+ All Categories
Home > Documents > BIBLIOGRAPHY Books - Information and Library...

BIBLIOGRAPHY Books - Information and Library...

Date post: 09-Mar-2018
Category:
Upload: phamthuan
View: 215 times
Download: 2 times
Share this document with a friend
25
i BIBLIOGRAPHY Books Gupta S.P.,Statistical Methods, 30 th Revised Edition, Sultan Chand & Sons Publications New Delhi, 2001. Kothari C.R., Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second Edition, New Age International (P) Ltd., New Delhi. 2000. Krishna Swami O.R, M. Ranganatham; Methodology of Research in Social Sciences, Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi.2006. Journals, Magazines, Reports and Thesis Abhishek Kumar Mahto (2011); “Analyzing the Consumer Preference Towards Various Unit Linked Insurance Plan In India of IDBI FORTIS”, Submitted For the Partial Fulfillments of, Post Graduate Diploma In Mangement 2010-2011, IIMT Professional College, Meerut. Arindam Gupta and Rabindranath De Dalal (2008); “An Inquiry into Structural Adjustment in Indian Life Insurance Sector”; GITAM Journal of Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 55-79, Jan-Mar. Arora, R.S. (1992); “Marketing of Services: A Study of LIC in Jalandhar Division”, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Commerce and Business Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar. Asokan T. (2007); “Re-Entry of Private Insurers in India – A Surveillance”; Department of Management studies, Kannur University- Kerala; SAJOSPS, January – June. Banumathy, S., and M. Subasini (2004); “Attitude of Policyholders towards Life Insurance Business in Virdhunagar”; The Insurance Times, Vol. xxiv, No.7, pp:25-28.
Transcript

i

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Books

Gupta S.P.,Statistical Methods, 30th Revised Edition, Sultan Chand & Sons

Publications New Delhi, 2001.

Kothari C.R., Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second

Edition, New Age International (P) Ltd., New Delhi. 2000.

Krishna Swami O.R, M. Ranganatham; Methodology of Research in Social

Sciences, Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi.2006.

Journals, Magazines, Reports and Thesis

Abhishek Kumar Mahto (2011); “Analyzing the Consumer Preference

Towards Various Unit Linked Insurance Plan In India of IDBI

FORTIS”, Submitted For the Partial Fulfillments of, Post Graduate

Diploma In Mangement 2010-2011, IIMT Professional College,

Meerut.

Arindam Gupta and Rabindranath De Dalal (2008); “An Inquiry into

Structural Adjustment in Indian Life Insurance Sector”; GITAM

Journal of Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 55-79, Jan-Mar.

Arora, R.S. (1992); “Marketing of Services: A Study of LIC in Jalandhar

Division”, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Commerce and Business

Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.

Asokan T. (2007); “Re-Entry of Private Insurers in India – A

Surveillance”; Department of Management studies, Kannur

University- Kerala; SAJOSPS, January – June.

Banumathy, S., and M. Subasini (2004); “Attitude of Policyholders towards

Life Insurance Business in Virdhunagar”; The Insurance Times,

Vol. xxiv, No.7, pp:25-28.

ii

Banumathy, S., and S. Manickam (2004); “Customer Services provided by

Life Insurance Corporation of India – A Case Study”; The

Insurance Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 6, pp: 30-33.

Bhasin, S. (2004); “Ensuring Insurance”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv,

Issue 1, pp: 34-37. Coimbatore Corporation; City Development

Plan; July 2006.

Consumer Voice Report on the Insurance Sector (2006); “Study shows that

Private Insurers more responsive to Consumer Needs”; IRDA

Private Sector, Consumer online Foundation.

Dalal, R.De, and A. Gupta (2004); “Profitability of Contemporary Life

Insurance Schemes – A Comparative study between LICI and Tata-

AIG”; The Management Accountant, vol. 39, No. 11, pp: 926-29.

Dhanda, R.L. (2004); “Divisional Performance Evaluation of LIC Business

in Northern Zone”; Finance India, Vol. xviii, No. 1, pp: 229-33.

Gahelot, B.D. (2000); “Disquisition of Life Insurance Business”; Monthly

Public Opinion Surveys, Vol. xlv, No. 10, pp: 35-39.

