+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Date post: 02-Apr-2015
Category:
Upload: sadefkarish
View: 329 times
Download: 9 times
Share this document with a friend
30
Mumbai to Kasara Ghat Highway
Transcript
Page 1: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Mumbai to Kasara Ghat Highway

Page 2: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Index

Summary

Drive Test Results

- Idle mode foot print

- Call metrics

- Handover Success Rate

- Rx Qualityy

Capacity Utilization – Highway sites

Detailed analysis – Patch wiseDetailed analysis Patch wise

confidential2 of 30

Page 3: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

SummaryDrive test Results

Target RCOM GSM RCOM CDMA TATA CDMA VodafoneTechnology GSM CDMA CDMA GSM

Band of operation (MHz) 1800 800 800 900/1800

Hi h l th (k ) 68 68 68 68

Drive test Results

Highway length (km) 68 68 68 68Route covered (km) 68 68 68 68

No. of Sites 22 15 19 27

% of route with good outdoor coverage >-85dBm 79% 81% 85% 87%CSSR (%) >=98% 90 52% 94 83% 95 69% 97 20%CSSR (%) 98% 90.52% 94.83% 95.69% 97.20%

Call Drop (%) ≤ 1.5% 18.10% 10% 4.50% 3%Rx Quality DL % >=97% 80.19% 92.49% 96% 94%

Handover Success Rate (%) >=96% 97.99% 100% 100% 100%Call Set up Time (Sec.) 4.66 2.54 2.02 4.15

F TTITarget

RCOM GSMTarget

RCOM CDMA

No. of cells 67 No. of cells 33

SDCCH Completion Rate (BBH) >=98% >=90% 67 Paging Channel Occupancy <= 80% >=90% 33TCH Completion Rate (BBH) >=97.5% >=90% 51 TCH Call Completion Rate (BBH) >=98% >=90% 19

From TTI

Handover Success Rate (BBH) >=95% >=90% 62 Handover Success Rate (BBH) >=97% >=90% 33SDCCH Assignment Success (BBH) >=99% >=90% 67 Forward SCH Data Rate (DBBH > 70 Kpbs * ) >=90% 29TCH Assignment Success (BBH) >=97% >=90% 60 Call Setup Success rate (BBH) >=97% >=90% 27RX Quality DL (0-5) (BBH) >=94% >=90% 60 RF ASSIGNMENT success rate (BBH) >=98% >=90% 33Random Access Success Rate (BBH) >=95% >=90% 64 Call Quality (RFER) <2% >=90% 8

confidential

Average BBH traffic/ cell 6.43 Erl Average BBH traffic/ cell 8.98 Erl

3 of 30

Page 4: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Drive test results

Idle mode footprintCSSRC ll DCall DropsHandover Success RateRx Quality

Page 5: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Route

Mumbai-Kasara Ghat HighwayRoute

Highway length (km) : 68Highway length (km) : 68 Route driven (km) : 68

Date of testing: 23-Aug-10

Sites :RCOM GSM : 22RCOM CDMA : 15Vodafone : 27TTSL : 19

RCOM GSM SiteRCOM CDMA SitRCOM CDMA Site

confidential5 of 30

Page 6: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Idle mode coverageRCOM GSM Vodafone

Kasara Village

Kasara Village

Talawali Village

Walshind VillageVillage

confidential6 of 30

Page 7: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Coverage Plot (MTx)RCOM CDMA TTSL

Kasara Village

Kasara Village

Walshind Village

TaloliVillage

Anjurdive

confidential7 of 30

Page 8: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Coverage comparison

confidential8 of 30

Page 9: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

RCOM GSM

GSM_Coverage gap – Action planRCOM GSM

Action Plan:Planned siteSites planned Kasara

Village

Talawali Village

RCOM Support requirement:Sites MH8BHWND017_10 & MH8BHWND016 10 & Walshind _MH8SASPR001_10 are already proposed in the current roll out plan.

Village

If there is new site requirement, pls specify how many of the same is already part of current rollout plan

confidential

p p

9 of 30

Page 10: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

RCOM CDMA

CDMA_Coverage gap – Action planRCOM CDMA

Planned sites

Near Pethechapada to

Action Plan is attached here in the sheet below:

Pethechapada

apada to Kasara

Raj laxmiRaj laxmi compound to vadpe village

Microsoft Excel Worksheet

If there is new site requirement, pls specify how many of the same is already part of current rollout plan

Dapoda to Bhiwandi Bye pass

confidential

p p

10 of 30

Page 11: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Call Metrics

confidential11 of 30

Page 12: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

CSSR

Call Metrics – Action plan

Action Plan: Calls blocking is mainly due to congestion in the cells, which is

CSSR

g y gexpected to be cut with new sites, which are already proposed in the current roll out plan. (See details on Slide no. 9).

