+ All Categories
Home > Science > Beneath our boots final 21042016

Beneath our boots final 21042016

Date post: 07-Apr-2017
Category:
Upload: derrick-mcclure
View: 175 times
Download: 1 times
Share this document with a friend
29
Beneath our boots … Surface Geochemistry 2016 HUMANS DISCOVERED MOST OF THEIR ESSENTIAL RESOURCES BY SIMPLY KEEPING THEIR EYES OPEN….
Transcript
Page 1: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Beneath our boots …

Surface Geochemistry 2016HUMANS DISCOVERED MOST OF THEIR ESSENTIAL RESOURCES BY SIMPLY KEEPING THEIR EYES OPEN….

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Good evening Fellow Explorers
Page 2: Beneath our boots final 21042016

SAFE HARBOUR FOR FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS & INDEMNITY FOR BACKWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS &

ASSURANCE FOR SIDEWAYS-LOOKING STATEMENTS

THIS DOCUMENT INCLUDES WORDS AND TERMS IN THIS PRESS RELEASE OR OTHER DOCUMENT THAT APPEAR TO ADDRESS ACTIVITIES, EVENTS OR DEVELOPMENTS THAT RSD EXPECTS, BELIEVES OR ANTICIPATES WILL OR MAY OCCUR IN THE FUTURE ARE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE STATEMENTS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS RELATED TO ACQUISITIONS, TRADES OR DIVESTITURES, TIMING AND PAYMENT OF DISTRIBUTIONS, TAXES AND THE EXPECTATIONS OF PLANS, STRATEGIES, OBJECTIVES AND ANTICIPATED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS OF RSD, INCLUDING RSD'S DRILLING PROGRAM, PRODUCTION PROGRAM, SAMPLING PROGRAM, BOTTLING PROGRAM, HEDGING ACTIVITIES, DITCHING ACTIVITIES, CAPITAL EXPENDITURE LEVELS AND OTHER GUIDANCE INCLUDED IN THIS PRESS RELEASE. THESE STATEMENTS ARE BASED ON CERTAIN ASSUMPTIONS MADE BY RSD BASED ON MANAGEMENT'S EXPERIENCE AND PERCEPTION OF PAST, CURRENT AND FUTURE CONDITIONS, HISTORICAL TRENDS, ANTICIPATED FUTURE DEVELOPMENTS AND OTHER FACTORS BELIEVED TO BE APPROPRIATE. SUCH STATEMENTS ARE SUBJECT TO A NUMBER OF ASSUMPTIONS, RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, VIRTUALLY ALL OF WHICH ARE BEYOND THE CONTROL OF RSD, WHICH MAY CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE IMPLIED OR EXPRESSED BY THE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THESE INCLUDE RISKS RELATING TO RSD'S FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE AND RESULTS, AVAILABILITY OF SUFFICIENT CASH FLOW TO PAY DISTRIBUTIONS AND EXECUTE ITS BUSINESS PLAN, PRICES AND DEMAND FOR OIL, NATURAL GAS AND NATURAL GAS LIQUIDS, THE ABILITY TO REPLACE RESERVES AND EFFICIENTLY DEVELOP CURRENT RESERVES AND OTHER IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE PROJECTED MAY BE DESCRIBED IN RSD'S REPORTS FILED WITH THE AUTHORITIES. PLEASE READ "RISK FACTORS" IN RSD'S ANNUAL REPORT FOR 1974 AND OTHER PUBLIC FILINGS AND PRESS RELEASES.

ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT SPEAKS ONLY AS OF THE DATE ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENT WAS DREAMT UP AND RSD UNDERTAKES NO OBLIGATION TO MODIFY CORRECT OR UPDATE ANY FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT, WHETHER AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.

ANY SIDEWAYS-LOOKING STATEMENTS MAY CONSIST OF A FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT OR A BACKWARD LOOKING STATEMENT VIEWED FROM ONE SIDE OR ANOTHER, DEPENDENT UPON THE SITUATION OF THE TIME MACHINE AT ANY ONE SPECIFIED POINT OF TIME, AND MAY SPEAK ONLY AS OF THE DATE ON WHICH SUCH STATEMENT WAS DREAMT UP AND RSD UNDERTAKES NO OBLIGATION TO MODIFY CORRECT OR UPDATE ANY SIDEWAYS-LOOKING STATEMENT, WHETHER AS A RESULT OF NEW INFORMATION, FUTURE EVENTS OR OTHERWISE.

