1
BCIA Webinar
Fred Shaffer, PhD, BCBTruman State University, Center for Applied [email protected]
How to Increase the Effectiveness of Your HRV Biofeedback Practice
I want to recognize the contributions of several amazing colleagues: Dick Gevirtz, PhD, BCB, Paul Lehrer, PhD, BCB, Donald Moss, PhD, BCB, BCN, and Erik Peper, PhD.
Credit
2
Inna Khazan, PhD, BCB, David Hagedorn, PhD, BCN, and Rollin McCraty, PhD.
Credit
Thanks to Inna Khazan, the Institute of HeartMath, J & J Engineering, Mind Media,and Thought Technology Ltd., for graphics and adapted figures used in this presentation.
Credit
3
Thanks to the undergraduates who staff Truman State University’s Center for Applied Psychophysiology.
Credit
Finally, thanks to Lab Managers Christopher Zerr (2011‐2015) and Zachary Meehan (2016).
Credit
4
1. Attendees will be able to explain how to measure a client’s resonance frequency.
2. Attendees will be able to choose between competing breathing rates and inhalation‐to‐exhalation ratios.
3. Attendees will be able to describe how to structure training sessions to increase heart rate variability.
Educational Objectives
4. Attendees will be able to assess client progress during training.
5. Attendees will be able to evaluate the experimental support for popular HRVB applications.
Educational Objectives
5
1. How to measure the resonance frequency
2. How to structure an HRVB training session
3. Clinical efficacy of HRV biofeedback
Webinar Units
Unit 1: How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
6
Resonance
Lehrer and colleagues (2004) proposed that each individual’s cardiovascular system has a unique resonance frequency, which is caused by the delay in the baroreflex. Inertia in the blood supply accounts for most of this delay.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Taller people and men have lower resonance frequencies than women and shorter people, because the former have larger blood volumes.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
7
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
When clients breathe at their resonance frequency, heart rate and respiration are in perfect phase (0o); their peaks and valleys coincide.
In adults, this frequency varies from 4.5‐6.5 breaths per minute (Gevirtz, Lehrer, & Schwartz, 2016).
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
8
When clients breathe at this rate, they “exercise” the baroreflex.
Resonance frequency (RF) breathing amplifies the swings in heart rate produced by the baroreflex, increasing baroreflex gain and respiratory sinus arrhythmia.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Increased RSA with RF breathing from Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016)
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
9
RF breathing also modulates blood pressure changes since heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) oscillations are 180o out of phase (DeBoer, Karemaker, & Strackee, 1987; Vaschillo et al., 2002).
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
RF breathing shifts the peak frequency from the high frequency band (~0.20 Hz) to thecardiovascular system’s resonance frequency (~0.10 Hz).
RF breathing more than doubles the energy in the low frequency band of the ECG (0.04‐0.15 Hz).
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
10
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
To find the breathing rate that maximizes the baroreflex, instruct your client to breathe at each target rate using a pacer for 3 min followed by a 1‐min buffer period.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
11
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
This allows you to delete 1 min of bad data from the start or end of your trial and still have the 2 min required to calculate peak‐to‐trough differences (HR Max – HR Min).
Always visually inspect your data for artifact and don’t be misled by summary statistics.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
For adults, start at 7.5 bpm and continue in descending 0.5 bpm steps to 4.5 bpm, regardless of your client’s height.
Consider 9.5 to 6.5 breaths per min for children.
12
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Since most adults breathe between 12‐16 breaths per min (Fried, 1990), slower breathing may be difficult for some clients. This can be especially true for chronic pain patients, who may breathe faster than 16 bpm.
After each trial, confirm that your client breathed at the required rate and repeat trials where they were 0.25 bpm too fast or slow.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
13
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
1. Record breathing at each respiration rate as a separate 3‐min epoch.
2. Take a single screenshot of respirometer and instantaneous HR signals for each trial.
3. Measure HR Max – HR Min, absolute and % LF power, phase angle (of the peaks of the HR and respirometer tracings), and EKG peak frequency mean for each trial.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
You can use screenshots of each epoch to visually evaluate synchrony. SnagIt by TechSmith is a powerful utility. Paste the screenshots into PowerPoint and then advance through the slides to see changes in phase.
14
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Lehrer et al. (2013) developed this protocol, which we have adapted.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Didier Combatalade, Director of Clinical Interface at Thought Technology Ltd., provided invaluable technical support in measuring the phase relationship between respirometer and heart rate signals using BioGraph Infiniti software.
15
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Christopher Zerr, former Lab Manager for the Truman Center for Applied Psychophysiology,provided technical support and supervised data collection to illustrate this protocol.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
The resonance frequency is the breathing rate that satisfies the majority of these parameters:1. synchrony of the respirometer and heart rate
signals2. largest peak‐to‐trough HR differences (HR Max
– HR Min)3. largest absolute and percentage LF power,
and highest LF peak frequency near 0.1 Hz4. smoothest and most regular heart rate
waveforms
16
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Peaks of the respirometer and HR signals coincide (0 degrees is best)
Largest HR Max – HR Min
Largest absolute and % LF power, and highest LF peak frequency near 0.1 Hz
Smoothest and most regular HR signals
Resonance Frequency
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 7.5
17
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 7.0
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 6.5
18
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 6.0
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 5.5
19
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 5.0
Finding the Resonance Frequency: 4.5
20
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Using the Lehrer et al. (2013) criteria, we could choose a respiration rate of 5.5 bpm due to its synchrony (7 o), peak‐to‐trough difference (49 bpm), and peak frequency (0.09 Hz).
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
RR Phase Max-Min LF % Peak SDRR Temp SCL Systolic Diastolic
7.5 25 0 40 83 0.13 122 97 14 103 61
7.0 22 0 38 94 0.11 128 96 14 118 65
6.5 27 0 43 93 0.11 158 96 15 133 56
6.0 13 0 46 95 0.09 154 96 15 106 73
5.5 7 0 49 90 0.09 181 96 16 116 70
5.0 -30 0 53 94 0.08 188 96 19 107 58
4.5 -32 0 51 94 0.08 192 96 20 101 72
21
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Which breathing rate should you choose if there are two possible resonance frequencies?
Choose the rate that your client prefers.
How to Measure the Resonance Frequency
Resonance frequency measurements using this protocol have a 2‐week test‐retest reliability of 0.73 (Wally et al., 2011).
22
Unit 2: How to Structure an HRV Biofeedback Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
The aim of heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) is to exercise the baroreceptor reflex to enhance homeostatic regulation, improve executive functions, and increase awareness of how a more balanced inner state feels.
23
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
The overarching purpose of HRVB training is to improve your client's ability to self‐regulate and to enhance health, the quality of life, and performance.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Successful HRVB training integrates mindfulness, emotional self‐regulation, and resonance frequency breathing.
24
Resonance Frequency Breathing
MindfulnessEmotional
Self‐Regulation
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Mindfulness involves "paying attention in a particular way: on purpose, in the present moment, and nonjudgmentally" (Kabat‐Zinn, 1994).
25
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Mindfulness guides the trial‐and‐error process underlying self‐regulation by helping clients to draw connections between their actions, internal feedback, and results.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Clients discover their unique psychophysiological response patterns and learn which strategies help them to increase HRV.
26
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Emotional self‐regulation involves the self‐monitoring, initiation, maintenance, and modulation of positive and negative emotions, and the avoidance and reduction of high levels of negative affect (Bridges, Denham, & Ganiban, 2004).
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Finally, resonance frequency breathing involves effortless breathing at an individual's unique resonance frequency, which varies in adults from 4.5‐6.5 breaths per min, to exercise the baroreceptor reflex.
27
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Lehrer et al. (2013) recommend inhaling through the nose and exhaling through pursed lips, since this moistens and heats inhaled air, and enhances sensory feedback.
Which inhalation‐to‐exhalation ratio is best?
Since Zerr et al. (2015) and Meehan et al. (manuscript in preparation) found no advantage for a 1:2 versus a 1:1 inhalation‐to‐exhalation ratio on any time domain or frequency domain HRV measure, you might follow your client's preference.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
28
Should you encourage your client to increase abdominal excursion?
Abdominal excursion is the degree of respirometer movement from inhalation to exhalation.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Meehan et al. (manuscript in preparation) found that increasing abdominal excursion resulted in significantly greater HR Max – HR Min, SDNN, and pNN50 values in 36 undergraduates aged 19‐26.
The effect sizes, which ranged from 0.34‐0.36 were large.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
29
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Allow your client to effortlessly increase the expansion and contraction of the abdomen, since this may increase heart rate variability.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
30
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Consider starting with HRVB before other modalities, since it can significantly raise hand temperature (4o F/2.2oC) and lower SCL (3.5 μS) (Zerr et al., 2014).
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HRVB TEMPB
Temperature Change
Session 1 Session 4
31
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
HRVB TEMPB
Skin Conductance Level Change
Session 1 Session 4
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Gevirtz has suggested using hand temperature as an HRV home practice outcome index.
32
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Date Time Exercise Length Start Temp
End Temp
How Did You Feel?
What Did You Learn?
5-10-2016
noon RF breathing
15 81o 83o Calm with greater awareness of my body
I breathe in my chest more than I realized
5-11-2016
noon InnerBalance
20 82o 84o Less stressed My heart rhythm becomes more regular when I reduce my effort
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Consider using SD1, the standard deviation of the distance of each point from the y = x axis of a Poincaré (pwaⁿ‐ˌkä‐ˈrā) plot, to assess your clients. You can calculate this index using Kubios2.2 software.
