+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart...

Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart...

Date post: 22-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: lequynh
View: 216 times
Download: 4 times
Share this document with a friend
56
1 1 Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review © Fraser Health Authority, 2011 The Fraser Health Authority (“FH”) authorizes the use, reproduction and/or modification of this publication for purposes other than commercial redistribution. In consideration for this authorization, the user agrees that any unmodified reproduction of this publication shall retain all copyright and proprietary notices. If the user modifies the content of this publication, all FH copyright notices shall be removed, however FH shall be acknowledged as the author of the source publication. Reproduction or storage of this publication in any form by any means for the purpose of commercial redistribution is strictly prohibited. This publication is intended to provide general information only, and should not be relied on as providing specific healthcare, legal or other professional advice. The Fraser Health Authority, and every person involved in the creation of this publication, disclaims any warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness or currency, and disclaims all liability in respect of any actions, including the results of any actions, taken or not taken in reliance on the information contained herein.
Transcript
Page 1: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

11

Best Practices in Retrospective ChartReview

© Fraser Health Authority, 2011

The Fraser Health Authority (“FH”) authorizes the use, reproduction and/or modification of this publication for purposes other than commercial redistribution. In consideration for this authorization, the user agrees that any unmodified reproduction of this publication shall retain all copyright and proprietary notices. If the user modifies the content of this publication, all FH copyright notices shall be removed, however FH shall be acknowledged as the author of the source publication.

Reproduction or storage of this publication in any form by any means for the purpose of commercial redistribution is strictly prohibited.

This publication is intended to provide general information only, and should not be relied on as providing specific healthcare, legal or other professional advice. The Fraser Health Authority, and every person involved in the creation of this publication, disclaims any warranty, express or implied, as to its accuracy, completeness or currency, and disclaims all liability in respect of any actions, including the results of any actions, taken or not taken in reliance on the information contained herein.

Page 2: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

22

http://http://research.fraserhealth.caresearch.fraserhealth.ca//

Page 3: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

33

ObjectivesObjectives

1.1. Learn chart review concepts and Learn chart review concepts and applications of chart review in health applications of chart review in health researchresearch

2.2. Learn best practices in designing and Learn best practices in designing and conducting a retrospective chart reviewconducting a retrospective chart review

Page 4: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

44

Workshop OutlineWorkshop Outline

9:00 9:00 –– 9:30 9:30 Chart Review Concepts Chart Review Concepts

9:30 9:30 –– 10:30 10:30 Designing and Conducting Designing and Conducting Chart ReviewsChart Reviews

10:30 10:30 –– 10:45 10:45 BreakBreak

10:45 10:45 –– 12:00 12:00 Designing and Conducting Designing and Conducting Chart Reviews Chart Reviews

Page 5: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

55

Page 6: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

66

Chart ReviewChart ReviewUtilizing data/information that was Utilizing data/information that was originally collected for a different originally collected for a different original purposes (e.g. administrative, original purposes (e.g. administrative, recordrecord--keeping)keeping)

““secondary datasecondary data””

Applications in:Applications in:ResearchResearchEvaluationEvaluationQuality improvement / Practice auditsQuality improvement / Practice audits

Page 7: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

77

Chart Review ConceptsChart Review Concepts

Page 8: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

88

EE XX 1:1:

RR EE SS EE AA RR CC HH

Page 9: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

99

EE XX 2:2:

EE VV AA LL UU AA TT II OO NN

Page 10: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1010

Research MethodResearch Method

Chart reviewChart review

Survey / questionnairesSurvey / questionnaires

Prospective data collectionProspective data collectionClinical dataClinical data

Use of databasesUse of databases

Page 11: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1111

Experimental studies

Randomised controlled trial

Non-randomised controlled trial

YesNo

Random allocation

Observational studies

Analytical studyDescriptive study

YesNo

Comparison group

Exposure↓

Outcome

Exposure↑

Outcome

Cohort study

Case-control study

Ecologicalstudy

Case series

Cross-sectionalstudy

1 or few

Group level information

Individual level information

Many

Research Method vs. Study DesignResearch Method vs. Study Design

Page 12: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1212

Why Chart Reviews?Why Chart Reviews?

