+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M. Filomena bG. F. C. Camões ... · Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M....

Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M. Filomena bG. F. C. Camões ... · Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M....

Date post: 11-Jan-2020
Category:
Upload: others
View: 6 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
1
Anion Identification Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b , M. Filomena G. F. C. Camões b , Ricardo J. N. Bettencourt da Silva b , Pedro A. S. Salgueiro a a Laboratório de Polícia Científica, PJ, Lisboa, Portugal; b CCMM - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, FCUL, Lisboa, Portugal Many types of explosives have been used in terrorist attacks, however, the number of attacks using improvised explosives (IED) is increasing. In most cases, IEDs are inorganic explosives produced using commercially available materials and/or military explosives. The purpose of forensic analysis of explosives is to identify the used explosive that can link it to a suspect. The identification of inorganic explosives is supported on various composition data, from which relative concentration of major components is particularly relevant. For that, selective and sensitive analytical techniques are required, such as ion chromatography (IC). IC allows the identification and quantification of ionic species in water soluble fraction of explosives and consequently determination of their ionic and mass balance. These balances are supported on the uncertainty of estimated composition data. This study presents the used strategy to control performance of determination of ionic composition of water soluble fraction of explosives including estimated measurement uncertainty using the “bottom-up” approach. Cation Analysis Anion Analysis Qualitative Analysis Analysis of samples between two CS Cation Identification Quantitative Analysis Analysis of samples and a CS between two replicates of a daily curve Cation Quantification Anion Quantification Ionic Balance Identification of the explosive (2) 1 (1) 1 2 (4) 2 + 2 Yes (3) 0− ≤ (99; − 2) × 0 × 0 2 + ´ × 2 IC Analysis Yes 3 4 3 2 + 4 2 Explosive based on ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate Explosive based on ammonium nitrate Ion mol.L -1 NO 3 - (0.030±0.001) NH 4 + (0.0248±0.0007) Ca 2+ (0.00189±0.00003) Ion mol.L -1 NO 3 - (0.0552±0.0025) NH 4 + (0.0470±0.0015) 3 4 + 2 3 2 + ( 4 + 2 ) 2 Cation (min) Lithium 0.086 Sodium 0.092 Ammonium 0.093 Potassium 0.099 Calcium 0.328 Magnesium 0.403 Strontium 0.465 Barium 0.697 Anion (min) Fluoride 0.045 Chloride 0.079 Nitrite 0.071 Bromide and Chlorate 0.155 Nitrate 0.104 Sulfate 0.225 Carbonate 0.151 ´ = 0 0 2 + ´ 1 2 + ´ 5 2 ´ = ´ 1 2 + ´ 2 2 ´ = ´ 0 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 1:2 2 ´ = ´ 0 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 2 + ´ 1:2 2 + ( ´ ) ´ = ´ 1 2 + ´ 2 2 ´ 0 = 0 0 2 + ´ 3 2 V 1 V 2 Rep. Rep. Tol. Cal. Rep. Tol. V f diluted stock solution C Merk Solution Standard Preparation V i stock solution Rep. Cal. Temp. MIon Sample diluition Instrumental Quantification Species Concentration mol/L u interpolation Temp. Uncertainty associated with estimated concentration of CS Uncertainty associated with the reference value of CS from its preparation ´ = ´ 1 2 + ´ 2 2 ´ = 0 0 2 + ´ 3 2 + ´ 5 2 Uncertainty associated with estimated concentration of