19
Building a better future serving the world Benefits of Spunbond Substrate Uniformity in Advanced Filtration Media Cerex Advanced Fabrics, Inc.
Building a better future serving the world
Benefits of Spunbond Substrate Uniformity in Advanced Filtration Media
Cerex Advanced Fabrics, Inc.
Building a better future serving the world
Introduction
Market demands for finer particle capture, increased dirt holding capacity and longer service lives in today’s smaller, high pressure filtration systems are driving advancements in filter media designs.
Advanced media designs often use multiple layer combinations of cellulose, micro-glass, synthetic fibers and/or membranes to achieve these increased performance requirements.
Many of these more advanced medias are relatively fragile and require structural support to prevent potential damage during processing and while in use.
Spunbond nonwoven fabrics can provide the needed structural support and may actually increase the performance of the filter media during real-life dynamic flow conditions.
Building a better future serving the world
Spunbond Use in Advanced Filter Media
Typically, the spunbond fabrics are placed on one or both sides of the filter media to provide downstream and upstream support.
Some filter medias like synthetic melt blown, nano-fiber and cast membranes are produced directly onto the spunbond fabric and can be classified as “formational.”
Other types of media, like wet laid cellulose and micro glass are produced separately from the spunbond and then co-pleated or bonded to the spunbond in a separate process. These can be classified as “laminated.”
Building a better future serving the world
Impact of Uniformity
The industry recognizes that the uniformity of the filter mediadoes matter and directly impacts the performance of the filter.
A variety of static test methods are used to quantify and verify the media consistency and performance, including among others: The Bubble Point test (ASTM 316, ARP-901A), The Multi-pass test (ISO 16889), TSI 8130 (fka the DOP test), and The Diesel/Petrol Filter Test (ISO 19438)
But this raises a question………
Does the uniformity of the spunbond substrateused in the filter media also matter?
Building a better future serving the world
Does Spunbond Uniformity Matter?
With formational medias, the answer is unquestionably yes. Meltblown and nano-fiber formation are dependent on the substrate fiber
“web” uniformity.
Cast membrane performance is known to be dependent on the consistency of the substrate thickness.
With lamination medias, the answer is more difficult to quantify, especially using traditional “static” filter test methods. The spunbond substrate is to open a structure to act as a filter media, and
traditional filter tests do not typically detect a benefit from the spunbond.
But what happens during actual use conditions when pressures,flow rates and contaminant levels are fluctuating versus static?
Building a better future serving the world
How to Quantify Spunbond Uniformity
Before we can evaluate the potential performance benefits of a more uniform spunbond substrate, we first must agree on methods to quantify uniformity. Visual comparisons have been traditionally used, but are not quantifiable or
reproducable.
One option is to measure the consistency of substrate physical properties
Another option is to utilize digital camera technology and measure the consistency of light transmission through the spunbond.
Basis Weight Thickness Air Permeability
Building a better future serving the world
Most people agree that the visual uniformity of Cerex® brand spunbond nylon is better than polyester
Unfortunately, visual assessments don’t provide quantitative data for comparison
Visual Comparisons are Subjective
Polyester Nylon 6,6 Polyester Nylon 6,6
20 GSM 34 GSM
Sample size is 17 cm by 15 cm
Building a better future serving the world
Physical Property ComparisonsSampling Methodology
• Six (6) 64-72” wide commercially available PET spunbond rolls
• Five (5) 60” wide Cerex® spunbond nylon rolls
• Basis Weights ranged between 20 and 51 gsm
• 10 Full Width MD Samples taken every 10 meters
• 5 to 7 CD Samples taken every 30 cm across the spunbond width
A total of 50 to 70 samples tested per roll for statistical validity
Basis Weight Thickness Air Perm
D3776 D1777 D737
And were tested using ASTM Standardized Methods
Building a better future serving the world
1.30
1.63
1.32
1.62
1.82
1.39
2.31
2.71
2.87
1.80
2.51
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2.0
2.2
2.4
2.6
2.8
3.0
20 25 29 34 36 46 46 51
Bas
is W
eigh
t St
and
ard
Dev
iati
on
(gs
m)
Basis Weight (gsm)
Standard Deviation of Basis Weight Measurements for Nylon and Polyester Spunbond Fabrics
Basis Wt Std dev (gsm) 4 dpf Nylon