33
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
SD1, which is measured in ms, predicted diastolic blood pressure, HR Max – HR Min, RMSSD, pNN50, and SDNN in healthy undergraduates (Zerr et al., 2015).
Clinical tips when you start HRV training:1. Model effortless breathing and positive
emotion for your client throughout eachsession.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
34
2. The warmth and supportiveness of your relationship with your client is the foundation for successful biofeedback training (Taub &School, 1978).
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
From a polyvagal theory perspective, it creates a safe environment in which your client can practice alternatives to fight‐or‐flight, freezing, or parasympathetic withdrawal.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
35
3. For clinical work, consider an ECG sensoron the wrist or a PPG sensor on an earlobeor finger.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
ECG wrist placement
36
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Photoplethysmograph (PPG) sensor
8. Provide HRV biofeedback displays of respirometer movement and instantaneous heart rate.
Analog displays can provide your client with incredibly detailed and intuitive information.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
37
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
38
4. While client preference should guide your selection of feedback displays, you might try feedback of low frequency power and peak‐to‐trough differences first.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
The concentration of signal power around 0.1 Hz in the LF band corresponds to Institute of HeartMath's concept of coherence, in which a client produces a "narrow, high‐amplitude, easily visualized peak" from 0.09‐0.14 Hz (Ginsberg, Berry, & Powell, 2010, p. 54; McCraty et al., 2009).
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
39
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
40
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
41
Which HRV Measures Should You Display?
Meehan et al. (manuscript in preparation) found that low frequency power and peak‐to‐trough differenceswere the best predictors of SDNN and RMSSD in our undergraduates during HRVB training.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Low frequency (LF) power is the amount of HRV signal energy in the 0.04‐0.15 Hz range.
Peak‐to‐trough differences are the mean heart rate differences across breathing cycles, and are indexed by HR Max – HR Min.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
42
SDNN is the standard deviation of the normal (NN) sinus‐initiated IBIs measured in ms.
RMSSD is the square root of the mean squared difference of adjacent NN intervals.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
LF power and peak‐to‐trough differences accounted for 82% and 67% of the variability in SDNN, respectively, during HRVB training.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
43
LF power and peak‐to‐trough differences accounted for 89% and 67% of the variability in RMSSD, respectively, during HRVB training.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Neither the phase relationship between the peaks of the ECG and respiration waveforms nor the peak ECG frequency (e.g., 0.9 Hz) predicted these time domain measures when subjects breathed around 6 bpm.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
44
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
PredictedPeak‐to‐Trough
LF Power Absolute Phase
Peak Frequency
SDNN 67% 82% NS NS
RMSSD 67% 89% NS NS
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
45
5. While it did not predict SDNN or RMSSD, in our undergraduates because they werealready breathing around 6 bpm, some clients may prefer a display of the synchrony between respirometer and instantaneous heart rate signals.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
46
6. Once your client has mastered resonance frequency breathing, games can motivatepractice and speed skill acquisition.
Well‐designed software suites allow clients to increase the level of game difficulty, which is crucial for transferring resonance frequency breathing to everyday life.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
47
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
48
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
7. Emotional self‐regulation, using strategies like activating feelings of appreciation, may help to “immunize” clients against the disruptive effects of increased challenge, frustration, and distress, and speed recovery from stressors.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
49
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Resonance frequency breathing
Exercises the baroreflex
Increases HRV and executive
functions
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Emotional self‐regulation
Increases resilience and quality of life
May protect HRV
50
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Each session might be structured as follows:1. 5‐min discussion of practice and progress
during sensor attachment2. 3‐min baseline (no feedback)
3. six 3‐min HRV biofeedback segments,each followed by coaching
4. 3‐min baseline (no feedback)
5. assignment of practice
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Introduction “Heart rate variability training depends on your: 1. adopting a passive attitude, where you allow
yourself to breathe,
2. breathing with about 70% of your maximum effort, and
3. gradually slowing your breathing to around 6 breaths per minute.”
51
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
“The computer can help you learn slow effortless breathing. The pink tracing shows your heart rate, while the violet tracing shows the movement of the sensor around your stomach.
As you gradually learn to breathe effortlessly, the two tracings should resemble smooth, repeating, ocean waves.”
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
52
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
“Since no one should expect to instantly breathe at 6 breaths per minute, we will start your pacer, which located is at the top of the screen, at 12 breaths per minute. Let it guide your inhalation and exhalation.
Allow your stomach to gradually plop out as you inhale and then slowly draw inward as you exhale. As you practice, we will adjust the speed of the pacing display.”
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Start recording data for 3 min. At the end of the training segment ask:
”How was the speed of the pacing display? Should we change it? Should we adjust the inhalation and exhalation lengths?
What did you experience as you practiced breathing effortlessly?”
53
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Training success indicators:1. breathing followed the pacing display2. the two signals were rhythmic and regular3. signal peaks and valleys coincided4. signal energy increased within the low
frequency band, centered around 0.1 Hz
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Training difficulty indicators:1. your client could not follow the pacing display2. the two signals were irregular3. signal peaks and valleys were out of phase4. your client used excessive effort 5. signal energy increased in the very low
frequency or high frequency bands6. your client displayed dysfunctional breathing
54
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Training segment reviewFit the entire 3‐min segment on the screen to review it together. If your client succeeded, you might point out where she succeeded:1. breathing slowed down towards her resonance
frequency
2. the tracings became more like ocean waves
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
3. the peaks and valleys of the two tracings came closer together
4. the accessory muscles remained relaxed
55
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Before starting the next segment, you might ask:“What were you doing when the display became wavelike and regular?” “What happened when the display became more jagged and irregular?”
If accessory SEMG exceeded 2 microvolts, point this out on the display, ask her if she felt the heightened breathing effort, and encourage her to “let her shoulders relax and allow herself to breathe.”
56
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
If your client experienced difficulty, find a portion of the 3‐min segment where breathing was better and focus on what she did correctly.
You might ask “What were you doing when the display became wavelike and regular?” “What happened when the display became more jagged and irregular?”
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Reassure her that it’s normal for the tracings to be choppy when people start training and that they will gradually become more wavelike as their breathing becomes more rhythmic and regular.
57
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Instead of overwhelming her with corrections, ask her to experiment with just one change.
For example, “Effortless breathing is rhythmic like ocean waves. Allow your abdomen to gently expand and contract as you follow the pacing display.”
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Display entire 3‐min segment on one screen
Highlight what your client did
correctly
Suggest one improvement
58
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Session review After your client has completed six 3‐min training segments, take a 3‐min post‐baseline without feedback.
After the post‐baseline, ask your client how she felt and what she learned during the training session. Display the entire session on one screen and highlight where she succeeded and where she needs more work.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Display the entire session
Highlight what your client did
correctly
Identify where she needs more work
59
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
How many heart rate variability biofeedback sessions are required?
Many clients start to breathe more effortlessly and increase HRV during their initial training session.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
There can be a several‐week lag between increased HRV and improved health or performance.
Clients require this time to consolidate their learning and transfer enhanced skills to the diverse settings of their lives.
60
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Practice is the bridge between the clinic and everyday life.
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Clients may require more than 10 sessions and corresponding weeks of practice to achieve maximum psychological, physiological, and performance gains (Gevirtz, Lehrer, & Schwartz, 2016; Lagos et al., 2011).
61
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
Psychophysiological Change
Improved Health and Performance
Generalization and Maintenance
1‐10+ sessions 2‐6+ months
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
The most important HRV training elements:1. education about the purpose, benefits, and
process of HRV biofeedback
2. correction of breathing mechanics andmodeling the breathing pattern and positive emotion that you want your client to learn
3. warm and supportive relationship with yourclient
62
How to Structure a HRVB Training Session
4. gradual shaping of your client’s respiration rate towards her resonance frequency
5. daily practice of HRVB skills for 20 min
Glossary
63
absolute power: the magnitude of HRV within a frequency band measured in milliseconds squared divided by cycles per second (ms2/Hz).
approximate entropy (ApEn): nonlinear index of HRV that measures the regularity and complexity of a time series.
baroreflex: baroreceptor reflex that provides negative feedback control of blood pressure. Elevated blood pressure activates the baroreflex to lower blood pressure and low blood pressure suppresses the baroreflex to raise blood pressure.
blood volume pulse (BVP): the phasic change in blood volume with each heartbeat. It is the vertical distance between the minimum value (trough) of one pulse wave and the maximum value (peak) of the next measured using a photoplethysmograph (PPG).
detrended fluctuation analysis (DFA): nonlinear index of HRV that extracts the correlations between successive R‐R intervals over different time scales and yields estimates of short‐term (α1) and long‐term (α2) fluctuations.
Glossary
electrocardiogram (ECG): recording of the electrical activity of the heart using an electrocardiograph.
frequency domain measures of HRV: calculation of the absolute or relative power of the HRV signal within four frequency bands.
high frequency (HF) band: ECG frequency range from 0.15‐.40 Hz that represents the Inhibition and activation of the vagus nerves by breathing (respiratory sinus arrhythmia).
HR Max – HR Min: index of heart rate variability that calculates the difference between the highest and lowest heart rates during each respiratory cycle.
HRV triangular index: geometric measure based on 24‐hour recordings that divides the number of NN intervals by the number of NN intervals found within the modal 8‐millisecond bin.
interbeat interval (IBI): the time interval between the peaks of successive R‐spikes (initial upward deflections in the QRS complex). This is also called the NN (normal‐ to‐normal) interval.
Glossary
64
low frequency (LF) band: ECG frequency range of 0.04‐0.15 Hz that may represent the influence of PNS, SNS, and baroreflex activity (when breathing at resonance frequency).
