Republic of the Philippines
CONGRESS OF THE PHILIPPINES SENA TE Pasay City
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT
JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES
DATE : Tuesday, May 5, 2015 TIME : 10:00 a.m. VENUE : Sen. Ambrosio B. Padilla Room
2nd Floor, Senate of the Philippines Financial Center, Roxas Boulevard, Pasay City AGENDA : Senate Bill No. 2408 An Act Providing for
the Basic Law for the Bangsamoro and Abolishing the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, Repealing for the Purpose Republic Act No. 9054, Entitled An Act to Strengthen and Expand the Organic Act for the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, and Republic Act No. 6734, Entitled An Act Providing for an Organic Act for the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao, and for Other Purposes (by Senators Drilon, Sotto, A. Cayetano, Legarda, Recto, Ejercito, Binay, Escudero, Aquino, Angara, P. Cayetano, Honasan and Guingona)
ATTENDANCE
SENATORS PRESENT:
Hon. Ferdinand Bongbong Marcos Jr. - Chairman, Committee on
Local Government Hon. Francis Chiz Escudero - Member
1
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Page 2 GUESTS/RESOURCE PERSONS: Rev. Fr. Orlando B. Cardinal Quevedo-Citizens Peace Council; Archbishop
Cotabato City Rev. Fr. Joel E. Tabora - Representing His Eminence Luis
Antonio Cardinal Tagle, Citizens Peace Council; President, Ateneo de Davao University
Hon. Hilario G. Davide Jr. - Citizens Peace Council; Former Chief Justice, Supreme Court Mr. Cayetano W. Paderanga Jr. - Representing Mr. Jaime Augusto
Zobel de Ayala, Citizens Peace Council; Former Secretary, National Economic and Development Authority
Mr. Edilberto C. de Jesus - Citizens Peace Council; Former Secretary, Department of Education Prof. Moner Bajunaid - Citizens Peace Council; Consultant, International Organization for Migration (IOM) Ms. Victoria P. Garchitorena - Citizens Peace Council; Former Head,
Presidential Management Staff Ms. Bai Rohaniza Sumndad-Usman - Citizens Peace Council; Founder,
Teach Peace, Build Peace Movement Atty. Christian Monsod - Citizens Peace Council; Constitutionalist SENATORS STAFF: Atty. Luzviminda D. Lavarias - O/S Marcos Atty. Jose R. Cadiz Jr. - O/S Marcos Mr. Julius Palamos - O/S Marcos Ms. Shiela Mae Enriquez - O/S Marcos Ms. Marivic Ching - O/S Marcos Ms. Charlotte Franco - O/S Escudero Mr. Ronnie Calumpita - O/S Escudero Ms. Zheanne Aeson M. Dantis - O/S P. Cayetano Atty. Jason Co - O/S A. Cayetano Ms. Kristela Castronuevo - O/S Recto Ms. Paola Deles - O/S Aquino Mr. Brian See - O/S Legarda
2
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Tuesday, May 5, 2015 Page 3 Ms. Chynna Lacuna Pangan - O/S Legarda Mr. Doni Capuyan - O/S Osmea Mr. Abel Maglanque - O/S Santiago Ms. Regine Tenorio - O/S Santiago Atty. Katrina Bianca T. Tamayao - O/S Villar Mr. Fabs Lapada Jr. - O/S Binay Ms. Rizza Calimag - O/S Binay Ms. Ron Reyes - O/S Guingona SENATE SECRETARIAT:
Ms. Assumption Ingrid B. Reyes - Legislative Committee Secretary Committee on Local Government
Mr. Elpidio A. Calica - Legislative Committee Secretary Committee on Peace, Unification and
Reconciliation Mr. Guillermo E. Sapinoso Jr. - Committee Stenographer
Ms. Cristina D.C. Astrero - Committee Stenographer Ms. Christine M. Nery - Committee Stenographer Ms. Jocelyn A. Dela Cruz - Committee Stenographer Ms. Cleofe P. Caturla - Committee Stenographer Ms. Cindell B. Gealan - Committee Stenographer Ms. Jeanne M. Baisa - Committee Stenographer Mr. Felipe A. Dahino - Committee Clerk
Mr. Daniel D. Diamzon - Committee Clerk Mr. Clinton S. Martinez - STSRO
Mr. Eric Jalandoon - Legislative Page Mr. Emerson Carreon - Legislative Page Mr. Ronnie Cabaero - Legislative Page Mr. Alfonso Beltran - OSAA-SES Mr. Teddy Fernandez - OSAA-SES Mr. Elvis Diaz - Audio Operator
(For complete list, please see attached Attendance Sheet.)
3
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 1
AT 10:21 A.M., HON. FERDINAND BONGBONG R. MARCOS JR., CHAIRMAN OF THE COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT, CALLED THE HEARING TO ORDER.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Good morning ladies and
gentlemen.
The hearing of the Committee on Local Government joint with
the Committee on Peace, Unification and Reconciliation; the Committee
on Constitutional Amendments and Revision of Codes, of Tuesday, fifth
of May 2015, is called to order.
I would like to acknowledge the presence of Senator Chiz
Escudero and our resource persons who constitute some of the
members of the Citizens Peace Council. And it is precisely, the agenda
today is the report that the peace council has prepared and has
formally handed over to the Senate. You had witnessed it, the press
have witnessed it, the handover to the Senate President and once
again in the hearing room just moments ago.
So I would like to acknowledge for the record the presence of
different individuals who constitute the membership of the Citizens
Peace Councilthe former Chief Justice, Hilario Davide Jr.; Father Joel
Tabora, the president of the Ateneo de Davao University who is
representing His Eminence Luis Antonio Cardinal Tagle; Bai Rohaniza
Sumndad-Usman, the founder of Teach Peace, Build Peace Movement;
4
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 2 the former NEDA Secretary, Secretary Cayetano Paderanga, who
represents today Mr. Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala, the chairman and
CEO of Ayala Corporation; the former secretary of Education and
presently the president of the Asian Institute of Management,
Secretary Edilberto de Jesus; Professor Moner Bajunaid; and Ms.
Victoria Garchitorena who is the former PMS head.
Welcome to the Senate, ladies and gentlemen.
I understand from Chief Justice Davide that the presentation that
they will be making today has been organized into four subjects for
which clusters have been organized within the peace council.
So perhaps, I would yield the floor to Chief Justice Davide for,
maybe, an outline as to how you would like to conduct the briefing.
MR. DAVIDE. Yes, Mr. Chairman and Honorable Escudero.
There will be an opening statement to be delivered on behalf of
Cardinal Tagle by Father Tabora. And after that, Cluster 1, chaired by
this representation, will make the report for Cluster 1. Then for
Cluster 2, on Economy and Patrimony, Mr. Jaime Augusto Zobel de
Ayala will be represented by Dr. Paderanga. Then for the chapter on
justice and human development, we will have the youngest member of
the peace council, Bai Rohanisa Usman. And finally, Cluster 4,
represented by Dr. De Jesus, he was a co-chair of the cluster.
5
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 3
So afterwards, we will propose that all of them should first be
heard before any interpellation can be made so it would be a little
faster movement.
So may I request that Father Tabora be recognized for the
opening statement?
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Thank you, Chief.
Father Tabora, please, for your opening statement.