CS Uncertainty associated with the reference value of CS from its preparation V 1 V 2 Rep. Rep. Tol. Cal. Rep. Tol. V f diluted stock solution Purity Standards Preparation V i diluted stock solution Rep. Cal. Temp. MSolid Sample Diluition Instrumental Quantification Species Concentration mol/L u interpolation Temp. m Solid Cal. Rep. Rep. Tol. Temp. V f stock solution Samples Identification of species and respective quality control Sample results Ionic Balance (mol.L -1 ) (mol.L -1 ) ´ ´ (3) 3.30×10 -5 3.23×10 -5 7.91×10 -2 6.78×10 -3 Yes 5.26×10 -5 5.48×10 -5 1.48×10 -2 6.75×10 -3 Yes 5.40×10 -5 4.94×10 -5 1.30×10 -2 6.78×10 -3 Yes (mol.L -1 ) (mol.L -1 ) ´ ´ (3) 2.93×10 -5 3.23×10 -5 7.45×10 -2 6.78×10 -3 Yes 5.26×10 -5 5.48×10 -5 1.48×10 -2 6.75×10 -3 Yes Quality control of the quantification (4) (1)Eurachem, CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Guide CG4, 2nd edn, Eurachem. (2) International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts ans Associates Terms VIM, 3rd edition, JCGM 200:2008 (4) The internal quality control of the qualitative analysis is based on the repeability limits () determinated during the validation. 1º Step Evaluation of the performance of the procedure, by comparing retention times ( ) of the analyte in standard solutions analysed before and after samples: Criterion (1) 2ºStep Check retention time of sample peaks using criterion (2) Internal quality control of quantitative analysis: The reliability of the measurements is controlled through the analysis of a control standard (CS). The determination of CS composition, 0 , in a daily calibration curve, is checked through the assessment of the metrological compatibility of measurement results with the estimated concentration (C CSPrep ) of CS based on theirs uncertanties (u 0 and u CCSPrep ). Internal quality control of ionic balance: After the quantification of the ionic composition of the aqueous extract of the explosive, the total concentrations of anions ( ) and cations ( ) are compared considering ions charge values. Ionic balance is supported on measurement results reported, with uncertainty, in mol.L -1 units [criterion (4)] The strategy used to the determination of ionic composition of water soluble fraction of explosives and for the internal quality control of tests are based on the results of the validation of the qualitative and quantitative performance of the procedure. The validation of the quantitative measurement procedure involves the assessment of the linearity and homoscedasticity of variance of the IC response, definition of the calibration range, evaluation of the measurement uncertainty and assessment of standard solutions stability. 53,81% 44,50% 1,69% Nitrate Ammonium Calcium 53,99% 46,01% Nitrate Ammonium (1) (2) Ion 6.25 6.21 6.24 Yes Yes NO 3 - 4.05 3.97 3.99 Yes Yes NH 4 + 8.11 7.8 7.69 Yes Yes Ca 2+ (1) (2) Ion 6.22 6.21 6.22 Yes Yes NO 3 - 4.02 3.97 3.99 Yes Yes NH 4 + The developed test quality control strategy ensures the reliable identification and quantification of the ionic composition of water soluble fraction of explosives, including the estimated measurement uncertainty needed for ionic balance assessment. Yes
Transcript
Page 1: Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M. Filomena bG. F. C. Camões ... · Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M. Filomena bG. F. C. Camões , Ricardo J. N. Bettencourt da Silvab, Pedro A. S. Salgueiroa