Gupta, P.K. (2003); “Branding in Insurance – An Indian Exposition”;The

insurance Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 10, pp: 30-34, 48.

Harris Interactive Inc. (2003); “A Study about Life Insurance Policies”;

Public Relation Research, Insurance Marketplace Standards

Association (IMSA) (www.imsaethics.org).

Hemanth C.R (2010); “A comparative study of ULIP plans of reliance life

insurance with mutual funds”, Submitted at partial fulfillment of

the award of the Degree of Bachelor of Business Administration

(2008-2010) Tecnia Institute of Advanced Studies, Delhi.

Jawaharal, U., and N. Pareek (2004); “Customer Service in Life

Insurance”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv, Issue iv, pp: 17-19.

iii

Joy Chakraborty, Research Associate (2006), “Private Life Insurance

Companies in India: Growing Prospects and Challenges”-, The

ICFAI Business School Research Center, Kolkata.

Jyoti Rana (2008); “Insurance Advertising – A Creative approach to

Provide Security to Life”; Advertising Express, The ICFAI

University Press, May.

Kalra, R.K., and D.K. Garg (1999); “AIDA Model and Rural Marketing

with Special Reference to LIC Policies”; Management Stream,

Vol. 1, No. 1, pp: 56-59.

Kumar, R. (2004); “World Insurance and India”; The Insurance Times,

Vol. xxiv, No. 5, pp: 19-23.

Kumar, R., and K. Vaidya (2004); “Differentiation Strategies of Life

Insurance Companies”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv, Issue 3, pp:

43-49.

Lal, R., and N. Dhanda (2003); “Life Insurance Corporation of India

Devising its Strategies to Meet the challenges of Insurance Sector

Reforms”; National Seminar on Emerging Trends in Financial

Services and International Business, Guru Jambheshwar

University, Hisar.

Malliga, R. (2000); “Marketing of LIC Policies – A Study on Agents

Tirunelveli Division”; Indian Journal of Marketing, Vol. xxx, No.

8-10, pp: 6-9.

Mohanty, A.K, and P.K. Sahu (2004); “Opportunities and Challenges of

Services marketing in the Liberalized Era”; Employment News,

January 3-9, Vol. xxviii, No. 40, New Delhi, pp: 1-2.

iv

Monica C. Singh and SantoshDhar (2007); “Customer’s Perception of

Factors affecting Selection of Life Insurance Products”; NMIMS

journal January-July.

Murlidhar, S. (2001); “A Study of Marketing strategies of Life Insurance

Corporation of India”, Ph.D. Thesis, Bangalore University,

Bangalore.

Muthusamy A. and A. Meera (2008), “Wind of changing life insurance

market in India; market survey”; Fact for you; March.

Parasnis, P. (2001); “Distribution of Life Insurance – An Industry in

Transition”; Monthly Public Opinion Surveys, Vol. xlvi, No. 11,

pp: 27-31.

Pathak, P., and S. Singh (2003); “Increasing Competitiveness through

Marketing – A Case Study of Life Insurance Corporation of

India”; The Alternative, Journal of Management Studies and

Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp: 27-31.

Patil, K.S. (2003); “Life Insurance Corporation of India, Its Products and

their Performance Evaluation: A Special Reference to Gulbarage

District”; Finance India, Vol. xvii, No. 3, pp: 1037- 40.

Phatak and Dhar (2003); “Role of Non-Banking Finance Companies in

Insurance Sector: challenges and Opportunities”; Journal of

Insurance and Risk Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp: 117-128.

Ramamurthy, N. (1992); “Journey towards Complete Customer

Satisfaction”; Yogaksheema, Vol. 36, No. 9, pp: 20-22.

Raman, N., and C. Gayathri (2004); “A Study on Customers Awareness

towards New Insurance Companies”; Indian Journal of Marketing,

Vol. xxxiv, No. 1, pp: 25-27.

v

Ramanathan .K.V (2011); A project on “A study on policy holders

satisfaction with special reference to life insurance corporation of

India, Thanjavur division, Bharathidasan University, 2011

Reagan, B., Brostoff, S., and M.A. Hofmann (2001); “Added Value Key to

Agent/Broker survival”, “Insurers Vow to Keep Agents as Key

Distribution Component”, “Bank/Broker Deals Having Little effect

on Risk Managers”; National Underwriter, Vol. 105, No. 29,

Business Insurance, Vol. 14, pp: 132-152.

