+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bearings-131 Part 1

Bearings-131 Part 1

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: khaled-hassan
View: 219 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend

of 74

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    1/74

    S.Mekid 1

    Equivalent load

    1

    Except for pure thrust bearings and cylindrical roller

    bearings, all other bearings are usually operated with

    somecombinationof radialFrand thrust loadF

    a.

    Since catalog ratings are based only on radial loading (oronly on thrust loading),an equivalent radial loadF

    emust

    be calculated.

    Remember equivalent stress

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    2/74

    S.Mekid 2

    Equivalent load

    2

    efD FaF

    The equivalent radial loadFe(for radial bearings) is calculated

    using the following AFBMA equation:

    airie FYVFXF

    The design Load is thus:

    FD Design Load

    af Application Factor (service factor) obtained from table 11.5

    Fe Radial Equivalent loadFr Radial load

    Fa Axial (thrust) load

    V Rotation factor (V = 1 for rotating inner ring, V= 1.2 for outer ring )

    Xi & Yi respectively radial and thrust load factors obtained from table 11.1

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    3/74

    S.Mekid 3

    Equivalent load

    3

    Variation of Equivalent Load

    with thrust (axial) Fa( Figure

    11.6 see Table 11.1).

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    4/74

    S.Mekid 4

    Bearing Selection

    4

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    5/74

    S.Mekid 5

    Bearing Selection

    5

    Only to ball, straight roller and spherical roller bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    6/74

    S.Mekid 6

    Sample Problem on Bearing Selection

    6

    Select a ball Bearing for an industrial machine intended for

    continuous one-shift 8-h/day operation at 1800 rpm.

    The radial and thrust loads are 1.7 and 1.2 kN

    respectively.

    The machine operates with light to moderate impact

    The desired reliability is 95%.Given

    1. Ball bearing (a = 3)

    2. Machine working 8-hr continuous (table 11.4)

    3. nD

    = 1800 rpm

    4. Fr= 1.7 kN

    5. Fa= 1.2 kN

    6. Light to moderate impact

    7. R = 0.95

    Required:

    Select ball bearing (C10?)

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    7/74

    S.Mekid 7 7

    6.0)95.01(439.402.0

    )1(439.402.0

    483.1/1

    483.1/1

    DR

    RK

    a

    R

    DDKxFC

    /1

    10

    483.1/1)1(439.402.0 DR RK

    324010

    60180030000

    60

    60/

    610

    RR

    DDD

    nL

    nLLLx

    Table 11.4 take highest to be conservativeBall bearing

    5115.1

    tablefroma

    FaF

    f

    efD

    Now the problem is finding the equivalent load Fe

    Sample Problem on Bearing Selection

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    8/74

    S.Mekid 8

    PROCEDURE:

    Compute Equivalent Load?

    SELECTION?

    ?7.17.11111 MaxkNVFXF re

    2.17.1156.0 2222 YFYVFXF are1stIteration:1. Assume a value mid-range from Table 11.1: Y2=1.71or 1.63

    Another method is to start from table 11.2 directly selecting candidate bearing

    2. Compute Fe2:

    3. Compute C10:

    4. Select candidate bearing from Table 11.2 (02-series)

    a. Try deep groove first (cheaper, easier to mount) C=83.2 kN and C0

    =53 kN

    b. If angular contact is considered: C=80.6 kN and C0=55 kN

    kNFkNF ee 7.104.32.17.1156.0 12 71.1

    kNK

    xFC

    a

    R

    DD 05.80

    6.0

    32405.104.3

    3/1/1

    10

    Y2=?

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    9/74

    S.Mekid 9 9

    21.00218.055

    2.1

    Re)(71.199.1

    22.00226.053

    2.1

    0

    2

    0

    eC

    F

    peatAssumedYtheneVF

    F

    eC

    F

    a

    r

    a

    aFor Deep-Groove Bearing

    For Angular Contact Bearing

    2ndIteration:2. Compute Fe2:

    3. Compute C10:

    4. Select candidate bearing from Table 11.2 (02-series)

    a. Try deep groove first (cheaper, easier to mount) C= 95.6 kN and C0= 62 kN

    b. If angular contact is considered: C=90.4 kN and C0=63kN

    kNFkNF ee 7.134.32.17.1156.0 12 99.1

    kNK

    xFC

    a

    R

    DD 9.87

    6.0

    32405.134.3

    3/1/1

    10

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    10/74

    S.Mekid 10 10

    For Deep-Groove Bearing

    For Angular Contact Bearing

    3rdIteration:2. Compute Fe2:

    3. Compute C10:

    4. Select candidate bearing from Table 11.2 (02-series)

    a. Try deep groove first (cheaper, easier to mount) C= 95.6 kN and C0= 62 kN

    b. If angular contact is considered: C= 90.4 kN and C0= 63kN

    kNFkNF ee 7.142.32.115.27.1156.0 12

    kNK

    xFC

    a

    R

    DD 90

    6.0

    32405.142.3

    3/1/1

    10

    21.0019.063

    2.1

    Re)(99.115.2

    21.0019.0

    62

    2.1

    0

    2

    0

    eC

    F

    peatoldYtheneVF

    F

    e

    C

    F

    a

    r

    a

    a

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    11/74

    S.Mekid 11 11

    Since the 3rdbearing is the same as the 2ndwe stop and summarize:

    02 series deep-groove ball bearing with load rating of 95.6 kN

    and dimensions: d = 90 mm, D = 160 mm and W = 30 mm is the

    suitable bearing for the application.

    02 series angular contact ball bearing with load rating of 90.4

    kN and dimensions: d = 90 mm, D = 160 mm and W = 30 mmmay also be selected for the application.

    Note that in solving this problem no constraints concerning the

    size of shaft and housing were considered. In reality, shaft and

    housing dimensions are considered in the selection of bearings.

    Tables 11.2 and 11.3 do not allow the freedom for such selection

    but real catalogs do as shown in following SKF catalog tables.

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    12/74

    S.Mekid 12 12

    Bearing SelectionTable 11-2

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    13/74

    S.Mekid 13 13

    Bearing SelectionTable 11-3- Straight (Cylindrical) Roller Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    14/74

