because they are limited by thesoundness of current historical research, and second becausethey are made by a psychologist rather than a historian. I haveproceeded with this pro ject despite these risks because the on lyapparent alternative is to ignore the research in other disci-plines, which carries the opposite risk of depriving personalityand social psychology of potentially valuable info rmati on andperspectives.

    Needless to say, the generalizations in this article pertain togeneral trends rather th an to universal patterns. The purpose isto underst and the sequential development of problems o f self-hood, not to formulate strict or rigid classification of personsby historical eras. Moreover, the research reviewed herein fo-cuses on America, England, and France. Other European cou n-tries may have passed through similar stages at different times,but again, what is impor tant is the developmental sequence, notthe precise dates. My origin al intent ion was to restrict my re-search to Ame rican history. However, the recency of Americanhistory necessitated some reliance on data from Western Eu-rope, especially England. The historical roots of Ame rican civi-lization would seem to justify this use. For present purposes,the most impo rtan t divergence between English and Americanpatterns was the differential timi ng of the in fluence of Puritan-ism, which flourished in America only after its defeat in En-gland.

    S e l f - K n o w l e d g eConf idence in the hum an capac i ty for self -knowledge seem s

    to have suffered a progressive deteriora tion over the past centu-

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    3/14

    S E L F H O O D I N H I ST O R Y 1 6 5r ie s . T h i s d e v e l o p m e n t c a n b e s e e n i n t h e g r a d u a l e l a b o r a t i o no f a c o n c e p t o f t h e s e l f a s s o m e t h i n g i n c r e a s in g l y h i d d e n , a b -s t r a c t , a n d e l u s i v e . T h e s e l f c e a s e d t o b e . e q u a t e d w i t h o b s e r v -a b l e b e h a v i o r a n d c o m m i t m e n t s , a n d i t c a m e t o b e u n d e r s t o o da s t h e c a u s e a n d o w n e r o f th e v i s i b l e p h e n o m e n a .

    R e v i e w o f R e se a r chA l t h o u g h t h e i n j u n c t i o n t o " k n o w t h y s e l f " i s a r ti c u l a t e d i n

    a n c i e n t G r e e k p h i lo s o p h y , t h e r e i s n o r e a s o n t o a s s u m e t h a t s e lf -k n o w l e d g e p o s e d th e s a m e p r o b l e m f o r a n c i e n t G r e e k s a s itd o e s f o r m o d e r n c i t i z e n s . I n d e e d , g i v e n M a c l n t y r e ' s ( 1 9 8 1 )a n a l y s is o f e a r ly c o n c e p t s o f p e r s o n a s p u r e l y f u n c t i o n a l , " k n o wt h y s e l f " p r o b a b l y c a n a n d s h o u l d b e i n t e r p r e t e d a s a d v i c e t oa p p r a i s e o n e ' s t a l e n t s a n d c a p a c i t i e s a c c u r a t e l y so a s t o b e a b l et o c a r r y o u t o n e ' s d u t i e s e ff ec ti ve ly , w i t h p r u d e n t j u d g m e n t .

    L a t e m e d i e v a l a w a r e n e ss o f s el f h o o d w a s c r u d e b y m o d e ms t a n d a r d s , s u g g e s ti n g t h a t s e l f - k n o w l e d g e w a s n o t r e g a r d e d a sa n i m p o r t a n t p r o b l e m . H a n n i n g ( 1 9 7 7 ) h a s n o t e d t h a t l i t e r a -t u r e o f th e 1 l t h a n d 1 2 th c e n t u r i e s w a s j u s t b e g i n n i n g t o u s ed e v i c es b a s e d o n t h e i d e a t h a t d i f f e re n t c h a r a c t e r s i n a d r a m ah a d d i f fe r e n t p e rs p e c ti v e s o n t h e a c t io n . ( H a n n i n g ' s c o n t e n t i o nt h a t s u c h s i g n s i n d i c a t e t r u e i n d i v i d u a l i t y s e e m s a n e x a g g e r a -t i o n , u n l e s s i n d i v i d u a l i t y is d e f i n e d v e r y l o o s e l y .) T h e i n c r e a s e da w a r e n e s s o f t h e u n i t y o f t h e s i n g l e li f e i s s u g g e s t e d b y s e v e r a ld e v e l o p m e n t s, p a r t i c u l a r l y a c h a n g e i n p o p u l a r C h r i s t i a n b e l i e f sr e g a r d i n g d e a t h . A r i e s ( 19 8 1 ) n o t e d t h a t e a r l y C h r i s ti a n b e l i e f sa n d e s c h a t o l o g y v i e w e d s a l v a t i o n a s c o l l e c t iv e , b u t t h a t a r o u n dt h e 1 2 th c e n t u r y a c o n c e p t o f t h e L a s t J u d g m e n t s p r e a d t h a te m p h a s i z e d t h e j u d g i n g o f individual s o u l s ( a l s o s e e M o r r i s ,1 97 2 ). A l l t h e e v e n t s o f t h e l i fe a d d e d u p t o a m o r a l a n d s p i r i t u a ls u m , a n d t h i s t o t a l i t y d e c i d e d t h e e t e r n a l f a te .

    T h e r e i s l it t l e e v i d e n c e t h a t m e d i e v a l s e n g a g e d in i n t r o s p e c -t i o n o r e x p e r i e n c e d i n n e r s t r u g g l e s . I n d e e d , H a r m i n g ( 1 9 7 7 ) ,i n s e a r c h i n g f o r i n n e r s t r u g g l e s p o r t r a y e d i n m e d i e v a l w r i t i n g s ,c o u l d d o n o b e t t e r th a n a p o e m i n w h i c h t h e h e r o i n e p a u s e s f ora m o m e n t w h e n c o n f r o n t e d w i t h c o n fl i c ti n g i m p e r a t i v e s. W e i n -t r a u b ( 1 9 7 8 ) o b s e r v e d t h a t t h e r e m a r k a b l e s c a r c i t y o f a u t o b i o -g r a p h i c a l w r i t i n g d u r i n g t h e M i d d l e A g e s i s i ts e l f e v i d e n c e o f ad i s i n t e r e s t i n e x p l o r i n g t h e i n d i v i d u a l se l f. W e i n t r a u b f o u n do n e e x c e p t i o n a l p e r s o n ( P e t r a r c h , i n t h e 1 4 t h c e n t u r y ) w h os h o w e d i n t r o s p e c t i v e t e n d e n c i e s , b u t e v e n t h i s m a n ( w h o w a sp r o b a b l y f a r a h e a d o f hi s c o n t e m p o r a r i e s ) a p p e a r e d t o u s e i n -t r o s p e c t i o n t o a p p r a i s e h o w w e l l h e m a t c h e d t h e c o l l e c ti v e , g e n -e r a l id e a l s , a n d n o t a s a m e a n s t o w a r d i n d i v i d u a t i o n o r s e l f-fu l f i l lm en t .

    I n c i p i e n t i n t r o s p e c t i o n , a w a r e n e s s o f s e p a r a t e n e s s o f d i f f e r-e n t p e r s o n s , a n d s e n s e o f u n i t y o f e a c h s i n g l e l i fe a l l m a y b er e g a r d e d a s p r e r e q u i s i t es f o r m a k i n g s e l f- k n o w l e d g e i n t o ap r o b l e m . T h e l a t e M i d d l e A g e s s a t i s fi e d t h e s e p r e r e q u i s i t e s .

    T h e n e x t s t e p t o w a r d m a k i n g s e l f- k n o w l e d g e i n t o a p r o b l e mw a s t o c e a s e e q u a t i n g t h e s e l f w i t h i t s a p p e a r a n c e s . T r i l l in g( 1 9 7 1 ) h a s a s s e r t e d t h a t i t w a s t h e 1 6 t h c e n t u r y i n w h i c h p e o p l ef i rs t c a m e t o b e l i e v e t h a t t h e s e l f w a s a n i n n e r o r h i d d e n s p a c ea n d w a s s o m e t h i n g t o b e d i s t i n g u i sh e d f r o m t h e w a y t h e p e r s o na c t e d i n p u b l i c . T r i l l i n g d e s c r i b e d t h e 1 6 t h c e n t u r y s o c i e t y i nE n g l a n d a s o b s e s s e d w i t h d e c e p t i o n a n d p r e t e n s e ( c f. A u e r b a c h ,1 9 4 6 / 1 9 7 4 , p . 8 6 ) . In d e e d , t h e c o n c e r n w i t h c o n t r a s t s b e t w e e nm i s l e a d i n g a p p e a r a n c e s a n d u n d e r l y i n g r e a li t ie s w a s a b u n -d a n t l y r e f l e c t e d i n t h e p h i l o s o p h y , p o l i ti c s , a n d l i t e r a t u r e o f th a t

    e r a , f r o m S h a k e s p e a r e t o M a c h i a v e l l i t o B e r k e l e y . T h e g r e a t r i s ei n p o p u l a r i t y o f t h e t h e a t e r i n E n g l a n d a n d F r a n c e r e f le c t e d an e w i n t e r e s t i n a c t i n g a n d p l a y i n g r o l e s, a l t h o u g h a c t o r s w e r en o t y e t t h e c u l t u r e h e r o e s t h e y a r e t o d a y . T r i ll i n g n o t e d i n p a r -t i c u l a r t h e l i t e r a r y e m e r g e n c e o f v i ll a i n s , i n t h e s e n s e o f c h a r a c -t e r s r e c o g n i z e d a s e v il b y t h e a u d i e n c e b u t n o t b y t h e o t h e r c h a r -a c t e rs i n t h e d r a m a .

    A n a b s t r a c t , h id d e n s e l f i s h a r d e r t o k n o w a n d d e f i n e t h a n i sa c o n c r e t e , o b s e r v a b l e s e l f. T h e r e f o r e , t h e b e l i e f i n a r e a l s e l ft h a t i s h i d d e n , t h a t i s n o t d i r e c t l y o r c l e a r ly c o n t a i n e d i n o n e ' sa c t i o n s , c a n b e r e g a r d e d a s a c r i t i c a l c o m p l i c a t i o n o f s e lf -k n o w l e d g e . T h e i n n e r n a t u r e o f s e lf h o o d , w h i c h i s r e g a r d e d a sa x i o m a t i c b y m u c h m o d e r n p s y c h o l o g ic a l t h o u g h t , s e e m s t oh a v e b e c o m e a c o m m o n c o n c e p t i o n f i rs t i n t h e 1 6 th c e n t u ry .