Reddy, V.A., and G.N. Murthy (1996); “Customer Services in LIC – A

Case Study”; Indian Journal of Marketing, vol. xxv, No. 4, pp: 18-

22.

Reddy, V.A., and G.N. Murthy (1996); “Privatization of Life Insurance –

An Analysis”; Indian Journal of Commerce, Vol. xlix, No. 188,

Part 3, pp: 62-66.

Sahoo, S.C. (2004); “A Comparative Analysis: LIC’s Komal Jeevan vs.

ICICI’s Smart Kid & Tata-AIG’s Mahalife Junior”; The Insurance

Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 2, pp: 22-27.

Saibaba, R. (2002); “Perception and Attitude of Women towards Life

Insurance Policies”; Indian Journal of Marketing, Vol. xxxii, No.

12, pp: 10-12.

Sandhu H.S and Neetu Bala (2006); “Marketing of Life Insurance Services

Revisited”; Department of Commerce & Business Management,

Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar; Indian Management

Studies Journal 10, pp: 1-33.

Selvavinayagam K .and Mathivanan R. (2010); “A study on policy holders

preference and satisfaction of services rendered by selected life

insurance companies in Tamilnadu, Namakal district”,

vi

International Journal of Marketing and Trade policy, Vol 2, No.1-

2, (Jan- Dec 2010):47-5 6.

Sonal Ginodia (2010); “Consumer Preference of ULIP (Unit Linked

Insurance Policy), Submitted in Partial Fulfillments of the

Requirement for the award of the Degree of Master Of Risk &

Insurance Management,” (2008-2010), Faculty of Commerce

Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.

Sridevi P. (2012); “Study of Buying Behaviour of Consumers Towards Life

Insurance Policies In Perambalur District”, IJRMEC Volume 2,

Issue 5(May 2012) ISSN: 2250-057X

Subhasis Ray (2007); “Segmentation on Investment in Personal Insurance

and Determination of Insurance Needs through Human Life Value

Modeling”; Management & Labour Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1,

February.

Sundar, K., and R.R. Babu (2001); “Marketing of Insurance Services”;

Third Concept, Vol. 15, No. 173, pp: 30-33.

Task Force (1997); “Why Some Americans Do and Don’t Tolerate

Insurance Fraud – A Study on Public Attitudes”; Coalition against

Insurance Frauds, (www.InsuranceFraud.org).

Vineet Kumar (2008 -2010); “Comparative Analysis of ULIP Plans With

Reference To Idbi Fortis And Birla Sunlife”, MBA Dissertation,

IIMT Group of Colleges, IDBI Fortis in association with Federal

Bank, IDBI Fortis Life Insurance Co Ltd.

Web sites

• Cheris, S.C. Chan (2000); “Marketing Insurance A Way of Life:

Cultural Resistance and Global-Local Dynamics in the Creation of a

Life Insurance Market in China – A Proposal”(www.cas.northwestern.

edu/cics/chung.pdf).

vii

• Customer Service Center (2003); “The under Development Asset for

Customer Retention, Loyalty and Revenue Enhancing Strategies”;

Insurance White Paper (www.knowlagent.com).

• Gidhagen, M. (1998); “Insurance Marketing – Services and

Relationships”; Working Paper No. 4, Foretagseomiska Institution

Uppasala University, department of Business Studies, Uppasala

University (www.ub.uu.se/wop/).

