+ All Categories
Home > Documents > Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Date post: 01-Dec-2014
Category:
Upload: deepak-raj-chaudhary
View: 426 times
Download: 3 times
Share this document with a friend
11
Unión Carbide and Bhopal: Dairy of a Disaster
Transcript
Page 1: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Unión Carbide and Bhopal: Dairy of a Disaster

Page 2: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Introduction

• In 1969 UCC (Union Carbide Corporation) choose Bhopal as manufacturing site for new pesticide plant

• Agreed to transfer the technology• New plant operated by subsidiary UCIL• Site on northern city limits• Railway and Bus station located at about 1

mile and half mile away respectively

Page 3: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Q1. Where did Union Carbide go wrong?

Pesticide Market in India1. Agricultural market peaked in 1979

2. Economic recession and drought in 1982-83 lead to falling demand

3. Farmers welcomed cheaper alternatives

4. UCIL faced a loss of $4 million in 1984

5. Cost cutting program started

Page 4: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Cont…

Technical Issues:1. World’s largest (alpha-napthol) plant in

Bhopal

2. Blocked pipelines and wrong sized pumps

3. Three, 15000 gallons tanks for buffer stock of MIC (Methyl Isocyanite)

4. Other companies manufacture it when it was needed

Page 5: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Cont….

5. Refrigeration plant to keep MIC tanks at 0-5ºC was shut down

6. Alarms adjusted to sound at 20ºC

7. Filled 2 tanks more than 50-60% of capacity

8. Excessive equipment failure & maintenance problem (UCC audit report)

9. Inadequate safety valves (UCC audit report, 1982)

Page 6: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Cont…

Workforce issues:1. UCC expected to train and staff the

UCIL plant with Indian employees

2. No Americans working by end of 1982

3. Recruitment standard dropped

4. Training shortened

5. High turnover of plant personal, especially in operations

Page 7: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Cont…

6. Maintenance supervisors eliminated from 2nd and 3rd shift

7. Shift staffed trimmed from 12 to 6

8. No proper coordination between shift employees (pressure change from 2 to 10 psi not reported to next shift)

9. Many staffs unfamiliar with emergency procedure, flee in panic

Page 8: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Q2. Was there any way that adequate compensation could

have been paid to close the matter?

1. UCIL handled all operational matters

2. UCC had financial & technical control

3. UCIL developed close ties with local government

4. Many officials worked in senior positions

Page 9: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Cont…

5. UCC didn’t take responsibility

6. Opened up possible charge of sabotage

7. Indian government acted very late

8. Confusion over where should case be tried

9. $150 billion, total values of claim

10.Indian government agreed to interim relief of $5 million

Page 10: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Conclusion

• All finances were controlled by UCC and they didn’t take responsibility of the disaster

• Bhopal plant was managed by UCIL• Indian government unable to decide on

compensation amount• Hence it was not possible to close the

matter without a long court battle

Page 11: Bhopal Gas Tragedy: Case Study

Thank You


Recommended