CONTACT: RSD THROUGH THE SPEAKER.

THE PAPER IS TOTALLY UNAUTHORISED BY HIS CURRENT EMPLOYER AND ANY RESEMBLANCE TO INDIVIDUALS (LIVING OR DECEASED) WILL BE PURELY COINCIDENTAL.

RSD HAS USED REASONABLE ENDEAVOURS TO ENSURE THE ACCURACY OF THE WORK CONTAINED WITHIN THIS DOCUMENT BUT DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE WORK WILL NOT CONTAIN ERRORS AND SHALL NOT BE LIABLE FOR ANY LOSS CONSEQUENT UPON THE EXISTENCE OF SUCH ERRORS OR ANY OTHER CONSEQUENTIAL LOSSES THAT MIGHT ARISE.

THIS COMMUNICATION WAS CONCOCTED BY THE LAGOS AND BELIZE BANK PLC OR ONE OR MORE OF ITS AFFILIATES

The paper is totally unendorsed by my clients -Any resemblance to individuals (living or deceased) will be purely coincidental.

Lawyers can now go and get another drink.

Any errors are purely mine and mine only.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
I commend the AAPG and SEG for excellent searchable resources. I welcome any comments regarding the contents of the paper, and I am happy to meet offline to discuss and improve this summary. If you need sources for the various images, text and maps then I can provide those offline. Any questions ? – please mention the slide number, I can then quickly call it up.
Page 3: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Beneath our boots The golden nuggets that lay on the surface of the African and Australian desert plains

didn’t do anything – maybe that was their key property !

Simple surface observations led to the initial discovery of our key resources.

Today, I want to examine – briefly –hydrocarbon seepage: macro and micro the way our Oil & Gas industry uses it at the

surface, not aerial not “remote-sensing”

and

some personal conclusions how we can reduce our costs and improve our success rates.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is a personal presentation. It claims no magic solutions, no software exclusives I realized I needed to learn much more about this subject, and I want to share some learnings with you. Black rocks that caught alight round the log fires became an essential resource. Other rocks placed round the fire ‘bled’ new metals as they roasted.
Page 4: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Global resources Ninety-four elements in the periodic table occur in nature.

Their abundance in the Earth's upper continental crust has been studied for the past 120 years.

Beginning with the first estimation by Clarke (1889). Clarke, F.W., 1889. The relative abundance of the chemical elements. Bull. Philos. Soc. Wash. 11, 131–142.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
There are now global occurrence maps for many elements – that’s very helpful for the miners, but not much help to us. We now know a great deal about our planet, but nowhere near enough to satisfy our ever-increasing requirements.
Page 5: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Hydrocarbons During Biblical times hydrocarbon seeps to surface were

observed – natural fires that seemed to burn for ever.

Coal was the first hydrocarbon to be systematically ‘hunted’ for, after the discovery of the black rock that burnt.

So, whether the location was Sumatra or Azerbaijan or Pennsylvania – seeps became the alerting flag to guide the drill bit.

All these seeps are now called macro-seeps.

1919

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is a 1919 map of the Baku peninsula, where massive oil and gas macro-seeps exist. Noah survived his own personal MFS by caulking his Ark with bitumen Surface seeps provided the first “discoveries” – Wildcatters learnt that the best place to find more oil was close to where oil had already been discovered Global shipping was the first to benefit from the availability of petroleum – thereby ensuring the petroleum industry became global. The era of steam commercialized the coal industry into an essential energy source and spawned the Industrial Revolution. Liquid hydrocarbons replaced coal during the early 20th Century as oil became the next essential energy source. W. Churchill became a early supporter of the new fuel.
Page 6: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Macro- & micro-seepage MACRO-seepage is obvious – encouraged

by faults, dykes and bedding – but usually has a strong lateral bias.