• http://www.ideamarketers.com/?articleid=3382212

• http://www.investmentyogi.com/insurance/understanding-ulips.aspx11

• http://www.irdaindia.org/ar0506/irda_ar0506_eng.pdf

• Kalyanaraman (2007), e-paper Life Insurance - New Regime; Sify

Business Welcome 2007 ; www.Sify.com

• SanjeevSasidharan; III Sem. MBA (Finance & Marketing) TKM

Institute of Management;Kollam, Kerala Customer servicing;

http://www.ecs limited.com/download /Ensuringper

1

POLICY HOLDERS ATTITUDE TOWARDS LIFE INSURANCE AND THEIR AWARENESS AND LIKING FOR UNIT LINKED INSURANCE PLANS

(With special reference to Coimbatore city)

I. Personal Details/ Information 1.1 Name of the respondent (optional) :

1.2 Sex

Male r Female r

1.3 Age

26-30 years r 31 -35 year r 36-40 years r

41-45 years r Above 45 years r

1.4 Marital Status:

Married r Unmarried r

1.5 Educational Qualification

SSLC/Matric r HSC r

Diploma/Technical Education r Under graduate r

Professional qualification r Post graduate r

1.6 Nature of occupation

Business r Retired r Professionals r

Employee r Others r

1.7 You reside in:

Own house r Rental house r

Housing quarters provided by employer r Others ……………… r

1.8 State your Monthly income

Upto `. 10,000 r `. 10,001 – `. 15,000 r

`. 15,001- `.20,000 r `. 20,001 – `. 25,000 r

Above `. 25,000 r 1.9 Number of earning members in the family

1 r 2 r 3 r 4 r 1.10 Number of dependents in the family

1 r 2 r 3 r 4 and above r

1.11 Do you have any other additional sources of earnings?

Yes r No r a) If yes, Please mention the additional sources of earnings.

Rent from building/lands r Animal breeding r

Interest earned r Share/stock for returns r

Spouse r Other sources r

2

1.12 State your distributed monthly income for insurance policy(s):

5% - 10% r 11% - 15% r Above 15% r II. Level of Awareness on Life Insurance Policy 2.1 State your level of awareness on Life Insurance Policy.

High r Medium r Low r 2.2 Which of the below mentioned Public/ private life insurance companies you are aware of ? (Please tick)

LIC r Max New York life r

HDFC Standard r SBI Life r

ICICI Prudential r Met Life r Reliance life insurance r Birla sun life r

Bajaj Allianz r Bharti AXA life r

Tata AIG r Shriram life insurance r Aviva Life r Om Kotak Mahindra r Sahara life insurance r ING Vysya life insurance r 2.3 Do you get sufficient information regarding your insurance company?

Yes r No r a) If yes, state the level of awareness towards the information derived from the

following source:

Source of information Very High

High Neutral Low Very Low

Friends/Relatives Business Channels (TV)

Radio Commercials

Newspapers- Investment-columns Insurance Company Promotional pamphlets

TV Commercials Insurance Agents Insurance Company report

2.4 From which of the below mentioned distribution channel(s) have you learned about your current insurance policy(s):

a. Traditional channel of distribution

Insurance Agent r b. New distribution channel

Direct marketing r Corporate Agents r Internet marketing r Bancassurance r

Retail chains r Independent Financial advisers r Telemarketing r

3

2.5 State your level of awareness on decision making parameter:

Factors Very High

High Neutral Low Very Low

Financial literacy (about insurance plan)

Designing an effective and accessible insurance plan

Financial management Skill Risk tolerance level

III. Investment Attitude 3.1 You would prefer savings in which form?

Bank deposits r Fixed deposits r Investments r Post office schemes r Others (Please specify) ……………………. r

3.2 State your opinion about investment:

Tax saving r Good returns r Better future after retirement r Wealth creation r Others ……....r

3.3 Preferably you would like to invest in:

Mutual funds r Stock and shares r Insurance products r Govt. Bonds & securities r Others ………………………r

3.4 How frequently do you invest?

Once a year r 2-3 times a year r More than 3 times a year r

Not interested r

3.5 State the Reason for investing in Life Insurance products.

Regular returns r Low risk Bonus r Long term benefit r

Future security r Tax benefits r Safety of money r 3.6 Do you agree that Insurance products are susceptible to very low risk when compared to the other options for investment?