NN interval: the normal‐to‐normal interval is an interbeat interval after artifact has been removed.
NN50: the number of adjacent NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 milliseconds.
nonlinear measurements: indices that quantify the unpredictability of a time series, which results from the complexity of the mechanisms that regulate the measured variable.
parasympathetic vagus (X) nerves: cranial nerves that arise from the medulla’s cardiovascular center, decrease the rate of spontaneous depolarization in SA and AV nodes, and slow the heart rate from the SA nodes intrinsic rate of 100 beats per minute.
photoplethysmograph (PPG): device that measures the relative amount of blood flow through tissue using a photoelectric transducer.
Glossary
pNN50: the percentage of adjacent NN intervals that differ from each other by more than 50 milliseconds.
quantitative EEG (QEEG): digitized statistical brain mapping using at least a 19‐channel montage to measure EEG amplitude within specific frequency bins.
relative power: the percentage of total HRV.
resonance frequency: frequency at which a system, like the cardiovascular system, can be activated or stimulated.
respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA): respiration‐driven heart rhythm that contributes to the high frequency (HF) component of heart rate variability. Inhalation inhibits vagal nerve slowing of the heart (increasing heart rate), while exhalation restores vagal slowing (decreasing heart rate).
R‐spike: initial upward deflection in the QRS complex of the ECG.
RMSSD: the square root of the mean squared difference of adjacent NN intervals.
Glossary
65
S: nonlinear index of HRV that measures the area of the ellipse, which represents total HRV.
sample entropy (SampEn): nonlinear index of HRV that was designed to provide a less biased measure of signal regularity and complexity than ApEn.
SD1: the standard deviation of the distance of each point from the y = x axis that measures short‐term HRV.
SD2: the standard deviation of each point from the y = x + average RR interval that measures short‐ and long‐term HRV.
SD1/SD2: ratio that measures the unpredictability of the R‐R time series and autonomic balance under appropriate monitoring conditions.
SDANN: the standard deviation of the average NN intervals. This index is usually calculated over 5 minutes.
Glossary
SDNN: the standard deviation of the interbeat interval measured in milliseconds, which predicts both morbidity and mortality.
SDNN index: the average of 5‐minute standard deviations of NN intervals across a 24‐hour period that measures the contribution of rhythms briefer than 5 minutes to heart rate variability.
SDRR: the standard deviation of the interbeat interval for all sinus beats measured in milliseconds, which predicts both morbidity and mortality.
spectral analysis: division of heart rate variability into its component rhythms that operate within different frequency bands.
ultra low frequency (ULF) band: ECG frequency range below 0.003 Hz Very slow biological processes that include circadian rhythms, core body temperature, metabolism, and the renin‐angiotensin system, and possible PNS and SNS contributions.
Glossary
66
very low frequency (VLF): ECG frequency range of 0.003‐0.04 Hz that may represent temperature regulation, plasma renin fluctuations, endothelial, and physical activity influences, cardiac afferent sensory neuron stimulation, and possible PNS and SNS contributions.
Glossary
Recommended Reading and References
67
Recommended Reading
www.aapb.org
Lehrer, P. M., & Gevirtz, R. (2014). Heart rate variability: How and why does it work?Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00756
McCraty, R., & Shaffer, F. (2015). Heart rate variability: New perspectives on physiological mechanisms, assessment of self‐regulatory capacity, and health risk. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 4(1), 46‐61. doi:10.7453/gahmj.2014.073
Shaffer, F., McCraty, R., & Zerr, C. L. (2014). A healthy heart is not a metronome: An integrative review of the heart’s anatomy and heart rate variability. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01040
Recommended Reading
68
Berntson, G. G., Quigley, K. S., & Lozano, D. (2007). Cardiovascular psychophysiology. In J. T. Cacioppo, L. G. Tassinary, & G. G. Berntson, (Eds.). Handbook of psychophysiology (3rd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bridges, L. J., Denham, S. A., & Ganiban, J. M. (2004). Definitional issues in emotion regulation research. Child Development, 75(2), 340‐345.
Fuller, J., Wally, C., Westermann‐Long, Korenfeld, D., & Carrell, D. (2011). Resonance frequency measurements are reliable [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36, 219.
Gevirtz, R. N., Lehrer, P. M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Cardiorespiratory biofeedback. In M.S. Schwartz & F. Andrasik (Eds.). Biofeedback: A practitioner’s guide (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Gilbert, C. (2012). Pulse oximetry and breathing training. Biofeedback, 40(4), 137‐141.
Ginsberg, J. P., Berry, M. E., & Powell, D. A. (2010). Alternative Therapies, 16(4), 52‐60.
References
Hagedorn, D. (2014). Infection risk mitigation for biofeedback providers. Biofeedback, 42(3), 93‐95.
Kabat‐Zinn, J. (1994). Wherever you go, there you are: Mindfulness mediation in everyday life. New York: Hyperion Books.
Lagos, L., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Lehrer, P., Bates, M., & Pandina, R. (2011). Virtual reality assisted heart rate variability biofeedback as a strategy to improve golf performance: A case study. Biofeedback, 39(1), 15‐20.
Lehrer, P., Vaschillo, B., Zucker, T., Graves, J., Katsamanis, M., Aviles, M., & Wamboldt, F. (2013). Protocol for heart rate variability biofeedback training. Biofeedback, 41, 98–109. doi: 10.5298/1081‐5937‐41.3.08
Lehrer, P. M. (2007). Biofeedback training to increase heart rate variability. In P. M. Lehrer, R. M. Woolfolk, & W. E. Sime (Eds.). Principles and practice of stress management (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
References
69
Lehrer, P. M. (2013). How does heart rate variability biofeedback work? Resonance, the baroreflex, and other mechanisms. Biofeedback, 41(1), 26‐31.
Lehrer, P. M., & Vaschillo, E. (2008). The future of heart rate variability biofeedback. Biofeedback, 36(1), 11‐14.
Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., & Vaschillo, B. (2000). Resonant frequency biofeedback training to increase cardiac variability: Rationale and manual for training. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 25(3), 177‐191.
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Tiller, W. A. (1995). The effects of emotion on short term heart rate variability using power spectrum analysis. American Journal of Cardiology, 76.
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Tomasino, D, & Bradley, R. T. (2006). The coherent heart. Boulder Creek, CA: Institute of HeartMath.
McCraty, R., Atkinson M, Tomasino, D., & Bradley, R. T. (2009). The coherent heart: Heart‐brain interactions, psychophysiological coherence, and the emergence of system‐wide order. Integral Review, 5(2), 10‐115.
References
Nunan, D., Sandercock, G. R. H., & Brodie, D. A. (2010). A quantitative systematic review of normal values for short‐term heart rate variability in healthy adults. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 33, 1407–1417.
Peper, E., Gibney, K. H., Tylova, H., Harvey, R., & Combatalade, D. (2008). Biofeedback mastery: An experiential teaching and self‐training manual. Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Shaffer, F., Mayhew, J. L., Bergman, S., Dougherty, J., Koester, A. (1999). Effortfulbreathing may lower end‐tidal CO2 through increased tidal volume [Abstract].Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 24(2), 124.
Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology (1996). Heart rate variability: Standards of measurement, physiological interpretation, and clinical use. Circulation, 93, 1043‐1065.
Taub, E., & School, P. J. (1978). Some methodological considerations in thermal biofeedback training. Behavior Research Methods & Instrumentation, 10(5), 617‐622.
References
70
Umetami, K., Singer, D. H., McCraty, R., & Atkinson, M. (1998). Twenty‐four hour time domain heart rate variability and heart rate: Relations to age and gender over nine decades. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 31(3), 593‐601.
Vaschillo, E., Lehrer, P., Rishe, N., & Konstantinov, M. (2002). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: A preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(1), 1‐27.
Zerr, C., Kane, A., Vodopest, T., Allen, J., Fluty, E., Gregory, J., . . . Shaffer, F. (2014). Heart rate variability norms for healthy undergraduates [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39, 300. doi:10.1007/s10484‐014‐9254‐9
Zerr, C., Kane, A., Vodopest, T., Allen, J., Fluty, E., Gregory, J., . . . Shaffer, F. (2014). HRV biofeedback training raises temperature and lowers skin conductance [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(3). doi: 10.1007/s10484‐014‐92549
References
Zerr, C., Kane, A., Vodopest, T., Allen, J., Hannan, J., Fabbri, M., . . . Shaffer, F. (2015). Does inhalation‐to‐exhalation ratio matter in heart rate variability biofeedback? [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 40(2), 135. doi:10.1007/s10484‐015‐9282‐0
Zerr, C., Kane, A., Vodopest, T., Allen, J., Hannan, J., Fabbri, M., . . . Shaffer, F. (2015).The nonlinear index SD1 predicts diastolic blood pressure and HRV time and frequency domain measurements in healthy undergraduates [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 40(2), 134. doi:10.1007/s10484‐015‐9282‐0
References
71
Unit 3: HRV Biofeedback Applications
Credit
I want to recognize the contributions of Dick Gevirtz, PhD, BCB, Donald Moss, PhD, BCB, BCN, and Angele McGrady, PhD, LPC, BCB, to this presentation.
72
Credit
McGrady and Moss’ (2013) Pathways to Illness, Pathways to Health was an invaluable resource for this presentation.
The Clinical Efficacy of Established Medical Practices
Prasad et al. (2013) examined 363 studies of an accepted drug or medical procedure published in The New England Journal of Medicine from 2001 to 2010.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
73
How efficacious were they?