Related to a lack or breach of trap Can define a region of interest

Micro-seepage is invisible to the naked eye, but is continuous and usually vertical.

Related to trapping structures Can define to Prospect & Lead status Overcomes physical obstacles such as

“tight” shales and salt Anomalies are usually positive, but also

can be represented by halosFrom www.agisurveys.net

Presenter
Presentation Notes
We are all aware of the basic principles of subsurface migration, caused by density and pressure differentials and controlled by the permeability variations of the hosting rocks. Obviously the migration of petroleum from kitchen to trap is fundamentally DIFFERENT from micro-seepage. But most surface geochem data comes from field observations - there is insufficient support from laboratory duplication/or simulation. Curiously, mining explorers seem to accept surface geochemistry with ease, while petroleum explorers tend to shy away from "unconventional" methods, with statements that boil down to “I will end up with more questions than answers …… “ “I want to see the results of an existing survey in my basin before I make a decision …..” It is a sobering thought that Jean Wehlan considers that 90% of all natural hydrocarbons have already seeped out into the atmosphere.
Page 7: Beneath our boots final 21042016

The growth of the oil/gas industry

157 years since Captain Drake, we have moved on significantly.

G Laubmeyer 1932: granted a U.S. patent application for soil gas detection & analysis. Sokolov 1929-1933: USSR - published soil gas analyses to assist exploration. Many followed these proposals, in particular Gulf Research and Development Company

(GR&DC) in Pittsburgh; and Phillips in Bartlesville, OK, USA. USSR was an early up-taker, and developed the method successfully.

This technology benefited from two critical breakthrough items: a reliable but portable sensitive gas chromatograph, and the birth of GC-MS.

A reliable consistent means of quickly determining your global position.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
1970’s: Perkin Elmer began production of reliable, very sensitive and (relatively) compact GC’s. 2000: GPS became available globally. Surprisingly, acceptance of this concept in the “West” has been very slow …. 2003 – “Geochemical hydrocarbon exploration remains an unconventional approach in the petroleum industry, although it was first studied back in 1929” Liuping Zhang 2015 - “ There are more than 2600 exploration/appraisal wells globally. 80% of all wells drilled on positive geochem anomalies resulted in commercial discoveries. Only 11% of wells drilled blind (no geochem support) were discoveries”. Schumacher 2002. Despite folks like Ludwig Blau of Humble Oil, who wanted surface geochem everywhere, and was prone to ignoring seismic ………
Page 8: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Gulf Research until 19845 techniques were preferred at GR&DC: A shallow probe, 1-1.2m deep, followed by a deeper probe, 3.5m deep, for calibration

collecting a soil gas sample by applying a vacuum. The samples were analysed by GC.

Soil samples from about 1.2m deep were crushed in a ball mill and heated – and the expelled gas analysed by GC.

Clay-sized particles extracted from soil are treated with acid to release adsorbed hydrocarbons, then analysed as per 2).

A fluorescence technique, where organic compounds in soil samples are extracted with hexane, which is then exposed to UV light and the response is measured.

Detection of benzene (& other aromatics) by brine analysis, and comparison with well fluids.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
From this list, only methods 1) and 5) are currently accepted as practical methods. Meanwhile, a complication had been recognized. Some of the compounds were found be the product of microbial activity in the soil – and the results therefore were no longer accepted as originating purely from the trapped hydrocarbons at depth………
Page 9: Beneath our boots final 21042016

SURFACE EXPLORATION METHODSfor microseep detection & analysis

DIRECT INDIRECT

GASES

VOLATILES

GASES + WATER

BRINES / WATER

GASES

MICROBIAL

BRINES / WATERS

RADIOMETRIC

REDOX

N2 CO2 Thermo-CxHy

Carbohydrates, acetates, formates, etc.

