Date post: | 08-May-2015 |
Category: |
Business |
Upload: | mba-corner-by-babasab-patil-karrisatte |
View: | 656 times |
Download: | 1 times |
Leadership Management
Leadership, Management, Accountability and Team Building
Leadership is setting a new direction or vision for a group that they follow. A leader is the spearhead for that new direction.
Management controls or directs people/resources in a group according to principles or values that have already been established.
Team Building is the process of enabling a group of people to reach their goal.
Accountability an obligation or willingness to accept responsibility or to account for one's actions.
Leadership and Management
Leadership without management Sets a direction or vision that others
follow, without considering too much how the new direction is going to be achieved.
Management without leadership Controls resources to maintain the status
quo or ensure things happen according to already-established plans.
Leadership and Management
Leadership combined with management
Does both - sets a new direction and manages the resources to achieve it.
Symbolic Leadership When a leader acts as a figure-head
without setting any direction.
Leadership Qualities
What makes a good leader?
Leadership: Organizational or individual perspective
Organizational: The aim of an organizational perspective is to improve organizational performance by identifying and developing leadership potential.
Leadership: Organizational or individual perspective
The organizational task is therefore one of:
identifying the profile of leadership qualities that will enhance organizational performance;
selecting individuals whose character, skills and potential closely match that profile; and
developing those individuals so their potential becomes a reality.
Leadership: Organizational or individual perspective
Individual: An individual's perspective on leadership is very different:
the aim is for the individual to develop into a position of leadership.
From this perspective, you are who you are and if your leadership qualities are not valued by the organization, then you are going to find it difficult to progress.
Leadership: Organizational or individual perspective
The individual task is therefore one of: understanding one's own leadership
qualities or potential; and selecting an organization or context
where those attributes will be valued
Leadership Styles
Leadership Styles
Modern leadership demands an ability to adapt one's style to achieve the maximum effectiveness.
Excellent leaders are able to take different approaches to suit the various needs of differing situations.
Leadership Styles
Modern leader will: develop flexibility and adaptability to use
any of the styles; recognize the different demands of each
situation; use the style(s) that will give optimum
success.
Eight Leadership Styles
Leadership Styles
I. ACTIVE BLUE: People-oriented, motivator, builds personal relationships, likeable, interpersonal skills, cares for others
When to use Commitment from others is critical, or sensitive
situations When not to use Decisions need to be forced through, conflict is
being avoided
ACTIVE BLUE
People-oriented, motivator,
builds personal relationships,
likeable, interpersonal skills,
cares for others
When to use Commitment from others is critical, or sensitive situations
When not to useDecisions need to
be forced through, conflict is being avoided
Leadership Styles
II. REFLECTIVE BLUE Value-driven, has passion for key issues, focuses on important themes, champions the cause
When to use The group has lost its sense of identity, or it is
doing too many unimportant things When not to use There is a problem that needs to be solved with
dispassionate objectivity (eg: technical issues)
REFLECTIVE BLUE
Value-driven,passion, focuses ,
champions the cause
When to useLost its
sense of identity
When not to use There is a problem that needs to be
solved with objectivity
Leadership Styles
III. ACTIVE GREEN Tries things that are new, prototypes, introduces change, looks for unexpected outcomes, creates new opportunities, experiments
When to use The group is 'stuck in a rut', or the status quo
needs to be challenged When not to use There are already too many initiatives under way
and some stability is needed
ACTIVE GREEN
Tries new things, prototypes,
introduces change, looks for
unexpected outcomes, creates new opportunities, experiments
When to use The group is ‘
stuck in a rut', or the status quo
needs to be challenged
When not to use There are already too
many initiatives under way and
some stability is needed
Leadership Styles
IV. REFLECTIVE GREENDevelops long term vision, produces radical ideas, foresees the future, anticipates what is outside current knowledge.
When to use Radical change is needed, change is a long
term activity When not to use There are immediate dangers, the group may
not survive in the short term
REFLECTIVE GREEN
Visionary, produces radical ideas,
foresees the future, anticipates what is outside
current knowledge.