    S.Mekid 14

    Bearing Selection

    14

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    15/74

    S.Mekid 15 15

    Bearing Selection

    Principal Dimensions Basic load ratings Allowable

    load limit

    Speed ratings Abutment and fillet

    Dimensions

    Designation

    db da bw

    dynamic

    C

    static

    C0 wall

    grease oil

    Db,min Da,max ra,max

    mm

    in

    mm

    in

    mm

    in

    N

    lbf

    rpm mm

    in

    mm

    in

    mm

    in

    2.5

    0.0984

    8

    0.3150

    2.8

    0.1102

    319

    71.7

    106

    23.8

    4

    0.899

    67000 80000 3.7

    0.146

    6.8

    0.268

    0.1

    0.004

    60/2.5

    5

    0.1969

    11

    0.4331

    3

    0.1181

    637

    143

    255

    57.3

    11

    2.47

    53000 63000 6.2

    0.244

    9.8

    0.386

    0.1

    0.004

    618/5

    190.7480

    60.2362

    1720387

    620139

    265.85

    36000 43000 70.276

    170.669

    0.30.012

    635

    7

    0.2756

    14

    0.5512

    3.5

    0.1378

    956

    215

    400

    89.9

    17

    3.82

    45000 53000 8.2

    0.323

    12.8

    0.504

    0.1

    0.004

    618/7

    10

    0.3937

    19

    0.7480

    5

    0.1969

    1380

    310

    585

    132

    25

    5.62

    36000 43000 12

    0.472

    17

    0.669

    0.3

    0.012

    61800

    26

    1.0236

    8

    0.3150

    4620

    1040

    1960

    441

    83

    18.7

    30000 36000 12

    0.472

    24

    0.945

    0.3

    0.012

    6000

    35

    1.3780

    11

    0.4331

    8060

    1810

    3400

    764

    143

    32.1

    20000 26000 14

    0.551

    31

    1.220

    0.6

    0.024

    6300

    15

    0.5906

    24

    0.9449

    5

    0.1969

    1560

    351

    800

    180

    34

    7.64

    28000 34000 17

    0.669

    22

    0.866

    0.3

    0.012

    61802

    28

    1.1024

    7

    0.2756

    4030

    906

    2040

    459

    85

    19.1

    24000 30000 17

    0.669

    26

    1.024

    0.3

    0.012

    61902

    32

    1.2598

    8

    0.3150

    5590

    1260

    2850

    641

    120

    27.0

    22000 28000 17

    0.669

    30

    1.181

    0.3

    0.012

    16002

    32

    1.2598

    9

    0.3543

    5590

    1260

    2850

    641

    120

    27.0

    22000 28000 17

    0.669

    30

    1.181

    0.3

    0.012

    6002

    35

    1.3780

    11

    0.4331

    7800

    1750

    3750

    843

    160

    36.0

    19000 24000 19

    0.748

    31

    1.220

    0.6

    0.024

    6202

    42

    1.6535

    13

    0.5118

    11400

    2560

    5400

    1210

    228

    51.3

    17000 20000 20

    0.787

    37

    1.457

    1

    0.039

    6302

    See Tables 11.2 for BB

    11.3 for SRB

    1998 McGraw-Hill

    Single Row, Deep Groove Ball Bearings[From SKF Catalog (1991)]

    with full outer

    ring shoulders

    with recessed outer

    ring shoulders

    ra

    dadb

    bw

    Da Db

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    16/74

    S.Mekid 162010/2011 Chapter 11-Notes 16

    1998 McGraw-Hill

    Single Row Deep Groove Ball Bearings20-30 mm

    Principal Dimensions Basic load ratings Allowableload limit

    Spe ed ratings Abutm ent and filletDimensions

    db da bw

    dynamicC

    staticC0 wall

    grease oilDb,min Da,max ra,max

    mmin

    mmin

    mmin

    Nlbf

    rpm mmin

    mmin

    mmin

    200.7874

    321.2598

    70.2756

    2700607

    1500337

    6314.2

    19000 24000 220.866

    301.181

    0.30.012

    371.4567

    90.3543

    63701430

    3650821

    15635.1

    18000 22000 220.866

    351.378

    0.30.012

    421.6535

    80.3150

    68901550

    4050910

    17338.9

    17000 20000 220.866

    401.575

    0.30.012

    421.6535

    120.4724

    93602100

    50001120

    21247.7

    17000 20000 240.945

    381.496

    0.60.024

    47

    1.8504

    14

    0.5512

    12700

    2860

    6550

    1470

    280

    62.9

    15000 18000 25

    0.984

    42

    1.654

    1

    0.03952

    2.047215

    0.5906159003570

    78001750

    33575.3

    13000 16000 26.51.043

    45.51.791

    10.039

    722.8346

    190.7480

    307006900

    150003370

    640144

    10000 13000 26.51.043

    65.52.579

    10.039

    250.9843

    371.4567

    70.2756

    4360980

    2600585

    12528.1

    17000 20000 271.063

    351.378

    0.30.012

    471.8504

    120.4724

    112002520

    65501470

    27561.8

    15000 18000 291.142

    431.693

    0.60.024

    622.4409

    170.6693

    225005060

    116002610

    490110

    11000 14000 31.51.240

    55.52.185

    10.039

    803.1496

    210.8268

    358008050

    193004340

    815183

    9000 11000 331.299

    722.835

    1.50.059

    301.1811 421.6535 70.2756 44901010 2900652 14632.8 15000 18000 321.260 401.575 0.30.01255

    2.165413

    0.5118133002990

    83001870

    35579.8

    12000 15000 351.378

    501.969

    10.039

    722.8346

    190.7480

    281006320

    160003600

    670151

    9000 11000 36.51.437

    65.52.579

    10.039

    903.5433

    230.9055

    436009800

    236005310

    1000225

    8500 10000 381.496

    823.228

    1.50.059

    Bearing Selection

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    17/74

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    18/74

    S.Mekid 18

    Tapered Roller Bearings

    2008/2009 Ch 11. Notes 18

    Cup Can be easily removedfrom cone and

    roller assembly because of this and

    because even a pure radial load willinduce a thrust load because of the

    taper TRB have to be mounted in

    pairs:

    Back to Back (Direct mounting)

    Front to Front (Indirect mounting)

    Timken Co.Data shows that the induced

    thrust force can be estimated from Eq.

