+ All Categories
Home > Business > Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

Date post: 12-Nov-2014
Category:
Upload: bpost
View: 1,449 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
DM is ook een efficiënte tool om een sterk merk te creëren. Een uitgebreid overzicht van de efficiëntie van direct mail, beginnende bij nieuwe betacijfers i.m.v. de herinneringsgraad.
38
1
Transcript
Page 1: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

1

Page 2: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

2

Brand X % awareness attributed to DM

Page 3: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

3

“if it is accepted that all behavior in an

interactional situation has message value,

i. e., is communication, it follows that no

matter how one may try,

one cannot not

communicate."

Page 4: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

4

Page 5: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

5

Page 6: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

6

Page 7: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

7

Branding=

The marketing practice of creating a name, symbol or

design that identifies and differentiates a product from

other products (www.entrepreneur.com)

A seller’s promise to deliver a specific set of features,

benefits and services consistent to the buyers (Ph. Kotler ?)

Page 8: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

8

Page 9: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

9

6,2%

Own DB = 8,9% External DB = 5,4%

Page 10: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

10

23% turnover + 248 % 12%

Page 11: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

11

Source: Royal Mail / Brand Science

Page 12: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

12

Beware: traditional media also

emphasize their short term sales

response

Page 13: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

13

Plurimedia

Short term effect if 50K more investment

n: 300 brands measured during 80 periods

Page 14: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

14

Short term effect if 50K more investment

n: 300 brands measured during 80 periods

Page 15: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

15

Page 16: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

16

Page 17: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

17

Source: Mediapost (F)

Page 18: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

18

+25% +37% +9% +44% +62%Source: Royal Mail / Brand Science

Page 19: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

19

DM EFFECTIVENESS DM EFFECTIVENESS INTERACTS INTERACTS WITH OTHER CHANNELSWITH OTHER CHANNELS

Page 20: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

20

6% response

… means 94% waste ???

Page 21: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

21

Source: Mediapost (F)

Page 22: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

22

“Overall, which advertising media do you like the most ?”

31%

23%

13%

7%

5%

4%

3%

Addressed DM

Unaddressed DM

TV

Press

Email

Internet

Radio

Source : Market Probe 2010

In het algemeen, via welk medium ontvangt u het liefst reclame?De manière générale, sur quel média préférez-vous la publicité ?

Page 23: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

23

47%

33%

12%

9%

11%

8%

2%

Digital ImmigrantsDigital Natives Late Adopters

Addressed DM

Unaddressed DM

TV

Press

E-mail

Social Networks

Radio

45%

21%

25%

20%

11%

12%

9%

41%

24%

16%

18%

12%

10%

4%

Source : Market Probe

“I like receiving advertising through this medium”

Page 24: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

24

Source: Synovate Censydiam 2007

Page 25: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

25

DM as a medium, the story of the

« Beta » coefficient

Page 26: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

26

Developped in the 70’s

by A. Morgensztern

Beta = probability

of recalling a given ad

after 1 contact,

generally reconstructed,

based on post-tests

Beta coefficient

Recall after 1 contact

determines recall

after « n » contacts

« Beta » may be used

as a model parameter

for recall building

and decay

Page 27: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

27

Page 28: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

28

Recall DM - spontAided Recall DM:

product category

Aided Recall DM: DM

description

Opening (Y/N)?

Recall content (describe)

Yes

No

Evaluation (score on 7 points scale)

Liking, convincing, inciting, relevant for me, original,

interesting, informative, give a positive image of the

brand, increases knowledge on brand

Aided Recall DM: Brand

prompted

Action taken

(will go to the shop, call, use coupon,…)

Intention to buy

(score 5 points scale)

Reading type:

open not read, partially, normally, completely

Use DM after reading

- thrown away, kept, given to someone else

- Information discussed or seen by others: Y/N

Action after reception

Thrown away, kept for reading later, given to

someone else

Demographics:

Age, social class, language

Brand awareness

category (spont.)

Page 29: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

29

Recall DM

- spont

Aided

Recall DM:

product

category

Aided

Recall DM:

DM

description

Aided

Recall DM:

Brand

prompted

Brand

awareness

category

(spont.)

Yes

No

Base for

beta coefficient

calculation

Similar approach than for other media

Page 30: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

30

Average beta

coefficient

DM

Based on recall

as given by the

post campaign

measurements *

Frequency

considered

equal to 1 *

No decay factored

since

the first exposure *

Averaged across

target groups

Page 31: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

31

Average DM

beta value = 67,4%

out of 89 cases

After one DMcampaign

2 out of 3exposed individuals

are likely torecall the advertised

brand

Page 32: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

32

Avg=

67,4%

Campaign recall % per category

Page 33: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

33

Campaign recall % per type database

Avg=

67,4%

Page 34: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

34

Page 35: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

35

The story The story goesgoes onon……

Page 36: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

36

As a conclusion…

Page 37: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

o Everyone now cares about [sales] response…

o No channel/medium owns a monopoly in branding power

o « Mail medium » maybe better as name than« direct mail »

o Mail medium = 2nd best in recall building

o Our rules should fit those of the consumer: « siloing » is about techniques.

37

Page 38: Bernard cools - DM, the good, the bad or the ugly for branding?

38

Thank you !


Recommended