+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in...

Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in...

Date post: 14-Dec-2015
Category:
Upload: aubrey-chambers
View: 216 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Popular Tags:
19
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III non- inferiority trial Koeberle D, Betticher D, von Moos R, Dietrich D, Brauchli P, Baertschi D, Matter K, Winterhalder R, Borner M, Anchisi S, Moosmann P, Kollar A, Saletti P, Roth A, Frueh M, Kueng M, Popescu R, Schacher S, Hess V, Herrmann R Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Reseach
Transcript
Page 1: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line

chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer:

a randomized phase III non-inferiority trial

Koeberle D, Betticher D, von Moos R, Dietrich D, Brauchli P, Baertschi D, Matter K, Winterhalder R, Borner M, Anchisi S, Moosmann P, Kollar A, Saletti P, Roth A, Frueh M, Kueng M, Popescu R, Schacher S, Hess V, Herrmann R

Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Reseach

Page 2: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Background

• Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab (BEV) is a standard option for first-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer

• In many countries duration of first line chemotherapy in the absence of disease progression or severe toxicity is usually limited to 4-6 months

• After stopping first-line chemotherapy plus BEV the value of BEV monotherapy as maintenance strategy until disease progression is unknown

Page 3: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Study design

First-line chemo-therapy + BEVfor 4-6 months

No PDNo PD

Randomization1: 1

BEV continuation(7.5 mg/kg q 3 w)

until PD

No antitumor treatment(no BEV) until PDStratification factors:

• Best response during first-line chemotherapy + BEV (CR/PR vs SD)• Duration of first-line chemotherapy + BEV (16-20 vs 21-24 weeks)• Type of chemotherapy (Irinotecan + 5-FU vs Oxalipaltin + 5-FU vs Fluoropyrimidine mono)• Disease burden (metastases in one organ vs multiple organs)• Center

Study conducted in 26 sites in Switzerland (accrual period 2007-2012)

Page 4: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Main eligibility criteria

• Patients ≥ 18 years with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of colorectal adenocarcinoma

• First-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease with oral or intravenous fluoropyrimidine alone, or in combination with irinotecan or oxaliplatin

• Chemotherapy must have been given in combination with standard dose of BEV for at least 16, but no longer than 24 weeks as part of the first-line treatment

• Last administration of BEV within 4 weeks before randomization

• Stable disease (SD), partial response (PR) or complete response (CR) after end of chemotherapy/BEV first-line treatment (tumor assessment within 21 days before randomization)

Page 5: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Endpoints

Primary endpoint:

• Time to progression (TTP)– Measured by CT-scans q 6 weeks from randomization until PD

Secondary endpoints:

• Progression free survival (PFS)• Time to second-line treatment • Overall survival (OS) • Adverse events related to BEV • Treatment costs

Page 6: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Statistical considerations• Non-inferiority study

– Assumption: TTP of ≤ 22 weeks for BEV continuation TTP of ≥16 weeks for no BEV

– Hypothesis: BEV vs. no BEV Hazard Ratio (HR) HR ≥ 16/22 = 0.727

• 219 events required for a significance level of 10%, a power of 85% to detect a HR=1, one interim analysis

• Analysis based on 262 evaluable patients (131 in each arm)

Page 7: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Patient characteristicsCharacteristic (% patients) BEV (n=131) No BEV (n=131)

Age (range) 63 (40-83) 65 (23-85)

Sex: male / female 72 / 28 73 / 27

WHO performance status: 0 / 1 74 / 26 69 / 31

Adjuvant Chemotherapy 28 28

Clinically significant comorbidities 58 50

Response first-line: CR+PR / SD 62 / 38 59 / 41

First-line duration: 16-20 / 21-24 weeks 64 / 36 69 / 31

First-line chemotherapy: Irinotecan + fluoropyrimidine Oxaliplatin + fluoropyrimidine Fluoropyrimidine mono

3162 7

3263 5

Page 8: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

RESULTS

Based on a median follow-up time of 30.1 months(Range in living patients 2.7 - 54.9)

Page 9: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

TTP (from randomization)

/

/ / / /

/ /

/ / / / / /

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time (months)