MR. TABORA. Mr. Chairman and Senator Chiz.
Only a year ago, our government and the Moro Islamic Liberation
Front signed the Comprehensive Agreement on the Bangsamoro.
Amidst much celebration, the public and the media, we might recall,
welcomed the end to war that it promised. Much has happened since
then. A working group prepared a draft legislation which was awaiting
review by Congress. Sadly, the Mamasapano incident which cost the
lives of combatants and civilians including an eight-year-old girl,
reawakened suspicions about the Muslim Filipinos and derailed the
peace process. Congress decided to stop its deliberations on the
Bangsamoro Basic Law as some members raised questions about the
sincerity of the MILF to abandon its insurgency.
On March 27th, President Benigno Aquino III invited five of us to
gather other independent-minded Filipinos to study the Bangsamoro
Basic Law to see how we could help clarify the many issues
6
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 4 surrounding it. Realizing the critical importance of the BBL to the
peace and development of Mindanao as well as to the peace and
development of the entire Philippines, we readily accepted the
challenge. Although we came from different fields of endeavor, we
were united in our desire for peace and believe that we should give its
every instrument a chance to prosper. This will require an effort to
understand the provisions of the BBL in the context of the history of
the insurgency waged by the MILF against the government and to
consider whether this law could effectively address the causes of
conflict. We would then give our views on the BBL and help move
forward the stalled peace process.
Cognizant of our limitations, we invited other leaders from
various sectors to join us as co-convenors and they in turn asked
others to come forward to undertake an independent evaluation of the
BBL provisions. We decided to focus only on contentious issues. We
were committed to seeking common ground. In all, 136 Filipinos,
Christians, Muslims and indigenous peoples, including religious leaders,
civil society representatives, deans of law schools, businessmen and
three of the framers of the 1987 Constitution came forward to
contribute their knowledge, experience and wisdom to the discussions.
We are truly grateful to all of them for their time, their sharing and
7
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 5 their goodwill and have included all their names in an annex to our
report.
We divided ourselves into clusters and reviewed the BBL along
these four themes: first, constitutionality, forms and powers of
government; second, economy and patrimony; third, social justice and
human development; and, fourth, peace and order and human
security.
We held separate cluster meetings over a span of two weeks and
held a five-hour plenary on April 18th. As Ambassador Dee described
it, the plenary was an avenue for dialogue between and among
independent-minded citizens who believe in the importance of
understanding the BBL and discussing its implications for peace and
development in our country in a calm and reasonable manner. We
took time to learn from previous studies and from resource persons
who presented views informed by years of studying and attempting to
resolve the issues. We recognized some controversial aspects of the
draft but we also shared the view that the legislation for autonomy
requires a search for compromise and consensus. The entire process
involved the freewheeling exchange of ideas and views asking hard
questions, seeking clarification, engaging in debate and
argumentation.
8
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-1 May 5, 2015 10:21 a.m. 6
Overall, we agreed that the BBL is overwhelmingly acceptable
and deserves the support of all Filipinos.
On the few provisions that needed some refinement, we offer our
recommendations. The BBL seeks to implement the constitutional
mandate for autonomy enshrined by the 1987 Constitution. This
process began with the good faith effort of the government to establish
the Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao.../jun
9
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 1
MR. TABORA. of Muslim Mindanao. To a large extent, the
grant of autonomy within the framework of national sovereignty had
prevented conflict from getting out of hand. Clearly, autonomy and
peace and development, all constitutional mandates have become
inseparable.
We also realized that the BBL will bring benefits that will redound
not only to the Bangsamoro but to all Filipinos. Mindanao holds the
nations untapped but already threatened resources. The potential for
development in that region will mean greater productivity for all. The
exercise has brought home to us the conviction that the BBL should be
passed; that to set it aside now would be imprudent and wasteful of
previous efforts. Peacemakers on both sides have spent no less than
17 years to bring us to this juncture. There is enough goodwill on both
sides, to bring this agreement to its conclusion, one that would renew
and refresh communities in the most deprived regions of the country
with a genuine fresh start.
So many others, some eminent public figures, others less known,
have given their time to this struggle for peace. They have engaged in
dialogue and discussion to bring their issues to the table to find
common ground. At no other time has so much political will been
10
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 2 invested in the peace process. It seems unwise for us to end this now
and try to restart in an indefinite future.
Before the plenary was adjourned, Cardinal Orlando Quevedo
graced the meeting and offered his own insights. He also offered a
partnership between his pro-peace group, the Friends for Peace, with
the members of the Council and encouraged us to reach out to other
groups with the same objectivespeace and development for all
Filipinos. Indeed, we saw our effort only as one of other citizen efforts
and those of government, some larger than our own whose work has
been more arduous, taking longer than our own.
We submit our report as our contribution to the search for peace
in Mindanao and in our country. We will communicate what we have
learned and make available the reading materials we reviewed.
We express in the report our support for the passage of the BBL
together with our recommendations on a few provisions. We hope that
the Congress and our people can overcome their prejudices. We
cannot pursue peace on the basis of mutual fear and distrust. All of us
must undertake an active search for justice, truth, respect, love and
peace. We will exert all efforts in disseminating our findings, assuring
everyone of the independence of the process. We do so with trust and
faith that other citizens like us will decide that the Bangsamoro Basic
11
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 3 Law places peace within our grasppeace for Mindanano and peace for
all Filipinos.
Thank you, Mr. Chair.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Thank you, Father Tabora,
for the opening statement.
Perhaps, now, we can proceed to the first cluster which is to do
with constitutionality and I think that the former Chief Justice Hilario
Davide will be the one who will take us to the points on that subject in
the report of the councils.
So, Chief Justice, please.
MR. DAVIDE. Thank you very much, Mr. Chairman, and
Honorable Escudero.
Shalom! A very peaceful morning to all of us. Let me forthwith
express our profound gratitude to you honorable Chairman for inviting
us the Citizens Peace Council and to hear us on our final report.
I was designated chairman of Cluster 1 which was assigned to
study the proposed BBL and Senate Bill No. 2408 and House Bill No.
4994 and to focus on the principal issues concerning or relating to
constitutionality, form and powers of government and to plebiscite.
The cluster took special note of the fact that the proposed Bangsamoro
Basic Law (BBL) which is envisioned to fulfill one of the most significant
12
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 4 mandates of the 1987 Constitution is being questioned and threatened
with an abrupt end with arguments that it contravenes the
Constitution. The cluster members conducted a review of the
numerous position papers, studies and statements presented and
circulated both by those who are opposed to the BBL and those who
are defending the BBL. Shifting through the different positions, the
cluster then identified key contentious issues that need to be examined
and addressed. The task was difficult and challenging for both
oppositors and supporters articulated the respective positions with
strong arguments.
As to Senate Bill No. 2408, we have to immediately consider the
fact that it is authored and introduced by 13 senators or a majority of
the Senate already headed by our Senate President Franklin Drilon and
the Honorable Senators Sotto III, Alan Peter Cayetano, Legarda,
Recto, Ejercito, Binay, Escudero, Aquino IV, Angara, Pia Cayetano,
Honasan II and Guingona III. Since all of them are presumed to be
fully convinced that the BBL suffers from no constitutional infirmity,
the cluster could have forthwith closed the chapter, yes, he has all the
chapters of each study. But it could not for it had before it the
counterpart House Bill No. 4994, authored and introduced by only 17,
headed by Honorable Speaker Belmonte Jr., of the more than 300
13
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 5 members of the House of Representatives. The cluster had has to
move forward relentlessly up to the end.