Anion Identification

Beatriz T. S. F. Brasil a,b, M. Filomena G. F. C. Camõesb, Ricardo J. N. Bettencourt da Silvab, Pedro A. S. Salgueiroa

a Laboratório de Polícia Científica, PJ, Lisboa, Portugal; b CCMM - Departamento de Química e Bioquímica, FCUL, Lisboa, Portugal

Many types of explosives have been used in terrorist attacks, however, the number of attacks using improvised explosives (IED) is increasing. In most cases, IEDs are inorganic explosives produced using commercially available materials and/or military explosives. The purpose of forensic analysis of explosives is to identify the used explosive that can link it to a suspect. The identification of inorganic explosives is supported on various composition data, from which relative concentration of major components is particularly relevant. For that, selective and sensitive analytical techniques are required, such as ion chromatography (IC). IC allows the identification and quantification of ionic species in water soluble fraction of explosives and consequently determination of their ionic and mass balance. These balances are supported on the uncertainty of estimated composition data. This study presents the used strategy to control performance of determination of ionic composition of water soluble fraction of explosives including estimated measurement uncertainty using the “bottom-up” approach.

Cation Analysis Anion Analysis

Qualitative Analysis

Analysis of samples between

two CS

Cation Identification

Quantitative Analysis

Analysis of samples and a CS between two replicates of a

daily curve

Cation Quantification

Anion Quantification

Ionic Balance

Identification of the explosive

(2) 𝑡𝑅𝑠𝑎𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑒 − 𝑡𝑅1 ≤ 𝑟

(1) 𝑡𝑅1 − 𝑡𝑅2 ≤ 𝑟

(4) 𝐶𝐴 − 𝐶𝐶 ≤ 𝑢𝐴2 + 𝑢𝐶

2

Yes

(3) 𝑥0−𝐶𝐶𝑆𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝 ≤ 𝑡 (99; 𝑛 − 2) × u´𝑥0

× 𝑥02 + 𝑢´𝐶𝐶𝑆𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝 × 𝐶𝐶𝐶𝑆𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝

2

IC Analysis

Yes

𝐶𝑁𝑂3− 𝐶𝑁𝐻4

≤ 𝑢𝑁𝑂32 + 𝑢𝑁𝐻4

2

Explosive based on ammonium nitrate and calcium nitrate

Explosive based on ammonium nitrate

Ion mol.L-1

NO3- (0.030±0.001)

NH4+ (0.0248±0.0007)

Ca2+ (0.00189±0.00003)

Ion mol.L-1

NO3- (0.0552±0.0025)

NH4+ (0.0470±0.0015)

𝐶𝑁𝑂3− 𝐶𝑁𝐻4

+ 𝐶𝐶𝑎2

≤ 𝑢𝑁𝑂32 + 𝑢

(𝑁𝐻4+𝐶𝑎2

)2

Cation 𝑟 (min)

Lithium 0.086

Sodium 0.092

Ammonium 0.093

Potassium 0.099

Calcium 0.328

Magnesium 0.403

Strontium 0.465

Barium 0.697

Anion 𝑟 (min)

Fluoride 0.045

Chloride 0.079

Nitrite 0.071

Bromide and Chlorate 0.155

Nitrate 0.104

Sulfate 0.225

Carbonate 0.151

𝑢´𝑥𝑜 = 𝑠𝑥0

𝑥0

2

+ 𝑢´𝐹𝑣12 + 𝑢´𝑡𝑜𝑙 5𝑚𝐿

2

𝑢´𝐶𝑃𝐶𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝= 𝑢´𝐹𝑣1

2 + 𝑢´𝐹𝑣22

𝑢𝑦´ = 𝑠´

𝑥02 + 𝑢´𝑀𝑒𝑟𝑘

2 + 𝑢´𝐹𝑣

2 + 𝑢´𝑀𝑖𝑜𝑛

2 + 𝑢´𝑉1:2

2 𝑢𝑦´ = 𝑠´

𝑥02 + 𝑢´𝑃𝑢𝑟𝑖𝑡𝑦

2+ 𝑢´

𝑚2 + 𝑢´

𝑀𝑆𝑎𝑙𝑡2 + 𝑢´

𝑉2 + 𝑢´

𝑉1:22 + (𝑢´

𝐹𝑣 )

𝑢´𝐶𝐶𝑆𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝= 𝑢´𝐹𝑣1

2 + 𝑢´𝐹𝑣22

𝑢´𝑥0 = 𝑠𝑥0

𝑥0

2

+ 𝑢´𝐹𝑣32

V1

V2

Rep.

Rep.

Tol.

Cal.

Rep. Tol.

Vf diluted stock

solution

CMerk Solution

Standard Preparation

Vi stock solution

Rep.

Cal.

Temp.

MIon

Sample diluition

Instrumental Quantification

Species Concentration mol/L

u interpolation

Temp.

Uncertainty associated with estimated concentration of CS

Uncertainty associated with the reference value of CS from its preparation

𝑢´𝐶𝐶𝑆𝑃𝑟𝑒𝑝= 𝑢´𝐹𝑣1

2 + 𝑢´𝐹𝑣22

𝑢´𝑥𝑜 = 𝑠𝑥0

𝑥0

2

+ 𝑢´𝐹𝑣32 + 𝑢´𝑡𝑜𝑙𝑝𝑖𝑝5𝑚𝐿

2

Uncertainty associated with estimated concentration of CS

Uncertainty associated with the reference value of CS from its preparation

V1

V2

Rep.

