Date post: | 16-Dec-2015 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | magdalena-ovitt |
View: | 217 times |
Download: | 3 times |
Bent Crystal Results to Bent Crystal Results to DateDate
Feb 26, 2007Feb 26, 2007
D. StillD. Still
Relative Positions of Crystal and Relative Positions of Crystal and E03HE03H
Relative position between Crystal and E03H
0
50
100
150
200
250
12-Feb 14-Feb 16-Feb 18-Feb 20-Feb 22-Feb 24-Feb 26-Feb
Date of studies
Po
siti
on
rea
din
gs
(mil
s)
cccp
e03h
Thought from DiscussionsThought from Discussions
Is there an effect on baking the strip Is there an effect on baking the strip crystal.crystal.
Should we request addition crystals Should we request addition crystals for possible use here. Maybe for possible use here. Maybe 150urad and ~400 urad.150urad and ~400 urad.
Total Work on SatTotal Work on Sat Finished Finished
scansscans
Scanned -28 Scanned -28 mils point.mils point.
Data w/ TEL Data w/ TEL offoff
Data w/ 1mm Data w/ 1mm bumpbump
Effect of TEL offEffect of TEL off
TEL off drops TEL off drops losses by X2.losses by X2.
Not sure if Not sure if this is a this is a problem.problem.
Results of scan from 20 to 46 Results of scan from 20 to 46 milsmils
LE0PIN Vs E0CCIW Feb 24 data E0CCIw from 20 to 46 mils
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
20 25 30 35 40 45
E0CCIW (mils)
LE
0PIN
(h
z)
t:le0pin 11 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le0pin)
Results of a 3urad scan from a Results of a 3urad scan from a 36x36 end of store study 9-30-36x36 end of store study 9-30-
20052005Crystal Collimator Angular Scan 3urad step
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
5000
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Crystal Angle (urad)
Lo
ss (
hz)
t:le033c
t:e1l14c
Channel SignatureChannel Signature
Possible channel CCIW = -28.2 milsFeb 19,2007 data 2urad steps, Colls out, E03H in
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400
relative angle (urads)
Lo
sses
(h
z)
t:le033c c:lostpc t:le0pin
20 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le033c) 20 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le0pin) 20 per. Mov. Avg. (c:lostpc)
154292138 urad
channel
Rescan of possible channel (-Rescan of possible channel (-28mils)28mils)
LE0PIN vs E0CCIWFeb 24 data rescan of possible channel at E0CCIW = -28 to -27
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
-47 -42 -37 -32 -27 -22 -17 -12 -7
t:e0cciw 10 per. Mov. Avg. (t:e0cciw)
Could not Confirm Could not Confirm ChannelingChanneling
Rescan to confirm channel at CCIW = -28.2 milsfrom data on Feb 19,2007
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
-30 -29 -28 -27 -26 -25 -24 -23 -22 -21
E0CCIW inchworm (mils)
LE
0PIN
BL
M
(hz)
t:le0pin 10 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le0pin)
Should have seen channeling but only saw large losses.
Maybe due to beam motion, angle does Not repeat?
Beam on Feb 20 different than Previous store. Crystal and E03HDid not go in as far.
Previous EOS
FEB 20 EOS
Summary of the Crystal Summary of the Crystal Studies:Studies:
Completed a 2 urad step size scan over the Completed a 2 urad step size scan over the entire range of the ~ 8000 urad of the entire range of the ~ 8000 urad of the inchworm. In part of that data on Feb 19 inchworm. In part of that data on Feb 19 saw a signature of channeling. saw a signature of channeling. Rescanned the area that was believed to Rescanned the area that was believed to be channeling (E0CCIW ` -28 mils) multiple be channeling (E0CCIW ` -28 mils) multiple times including different rates, inch worm times including different rates, inch worm approaches and a +1 mm vertical offset to approaches and a +1 mm vertical offset to the crystal. We could not reproduce any the crystal. We could not reproduce any other signature of channeling.other signature of channeling.
Summary continuedSummary continued Did make a scan with TEL 2 off and noticed that it Did make a scan with TEL 2 off and noticed that it
reduced the amount of loss noise on the crystal reduced the amount of loss noise on the crystal by about a factor of 2. This should not effect by about a factor of 2. This should not effect channeling. Also TEL was used during “O” channeling. Also TEL was used during “O” shaped measurements without problem only shaped measurements without problem only addition of noise.addition of noise.
Todd informed that the optical offset measured Todd informed that the optical offset measured before installation was 0 = 3.9 volts on the LVDT before installation was 0 = 3.9 volts on the LVDT which is about 2000 urad offset. There should still which is about 2000 urad offset. There should still be a enough inchworm angle to see channeling.be a enough inchworm angle to see channeling.
Attempts to make a horizontal angle bump would Attempts to make a horizontal angle bump would only lead to a small angle and we are not sure only lead to a small angle and we are not sure that alignment is the total problem.that alignment is the total problem.
This leaves making the bend angle and alignment This leaves making the bend angle and alignment measurements in the tunnel as the next best measurements in the tunnel as the next best ideas.ideas.
The Plan this Week:The Plan this Week:
Finish scanning the 8 mrad angular range of inchworm.Finish scanning the 8 mrad angular range of inchworm.
Investigate anything that looked like channeling.Investigate anything that looked like channeling.
8 mrad Angular Inchworm range
This is the signature we are looking for
Scanned last weekScanned this week
Looking for the channelLooking for the channelPossible channel CCIW = -28.2 mils
Feb 19, 2007 data 2 urad steps, Colls out, E03H in
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500 5000
relative angle (urads)
Lo
sses
(h
z)
t:le033c c:lostpc t:le0pin
20 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le033c) 20 per. Mov. Avg. (t:le0pin) 20 per. Mov. Avg. (c:lostpc)