Ethical considerationsEthical considerationsMinimal risk Minimal risk ddelegated reviewelegated reviewNo consent requiredNo consent required

Cost (at FHA Health Records)Cost (at FHA Health Records)Funded studies: $5 per chartFunded studies: $5 per chartUnfunded studies: Unfunded studies: ““Ask nicely/begAsk nicely/beg””

Research study feasibilityResearch study feasibilityReadily available dataReadily available dataAvoid lag time in waiting for health outcomes to occurAvoid lag time in waiting for health outcomes to occurAccess to rare cases or occurrencesAccess to rare cases or occurrences

Page 13: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1313

Limitations of Chart Reviews Limitations of Chart Reviews

Internal ValidityInternal ValiditySelection biasSelection biasResearcher biasResearcher biasConfoundingConfounding

External ValidityExternal ValidityGeneralizabilityGeneralizability of of resultsresults

“We (the journal) are dubious about the integrity of

retrospective chart review studies and therefore cannot accept your manuscript for

publication.”

Authors report in a retrospective way about perfusion reactions on

infliximab The retrospective nature of this

work has its flaws.

Methodology does not outline how the retrospective chart review was standardized. Is having a single rheumatologist evaluating the charts and, more particularly, the

relation of the adverse event to the infliximab infusion sufficient? This is suboptimal methodology.

Page 14: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1414

Limitations of Chart Reviews Limitations of Chart Reviews

Internal ValidityInternal ValiditySelection biasSelection biasResearcher biasResearcher biasConfoundingConfounding

External ValidityExternal ValidityGeneralizabilityGeneralizability of of resultsresults

Designing your research

Collecting appropriate data, appropriate analysis

Discussion section (of manuscript)

Page 15: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1515

Chart Reviews in Health ResearchChart Reviews in Health Research

Medline Search , February 23, 2011Medline Search , February 23, 2011

Page 16: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1616

Chart Reviews in Health ResearchChart Reviews in Health Research

Efficacy and costEfficacy and cost--effectiveness of a blood salvage effectiveness of a blood salvage system in primary total knee system in primary total knee arthroplastyarthroplasty----aa retrospective retrospective matchmatch--controlled chart reviewcontrolled chart review..

Factors determining the persistence or recurrence of Factors determining the persistence or recurrence of wellwell--differentiated thyroid cancer treated by differentiated thyroid cancer treated by thyroidectomythyroidectomy and/or radioiodine in the Boston and/or radioiodine in the Boston Massachusetts are: Massachusetts are: a retrospective chart reviewa retrospective chart review

Nurse practitioner management of chronic Nurse practitioner management of chronic musculoskeletal pain: musculoskeletal pain: a chart reviewa chart review

Page 17: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1717

……Designing and Designing and Conducting Doing a Chart Conducting Doing a Chart

ReviewReview

Page 18: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1818

Are you ready for a plate of spaghetti?

Page 19: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

1919

Framework(sFramework(s) for Chart Reviews) for Chart Reviews99--Step ProcessStep Process

1. Conception1. Conception2. Literature review2. Literature review3. Proposal development3. Proposal development4. Data abstraction 4. Data abstraction instrument organizationinstrument organization5. Abstraction protocols and 5. Abstraction protocols and guidelinesguidelines6. Data abstraction6. Data abstraction7. Sample size justification7. Sample size justification8. Ethics8. Ethics9. Pilot study9. Pilot study

FH FrameworkFH Framework1. Generate idea1. Generate idea2. Conduct literature review2. Conduct literature review3. Refine research question3. Refine research question4. Plan research methodology4. Plan research methodology

5. Create research protocol5. Create research protocol

6. Apply for funding6. Apply for funding7. Apply for ethics 7. Apply for ethics 8. Collect and analyze data8. Collect and analyze data9. Draw conclusions9. Draw conclusions

Gearing. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;15(3):126-134.

Page 20: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2020

Excellent ResourceExcellent Resource……

Page 21: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2121

1. Generate Research Idea1. Generate Research Idea

Clinical observation, curiosityClinical observation, curiosityOperationalizeOperationalize into research questioninto research question

PICO MethodPICO Method• Translate clinical problem (or population/public

health problem) into a structured question and identify the key concepts

• ElementsPatient: Who are you studying?Intervention: What intervention are you studying?Comparison: What will the intervention be compared to?Outcome: What outcome(s) are you interested in?

Page 22: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2222

Group Discussion 1Group Discussion 1

What are your research questions that What are your research questions that may be addressed using chart reviews?may be addressed using chart reviews?

