Bergen International Diving Seminar 2019TUP with SPHL CONCEPT
David ChampionDiving Manager
TYPICAL TUP SYSTEM
INDUSTRY GUIDANCE and STANDARDS
• Who Involved /Regulates
• Health and Safety Executive, PFEER, SCR
• Petroleum Safety Authority
• IMO, SOLAS
• IMCA D 052 & D 053 provides guidance
on equipment specifications
• OGP Report 478 describes
Hyperbaric evacuationplanning requirements
• DNV GL RP E403 provides SPHL Technical Specifications
ALL REFERENCE TO SATURATION DIVING OPERATIONS ONLY
HOWEVER –April 2017 – UK HSE Diving Inspectorate
Advice on the Emergency Evacuation of Divers, including Divers Involved in TUP Diving Operations
DSV Based TUP Diving
The introduction of TUP systems, and their use in deeper and longer duration dives means that there is the potential for divers to require longer duration decompression requirements.
The use of accelerated emergency decompression may not be appropriateas the primary means of evacuation due to the increased risk of decompression illness, and
the use of an SPHL may be considered to be more appropriate.
This decision will be based on a suitable and sufficient risk assessment. It is best to hold detailed discussions with HSE in relation to specific diving projects and systems.
INDUSTRY GUIDANCE and STANDARDS
TYPICAL TUP SYSTEM WITH SPHL
MINI SAT SYSTEM ?
• Single Door• Sealed using internal pressure• Unable to decompress Divers to surface• Requires Hyperbaric Evacuation Plan and Reception Facility
DSV ADAPTABILITY
TUP DIVING – NEW CONCEPT – WHY?
SubseaPartner Solution
• Diving Bell Access via Side Door• Access /Egress to DDC via SPHL cockpit• SOLAS Compliant• DNV Certified• Life Support Applicable to Diving Method
Member of Team A experiences DCS after Surfacing and Team B has past No Decom Dive Profileand an Abandonment is required
Team B immediately recovered to SPHL and transferred to EL and decompression Initiated. Team A blown down in Transfer Lock, Transferred to SPHLML with DMT and Therapeutic Initiated SPHL deployed
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
DEP
TH f
sw
TIME 0 -08hrs 30MINS
TUP 70(21msw)/180 SCHEDULE Example Dive Profile
TEAM A
TEAM B
ABANDONMENT - WHAT IF SCENARIO’S
Detached / Trapped Diving Bell requiring Stand-By Diver Intervention and external factor requiring vessel abandonment
Stand-By Diver recovered with Dive Team BTeam A (DMT) Blowdown in Transfer LockDeploy SPHLAll 7x Divers decompressed in ML & EL
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
DEP
TH f
sw
TIME 0 -08hrs 30MINS
TUP 70(21msw)/180 SCHEDULE Example Dive Profile
TEAM A
TEAM B
ABANDONMENT - WHAT IF SCENARIO’S
TUP DIVING – NEW CONCEPT - WHERE & WHEN
TUP DIVING – NEW CONCEPT - WHERE & WHEN
TUP DIVING v SURFACE DIVING COMPARISON
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
12
:00
:00
AM
12
:30
:00
AM
01
:00
:00
AM
01
:30
:00
AM
01
:55
:00
AM
02
:25
:00
AM
02
:55
:00
AM
03
:25
:00
AM
03
:55
:00
AM
04
:25
:00
AM
04
:55
:00
AM
05
:25
:00
AM
05
:55
:00
AM
06
:25
:00
AM
06
:55
:00
AM
07
:25
:00
AM
07
:55
:00
AM
08
:25
:00
AM
08
:55
:00
AM
09
:25
:00
AM
09
:55
:00
AM
10
:25
:00
AM
10
:55
:00
AM
11
:25
:00
AM
11
:55
:00
AM
12
:25
:00
PM
12
:55
:00
PM
01
:25
:00
PM
01
:55
:00
PM
02
:25
:00
PM
02
:55
:00
PM
03
:25
:00
PM
03
:55
:00
PM
04
:25
:00
PM
04
:55
:00
PM
05
:25
:00
PM
05
:55
:00
PM
06
:25
:00
PM
06
:55
:00
PM
07
:25
:00
PM
07
:55
:00
PM
08
:25
:00
PM
08
:55
:00
PM
09
:25
:00
PM
09
:55
:00
PM
10
:25
:00
PM
10
:55
:00
PM
11
:25
:00
PM
11
:55
:00
PM
DEP
TH M
SW
TME
24 Hour Tidal Diving
TUP
SlackWater
In-WaterDecom
TUP Diving 30msw/ 110mins =440 mins Bottom Time ( Shallow Saturation)
In-Water Decom 30msw /50mins schedule = 200 mins Bottom Time
TYPICAL MANPOWERREQUIREMENTS
Position Saturation Diving Conventional Surface Diving
TUP Diving
Offshore Manager 1 1 1
Dive Supervisors 4 4 4
Saturation Divers 15 (3 in decom) 0 0
Divers 2 10 14
Life Support Personnel 6 0 0
Dive Technicians 2 2 2
TOTAL 28 17 18
£ £31,981.59 £ 10,282.94 £ 12,861.72
TUP DIVING – NEW CONCEPT – COST ANALYSIS
OR in Water Productive Times Cost Per MinuteSat Diving = £72.68Surface Diving = £ 51.41TUP Diving = £ 29.23
• TUP Diving is an Accepted method of Diver Intervention.• Need to consider Hyperbaric Evacuation due to longer decompression times compared to conventional surface
Diving Techniques, IE- SUR D02 and In-Water. • TUP Diving with Hyperbaric Evacuation offers significant cost savings (estimate 50% dependent on project
requirements) in comparison to shallow Saturation Diving in the range up to 40msw – 50msw.• At present there is no industry guidance for TUP Hyperbaric Evacuation.• In an abandonment situation it is safer to Decompress Divers in the SPHL and on reaching ambient pressure the
SPHL is considered a Lifeboat• TUP Hyperbaric Evacuation does not require any Hyperbaric Reception Facility.• Not practical to adapt existing DSV,s for TUP Diving – unable to Decompress Divers.
SUBSEAPARTNER SOLUTION TO OFFER THE FIRST
• DNV certified, Lightweight System with a Bespoke DDC installed in a SOLAS compliant SPHL.• Capable of Mobilising within 24 hours.• Potential to re-commence Diving Operations from Installations.• Available for 2020 Season or earlier if required.• Have already developed TUP Decompression Tables and Procedures.
QUESTIONS?
CONCLUSIONS