More than 40% were ineffective or harmful, 38% were beneficial, and 22% had uncertain value.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Unknown value
Beneficial
Ineffective or harmful
Unknown value Beneficial Ineffective or harmful
Examples of ineffective or harmful practices included hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women and aggressive blood sugar reduction in Type 2 diabetics treated in intensive care, which increased mortality rates.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
74
The authors observed:
“Nevertheless, the reversals we have identified at the very least call these practices into question. Some practices ought to be abandoned, whereas others warrant retesting in more powerful investigations. One of the greatest virtues of medical research is our continual quest to reassess it.” (p. 796)
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Currie, Stabile, and Jones (2013) studied the educational outcomes and medication use of almost 4,000 children in Quebec from 1994‐2008. They evaluated the effect of increased drug insurance coverage, which was associated with a significant rise in Ritalin use.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
75
The authors reported:
“Overall, we find considerable evidence of a decline in both behavioral and educational outcomes following the increase in prescription drug coverage and the corresponding increase in Ritalin use. The effects are, in a number of cases, both statistically significant and large.” (p. 21)
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Criteria for Clinical Efficacy
The major membership organizations in our field have developed efficacy guidelines and have engaged in an ongoing assessment of clinical and optimal performance practices.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
76
The third edition of Evidence‐Based Practice in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback is now available. This reference was preceded by literature reviews of HRVB applications by Wheat and Larkin (2010) and Gevirtz (2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Guidelines for evaluating the clinical efficacy of biofeedback and neurofeedback interventions were recommended by a joint Task Force and adopted by the Boards of Directors of the Association for Applied Psychophysiology (AAPB) and the International Society for Neuronal Regulation (ISNR) (LaVaque et al., 2002).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
77
Tan, Shaffer, Lyle, and Teo (2016) evaluated a wide variety of biofeedback and neurofeedback applications using these guidelines in Evidence‐Based Practice in Biofeedback and Neurofeedback (3rd ed.).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Level 1: Not Empirically SupportedSupported only by anecdotal reports and/or case studies in non‐peer reviewed venues.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
78
Level 2: Possibly EfficaciousAt least one study of sufficient statistical power with well identified outcome measures, but lacking randomized assignment to a control condition internal to the study.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Level 3: Probably Efficacious Multiple observational studies, clinical studies, wait list controlled studies, and within subject and intrasubject replication studies that demonstrate efficacy.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
79
Level 4: EfficaciousIn a comparison with a no‐treatment control group, alternative treatment group, or sham (placebo) control utilizing randomized assignment, the investigational treatment is shown to be statistically significantly superior.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
The studies have been conducted with a population treated for a specific problem, for whom inclusion criteria are delineated in a reliable, operationally defined manner.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
80
The study used valid and clearly specified outcome measures related to the problem being treated.
The data are subjected to appropriate data analysis.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
The diagnostic and treatment variables and procedures are clearly defined in a manner that permits replication of the study by independent researchers.
The superiority or equivalence of the investigational treatment has been shown in at least two independent research settings.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
81
Part 1: Psychological DisordersAnxiety, PTSD, and Depression
Anxiety Disorders
HRVB is a potential treatment for anxiety, phobia, and post‐traumatic stress disorder.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
82
Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is defined by disproportionate anxiety and worry the majority of the time for at least 6 months (DSM‐V, 2013).
Chronic over‐arousal results in fatigue and insomnia, which can be worsened by changes in their circadian rhythm due to their job ortravel (McGrady & Moss, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Patients perceive their worrying as outside their control. They present with physical (muscle tension) and cognitive symptoms (belief that worrying can prevent a negative event).
They are usually diagnosed with a second disorder (Beidel, Bulik, & Stanley, 2014).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
83
Specific phobia involves significant emotional distress, excessive anxiety or fear about an object or situation, that disrupts everyday performance.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
DSM‐V lists five specifiers: animal phobias, natural environment phobias, blood/injection/ injury phobias, situational phobias, and other phobias (Beidel, Bulik, & Stanley, 2014).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
84
Post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a response to a traumatic event like assault, military combat, or rape that may be experienced firsthand or observed.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
PTSD is characterized by intrusion (patient re‐experiences the traumatic event), negative alterations in cognitions and mood (they cannot feel emotions like joy or sadness), hyperarousal, hypervigilance, an exaggerated startle response, and avoidance (evasion of stimuli linked to the trauma) (Beidel, Bulik, & Stanley, 2014).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
85
Biofeedback is efficacious for anxiety (Moss, 2016) and possibly efficacious for PTSD (Ginsberg et al., 2016).
Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016) theorized that GAD results from deficient vagal tone and ineffective inhibition.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
They also proposed that PTSD involves cortical overload, dominance of the unmyelinated vagus, and limbic plasticity that amplifies perception of threats.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
86
HRVB may produce clinical gains in these disorders by increasing vagal afferent nerve firing (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomeAnxiety Reiner (2008) Single group pilot study that
examined HRVB + CBT, N = 24HRVB + CBT reduced anxiety, anger, and sleep latency
McCraty et al. (2009)
RCT that compared HRVB + stress management vs. wait list control, N = 65
HRVB + stress management improved cholesterol, glucose, heart rate, blood pressure, positive outlook, and overall psychological distress
Henriques etal. (2011)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. delayed treatment, N = 35
HRVB reduced anxiety on MASQ subscales
CBT = Cognitive Behavior Therapy, MASQ = Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire
87
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomePhobia Prigatano
(1973)Case study that examined the effectiveness of HRVB on spider phobia
Patient reduced spider avoidance
CBT = Cognitive Behavior Therapy, MASQ = Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomePTSD Zucker et al.
(2009)RCT that compared HRVB using a StressEraser + 6 BPM breathing vs. progressive muscle relaxation CD, N = 38 residents treated for substance abuse disorders
Both groups reduced PTSD symptoms on the PTSD and Posttraumatic stress Checklist-Civilian version
HRV + 6 BPM breathing reduced BDI compared to PMR
Ginsberg et al. (2010)
Pre-post study that evaluatedHRVB for veterans with and without PTSD (N = 10)
HRVB resulted in better informationprocessing
Tan et al. (2010)
RCT that compared HRV + TAU vs. TAU, N = 30 veterans with PTSD.
HRV + TAU increased HRV and reduced PTSD symptoms on the CAPS and PCL-S, while TAU did not improve on any measure
Reyes (2014) Case study PTSD symptoms on PCL scale improved 21%
88
Depression
Major depressive disorder is diagnosed when five or more depressive symptoms, including sadness or loss of pleasure, are present for 2 weeks.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Depressed patients may sleep too much or too little, display psychomotor retardation or agitation, show change in weight or appetite, experience loss of energy, feel worthless or guilty, are unable to concentrate, think, or make decisions, and think repeatedly about death or suicide (DSM‐5, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
89
Multiple pathways to depression include polygenic, dysfunction involving the medial prefrontal cortex and limbic system, and environmental factors (McGrady & Moss, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Biofeedback is efficacious for depression (Shaffer & Zerr, 2016).
The effects may be mediated by the diaphragm's stimulation of vagal afferent nerves (Gevirtz, 2013).
This hypothesis is supported by findings that vagal nerve stimulation in some studies improved intractable depression.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
90
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomeDepression Karavidas et al.
(2007)Single group study with no control, N = 11 with major depression
50% reduction in depressivesymptoms with an effect size comparable to antidepressants
Zucker et al. (2009)
Controlled pilot study, N = 38 with PTSD symptoms; HRVB (Stress Eraser) + DBT vs. DBT + relaxation
HRVB group achieved lower depression scores
Siepmann et al. (2008)
Open-label controlled study, N = 38; HRVB vs. active control
Depressed patients in the HRVB reduced depression scores, while healthy subjects in this group and the control condition showed no change
Patron et al. (2013)
RCT, N = 26 with depressive symptoms following cardiac surgery; HRVB vs. TAU
HRVB was superior to TAU and improvement was correlated with increased RSA
DBT = Dialectical Behavior Therapy, RCT = randomized controlled trialTAU = treatment as usual
Part 2: Blood PressureHypertension, Prehypertension,Preeclampsia
91
Hypertension and Pre‐Hypertension
Hypertension (elevated blood pressure) is defined when systolic blood pressure is 140 mm Hg or higher and diastolic blood pressure is 90 mm Hg or higher.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
The NIH Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) treatment of high‐risk hypertensive patients 50 years or older to a systolic blood pressure of 120 mmHg reduced cardiovascular events by 30% and all‐cause mortality by almost 25%, compared to a target of 140 mmHg (Medscape, 2015).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
92
About 90% of all cases of hypertension are primary hypertension, which is chronically elevated blood pressure not due to an identifiable cause. The remaining 10% are classified as secondary hypertension, which has an identifiable cause (Marieb & Hoehn, 2012).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) advised that for adults over 50, systolic blood pressure is considerably greater risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD) than diastolic blood pressure.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
93
The NHLBI (2003) defined blood pressures between 120‐139 mmHg systolic and 80‐89 mmHg diastolic as prehypertensive.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Autonomic imbalance, involving sympathetic overactivity and parasympathetic underactivity, plays an important role in the development of essential hypertension.
Demographic factors (age, gender, and ethnicity) and psychological factors (depression, anger, and anxiety) influence blood pressure (McGrady & Moss, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
94
Biofeedback is efficacious for hypertension and prehypertension (McGrady, 2016).
Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016) proposed that labile hypertension is mediated by a deficient baroreflex.