The Senate also has given the Citizens Peace Council and its
Cluster 1 immeasurable joy. Its report is heard first by this
Committee. It is chaired by a highly respected chairman who is more
popularly known throughout the Philippines as Senator Bongbong
Marcos. It could be purely serendipity, Mr. Chairman, that the draft
BBL the Committee will now deliberate vis--vis the report of the
Citizens Peace Council can now have a new historic meaning of
transcendental significance. The meaning is Bongbong Law or
Bongbongs legacy.
Let me now take up my assigned task.
Major findings. The clusters meticulous analysis of the major
contentious issues on the BBL in light and on the basis of the
interrelated propositions constituting the framework of the discussions
which I shall take up later on led to the following major findings:
One, the BBL does not vest state status to the Bangsamoro
government. The provisions on people, territory and self-
determination are not vestiges of a separate state but are consistent
with the constitutionally mandated creation of autonomous regions.
14
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-1 May 5, 2015 10:31 a.m. 6
Second, the Bangsamoro government, parliamentary in form, as
constituted in the BBL, is compliant with the requirements of the
Constitution. The government with an executive department and
legislative assembly has offices that are elective and representative of
the constituent political units.
Third, the intergovernmental relations between the national
government and the Bangsamoro government are consistent with the
allocation of powers mandated by the Constitution. It defined
relationship between the national government and the Bangsamoro
government embodies the essence of genuine autonomy based on
principles of subsidiarity and solidarity.
Fourth, the Supreme Court and the constitutional bodies
continue to maintain the powers that are given them under the
Constitution. There is neither substitution nor diminution of powers
intended or effected by the creation of the Bangsamoro human rights
auditing, civil service and electoral offices.
Fifth and finally, the plebiscite requirement of the BBL adheres to
the provision of the Constitution on the process for creation of the
autonomous region.
Now, our basis for the findings which I shall explain/cda
15
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 1
MR. DAVIDE. which I shall explain in seriatim.
There are several objections to BBL provisions on people,
territory, and self-determination because of the fear of an intended or
unwitting creation or recognition of a separate Bangsamoro state. The
cluster finds no basis for such fear.
First, defining a Bangsamoro people does not create a new
citizenry or nationality. The definition of the Bangsamoro People in
the BBL is only an affirmation of identity, not a definition of citizenship
in the Bangsamoro area. The word peoples is used as a descriptive
term with respect to the indigenous peoples of which the
Bangsamoro people is a part. There does not appear to be any
indication or intent to create a new kind of citizen. The non-
Bangsamoro do not lose civil or political rights, and qualifications for
candidacy and the Bangsamoro do not require identification as a
Bangsamoro people.
Where the term citizen may be interpreted as restrictive as in
the case of the Social Justice provision (Article IV, Section 7), the term
constituent or inhabitant may be applied in its stead. In that case,
the BBL provisions describing a Bangsamoro people may stand
without need of clarification.
16
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 2
Second, defining a Bangsamoro territory does not create or imply
an independent state. The word territory whether in legal or in
ordinary parlance means generally an area under a particular
jurisdiction. An area with its own defined area, jurisdiction or rules
does not make that territory independent from its parent state. It is
used to describe trust territories, incorporated and unincorporated
territories, occupied territories, non-self-governing territories,
dependent territories or external and internal territories, each with
varying degrees of powers and independence and historical
antecedence.
The Constitution describes provinces, cities, municipalities and
barangays as territorial subdivisions and describes adjacent
territories of legislative districts. The Local Government Code frequently
refers to the areas of local government units as territories. Article X,
Section 20 of the Constitution speaks of the territorial jurisdiction of
the autonomous regions.
As with the current ARMM Organic Act, there is even a
declaration in the BBL that the Bangsamoro territory shall remain a
part of the Philippines. This is an unequivocal rejection of the idea of
statehood.
17
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 3
However, as regards the opt-in provisions of contiguous
territories, the core Bangsamoro territories should not be allowed to
increase indefinitely by the periodic vote of 10 percent of registered
voters in the outer territories. The establishment of a plebiscite that
fixes the territory is a congressional prerogative that cannot be
delegated.
A perpetual opt-in provision makes the Bangsamoro territory
indefinite and keeps the organic act in constant flux. Since the
creation of an autonomous region, including the definition of its
territory, is the sole function of Congress, such changes of territory
that establishes the limits of the region requires the specific acts of
Congress. An indefinite opt-in provision would be an undue delegation
of legislative power to a possible erratic 10 percent of an indeterminate
population.
For purposes of clarity, it is therefore recommended that
references to the opt-in provisions in Article III, Section 3, and Article
XV, Section 4 be deleted. With the deletions, the definition of the
Bangsamoro territory in the BBL may stand.
Third, the right of self-determination is a right of all peoples and
is not equivalent to the right to statehood. Its claim and use in the BBL is not a
promise of secession but a declaration of a right all Filipinos possess.
18
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 4 The Constitutional promise to the Muslim Mindanao and the Cordilleras
of their own autonomous region is itself recognition of the need for the
peoples identified therein to exercise differently their own right to self-
determination as part of the larger Filipino nation.
The term self-determination was popularized around the early
20th century when there were increasing moves to decolonize. It is
within the era of decolonization that self-determination implied
secession. Outside of decolonization, there is no such link. Self-
determination is therefore generally understood to mean what our
Supreme Court has recognized as internal self-determination. While
international law recognizes the right to self-determination of peoples,
there is no right to statehood, and there is no right to secession. As
international law encourages peoples to determine their identity, it also
frowns upon the destabilization of states and breaches of international
peace that would occur if there was constant internal struggle to
secede, and where groups of peoples can be formed based not only on
religion, but on race or ethnicity, or any other criteria.
Thus, the BBL provision may stand without need of clarification.
The parliamentary form of government for the Bangsamoro is
permitted by our Constitution. The prescribed unitary and Presidential
form of government established in the Constitution refers to the
19
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 5 national government. When it comes to the government of
autonomous regions, however, the Constitution only requires that it
shall consist specifically of the executive department and legislative
assembly, both of which shall be elective and representative of the
constituent political units. This is met in the BBL even though the Chief
Minister of the Bangsamoro government is elected by the Bangsamoro
parliament and not directly by the electorate, as there is no
requirement in the Constitution that the autonomous regions chief
executive be directly elected by the electorate. In fact, Congress may
provide a different government structure within all local government
units. The Constitution only requires Congress to enact a local
government code which shall provide for a more responsive and
accountable local government structure instituted through a system of
decentralization. What structure is more responsive
and accountable is left to the wisdom of legislature.
However, there are provisions to the parliamentary form of
government that need some refinements. (1) There is a need to
harmonize the use of terms. In Article IV, Section 2, the BBL provides
that the Bangsamoro Government shall be parliamentary. In Section 3 of the
same article, however, the BBL uses the term, ministerial form of
government. So also in No. 57 of Section 3, on exclusive powers, of
20
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 6 Article V on powers of government, To avoid any confusion and
possible misinterpretation, it is recommended that the term
ministerial be dropped and replaced with parliamentary for
consistency and clarity.