    A t t h a t t i m e , h o w e v er , t h e p r o b l e m s e e m e d t o b e t o k n o w t h ei n n e r s e l v e s o f o t h e r s , n o t o n e ' s o w n s e lf . I n t r o s p e c t i o n f l o u r -i s h e d d u r i n g t h e 1 6 t h c e n t u r y ( W e i n t r a u b , 1 9 78 ), b u t i t d o e sn o t s e e m t o h a v e b e e n f e l t t o b e d i f f ic u l t o r l i m i t e d ( a l s o s e eA u e r b a c h , 1 9 4 6 / 1 9 74 , p p . 3 0 1 - 3 0 3 ) . T h e d i f fi c u lt y o f k n o w i n gt h e u n d e r l y i n g m o t i v e s o f o t h e r s i s a tt e s t e d b y t h e i n c r e a s i n gs t r e s s o n t h e n e w v i r t u e o f s i n c e r i t y ( T r i l li n g , 1 9 71 ). S i n c e r i t yi s a k i n d o f e q u i v a l en c e b e t w e e n t h e p u b l i c a p p e a r a n c e o f th ep e r s o n a n d t h e i n n e r s e l f t h a t i s p r e s u m e d t o b e h i d d e n b e h i n do r u n d e r n e a t h t h a t a p p e a r a n c e . M a k i n g s i n c e r i ty i n t o a n i m -p o r t a n t v i r t u e r e f le c t e d t h e n e w c o n c e r n w i t h a n d d i f fi c u lt y o fi n f e r r i n g t h e h i d d e n s e l f f r o m t h e o v e r t a c ts a n d a p p e a r a n c e s .

    W i t h P u r i t a n i s m , t h e d i f f ic u l t y o f k n o w i n g u n d e r l y in g p s y -c h o l o g i c a l r e a l i ti e s w a s e x t e n d e d t o s e l f - k n o w l e d g e . T h i s m a yh a v e d e v e l o p e d i n th e f o l l o w i n g w a y. T h e P u r i t a n d o c t r i n e o fp r e d e s t i n a t i o n m e a n t t h a t e t e r n a l d a m n a t i o n o r s a lv a t i o n w a sa l r e a d y u n c h a n g e a b l y f i x ed w h e n t h e p e r s o n w a s b o r n . C a l v i na d d e d p a r e n t h e t i c a l l y t h a t t h e r e w e r e w a y s o f t e ll i n g w h e t h e ro n e w a s a m o n g " t h e E l e c t " o r w a s d e s t i n e d t o H e l l i n s te a d . A l -t h o u g h C a l v i n s a i d n o t t o d w e l l o n w h e t h e r o n e s e l f b e l o n g e d tot h e E l e c t o r n o t , i t p r o b a b l y w a s h a r d f o r t h e t y p i c a l P u r i t a n t or e s is t w o n d e r i n g a b o u t t h e m o s t i m p o r t a n t f e a t u r e o f h i s o r h e re t e r n a l l i fe ( W e i n t r a u b , 1 9 7 8) . T h e r e f o r e , a s m o s t h i s t o r i a n ss e e m t o a g r e e , P u r i t a n s b e c a m e s e l f- c o n s c io u s t o a n u n p r e c e -d e n t e d d e g r e e . In d e e d , W h y t e ( 1 9 6 0 ) r e c o r d e d t h a t c o n s c i o u s -n e s s a n d s e l f- a w a r e n es s fi rs t c a m e t o b e r e c o g n i z e d a s i m p o r t a n tc o n c e p t s a n d v a l u e s d u r i n g t h e 1 7 th c e n t u r y , a s i n d i c a t e d i np a r t b y t h e f ir s t a p p e a r a n c e o f t h o se t e r m s ( w i th t h e m o d e r nm e a n i n g ) i n E n g l i sh a n d G e r m a n w r i t in g s . A l i f e t im e o f s e lf -s c r u t i n y , h o w e v e r , t e n d e d t o b r i n g m a n y P u r i t a n s t o r e a l i z e t h a tt h e y w e r e e s p e c i a l l y s e e k i n g f a v o r a b l e s i gn s , b e c a u s e t h e y n a t u -r a l ly w a n t e d t o b e l i e v e t h e m s e l v e s a m o n g t h e E l e c t. T h e p o s s i-b i l i t y t h u s a r o s e t h a t t h e y w e r e d e c e i v i n g th e m s e l v e s a b o u t t h e i rp i e t y , f a i t h , a n d v i r t u e ( W e i n t r a u b , 1 9 7 8 ). O n c e t h e r e c o g n i t i o no f s e l f - d e c e p t i o n , a n d o f m o t i v e s f o r s e l f - d e c e p t i o n , b e c a m ef i r m l y e st a b l is h e d , s e lf - k n o w l ed g e w a s d o o m e d t o r e m a i n t e n t a -t iv e a n d u n c e r t a i n .

    T h e c o n t r i b u t i o n o f t h e R o m a n t i c e r a t o t h e d i f fi c u lt y o f s el f-k n o w l e d g e w a s p r i m a r i l y th e e m p h a s i s o n t h e u n i q u e , i n d i v i d -u a l d e s t i n y a n d p o t e n t i a l o f e a c h p e r s o n , w h i c h t h a t p e r s o n w a sp r e s u m a b l y o b l i g e d b y s o m e c o s m i c d u t y t o d i s c o v er a n d f u lf il l.I s h a l l c o v e r t h i s d e v e l o p m e n t i n g r e a t e r d e t a i l l a te r , i n t h e s e c -t i o n o n f u l f i l l m e n t a n d p o t e n t i a l . A s e c o n d f e a t u r e o f t h i s e r aw a s t h e e x p a n s i o n o f th e r e a l m o f t h e h i d d e n s e lf . F o r e x a m p l e ,A n d e r s o n ( 1 97 l ) c h a r a c t e r i z e d t h e s e l f o f 1 9 th c e n t u r y l i te r a -t u r e a s t h e hypertrophied self, a n d S y p h e r (1 9 6 2 ) m a d e a s i m i l a r

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    4/14

    166 R O Y E B A U ME I STE Robse r va t i on r eg a r d i ng t he ex t end ed s cope o f t he s e l f a t t h i s t i me .T hus , t he t a sk o f se l f -know l edge w as i nc r eased : A s t he s i ze o ft he s e l f w as deeme d g r ea te r , the r e w as m or e an d m or e o f t he s e l ft o k n o w . O n e a r e a o f e x p a n s io n w a s p e r so n a li ty . D u r i n g t h e19 t h cen t u r y , pe r sona l i t y ( r a t he r t han soc i a l r ank and r o l e s )came t o be i nc r eas i ng l y r ega r ded a s a , even the, cen t r a l a spec to f t he s el f. O n e sour ce o f ev idence f o r t h i s deve l opm en t i s tr endsi n b i og r aph i ca l w r i t i ng , w h i ch sh i f t ed t o emphas i ze pe r sona lma ter ia l (Al t ick, 1965). Indee d, Al t ick asser ted th at l i t e raryc r i t i c i sm dur i ng t he 19 t h cen t u r y began t o use t he work as am e a n s f o r u n d e r st a n d i n g t h e person w h o c r e a t e d i t, w h i c h w a sa r ad i ca l depa r t u r e f r om t r ad i t i ona l a t t i t udes and appr oaches .

    T he ex t ens ivenes s o f t he h i d den pa r t s o f t he s e l f w as i nc r easedby V i c t o r i an r ep r e s si veness . T he h ab i t s o f s e lf - s c r u t i ny (w h i chb y t h e n w e r e w i d e sp r e ad ) , c o m b i n e d w i t h t h e i m p o s s i b l y h ig hmo r a l s t anda r ds , f o r ced V i c t o r i ans t o b ecom e se l f- decep t ive (c f.H o u g h t o n , 1 9 5 7 , a l t h o u g h t h i s o b s e r v a t i o n i s c o m m o n p l a c enow ) . I ndeed , i t cou l d be sugges t ed t ha t t he e x t en t o f V i c t o r i anse l f - decep t i on made i t i nev i t ab l e t ha t some i ns i gh t f u l pe r sonw ou l d even t ua l ly beg i n t o s ee t h r ough i t al l, pe r mi t t i ng t he sys -t e m a t i c a c c o u n t i n g o f t e c h n i q u e s a n d m o t i v e s f o r s e lf -d e c e p-t i on . F r eud ' s accompl i shmen t i n t h i s r ega r d has been su f f i -c i en t l y i n f l uen t ia l t ha t f ew peop l e now adays can r ega r d t he a t -t a i nm en t o f compl e t e s e l f- know l edge a s a p r ac t i ca l pos s i b il it y .( C e r t a i n my s t i c i sms may cons t i t u t e excep t i ons . )

    I n t h i s connec t i on , i t i s i n t e r e s t i ng t ha t V i c t o r i ans be l i evedt he i nne r s e l f w ou l d be r evea l ed i nvo l un t a r il y , so one h ad t o bec o n s t a n tl y o n g u a r d . S e n n e t t ( 1 9 7 4 ) c o n t e n d e d t h a t p e o p l ec a m e t o f ee l a l a rm e d a n d t h r e a t e n e d b y t h e b e l i ef t h a t o t h e r scou l d dedu ce t he i r pe r sona li t ie s , i nc l ud i ng p r i va t e t hough t s an dwishes , f rom looking a t thei r c lothes and other subt le t ies . Byabou t 1850, u r ban c l o t h i ng s ty l e s had b ecom e pa i ns t ak i ng l yd r a b a n d i n ex p r es s iv e , a n d m a n y V i c t o ri a n w o m e n s i m p l y r e -f used t o go ou t i n pub l i c i n d ay l i gh t f o r f ea r o f be i ng l ooked a t( Senne t t , 1974) . T he V i c t o r i an be l i e f and f a sc i na t i on w i t h t hei n v o l u n t a r y d i s c lo s u r e o f e m o t i o n i s e x e m p l if i ed b y t h e p o p u l a rS h e r lo c k H o l m e s n o v e ls o f t h a t e r a a n d i s p r o b a b l y b e h i n dF r e u d ' s ( 1 9 0 5 / 1 9 5 9 ) f a m o u s a s s e r t i o n t h a t " B e t r a y a l o o z e sf r o m e v e r y p o r e ."

    T hu s , t he d i f f i cu l ty and t he des i r ab i l it y o f s e lf - know l edgew er e w e ll e s t ab li shed cu l t u r a l a t t i tudes by t he beg i nn i ng o f t he20 t h cen t u r y . I t is no t neces sa r y t o i nvoke an y f u r t he r deve l op-m e n t s d u r i n g t h e 2 0 t h c e n t u r y t o e x p l a i n w h y s e l f- k n o w le d g ei s a p r ob l em . T w o specu l a t i ons dese r ve men t i on , how eve r. F i r st ,t he i nc r eas ing f a i lu r e and ab and on me nt o f r e l ig i ous fa i t h mayhave depr i ved m ode r n c i t i z ens o f access t o a f i xed s e t o f answ er st o p r ob l em s i n i n t e r p r e t ing t he s e l f (e .g . , J ung , 1928 / 19 71 ; a l sosee R ie f f , 1968) . Second , t he p r o f ou nd i n t e r e st i n e xp l o r i ng t hese l f ma y have been i nc r ease d by i nd i v i dua l is t i c ch i l d - r ea r i ngpa t t e r ns .Conclusion

    T w o c r uc i a l deve l opmen t s s eem t o have m ade s e l f - know l edgei n t o a p r ob l em . T he f ir st w as com i ng t o r ega r d t he s e l f a s some-t h i ng s epa r a t e f r om, and som e t i mes expr e s sed by , i t s man i f e s t a -t i ons i n v i s ib l e ac t i on ; t h is appea r s t o have oc cur r e d du r i ng t hee a r ly m o d e r n p e r i o d . T h e s e c o n d w a s t h e i n c r ea s i n g m o t i v a t i o nt o dece i ve onese l f , e spec i a l l y among t he Pur i t ans and V i c t o r i -a n s , c o m b i n e d w i th t h e c o n c o m i t a n t r e c o g n i ti o n t h a t t h e p r e v a -

    l ence o f s e l f -decep t i on r end e r ed a l l s e lf - know l edge suspec t andunr e l i ab l e .

