Date post: | 02-Mar-2018 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | wrong-guess |
View: | 214 times |
Download: | 0 times |
of 18
7/26/2019 Benjamin Siounit v Palos Verdes Estates Police Department Complaint 01-28-2013
1/18
Id t1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
1 i
Q 2
U
i
'')
then handed Plaintiffan eleven-page document,
printed
from
the
Department's briefing room
printer,
which
detailed
more ridiculous and incredibly
anti-Semitic
propaganda, and
suggested
that Plaintiff should
learn
more about his religion.
21. Inor around December
of
2011, Plaintiffwasapproached in the parking
garage
of
the
station
by
a
fellow
officer
and asked, in front
of
supervising
officers, if
he
knew
why Jews
and
Arabs keep fighting
each other
like cats and dogs.
No supervising officers
intervened.
22. Inaddition to the confrontations above, throughout his time with the Department,
Plaintiffhas been scheduled and forced to work on Jewish holydays, despite repeated and prior
requests
to not be scheduled on
such days.
When Plaintiffmade these requests,
he
was told that
he
had
nochoice, and that adverse employment actionswould be takenagainst him if hedidn't
work the
days
as
scheduled.
Based
upon
information
and
belief,
the
Department
made
no
effort
to schedule around the holy days observed by Plaintiff.
23. Plaintiff also had particulardifficulty meeting his requiredfirearm range
qualifications, because
range managers,
including two
in
particular,
refused to
schedule Plaintiff
ondays that did
not
conflict with his
observed religious holidays
and
worship, despite
Plaintiffs
repeated
requests. Based upon information and belief, they did
this
with the
intent
to make it
difficult for Plaintiff to make his firearm qualifications.
24.
During
a
meeting
onor
about February
6,
2012, with
Sergeants
Eric
Gaunt
and
Lou
Warnick, Plaintiffagainmadea formal complaint about theanti-Semitic and racist
treatment
from fellow and superior officers.
When this
issue was brought up, Sergeant Gaunt replied let's
notgo there, making it clearthat
neither
henor the Department
had
any
concern
about the
treatment received by Plaintiff, and did not intend to do anything about it.
25. During thatsame meeting, Plaintiff
informed
his superiors ofothermisconduct
and unlawful behavior by fellowofficers that he had witnessed. Plaintiff was told that the
purpose
of themeeting was not to talkaboutthose
issues.
Immediately thereafter. Plaintiff
was
asked to leave for a few minutes as the others wanted to speak amongst themselves. He was also
asked if he had been tape recording the meeting, which he did not.
26 .
When Plain ti f fwas
asked back in to the room , he
was
to ld that h e
was
no t
COMPLAINT
5
7/26/2019 Benjamin Siounit v Palos Verdes Estates Police Department Complaint 01-28-2013
6/18
6S
10
11
12
id 15
4.
a
O
c
is
O
*-
4
c E
O s
z o
JO
Q .
e
U i
c
o
o
7/26/2019 Benjamin Siounit v Palos Verdes Estates Police Department Complaint 01-28-2013
17/18
SHORT
TITLE.
Siounit v. City of Palos Verdes Estates
CASE
NUMBER
>
on
o
a
E
o
O
c
o
E
UJ o
i2
o
a>
a
10
h
o
o
o
in
5=
.>
2
o
r...i
Y>
f> ;
A
Civil Case
Cover
Sheet
Category No.
B
Type of Action
(Check only one)
c
Applicable Reasons -
Se e
Step
3 Above
Asset
Forfeiture (05)
D
A6108 Asset Forfeiture Case
2. ,
6.
Petition re Arbitration (11)
O A6115 Pet it ion to Compel/ConfirmA/acate Arbit ration
2.,
5.
Writ of
Mandate
(02) '
A6151 Writ -
Administrative
Mandamus
A6152 Writ -
Mandamus on Limited
Court
Case
Matter
Q A6153
Writ-Other
Limited Court
Case
Review
2 , 8 .
2.
2.
Other
Judicial
Review
(39)
D A6150 Other Writ/Judicial Review
2. . 8.