Second, the BBLs Article VII, Section 34 provides for the call for
a new parliamentary election upon a two-thirds vote of no confidence
of all members of parliament against the government of the day.
While this may be one of the models of the parliamentary form of
government, it may mean the holding of elections for the Bangsamoro
parliament every time there is no confidence vote, that is not later
than 120 days from the date of dissolution. This will run counter to the
constitutionally mandated synchronization of national and local
elections, which, as held in the recent decision in Abbas Kida versus
Senate should include the ARMM elections, as it is a local election
based on the wording and structure of the Constitution.
To address this, it is recommended that the vote of no
confidence must affect the government of the day, not the parliament,
so that parliamentary elections in the Bangsamoro can be synchronized
with other national and local elections. In this connection, the issue of
separation of church and state may arise. Passing the BBL does not
constitute establishment of religion, much less enforce one upon
21
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CMNERY III-1 May 5, 2015 10:41 a.m. 7 Filipino citizens. The creation of an autonomous Muslim Mindanao or
the use of a Wali as a titular head of the Bangsamoro does not
violate the principle of separation of Church and State. Muslim
Mindanao is a term used in the Constitution to describe the
autonomous region and as a proper recipient of government money as
a government unit. It is meant to be as descriptive as the term
Christian majority is used to describe the rest of the country. The
BBL actually secularizes/cmn
22
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 1
MR. DAVIDE. The BBL actually secularizes the name further by
using the word Bangsamoro with more emphasis on their historic
character than as a religious one. And Wali is not required to be a
religious person, and as described or defined, is as much a guardian or
head. As it is, our Constitution does not prevent priests from holding
public office, only that there are no religious sectors.
I will now present the discussion of the cluster on the issues
relating to intergovernmental relations between the central
government and the Bangsamoro government.
The powers of government are classified in the BBL as: (1)
those that are reserved to the central government; (2) powers that are
concurrent between the central government and the Bangsamoro
government; and (3) powers that are exclusive or devolved to the
Bangsamoro government. This allocation of powers is consistent with
the mandate of the Constitution. The recommendations of the cluster
only pertain to minimal provisions and additional wordings.
The grant of exclusive powers to the Bangsamoro government is
not tantamount to a superior Bangsamoro government or a weakened
central government. It only refers to powers that are devolved to the
Bangsamoro government, which remains under central government,
but as an autonomous region. To remove such misunderstanding, the
23
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 2
title of the Section on exclusive powers may be amended to read:
Section 3. Exclusive and Devolved Powers. This will emphasize that
the source of this exclusivity is devolution of powers.
The difference with respect to the creation of autonomous
regions is the constitutional right to greater delegated powers with
more freedom to use it, not as compared to the national government
but as compared to other political subdivisions. Since the Constitution
does not allow the creation of any other state or the secession of any
peoples, the BBL provisions can imply nothing more than internal
organization and creation of the Bangsamoro nation as an internal
subdivision of the State with designated powers. Congress would have
no authority to do anything more.
Intergovernmental relations in the BBL refer to the concept of
devolution as inspired by the principles of subsidiarity. The President
exercises general supervision only over the Bangsamoro government
as required by the Constitution. This is clear in the BBL and there is no
provision that indicates a reduced power of the President. Running
parallel to the principle of subsidiarity is the principle of solidarity as an
inherent right and duty of the state and not just by the President. As
provided in Sections 1 and 6 of Article XII, all areas of economy,
whether in the declaration that all economic agents contribute to the
24
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 3
common good, where all regions are given the optimum opportunity
to develop or where the private sector is encouraged to broaden the
base of ownership and own and operate economic enterprises, these
rights are always subject to the duty of the state to promote
distributive justice and to intervene when the common good demands.
The principle of the solidarity is already reflected in the BBL
section on devolution and subsidiarity requiring all government
decisions to adhere to considerations of good governance and the
general welfare.
It is therefore suggested for greater emphasis, that Section 6 of
Article VI on devolution and subsidiarity be amended, to read:
Principles of Devolution and Subsidiarity, and of Solidarity, and that
all BBL provisions that refer to the principle of subsidiarity, such as the
preamble should concomitantly include the principle of solidarity.
I will now discuss the controversial term asymmetric
relationship. Some comments on the BBL equate the asymmetric
relationship between the central government and the Bangsamoro
government as similar to the associative relationship that was rejected
by the Supreme Court in the BBLs predecessor, the MOA-AD. A simple
perusal of the BBL in relation to the allocation of powers and the
intergovernmental relations, as discussed earlier, will clearly
25
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 4
demonstrate that asymmetric relationship is different from associative
relationship.
However, to obviate any doubt as to the meaning of
asymmetric relationship, a definition of the term in the BBL may be
inserted. The proposed definition will state that the term asymmetric
relationship refers to the relationship between the central government
and the Bangsamoro government as an autonomous region where, as
provided under Section 15, Article X of the 1987 Constitution, the
autonomous regions are granted more powers and less intervention
from the national government than territorial and political subdivisions.
The term territorial and political subdivisions refers to other local
government units. This is a combination of the definition proposed by
Dean Antonio G.M. La Via and the description provided by Justice
Marvic Leonen in his concurring opinion in the case of League of
Provinces of the Philippines versus DENR.
The enumeration of powers given to the Bangsamoro parliament
under the BBL is consistent with the the constitutional provision. Article
X, Section 20 of the Constitution is broad enough as it includes a
paragraph on such other matters as may be authorized by law for the
promotion of the general welfare of the people of the region. The
potential overlap between the legislative powers and the Congress and
26
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 5
the Bangsamoro parliament, which is objected to by some experts, is
an unavoidable consequence that is also true as far as the legislative
powers of regular local governments sanggunians are concerned.
These potential overlaps or even conflicts should be addressed by the
application of the principles on hierarchy of laws and on conflict of
laws.
The grant to the Bangsamoro government of the authority,
power and right to explore, develop and utilize the natural resources
within its territorial jurisdiction is an acceptable formulation. However,
it is proposed that such authorization given to the Bangsamoro
government must be understood as subject to the provisions of the
Constitution on national economy and patrimony.
As regards the fiscal autonomy provisions, we did not find any
constitutional infirmity in the provisions of the BBL. The block grant is
not akin to the PDAF that was declared unconstitutional by the
Supreme Court. The block grant referred to in the BBL is similar to the
Internal Revenue Allotment or IRA under the Local Government Code.
In fact, the wording of BBLs Article XII, Sections 15 to 17 is very
similar to the Local Government Codes formulation in its Sections 284
and 286. Similar to the provisions concerning the IRA for ordinary local
governments, the block grant for the autonomous region is a faithful
27
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 6
adherence to the constitutional mandate that local governments shall
have a just share, as determined by law, in the national taxes which
shall be automatically released to them.