Page 23: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2323

1. Generate Research Idea1. Generate Research Idea

Consider feasibility issuesConsider feasibility issuesAvailability of dataAvailability of data•• Is the information you are seeking available from Is the information you are seeking available from

the medical record and is the chart information the medical record and is the chart information likely to be useful in answering your question?likely to be useful in answering your question?

•• This step is often overlooked or not thoroughly This step is often overlooked or not thoroughly undertaken.undertaken.

Consult with peers and expertsConsult with peers and expertsPreliminary review (1Preliminary review (1--3 charts)3 charts)

Page 24: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2424

2. Conduct Literature Review2. Conduct Literature Review

Identify available evidenceIdentify available evidenceHow is the patient How is the patient populationpopulation defined?defined?What What interventionsinterventions have been studied?have been studied?What have been used as What have been used as comparatorscomparators??What are reported What are reported outcomeoutcome measures?measures?What methodologies have been used?What methodologies have been used?

Takes time butTakes time but……Very important step in the research process.Very important step in the research process.You have resources and supportYou have resources and support

•• DERS DERS –– formulating research questionformulating research question•• FH librarians FH librarians –– executing literature searchexecuting literature search

Page 25: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2525

3. Refine Research Question3. Refine Research Question

Confirmed through literature search and review

Page 26: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2626

Page 27: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2727

4. Plan Research Methodology4. Plan Research Methodology

A.A. Study sample Study sample How many? How? How many? How? B.B. Data abstraction instrument organizationData abstraction instrument organizationC.C. Abstraction protocols and guidelinesAbstraction protocols and guidelinesD.D. Data abstractionData abstractionE.E. Dataset considerationsDataset considerationsF.F. AnalysisAnalysis

Page 28: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2828

4A. Study Sample4A. Study Sample

How many charts will How many charts will you to look at?you to look at?Descriptive studyDescriptive study

Consider Consider •• Sampling methodsSampling methods•• ““Bounds of your studyBounds of your study””

Analytic studyAnalytic studyConsiderConsider

•• Statistical test, outcomeStatistical test, outcome

Consult with your friendly Consult with your friendly DERS epidemiologistDERS epidemiologist

How will you sample How will you sample the charts?the charts?3 commonly used 3 commonly used sampling methodssampling methods

ConvenienceConvenienceQuotaQuotaSystematicSystematic

Page 29: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

2929

4A. Study Sample4A. Study Sample

Convenience samplingConvenience samplingCharts selected over specific time frameCharts selected over specific time frameIf rare disease, all pertaining chartsIf rare disease, all pertaining charts

Quota samplingQuota samplingPredetermined number of charts from each Predetermined number of charts from each site, diagnostic determinantsite, diagnostic determinant

Systematic samplingSystematic samplingEvery nEvery nthth chart (by date of diagnosis, by chart (by date of diagnosis, by ordered patient list)ordered patient list)

Page 30: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3030

4B. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines4B. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines

What charts will you reviewOutpatient charts, hospital charts

Who will review charts/abstract dataWho will review charts/abstract dataResearch assistant/coordinatorResearch assistant/coordinatorStudy investigatorsStudy investigators*Do they need clinical background?**Do they need clinical background?*

Page 31: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3131

4B. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines4B. Abstraction Protocols & GuidelinesWhat information will you collect?

List data (should have identified when preparing your protocol)Where to find in the chart

How will data be collected / stored?How will data be collected / stored?Data Abstraction ToolData Abstraction Tool

•• Paper?Paper?•• Electronic?Electronic?

Page 32: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3232

4B. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines4B. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines

Goal is to be able to address:Goal is to be able to address:How will methods be standardized?How will methods be standardized?

Page 33: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3333

Data Abstraction Tool (DAT)Data Abstraction Tool (DAT)

Best practicesBest practicesHave list of data that you want to collectHave list of data that you want to collectDevelop DAT along with protocol Develop DAT along with protocol Keep DAT items and instructions clear and conciseKeep DAT items and instructions clear and conciseDesign DAT to follow the data flow from the Design DAT to follow the data flow from the perspective of the person completing it, taking into perspective of the person completing it, taking into account the flow and organization of data in the chartaccount the flow and organization of data in the chart

•• Keep chart handy while developing DATKeep chart handy while developing DAT

Design DAT with the primary measures of interest in Design DAT with the primary measures of interest in mind as the main goal of data collection. mind as the main goal of data collection. Design DAT with accompanying data collection Design DAT with accompanying data collection instruction book, and data dictionary.instruction book, and data dictionary.