RCOM Support requirement:

Call drop

Action Plan: Call drops are due to poor coverage, quality as we can see the poor Interference & FER also. Physical optimization required. Majorly, network is affected due to coverage issues.RCOM Support requirement:RCOM Support requirement:Sites MH8BHWND017_10 & MH8BHWND016_10 & MH8SASPR001_10 are already proposed in the current roll out plan.

confidential12 of 30

Page 13: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Handover & Rx QualityH d R t Q /Handover success Rate Rx Quality DL / FFER

Action Plan: Action Plan:

The FER value agreed to be meeting KPI is <=2%.

Action Plan:Neighbor tuning with physical optimization required.

RCOM Support requirement:

Action Plan:Physical Optimization neededto reduce interference of the network.

RCOM Support requirement:

confidential13 of 30

Page 14: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Rx Quality PlotRCOM GSM Vodafone

Kasara Village

Walshind Village

ABC Village

WalshindVillage Walshind Village

kalyanVillage

confidential14 of 30

Page 15: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

FFER PlotRCOM CDMA TTSL

Kasara Village

Walshind Village

Walshind Village

kalyanVillage

Village

kalyanVillage

confidential15 of 30

Page 16: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

C/I average PlotRCOM GSM Vodafone

confidential16 of 30`

Page 17: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Ec/Io combined PlotRCOM CDMA TTSL

KasaraVillage

KasaraVillage

confidential17 of 30

Page 18: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

GSM Handover FailureRCOM GSM Vodafone

Kasara Ghat

Khardi village

Ghat

Dapoda village

Thane-Nasik hwy bridge

Thane-Nasik hwy bridge

confidential18 of 30

Page 19: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

CDMA Handoff FailureRCOM CDMA TTSL

confidential19 of 30

Page 20: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Capacity UtilizationRCOM GSM RCOM CDMA

Total Cells 67 Total Cells 33

<15% Utilization 10 <15% Utilization 20

>15% to <30% 15 >15% to <30% 8>15% to <30% 15 >15% to <30% 8

>30% to <50% 23 >30% to <50% 3

>50% to <70% 13 >50% to <70% 1

>70% to <90% 3 >70% <90% 1

>90% to <100% 3 >90% to <100% 0

>100% 0 >100% 0

Action Plan:

RCOM Support requirement:

Action Plan:

RCOM Support requirement:RCOM Support requirement: RCOM Support requirement:

confidential20 of 30

Page 21: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Detailed analysis

For each drive test stretch

Page 22: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

GSM-Location of call blocking

High utilized cellCall attempt failuresPlanned sites

Kasara Ghat

Majorly, Call attempt failures are due to coverage issue &are due to coverage issue & new sites MH8BHWND017_10 & MH8BHWND016_10 & MH8SASPR001_10 are

l d d i thalready proposed in the current roll out plan. Also, Due to high utilization of cells MH_BHWND_035_11@2 & MH_BHWND_034_11@3,

Phadge village

_ _ _ @Call attempt failures occur.

Thane-

confidential

Nasik hwy bridge

22 of 30

Page 23: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

CDMA-Location of call blockingCall blocked reasons :

•Pethechapada-Beta Sector of the site were having hardware issue as it was newly integrated site which

Kasara Ghat

it was newly integrated site which has been rectified.

•New Water Plant Kalyan- Wadpe site (Gamma Sector) has been bl k d b th hill t itblocked by the hill near to it as resulting in poor MTX. Google snap is attach for the area.

Phadge village

confidential23 of 30

Page 24: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

GSM - Location of call drops

Kasara Ghat

Khardi village

Phadge

Asan gaon

Thane-Nasik hwy bridge

D d

village

Dapoda village

confidential24 of 30

Page 25: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

CDMA - Location of call drops

Kasara Ghat

Action Plan is attached here in the sheet below:

Khardi village

Phadge Action Plan for the

Call Drop

Thane-Nasik hwy bridge D d

village

bridge Dapoda village

confidential25 of 30

Page 26: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

GSM_Detail Analysis of Drop Call

Call drops are due to poor coverage, quality as we can see the poor Interference & FER also. Physical optimization

i d M j l t k ff t d d t

confidential

required. Majorly, network was affected due to coverage issues.

26 of 30

Page 27: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

GSM_Detail Analysis of Rx Quality

Kasara Ghat

Khardi village

Asan gaon

Vasind

D d

Phadge village

village

Poor Rx Quality is due to poor coverage as we can see the poor Interference , FER. Physical optimization required for

Thane-Nasik hwy

Dapoda village

confidential

p , y p qthe above mentioned Cell Ids. Majorly, network was affected due to coverage issues for which new sites are proposed. (See slide no. 9).

Nasik hwy bridge

27 of 30

Page 28: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

CDMA_Detail Analysis of FFER

Kasara Ghat

Action Plan is attached here in the sheet

Khardi village

here in the sheet below:

Microsoft Excel Worksheet

D d

Phadge village

Thane-Nasik hwy

Dapoda village

confidential

Nasik hwy bridge

28 of 30

Page 29: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Detail Analysis of Handover

HO failure is observed on CI 52193, due to weak coverage O a u e s obse ed o C 5 93, due to ea co e ageissues, sites are at distance of 3km. New sites are proposed (See slide no. 9).

confidential29 of 30

Page 30: Benchmarking drive test _Highway

Thank You


Recommended