On the justice system, the cluster also reviewed the BBL
provisions relating thereto. The BBL Section 3 of Article X provides for
the power of the Bangsamoro parliament to enact laws pertaining to
persons and family relations, and other civil law matters, commercial
law, criminal law, including the definition of crimes and prescription of
penalties thereof. This provision is within the powers of the legislature
to delegate to local governments as provided for in Article VI, Section
1 of the Constitution. Despite the restrictive wording in the
Constitutions Article X, Section 18 and Section 20, paragraph 4, which
provides that legislative powers of the autonomous region may only
extend to personal, property, and family relations, Section 20,
paragraph 9, also states that the Organic Act shall provide for
legislative powers over such other matters as may be authorized by
law for the promotion of the general welfare of the people of the
region.
Article X, Sections 5, 6, and 7 of the BBL provides for the
establishment of Shariah circuit courts, Shariah district courts, and
Shariah High Court, respectively. These provisions are within the
28
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES JADela Cruz IV-1 May 5, 2015 10:51 a.m. 7
power of Congress to define and expand the jurisdiction of courts.
Under the Constitution, the Congress shall have the power to define,
prescribe and apportion the jurisdiction of the various courts, Article 8,
Section 2. Hence, this legislative power can be included in the
additional matters that Congress can authorize the autonomous
regions to possess. Furthermore, it should be clarified that judicial
authority is not being granted to Bangsamoro government. It must be
noted that/jad
29
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 1 MR. DAVIDE. noted that in BBLs Article VII on the
Bangsamoro government, there is a set of provisions on the
parliament, and a set of provisions on the executive officers, but none
on the judiciary. Judicial power remains with the Supreme Court,
which is vested by the Constitution with such power, Article VIII,
Section 1 of the Constitution. The BBL envisions the creation of special
lower courts under the control and supervision of the Supreme Court.
Article X, Section 1 of the BBL provides that the justice system in the
Bangsamoro shall consist of the Shariah Law--it should be court--
with application over Muslim only, the traditional or tribal justice
system for the indigenous peoples in the Bangsamoro local courts and
the alternative dispute resolution systems.
The BBLs provision in Article X, Section 7 may be seen as being
unconstitutional for apparently limiting the jurisdiction of the Supreme
Court provided under Section 5, Article VIII of the Constitution, which
jurisdiction Congress may not amend under Section 2 of Article VIII.
The provision states that the decisions the the Shariah High Court
shall be final and executory. This is not unique to the BBL. The Labor
Code, as an example is replete with provisions making decisions of the
secretary, the National Labor Relations Commission and the Voluntary
Arbitrator final and executory. Despite this wording, however, the
30
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 2 Supreme Court has consistently ruled that such decisions shall still be
subject to the review powers of the Supreme Court.
In order to avert any confusion, the provision may be amended
to include the clause Subject to the review powers of the Supreme
Court.
Now, on the constitutional bodies. The BBL introduces the
creation of the following bodies: Bangsamoro Human Rights
Commission; Bangsamoro Auditing Body; Bangsamoro Civil Service
Office; and the Bangsamoro Electoral Office. The validity of the
provisions on these bodies is being questioned on the main ground
that their creation and the power vested in them under the BBL are
unconstitutional as they unduly assume the expanded powers vested in
the national constitutional bodies.
The reference to the Human Rights Commission, Auditing Body,
and Civil Service, as constitutional bodies is inaccurate and may be
misleading. They can be distinguished from other offices, which the
Bangsamoro government may later establish, because they have been
specifically mentioned in the organic act, the BBL. They derive their
basis of existence not from any ordinary law that may be promulgated
by the Bangsamoro parliament, but from the organic act itself. This
does not mean, however, that they are constitutional bodies in the
31
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 3 sense that they can adversely affect the roles, mandates and powers
of the constitutional bodies established by the Constitution, COA, Civil
Service Commission, and Commission on Human Rights.
The wording of the BBL is clear. The Bangsamoro special bodies
were created with the goal of supplementing, not supplanting the work
of their national counterparts. As such, sections which provide for the
creation of these Bangsamoro bodies include the clause without
prejudice to the powers, authorities and duties of the national
constitutional bodies for the civil service and the auditing office, and
the clause, shall have a coordination and complementary relationship
for the Human Rights Commission.
The way that the BBL is structured will show that the powers
exercised by the Bangsamoro special bodies are not exclusive powers
but concurrent powers meant to be exercised in a coordinative and
complementary manner with the national constitutional bodies and
without prejudice to the constitutional bodies exercise of their
respective mandates and powers under the Constitution.
However, the comment of the Commission on Audit on the issue
is enlightening. In COAs position paper, it was recommended that the
Bangsamoro Auditing Office could only mean or refer to an internal
body or office, an internal auditor, in the nature of and within the
32
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 4 functions provided in Republic Act No. 3456, as amended by Republic
Act 4177, otherwise known as the Internal Auditing Act. This means
that the Bangsamoro government is not precluded from creating a
special body like an auditing office as long as it will be considered as
an internal body, which will not, in any way, prevent or obstruct the
functions and powers of the COA.
The Bangsamoro Electoral Office is distinct, for there is a
categorical provision saying that it shall be part of the Commission on
Elections. In fact, even its budget is part of the appropriations of the
Comelec. Thus, the electoral office is not among the concurrent
powers as the evident intent is for the Bangsamoro government not to
have its own election office, leaving these functions solely with the
national government.
It is, therefore, recommended that to the last sentence of Article
V, Section 2 Paragraph 8 of the BBL which reads: The Bangsamoro
government shall have primary disciplinary authority over its own
officials and employees, the clause without prejudice to the powers
of the Civil Service Commission and the Ombudsman be added to
address the Ombudsmans concern that said section diminishes the
Ombudsmans mandate over public officials and employees.
33
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 5
I shall not take up the issue of plebiscite. For the establishment
of the Bangsamoro and the determination of the Bangsamoro territory
to take effect, the BBL requires the ratification of the BBL itself by
majority of the votes cast in a plebiscite in the geographical areas
enumerated therein. This plebiscite requirement adheres to the
constitutional provision on the process for creation of the autonomous
region. The Constitution is categorical in saying that the creation of
the autonomous region shall be effective when approved by majority of
the votes cast by the constituent units in a plebiscite called for the
purpose, Article X, Section 18.
Section 3, Paragraph (e) of BBLs Article XV provides for the opt-
in of contiguous areas where there is a resolution of the local
government unit or petition of at least 10 percent of the registered
voters in the geographical area for their inclusion, and majority of the
registered voters vote for their areas inclusion in a plebiscite called for
that purpose. This must be distinguished from Section 4 of the same
article, which was discussed earlier in relation to territory. Section
3(e) refers to the inclusion of contiguous areas in the plebiscite for the
approval of the BBL, while Section 4 applies to the additional
contiguous areas after the ratification of the BBL.
34
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 6
For Your Honors information, one of the annexes to the final
report of the Citizens Peace Council contains some suggested
amendments or refinements to affected provisions of the BBL.
After our discussions of the Clusters major findings, and the
bases thereof, allow me now to briefly present the overall framework
that guided the Cluster in its review of the BBL.
The Clusters analysis of the BBL is premised on five interrelated
propositions that serve as the over-arching framework for the Clusters
task.
First, the passage of a law that creates an autonomous region is
a constitutional mandate.
Second, the passage of an organic law for the autonomous
region is compelled by the imperative of correcting the injustices of the
past, the urgency of the socioeconomic-political context at present,
and the uncertainty of having a similar opportunity in the future.