Rn

He Th U

Fe, Mn Ni, V Py I

Fe3<Fe2

Bio-CxHy

Thermo-CxHy

Thermo-CxHy

Thermo-CxHy

CO2H2S

H2SClay minerals

Fluorescence

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is not meant to provide an exhaustive list - - - - Direct methods are the PRIMARY method – they analyse for HCs which originate directly from the underlying accumulation. IN-direct methods analyse for the combination of the ‘direct’ HCs, PLUS all the other chemicals that are induced or derived by both organic and inorganic reactions with the existing flux of hydrocarbons. The empirical relationship between the primary and the secondary compounds is hard to prove due to the complexity of the soil environment – But the analytical results remain valid.
Page 10: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESDirect and indirect hydrocarbon measurement- Take a sample of soil, or extract a gas sample from soil, and then analyse for

hydrocarbons, and possibly other compounds.- Influenced by successful learnings/experiences from GR&DC and Phillips

Petroleum.

GMT syringe in operation

Analyse for C1-C6, CO2, N2, H2S, He ….

AGI module during insertion

Analyse for all hydrocarbons between C2 & C20 and other volatile compounds

From www.agisurveys.net

SAMPLING EXAMPLES

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The two methods above: one takes a gas sample by suction out of the soil. The other is left in the ground for a set period, and acts like a petroleum sponge. There are weaknesses in the methods: which are subject to certain caveats -* atmospheric pollution * anthropogenic pollution * botanical or other biological pollution, irrelevant to the underlying trap * preserving consistency: logistical details, e.g. storage protocols, transport timing, laboratory protocols
Page 11: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Fluorescence (UV)

One of GR&DC’s preferred techniques. The UV-Vis Hydrocarbon Analysis detects the alteration

product of the fulvic acid fraction of the soil organic matter, and to a lesser extent, humic acid. Fulvic acid is the low molecular weight component of soil humins.

Voids in their molecular structure permit entry to available organic material. Condensation & additional reactions hold seepage related hydrocarbons, measurably altering available soil organic material, enhanced by higher pH values.

These additional compounds are responsible for the altered UV response (see upper map).

DETECTION METHODOLOGIES

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The maps cover the same area:�the upper map depicts UV hydrocarbon abundance in nanometres, weak/blue ranges to rich/purple. the lower map depicts analysed soil hydrocarbon abundance in ‰, weak/blue ranges to rich/purple. The NW and western central areas are aligned but the NE and SE is less well aligned. The marked discovery wells match the soil hydrocarbon occurrence more closely that the UV map.
Page 12: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESMicrobial anomalies

Any soil sample represents interactions between ground water, surface water, atmosphere, soil gas and bacteria – a very complex infinitely variable mixture.

Soil bacteria will both generate and consume hydrocarbons. These compounds form part of the interpretation.

Bacteria and fungi possess symbiotic relationships – analytical results need to account for the local products of those relationships in the area of interest.

Success rates of about 70% have been claimed for the Phillips/GMT method during the 1980’s.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Soil bacteria are perhaps the most abundant life forms on our planet. Bacteria and fungi consider hydrocarbons as food, and these reactions themselves also change the soil biochemistry. These reactions can continue after sampling and before analysis – causing false readings – but may be arrested by bactericide Frequently, hydrocarbon consumption results in complex REDOX reactions – mentioned again in the next few slides. Carbohydrates, acetates, and formates are amongst the chemical species produced. Some contractors concentrate on the aerobic bacteria found in the shallowest section of the soil profile. Most contractors analyse up to C5 or even C6. Both ethylene and hydrogen are frequently generated by biogenic near-surface activity. These relationships are well known to the appropriate contractors, mainly through wide field experience. Phillips Petroleum developed the microbial process now marketed by GMT. Principal analytical tools are gas chromatography (GC) and mass spectroscopy (MS).
Page 13: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESIodine – a special case ? Iodine is recognized as an element closely associated with

hydrocarbons, but it appears it is not an exclusive relationship. Iodine-rich brines are recognized globally as marine-derived:

Indonesia (Gujangan, E Java); USA; Canada, even Mongolia. The Anadarko Basin has iodine production from oilfield brines,

producing oil from Carboniferous reservoirs. Amoco, Woodward, OK. 300ppm is a lower limit for economic extraction, with highest concs of 1560-700ppm.

In this example, the Iodine abundance peak coincides with a very significant fungus/spore peak.