    11-15:

    Nomenclature

    K

    FF ra o

    47.0)180(

    K =ratio of rated radial to rated thrust

    load approximated 1.5 for radialTRB

    and 0.75 for steep angle bearings

    Span

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    19/74

    S.Mekid 19

    Selection of Tapered Roller Bearings

    The load rating for Timken Co. tapered roller bearings is

    calculated as follows:a

    RRRvT

    DDf

    nLKff

    nLPaCC

    /1

    1090

    60

    60

    For Timken Co. Catalogs:

    LR

    = 3000 Hours and nR

    = 500 rpm (3000500 x60

    = 90.10 6revolutions)

    FD= a

    fP

    P is calculated as follows

    3/25.1/1 )1(48.4))/1(ln(48.4 DDR RRK

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    20/74

    S.Mekid 20

    Selection of Tapered Roller Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    21/74

    S.Mekid 21 21

    X

    O

    Selection of Tapered Roller Bearings

    X

    O

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    22/74

    S.Mekid 22

    Indirect mounting

    Direct mounting

    Indirect mounting

    provides greater rigidity

    when pair of bearings is

    closely spaced: front

    wheel of a car, drums,

    sheaves,..

    Direct mounting

    provides greater rigidity

    when pair of bearings is

    not closely spaced:transmission, speed

    reducers, rollers,..

    X

    O

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    23/74

    S.Mekid 23

    Selection of Tapered Roller Bearings

    23

    fV= Viscosity factor obtained from figure 11.17.

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    24/74

    S.Mekid 24

    fT=Temperature factor

    estimated from figure(11-16):

    Selection of Tapered Roller Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    25/74

    S.Mekid 25

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    26/74

    S.Mekid 26 26

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    27/74

    S.Mekid 27 27

    Solved Example

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    28/74

    S.Mekid 28 28

    Direct

    mount

    Shaft + right

    to Left

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    29/74

    S.Mekid 29 29

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    30/74

    S.Mekid 30 30

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    31/74

    S.Mekid 31

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

    31

    Alternative Mounting

    dsdH

    Positioning Floating

    Takes thrust

    No thrust and allows for

    shaft expansion when hot

    Retaining nuts on inner ringNo retaining devices on inner ring

    Outer races completely retained

    Shoulders in shaft and housing: See tables 11.2

    and 11.3 for dimensions

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    32/74

    S.Mekid 32 32

    Use of 2 or more bearingsin one end of shaft for

    additional rigidityor increased load capacity.

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    33/74

    S.Mekid 33 33

    Two-bearing mounting with use

    of washers against cone

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    34/74

    S.Mekid 34 34

    Duplex Mountingof angular contact bearings: Bearings manufacturedfor this purpose have their rings ground with an offset so that they are

    tightly clamped together and apreloadis automatically established

    (as you have seen on the animation).

    a) Face to face mounting (DF)for heavy Fr

    and Fa

    from either direction

    b) Back to back mounting (DB)=a)+ aligning stiffness

    c) Tandem arrangement (DT)for thrust which is always in the same

    direction. Preload required.

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    35/74

    S.Mekid 35 35

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    36/74

    S.Mekid 36

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

    http://www.toydirectory.com/monthly/new_product.asp?id=25163
  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    37/74

    S.Mekid 37

    http://www.toydirectory.com/monthly/new_product.asp?id=23961http://www.toydirectory.com/monthly/new_product.asp?id=25163
  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    38/74

    S.Mekid 38

    Needs preloadingSee p. 600.

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    39/74

    S.Mekid 39

    Low speeds Moderate to high speedsHigh to very

    high speeds

    spring

    rubber

    Mountingand Enclosure of Bearings

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    40/74

    S.Mekid 40

    Lubrication

    40

    Elastohydrodynamic lubrication:Remember the movie showing athin film (mm) of oil between rolling elements subjected to

    extreme pressures is transformed from a liquid lubricant (oil) into

    a solid for a nano fraction of a second.

    (from presentation by Saeed S. Aramco)

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    41/74

    S.Mekid 41

    Liquids (oils)

    Semi-Liquids (greases)

    Solids (Graphite)

    41

    Types of Lubricant

    See Page 597 of text book for conditions

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    42/74

    S.Mekid 42 42

    Mineral

    AdditivesBase Oil

    Synthetic

    NaphthenicParraffinic

    Lubricating Oil

    (from presentation by Saeed S. Aramco)

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    43/74

    S.Mekid 43 43

    Grease

    BaseOil Thickener Additives

    70 90

    %

    3 30

    %1 10

    %

    o Simple Metal Soapso Complex Metal Soap

    o Non-Soap

    (from presentation by Saeed S. Aramco)

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    44/74

    S.Mekid 44

    Common Oil Physical and Chemical Properties

    Color Appearance

    Flash point

    Pour point

    TAN

    TBN

    Density

    Oxidation stability Viscosity

    Viscosity Index

    44

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    45/74

    S.Mekid 45

    Common Oil Physical and ChemicalProperties

    Appearance Flash Point

    Pour Point

    TAN TBN

    Density

    Specific Gravity Viscosity

    Viscosity Index

    2008/2009 Ch 11. Notes 45

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    46/74

    S.Mekid 46

    FAILURE OF BEARINGS

    Failure causes1. - Manufacture and assembly

    Mounting with improper tools,

    Loose/tight fits, Misalignment, ...2. - Design and Operating conditions

    Bad selection, Overload, Fatigue, ...