Rep.

Tol.

Cal.

Rep. Tol.

Vf diluted stock solution

Purity

Standards Preparation

Vi diluted stock solution

Rep.

Cal.

Temp.

MSolid

Sample Diluition

Instrumental Quantification

Species Concentration mol/L

u interpolation

Temp.

m Solid

Cal.

Rep.

Rep. Tol.

Temp.

Vf stock solution

Samples Identification of species and

respective quality control Sample results Ionic Balance

𝒙𝟎 (mol.L-1)

𝑪𝑪𝑺𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒑 (mol.L-1)

𝐮´𝒙𝟎

𝒖´𝑪𝑪𝑺𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒑 (3)

3.30×10-5 3.23×10-5 7.91×10-2 6.78×10-3 Yes

5.26×10-5 5.48×10-5 1.48×10-2 6.75×10-3 Yes

5.40×10-5 4.94×10-5 1.30×10-2 6.78×10-3 Yes

𝒙𝟎 (mol.L-1)

𝑪𝑪𝑺𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒑 (mol.L-1)

𝐮´𝒙𝟎

𝒖´𝑪𝑪𝑺𝑷𝒓𝒆𝒑 (3)

2.93×10-5 3.23×10-5 7.45×10-2 6.78×10-3 Yes

5.26×10-5 5.48×10-5 1.48×10-2 6.75×10-3 Yes

Quality control of the quantification

(4)

(1)Eurachem, CITAC (2000) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, Guide CG4, 2nd edn, Eurachem. (2) International Vocabulary of Metrology – Basic and General Concepts ans Associates Terms VIM, 3rd edition, JCGM 200:2008

(4)

The internal quality control of the qualitative analysis is based on the repeability limits (𝒓) determinated

during the validation.

1º Step Evaluation of the performance of the procedure, by comparing retention times (𝑡𝑅) of the analyte in standard solutions analysed before and after samples: Criterion (1) 2ºStep Check retention time of sample peaks using criterion (2)

Internal quality control of

quantitative analysis:

The reliability of the measurements is controlled through the analysis of a

control standard (CS). The determination of CS composition, 𝑥0, in a daily

calibration curve, is checked through the assessment of the metrological

compatibility of measurement results with the estimated concentration (CCSPrep)

of CS based on theirs uncertanties (u𝑥0 and uCCSPrep ).

Internal quality control of ionic balance:

After the quantification of the ionic composition of the aqueous extract of the

explosive, the total concentrations of anions (𝐶𝐴) and cations (𝐶𝐶) are compared

considering ions charge values. Ionic balance is supported on

measurement results reported, with uncertainty, in mol.L-1 units [criterion (4)]

The strategy used to the determination of ionic composition of water soluble fraction of explosives and for the internal quality control of tests are based on the results of the validation of the qualitative and quantitative performance of the procedure. The validation of the quantitative measurement procedure involves the assessment of the linearity and homoscedasticity of variance of the IC response, definition of the calibration range, evaluation of the measurement uncertainty and assessment of standard solutions stability.

53,81% 44,50%

1,69%

Nitrate

Ammonium

Calcium

53,99% 46,01% Nitrate

Ammonium

𝒕𝐑𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝐑𝟏 𝒕𝐑𝟐 (1) (2) Ion

6.25 6.21 6.24 Yes Yes NO3-

4.05 3.97 3.99 Yes Yes NH4+

8.11 7.8 7.69 Yes Yes Ca2+

𝒕𝐑𝑺𝒂𝒎𝒑𝒍𝒆 𝒕𝐑𝟏 𝒕𝐑𝟐 (1) (2) Ion

6.22 6.21 6.22 Yes Yes NO3-

4.02 3.97 3.99 Yes Yes NH4+

The developed test quality control strategy ensures the reliable identification and quantification of the ionic composition of

water soluble fraction of explosives, including the estimated measurement uncertainty needed for ionic balance

assessment.

Yes

Recommended