The current technology was introduced by: GoldenLab (Al Gallagher) now marketed by Graystone Exploration Labs.

Iodine peak

fungus peak

Presenter
Presentation Notes
I am personally fascinated by Iodine, and the more I read about its behavior with Petroleum Systems the more I want to learn. I understand that the bulk of the Iodine produced near Mojokerto is used for medical/sterilizing purposes. I believe that most Iodine is sourced plutonically and why there should be iodine anomalies associated with petroleum I do not yet understand. But I certainly will be keeping an eye open for iodine compounds in my next few surveys to see what I can learn.
Page 14: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESOther mineralogical anomalies (Py, S, Ni/V, Fe/Mn)

Pyrite was recognized as being particularly common in rocks overlying oil fields in Louisiana. (G.D. Harris)

Sulphur, prime component of pyrite, has been recovered in large quantities near oil and gas fields in Louisiana.

Ni & V anomalies have been reported over several oilfields in Iraq.

Fe & Mn anomalies have been noted over some TX oilfields. (Roeming & Donovan, J Geochem Explor. Vol 23 pp139-162)

Fe may also be elevated by seeping petroleum. This results in increased magnetic susceptibility and micro-gravity.

VNi

V/N

i ra

tio

HALO

Petroleum micro-seepage

Page 15: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESREDOX reactions stimulated by hydrocarbons &

Clay mineral alteration (Eh/pH)

Bacterial activity oxidises HCs and encourages REDOX positives above an HC trap.

This also facilitates conversion of feldspars to clays, and then smectite to kaolinite.

Soil pH is controlled by CaCO3 content, enhanced values (greater than 7) may indicate HC microseepage.

Elevated pH frequently creates a halo around the area of strongest HC microseepage. Conductivity is also enhanced by increasing inorganic/organic salts. A reducing

environment increases the solubility of both U and Th. The reduction co-efficient is often sufficiently high to bleach red beds with widespread

reduction spots, becoming grey-green in colour, (Fe 3 > Fe2). “intense” CaCO3 cement + red bed bleaching reported by F. Reeves in SW Oklahoma

(1922).

Propane ppm

Microseepage fromunderlying petroleum

reservoir

Red bed bleaching

red Fe3 > Fe2 green

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Turkey Creek is a ‘test bed’ site for surface geochem, as it has many of these indirect anomalies, plus radiometrics associated with the Uranium mining nearby !!
Page 16: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Carbon Alteration Index & ΔCO3

CAI is a measure of the buffering capacity of the soil to neutralise acids.

CAI is not pH, but instead refers to the ability of a soils interstitial water to resist change in pH.

These buffering materials are primarily bicarbonates (HCO3-),

carbonates (CO32-) and occasionally hydroxides (OH-).

Borates, silicates, phosphates, ammonium, sulfides, and organic ligands can also act as complementary buffers.

Carbonates can assist in the precipitation (and therefore capture in the soil) of iron, calcium together with lead, arsenic, and cadmium.

Siderite (FeCO3) & calcite (CaCO3) are early diagenetic indicators of petroleum and are often referred to as the delta C carbonate.

The use of CAI as a hydrocarbon exploration tool relies on the accumulation of bacterial end-products in pore fluid.

DETECTION METHODOLOGIES

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This is specially for Philip Bassant …… The delicately shaded map shows the CAI range from 0.2 to 3.2 ppm with blue being the lowest numbers. A successful oil well is located (black dot) near the lowest data, and surrounded by highs. CAI and ΔCO3 (delta C carbonate) are closely linked to the REDOX group of technologies.
Page 17: Beneath our boots final 21042016

DETECTION METHODOLOGIESRadiometrics The Curies extracted their Uranium from nucleide-rich pitchblende (bitumen) from Eastern Europe. Black shales (condensed horizons) are frequently source rocks for petroleum and Uranides.Lundberg in 1956 claimed success using U abundance techniques, with a preferred altitude of not more than 150m above sea level, BUT wait for 3 days after rain. More recent work confirms that U is not a reliable HC detector. However, U has a clear affinity for large organic molecules.He, an inert and highly diffusive gas, has been used morewidely as a HC “detector”. Evidence from WA (Gingin gas field) suggests anomalies greater than the regional background (5ppm) may be associated with HC’s. Rn is recognized as a ‘pathfinder” for petroleum by Armstrong & Heemstra 1973. The Radon along with γ rays, are decay products of Bismuth214.