Page 34: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3434

DAT Design ConsiderationsDAT Design Considerations

Know your chartsKnow your chartsDAT should be designed keeping in mind chartDAT should be designed keeping in mind chartKeep chart handyKeep chart handy

DAT featuresDAT featuresFeasibleFeasible

•• Capable of being completedCapable of being completed

AcceptableAcceptable•• Resulting data is usefulResulting data is useful

ReliableReliable•• Information abstracted is consistentInformation abstracted is consistent

Page 35: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3535

Know your Charts!Know your Charts!

Static DataStatic DataSnapshot in timeSnapshot in timeDemographicDemographicMedical historyMedical history

Evolving DataEvolving DataInformation is collected Information is collected over timeover timeRepeated measurementRepeated measurementVital signsVital signsDaily Medication ordersDaily Medication orders

Cumulative DataCumulative DataCollected over time, but Collected over time, but not linked to specific not linked to specific points in timepoints in timeMedication errorsMedication errors

Single record - single page

Series of single records/pages per time interval

Single page cumulative log linked with time interval

Single page cumulative log

Page 36: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3636

DAT: FeasibleDAT: Feasible

Have logical order of items in DATHave logical order of items in DATMatch with order and type of information in the Match with order and type of information in the chartchart

Consider Consider ‘‘modulesmodules’’ to match chart informationto match chart informationLab values, pharmacyLab values, pharmacy

Goal is to facilitate data entry into DAT and minimize Goal is to facilitate data entry into DAT and minimize errorserrors

Page 37: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3737

DAT: Acceptable DAT: Acceptable

PrePre--screen charts for availability of informationscreen charts for availability of information

Have detailed instructions for recording potentially Have detailed instructions for recording potentially ambiguous informationambiguous information

Distinguish between missing information, not Distinguish between missing information, not appropriate information, or not doneappropriate information, or not done

Goal is to minimize and manage of missing Goal is to minimize and manage of missing informationinformation

Page 38: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3838

DAT: AcceptableDAT: Acceptable

Minimize errorMinimize errorLimit manual entry of numbers or textLimit manual entry of numbers or text•• ““ForceForce”” entryentry

Standardize response optionsStandardize response options•• Use boxes/shapes to enter information Use boxes/shapes to enter information •• Be consistentBe consistent•• Choose ONE OF Choose ONE OF

circled itemscircled itemscheckmarkscheckmarksXX

•• Ensure DAT is easy to readEnsure DAT is easy to read•• Ensure sufficient spaceEnsure sufficient space

Page 39: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

3939

What would you use? What would you use?

LDL cholesterol value _____LDL cholesterol value _____

LDL cholesterol value _____mg/LDL cholesterol value _____mg/dLdL

LDL cholesterol value _____mg/LDL cholesterol value _____mg/dLdL or ______or ______mmolmmol/L/L

LDL cholesterol value ______LDL cholesterol value ______ mg/mg/dLdLunit if different ______unit if different ______

Page 40: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4040

Make good use of instructions, cues, and examplesMake good use of instructions, cues, and examples

TextTextSite of injury (e.g. left shoulder)____________Site of injury (e.g. left shoulder)____________

NumericNumericAge [___] yrsAge [___] yrs

DateDate__ /____ / ____ /____ / __dddd mmmmmm yyyy (e.g. 02/may/05)(e.g. 02/may/05)

Standardizing DAT ResponsesStandardizing DAT Responses

Page 41: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4141

For categorical variables specify whether it is single For categorical variables specify whether it is single response, multiple response or coded responseresponse, multiple response or coded response

Single response Single response (Check (Check onlyonly one)one)OOYesYes OONoNo

MultipleMultiple--response response (May (May circlecircle more than one)more than one)Diabetes Arthritis Cancer HypertensionDiabetes Arthritis Cancer Hypertension

Coded ResponseCoded Response (Enter corresponding number)(Enter corresponding number)11OOMild Mild 22OOModerate Moderate 33OOSevere Severe [__][__]

Standardizing DAT ResponsesStandardizing DAT Responses

Page 42: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4242

DAT: ReliableDAT: ReliableTestTest--retest reliabilityretest reliability

Assess consistency within the same personAssess consistency within the same person•• To assess drift over timeTo assess drift over time•• To assess errors during learning phaseTo assess errors during learning phase