Improvement may be mediated by restored autonomic balance and increased baroreceptor reflex sensitivity (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Device‐guided breathing is not empirically supported for hypertension (Zerr, Allen, & Shaffer, 2015).
A total of 10 randomized controlled studies were selected for analysis, which featured 573 hypertensive patients (56% male, average age of 56.6 years) training for an average of 7.7 weeks.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
95
Eight studies used a device known as RESPeRATE, while two used a Breathe with Interactive Music (BIM) device (both developed by InterCure Ltd., Israel).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Compared with controls, DGB resulted in non‐significant reductions with trivial effect sizes in both systolic (Cohen’s d = ‐0.12, SE = 0.09, z = ‐1.39, p = 0.16, 95% C.I. = ‐0.29 to 0.05) and diastolic (Cohen’s d = ‐0.16, SE = 0.09, z = ‐1.89, p = 0.06, 95% C.I. = ‐0.33 to 0.01) BP measures.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
96
Problem Study Design Outcome
Hypertension Elliott et al. (2004)
RCT that compared practice using a respiration device with conventional medical care, N = 149
15 mm Hg systolic reduction for slow breathing vs. 9 mm Hg reduction for control group after 8 weeks
Reinke et al. (2007)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. sham EEG attention control, N = 45
The HRVB group maintained blood pressure with less medication
Prehypertension Wang et al. (2009)
RCT that compared 0.1 Hz abdominal breathing + frontal SEMGB vs. 0.1 Hz breathing alone, N = 22 prehypertensive postmenopausal women
The combined group lowered SBP and DBP while the 0.1 Hz control only lowered SBP. The combined group lowered SBP more than the control group. SDNN significantly increased in both groups
Lin et al. (2012)
RCT that compared HRVB, slow abdominal breathing, and control, N = 43 prehypertensive young adults
The HRVB group reduced SBP and DBP more than the slowly abdominal breathing group. The HRVB group significantly increased BRS and SDNN
DBP = diastolic blood pressure, RCT = randomized controlled trial, SBP = systolic blood pressure, SEMGB = surface EMG biofeedback
Preeclampsia
Preeclampsia, also called pregnancy‐induced hypertension (PIH), is characterized by elevated blood pressure and proteinuria (abnormal levels of protein in the urine) following the 20th‐week of gestation.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
97
This disorder affects between 6‐8% of pregnancies and is one of the leading causes of fetal morbidity and mortality in the United States (Walling, 2004).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Preeclampsia is associated with the increased risk of acute renal failure, cerebrovascular and cardiovascular complications, separation of the placenta from the uterus, widespread formation of clots in small blood vessels, and maternal death (MacKay, Berg, & Atrash, 2001).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
98
While electrodermal biofeedback for preeclampsia is efficacious (Shaffer & Meehan, 2016), HRVB warrants a rating of possibly efficacious due to limited research.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design Outcome
Preeclampsia Cullin et al. (2013)
Nonrandom assignment in a multi-group study that compared bed rest, antihypertensive medication, and HRVB vs. historical control that included bed rest and antihypertensive medication, N = 47
No changes in DBP or SBP for either group. The HRVB group had fewer labor and delivery complications, and higher birth weight and gestational age than the TAU group.
DBP = diastolic blood pressure, SBP = systolic blood pressure,
99
Part 3: Cardiovascular DisordersCongestive Heart Failure Coronary Artery Disease
Cardiovascular Disorders
HRV biofeedback shows promise in congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
100
Congestive Heart Failure
Congestive heart failure involves dysfunction of the coronary ventricles or lower chambers.Failure of the left ventricle results in shortness of breath and fatigue, while failure in the right causes fluid to accumulate in the periphery and abdomen.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
101
Congestive heart failure involves dysfunction of one or both of the coronary ventricles or lower chambers.
Failure of the left ventricle results in shortness of breath and fatigue, while failure in the right causes fluid to accumulate in the periphery and abdomen.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Congestive heart failure is caused by cardiac factors, like myocardial damage, valvular disorders, arrhythmias, conduction defects, ischemia, and systemic factors, like disorders that increase CO2 demand and increase resistance to cardiac output (The Merck Manual, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
102
Coronary Artery Disease (CAD)
Coronary artery disease is characterized by reduced coronary artery circulation, whichis most often due to atheromas, deposits of lipid‐containing plaques on the inside lining of arteries.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
HRVB is possibly efficacious for congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease (Moravec & McKee, 2016).
There is increasing evidence that HRVB may improve cardiac function by restoring autonomic balance (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
103
This represents a paradigm shift from the earlier model of reducing SNS activation (Moravec & McKee, 2013).
Several studies have demonstrated the promise of HRVB in the treatment of congestive heart failure and coronary artery disease.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design Outcome
Congestive Heart failure
Swansonet al. (2009)
RCT that compared HRVB vs.quasi-false alpha-theta biofeedback, N = 29
Increased exercise tolerance for patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 30%; no change in SDNN or quality of life
Moravec(2008); Moravec & McKee (2013)
Case studies in which patients received HRVB with stress management
viability of harvested cardiac tissue was equivalent to changes produced by LVAD
Coronary Artery Disease
Cowan et al. (2001)
RCT that compared HRV biofeedback + CBT vs. TAU, N = 129 ventricular fibrillation or asystole survivors
HRVB+ CBT reduced mortality 86%
Del Pozo et al. (2004)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. TAU, N = 63
SDNN increased for HRVB group, but did not change in the TAU group
Nolan et al. (2005)
RCT that compared HRVB + CBT vs. relaxation, N = 46
While both groups improved stress and depression scores, only the HRVB group’s improvement was correlated with vagal tone
CBT = Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, LVAD = left ventricular assist device, RCT = randomized controlled trial, and TAU = treatment as usual
104
Part 4: Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Irritable Bowel Syndrome Recurrent Abdominal Pain
Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
Functional gastrointestinal disorders are diverse and diagnosed by their symptoms.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
105
These patients show heightened visceral pain receptor sensitivity, so normal contraction or distention of the stomach produces discomfort.
They also show increased sensitivity to stressors. This should be expected since the same pathways transmit information about visceral pain and stress (McGrady & Moss, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016) hypothesized that irritable bowel syndrome and recurrent abdominal pain are mediated by excessive sympathetic nervous system activity and extended parasympathetic withdrawal.
Gains from HRVB may be mediated by increased autonomic balance due to improved vagal tone (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
106
HRVB has been successfully used to treat cyclic vomiting, irritable bowel syndrome, and recurrent abdominal pain.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Cyclic Vomiting
Cyclic vomiting syndrome (CVS) is relatively rare and is characterized by severe episodes of vomiting or nausea that are separated by periods of healthy GI function. CVS is most often seen in children and remits by adulthood. Adult CVS is associated withchronic marijuana use (The Merck Manual, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
107
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS)
Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) involves stomach discomfort or pain associated with a minimum of two additional symptoms: relief by bowel movements or changes in stool frequency or consistency (The Merck Manual, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Recurrent Abdominal Pain (RAP)
Chronic abdominal pain (CAP) occurs either continuously or periodically for more than 3 months.
Intermittent CAP is termed recurrent abdominal pain (RAP) and is seen in up to 10% of children and 2% of adults, mostly women.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
108
Almost all of these patients were undiagnosed following previous assessment (The Merck Manual, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Biofeedback is efficacious for IBI (Stern et al., 2016) and possibly efficacious for recurrent abdominal pain (Guiles et al., 2016). HRVB is not empirically supported for cyclic vomiting due to limited research.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
109
Problem Study Design OutcomeCyclicvomiting
Slutsker et al. (2010)
Case study in which HRVB was used
Vomiting was greatly reduced
Irritablebowel syndrome (IBS)
Dobbin et al. (2013)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. hypnosis
The HRVB groups was superior at 12 weeks post-treatment. For 61 refractory patients, both groups showed comparable improvement at 24 weeks follow-up
Recurrentabdominal pain (RAP)
Humphreys & Gevirtz (2000)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. CBT and family therapy, N = 64 children and adolescents
HRV biofeedback alone produced the strongest outcomes
Masters (2006) Case study in which HRVB was integrated into other interventions
Symptom log ratings significantly improved
Sowder et al. (2010)
HRVB vs. control, N = 30(20 HRVB and 10 comparison without FAP)
Improvement of symptom ratings was correlated with reductions in LF/HF ratio used to measure vagal tone
CBT = Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, RCT = randomized controlled trial
Part 5: Pain Disorders
Chronic Muscle Pain andFibromyalgia
110
Chronic Muscle Pain
Chronic myofascial pain syndrome is a regional pain disorder that is characterized by trigger points, which are hyperirritable regions of taut bands of skeletal muscle in the muscle belly or associated fascia (connective tissue).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
111
Pressure on trigger points is painful. Trigger points can produce referred (remote) pain and tenderness, motor dysfunction, and autonomic changes.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Trigger points cannot be detected using SEMG electrodes, but can be identified using needle EMG electrodes and palpation (examination by feeling or pressing with the hand).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
112
Hubbard and Gevirtz have proposed that sympathetically‐mediated muscle spindle spasm may be the major local mechanism in myofascial pain.