    P o t e n t i a l a n d F u l f i l l m e n tM a s l o w ( 1 9 6 8 ) h a s e m p h a s i z e d t h e c e n t r a l i m p o r t a n c e o f f ul -

    f i ll men t ( s e l f - ac tua l i za t ion ) f o r und e r s t and i ng t he s e lf . H i s gen -e r a l s cheme w as de ri ved f r om t he w o r k o f H e i degge r (1927) ,a c c o r d i n g t o w h o m t h e p r e s e n t s e lf h a s a n u m b e r o f p o t e n ti a li -t ie s f o r f u t u r e be i ng ; som e o f t he se becom e f u l f il led w he r eas o t h -e r s do n o t . T h e gu i d i ng con cep t o f po t en t i a l f u l f il l men t g ivesm e a n i n g a n d p u r p o s e t o t h e p r e s e n t s el f. S o m e e m p i r i c a l c o n -f i r ma t i on o f t he i mp or t an ce o f the se r e l a t ionsh i ps , a t l e a st f o rm a l e a d u l t s , w a s p r o v i d e d b y L e v i n s o n , D a r r o w , K l e i n , L e v i n -s o n , a n d M c K e e ( 1 9 7 8 ) .

    T h r e e t y p e s o f p r o b l e m s a r e a s s o c i a te d w i t h p o t e n t i a l a n df u l fi l lmen t . O ne i s how t o f o r m a spec i fi c conc ep t o f one ' s po -t en t i a l, t ow ar d w h i ch o ne m ay s t ri ve . T he s econd i s how t o f u lf il lt ha t po t en t i a l . T he t h i r d i s how t o t o l e r a t e t he f r us t r a t i on andd i s appo i n t men t a s soc i a t ed w i t h nonf u l f i l l men t , w h i ch i s i nev i -table to so me deg ree (cf . May, Angel , & El lenberger , 1958, againon th e bas i s of Heidegger , 1927).Review of Research

    E a c h o f th e t h r e e p r o b l e m s o f p o t e n ti a l a n d f u lf i ll m e n t h a sbeen r a i s ed by h i s t o r i ca l deve l opmen t s . M ed i eva l C hr i s t i an i t yh a d s o lv e d t h e m a ll . T h e g u i d i n g c o n c e p t o f h u m a n p o t e n ti a lf u l f il l men t w as t he s am e f o r a l l med i eva l pe r sons : s a l va t i on i nheaven . T he t echn i que w as a t fi rs t a s i mpl e m a t t e r o f pa r t i c i pa -t i on i n chu r ch r i t ua l o r, p re f e r ab ly , i n mo nas t i c a s ce t i c i sm . T hel a t e r Mi dd l e A ges i nc r eas i ng l y empha s i zed v i r t ue and p i e t y i no n e ' s p e r s o n a l b e h a v i o r as t h e m e a n s o f b e in g j u d g e d w o r t h y o fe ternal sa lvat ion. St i ll , there we re c lear guidel ines for wo rkingt o w a r d s a l v a ti o n . A l t h o u g h M o r r i s ( 1 9 7 2 ) n o t e d t h a t 1 2 th c e n -t u r y m o n a s t i c s d e b a t e d t h e p r o p e r f o r m s o f m o n a s t i c l if e, s u c hdeba t e s do n o t den o t e a l ack o f t echn i q ues b u t , r a the r , a su r p luso f ideas f o r t he de t a il s o f t e chn i qu e . F i na l ly , t he p r ob l em o f non-f u l f il l men t w as de f l ec t ed because f u l f il l men t w as pos t po ned un-t i l a f t e r dea t h . F r us t r a t i on and nonf u l f i l l men t du r i ng l i f e w er et he r e f o r e t o be expec t ed bu t no t t o be t aken t o o s e ri ous ly .

    T h e C h r i s ti a n s o l u t i o n t o t h e q u e s t i o n s o f h u m a n p o t e n t ia la n d f u l f i l l m e n t u n d o u b t e d l y d o m i n a t e d m e d i e v a l l i f e a n dt hou gh t ( e .g ., B e l l ah , 1964 ; H u i z i nga , 1924 / 1954) , bu t t he r emay have been some conce r n w i t h t h i s - w or l d l y f u l f i l l men t .C h i va l r y w as t he m a i n such i dea l pe r t a i n i ng t o ea r t h l y l if e (e .g .,H a n n i n g , 1 9 7 7 ; T u c h m a n , 1 9 78 ). C h i v a l r y h a d t w o c o m p o -nen t s : hon or ( de r iv i ng f r om m ar t i a l p r ow ess ) and l ove. T o someex t en t , o f cour se , t he se w er e subsu me d un de r C hr i s t ian i t y . T h eC r u s a d e s, f o r e x a m p l e , e p i t o m i z e d t h e a c h i e v e m e n t o f s al v a-t i o n b y m e a n s o f f ig h ti n g . ( I n d e e d , T u c h m a n h a s r e c o r d e d h o wP o p e s w o u l d a b s o l v e e m b a r k i n g c r u s a d e r s i n a d v a n c e f o r a l la t roci t i es . )

    T h e i m p o r t a n c e o f lo v e a s a m e a n s o f p e r s o n a l f u lf il lm e n t i nmed i eva l l if e is d if f icu l t t o gauge . H an n i n g( 1 97 7) d i s cus sed t hepor t r aya l o f cou r t l y love i n 12 t h cen t u r y l i t e ra t u r e . F i ed l e r( 1966 / 1982) , how eve r , obse r ved t ha t mos t med i eva l po r t r aya l so f love w er e pe r i phe r a l t o t he d r am a t i c t hem es , excep t f o r a f ewgr ea t s t o r i e s o f adu l t e ry , w h i ch t yp i ca l l y i dea l ized an i mposs i b l el ove ( e.g. , L ance l o t and G ui neve r e , o r T r i s tan and I so lde ) . S t one

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    5/14

    S E L F H O O D I N H I ST O R Y 1 6 7( 1 9 7 7 ) h a s a r g u e d t h a t h a r d l i f e , a r r a n g e d m a r r i a g e , p o o rh e a l th , a n d l a c k o f o p p o r t u n i t y m e a n t t h a t t h e e x p e r i e n c e o fp a s s i o n a t e l o v e w a s a r a r i t y f o r a l l b u t t h e p r i v i l e g e d m e m b e r so f a f ew r o y a l c o u r t s , e v e n a f t e r t h e M i d d l e A g e s e n d e d . O n t h eo t h e r h a n d , H u n t ( 1 9 7 0) h a s a s s e r t e d th a t t h e s y s t e m o f a r-r a n g e d m a r r i a g e s d i d h a v e t o c o n t e n d w i t h p r e f e r e n c e s a n d i n -c l i n a t io n s o f t h e y o u n g p e r s o n s ( a l th o u g h t h e e x i s t e n c e o f p r e f -e r e n c e s s t i ll d o e s n o t n e c e s s a r i l y m e a n p a s s i o n a t e l o v e) . M y i n -f e r e n c e i s t h a t m e d i e v a l p e r s o n s d i d o c c a s i o n a l l y fe e l p a s s i o n a t ea t t r a c t i o n s t o e a c h o t h e r , a n d t h e r e w a s s o m e l i m i t e d r e c o g n i -t i o n o f p a s s i o n a t e l o v e a s a p o w e r f u l s ta t e , b u t i t d i d n o t h a v e ac e n t r a l p l a c e i n m e d i e v a l li fe . I n d e e d , a n d o f s p e c i a l i m p o r t a n c ef o r th e d i s c u s s io n o f h u m a n g o a l s o f f u l fi l lm e n t , p e rs o n s w h ow e r e n o t i n l o v e d i d n o t u s u a l l y w i s h t o b e i n l o v e . S t o n e ( 1 9 7 7 )r e c o r d e d t h a t e v e n i n e a r l y m o d e r n E n g l a n d t h e p e r s o n i n l o vew a s r e g a r d e d w i t h c o n d e s c e n s io n a n d s o m e t i m e s d e r i s i o n b y t h er e s t o f s o c ie t y . P a s s i o n a t e l o v e , th u s , w a s n o t i d e a l i z e d a s a n e c -e s s a r y i n g r e d i e n t f o r a f u l f il l e d l i fe , u n l i k e t o d a y .

    D u r i n g t h e e a r l y m o d e r n p e r i o d , a n e w i n t e r e st i n l a te c h i l d -h o o d w a s c h a r a c t e r i z e d b y t h e a t ti t u d e t h a t c h i l d r e n w e r e u n -f o r m e d c r e a t u r e s w h o m i g h t t u r n o u t g o o d o r b a d , d e p e n d i n go n g u i d a n c e ( A r i e s , 1 9 6 2 ) . T h i s v i e w s e e m s t o e m p h a s i z e t h ep o t e n t i a l i t y i n h e r e n t i n t h e c h i l d . T h e s o l i c i t o u s i n t e r e s t i n t h ec h i l d ' s d e v e l o p m e n t f ir s t r e c e i v e d a m o r a l f o c u s , a n d e d u c a -t i o n a l p r a c t ic e s e m p h a s i z e d i n s ti l li n g v i rt u e i n c h i l d r e n . T h em e a n s w e r e o f t e n b r u t a l ; f or e x a m p l e , S t o n e ( 1 9 7 7 ) s a i d t h a tt h e b e a t i n g o f B r i ti s h s c h o o l b o y s r e a c h e d a n a l l - ti m e h i g h d u r -i n g t h is p e r i o d . F o r t h e p r e s e n t d i s c u ss i o n , t h e i m p o r t a n t p o i n ti s th e h e i g h t e n e d b e l i e f i n t h e h u m a n p o s s i b i l it y f o r g r o w t h a n dc h a n g e. T h i s b e l i e f i n p o t e n t i a l a n d d e v e l o p m e n t o u t l a s t e d t h er e l i g i o u s , m o r a l c o n t e x t i n w h i c h i t w a s f i r st a p p l i e d .