Third, autonomy, especially in the context of the Constitutions
mandate for the creation of autonomous region is, in itself, a
peculiarity, and the region that is given autonomy must be recognized
and respected for its uniqueness.
Fourth, the BBL must be understood as an extraordinary special
law, not only because of its nature as an organic act, but also, and
35
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Caturla V-1 May 5, 2015 11:01 a.m. 7 more importantly, as an embodiment of a peace agreement, the
product of prolonged negotiations.
Fifth, the Constitution must be interpreted liberally, so as to give
life to its provisions, and allow the fulfillment of the decades-old
mandate for genuine regional autonomy.
Unlike ordinary legislation, the passage of the BBL is not merely
part of the regular exercise of the States legislative powers. It is the
performance of a sacred constitutional duty. Viewed differently, as the
eminent constitutionalist Father Joaquin Bernas, S.J., would put it, the
establishment of the autonomous regions is not a question of
privilegecpc
36
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 1
MR. DAVIDE. of the autonomous regions is not a question of
privilege, but a question of right for the regions that were guaranteed
autonomy.
The statement of the 14 surviving members of the 1986
Constitutional Commission, myself included, aptly characterized the
realization of the constitutional promise as closing the gap between
law and justice.
The negotiations for the Bangsamoro Peace Agreement have
dragged on for 17 years. The result is an autonomous law that
broadens the original one and more fully complies with our
governments constitutional promise and duty. With the Aquino
governments commitment and the trust that it has generated among
the Bangsamoro people, the current context provides an auspicious
timing for the creation of the Bangsamoro Autonomous Region. And
with the fast approaching elections and the upcoming transition in
government, further delay in the completion of the process could
effectively derail the peace agreement. Autonomy and subgovernance
are not equivalent to independence or statehood. It is a statement of
national unity achieved, not just by acknowledging human diversity,
but allowing diversity to thrive.
37
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 2
The autonomous regions were created as special local
governments that were distinct from the territorial and political
subdivisions existing prior to the 1987 Constitution. The specific
provisions on the autonomous regions are not just token statements
about internally diverse histories and cultures of the Philippines. They
are a recognition that despite the case at, these different cultures
had not been served in any effective way by the national government.
The Constitution, therefore, contemplates that within the single
democratic and republican Philippine State, Congress would create
autonomous regions that could exercise all traditional powers of
governmentpolice power, taxation, and eminent domain in the same
way as all local government units, but would enjoy less interference
from the national government. This flexibility and freedom given to
the autonomous regions is the only way they could successfully chart
their own unique path.
Parenthetically, the creation of such a sui generis autonomous
region in Muslim Mindanao can be considered as a pilot case and model
for the future development of the rest of the country including
revisiting the effectiveness of the unitary system.
The BBL must be understood in its proper content. It is a non-
ordinary legislative proposal comes into being merely with the
38
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 3
sponsorship of a legislator or a group of legislators. It is likewise not
comparable to a number of legislative proposal that came out of a
process of drafting by stakeholders and eventually picked up by
champions among the legislators. The BBL is a product of a peace
agreement, forged after decades of peace negotiations, borne out of
the countrys exhaustion with war. The negotiations were done with
the participation of international facilitators and observers. The
drafting of the BBL underwent an elaborate process even necessitating
the creation of a composite Bangsamoro Transition Commission. This
does not mean however that the Congress as the repository of
legislative powers is deprived of rights at its constitutional
prerogative. On the contrary, understanding the nature of the BBL will
place greater significance on the legislative progress and put it in the
proper perspective.
In interpreting the BBL, any doubt may be construed liberally
and not restrictively so as to give life to the constitutional mandates.
The BBL does not guide the interpretation of the Constitution. The
Constitution guides the interpretation of the BBL.
Much of the confusion concerning about the constitutionality of
the BBL can be resolved by applying one and the most basic rules of
interpretation in Constitutional Law. That as the fundamental,
39
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 4
paramount and supreme law of the nation, the Constitution is deemed
written in every statute and contract. As a rule of statutory
construction, if there are provisions, statute irreconcilable with the
Constitution, the Constitution prevails.
When reading the proposed Bangsamoro Basic Law, it is
therefore presumed that all constitutional powers of government and
the constitutional commissions and bodies remain intact regardless of
whether the law explicitly provides for it or not. There is no creation of
a separate kind of citizen, and no creation, virtual or otherwise, of a
political territory that is greater than the national government that
creates it or beyond the reach of the Constitution that allows it. There
can be no surreptitious abandonment of the Constitution because even
if it is the intention, there can be no interpretation or statute that could
recognize it.
In sum, the BBL complies with the Constitutions mandate for the
creation of autonomous regions within the framework of the
Constitution and the national sovereignty as well as territorial integrity
of the Republic of the Philippines. While imperfect, it is a significant
document that should serve as catalyst for building national consensus
towards the realization of the long-term aspiration expressed by the
40
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 5
country three decades ago for justice, solidarity and peace for
Mindanao and the entire Philippines.
But I wish to end by emphasizing a very important point. In the
separate meetings of the clusters and in the plenary meeting on April
18, the issue of social justice and human development took a very
prominent role in the discussions. It came out as a common concern.
Indeed, it was a unified thing for the four clusters. So as the country
eagerly awaits the actions of the policymakers on this important
legislation, I must emphasize that the BBL is not just about the grant
of autonomy. It should not be seen as merely a matter of division of
powers, resources or responsibilities between the national government
and autonomous region. The BBL should be understood for what it
really is, an instrument to pursue social justice and development for
the constituents of the autonomous region, for the entire Mindanao,
and for the country in general.
The BBL is a path to peace. Though it cannot solve all the
problems of the country or of the autonomous region, but it is a
foundational element of a necessary first step without which many
worthy initiatives cannot even be tried. There is no guarantee of
success as no constitution or law or government can make such a
41
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 6
guarantee, but it is a momentous opening for opportunities, for a new
beginning to correct the mistakes of the past, to craft a better future.
We have all loss so much in waging war against each other for so
long. Now is the time for the country to try to win by being united in
pursuing justice, peace and development.
Thank you very much, Your Honor, for the time.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Thank you, Chief Justice
Davide.
We will, as promised, proceed with the next presentation. We
make the observation, as you were making your presentation, Chief,
that there are significant divergences between the interpretation that
you have put forward and that of the OPAPP and the MILF, and for that
matter, the Executive Department. So perhaps those are the areas
which we will have toit puts the Committee in a bit of a quandary
because we have to now resolve those significant divergences as I
have mentioned them, but thank you for your inputs.
SEN. ESCUDERO. Mr. Chairman, if I may.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Yes, Senator Escudero.
SEN. ESCUDERO. On that point, precisely, on those two points.
Una po, Chief Justice, salamat po sa inyong presentasyon.
Marami ho akong napakinggan na unang beses ko pa lang
42
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CBGealan VI-1 May 5, 2015 11:11 a.m. 7
napakinggan na kung OPAPP lang sana o MILF po ang nagsabi niyan,
malayong mas maganda siguro ang naging diskusyon kaugnay ng BBL.
I ask this question. So, therefore, the position of the Peace
Panel is this. BBL, as amended, not BBL as is. BBL is constitutional if
it is amended via the perfecting amendments that you presented.
Would that be a correct statement?