Pro

port

ion

with

out

prog

ress

ion

BEV

no BEV

No. at riskBEV 131 40 14 8 6 5 3 2 1no BEV 131 22 10 7 5 1 1 1 0

BEV no BEV

No. of events 124 123

Median(95%CI)

4.1 months(3.1-5.4)

2.9 months(2.8-3.8)

HR 95% CI

0.74 (0.57-0.95)

Non-inferiority p = 0.47

Page 10: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

TTP subgroup analysis

0.5 0.727 1.0 1.5

BEV better no BEV better

all

age < 60

age > 60

female

male

WHO 0

WHO 1

FL CR/PR

FL SD

FL dur 16-20

FL dur 21-24

FL iri + fluo

FL oxa + fluo

FL fluo mono

1 organ

>1 organs

Hazard Ratio (95% CI)

FL = First-line

Page 11: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

PFS (from start of first-line therapy)

/

/

/ / / /

/

/ / / / / /

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time (months)

Pro

port

ion

with

out

prog

ress

ion/

deat

h BEV

no BEV

No. at riskBEV 131 122 40 13 6 6 5 3 2 1no BEV 131 116 18 8 7 4 1 1 0 0

BEV no BEV

No. of events 125 124

Median(95%CI)

9.5 months(8.6.-10.2)

8.5 months(8-8.9)

HR 95% CI

0.75 (0.58-0.96)

Difference p = 0.021

Page 12: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Time to second-line treatment (from randomization)

/

/

/

/

/

// //

/ /

// /

/ / / /

/

/

/

/

/// / / / / / / / /

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time (months)

Pro

port

ion

with

out

seco

nd-li

ne t

reat

men

tBEV

no BEV

No. at riskBEV 131 60 23 16 9 7 4 2 1no BEV 131 46 17 11 8 4 3 1 0

BEV no BEV

No. of events 112 112

Median(95%CI)

5.9 months(4.8-7.5)

4.8 months(4.1-5.5)

HR 95% CI

0.81(0.62-1.05)

Difference p = 0.104

Page 13: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Overall Survival (from start of first-line therapy)

/ /

///

/

////

//

/////

//

/ /////

//

/// / // /

/ //

// /

/ /

///

//

//

///

/ /

/////

////

/ //

// ////

//// / /

/ /

/ / /

0 6 12 18 24 30 36 42 48 54 60

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Time (months)

Pro

port

ion

surv

ivin

g

BEV

no BEV

No. at riskBEV 131 130 115 86 52 33 22 10 3 1 0no BEV 131 131 107 76 44 25 13 6 1 1 1

BEV no BEV

No. of events 84 84

Median(95%CI)

25.1 months(22-28.9)

22.8 months (20.3-26.1)

HR 95% CI

0.83(0.61-1.12)

Difference p = 0.218

Page 14: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Adverse events

BEVN=131

No BEVN=131

CTCAE grade

Patients (%) 1-2 3-4 5 1-2 3-4 5

Hemorrhage 5 - - 1 - -

Hypertension 15 6 - 3 1 -

Proteinuria 15 - - 1 - -

Thrombosis - 2 - - - -

GI-Perforation - - - - - -

Page 15: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Cost analysis

Included resource use Base case 1) Low (-30%) High (+30%)

BEV continuation USD 5.58/mg

BEV administration USD 372

Control visit to oncologist USD 165 115 215

In-patients USD 1600/day 1120/day 2080/day

CT-scan USD 663

MRI USD 735

1) Swiss prices and Swiss health system

Not included costs: Laboratory tests, out-patient AE treatments, other out-patient treatments/care

Page 16: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Cost analysis

BEV NO BEV

Page 17: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Cost analysis

To

tal c

ost

s U

SD

Page 18: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Summary

• Non-inferiority could not be demonstrated

• The difference in median TTP between BEV continuation versus no treatment after randomization is 5 weeks

• Overall survival in both arms is not significantly different

• Utility of BEV continuation needs to be balanced

with significantly higher treatment costs

Page 19: Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.

Acknowledgements

• Patients

• Investigators, study coordinators and nurses at SAKK coordination center and study sites

Swiss Association of Social Health Insurance Companies

Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research


Recommended