Yes r No r Don't know r

3.7 What do you understand by the term wealth insurance?

A tax savings plan r A savings plan with good returns r A financial security and risk coverage for the family r All the above r I have no idea r

4

IV. Insurance Behaviour 4.1 Rank the feature of insurance plan/schemes.

Sl. No Features Rank 1. Bonus 2. Safety of money 3. Regular returns 4. Higher returns 5. Long term benefits 6. Future security 7. Tax benefits 8. Low risk 9. Flexibility

4.2 Number of policies you hold:

Companies For Individual For the family

Total 1-3 4-6 7-9 1-3 4-6 7-9

LIC

Max New York Life

HDFC

SBI Life

ICICI Prudential

Bajaj Allianz

Tata AIG

ING Vysya life

Shriram life

insurance

Birla sun life

Om Kotak Mahindra

Met Life

Reliance life

insurance

Bharti AXA life

Sahara life insurance

Aviva Life

Total

4.3 Mention the Type of insurance policy you have taken.

Endowment Policy r Term Policy r

Money Back Policy r Children’s Policy r Health Insurance policy r Special Plans r Pension Plans or Annuities r Whole life Policy r Unit Linked Policy r Joint Life Policy r

Women’s Policy r Group Insurance Policy r

5

4.4 State the amount of insurance policy:

`. 50,000 or Below r `. 50,001- `. 1,00,000 r

`. 1,00,001- `. 2,00,000 r Above `. 2,00,000 r

4.5 State the amount of premium paid (annually):

Up to `. 10,000 r `. 10,001- `. 20,000 r

`. 20,001- `. 30,000 r Above `. 30,000 r

4.6 State the periodic intervals of premium payment.

Monthly r Quarterly r

Half Yearly r Annually r

Single Premium r

4.7 How do you make payment?

Standing instruction through bank r

Electronic Clearing Service r

Paying personally at branch office r

Payment through credit/debit card r

Through Agent r

Online payment r

M- Commerce r 4.8 State whether the mode of payment is convenient.

Convenient r Not Convenient r V. Unit-Linked Insurance Policy 5.1 Mention the age at which you started saving

21-25years r 26-30years r 31-35years r

36-40years r 41-45years r Above 45 years r 5.2 Are you aware of Unit Linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs) offered by various Insurance Company(s)?

High r Moderate r Low r

5.3 State your level of awareness about the fact that Unit-Linked insurance plan offer

both insurance and investment returns.

Very High r High r Moderate r

Low r Very Low r

6

5.4 Please mention the name of Unit Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) the most you aware. a) b)

c) d) 5.5 Please tick the nature of ULIP policy the most you aware of.

Retirement r Child Growth r

Wealth creation r Health solution r

5.6 Are you aware of types of fund which are available in Unit Linked Insurance policy?

Aware r Not Aware r a) If you are aware, state the level of awareness on the type of fund offered by ULIP.

Types of fund and Risk category Level of awareness

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

Equity funds - (Medium to High Risk)

Income, fixed Interest bond funds - (Medium Risk)

Cash funds – (Low Risk)

Balanced funds (Medium Risk)

5.7 Please, tick your level of risk appetite for Unit Linked Insurance Product. Types of fund and risk category

Equity funds - (Medium to High Risk) r

Income, fixed Interest bond funds - (Medium Risk) r

Cash funds – (Low Risk) r

Balanced funds (Medium Risk) r

7

5.8 State your level of awareness towards Unit-Linked Insurance Plan.

Awareness Very High

High Moderate Low Very Low

Cost structure of the policy Fund management options offered by Insurance Company

Flexibility features an Insurance Company allows in operation

Reputation and performance of the products chosen

Risk in ULIP investments reduces as the time horizon increases

Knowledge on equity market operation Familiar with the financial markets terms and functions

Impact of inflation on the earning in long –term

5.9 State your level of awareness about the operational feature of ULIP.

Awareness Level of awareness

Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

Fund management options offered by Insurance Company

Flexibility features an Insurance Company allows in operation

Reputation and performance of the products chosen

Risk in ULIP investments reduces as the time horizon increases

Knowledge on equity market operation

Familiar with the financial markets terms and functions

Impact of inflation on the earning in long - term

Particular Range

Rate of returns (the amount which you get in return)

Extra returns for extra investments Returns constant in all conditions (No opportunity for multiple returns)

Can give huge returns but high risk (no guarantee of even min returns)

8

5.10 Are you aware of a number of changes made by IRDA in the structure and framework of ULIP, recently?

Awareness Level of awareness

Fully Aware

Partially Aware

Some What

Un Aware

No Idea

Move away from high upfront charges

Changes in lock-in-period (Increased to 5 years)

Higher risk cover other than pension and annuities.