    M a c I n t y r e ( 1 9 8 1 ) h a s p r o v i d e d a p o w e r f u l a n a l y s is o f h o wt h e u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f h u m a n p o t e n t i a l d e t e r io r a t e d i n t o c h a o sd u r i n g t h e 1 8 t h c e n t u r y . H e e m p h a s i z e d t h a t t h e t r a d i t i o n a lv i e w o f m o r a l i t y w a s a s a s e t o f r u le s a n d t e c h n i q u e s f o r e n a -b l i n g t h e p e r s o n t o f u l fi l l h i s o r h e r ( f u n c t i o n a l ) p o t e n t i a l . I n h i sv ie w , t h e t r a d i t i o n a l m o r a l s c h e m e h a d t h r e e e l e m e n t s : " u n t u -t o r e d h u m a n n a t u r e , m a n - a s - h e - c o u l d - b e - if - h e - r e a li z e d - h i s -t e lo s , a n d t h e m o r a l p r e c e p t s w h i c h e n a b l e h i m t o p a s s f r o m t h eo n e s t a t e t o t h e o t h e r " ( 1 9 8 1 , p . 5 2 ) . T h e s e c o n d e l e m e n t w a sl o s t, a c c o r d i n g t o M a c I n t y r e , w h e n C h r i s t i a n i t y ( a lo n g w i t h i t sA r i s t o t e l i a n e m b e l l i s h m e n t s ) l o s t i t s h o l d o n s o c i e ty . T h i s o c -c u r r e d t h r o u g h o u t t h e e a r l y m o d e r n p e r i o d ( A u e r b a c h , 1 9 4 6 /1 97 4 ). T h e i n t e l l e c t u a l s re j e c t e d C h r i s t i a n t h o u g h t ( o r , t o k e e pt h e i r j o b s , g a v e i t a m b i g u o u s a n d e v a s i v e l i p se r v i c e ; se e H e g e l ,1 8 2 9 /1 9 6 6 , f o r a f a m o u s e x a m p l e ) , a n d t h e c o m m o n p e o p l ec e a s e d t o u s e t h e i r C h r i s t i a n f a i t h a s t h e c e n t r a l o r g u i d i n g i m a g -e r y f o r u n d e r s t a n d i n g t h e i r l iv e s ( e .g . , F i e d l e r , 1 9 6 6 / 1 9 8 2 ) . M a c -I n t y r e w e n t o n t o s a y th a t t h i s d e v e l o p m e n t c o n v e r t e d m o r a l i t yf r o m b e i n g a s e t o f r u l e s f o r a c h i e v i n g f u l f i l lm e n t o f o n e ' s ( p o -t e n t i a l ) t r u e n a t u r e t o b e i n g j u s t a s e t o f r u l e s w i t h n e i t h e r d i -v i n e l e g i t i m a t i o n n o r t e l e o l o g i c a l b a s i s . T h e a t t e m p t t o e x p l a i nw h y a n y o n e s h o u l d f o l lo w s u c h r u l e s w a s t h e " q u i x o t i c a n d i m -p o s s i b l e " ta s k e m b r a c e d b y t h e m o r a l p h i l o s o p h e r s o f t h a t e r a ,a c c o r d i n g t o M a c l n t y r e . F o r t h e p r e s e n t d i s c u s s i o n , t h e k e yp o i n t i s t h a t t h e m a i n m e a n s o f a c h i e v in g f u l fi l lm e n t , a n d t h em a i n c o n c e p t o f i t, w e r e d i s c r e d it e d .

    M a c I n t y r e c o n t i n u e d t h a t t h e d e m i s e o f t r a d i t io n a l C h r i s t i a nm o r a l i ty , a s u n d e r s t o o d b y m e d i e v a l s, e n t a i le d t h e d e m i s e o f t h ev i e w t h a t a p e r s o n w a s i n e v i t a b l y a n d e s s e n t i a l l y r e q u i r e d t o

    d i s c h a r g e t h e o b l i g a t i o n s o f t h e r a n k a n d s t a ti o n t o w h i c h t h a tp e r s o n w a s b o r n . T h e b l a c k s m i t h ' s s o n , fo r e x a m p l e , w a s n ol o n g e r i n e l u c t a b l y a n d e s s e n t i a ll y t i e d t o a m o r a l d u t y t o b e -c o m e a l o y a l a n d p i o u s b l a c k s m i t h h i m s e lf ; a n d e v e n i f he d i db e c o m e o n e , h e w a s a p e r s o n f i rs t a n d a b l a c k s m i t h s e c o n d , t op u t i t c r u d e l y . I n M a c I n t y r e ' s w o r d s , s t a r t i n g i n t h e 1 8 t h c e n -t u r y " m a n i s t h o u g h t o f a s an i n d i v i d u a l p r i o r to a n d a p a r t f r o ma l l r o l e s " ( 1 9 8 1 , p . 5 6 ) . P e r s o n s t h u s m a y b e p e r m i t t e d t oc h o o s e t h e i r o w n f o r m s o f p o t e n t i a l t o t r y t o f u l fi l l, i n s t e a d o fj u s t a c c e p t i n g w h a t s o c i e t y a s s i g n e d t h e m . A p e r s o n ' s p o t e n t i a lw a s t h u s a n o p e n q u e s t io n , n o t a f i x e d a n d k n o w n m a t t er .C l e ar ly , t h i s d e v e l o p m e n t a l so c o n t r i b u t e d t o m a k i n g h u m a np o t e n t i a l p r o b l e m a t i c .

    T h e R o m a n t i c e r a i s p e r h a p s b e s t k n o w n f o r i t s q u e s t s t o r e -p l a c e C h r i s t i a n s a l v a t io n w i t h v i a b l e, s e c u l a r im a g e s o f h u m a nf u l f i l l m e n t i n l i f e o n e a r t h . T h e i r e f f o r t s f o c u s e d o n w o r k , e s p e -c i a l l y c r e a t i v e a r t , a n d i n n e r p a s s i o n , e s p e c i a l l y l o ve . T h e s e t w ow e r e n o t c o m p l e t e l y s e p a r a t e , o f c o u r se . T h e a m o r o u s e x p l o i tsa n d t h e m e s o f s o m e R o m a n t i c p o e t s a r e w e ll k n o w n , a n d A l t i c k( 1 9 6 5) n o t e d t h a t t h e h e i g h t e n e d b i o g r a p h i c a l i n t e r e s t i n a r t i s t s 'l iv e s d u r i n g t h e e a r l y 1 9 th c e n t u r y a r o s e f r o m t h e c o m m o n b e -l i e f t h a t a r t i s t s li v e d r ic h i n n e r l iv e s .

    T h e R o m a n t i c c o n c e p t s o f h u m a n f u l fi l lm e n t in t e r m s o f p a s -s i o n a t e l o v e a n d c r e a t i v e w o r k , i n t h e c o n t e x t o f a r i c h i n n e rl if e , d e s e r v e f u rt h e r c o m m e n t b e c a u s e t h e y c o n t i n u e t o b e o u rc l e a r es t c o n c e p t s o f h u m a n f u l f il l m e n t t o d ay . I n d e e d , o n e c a nq u e s t i o n w h e t h e r t h e p s y c h o l o g i c a l d i s c u s s i o n s o f s e l f - a c t u a l iz a -t i o n ( c f. M a s lo w , 1 9 6 8 ; R o g e rs , 1 9 6 1 ) h a v e a d d e d a n y t h i n g t ot h e m e x c e p t , p e r h a p s , p s y c h o l o g i c a l h e a l t h , a s in R o g e r s '" o p e n n e s s t o e x p e r i e n c e " i n s t e a d o f n e u r o t i c d e f e n s iv e n e ss .

    WorkC r e a t i v e a r t c a n o n l y b e p r a c t i c e d b y a s m a l l m i n o r i t y o f s o c i-e t y . A c r e a t i v e l y p r o b l e m - s o l v i n g a t t i t u d e c a n , h o w e v e r , b e a p -

    p l i e d in m a n y t a s k s, a s M a s l o w ( 1 9 68 ) h a s p o i n t e d o u t , s o w o r kc o u l d i n p r i n c i p l e b e a p o w e r f u l so u r c e o f f u lf i ll m e n t in m o d e r nl if e . S u c h a n e m p h a s i s o n w o r k c o u l d n o t b e c r e d i t e d t o ( o rb l a m e d o n ) t h e R o m a n t i c s e n t i re l y . I t w a s P u r i t a n i s m ( or , m o r eg e n e r a l ly , P r o t e s t a n t i s m ) t h a t f i r s t t r e a t e d w o r k a s a n e s s e n t i a lh u m a n a c t iv i ty . T h i s e m p h a s i s o n w o r k w a s a P u r i t a n d o c t r i n et h e i n f l u e n c e o f w h i c h f a r o u t l a s t e d i t s r e l i g i o u s c o n t e x t ( c f.W e i n t r a u b ' s , 1 9 7 8 , d i s c u s s io n o f B e n F r a n k l i n ) .

    T h r e e d e v e l o p m e n t s d u r i n g t h e 1 9 th a n d 2 0 t h c e n t u r i e s s u g-g e s t t h a t t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f f i n d i n g f u l f i ll m e n t i n w o r k h a s d e -c l i n e d o r b e e n l o st . F ir s t , t h e r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n p r o d u c e r a n dc u s t o m e r h a s b e c o m e i n c r e a s i n g l y i m p e r s o n a l ( H a r r i s , 1 98 1).H a r r i s h a s c o n t e n d ed t h a t t h e p o o r w o r k m a n s h i p a n d u n c o o p -e r a t iv e n e s s o f " s e r v i c e " p e r s o n n e l s t e m s f r o m t h e a p a t h y e n g e n -d e r e d b y t h e l a c k o f o n g o i n g s o c i al b o n d s b e t w e e n w o r k e r s a n dc u s t o m e r s , u n l i k e t h e b o n d s t h a t c h a r a c t e r i z e t r i b a l o r e v e ns m a l l - t o w n s o c i e ti e s .

    S e c o n d , t h e m e a n i n g o f s u c c es s h a s c h a n g e d . L a s c h ( 1 9 7 8)a r g u e d t h a t f o r t h e e a r l y A m e r i c a n s s u c c e s s m e a n t a n i n t e rn a l ,e v e n s p i r i tu a l t r i u m p h , n o t a c o m p e t i t iv e o r a c q u i s it i v e c o u p .V e b l e n n o t e d a s e a r ly a s 1 8 9 9 t h a t " c o n s p i c u o u s c o n s u m p t i o n "w a s n o l o n g e r r e s t r ic t e d t o t h e " l e i s u r e c l a s s. " T h e c o n s u m p t i o no f q u a l i t y g o o d s i s a n i n d i c a t i o n o f w e U - t o - d o s uc c e ss , a n d c o n -s p i c u o u s n e s s i n d i c a t e s t h e p u b l i c a n d c o m p e t i t iv e n a t u r e o f t h ei d e a l s u c c e ss . L a s c h a s s e r t e d f l a t ly t h a t " s u c c e s s i n o u r s o c i e t y

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    6/14

    168 ROY E BAUMEISTERhas t o be r a t i f ied by p ub l i c i t y" ( 1978 , p . 60 ) . H e sugges t ed f u r -t he r t ha t t he des i r e f o r pub l i c r ecogn i t i on has a l t e r ed f r om ades i r e f o r f ame ( i . e . , r e spec t and r ecogn i t i on f o r one ' s accom-p l i shmen t s ) t o t he des i re t o be a ce l eb r i t y ( i. e.~ t o be kno w n andr ecogn i zed , e spec i a l ly a s a pe r sona l i t y ) . T r i ll i ng ( 1955) m ade as i mi l a r po i n t .