InterInter--raterrater reliabilityreliabilityDo any two data abstractors record the same Do any two data abstractors record the same information?information?•• Test data abstractors against each otherTest data abstractors against each other•• Test data abstractors against gold standard Test data abstractors against gold standard

exampleexample

Page 43: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4343

DAT Pilot Testing DAT Pilot Testing ForFor DesignDesign

Consider looking at a few chartsConsider looking at a few chartsSee what is documentedSee what is documented•• Will tell you what you can captureWill tell you what you can capture

Get an idea of what the hurdles are?Get an idea of what the hurdles are?•• E.g. details of when antibiotic reached the ward E.g. details of when antibiotic reached the ward

were not availablewere not available

Find out where the information actually isFind out where the information actually is•• i.ei.e what section of the chartwhat section of the chart•• This helps in planning time to complete the workThis helps in planning time to complete the work

Page 44: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4444

DAT Pilot Testing DAT Pilot Testing ForFor ValidityValidity

Once DAT is designed and Codebook is in place Once DAT is designed and Codebook is in place –– test test out the data abstraction and coding process on a few out the data abstraction and coding process on a few charts:charts:

Are key pieces of information missing?Are key pieces of information missing?Does the information translate easily from chart to DAT?Does the information translate easily from chart to DAT?Are there classifications, codes or other information that need Are there classifications, codes or other information that need refining?refining?

A formal pilot study to test the feasibility, reliability and A formal pilot study to test the feasibility, reliability and validity of the data abstraction process is recommended.validity of the data abstraction process is recommended.

Sample size of up to 10 percent of the intended sampleSample size of up to 10 percent of the intended sample

Page 45: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4545

Group ExerciseGroup Exercise

Critique the DATCritique the DAT

Page 46: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4646

Paper vs. Electronic Paper vs. Electronic DATsDATs

Consider pros and cons of each approachConsider pros and cons of each approach

Page 47: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4747

4C. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines4C. Abstraction Protocols & Guidelines

Reference manualReference manualClear instructions for how to collect the Clear instructions for how to collect the required informationrequired informationListing of each variable, location in Listing of each variable, location in chart, method for transcribing from chart, method for transcribing from chart to DATchart to DAT

Page 48: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4848

4D. Data Abstraction4D. Data Abstraction

Page 49: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

4949

4E. Dataset Considerations4E. Dataset Considerations

Page 50: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5050

4F. Analysis4F. Analysis

Page 51: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5151

More Spaghetti?More Spaghetti?

Page 52: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5252

Framework(sFramework(s) for Chart Reviews) for Chart Reviews99--Step ProcessStep Process

1. Conception1. Conception2. Literature review2. Literature review3. Proposal development3. Proposal development4. Data abstraction 4. Data abstraction instrument organizationinstrument organization5. Abstraction protocols and 5. Abstraction protocols and guidelinesguidelines6. Data abstraction6. Data abstraction7. Sample size justification7. Sample size justification8. Ethics8. Ethics9. Pilot study9. Pilot study

FH FrameworkFH Framework1. Generate idea1. Generate idea2. Conduct literature review2. Conduct literature review3. Refine research question3. Refine research question4. Plan research methodology4. Plan research methodology

5. Create research protocol5. Create research protocol

6. Apply for funding6. Apply for funding7. Apply for ethics 7. Apply for ethics 8. Collect and analyze data8. Collect and analyze data9. Draw conclusions9. Draw conclusions

Gearing. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;15(3):126-134.

Page 53: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5353

7. Apply for Ethics Approval7. Apply for Ethics Approval

Need to complete Department Agreement Need to complete Department Agreement for Providing Researchfor Providing Research--Related Services Related Services (DAR) form(DAR) form

Health records Health records eepartmenteepartmentLink to DAR form:Link to DAR form:http://research.fraserhealth.ca/approvals_%26_ethichttp://research.fraserhealth.ca/approvals_%26_ethic

s/formss/forms--andand--guidanceguidance--notes/notes/

Page 54: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5454

8. Collect and Analyze Data8. Collect and Analyze Data

Page 55: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5555

9. Draw Conclusions & Relate Findings9. Draw Conclusions & Relate Findings

Page 56: Best Practices in Retrospective Chart Review - Fraser · PDF file19 Framework(s) for Chart Reviews 9-Step Process 1. Conception 2. Literature review 3. Proposal development 4. Data

5656

Happy Charting


Recommended