Antitrust/Trade Regulation (03)
O A6003 Antitrust/TradeRegulation
1 2 8
Construction Defect (10)
D A6007 Cons t ruc ti on Defec t
1 .2 . , 3.
Claims Involving
Mass
Tort
(40)
D A6006 Claims InvolvingMass Tort
1 2.. 8.
Securities Litigation (28)
Q A6035 Securit ies LitigationCase
1., 2 , 8.
Toxic To rt
Environmental (30)
O
A6036
Toxic Tort/Environmental
1.. 2., 3., 8.
Insurance
Coverage
Claims
from
Complex Case
(41)
D A6014 Insurance Coverage/Subrogation (complex case only)
1., 2 ,
5. ,8.
Enforcemen t
of
Judgment
(20)
Q A6141
Sister State Judgment
a A6160 Abstract of Judgment
D A6107 Con fes siono f Judgment (non-domestic relations)
O A6140 AdministrativeAgency Award (not unpaid taxes)
O A6114 Petition/Certificate for Entry of Judgment on Unpaid Tax
D A6112 Other Enforcement of Judgment
Case
2 , 9 .
26.
29 .
2 . 8 .
2 . 8 .
2 . 8 , 9 .
RICO (27)
O A6033 Racketeer ing (RICO)
Case
1 .. 2 ., 8.
Other Complaints
(Not Specified Above) (42)
D A6030 Declaratory Relief Only
D A6040 Injunctive Relief Only (not domestic/harassment)
Q A6011 Other Commercial Complaint
Case
(non-tort/non-complex)
D A6000 Other CivilComplaint (non-tort/non-complex)
1..2..8.'
2,8 .
1 , 2 , 8 .
1 , 2 . 8 .
Partnership
Corporation
Governance
(21)
D A6113
Partnership and Corporate Governance Case
2 ,8
Other Peti t ions
(Nol Specified Above)
(43)
O A6121 Civil
Harassment
D A6123 Workplace Harassment
D A6124 Elder /Dependent Adul tAbuse
Case
D A6190 Election
Contes t
O A6110 Petition for Changeof Name
D A6170
Petition
for
Relief from
Late
Claim Law
O
A 61 00 O th er
Civil
Petition
2. . 3., 9.
2 , 3 . 9 .
2. . 3., 9.
2.
2
7.
2., 3 ., 4 , 8.
2 , 9 .
LASIV 109 (Rev. 03/11)
LASS Approved
03-04
CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET
ADDENDUM
AND STATEMENT
OF LOCATION
Local Ru le 2 .0
Page 3 of 4
7/26/2019 Benjamin Siounit v Palos Verdes Estates Police Department Complaint 01-28-2013
18/18
SHORT
TITLE:
Siounit v. City of
Palos Verdes Estates
CASE NUMBER
Item
III. Statement
ofLocation:
Enter
theaddress oftheaccident, party's residence or
place
ofbusiness,
performance,
or
other
circumstance
indicated
in Item II.,
Step 3 onPage
1,
as theproper reason
for
filing
in
the
court
location
you
selected.
REASON:
Check the appropriate
boxes
for
the numbers shown
under Column C for
the
type of action
that
you have
selected
for
th is c a s e .
1.
D2. 03 .
D4. D 5.
D 6. D 7.
D8.
Q9.
D10.
OTY:
Palos Verdes
STATE;
CA
ZIP
CODE:
90274
AOORESS:
City of
Palos Verdes
Estates
34 0
Palos
Verdes Dr West
Item
IV. Declaration
ofAssignment.
I
declare under penalty
ofperjury
under
the laws oftheStateofCalifornia thatthe foregoing is
true
and correct and
that the
above-entitled matter is
properly filed
for
assignment to
the
Stanley Mosk courthouse in
the
District of theSuperiorCourtof
California,
County of Los
Angeles
[Code
Civ.
Proa, 392 et seq., and Local
ent ra l
Rule 2.0, subds. (b), (c)
and
(d)J.
Dated: 01/28/2013
(SIGNATURE OF ATTORNY/FILIN