When to useRadical change is needed,
change is a long term activity
When not to useThere are immediate
dangers, the group may not
survive in the short term
Leadership Styles
V. ACTIVE YELLOW Takes action, produces results, leads from the front, sets an example, does what is asked of others
When to use There is some inertia, or lack of
achievement has destroyed motivation When not to use The group is being too expedient, current
success may ebb in the future
ACTIVE YELLOW
Takes action, produces results,
leads from the front, sets an example,
does what is asked of others
When to useLack of achievement
has destroyed motivation
When not to useThe group is being
too expedient, current success maybe
low in the future
Leadership Styles
VI. REFLECTIVE YELLOW Observes, listens, clarifies goals, establishes realistic expectations, makes aims crystal clear
When to use The direction is vague or expectations have
not been articulated When not to use There are already too many goals or too
much information
REFLECTIVE YELLOW
Observes, listens,
clarifies goals, establishes realistic
expectations, makes aims crystal clear
When to useThe direction is vague
or expectations have
not been articulated
When not to useAlready too
many goals or too much information
Leadership Styles
VII. ACTIVE REDOrganizes, makes plans, sets measurable goals, coordinates work of different people, manages resources
When to use There is chaos/lack of organization, or
there are no measures of achievement When not to use There are so many processes that creativity
has been stifled
ACTIVE RED
Organizes, makes plans, sets measurable goals,
coordinates work of different people,
manages resources
When to use There is chaos/lack of organization, or
there are no measures of achievement
When not to use There are so many
processes that creativity
has been stifled
Leadership Styles
VIII. REFLECTIVE REDAnalyses, uses models, produces explanations, compares other situations, engages in intellectual debate
When to use The situation is complex or driven by
technical solutions When not to use People's feelings are paramount, or the
group go round in circular arguments
REFLECTIVE RED
Analyses, uses models,
produces explanations, compares other
situations, engages in
intellectual debate
When to useThe situation is complex or
driven by technical solutions
When not to usePeople's feelings are
paramount, or the group go round in
circular arguments
Leadership In Head Start
Grantee and delegate agency must propose, within the framework of these regulations, the size of the policy groups ,the procedures for the election of parent members, and the procedure for the selection of community representatives.
Leadership In Head Start
Grantee and delegate agencies must have written policies that define the roles and responsibilities of the governing body members and that inform them of the management procedures and functions necessary to implement a high quality program.
Grantee and delegate agencies must ensure that appropriate internal controls are established and implemented to safeguard Federal funds in accordance with 45 CFR 1301.13.
Leadership In Head Start
Grantee and delegate agencies must develop and implement a systematic, ongoing process of program planning;
Grantees must establish and implement procedures for the ongoing monitoring of their own Early Head Start and Head Start operations, as well as those of each of their delegate agencies, to ensure that these operations effectively implement Federal regulations.
Management
Performance and Change Management
Performance Management
Performance Management is a process aimed at improving performance (eg: achievement of program objectives).
Performance Management" is used in two contexts:
A way of maximizing performance of an individual, team or organization
A process for dealing with underperforming individuals (or teams).
Performance Management Principles
I. Measurement Establish performance measures
(eg: sales turnover) Establish measurable behavioral goals
that will improve performance (eg: making 30 prospective phone calls a day)
Measure current behaviors (eg: logging actual phone calls)
Measurement Establish
performance measures
sales turnover
Establish measurable
behavioral goals 30 calls a day
Measure current
behaviors
Performance Management Principles
II. Appraisal Compare the current behaviors with the
behavioral goals and identify the differences (eg: on average, 20 phone calls are actually being made, giving a shortfall of 10 phone calls).
Appraisal
Compare the current behaviors
20 phone calls
Behavioral goals 30 calls a day
The difference 10 calls
Performance Management Principles
III. Action For each difference, plan how to bring actual
behaviors in line with the goals, in order to improve the performance (eg: introduce a revised telephone script that qualifies the prospect more quickly, shortening each phone call and enabling more calls to be made in the time available)
Implement the plan (eg: issue the revised script to all telesales people, perhaps with some training to support its use)
Action
Actual behavior20 phone calls
Behavioral goals 30 calls a day
Improve PerformanceI. Revised script
II. Shortening callsIII. Enable more calls
Implement the plan I. Issue revised script
II. Train Staff
Performance Management Principles
IV. Monitoring Check to see if the new plans are being
followed (eg: review a sample of phone call recordings to determine whether the new script is being used and check that it is 'workable').
At appropriate times, return to the appraisal stage to assess the impact of the changes on the behavioral and performance measures (eg: review the average number of calls made per day and sales achieved).
MonitoringCheck new plans
I. Revised scriptII. Shortening calls
III. Enable more calls
New Plans I. Review callsto see if script
is followedII. Check to see if its
workable
Return to Appraisal
Compare the current behaviors
Behavioral goals
The difference
Performance Management
Principles
Measurement Appraisal MonitoringAction
Maximum vs. Poor Performance
Maximum performance 1. Collaboration between
management and staff 2. Can be informal, with
written records only recording revised targets
3. A process, one of constant improvement
4. Often involves analysis of the process
Poor performance 1. Involves more
confrontation 2. A formal process with
each step being written down
3. A process that escalates into disciplinary proceedings and possible termination
4. Often involves analysis of one individual's behaviors/attitudes
Performance Management
Waste of Potentially Good Ideas Failure to listen and comment when
workers offer suggestions. Failure to encourage workers to offer
suggestions. Not asking workers advice on problems. Failure to read and study about the work
and about business methods.