MR. DAVIDE. Our concentration was not on the BBL itself as
constitutional or unconstitutional. We selected certain provisions which
have been found to be unconstitutional. It would only be this part that
will be affected.
SEN. ESCUDERO. Opo.
MR. DAVIDE. So, okay.
And then we made recommendations. It would be very, very
clear from our recommendations that unless we do something about
these areas of concern and some refinements will be done, then the
constitutional issue/cbg
43
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 1
MR. DAVIDE. ...constitutional issue may remain. So, hence,
our proposal that probably we could improve and therefore submit one
which would really comply with the Constitution.
SEN. ESCUDERO. You are more diplomatic than I am, Mr. Chief
Justice, but the long and short of it is not as is. You are in favor of the
contentious provisions of the BBL that you discussed, but not as is. It
needs refinements.
MR. DAVIDE. Not the entire, as I said.
SEN. ESCUDERO. Not the entire, just those that you have
looked at.
MR. DAVIDE. Only those portions.
SEN. ESCUDERO. Yes.
MR. DAVIDE. Because we cannot simply declare the entire
thing as unconstitutional when only a few...
SEN. ESCUDERO. Definitely.
MR. DAVIDE. ...are found to be violative of the Constitution or
perceived to be violative of the Constitution.
SEN. ESCUDERO. I only raised that point, Mr. Chief Justice,
distinguished members of the panel, because that has been the mantra
of both the OPAPP, the MILF and the Executive Branch, including
Malacaang, as is where is.
44
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 2
I am glad that we cleared that now. That even the Peace Panel
is not suggesting an as is where is approval of the BBL, at least
insofar as the contentious provisions that you reviewed are concerned.
That is as kind as I can be to them, Mr. Chief Justice.
The second point, as the former chief justice, sir, as Senator
Marcos said, ano po ba ang kinalaman nito sa buong usapin kaugnay
ng BBL at pagpasa nito? Sabi nga po niya, iba ang sinasabi ninyo
mas magalang, mas mabait, mas maliwanagsa sinasabi po ng OPAPP
at MILF na siyang nagbalangkas, sumulat at naghubog nitong BBL na
ito.
Kung titingnan po natin sa perspektibo ng batas ang titingnan
intent o intensyon ng Kongreso base sa mga nagsulat nito, maliwanag
ho na hindi kami ang nagsulat nito. Alam naman ho ng buong bansa
na ang nagsulat nito, sa pagitan lamang ito ng MILF at ng OPAPP at ng
GRP. Iba ho iyong korte at maaaring iba ang pananaw ng korte
kaugnay sa constitutionality ng ilang mga probisyon.
May I ask, Mr. Chief Justice, what relation, if any, does the
opinion or do your opinions have and that of the peace panel as well to
the BBL that we will be passing? Ito ba ay may persuasive effect sa
interpretasyong ibibigay namin dito o sa ibibigay ng Korte Suprema
pagdating ng panahon? Because, for example, I have heard former
45
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 3
Concom members expressing their opinions about the BBL. But that
was never discussed in the Concom debates. Anything they say today,
even if they were a former Concom delegate, has no relation to the
BBL because they did not discuss that when they discussed Article X,
Sections 15 to 21 of the Constitution. So thats a bit unfair, to say the
least, when they are speaking as a former Concom member and
saying, This is constitutional, this is not, when that was not even in
the deliberation.
So in light of that, by analogy, what relation will this have, if
any? Because I am comforted by a lot of the statements you said, as
in marami ho sa ating mga kababayan ang makakatulog sa lahat ng
sinabi ninyo o sa interpretasyon o sa pagbasa ninyo ng BBL. Subalit
ano ho ba ang kinalaman niyan, kung mayroon man, sa aktwal na
magiging interpretasyon ng BBL? Dahil iba nga po ang pananaw ng
OPAPP at GRP at MILF sa mga sinasabi ninyo? Best example of which
would be the constitutional bodies. Ang sagot ho sa amin ng OPAPP at
GRP, regional offices lang ito. If these are regional offices, then we
dont even have to provide for it, we can remove it altogether. But
your interpretation is more sound, actually, more rational and
reasonable. And I do not know now where to place that in relation to
what has been told us by OPAPP, GRP and MILF.
46
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 4
Kindly help us sort through it, Mr. Chief Justice, or Secretary De
Jesus.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Well, before we enter into
the discussion, because time is an element here, I think maliwanag na
between the members of the Committee that we find ourselves now in
that quandary, what is the context in which we apply the
recommendations that are being made.
At least sang-ayon ako kay Senator Escudero na iyong mga
suggestion ninyo, lalo na sa constitutionality, dahil ang amin laging
naririnig noon galing sa OPAPP, galing sa MILF, galing sa executive
department ay kahit isang tuldok ay hindi dapat palitan doon sa draft
BBL. Ngayon, sa inyo nanggagaling ang mga rekomendasyon na mga
pagbabago, mga amendment. That is why we are now presented with
very, as I said, fundamental and significant differences between the
interpretation of the Peace Council and of those who were involved in
writing the draft BBL.
So that is the situation we find ourselves in. And you will have
to help us as we go along this process kung papaano nga natin
ireresolba iyang ganyang klaseng sitwasyon.
47
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 5
So as I said, before we enter into the lengthy discussion on this,
unless you would like to respond, I would suggest we move on to the
next cluster.
MR. DAVIDE. Yes, very briefly.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Yes, of course.
MR. DAVIDE. I might lose track along the way later on if I have
to wait.
First, the BBL was never taken into consideration during the
1986 Concom. Its very obvious. But we talked already about
autonomous regions and, therefore, it can be made applicable to any
other organic act. So, in short, the constitutional basis for the BBL is
that particular provision on the Autonomous Region. So only the
principles there must guide us.
Secondly, the Committee may have heard so many opinions
already; ours is only a little contribution. So in the end, the final
arbiter would be the Congress of the Philippines. And right now, we
commend to you our recommendation, subject to the collective
wisdom initially of the Committee and then later on of the Senate.
So... rare and distinct opportunity really to be able to hear many
sides and to come up later on with the best compromise that you can
have to attain the objectives of the BBL.
48
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 6
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Thank you, Chief, for that
explanation and clarification. I guess now
SEN. ESCUDERO. Mr. Chairman, forgive me, just a brief
rejoinder.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Yes.
SEN. ESCUDERO. Actually, Mr. Chief Justice, ang hinihiling ko
po paano ang gagawin namin para maging bahagi at parte ng pormal
na diskusyon maliban sa aktwal na pag-effect ng mga amendments na
sina-suggest ninyo? Kasi gaya nga ng sabi ko, mas maganda ho
kayong pakinggan kaysa iyong OPAPP at GRP. Tama ho iyong simula
ninyo kanina, iyong shalom bago kayo nagsimula.
How can we make as an integral part the comments of the peace
panel thus far made insofar as Congress interpretation or how the
courts will interpret this particular law that we will be passing upon,
either in its current form or in another form?
MR. DAVIDE. I am sure, Your Honors, that the Committee will
go into executive session and probably will take up article by article
the proposed BBL. And I think that would be the most appropriate
time when you can reflect on the various ideas coming from the
various sectors. In the end, what will come out really would be a basic
law which will not require even interpretation at once, a basic law that
49
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 7
will require only application. The interpretation will come later on if
there are some questions regarding constitutionality. But I think even
on a particular aspect of constitutionality, you have to apply the rule of
statutory construction. And it is only by showing up grave, clear,
certain unconstitutionality that it may be. If there is any doubt,
sustain the constitutionality.