    T h i r d , t h e n a t u r e o f th e w o r k h a s c h a n g e d f u n d a m e n t a l ly ,e v e n w i th i n a g i v e n o c c u p a t i o n . B r a v e r m a n ( 1 9 7 4 ) n o t e d t h a tdivision of labor has t w o mean i ngs . E ven p r i mi t i ve soc i e t i e shave a soc i a l d i v i s ion o f labor b y w h i ch d i f f e ren t pe r sons co n-t r i bu t e d i f f e r en t p r od uc t s and s e r v ice s t o t he soc i e ty . H ow eve r ,B r a v e r m a n a r g u e d , o n l y m o d e r n s o c i e ty h a s p r o d u c e d t h e d e -t a il o r t a sk d i v i s ion o f l abor by w h i ch ea ch t a sk i s subd i v i dedi n t o com pon en t s t ha t a r e a s s i gned t o d if f e r en t pe r sons . T h i s de -v e l o p m e n t, a c c o r d i n g t o B r a v e r m a n , f o ll o w ed f r o m m a n a g e -men t ' s d i s cove r y t ha t p r o f i t s cou l d be g r ea t l y i nc r eased by ap -p l i ca t ion o f t he t heo r i e s o f B abbage ( 1832 / 196 3) . B abbag e ob -s e rv e d t h a t i f o n e m e c h a n i c b u i l t t h e e n t i re p r o d u c t , h e s p e n tm u c h o f h is t im e d o i n g s i m p l e t as k s , b u t h e h a d t o b e p a i d a c -co r d i ng t o a l evel o f sk il l su f f ic i en t t o pe r f o r m t he h a r des t t a sk .B y h i r in g c h e a p l a b o r t o p e r f o r m t h e s i m p l e p a r t s o f t h e j o b ,t h e e x p e n si v e l a b o r o f t h e m e c h a n i c c o u l d b e c o n s e r v e d o n l y f o rthe har d par t s , thus rea l iz ing subs tan t ia l savings. Ho wever , therei s a d r am a t i c bu t h i dden psycho l og i ca l cos t i n t ha t r eo r gan i za -t i on o f labor , a s B r ave r m an exp l i ca t ed w i t h exc r uc i a t i ng t ho r -o u g h n e s s . E v e r y o n e ' s w o r k ( i n c lu d i n g t h a t o f t h e m o s t s k il le dand expens i ve mech an i c s ) beco mes r epe t it i ve and l ose s it s v is i-b l e i den t if i ca t ion w i t h t he p r od uc t i ve p r oces s a s a w ho l e , a s w e lla s w it h t h e p r o d u c t . T h u s , t h e o p p o r t u n i t i e s t o e n j o y a n d t a k ep r i d e i n o n e ' s w o r k a r e d e g r ad e d . B r a v e r m a n m a d e c l e a r t h a tt h i s r eo r gan i za t i on o f w or k pe r t a i ns no t on l y t o a s sembl y - l inemanuf ac t u r i ng bu t t o w h i t e - co l l a r w or k a s w e l l , w i t h equa l l ypern ic ious ef fect s (a l so see Larkin, 1979).

    I n t h e w a k e o f s u c h d e v e l o p m e n t s , w o r k s e e m s t o h a v e u n d e r -gone a sh i f t f r om i n t r i n s i c t o ex t r i n s i c mot i va t i ons . O ne ' s po -t en t ia l i n w o r k becam e conce i ved o f i n t e r m s o f pos s i b il i ti e s f o radvancemen t , p r e s t i ge , and paymen t ( s a l a r y po t en t i a l ) , r a t he rt han i n t e r ms o f in t r i n s i c s a t i sf ac t i on f r om pe r f o r mi n g t he w or kactivi t ies.

    I t d e s e r v e s m e n t i o n t h a t m o d e r n w o r k s c h e d u l e s h a v e i n -c r e a se d t h e a m o u n t o f l ei s ur e t i m e , t h e r e b y o p e n i n g n e w p o s s i-bi l it i es for ful fi l lment . Th e po ss ibi l i ty of creat ive ful f i l lmentt h r oug h l e i su r e ac ti v i ti e s cann o t be d i s co un t ed . S ti ll , a cu r s o r yp e r u sa l o f t h e m o s t p o p u l a r l e i su r e a c t i v i t i e s - -p r o b a b l y m o r et i me i s spen t w a t ch i ng t e l ev is i on t han on a l l o t he r l e i su r e ac t i v i-t ie s com bi n ed - - s oo n d i s cove r s t ha t c r ea t i v i t y i s no t an e s sen ti a lor pervas ive fea ture .Love

    O u r mo der n cu l t u r e r ega r ds pas s i ona t e l ove a s a cen t r a l con-ce r n and pow er f u l i dea l o f pe r sona l f u l f i ll men t . L ov e has com et o b e r e g a r d e d a s t h e p r i m a r y a n d o f t e n th e o n l y p r o p e r b a s isf o r mar r i age , con t r a r y t o ea r l i e r a t t it udes ( c f . S t one ' s , 1977 , ex -t ens ive d i s cus s i on o f t he evo l u t i on o f c r i te r i a f o r m a t e cho i ce ) .A n d a pe r son w ho goes t h r ou gh l if e w i t hou t l ove w il l t yp i ca l l ybe r ega r d ed a s un f u l f il led .

    T h e m a i n d r a w b a c k o f lo v e as a v i a b l e f o r m o f f u lf i ll m e n t i st h e i m p e r m a n e n c e o f p a ss io n . F i e d l er ( 1 9 6 6 / 1 9 8 2 ) o b s e r v e dt h a t a l th o u g h m a n y n o v e l s e n d w i t h m a r r i a g e a n d p r o m i s e s o f

    eve r l a s t i ng happ i nes s , no one has been ab l e t o make a goodnove l abou t a hap py mar r i age . M ar i t a l b l is s is du ll , no t pa s s i on -ate , a t l eas t to readers o f novels . Fiedler ' s sug ges t ion i s cons i s -t e n t w i t h b e h a v i o r a l d a t a i n d i c a ti n g t h a t f r e q u e n c y o f se x u a li n t e r cour se d i m i n i shes subs t an t i a l l y ove r t i me , even i n happymar r i ages ( e .g . , Mann , B e r kow i t z , S i dman , S t a r r , & Wes t ,1974).

    P a s s i o n a te l o ve m a y b e a v i a b l e c o n c e p t o f h u m a n f u lf il lm e n t ,bu t i t is no t on e t ha t i s conduc i ve t o p r o l on ged and s t ab le s a t is -fac t ion.

    OthersT w o s p e c u la t iv e c o m m e n t s a b o u t n e w c o n c e p t s o f f ul f il lm e n t

    dese r ve men t i on . D ur i n g t h i s pa s t cen t u r y , in t e r pe r sona l r ecog-n i t i on has come t o s eem l i ke a f u l f i l l i ng goa l ; a s pe r sona l i t yc o m e s t o t a k e p r e c e d e n c e o v e r a c h ie v e m e n t , e v e n t h e t a l k - s h o wce l eb r i t y so r t o f r ecogn i t i on bec om es des ir ed ( L asch , 1978) .A dd i t i ona l ly , f u l f il l men t f o r man y s eem s t o be a m a t t e r o f p l ea s -an t s ensa t i ons . T h i s m od em degr ee o f hedon i s t ic s e l f -i ndu l -g e n c e m a y b e a t t ri b u t a b l e t o t h e s t i m u l a t i o n o f a p p e ti te st h r o ugh adve r t i s ing ( Po t te r , 1954) and t he dec l i ne o f t he capac -i t y f o r se l f -den i a l ow i ng t o i ndu l gen t pa r en t i ng ( Whee l i s, 1958) .

    ConclusionT h e c u r r e n t p r o b l e m a t i c n a t u r e o f p o t e n ti a l a n d f u l f il lm e n t

    s e e m s t o h a v e t a k e n s h a p e a r o u n d t h e s t a r t o f th e 1 9 th c e n t u ry .T h e t h r e e p r o b l e m s m e n t i o n e d a t t h e b e g i n n i n g o f t h is s e c ti o n( conce p t s o f fu l f il l men t , m e t hod s o f fu l f i ll men t , and t o l e r ancef o r n o n f u lf i ll m e n t ) b e c a m e a c u t e t h e n . O n c e t h e g u i d i n g c o n -c e p t s o f C h r is t ia n s a l v a ti o n a n d h e a v e n l o st t h e ir d o m i n a n t a p -p e a l, t h e y w e r e r e p l a c e d b y s e c u l a r c o n c e p t s o f h u m a n p o t e n t ia land f u l f i l l men t . Se l f - ac t ua l i za t i on i s an appea l i ng bu t vaguet e r m , r e f l ect i ng soc i e t y ' s de s i r e f o r (bu t l a ck o f ) su ch conc ep t s .L o v e a n d c r e a ti v e w o r k s e e m t h e b e s t r e c o g n i z e d i m a g e s o f s ec -u l a r f u l f i ll men t , bu t t he o ppo r t un i t i e s f o r t he l a t t e r have beend e g r a d e d b y t h e c h a n g e d n a t u r e o f w o r k .

    T h e r e j e ct i o n o f t h e m e d i e v a l C h r i s ti a n n o t i o n o f h u m a n f u l-f i ll men t a l so en t a i l ed t ha t m or a l , v i r t uo us beha v i o r ceased t o bec o n s i d e r e d a s t h e m e a n s o f a c h i e v in g f u l fi ll m e n t, a s M a c I n t y r e( 198 l ) ha s desc r i bed . S i nce t hen , t he p r ob l em o f f ind i ng meth-ods of r each i ng f u l f i l lmen t ha s no t b een so l ved . L ove , f o r t u -na t e ly , s eems t o occ ur spon t aneous l y , so t ech n i que s o f fa l li ng inl o ve a r e n o t n e e d e d , a l t h o u g h s o m e m i g h t w e l c o m e t e c h n i q u e sf o r p r o l ong i ng t he pas s ion . O t he r t ha n t ha t , t he r e i s subs t an t i a lunce r t a i n t y . T he w r i t i ngs abou t s e l f - ac t ua l i za t i on c i t ed aboveseem t o have even l es s t o s ay abo u t t he t echn i qu es o f s e lf - ac tua l -i za t i on t han abo u t i t s cha r ac te r i s ti c s .