Basis Wt Std dev (gsm) 4 dpf PET
Basis Wt Std dev (gsm) 2 dpf Polyester
Basis Weight Variability
More uniform basis weight leads to more uniform strength properties
Building a better future serving the world
Thickness Variability
0.42
0.330.39 0.36
0.45
0.64
0.91
1.181.15
0.54
0.66
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
1.1
1.2
1.3
20 25 29 34 36 46 46 51
Basis Weight (gsm)
Thickness Std dev (mils) 4 dpf Nylon
Thickness Std dev (mils) 4 dpf Polyester
Thickness Std dev (mils) 2 dpf Polyester
Thic
knes
s St
and
ard
Dev
iati
on
(m
ils)
Standard Deviation of Thickness Measurements for Nylon and Polyester Spunbond Fabrics
Thinner composite structures allow:• More surface area (more pleats) or• Lower pressure drop (more space for fluid to flow)
Building a better future serving the world
187
8881
42 40
255
194
159
122
99
62
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
20 25 29 34 36 46 46 51
Basis weight (gsm)
Air Perm Std dev 4 dpf Nylon
Air Perm Std dev 4 dpf Polyester
Air Perm Std dev 2 dpf Polyester
Air Permeability VariabilityStandard Deviation of Air Permeability Measurements for Nylon and Polyester Spunbonds
Air
Per
mea
bili
ty S
tan
dar
d D
evia
tio
n
(ft3
/min
/ft2 )
More consistent air permeability is a good indicator of a more consistent web formation
Building a better future serving the world
Comparing Uniformity using Digital Camera Technology
On-line camera system provides grey scale output of transmitted light which shows thick and thin spots on fabrics
Building a better future serving the world
2
15
43
133
193
125
36
48
35
71
107
130
91
45
35
19
61
0
50
100
150
200
145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200 205 210
Fre
qu
en
cy
Transmitted light Intensity
Histogram of transmitted light intensity for 20 gsm spunbond fabrics
Optical Representation of Fabrics
NylonStd Dev: 5.8
PolyesterStd Dev: 9.5
These outliers are “thin
spots”
Building a better future serving the world
3
16
55
101
9397
91
38
107
19
4549
65
8184
70
62
27
117
2 3
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190
Fre
qu
en
cy
Intensity
Histogram of transmitted light intensity for 34 gsm spunbond fabrics
Optical Representation of Fabrics
Transmitted light intensity data corroborates the physical property data
NylonStd Dev: 8.4
PolyesterStd Dev: 12.1
Note “Thin Spots”
Building a better future serving the world
Case Study – Nanofiber ApplicationSame Process Conditions
TSI 8130 @32 lpm (0.3 μ particle)
% Penetration34 gsm Cerex®
46 gsm Polyester
Average 8.4% 6.3%
Std Dev 1.2% 2.4%
Max % Pen (@ 3 Std Dev)
12.0% 13.5%
Nanofiber E –Spin on substrates at the same equipment settings (Line Speed, Voltage, etc)• Cerex® basis weight was 25% less than the PET spunbond • TSI % Penetration variability range was twice as large for PET (14.4%) as the Cerex® (7.2%)
Building a better future serving the world
Case Study - Hydraulic Dynamic Flow TestingCerex® Nylon Spunbond @ 20 gsm & 34 gsm
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
1 2 3 4 5
Filt
rati
on
Rat
io
Time Interval
6 Micron Filtration Ratio
20 gsm Static
34 gsm Static
20 gsm Dynamic
34 gsm Dynamic
• ISO 16889 (Static) vs ISO 23369 (Dynamic)• Flat Sheet Composite Testing
• Epoxy coated wire both sides• Cerex substrate both sides• 6 micron microglass media
• Test Conditions• 200 sqcm test area
• 6 lpm - Static• 2.5 to 10 lpm – Dynamic
• Mil Std 5606 Oil with ISO Medium Test Dust• 125 Psid Terminal Pressure
• Clean Delta P Static Dynamic• 20 gsm 1.1 psi 1.7 psi• 34 gsm 1.2 psi 1.8 psi
Flat Sheet testing showed some positive directional data, but failed prior to test completion.
Next Step is to test filter cartridges to eliminate “blow by” failures.
Building a better future serving the world
Conclusions
Visually the CEREX spunbond appears more uniform
Key physical properties were approximately twice as consistent
Digital Camera analysis showed spunbond nylon was 30 – 50% less variable
Electrospun nanofiber media performance showed lower penetration variability even at a 25% lower spunbond basis weight.
The CEREX® spunbond nylon had measurably greater uniformity than commercially available spunbond polyester.
Dynamic flow testing on flat sheet lamination type media showed favorable directional information, but failed prior to test completion
Additional testing using filter canisters is being conducted to determine if spunbond uniformity impacts “in-use” dynamic flow conditions.
Building a better future serving the world
Excellent Uniformity
Exceptional Strength
Thermal Stability
Thinner Caliper
Chemical Affinity
The Nylon Advantage® Matters!
Building a better future serving the world
Please visit us at booth C18 (Hall 11) or contact us for additional information
www.cerex.com
Thank You
The Nylon Advantage®