    3. - LubricationUnsuitable/ excess/ lack, Contamination

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    47/74

    S.Mekid 47

    FAILURE OF BEARINGS

    Failure modes

    Fracture/Separation

    Spalling, Cracks, Smearing, Seizing,

    DeformationIndentations, Brinnelling, Fluting,

    Wear

    Abrasive, Burning, Scuffing, ...

    Corrosion

    Etching, Fretting, Rust Staining

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    48/74

    S.Mekid 48Ch 11. Notes 48

    Table 10

    Failure Causes of Rolling and Plain Bearings [5]

    Failure Cause Occurrence, %

    Rolling Plain

    Bearings Bearings

    Vendor problems 30.1 23.4

    Workmanship 14.4 10.7

    Errors in design/applications 13.8 9.1 Wrong material of construction 1.9 3.6

    User-induced problems 65.9 69.6

    Operational errors, maintenance

    deficiencies, failure of monitoring 37.4 39.1

    equipment

    Wear 28.5 30.5

    External problems 4.0 7.0

    Contaminated lubricants; intermittent

    failure of oil supply system 4.0 7.0

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    49/74

    S.Mekid 49

    FATIGUE FAILURE

    49

    VIDEOS 1 & 3

    Simulation of progression of

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    50/74

    S.Mekid 50

    Simulation of progression offatigue failure

    50

    Hamrock , J acobson and SchmidMcGraw-Hil l 1998

    Fatigue Wear

    .

    Text Reference: Figure 8.2 2, page 346

    FATIGUE (E d f f l lif ) S lli

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    51/74

    S.Mekid 51 51

    FATIGUE (End of useful life) Spalling

    Progression of fatigue failure.

    Spot

    Flaking Failure-Noise

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    52/74

    S.Mekid 52

    FATIGUE- Spalling

    52

    P i

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    53/74

    S.Mekid 53

    Prevention

    53

    Fatigue failure cannot be prevented, but it can be

    delayed by taking three steps:

    1. Make sure that the replacement bearing is designed

    to take the desired load.

    2. Protect the bearing from damage and keep it clean

    during the installation.

    3. Lubricate adequately.

    Mi li t

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    54/74

    S.Mekid 54

    Misalignment

    54

    Certain types of bearings cantolerate only limited amounts

    of misalignment.

    In deep groove ball bearings

    misalignmentwill produce

    load zones not parallelto ballgroove which can be detected

    easily.

    MISALIGNMENT

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    55/74

    S.Mekid 55 55

    MISALIGNMENT

    Advanced spalling

    caused by edge loading.

    In cylindrical and tapered roller bearings

    edge-load caused by misalignment causespremature spalling.

    Fatigue caused by edge loading.

    P ti

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    56/74

    S.Mekid 56

    Prevention

    56

    1. Make sure that the component is correctly aligned

    during installation

    2. Inspect shaft for any bowing

    3. If new or modified design, the distance between bearings

    should be determined by deformation analysis.

    4. Make sure that bearing seat is smooth

    5. After bearings are in place the shaft should be aligned

    with the machine6. Whenever possible use correct self-aligning bearings

    Lubrication related failures

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    57/74

    S.Mekid 57

    Lubrication-related failures

    57

    1. Inadequate lubricationis the cause of a large

    number of bearing premature failures.

    2. Inadequate lubrication will cause surface damage

    such as roughening, frostingleading to spalling.

