+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious...

Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious...

Date post: 25-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: derek-lee
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
30
Baylor Law School Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, A Professional Corporation Attorneys and Counselors City Center Tower II 301 Commerce Street, Suite 1500 Fort Worth, Texas 76102 (817) 877-1088 (817) 877-1636 (facsimile) E-mail: [email protected] ©Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.
Transcript
Page 1: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Baylor Law SchoolBaylor Law SchoolNonprofit OrganizationsNonprofit Organizations

Spring 2005 CourseSpring 2005 CourseChurches and Other Religious

OrganizationsPrepared By:

Darren B. MooreBourland, Wall & Wenzel,

A Professional Corporation

Attorneys and Counselors

City Center Tower II

301 Commerce Street, Suite 1500

Fort Worth, Texas 76102

(817) 877-1088

(817) 877-1636 (facsimile)

E-mail: [email protected]

©Bourland, Wall & Wenzel, P.C.

Page 2: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Nonprofit Organizational Structure

• Nonprofit unincorporated association– Typically a default

• Nonprofit Corporation– Most common

• Charitable Trust (covered in T&E)– Oldest form (Statute of Uses – 1601)

Page 3: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

§ 501(c)(3) Elements

1. Proper organizational structure

2. Organized exclusively for charitable purposes

3. Operated exclusively for charitable purposes

4. No part of net earnings inures to benefit of private individual

5. Not an action organization

6. <<case law>> - not violative of public policy

Page 4: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Public Charity

• Traditional charities (hospitals, churches, etc.)

• Publicly supported (aka gross receipts) charities (receive substantial amount of support from public or governmental agencies)

• Supporting Organizations (take status from supported organization)

Page 5: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Obtaining Tax-Exempt Status

• Recognition of tax-exempt status occurs when IRS agrees with the organization that it is eligible for tax-exempt status

• For charitable organizations, absent an exception, must file Form 1023 to achieve tax-exempt status

• Form 1023 also notifies the IRS if the organization is to be classified as a public charity or private foundation

• Exceptions to filing Form 1023: churches, associations of churches, integrated auxiliaries of churches, organizations (other than PFs) normally having annual gross receipts of not more than $5000

• Non-501(c)(3)’s apply with a different form and recognition of exempt status is not mandatory

Page 6: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

What is a Church?

• Term is found but not defined in IRC• “The term “church” includes a religious

order or a religious organization if such order or organization (a) is an integral part of a church, or (b) is engaged in carrying out the functions of a church . . . .” Treas. Reg. 1.511(a)(3)(ii) – “ministration of sacerdotal functions and the

conduct of religious worship” [also not defined]!!!

Page 7: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

IRS View of “Church”• Foundation for Human Understanding v. Commissioner

1. Distinct legal existence2. Recognized creed and form of worship3. Definite and distinct ecclesiastical government4. Formal code of doctrine and discipline5. Distinct religious history6. Membership not associated with another church7. Organization of ordained ministers8. Ordination after prescribed studies9. Literature of its own10. Established place or worship11. Regular congregations12. Regular worship services13. Sunday schools for religious instruction of the young14. Schools for the preparation of ministers

Page 8: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

What is an Integrated Auxiliary?

• Term found but not defined in IRC• Refers to a class of organizations related to a

church or association but not themselves a church or association

1. Fit definition of public charity2. Affiliated with a church or association3. Receive financial support primarily from internal

church sources as opposed to governmental sources

4. Exclusively religious purpose??? (Lutheran Social Services v. United States)

Page 9: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

What is a Convention or Association of Churches?

• Term found but not defined in IRC

• Added to statute at urging of Baptist leaders (congregational autonomous churches having loose associations)

• Term used as a way to refer to the organizational structure of some congregational churches

Page 10: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Nonprofit Unincorporated Associations

Unincorporated association, other than one created by a trust, consisting of three or more members joined by mutual consent for a common, nonprofit purpose

Governed by the Texas Uniform Unincorporated Nonprofit Association Act (since 1995) (1396-70.01)

Separate legal entity

Formation not governed by statute (usually have Constitution, Articles of Association, or Bylaws)

Powers: Promote aims and purposes and advance members’ interests by all legitimate and legal means (not necessarily charitable, e.g. trade association, unions)

Page 11: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Nonprofit Unincorporated Associations

Rights

• Sue or be sued

• Sue or be sued by a member

• Acquire, hold, encumber, transfer real or personal property without the need for trustees

• Be a beneficiary of a trust, contract, will, life insurance

• Can apply for 501(c)(3) status

• Can apply for property tax exemption

Page 12: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Nonprofit Corporations

PRO’s Well-established rules Well-established case-

law Internally flexible Extensive powers as an

entity

CON’s Cost to set up & run Rules to follow Giving up religious Giving up religious

freedom???freedom??? Even where funded

entirely by a single individual, must have at least three directors (IRS will request non-related)

Subject to Texas franchise tax unless granted exemption

Page 13: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Judicial Intervention into Private Association Affairs

• Traditionally not disposed to interfere with internal management of voluntary association

• Private association has the right to make and enforce its own rules (generally)

• Rationale: by becoming a member, you have subjected yourself to the organization’s power