An important implication of this theory is that muscle spindles may be activated by stress and anxiety.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Gevirtz's (2003) mediational model of muscle pain proposes that lack of assertiveness and resultant worry each trigger sympathetic activation.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
113
Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016) hypothesized that fibromyalgia is mediated by dopamine depletion in afferent limbic projections to the hippocampus and substance P depletion in nociceptive afferents that project to the the dorsal horn of the spinal cord.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Increased sympathetic efferent signals to muscle spindles and overexertion can produce a spasm in the intrafusal fibers of the muscle spindle, increasing muscle spindle capsule pressure and causing myofascial pain.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
114
Biofeedback is efficacious for chronic muscle pain (Sherman, Tan, & Wei, 2016).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomeChronic Muscle Pain
Hallman et al.(2011)
RCT that compared HRVB to TAU, N = 24 diagnosed with stress-related chronic neck-shoulder pain
HRVB resulted in improved ratings of health (vitality, pain, and social functioning)
Vagedes et al. (2012)
RCT that compared stabilization exercise, HRVB, myofascial release, and a combination of all three treatments, N = 109diagnosed with musculoskeletal pain
Combined treatment produced greater improvements in pain and function than the separate interventions
TAU = treatment as usual
Gevirtz (2013) hypothesizes that HRVB improvement in autonomic balance may interfere with SNS innervation of trigger points through the mechanism of accentuated antagonism (Olshansky, Sabbah, Hauptman, & Colucci, 2008).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
115
Fibromyalgia (FM)
Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic benign pain disorder that involves pain, tenderness, and stiffness in the connective tissue of muscles, tendons, ligaments, and adjacent soft tissue.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) adult criteria include widespread pain for at least 3 months on both sides of the body and pain during gentle palpation on 11 of 18 tender points on neck, shoulder, chest, back, arm, hip, and knee sites.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
116
Patients also present with attentional deficits, depression, severe fatigue, headaches, impaired multitasking, irritable bowel syndrome, memory deficits, sleep disturbance, and temporomandibular muscle and joint pain (Donaldson & Sella, 2003; Tortora & Derrickson, 2014).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
McGrady and Moss (2013) conceptualize FM as a “pain amplification disorder” produced by the twin mechanisms of allodynia and hyperalgesia (p. 187).
Allodyniameans that patients experience previously benign stimuli as painful.
Hyperalgesiameans patients experience mildly painful stimuli as severely painful.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
117
While an initial injury that damages tissue may sensitize the body through peripheral and central sensitization, in other cases there may be no identifiable precipitating event.
Sequelae of negative emotion and sleep deprivation amplify pain and impair cognitive performance.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Patients present with multiple tender points, which are distinct from trigger points. Tender points are located at a muscle's insertion (the tendinous attachment to a movable bone) instead of the muscle belly or associated fascia.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
118
Tender points are associated with local tenderness. When compressed, they produce local pain, but not the referred pain associated with trigger points. Pressure on tender points may increase overall pain sensitivity.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Fibromyalgia is sometimes confused with Myofascial Pain Syndrome (MPS) because both syndromes involve muscle tenderness and local pain during palpation.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
119
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Trigger Points Tender Points
Local tenderness, taut band, local twitchresponse, jump sign
Local tenderness
Singular or multiple Multiple
May occur in any skeletal muscle Occurs in specific locations that are symmetrically positioned
May cause a specific referred pain pattern
Do not cause referred pain, but often increase total body pain sensitivity
Source: Alvarez & Rockwell (2002)
Patients may present with both fibromyalgia and MPS, and have both tender points and trigger points. Accurate diagnosis requires careful examination by an experienced clinician (Alvarez & Rockwell, 2002).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
120
Biofeedback is probably efficacious for fibromyalgia (Donaldson, 2016). HRVB is possibly efficacious due to limited research (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomeFibromyalgia Hassett et al.
(2007)Open label trial with no control group, N = 12 diagnosed with FM
HRVB improved depression, pain, and sleep
Research has included HRVB as a treatment component in addition to exercise, cognitive therapies (Acceptance and Commitment Therapy and Cognitive Behavioral Therapy), and interventions to improve sleep habits.
The putative mechanism may be increased autonomic balance (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
121
Part 6: Respiratory Disorders:
Asthma and COPD
Asthma
Asthma involves episodic reversible airway obstruction, chronic airway inflammation and hypersensitivity to stimuli (like allergens, cold air, exercise, and viral infection).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
122
The early phase response features smooth muscle spasm and excessive mucus secretion, which obstruct the airways.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
123
The late phase response involves inflammation, scar tissue formation, fluid accumulation, and death of the epithelial cells that line the bronchioles (Fox, 2016; Tortora & Derrickson, 2014).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
While allergens, exercise, and drugs like aspirin can trigger asthma attacks, both acute and chronic stress can also precipitate asthma attacks in children diagnosed with this disorder.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
124
Attacks by bullies, family conflict, and academic difficulties can increase the risk of asthma attacks eight times (Sandberg et al., 2000).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Gevirtz, Lehrer, and Schwartz (2016) hypothesized that asthma may be mediated by hyperactivity of smooth pulmonary muscle, excessive parasympathetic tone, and inflammation ofthe airway (p. 201).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
125
While HRV biofeedback is probably efficacious for the treatment of asthma, there is a need for long‐term follow‐up data (Lehrer, 2016).
The mechanism may be increased autonomic balance, which reduces contraction of the bronchioles and mucus secretion (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design Outcome
Asthma Lehrer et al., 2000;Lehrer et al., 2004
Randomized controlled design with placebo and wait-list controls, N = 94
reduced asthma medication,improved pulmonary function, fewer asthma symptoms and episodes, improved one full level of asthma severity
HRVB superior to control
126
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a family of lung diseases that interfere with air flow. This is a progressive disorder and almost 50% of severe cases die within 10 years of initial diagnosis.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Chronic obstructive bronchitis and emphysema comprise COPD.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
EMPHYSEMA
CHRONICBRONCHITIS
COPD
127
Chronic obstructive bronchitis persists for at least 3 months and involves airway obstruction. Patients present with a productive cough and wheezing.
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Emphysema involves damage and destruction of the air sac walls. The few surviving air sacs are larger and are less able to exchange gas. Patients present with wheezing and coughing(The Merck Manual, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
128
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
HRVB is possibly efficacious for COPD (Gilbert, 2016).
HRVB may produce functional gains by increasing autonomic balance (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Problem Study Design OutcomeCOPD Giardino et al.
(2004)Multiple case study HRV biofeedback with pulse oximetry biofeedback, N = 20
HRVB superior to TAU. Improved exercise tolerance, gas exchangeefficiency, and quality of life.
129
Part 7: Optimal Performance
Optimal Performance Applications
Biofeedback and neurofeedbackwarrant a rating of probably efficacious (Sherlin & Larson Ford, 2016).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
130
HRVB is possibly efficacious in baseball, basketball, dance, golf, and music.
The hypothetical mechanism might be increased vagal tone (Gevirtz, 2013).
Clinical Efficacy of HRV Biofeedback
Performance Study Design Outcome
Baseball Strack (2003) RCT that compared HRVB vs. control, N = 42 high school baseball players
HRVB group improved batting (60%) more than the control group (21%)
Basketball Paul & Garg (2012)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. placebo and control, N = 30 basketball players, university level and above
HRVB group improved on anxiety, coping self-efficacy, and performance compared to the placebo and control groups
Dance Raymond et al.(2005)
RCT that compared HRVB vs. alpha-theta neurofeedback and control, N = 24 ballroom and Latin dancers
HRVB and alpha-theta groups improved more than the control group, overall, and on different subscales
Gruzelier et al. (2014)
RCT that compared HRVB vs.alpha-theta neurofeedback, choreology instruction, and control; subjects were first-year contemporary dance conservatoire students
No improvement of dance performance, HRVB reduced anxiety, and this reduction was correlated with improvement in ratings of dance technique and artistry
Golf Lagos et al. (2008; 2011)
Two single case studies of resonance frequency HRVB, the second case was treated at a virtual reality golf center
Increase in golf performance and HRV (total, LF, and 0.1 Hz); decrease in anxiety, stress, and sensation-seeking symptoms after 10 weeks
Music Thurber (2006) RCT that compared HRVB + emotional self-regulation vs. control, N = 14 student musicians
HRVB group improved on the Music Performance Anxiety scale
RCT = randomized controlled trial
131
Application Rating Hypothetical Mechanism
Psychological DisordersAnxietyPTSDDepression
EfficaciousProbably efficaciousEfficacious
Increased vagal toneIncreased vagal toneIncreased vagal tone
Blood Pressure HypertensionPrehypertensionPreeclampsia
Efficacious
Efficacious
Increased baroreceptor reflex sensitivityImproved autonomic balanceImproved autonomic balance
Cardiovascular DisordersCongestive Heart FailureCoronary Artery Disease
Possibly efficaciousPossibly efficacious
Improved autonomic balanceImproved autonomic balance
Functional gastrointestinal disorders Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)Recurrent abdominal pain
EfficaciousPossibly efficacious
Improved autonomic balanceImproved autonomic balance
Pain DisordersChronic muscle painFibromyalgia (FM)
EfficaciousProbably efficacious
Improved autonomic balanceImproved autonomic balance
Respiratory DisordersAsthmaCOPD
Probably efficaciousPossibly efficacious
Improved autonomic balanceImproved autonomic balance
Application Rating Hypothetical Mechanism
Optimal PerformanceBaseballBasketballDanceGolfMusic
Possibly efficacious Increased vagal tone
132
anxiety disorders: psychological disorders that include generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), panic states, phobia, and post‐traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).
asthma: episodic reversible airway obstruction, chronic airway inflammation and hypersensitivity to stimuli (like allergens, cold air, exercise, and viral infection). Chronic inflammation may scar the airway resulting in obstruction that does not reverse with medication.
chronic muscle pain: persistent localized pain that may be mediated by autonomic imbalance resulting in excessive sympathetic outflow to muscle spindles, resulting in trigger points.
