8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 2/34
Bedform & Flow Regim
- A bedform is a feature that develops at the interfaand a moveable bed, the result of bed material be
by fluid flow.
- Flow regime relates bedforms in alluvial channels
velocity. The classification also shows the relations
between flow velocity and the mode of sediment tr
the concentration of sediment being transported a
phase relation between the bed and the water (wa
surface).
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 3/34
Flow regime and its relationship to bed forms and other charac
(Lewis, 1984)
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 4/34
Froude number & Flow regime
• F <1 tranquil flow (lower flow regime)
• F = 1 critical flow conditions (flow regime transition)
• F> 1 rapid flow (upper flow regime)
In general, the basic shape of the flow regime, sediment is classified into• A. Regime low flow
• B. Regime transition flow
• C. Regime high flow
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 5/34
A. REGIME LOW
(Froude number <0.4 to 1 with ramps transition)
Consist of :
• Flat bed
• Ripples
• Dunes
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 6/34
Flat bed, is a sediment transport wdeformation and the movement detatossing and turning. And the magnitu
the shear of stress is exactly above frocritical.
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 8/34
DUNES, ALL SIZES OF SEDIMENT AND THE SH
OF STRESS INCREASES TO THE FRONT SIDE
FRONT SIDE IS SLOPE SLIGHTLY, THE BACK SIS STEEPER. EROSION CAN OCCUR ON ALL S
OF THE UPPER REACHES, AND DEPOSITION
OCCURS AT THE BOTTOM OF THE DOWNSTR
SIDE.
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 10/34
C REGIME
HIGH FLOW
(Froude Number> 0.4 to 1, a relatively small flow resistan
and large sediment’s transport)
Consist of :
• Plane bed
• Antidunes
• Chute and Pools
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 11/34
PLANE BED, HAS A FLOWRATE GRADUALLYRISING, SEDIMENT
TRANSPORT HAS A FLATHEIGHT. THE MOVEMENT
OF THE GRAIN ISROLLING OR SLIDINGAND CHANGES AT A
PARTICULAR PLACE. AFINE MATERIAL OCCURS
SALTASI.
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 13/34
Chute and Pools, occurs in the slope, velocity andsediment discharge which are relatively large. Thebasic form is a hill - a large sediment hill. The stateof the flow in chute is supercritical or subcritical.
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 14/34
Bedform Forecast
Description:
• s = specific weight of bed material
• y = height of bedform at x along the river
• t = time
• qs = sediment flow in a weight unity wide and time
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 15/34
The first limitation showed a decrease in the rate of
the base, and the second limit sediment transport s
change in the change of the distance x along the rivout that both these limits gradually always opposite
when the base is formed
positive
negative
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 16/34
The cross-sectional shape at time t and t + dt from
bedform that moves downstream.
In the upper part of the lower forms of the basicsituation which is a function of time, so
negative
positive
EXNER (1925) ASSUMED THAT
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 17/34
EXNER (1925), ASSUMED THAT:QS = AO. UO
AO = CONSTANT
UO = FLOW VELOCITY NEAR THE BASE
BY ENTERING AO AND UO INTO THE SEDIMEQUALITION CONTINUITY BEFORE, THEN O:
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 20/34
The concept of "lag
distance" was firstproposed by Kenne
(1963) and is the moimportant factor
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 21/34
Fr and kdSeen in Fr2, great
/ kd) tanh kd, and t
Curve Fr2 = (1 / kdgive upper limit for
and dunes Fr. Tran
area between Fr =
= 0.844
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 22/34
Relationship between the wavelength L
antidunes with average speed U as follow
Known as the equation for the wave spe
in the water
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 23/34
Conclution :
Passed antidunes surface waves break wh
position is steep. Comparison between wave h
wavelength is between 0.13 and 0.16 and betw
retrieved value is 0.14 for the water wave steep
the time began to break
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 24/34
alluvial roughnessIn an alluvial channel, the various regimes of bed formare the results of complicated interactions between the
overlying flow and the mobile bed sediments.
Why???
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 25/34
Because… The physics of bed form is complicated because tflow boundary is not fixed but changes dynamica
according to the sediment characteristics, channshape and flow strength, among other factors. Tvariable bed forms modify the flow resistance atherefore the stage-discharge relationship of tchannel conveyance. The mobile bed resistandepends on many interrelated factors including the sor grain resistance and form drag or bed fo
resistance. The former is dependent on the depth flow and grain size at the boundary surface while tlatter is the resistance associated with the edformations and secondary circulations set up by tflow over the bed form.
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 26/34
• ρ= fluid density
• g= gravitational acceleration• R= hydraulic radius related to bed
• S= energy slope
τ0=ρgRS
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 28/34
Divide hydraulic roughness to 2parts: R’ and R’’
Which is R=R’+R’’
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 29/34
Th d t t pgR
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 30/34
They assumed a constant pgRon both sides of equation (2)andintroduced an alternativeapproach based on the directsummation of two energyslopes. Equation (2) becomes
S=S’+S”
Th G hi b E l d H
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 31/34
The Graphic by Engelund-Hansen
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 32/34
Lovera-Kennedy 1969) and Alam-
Kennedy 1969)
Restrictions for Lovera-Kennedy dan AlKennedy:
• Base sediment characteristic =D50
• Limited analysis for gravel and water
• Gravity reaction=0 and there is no freewaves
The analysis result is: λ ’=f(Re=(U.R)/v.R/• v= kinematic viscosity of fluid
• R= hydraulic radius
• λ ’=friction factor Darcy Weisbach
Reference:
8/10/2019 Bedform Alluvial (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/bedform-alluvial-2 33/34
Reference: • Priyantoro, Dwi. 1987,Teknik Pengangkutan
Sedimen, Himpunan Mahasiswa Pengairan FT-UB,Malang
• Engelund, F., and E. Hansen (1967), A monographon sediment transport in alluvial streams, report,
Tech. Univ. of Denmark, Copenhagen.• Einstein, H. A., and N. L. Barbarossa (1952), River
channel roughness, Trans. Am. Soc. Civ. Eng., 117,1121 – 1146.
• Kennedy, J. F. (1963), The mechanics of dunes andantidunnes in erodiblebed channels, J. Fluid Mech.,16(4), 521 – 544.
• Chien, N., and Z. Wan (1999), Mechanics ofSediment Transport, Am. Soc. of Civ. Eng., Reston,Va