Performance Management
Failure to get from new employees helpful ideas which they may bring from previous employment.
Not consulting enough with other departments, such as technology, etc.
Failure to consider or refer to the proper person all usable suggestions no matter where they come from.
Performance Management
Failure to take proper interest in meetings.
Failure to benchmark performance of organization with other similar organizations and the sector as a whole.
Management in Head Start
All Early Head Start and Head Start grantee and delegate agencies must use funds from USDA Food and Consumer Services Child Nutrition Programs as the primary source of payment for meal services.
Grantee and delegate agencies operating center-based programs must establish and implement policies and procedures to respond to medical and dental health emergencies with which all staff are familiar and trained.
Management in Head Start
Grantee and delegate agencies must ensure that all staff, consultants, and volunteers abide by the program's standards of conduct.
The organizational structure must address the major functions and responsibilities assigned to each staff position and must provide evidence of adequate mechanisms for staff supervision and support.
Management in Head Start
Grantee and delegate agencies must establish and maintain efficient and effective record-keeping systems to provide accurate and timely information regarding children, families, and staff and must ensure appropriate confidentiality of this information.
Establishing a Team
How to functions as a team
Team Building
Stages in team building: Clarify the team goals and objectives Identify those issues which inhibit the
team from reaching their goals and objectives
Address the issues, remove the inhibitors and enable the goals and objectives to be achieved
Team Building
Team Building ScaleIndividual skills and perceptions
Relationships between teams
Relationships between people
The culture of the organization
Team Dynamics
Team Dynamics
Team Dynamics are the unseen forces that operate in a team between different groups of people.
For example, in a small team of six people, there may be two people who have a particularly strong friendship.
Friendship is a "natural force" that may have an influence on the rest of the team, and can affect the team positively or negatively.
Team Dynamics
The positive effect of a strong friendship in a team might be:
friends communicate a lot together ...which naturally results in other members
being drawn into the discussion ...which results in a good 'social' feel to the
group ...which makes people enjoy being in the group ...which improves motivation and commitment
Team Dynamics
The negative effect of a strong friendship might be:
to cause other people to feel excluded... ... are less likely to include the friends in decision
making ... are likely to be in groups …information may not flow across the whole
group, but only within the subgroups … miscommunication may lead to
misunderstanding and poor collective performance
Team Dynamics
How do you recognize team dynamics? Personality styles (eg: including or excluding
people) Team Roles Office layout (eg: cupboards dividing teams into
two) Tools and technology (eg: email, bulletin board,
information pool enabling hidden communication).
Team Dynamics
Organizational culture (eg: company cars acting as status symbols to separate groups of employees)
Processes/methodologies/procedures (eg: problem-solving methodology) etc.
Team Dynamics
How can team dynamics be managed constructively?
look for the team dynamics - the 'natural forces' at play
determine whether they are acting for good or ill,
make interventions to make the effect of those dynamics more positive.
Accountability
Owning It: How PersonalAccountability Can Transform an
Organization
Accountability
For organizations that consistently struggle to meet goals, worker accountability may be an issue.
Symptoms of accountability deficiencies include -blaming and finger-pointing, -unclear and changing expectations and -difficulty retaining quality employees. When any or all of these issues occur,
organizations should consider transforming their employees’ behaviors and attitudes with the power of personal accountability.
Accountability
When employees take ownership of tasks and plans are clear, personal accountability emerges,
-lowering stress, -increasing productivity, -influencing job satisfaction and -propelling the organization to meet its
goals and objectives.
Accountability Deficiencies
Blame and Finger-Pointing
When personal accountability is absent, pinning the blame on others is one of the most common behaviors employees engage in when things go wrong.
Do any of these charges sound familiar? § "It's because of those strict regulations." § "Our partner dropped the ball." § “Parents just don't participate." § “The warehouse doesn’t delivery supplies
timely."
Blame and Finger-Pointing
Blame and finger-pointing stem from a lack of personal accountability and a fear of punishment.
In this type of environment, employees talk about – rather than to – each other.
Also, informal meetings that occur after meetings (hallway discussions), are where real opinions are heard.
Blame and Finger-Pointing
When employees equate being “held accountable” with demotion or job loss, they will refrain from accepting responsibility for the outcomes of their work.