• Constitutional Issues

Page 14: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Judicial Intervention into Church Disputes

• Constitutional implications of religious freedom restrict intervention even more severely than other voluntary associations

• Civil courts lack jurisdiction to resolve any dispute where resolution would necessitate inquiry into ecclesiastical doctrine or polity

• Marginal civil review available in certain circumstances

Page 15: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Federal Cases on Judicial Intervention

• Watson v. Jones (1871)

• Presbyterian Church of America v. Hull Presbyterian Church (1969)

• Milivojevich (1976)

• Jones v. Wolf (1979)

Page 16: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

State Cases on Judicial Intervention

• Dean v. Alford (FW 1999)

• Patterson v. SWBTS (FW 1993)

• Hill v. Sargent (Dallas 1981)

• Masjid Al-Ihsaan, Inc. v. Ouda (Ga. Ct. App.)

• Hines v. Turley (Ill. App. Ct.)

Page 17: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Marginal Civil Court Review

• Civil, contract, property rights involved• Body making decision lacked authority• Church failed to comply with own

practices/governing documents• Fraud/Collusion (for secular purposes)• Interpretation of contested terminology in

governing documents• Compulsory deference (particularly with property

disputes)– Still must decide based only on neutral principles

of law

Page 18: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Diversion from Charitable Purpose

• Holiman v. Dovers (Ark. 1963)

• Q. on page 528

• Can majority take property and devote to a different faith?

Page 19: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Tax Issues Affecting Churches

• Not required to apply for recognition of exemption but may and recognition may be revoked

• Must maintain status as 501(c)(3)

• Special Rules related to employment tax

• Special rules related to audits (applies only to churches . . . Not integrated auxiliaries or associations)

Page 20: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Failing the Operational Test

1. Substantial commercial activities (unless related to exempt purpose – limits?)

2. Private Benefit

3. Private Inurement

4. Action organization

5. Antithetical to public policy

Page 21: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Private Benefit

• Implicit in requirement that the organization must be operated for charitable (public) purposes

• Benefits cannot be limited to a group of persons (results in private rather than public benefit)

• What private interests are of concern?• Are insubstantial (incidental) private benefit

acceptable?• American Campaign Academy v. Comm’r

Page 22: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Private Inurement

• Subset of private benefit – If an organization allows its assets to inure to

an insider, it violates not only the private inurement prohibition but also operates to benefit a private interest

• Private inurement can result in revocation of tax-exempt status – Can also result in intermediate sanctions as

excess benefit transactions

Page 23: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Excess Benefit Transactions

§ 4958(c)(1): Any transaction in which an economic benefit is provided by an applicable tax-exempt organization directly or indirectly to or for the use of any DQP if the value of the economic benefit provided exceeds the value of the consideration (including the performance of services) received for providing such benefit.

Page 24: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Excess Benefit Transaction Consequences

• Two tier excise tax on DQP

1. First tier tax of 25% of the excess benefit- can be abated under certain circumstances

2. If not corrected in a timely manner, second-tier tax of 200% of the excess benefit

• Organization manager who knowingly participates pays a tax of 10% of the excess benefit not to exceed $10,000 <can be subject to both if the organization manager receives the excess benefit>

Page 25: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Action Organization

1. No substantial part of the activities may be carrying on propaganda, or otherwise attempting to influence legislation.

2. Organization cannot participate in, or otherwise intervene in any political campaign on behalf of or in opposition to a candidate for public office.

Page 26: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

The Church Audit Procedures ActSection 7611 IRC

1. Church tax inquiries- Reasonable belief on basis of written evidence

church is not exempt- IRS sends church written inquiry notice with specific

concerns outlined and general subject matter of inquiry

2. Church tax examinations- Inquiry met- Notice sent at least 15 days after inquiry and at

least 15 days before inspection/examination- Must tell church what documents will be reviewed

and show church what documents have been reviewed

Page 27: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

The Church Audit Procedures Act

3. Church Records – may be examined only to the extent necessary to determine liability for and amount of any income, employment or excise tax

4. Religious activities – may be examined only to the extent necessary to determine whether an organization claiming to be a church is in fact a church

5. Deadline for completion – inquiry (90 days unless followed by examination); examinations (two years after examination notice sent – subject to abatements)

Page 28: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Authority of AG as to Charitable Organizations

• Common Law Authority

• Constitutional Authority

• Statutory Authority

Page 29: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Other Tax Issues

• UBTI (Class # 9)• Employment taxes

– Generally churches required to withhold, report and pay over-withheld income and FICA taxes for employees

– Exceptions: (1) wages paid for services performed by a duly ordained, commissioned, or licensed minister of a church in the exercise of his or her ministry; (2) church is opposed on religious grounds to payment of Social Security and Medicare taxes (must file Form 8274 – specific requirements)

– Churches are not liable for Federal Unemployment Tax (may be liable for state)

– Housing Allowances can be given to ministers (an exclusion of the fair rental value of his or her home) – must be part of compensation plan and designated in advance of the payment

Page 30: Baylor Law School Nonprofit Organizations Spring 2005 Course Churches and Other Religious Organizations Prepared By: Darren B. Moore Bourland, Wall & Wenzel,

Next Week

Public Charities

Read pp. 266-294


Recommended