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Isotopic determinations require a relatively rich sample. Soil samples in the 400-500g range (favouring clay-rich lithologies) provide best results.
Page 18: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Magnetic Susceptibility

Magnetic susceptibility is a measure of the ease with which particular sediments are magnetised when subjected to a magnetic field.

The ease of magnetization is ultimately related to the Fe+Mnconcentration in minerals such as magnetite, hematite, iron titanium oxides, pyrrhotite, maghemite, greigite and goethite. The last one can be distinguished by its pages.

A loop carrying a magnetic field magnetises the susceptible minerals within the sediment. Samples rich in magnetizable substances yield high readings.

Magnetic particles are deposited as products from magnetotactic bacteria in near surface sediments.

DETECTION METHODOLOGIES

Presenter
Presentation Notes
The two examples show magnetic susceptibility over some Ordovician limestone reservoirs in eastern Tennessee. High susceptibility iron-rich minerals may become concentrated in zones where magnetotactic bacteria are active. The methodology is simple, fast, non-destructive and cost effective. The effectiveness needs to be assessed on each particular location prior to committing such a survey.
Page 19: Beneath our boots final 21042016

OFFSHORE

Offshore core sampling

Offshore slick sampling

Preferred Work Flow:

satellite seeps, Ground-truth with slick sampling, followed by multibeam, targetted core sampling including background/negatives, acquiring the widest possible spectrum of hydrocarbons possible, andintegrating these results into your existing seismic interpretation.

SCUBA sampling

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Seabed geochemistry is becoming an essential tool, especially in deep water. If surface slicks are visible, although they rank as macro-seeps they should be sampled. I am really not qualified to speak about offshore operations yet – I think there is a large body of experience documented by the folks in Black Gold and Niko. Whatever analytical procedure is planned, storage in liquid nitrogen is recommended during transit.
Page 20: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Modern Hydrocarbon Exploration No one single tool can provide the answers to the complex questions we ask

The most effective methodology has to be intelligent combination of selected tools to provide answers – NOT SIMPLY MORE QUESTIONS

Surface geochemistry is an integral part of a thorough exploration program.

Look for new technologies – but check them out first…….

Possible Candidate ? : Vacuum desorption of light hydrocarbons adsorbed on soil particles: A new method in geochemical exploration for petroleum : Liuping Zhang 2003

Possible Candidate ? : make the specialist laboratories mobile – but maintain all quality standards

Presenter
Presentation Notes
Surface geochemistry is an integral part of a thorough exploration program. Firstly – understand your Petroleum System/s Then – ask the right questions ! Identify the right tools Be very clear with your stated objectives. Use remote sensing prior to any ground-based activities
Page 21: Beneath our boots final 21042016

MY PREFERRED WORK FLOWS

OFFSHORE ONSHORE

Satellite slick detection

Collect slick samples for analysis

Multi-beam acquisition in hi-graded area

Analyse the recovered cores for the widest spectrum of compounds possible.

Design & execute a widely spaced direct hydrocarbon sampling program to recon the entire AoI.

Repeat sampling at close spacing to cover all Leads from recon survey, for the widest spectrum of compounds possible.

core selected features AND specific background areas

Fly FTG over the entire AoI

Interpret all results: design next step

Interpret & integrate all results. Can you justify a seismic program ?

Interpret & integrate all results. Can you justify a seismic program ?