If the manager doesn’t model accountability, blame and finger-pointing will be the norm for their employees.
Blame and Finger-Pointing
When an accountable employee does something wrong, he or she will say, "This is what I did, and I accept responsibility.
This is what I learned from my mistake and this is how I will change."
Unclear and Changing Expectations
When managers lack personal accountability, they are often unclear with their expectations or routinely change objectives, resulting in confusion and incomplete goals.
Unclear and Changing Expectations
Unclear: § "Diversity is very
important and we will embrace it."
§ "We will change our IT systems to keep up with the times."
§ "We will focus on innovation this year."
Clear: § “To embrace our
diversity, we will be implementing monthly diversity awareness seminars.”
§ “We need to update our firewalls to keep up with the latest viruses.”
§ “Our focus on innovation this year will require us to brainstorm better service techniques and processes, and improve quality.”
Sample Expectations
Unclear and Changing Expectations
Without any kind of clarity, the outcome of these types of expectations is no outcome at all.
Employees want to know what road to travel, the tasks they need to accomplish and milestones along the way.
Unclear and Changing Expectations
To hold employees accountable, -tasks must be clearly defined up-front, -the expected outcomes must be
explained, -the stakes of completing/not completing
the task made clear, and -all parties must agree upon action steps
by certain dates.
Difficulty Retaining Quality Employees
Often a lack of accountability leads to equal rewards for unequal efforts among employees, spurring the best workers to see no value in working hard to further the goals of the organization.
High achievers will ultimately leave organizations that do not hold employees accountable.
Difficulty Retaining Quality Employees
When a lack of measurement exists, good employees will not prosper.
To retain high achievers, everyone must be held accountable for their actions.
Other Challenges
Additional symptoms that point to a lack of accountability :
§ Ineffective teamwork § Poor meeting management § Indirect and unclear communication § Gossip § Conflict
Personal Accountability Training
Personal accountability training is an effective way to shift the corporate mindset to one of responsibility, empowerment and accountability
Purpose of personal accountability training
I. Help employees understand the importance of accountability
II. Identify why the organization values accountable employees
III. Discuss each individual's role in the process, and
IV. Encourage employees to reexamine their attitudes and actions.
The Challenges of Poor Workforce Accountability
When everything is working well, accountability is understood and embraced in an organization. However, when problems emerge, excuses seem to be the acceptable alternative.
Some of the most common signs that personal accountability is absent includes
blaming others, nebulous expectations and the inability to retain high achievers.
Steps to Achieving PersonalAccountability
Workers must take ownership of a task and its outcome at the time it was assigned.
Employees must have a preexisting mindset that they can and will get tasks accomplished.
Once employees take responsibility, a clear agreement must be in place between the task assigner and the task owner.
Steps to Achieving PersonalAccountability
The agreement must clearly articulate the task, the expected results and when it must be completed.
Employees must be willing to take personal action to see the results occur.
Employees must be willing to answer for outcomes, whether good or bad.
Benefits of Accountable Employees
§ Personal action is taken to overcome obstacles and ensure results are achieved
§ Results are on target because the task, owner, expected results and deadline are clear
§ Individuals display a willingness to answer for the results of their actions
Benefits of Accountable Employees
§ Productivity increases because employees, teams and entire departments are more effective and individuals agree to own tasks
§ Job satisfaction improves because tasks are clearly defined and success occurs more
§ Negative events become learning events § Workarounds and project restarts are
significantly reduced
Head Start Accountability
Every year, each agency must conduct and maintain a “Program Self Assessment”.
Every three years, a Head Start grantee must conduct and maintain a “Community Assessment,” designed to ensure that the program is serving the greatest number of eligible children in the local area. Updated annually
Head Start Accountability
Every Head Start program must conduct a “Wage Comparability” study every three years to assure that wages paid to Head Start staff are in line with those paid for comparable jobs in the community served by that Head Start grantee.
Head Start Accountability
Each program must provide every enrolled child with dental, mental health and health screenings, along with a developmental screening, and maintain files on the results of these screenings.
For each child with a disability, a “Transition Plan” must be maintained and implemented in accordance with IDEA.
Head Start Accountability
Local programs must have written agreements with vendors and service providers and community partners.
Each program must meet the performance standards for each child and family and have documentation of such progress (individualized family plans, child’s education plan, etc.).
Head Start Accountability
Every three years, USDA conducts an on-site audit with respect to the eligibility of children in the program and on food servings (making sure that each meal has met the Daily Requirements).
State and Local Requirements; i.e. state child care licensing standards.