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): progressive respiratory disorder that is mainly caused by smoking tobacco, additional causes include cystic fibrosis, alpha‐1 antitrypsin deficiency, bronchiectasis (chronic abnormal bronchiole dilation), and rare bullous lung diseases (featuring thin‐walled sacs that contain air).
Glossary
congestive heart failure: condition where the heart cannot pump sufficient blood to meet the body's needs and can result in exercise intolerance, leg swelling, and shortness of breath.
coronary artery disease: progressive inflammatory disorder characterized by plaque build‐up in the coronary arteries, which restricts blood flow to the heart and causes heart attacks.
cyclic vomiting syndrome: recurring episodes of intense nausea and vomiting with periodic abdominal pain and headaches.
depression: psychological disorder characterized by sadness, loss of appetite, energy, and interests, and problems with concentration.
functional gastrointestinal disorders: persistent and recurring GI complaints, including abnormal GI muscular activity and discomfort or pain when digesting a meal due to abnormal GI tract functioning.
hypertension: elevated blood pressure where systolic blood pressure exceeds 140 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure exceeds 90 mmHg.
Glossary
133
irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): functional syndrome characterized by cramping, abdominal pain, bloating, diarrhea, constipation, and changes in bowel habits.
prehypertension: systolic blood pressure from 130‐139 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure from 80‐89 mmHg.
recurrent abdominal pain (RAP): at least 3 episodes of often severe abdominal pain over a 3‐month period; diagnosed in up to 30% of children ages 4 to 12.
Glossary
Beidel, D. C., Bulik, C. M., & Stanley, M. A. (2014). Abnormal psychology. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.
Botha, C. A., Naqvi, H., Chua, Y. C., Knowles, C. H., & Aziz, Q. (2012). The effect of psychophysiological autonomic modulation on human oesophageal pain hypersensitivity. Gut, 60, A26 [abstract]. doi:10.1136/gut.2011.239301.53
Ching, J., Khan, S., White, P., Reed, J., Ramnarine, D., Sieradzan, K., & Sandeman, D. (2012). Long‐term effectiveness and tolerability of vagal nerve stimulation in adults with intractable epilepsy: A retrospective analysis of 100 patients. British Journal of Neurosurgery, 27(2), 228‐234.
Christopher, P. P., Leykin, Y., Appelbaum, P. S., Holtzheimer, P. E., 3rd, Mayberg, H. S., & Dunn, L. B. (2012). Enrolling in deep brain stimulation research for depression: Influences on potential subjects' decision making. Depression and Anxiety, 29(2), 139‐146.
Cullin, S., Gevirtz, R., Poelter, D., Cousins, L., Harpin, E., & Muench, F. (2013). An exploratory analysis of the utility of adding cardiorespiratory biofeedback in the standard care of pregnancy‐induced hypertension. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 38(3), 161‐170. doi:10.1007/s10484‐013‐9219‐4
References
134
Currie, J., Stabile, M., & Jones, L. E. (2013). Do stimulant medications improve educational and behavioral outcomes for children with ADHD? NBER Working Paper Series. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Del Pozo, J. M., Gevirtz, R. N., Scher, B., & Guarneri, E. (2004). Biofeedback treatment increases heart rate variability in patients with known coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal, 147(3), E11.
Dobbin, A., Dobbin, J., Ross, S. C., Graham, C., & Ford, M. J. (2013). Randomized controlled trial of brief intervention with biofeedback and hypnotherapy in patients with refractory irritable bowel syndrome. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh, 43(1), 15‐23.
Donaldson, S. (2016). Fibromyalgia. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Ebben, M. R., Kurbatov, V., & Pollak, C. P. (2009). Moderating laboratory adaptation with the use of a heart‐rate variability biofeedback device (StressEraser). Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(4), 245‐249.
References
Elliot, W. J., Izzo, J. L., Jr., White, W. B., Rosing, D. R., Snyder, C. S., Alter, A., . . . Black, H. R. (2004). Graded blood pressure reduction in hypertensive outpatients associated with use of a device to assist with slow breathing. Journal of Clinical Hypertension, 6, 553‐561.
Esteve, F., Blanc‐Gras, N., Gallego, J., & Benechetrit, G. (1996). The effects of breathing pattern training on ventilatory function in patients with COPD. Biofeedback and Self‐regulation, 21(4), 311‐321.
Fournier, J. C., DeRubeis, R. J., Hollon, S. D., Dimidjian, S., Amsterdam, J. D., Shelton, R. C., . . . Fawcett, J. (2010). Antidepressant drug effects and depression severity: A patient‐level meta‐analysis. JAMA, 303(1), 47‐53.
Gershon, M. D. (1998). The second brain: The scientific basis of gut instinct and a groundbreaking new understanding of nervous disorders of the stomach and intestine. New York: Harper Collins.
Gevirtz, R. (2006). The muscle spindle trigger point model of chronic pain. Biofeedback, 34(2), 53‐57.
References
135
Gevirtz, R. (2013). The promise of heart rate variability biofeedback: Evidence‐based applications. Biofeedback, 41(3), 110‐120.
Gevirtz, R. N., Lehrer, P. M., & Schwartz, M. S. (2016). Cardiorespiratory biofeedback. In M.S. Schwartz & F. Andrasik (Eds.). Biofeedback: A practitioner’s guide (4th ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Gilbert, C. (2016). Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Ginsberg, J. P., Berry, M. E., & Powell, D. A. (2010). Cardiac coherence and posttraumatic stress disorder in combat veterans. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 16(4), 52‐60.
Ginsberg, J., Foster, D. S., & Tan, G. (2016). Posttraumatic stress disorder. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
References
Gruzelier, J., Thompson, T., Brandt, R., & Steffert, T. (2014). Application of alpha/theta neurofeedback and heart rate variability training to contemporary dancers: State anxiety and creativity. International Journal of Psychophysiology.
Guiles, R. A. F., Stern, M. J., Huntley, C., & Gevirtz, R. (2016). Functional/recurrent abdominal pain. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Hallman, D. M., Olsson, E. M., von Scheele, B., Melin, L., & Lyskov, E. (2011). Effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in subjects with stress‐related chronic neck pain: A pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(2), 71‐80.
Hassett, A. L., & Gevirtz, R. N. (2009). Nonpharmacologic treatment for fibromyalgia: Patient education, cognitive‐behavioral therapy, relaxation techniques, and complementary and alternative medicine. Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America, 35(2), 393‐407.
References
136
Henriques, G., Keffer, S., Abrahamson, C., & Horst, S. J. (2011). Exploring the effectiveness of a computer‐based heart rate variability biofeedback program in reducing anxiety in college students. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(2), 101‐112.
Hubbard, D. (1996). Chronic and recurrent muscle pain: Pathophysiology and treatment, a review of pharmocologic studies. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain, 4(1/2), 123‐143.
Hubbard, D. (1998). Persistent muscular pain: Approaches to relieving trigger points. Journal of Musculoskeletal Medicine, 15(5), 16‐26.
Hubbard, D. R., & Berkoff, G. M. (1993). Myofascial trigger points show spontaneous needle EMG activity. Spine, 18(13), 1803‐1807.
Huikuri, H. V., & Makikallio, T. H. (2001). Heart rate variability in ischemic heart disease. Autonomic Neuroscience: Basic and Clinical, 90, 95‐101.
Humphreys, P. A., & Gevirtz, R.N. (2000). Treatment of recurrent abdominal pain: Components analysis of four treatment protocols. Journal of Pediatric Gastroenterology & Nutrition, 31, 47‐51.
References
Huntley, A., White, A. R., & Ernst, E. (2002). Relaxation therapies for asthma: A systematic review. Thorax, 57(2), 127‐131.
Jones, K. D., & Liptan, G. L. (2009). Exercise interventions in fibromyalgia: Clinical applications from the evidence. Rheumatic Diseases Clinics of North America, 35(2), 373‐391.
Karavidas, M. K., Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Marin, H., Buyske, S., . . . Hassett, A. (2007). Preliminary results of an open label study of heart rate variability biofeedback for the treatment of major depression. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 32(1), 19‐30.
Kern‐Buell, C. L., McGrady, A. V., Conran, P. B., & Nelson, L. A. (2000). Asthma severity, psychophysiological indicators of arousal and immune function in asthma patients undergoing biofeedback‐assisted relaxation. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 25(2), 79‐91.
Kleiger, R. E., Miller, J. P., Bigger, J. T., Jr., &Moss, A. J. (1987). Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. American Journal of Cardiology, 59, 256‐262.
References
137
Lagos, L., Vaschillo, B., Vaschillo, E., Lehrer, P. M., & Bates, M. (2008). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a strategy for dealing with competitive anxiety: A case study. Biofeedback. 36(3), 109–115.
LaVaque, T. J., Hammond, D. C., Trudeau, D., Monastra, V., Perry, J., Lehrer, P., Matheson, D., & Sherman, R. (2002). Template for developing guidelines for the evaluation of the clinical efficacy of psychophysiological evaluations. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(4), 273‐281.
Lehrer, P. M. (2007). Biofeedback training to increase heart rate variability. In P. M. Lehrer, R. M. Woolfolk, & W. E. Sime (Eds.). Principles and practice of stress management (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
Lehrer, P. M. (2016). Asthma. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Lehrer, P. M., Smetankin, A., & Potapova, T. (2000). Respiratory sinus arrhythmia biofeedback therapy for asthma: A report of 20 unmedicated pediatric cases using the Smetankin method. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 25(3), 193‐200.