    3. Inadequate lubrication will cause discolorationof the surface

    Spalling and discolration caused by

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    58/74

    S.Mekid 58

    p g yinadequate lubrication

    58

    Progressive stages of spalling Dislocationcaused by

    inadequate lubrication

    Inadequate lubrication

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    59/74

    S.Mekid 59

    Inadequate lubrication

    59

    Discolorationcaused by inadequate lubrication

    Contamination & Improper

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    60/74

    S.Mekid 60

    p pLubrication

    60

    The bearing failureappears to have beencaused by eitherabrasive wear from theintroduction of fineforeign particles and /or

    over-lubrication

    The failed rollers weresubjected to contactfatigue followed by heatchecking

    Optimize frequency oflubrication and amountof clean grease

    Contamination & Corrosion

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    61/74

    S.Mekid 61

    Contamination & Corrosion

    Corrosion results from the

    chemical attack on bearingmaterials.

    Symptoms include

    red/brown areas on rollingelements, raceways, orcages.

    Corrosion usually resultsin increased vibrationfollowed by wear, withsubsequent increase inradial clearance

    61

    Prevention

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    62/74

    S.Mekid 62

    Prevention

    62

    1. Make sure that the correct Manufacturer specified type o

    lubricant is used.

    2. Sufficient elastohydrodynamic film prevents surface distress

    (glazing, pitting).

    3. Good boundary lubrication guards against smearing and sliding

    surface wear.

    4. Clean lubricants prevent significant wear of rolling surfaces.

    5. Sufficient lubricant flow keeps bearings from overheating.

    6. Change the oil or grease in the bearing according

    Manufacturers schedule.

    Mounting Related Failures

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    63/74

    S.Mekid 63

    Mounting Related Failures

    63

    Fatigue from chipin bore Fragment denting

    Improper mounting practices can cause:

    1. Smearing or fragment denting2. Fatigue spalling (dirt)

    3. Impact damage

    Mounting Related Failures

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    64/74

    S.Mekid 64

    gSmearing

    64

    Smearing caused by excessive

    force in mountinga cylindrical

    roller bearing.

    (X 8) Enlargement ofsmearing.

    Mounting Related Failures

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    65/74

    S.Mekid 65

    gParasitic Thrust

    65

    Spalling from parasitic thrust (self-alignment bearing)

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    66/74

    S.Mekid 66

    Damage due to improper fits

    66

    The degree of tightness or looseness is

    Governed by both the levels of load and speed.

    In general the rotating ring is mountedwith interference fitand the non-rotating

    ring with slip-fit.

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    67/74

    S.Mekid 67

    (Scoring)

    67

    Scoringof inner ring caused by creep, relative

    movement between ring and shaft.

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    68/74

    S.Mekid 68

    Damage due to improper fits(Wear)

    68

    Wear due to creep. Brilliant polish due to lubrication

    penetration between ring and shaft seating. Face of ring

    is also damaged by shaft shoulder.

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    69/74

    S.Mekid 69

    Excessive Interference Fit

    69

    Axial crackscaused by excessive

    interference fit.

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    70/74

    S.Mekid 70

    Fretting Corrosion

    70

    Wear due Fretting corrosion

    caused by unnecessary loose

    housing fit.

    Advanced Wear due to

    Fretting corrosion.

    Damage due to improper fits

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    71/74

    S.Mekid 71

    Damage due to improper fits

    71

    Crack caused by faulty

    housing fit.

    Fretting caused by yield.

    Electric Fluting

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    72/74

    S.Mekid 72

    Electric Fluting

    Findings:

    The bearing hadundergone anincipient stage of

    electrical pitting(fluting)

    Recommendations:

    Insulate thebearings properly

    72

    Other causes of failure

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    73/74

    S.Mekid 73

    Other causes of failure

    73

    Electric current arcing

    Ineffective sealingVibration

    References

  • 8/10/2019 Bearings-131 Part 1

    74/74

    References

    1. J. E. Shigley and C. R. Mischke, Mechanical EngineeringDesign,McGraw-Hill, 2004 (7thEd.)

    2. J. E. Shigley and C. R. Mischke, Mechanical EngineeringDesign,McGraw-Hill, 2000 (6thed.).

    3. J. E. Shigley and C. R. Mischke, Standard Handbook ofMachine Design,McGraw-Hill, 1986.

    4. B. J. Hamrock, B. Jacobson and S. R. Schmid,Fundamentalsof Machine Elements, McGraw-Hill,1999.

    5. R. C. Juvinall and K. M. Marshek Fundamentals of Machine

    Component Design,John Wiley & Sons, 2000 (3rd ed.). 6. H. P. Bloch and F. K. Geitner, Machinery Failure Analysis

    and Troubleshooting, Vol.2, 2nd Ed., Gulf PublishingCo., USA, 1994.


Recommended