    T h e h u m a n w i ll in g n e s s t o t o le r a te t h e f r u s t r a t i o n a n d d i s a p -po i n t me n t o f f e lt nonf u l f i l lmen t a l so d i mi n i shed w i t h t he r e jec -t i on o f the C hr i s t i an i mage o f s a l va t i on a s l i f e 's f u l fi l lmen t , f o rc i ti z e n s o f t h e R o m a n t i c e r a b e g a n t o d e m a n d s a ti s fa c t io n s i nt h i s l if e i n s t ead o f t he nex t . ( I t is en t i r e ly p l aus i b l e t ha t pe r sonscan f ee l un f u l f i l l ed and f r us t r a t ed w i t hou t hav i ng a c l ea r con-cep t o f w h a t f u l f i l lmen t w ou l d be . ) A s a r e su lt , peop l e bega n t ov i ew soc i e t y a s oppr e s s ive and r ep r e ss i ve . T h i s conf l i c t be t w eent he i nd i v i dua l and soc i e t y is a ma j o r t hem e o f t he nex t s ec t i onof th i s ar t i c le .

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    7/14

    SELFHOOD IN HISTORY 169R e l a t i o n B e t w e e n I n d i v i d u a l a n d S o c i e t y

    T h e m e d i e v a l p e r so n ' s r e la t io n t o t h e c o m m u n i t y w a s s t a bl eand unpr ob l ema t i c . When t he a t t i t udes t ha t sus t a i ned t h i s s t a -b i l i t y w e r e u n d e r m i n e d a n d a b a n d o n e d , p e o p l e b e g a n t o f e e lt ha t soc i e t y a s a w ho l e w as i nd i f f e r en t o r even hos t i l e t o t hei nd i v i dua l ' s be s t i n te r e s ts . T h i s conf l i c t be t w een i nd i v i dua l an dsoc i e t y has been v i ew ed i n s eve r al d i f fe r en t w ays du r i n g t he pas tt w o cen t u r i e s .

    Review of ResearchT he med i eva l men t a l i t y be l i eved t he soc i a l h i e r a r chy t o be

    f i xed and l eg i t i ma t e . N i sbe t ( 1973) r eco r ded t ha t med i eva l so -c i a l ph i l osoph y w as w ho l l y dom i na t e d b y S t. A u gus t i ne ' s exp l a -na t i on t ha t G od had a s s i gned each pe r son a f i xed p l ace i n t hec o m m u n i t y . T h e c o m m u n i t y w a s c o n s id e re d t o b e a s m u c h as t ab le un i t y a s any l i v i ng o r gan i sm i s. N o pe r son shou l d t he r e -f o r e des i r e t o change h i s o r he r s ta t i on , any mo r e t han a f i nge rs h o u l d w i s h t o b e t h e b o d y ' s e y e (t o u s e A u g u s t in e ' s f a m o u ss im i le ) . E a c h l i n k i n t h e " g r e a t c h a i n o f b e i n g " ( a c o m m o nphr ase ) w as i mpor t an t . N i sbe t ( 1973) unde r sco r ed t he pe r -ce i ved s tab i l it y o f t he sys t em o f soc i a l r e l a ti onsh i ps by o bse r v -i n g t h a t r e v o l u t io n f o r th e p u r p o s e o f p o l it ic a l r e f o r m w a s u n -know n i n Wes t e r n h i s t o r y un t i l t he 18 t h cen t u r y ( a l so s eeB ur ke , 1978 , pp . 154- 155) .

    E ach pe r son w as equa t ed w i t h h i s o r he r p l ace i n t he soc i a lh i e r a r chy ( see ea r li e r d i s cus s i on o f M ac l n t y r e , 1981) . T he s amesen t i men t i s expre s sed by t he p r i mi t i ve an d ea r l y c i v i li z ed equa -t i on o f dea t h w i t h ex il e: T he pe r son ' s ve r y be i ng i s un t h i nkab l eapa r t f r om t he ac t ua l con t ex t o f soc i a l r o l e s a s s i gned t o t ha tpe r son by G od , soc i et y , and f ami ly . T he l ack o f any subs t an t i a lsense of an inn er se l f (e .g . , Tr il ling, 1971) was a fur th er reas onw hy med i eva l s equa t ed t he pe r son w i t h t he pub l i c , v i s i b l e ac -t i ons and a spec ts .

    T h e e n d o f t h e M i d d l e A g e s w a s m a r k e d b y i n c r e a s in g s o c i a lmob i l i t y , e spec i a ll y i n r ega r d t o t he g r ow t h o f a m i dd l e c l a ss .T he soc i a l h i e r a r chy ceased t o be f i xed . T he i n s t ab i l i t y i n -c r e a s ed t h r o u g h o u t t h e e ar l y m o d e r n p e r i o d . C o m m o n e r s e v e nbegan t o ga i n acces s t o t he a r i s t oc r acy , t h r ough i n t e r mar r i age ,a l t hough t he a r i s t oc r a t s r e s i s t ed and r e sen t ed such p r e t ens i ons( Senne t t , 1974 ; S t one , 1977) . I t i s no t su r p r i s i ng t ha t conc ep-t i ons o f i nd i v i dua l i ty beca me a r t i cu l a t e a nd i n f l uen t i a l du r i ngt he ea r l y mode r n pe r i od . Sepa r a t i ng t he pe r son f r om t he f i xedp l ace i n the soc i a l ne t w o r k r equ i r e s on e t o t h i nk o f t he pe r sona s t h e b a s i c u n i t , n o t t h e c o m m u n i t y ( c f . M a c I n t y r e , 1 9 8 1 ;W ei n t r aub , 1978 ; a l so A r en d t ' s , 1951 , d i s cus s i on o f H obb es ) .T he i nd i v i dua l ' s i n t e r e s ts co u l d be i n conf l i c t w i t h t hose o f soc i -e t y , some t h i ng t ha t t he med i eva l m i nd w ou l d have den i ed i npr inciple .

    T h e r u p t u r e b e t w e e n t h e i n d iv i d u a l a n d s o c i e t y w a s m o r et h a n a c o n c e p t u a l a d v a n c e o f t h e p h i lo s o p h e rs . I t s e e m s t o h a v ehad a s t r ong behav i o r a l co r r e l a t e i n t he deve l op men t o f p r i vacy .N o w a d a y s , w e t e n d t o r e g a r d p r iv a c y a s a f u n d a m e n t a l h u m a nr i g h t a n d a u n i v e r s a l h u m a n n e e d . T h e m e d i e v a l E u r o p e a n ,how eve r, ap pa r en t l y g o t a l ong w i t hou t p r i vacy ; indeed , i t mayneve r have occur r ed t o h i m o r he r t o w an t i t . A r i e s ( 1962) a s -s e r t ed t ha t " i n f ac t, un t i l t he end o f t he s even t een t h cen t u r y ,nob od y w as eve r l e ft a l one? ' A r i e s ( 1962) and S t one ( 1977) de -s c r i bed t he a r ch i t ec t u r a l i nnov a t i ons o f t he ea r l y mode r n e r a a s

    new l y conduc i ve t o p r i vacy . T he des i r e f o r and cu l t i va t i on o fp r i vacy r e f l ec ts an a t t i t ude t ha t t he r e i s some p a r t o f li fe t ha tdoes n o t be l ong t o p ub l i c soc i et y .

    T h e i n c r e a s i n g s e p a r a ti o n o f p u b l i c a n d p r i v a t e d o m a i n s o fe x p e r ie n c e w a s a s o r t o f u n e a s y t r u c e t h a t l a i d t h e f o u n d a t i o n sf o r a con cep t o f s e l f a s be i ng i n conf l i c t w i t h soc i e ty . Senne t t( 1 9 7 4 ) h a s a d v a n c e d t h e i m p o r t a n t b u t c o n t r o v er s ia l t he s is t h a t18 t h cen t u r y c i t i z ens va l ued pub l i c l i f e ( a s soc i a t ed w i t h t heh i ghe r va l ues o f c i v i li z a t ion and cu l t u r e ) mo r e h i gh l y t han p r i -va t e li fe ( a s soc i a ted w i t h n a t u r a l f unc t i ons ) , a l t hough t ha t va l ueh i e r a r ch y w as r eve rsed by t he end o f the 19 t h cen tu r y .

    T h e t r a n s i t io n t o t h e 1 9 th c e n t u r y w a s m a r k e d b y a s h a r p lyi nc r eased s ense o f conf l i c t be t w een i nd i v i dua l s and soc ie t y . In -d e e d , a m a i n t h e m e o f 1 9 th c e n t u r y l i te r a tu r e w a s t h a t o f t h eindivid ual versus socie ty (An derso n, 1971; P/ i t z , 1979; Sypher ,1962; Tr i l l ing, 1950). Th e increas in g asser t ion o f the individu ali s some t i mes a s soc i a t ed w i t h t he i nc i p i en t dec l i ne i n t he s enseof com m un i t y ( A nde r son , 1971 ) . B ehav i o r a ll y , t he i nd i v i dua l ' sr epud i a t i on o f ex i s t ing soc i e t y f oun d expr e s s i on i n the num er -ous r ebe l l i ons a i med a t po l i t ic a l r e f o r m ( N i sbe t, 1973) .

    A n i nd i v i dua l can on l y be i n conf l i c t w i t h soc i e t y a s a w ho l ei f i nd i v i dua l s a r e und e r s t oo d t o ex i s t apa r t f r om t he i r soc ia lpos i t i ons ( see p r ev i ous d i s cus s i on o f M ac l n t y r e , 1981 ; a l soW ei n t r aub , 1978) . T ha t i s one r ea son t he appe a r ance o f t he newc o n c e p t o f i n d i v id u a l i ty c o i n c i d e d w i t h r e c o g n i t i o n o f s u c hconf l i c t . I t mus t be emphas i zed t ha t t he t r ad i t i ona l sys t em o fsoc i a l r ank and h i e r a r chy , hav i ng a l r ead y l os t some o f it s st ab il -i ty , los t i t s perceived legi t imacy as wel l . That "a l l men are cre-a t ed equa l , " a no t i on l abe l ed a " s e lf - ev i den t t r u t h" i n t he r evo-l u t i o n a r y m a n i f e s to o f t h e A m e r i c a n c o l o n is t s (1 7 7 6 ), w o u l dhave been i nconce i vab l e t o t he med i eva l men t a l i t y i n t he s enset he co l on i s t s a s s e r t ed i t . T he med i eva l men t a l i t y t ook f o rg r an t ed t ha t t he a r i s t oc r a t w as a be t t e r pe r son t han t he peasan tand t h a t t he i neq ua l i t y w as l eg i t i ma t ed by d i v i ne w i ll .A s econd , r e l a t ed r ea son f o r t he i nc r eas i ng s ense o f conf li c tb e t w e e n i n d i v id u a l a n d s o c i e ty p r e s u m a b l y h a d t o d o w i t h t h esecu l a r i za t i on o f con cep t s o f f u l fi l lmen t . T he des i r e f o r f u lf il l-m en t dur in g thi s l ife , ins tead of in heaven ly af ter li fe , mu st havei n t ens i f i ed d i s con t en t a r i s i ng f r om f r us t r a t i on and nonf u l f i l l -m e n t d u r i n g l if e. B e g i n n i n g p e r h a p s w i t h R o u s s e a u a n d c o n t i n -u i n g t h r o u g h o u t t h e R o m a n t i c p e r i o d , th e f o r m s o f s o c ie t y w e r eb l am ed f o r pe r sona l non f u l f i ll men t . A nd e r son ( 1971) , f o r ex -a m p l e , s u m m a r i z e d a c e n tr a l t h e m e o f H a w t h o r n e ' s n o v e l s a sf ol low s : "T h e soc i a l cond i t i ons deny m en t he ch ance t o be f u l l ym e n a n d w o m e n t h e c h a n c e t o b e f u ll y w o m e n " ( p . 85 ). I n d e e d ,p r o m o t i n g t h e i n d i v i d u al a g a i n s t t h e o p p r e ss i ve e n c r o a c h m e n t so f s o c ie t y w a s a m a j o r c o n c e r n o f w r it e rs a n d t h i n k e rs t h r o u g h -ou t t he 19 t h cen t u r y . P i i t z ( 1979) l i s t ed t he "key concep t s " o fA m er i can w r i t e rs o f t he p r ev i ous cen t u r y a s " s e lf - r e li ance , non -conf o r mi t y , t he r e j ec t i on o f t he pas t, t he den i a l o f t he i mpe r -a t iv e s o f s o c i e t y . . , r a d i c al i n d i v i d u a l is m " ( p . 33 ).