References
Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Lu, S.‐E., Scardella, A., Siddique, M., & Habib, R. H. (2004). Biofeedback treatment for asthma. Chest, 126(2), 352‐361.
Lin, G., Xiang, Q., Fu, X., Wang, S., Chen, S., Shao, L., . . .Wang, T. (2012). Heart rate variability biofeedback decreases blood pressure in prehypertensive subjects by improving autonomic function and baroreflex. Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine, 18(2), 143‐152.
Linden, W., & Moseley, J. V. (2006). The efficacy of behavioral treatments for hypertension. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 31(1), 51‐63.
Lucini, D., Milani, R. V., Constantino, G., Lavie, C. J., Porta, A., & Pagani, M. (2002). Effects of cardiac rehabilitation and exercise training on autonomic regulation in patients with coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal, 143, 977‐983.
McCraty, R., Atkinson, M., Lipsenthal, L., & Arguelles, L. (2009). New hope for correctional officers: an innovative program for reducing stress and health risks. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(4), 251‐272.
References
138
McGrady, A. (2016). Hypertension. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
McGrady, A., & Moss, D. (2013). Pathways to illness, pathways to health. New York: Springer.
Mancia, G., Ludbrook, J., Ferrari, A., Gregorini, L., & Zanchetti, A. (1978). Baroreceptor reflexes in human hypertension. Circulation Research, 43, 170‐177.
Moravec, C. S. (2008). Biofeedback therapy in cardiovascular disease: Rationale and research overview. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 75 (Suppl 2), S35‐38.
Moravec, C. S., & McKee, M. G. (2011). Biofeedback in the treatment of heart disease. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 78 (Suppl 1), S20‐23.
Moravec, C. S., & McKee, M. G. (2013). Psychophysiologic remodeling of the failing heart. Biofeedback, 41(1), 7‐12.
References
Moravec, C. S., & McKee, M. G. (2016). Coronary artery disease. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Moss, D. (2016). Anxiety and anxiety disorders. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Nada, P. J. (2009). Heart rate variability in the assessment and biofeedback training of common mental health problems in children. Medicinski Arhiv, 63(5), 244‐248.
Nolan, R. P., Kamath, M. V., Floras, J. S., Stanley, J., Pang, C., Picton, P., & Young, Q. R. (2005). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a behavioral neurocardiac intervention to enhance vagal heart rate control. American Heart Journal, 149(6), 1137.
Olshansky, B., Sabbah, H. N., Hauptman, P. J., & Colucci, W. S. (2008). Parasympathetic nervous system and heart failure: Pathophysiology and potential implications for therapy. Circulation, 118(8), 863‐871.
References
139
Patron, E., Messerotti Benvenuti, S., Favretto, G., Valfre, C., Bonfa, C., Gasparotto, R., & Palomba, D. (2013). Biofeedback assisted control of respiratory sinus arrhythmia as a biobehavioral intervention for depressive symptoms in patients after cardiac surgery: A preliminary study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 38(1), 1‐9.
Paul, M., & Garg, K. (2012). The effect of heart rate variability biofeedback on performance psychology of basketball players. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 131‐144.
Porges, S. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neuropsychological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self‐regulation. New York: W.W. Norton.
Prasad, V., Vandross, A., Toomey, C., Cheung, M., Rho, J., Quinn, S., . . . Vifu, A. (2013). A decade of reversal: An analysis of 146 contradicted medical practices. Mayo Clinic Proceedings, 88(8). 790‐798.
Prigatano, G. P. (1972). Spider phobia: Autonomic reactions and biofeedback control of heart rate variability. Bowling Green, KY: Bowling Green State University.
References
Raymond, J., Sajid, I., Parkinson, L. A., & Gruzelier, J. H. (2005). Biofeedback and dance performance: A preliminary investigation. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 30(1), 64‐73.
Reiner, R. (2008). Integrating a portable biofeedback device into clinical practice for patients with anxiety disorders: Results of a pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology Biofeedback, 33(1), 55‐61.
Reinke, A., Gevirtz, R., & Mussgay, L. (2007). Effects of heart rate variability feedback in reducing blood pressure [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 32, 134.
Shaffer, F., & Meehan, Z. M. (2016). Preeclampsia. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Shaffer, F., & Moss, D. (2006). Biofeedback. In Y. Chun‐Su, E. J. Bieber, & B. Bauer (Eds.). Textbook of complementary and alternative medicine (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxfordshire, UK: Informa Healthcare.
References
140
Shaffer, F., & Zerr, C. L. (2016). Depressive disorders. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Shaffer, F., Zerr, C. L., & Allen, J. (2015). The use of device‐guided breathing in the treatment of hypertension: A meta‐analytic review [Abstract]. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 40(2), 131‐132. doi:10.1007/s10484‐015‐9282‐0
Sherlin, L., & Ford, N. L. , (2016). Performance enhancement. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Sherman, R. A,, Tan, G., & Wei Wei, L.(2016). Chronic pain. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Siepmann, M., Aykac, V., Unterdorfer, J., Petrowski, K., & Mueck‐Weymann, M. (2008). A pilot study on the effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with depression and in healthy subjects. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 33(4), 195‐201.
References
Siepmann, M., Hennig, U., Siepmann, T., Nitzsche, K., Muck‐Weymann, M., Petrowski, K., & Weidner, K. (2014). The effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with preterm labour. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(1), 27‐35. doi:10.1007/s10484‐013‐9238‐1.
Slutsker, B., Konichezky, A., & Gothelf, D. (2010). Breaking the cycle: Cognitive behavioral therapy and biofeedback training in a case of cyclic vomiting syndrome. Psychology, Health and Medicine, 15(6), 625‐631.
Sowder, E., Gevirtz, R., Shapiro, W., & Ebert, C. (2010). Restoration of vagal tone: A possible mechanism for functional abdominal pain. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35(3), 199‐206.
Stein, P. K., Ehsani, A. A., Domitrovich, P. P., Kleiger, R. E., & Rottman, J. N. (1999). Effect of exercise training on heart rate variability in healthy older adults. Am Heart J., 138 (3 Pt 1), 567‐76.
References
141
Stern, M. J., Guiles, R. A. F., Huntley, C., & Gevirtz, R. (2016). Irritable Bowel Syndrome. In G. Tan, F. Shaffer, R. Lyle, & I. Teo (Eds.). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Strack, B., & Gevirtz, R. (2011). Getting to the heart of the matter: Heart rate variability biofeedback for enhanced performance. In B. Strack, M. Linden & V. Wilson (Eds.), Biofeedback and neurofeedback applications in sport psychology (pp. 145‐174). Wheat Ridge, CO: AAPB.
Swanson, K. S., Gevirtz, R. N., Brown, M., Spira, J., Guarneri, E., & Stoletniy, L. (2009). The effect of biofeedback on function in patients with heart failure. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(2), 71‐91.
Tan, G., Dao, T. K., Farmer, L., Sutherland, R. J., & Gevirtz, R. (2011). Heart rate variability (HRV) and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD): A pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(1), 27‐35.
References
Tan, G., Shaffer, F., Lyle, R., & Teo, I. (2016). Evidence‐based practice in biofeedback and neurofeedback (3rd ed.). Wheat Ridge, CO: Association for Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback.
The merck manual (2013). doi: http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/index.html
Thurber, M. R. (2006). Effects of heart‐rate variability biofeedback training and emotional regulation on music performance anxiety in university students. Denton, TX: University of North Texas Press.
Tracey, K. J. (2002). The inflammatory reflex. Nature, 420(6917), 853‐859.
Tracey, W. R., Alexander, D. I., Eyre, P., & Singh, A. (1985). Cholinergic properties of the bronchial artery and contribution of the endothelium. Artery, 12(4), 244‐262.
Vagades, J., Gordon, C., Schwaemmle, M., Andrasik, F., Gevirtz, R. N., Hautzinger, M., & Birbaumer, N. (2011). Does deep breathing training improve myofascial release in combination with trigger point therapy for patients with low back pain? Oral presentation at the 15th annual meeting of the Biofeedback Foundation of Europe. Munich, Germany.
References
142
Van Der Kolk, B. A. (2001). The psychobiology and psychopharmacology of PTSD. Human Psychopharmacology, 16(S1), S49‐S64.
Van Der Kolk, B. A. (2006). Clinical implications of neuroscience research in PTSD. Annals of the New York Academy of Science, 1071, 277‐293.
Vaschillo, E., Lehrer, P., Rishe, N., & Konstantinov, M. (2002). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a method for assessing baroreflex function: A preliminary study of resonance in the cardiovascular system. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 27(1), 1‐27.
Wang, S. S. (2013). ADHD drugs don’t boost kids’ grades. The Wall Street Journal, doi: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887323368704578593660384362292.html
Wang, S. Z., Li, S., Xu, X. Y., Lin, G. P., Shao, L., Zhao, Y., & Wang, T. H. (2009). Effect of slow abdominal breathing combined with biofeedback on blood pressure and heart rate variability in prehypertension. J Altern Complementary Medicine, 16(10), 1039‐1045.
References
Wheat, A. L., & Larkin, K. T. (2010). Biofeedback of heart rate variability and related physiology: A critical review. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35(3), 229‐242.
Yorke, J., Fleming, S. L., & Shuldham, C. M. (2007). Psychological interventions for adults with asthma. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, CD002982.
Zucker, T. L., Samuelson, K. W., Muench, F., Greenberg, M. A., & Gevirtz, R. N. (2009). The effects of respiratory sinus arrhythmia biofeedback on heart rate variability and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 34(2), 135‐143.
References