Presenter
Presentation Notes
This work-flow assumes reconnaissance type survey without the benefit of existing seismic. Do your homework – research existing data, OFFSHORE – I would check with Dan Orange for the latest technologies and practical applications. The ONnshore work is best performed in two cycles, whereas the OFF shore work flow attempts to minimize costs. I would run FTIR on every sample obtained whether offshore or onshore – especially in a wildcat situation – it is incredible value, fast and easy.
Page 22: Beneath our boots final 21042016

My preferences No one single tool can provide the answers to the complex questions we ask

I would prefer to acquire the widest amount of volatile compound data possible, and I want to keep a close watch for Iodine concentrations

I want to sample unpolluted ground around nearby wells to provide me with some wide-ranging calibration data

I want to sample well stream waters for CO2, CH4 and H2O – hoping to get isotopic results

I want to work closely with the potential fields specialists– and also the petroleum system specialists

Get your boots dirty !!

Presenter
Presentation Notes
I want to select procedures and products that are as simple as possible. I want to understand any existing wells – critical post-mortems are critically valuable.
Page 23: Beneath our boots final 21042016

I WANT TO SEE MY RESULTS PRESENTED LIKE THIS:

By the judicious selection of the correct tools applicable to each individual project only then will the correct interpretation come about.

Surface geochemistry is another powerful tool in your toolbox. On its own it is interesting, but not the sole solution to the challenge. Combined intelligently with other tools it WILL improve your exploration success rate.

GOOD LUCK !!

OILFAMILY 1

BACK-GROUND

GASFAMILY

1

OILFAMILY 2

Petroleum Probability

EXISTING PRODUCER

EXISTING OWC

NEXT LOCATION 1NEXT LOCATION 2

Presenter
Presentation Notes
My personal opinion is that Surface Geochemistry is another powerful tool in your toolbox. On its own it is interesting – and stimulates detailed discussions about the nature of petroleum systems – but not the sole solution to the challenge. But then there are few if any tools that provide any “sole solutions”. Combined intelligently with other tools I have no doubts that it WILL improve your exploration success rate. I expect great technical leaps forward will take place especially in this new paradigm of low oil prices.
Page 24: Beneath our boots final 21042016

OILFAMILY 1

BACK-GROUND

GASFAMILY 1

OILFAMILY 2

Page 25: Beneath our boots final 21042016

CONTRACTORS

4 PAGES

Page 26: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Surface Geochem contractors 1ChemTerra International• direct hydrocarbon methods

Chinatech• argon ratios and direct hydrocarbon methods

DMT Technologies, LLC.• high resolution Magnetotellurics for direct hydrocarbon detection

Environmental Biotechnologies, Inc.• microbial surveys for petroleum exploration

Exploration Technologies Inc.• direct detection methods for oil and gas exploration

Geochemical Solutions Internationalgeochemical surveys and spec surveys for oil and gas exploration

Page 27: Beneath our boots final 21042016

GeochemTech Inc.• geochemical surveys with Goresorber method

GeoFrontiers• providing surface hydrocarbon surveys

GeoMicrobial Technologies, Inc.• providing surface microbial and hydrocarbon surveys

US Geochemical• hydrocarbons, microbial, magnetic susceptibility, spectral reflectance, EM surveys• surface exploration consulting and data analysis since 1995.

GrayStone Exploration Labs• quality Iodine analysis for hydrocarbon exploration since 1982.

J.P. Land Associates, Inc• micromagnetic and magnetic susceptibility surveys and interpretation for petroleum exploration

Surface Geochem contractors 2

Page 28: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Meers Microseep Surveys• magnetics and radiometric surveys

MicroPro Gmbh• providing microbial surveys for 30 years in Middle and Eastern Europe

Microseeps Environmental Services• providing geochemical sampling, analytical, and geophysical services since 1984.

Pangea Inc.• providing offshore geochemical sampling and geophysical services since 1994.

Petro-Find Geochem Ltd• soil gas detection

Pinemont Technologies Inc.• Electro Tellurics

Surface Geochem contractors 3

Page 29: Beneath our boots final 21042016

Southeastern E & P Services• direct hydrocarbon detection

Taxon Biosciences Inc.• bacterial DNA analysis for hydrocarbon exploration

TDI-Brooks International• off-shore hydrocarbon sampling and heat flow studies

US Radar• ground penetrating rada systems and software

Vista Geosciences• specializing in soil gas

Advanced Geochemical Imaging Inc. [AGI]• geochemical surveys with Goresorber method

Surface Geochem contractors 4


Recommended