THE CHAIRMAN (SEN. MARCOS). Actually, Chief, ideally, the
questions on constitutionality, we would have remedied by the time
the final version will be discussed and finally passed by the Senate. So
that is the process within which we are hoping to achieve that.
So, again, thank you for your presentation, Chief Justice Davide.
We now move on to the economy and patrimony cluster. And I
believe Secretary Paderanga will be the one who will make that
presentation.
So, Secretary, please proceed.
MR. PADERANGA. Thank you very much, Your Honor, Mr.
Chairman.
And good morning to all the members of the panel, my fellow
members.
And following the lead of Chief Justice Davide, let me greet you
all Assalamu Alaikum.
50
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES Jmbaisa VII-1 May 5, 2015 11:21 a.m. 8
I am representing Mr. Jaime Augusto Zobel de Ayala... /jmb
51
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 1
MR. PADERANGA. I am representing Mr. Jaime Augusto
Zobel de Ayala, Your Honors, who sends his regrets because he had to
be out of the country at this time.
During the part of the presentation, Your Honors, essentially,
many of the points will be put in a tabular manner for ease, for clarity
and also for economy.
In this study, the objective was to review drafts of the BBLs
Article XIII on economy and patrimony and to identify and discuss
potential issues that have arisen. The process was the review of
resource materials. Among others, the Bangsamoro Development
Plan, which actually turned out to be quite impressiveI say that as
former head of the planning agency of the governmentworking
papers and presentations from organizations such as the Philippine
Center for Islam and Democracy (PCID) and the Foundation for
Economic Freedom (FEF).
The cluster also consulted key resource persons. So in the end,
the discussion group actually was relatively highly qualified and also a
bit large with contributions from everybody, Your Honors.
The first, there were some key observations that we thought
might be important to remember. One, the majority of the potential
economy and patrimony related issues related to the BBL are not
52
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 2 major and may be resolved by further clarification as the BBL is
written.
Second, devolution of laws is actually already happening. In
other words, some of the issues that have been raised are essentially
non-issues because these are already being done under present laws
and that could probably become clear as we go along.
Third, peace and order. Security is the key issue of potential
contention, these provisions.
And finally, Your Honors, the cluster deemed it important to
mention that the BBL is an opportunity to have a historic change rather
than a problem.
The review of the relevant plenary discussions, Your Honors.
First, the private sector is keenly watching how BBL and the eventual
establishment of the Bangsamoro government will affect the
investment environment and economic growth of the region. In the
meetings on Bangsamoro that was organized essentially, Your Honors,
by the FEF and the Philippine Center for Islam and Democracy, the
private sector were very strong participants of the meetings showing
their intense interest on how they could participate in the development
of this particular region.
53
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 3
Second, opportunities in the Bangsamoro should be highlighted
not only for the business sector but also for consumers, all of them
including Muslims, Christians and Lumads alike. It is also useful to
underscore positive aspects of having a Bangsamoro government. For
example, the attraction of new marketsASEAN as in majority Islamic
market including also the Middle Eastern countries. If, in fact, there is
very strong Bangsamoro presentation, then, in fact, these markets
would become much more open to Philippine products. And I think
with partnership between national government and Bangsamoro
government, the economic identity of us joining markets like this will
actually be highlighted.
The Bangsamoro government could be a model for ASEAN on
regional autonomy especially for countries like Thailand and Myanmar
where there are also significant minorities, in fact, Muslim minorities,
both of whom are facing similar secessionist challenges.
The Bangsamoro region creates possibility of exploitation and the
mitigation of inequitable distribution of economic benefits. Social
justice may be a useful guiding principle of BBL in relation to the
natural resource management especially in areas under stewardship by
marginalized groups.
54
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 4
The belief of the cluster, in fact, Your Honors, is that there might
actually be principles that are inherent or in the essence of Philippine
ethnic groupings that are actually quite attuned to the natural resource
endowments of this country.
Proper stewardship of environment with social justice hinges on
governance and leadership of future Bangsamoro government. BBL
presents the opportunity to do it right from the start with help, of
course, potentially from the business sector. This may include the
right of common good under concurrent powers, Article V, Section 2,
along with inter-generational responsibility to care for the
environment.
Investments will still have its own set of risks which is true for all
investments and not necessarily attributable to BBL.
We present in tabular form, Your Honors, some of the potential
issues and the consensus views of the cluster during the discussions.
First, on natural resources. The Bangsamoro government will
have the exclusive powers on ancestral domain and natural resources
including mining. How will this affect the private sectors ability to
invest in related sectors? It turns out, upon discussion with some of
the people who knew this, that devolution is already happening. For
55
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 5 example, certain DENR authorities are already devolved to local
governments including the ARMM.
Second issue, labor matters. The Bangsamoro government may
organize its own social security and pension systems and enact new
laws on labor and employment applicable only in Bangsamoro thereby
creating uncertainty for businesses.
The cluster view, Your Honors, was that ARMM-DOLE already has
a degree of independence but actually needs clarity on how deviations
may be legislated by Bangsamoro. Any wage disparities between the
Bangsamoro region and the rest of the country actually will be
managed by the local wage boards in coordination with relevant
national agencies. In other words, Your Honors, there are actually
already regional wage boards that are present all over the country.
Third issue is land transfer. Land registration will be aligned with
central government but land acquisitions and transfers shall be
governed by the Bangsamoro government and may or may not be
consistent with the rest of the country.
The cluster view is that the land titles already registered under
the national system will be honored by the Bangsamoro government as
well. There may even be an opportunity to streamline land
56
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES GESapinoso I-2 May 5, 2015 11:31 a.m. 6 management and administration in Bangsamoro which if found to be
quite useful, may actually be replicated in other areas.
As it turns out, Your Honor, it seems that there are actually
several authorities and several layers where there is potential
overlapping but the reorganization of the government that may come
out may actually give us the opportunity to streamline the process.
Four, in customs and tariff. Enforcement of customs and tariff
laws to be done through intergovernmental relations mechanism
between the Bangsamoro and central governments. The fear has been
that this may promote more smuggling in the region. This may require
more clarification on the manner of enforcement.
On the other hand, Your Honors, ASEAN tariffs are already at
zero except for rice, sugar and a few other items. Smuggling to avoid
VAT is a temptation but is not unique.../jun
57
COMMITTEE ON LOCAL GOVERNMENT JOINT WITH THE COMMITTEES ON PEACE, UNIFICATION AND RECONCILIATION; AND CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS AND REVISION OF CODES CDAstrero II-2 May 5, 2015 11:41 a.m. 1
MR. PADERANGA. but is not unique to the Bangsamoro
region. VAT impact for imported goods for resale may actually be
quite limited.
On infrastructure. Its not clear whether central governments
infrastructure development programs, for example the PPP program,
will apply to Bangsamoro. Infrastructure investors may need more
clarity on this. This, I think, was expressed by the private sector
representatives. The cluster view, Your Honor, was that BDA, the
Bangsamoro Development Authority, which is their equivalent of the
Nat