    T h e r e s p o n s e t o t h e p e r c e p t i o n o f c h r o n i c c o n f l ic t b e tw e e ni nd i v i dua l and soc i e t y evo l ved t h r ough t w o ove r l app i ng s t agesdur i ng t he 19 t h cen t u r y . I n t he f i r s t , t he R omant i c he r o s t r ug -g l ed w i t h soc i e t y to w i n f r eed om t o r eac h f u l f i ll men t . A pp a r -ently , l ife me an t l i fe in socie ty; there was no a l ternat ive (cf. An-de r son , 1971) . T h e i nd i v i du a l ' s so l e hope l ay in t he pos s i b i li t yo f i mp r ov i n g o r t r ans f o r m i ng soc i a l cond i t i ons . ( B e l i e f i n t hepos s i b i li t y o f ach i ev i ng f u l f i ll men t i n an i mp r ove d soc i e t y w ase v i d e n t i n t h e n u m e r o u s u t o p i a n e x p e r i m e n t s a n d w r i t i n g s o f

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    8/14

    170 R O Y E B A U ME I ST E Rt h e 1 9 th c e n tu r y . ) W h e n t h e s t r u gg l e b e c a m e t o o m u c h , t h e R o -man t i c he r o s i mpl y d i ed , a s i n t he ce l eb r a t ed su i c i de o fG o e t he ' s y oun g Wert he r.

    T o w a r d m i d c e n t u r y , t r a n s c e n d e n ta l i sm e m e r g e d a s a d o m i -nan t t he me i n A me r i can l e tt er s. A s t he i r name i mpl i e s , t he t r an -scenden t a li s ts sough t t he i r f u l f il l men t n o t i n ev e r yday soc i a l l if eb u t i n p r iv a t e e x p e ri e n c e t h a t c a r r i e d t h e m b e y o n d t h e o p p r e s -s iv e a n d m u n d a n e c o n d i t io n s o f s o ci et y . T h e y k e p t t h e R o m a n -t i c va l ues o f pe r sona l v i r t ue , r e sour ce f u l nes s , an d des i r e f o rf r eedom, b u t t hey ad ded a w i l li ngnes s t o go it a l one . I f E m er sonw a s th e m o v e m e n t ' s m o s t r e s p e c t ed a n d a r t ic u l a t e t h i n k e r a n dW h i t m a n i ts m o s t e x t r e m e e m b o d i m e n t , T h o r e a u f u lf il le d it sa r che t ypa l i dea l mo s t v i v id ly . B y cu l t i va t i ng h i s c r ea t i v i t y andunde r s t and i ng w hi l e l i v i ng a l one i n t he w oods , he s eemed t op r ove t ha t t he w ay t o pe r sona l f u l f il l men t l ed aw ay f r om l if e i nsociety.

    T r a n s c e n d e n ta l is m d i d n o t i n d u c e l a rg e n u m b e r s o f p eo p l et o e schew soc i a l l if e a l toge t he r. A s t he e r a ' s a cc l a i m o f E m er sonsuggest s, peo p l e w an t ed ( o r w er e con t en t w i t h ) on l y l i m i t ed andoccas i ona l tr anscendence . Soc i e t y w as r ega r ded a s so r t o f a nec -e s sa r y evi l. E m er son ' s so l u t i on w as t o l ive i n soc i e t y bu t s eekful f i l lment in pr ivate , personal l i fe . In a sense , th i s view re-ga r ded soc i e t y a s t o l e r ab l e bu t no t s a t i s f y i ng . I t con t r a s t ssha r p l y w i t h t he v i ew i n ea r l y 20 t h cen t u r y l i t e r a t u r e , w h i cha t t acked soc i e t y a s no t ju s t unsa t i s f y i ng bu t i n t o l e r ab l e a s w e ll .

    O t he r h i s t o ri ca l ev i dence conf i r ms t he pe r c ep t i on o f conf li c tbe t w een i nd i v i dua l an d soc i e t y and t he r e t r ea t f r o m p ub l i c l if e.B y t he V i c t o r i an e r a , p r i va t e l if e ( home an d f am i l y ) beca me t hep r e e m i n e n t v a l u e a n d p r i z e d r e f u ge , a h a v e n a m i d s t t h e t h r e a t-en i ng unce r t a i n t i e s o f pub l i c l if e (Fass , 1977 ; H o ugh t on , 1957 ;D . W. H ow e , 1976 ; Senne t t , 1974) . T he f a mi l y ' s age -o l d p r i-m a r y f u n c t i o n a s a n e c o n o m i c u n i t f o r m a n a g i n g t h e b u s i n e sso f su r v iva l w as d i mi n i sh ed by u r b an i ndus t r i a l l if e and w as r e -p l a c e d b y t h e f u n c t i o n o f p r o v i d i n g in t i m a t e , e m o t i o n a l r e -l a t i ons among t he f ami l y member s ( B ur ges s & L ocke , 1945 ;Fas s , 1977) . Senne t t ( 1974) a r gued t ha t t he a l mos t ax i oma t i cemp has i s on i n t i ma t e r e l a t i onsh i ps a s neces sa r y f o r p sycho l og i -cal heal th (e .g . , Er ikson, 1950; Sul l ivan, 1953) i s a hi s tor ica l lyr e l a ti ve p r od uc t o f t he dec l i n i ng pa r t i c i pa t i on i n pub l i c l if e.

    T he E mer son i an i dea t ha t f u l f i l l men t cou l d be ob t a i ned i npr ivate l i fe , in peaceful coexis tence wi th publ ic socie ty , seemsi n t r i n s i ca l l y p l aus i b l e , bu t i t van i shed ab r up t l y f r om se r i ousw r i t i ng a t t he s t a r t o f t he 20 t h cen t u r y . A l i ena t i on be cam e t hem ajo r them e in l i t era ture (Klein , 1964; Pi i t z , 1979) . Speci f icmean i ngs o f a l i ena t i on v a r y am on g d i f f e ren t t heo r i s t s (s ee , e s -pecia l ly , S eem an, 1959), bu t i ts genera l sense in ear ly 20th cen -t u r y l i te r a tu r e m a y p e r h a p s b e e x p r e ss e d a s a m i x t u r e o f p o w e r -lessness ( fut i l i ty) , meaninglessness (empt iness) , and nonful -f i l lment ( f rus t ra t ion) .

    I f one a s sum es t ha t t he l i t e r a r y emphas i s on a l i ena t i on r e -f l ec t ed a m a j o r a spec t o f t he co n t em po r a r y co l l ec t ive psyche , itmus t be i n f e r r ed t ha t t he ea rl y 20 t h cen t u r y c i t i z ens s aw t hem-sel ves a s u t t e r ly i n t he g r i p o f soc i a l f o r ces and pow er s t ha t w e r ei nd i f f e r en t t o t hem pe r sona l l y . T h i s s eems en t i r e l y p l aus i b l ef r om a soc i o l og i ca l s t andpo i n t . T he t r ans i t i on t o i ndus t r i a l , u r -ban l if e f o r t he m a j o r i t y o f pe r sons en t a i l ed s e r i ous econ om i ci n t e r dependence . Se l f -su f fi c iency w as obso l e t e , and ec ono mi cdepr es s i ons (such a s occur r ed i n t he 1890s and 1930s ) t h r ea t -ened pe r sona l su r v i va l . T he i nd i v i dua l ' s u t t e r dependency ons o c ie t y w a s n o t y e t t e m p e r e d b y g o v e r n m e n t s o c ia l p r o g r a m s

    such a s w e l f ar e and soc i a l s ecu r i t y no r by co r por a t e gu a r an t eeso f o b s e c u r i ty a n d r e t i r e m e n t p e n s i o n s.

    I t appea r s t ha t soc i e t y w as s ti ll pe r ce i ved a s a ba r r i e r t o l iv i ngmea n i ngf u l an d f u l f il led l ive s, bu t t he chan ce t o e scape i n t o p r i -va t e f u lf i ll men t s apa r t f r om so c i e t y had som ehow bee n l os t. I nt e r ms o f the p r e sen t d i s cus s i on o f the i nd i v i dua l ' s r e l a t ion t osoc i et y , t he ba l anc e o f pow er i n t ha t conf l i c t s eems t o havesh i f t ed heav i l y i n soc i e t y ' s f avor a t t he s t a r t o f th i s cen t u r y .

    T w o o t he r f ea t u r e s o f ea rl y 20 t h cen t u r y w r i t ing a r e cons i s -ten t wi th thi s analys i s . Fi rs t, i f the indiv idual w as a t socie ty ' smer cy , t hen t he s e l f - r e spec t o f t he i nd i v i dua l w ou l d p r e su ma b l ysu ff er . T h i s s eem s t o have occu r r ed . W her eas t he ( s ecu l a r ) su -p r eme be i ng o f 19 t h cen t u r y l i t e r a t u r e w as " t he i mper i a l s e l f "( A nde r son , 1971) , 20 t h cen t u r y w r i t e r s ceased t o r ega r d t he s e lfa s hav i ng "u l t i m a t e va l ue and sub s t ance" ( Syphe r, 1962). P i i t z( 1979) and S yphe r quo t ed a l i ne f r om M us i l ' s nove l a s rep r e sen -t a ti ve o f the n ew a t t i t ude t ow ar d s e l f hood : "T he cen t e r o f g rav -i t y no l onge r li es i n t he i nd i v i dua l bu t i n t he r e l a t ions be t w eent h i n gs" T hu s , soc i e t y ho l ds t he pow er , and t he i nd i v i dua l i s r e -d u c e d t o a " m e r e f u n c t i o n a r y " ( S y p he r , 1 96 2) . L a n g b a u m( 1979) gave a s i m i l a r ly b l eak acc ou n t o f t he s t a t us o f t he s e l f i n20 t h cen t u r y l i t e r a t u r e , a l t ho ugh he s aw ea r l y s igns o f t he l o s so f s e lf a l r e a d y i n t h e V i c t o r ia n p o e t r y o f M a t t h e w A r n o l d . S y -phe r ' s t he s i s o f t he deva l ua t i on o f s e l f hood a l so meshes w i t hA l t i c k ' s (1 9 6 5 ) d i s cu s s i o n o f t h e n e w l y u n s y m p a t h e t i c a n d e v e ni conoc l a s t i c t rends i n b i og r aph i ca l w r i t i ng ea r l y i n the 20 t h ce n -t u r y .

    Second , i f pe r sons f ee l t hemse l ves a s so c i e t y ' s r a t he r he l p l e s sv i c t i ms , t he i r hos t i l it y t ow ar d soc i e t y shou l d i nc r ease . I nd eed ,20 t h cen t u r y w r i te r s ac t i ve ly and b i t t e rl y ch r on i c l ed t he f au l tsand i nadequ ac i e s o f ex i s ti ng soc ie t y . T he ze s t t o expose and a t -t ack soc i a l ev i ls becam e an end i n i ts el f, exempl i f i ed by muck-raking i n j ou r na l i sm and i n nove l s such a s S i nc l a i r ' s The Jun-gle. T hi s hos t i l i t y t ow ar d soc i e t y con t r a s t s w i t h t he appa r en tpas s i v i ty o f t he 19 t h cen t u r y au t hor s on soc i a l i ssues ( A nde r son ,1971 ; Tri l l ing, 1971).

    T h e d e g r e e to w h i c h t h e m o d e r n i n d iv i d u a l i s i n e l u c ta b l y i m -mer sed i n soc i e t y has p r o m pt e d som e w r i t e rs t o sugges t t ha t t hec h a n c e s o f a c h ie v i n g t r u e i n d i v id u a l i ty a r e d i m i n i s h i n g , t h u sr eve r s ing t he cen t u r i e s - l ong tr end t ow a r d i nc r eased i nd i v i dua l -i ty ( A d o r n o , 1 9 5 1 ; F r o m m , 1 9 4 1 / 1 9 6 9 ; H a b e r m a s , 1 9 7 3 / 1 9 7 5 ;L a n d m a n n , 1 97 1 ). A s i m i l a r p o i n t m a d e b y o t h e r o b s er v e rs ist h a t p e r s o n a l i ty t y p e s h a v e i n c r ea s i n g ly e m p h a s i z e d c o n f o r m -i ng t o t he e xpec t a t i ons o f o t he r s i n s t ead o f f o l low i ng s tr i c tl yinterna l mot iv at ion s (e .g . , Fr ieden berg, 1959; May, 1953;R i e sm an , 1950 ; Whee l i s , 1958). Su ch deve l opme n t s can be a t -t r i b u t e d t o a v a r i e ty o f fa c to r s , i n c l u d in g e c o n o m i c i n t e rd e -p e n d e n c e , m a s s - p r o d u c e d g o o d s , t h e i n fl u e n c e o f n e w s m e d i aand expe r t s w h o te l l pe r sons w ha t t o t h i nk ( e .g ., F r o mm , 19411 9 6 9 ; L a n d m a n n , 1 97 1 ), t h e m a n i p u l a t i o n o f d es i re b y a d v e r -t i s ing (e .g . , Henry, 1963; Pot ter , 1954) , and the bureaucrat iza-t i on o f w o r k t ha t r equ i r e s soc i a l sk il ls an d co mp a t i b i l i t y w i t ho t he r s ( e .g . , K e t t , 1977 ; W hyt e , 1956).

    A f t e r t he Second Wor l d War , t he postmodern A mer i can f i c -t i o n m o v e d a w a y f r o m t h e s t a n c e o f p u r e r a g e a n d r e b e l li o n .A l i ena t i on w as st il l a t heme , bu t i t w as no l onge r t he m a i n po i n t .Pos t mo de r n f i c ti on show ed a new i n t e re s t i n w ha t K l e i n ( 1964)calls accommodation, w h i c h t o o k t h e f o r m o f a lt e r n a ti o n b e -t w een ad j us t i ng o nese l f t o f it i n t o soc i e t y and a t t emp t i ng t o a s -s e r t onese l f . A ccommoda t i on r ep r e sen t ed a p r e f e r ence f o r l i f e

  • 8/3/2019 Baumeister Self as Problem

    9/14

    S E L F H O O Dw i t h c o m p r o m i s e o v e r p e r p e t u a l a n d f u t il e r e b e ll i o n . O f c o u r s e ,t h e r e w e r e m i s g iv i n gs ; t o s o m e , a c c o m m o d a t i o n a s p r a c t i c e d i nt h e s u b u r b s l o o k e d a l o t l i k e m e r e s u r v i v a l b y c a m o u f l a g e ( S y -p h e r , 19 6 2) . I t d e s e r v e s m e n t i o n t h a t t h e a c c o m m o d a t i o n m o v e -m e n t K l e i n d e s c r i b e s e n t a i l e d a p a r t i a l r e t u r n t o a c c e p t i n g s o c i-e t y a s i t i s . I . H o w e ( 1 9 5 9 / 1 9 6 9 ) a n d R o t h ( 1 9 6 1 / 1 9 6 9 ) s u g -g e s t e d t h a t p o s t m o d e r n w r i t e r s d o w n p l a y e d s o c i a l c r i t i c i s mb e c a u s e t h e y f o u n d i t d i t ~ c u l t e n o u g h j u s t t o u n d e r s t a n d t h en e w m a s s s o c i e ty a n d t o p o r t r a y m o d e r n l if e c r e d ib l y .

    I n t h e l i t e r a t u r e o f t h e 1 9 6 0 s, a c c o r d i n g t o P i i t z ( 1 9 7 9 ) , t h e" s t r u g g le f o r i d e n t i t y " t o o k t h e f o r m of myth-making. I n m y t h -m a k i n g , t h e p r o t a g o n i s t p r o j e c t s s e lf - m a d e s c h e m e s o f c o h e r -e n c e o n t o t h e w o r l d . M y t h - m a k i n g i s r e m i n i s c e n t o f t r a n s c e n -d e n t a l i s m i n s e v e r a l w a y s , m o s t n o t a b l y t h e p a s s i v e a c c e p t a n c eo f s o c i e t y ' s g e n e r a l n a t u r e a s g iv e n a n d t h e r e l i a n c e o n i n t e r n a lr e s o u r c e s t o p r o v i d e l if e w i t h c o h e r e n c e ( m e a n i n g ) a n d f u l fi l l-m e n t .

    T h u s , t h e r e c e n t t r e n d s s u g g e s t t h a t t h e i n d i v i d u a l h a s a c -c e p t e d t h e s t a te o f b e in g i m m e r s e d i n a n d d e p e n d e n t o n s o c i e tya n d i s s t r u g g l i n g t o f i n d m e a n i n g a n d f u l f i l l m e n t w i t h i n t h o s el i m i t a t i o n s .

    Conclus ionT h e r e l a ti o n o f t h e m e d i e v a l p e r s o n t o h i s o r h e r s o c i et y w a s

    u n p r o b l e m a t i c o w i n g t o t w o f u n d a m e n t a l , r e l a t e d a t ti t u d e s .T h e f i rs t w a s t h e d e n i a l t h a t t h e p e r s o n e x i s t e d a p a r t f r o m h i so r h e r p o s i t i o n i n s o c i e ty . T h e s e c o n d w a s f a i t h t h a t i f o n e f u l -f i l le d o n e ' s a l l o t t e d r o l e i n s o c i e t y , o n e ' s l i fe w o u l d h a v e m e a n -i n g , h i g h e r v a l u e , a n d f u l f i ll m e n t , b e c a u s e t h e s o c i a l o r d e r h a di t s d e s i g n (a n d p u r p o s e ) a n d l e g i t im a c y f r o m G o d .

    T h e r e l a t i o n o f t h e s e l f t o s o c i e t y b e c a m e a p r o b l e m w h e nt h e s e t w o b a s i c a t t i t u d e s w e r e d e s t r o y e d . T h e f i rs t a t t i t u d e w a su n d e r m i n e d b y t h e r i s e i n s o c ia l m o b i li t y , w h i c h d e t a c h e d t h ei n d i v i d u a l fr o m t h e s o c i a l s t a t io n t o w h i c h h e o r s h e w a s b o r n ,a n d b y t h e g r o w t h o f in t e r n al i ty . (T h e r e m a y h a v e b e e n a d d i -t i o n a l c a u s e s. ) T h e s e c o n d a t t it u d e w a s u n d e r m i n e d a s h u m a n -i t y c e a s e d t o l i v e b y C h r i s t i a n f a i t h a n d i m a g e r y , b e c a u s e t h ed i v i n e l e g i ti m a c y o f th e s o c i al o r d e r w a s r e p u d i a t e d , a n d b e -c a u s e t h e r e w a s n o l o n g e r a n y b a s i s f o r h a v i n g f a i t h t h a t f u l fi l l-m e n t a n d r e w a r d w o u l d b e t h e i n e v i t a b l e r e su l t o f d o in g w h a ts o c i e ty b id . T h e s e c o n d a t t i tu d e w a s a l s o u n d e r m i n e d b y t h ef a c t t h a t s o c i e t y g r a d u a l l y c e a s e d g iv i n g e a c h p e r s o n a n u n -e q u i v o c a l m e s s a g e a b o u t h o w t o l i v e a n d w h a t t o d o ; l i b e r a l r e -f o r m s p r e s e n t e d p e r s o n s w i t h a n i n c r e a s in g a r r a y o f o p t i o n s.T h e c o l l a p se o f th e s e t w o a t t i tu d e s , a n d t h e r e s u l t a n t p r o b l e m -a t i c n a t u r e o f t h e r e l a t i o n b e t w e e n i n d i v i d u a l a n d s o c i e ty , w e r ef u r t h e r a g g r a v a t e d b y t h e i n c r e a s i n g d e m a n d f o r f u l f il l m e n t int h i s l if e in s t e a d o f i n t h e n e x t , b e c a u s e s o c i e t y w a s b l a m e d f o rt h e w i d e s p r e a d f e e l in g s o f n o n f u l f i l l m e n t .

    T h e p r o b l e m o f t h e i n d i v i d u a l ' s r e l a t io n t o s o c i e ty t h e ne v o l v e d t h r o u g h f o u r s t a g es . B e l i e v in g t h a t s o c i e t y p r e v e n t e dt h e m f r o m r e a c h i n g f u l f i l l m e n t , in


Recommended