Guaranteed return for pension product: minimum guaranteed return of 4.5% p.a.

Rationalisation of surrender charges

5.11 Mention the level of awareness on various charges that are applicable in ULIP policy.

Various charges applicable on the ULIP policy

Level of awareness Very High High Moderate Low Very Low

Premium allocation charges

Mortality charges

Policy Administration charge

Fund Management charge

Surrender charges

Fund switching charges

5.12. Rank the Reason for considering ULIP policy as prosperous. (Rank as 1, 2, 3 and so on………..)

Reasons Rank Continuously monitoring of chance

Planning the policy holding according to the need at any point of time

Directing the protection aspects savings of the policy

Transparency (Investors are aware of the status of their investment at all times)

Liquidity (Partial withdrawal)

High return (can give huge return but high risk)

Combination of risk cover and insurance

9

VI Level of Satisfaction 6.1 State your level of satisfaction the services rendered by your life insurance Company(s).

Service Rendered Level of Satisfaction

Highly satisfied

Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly

dissatisfied Intimation of Premium Bonus Variety of policies

Loan facility

Terms of policies Convenience

Response to enquiry at office

Agents response

Customer treatment

Communication

Claims settlement, if any

Others 6.2 State your level of satisfaction towards agencies service rendered by your life insurance company (s).

Service Rendered Level of Satisfaction

Highly satisfied

Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly

dissatisfied Distribution of Pamphlets and brochures

Application filling procedures

Obtaining medical certificate

Provision of timely information

Service rendered by Agent during claim settlement

Others 6.3 Had you submitted any policy for claim?

Yes r No r

10

a) If yes, state the experience in getting the claim settlement.

Hassle free settlement r

Dispirited settlement r b) If it is dispirited settlement, state the reason.

Delayed by employees r

Duration of investigation r

Slow process r

Lack of Response by the Agent r 6.4. Have you discontinued your policy before?

Discontinued r Not Discontinued r a) If yes, state the reason for discontinued.

Financial constraint r

Opted for alternative investment r

Not satisfied with service r

Switched over to better company r 6.5 Will you recommend your company to your friends and relatives to take insurance policy?

Yes r No r VII Perception

7.1 State your level of perception towards the reasons stated for the growth of insurance companies in India.

Perception Level of perception

Strongly Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree

Change in the attitude of the population towards life insurance

Open and transparent environment created under the IRDA

Well-established distribution network

Trained professionals to build and sell the products

Stringent accounting practice to prevent failures amongst the insurance

Government support (level playing field at all stages of development)

11

7.2 Kindly provide your valuable suggestion for the enhancement of the study:

THANK U

ANNEXURE - II DATA ANALYSIS TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES

For measuring various phenomena and analyzing the collected data

effectively and efficiently to draw sound conclusions, a number of statistical

techniques are used. The statistical tools applied in this study are:Frequency

distribution, Weighted Average Mean, Likert’s Scaling Technique, Kendall’s

coefficient of concordance, One-way ANOVA, Chi–Square test, Rotated

Factor Analysis, Reliability and ANOVA and Multiple Regression Modelhave

been used for the testing of hypotheses.

The primary data required for the study had been collected with the help

of structured interview schedule. The secondary data needed for the study were

extracted from various books, magazines, journals, internet and thesis works.

The data collected are analysed and tabulated with the help of SPSS package

version 19.

a. Frequency distribution

The frequency distributions of the variables were calculated with the

help of simple percentage, by writing the formula FD = F/N x 100, where F

(frequency) denotes the number of respondents, and N denotes the total number

of sample population.

b. Weighted Arithmetic Mean

One of the most important objectives of statistical analysis is to get one

single value that describes the characteristic of the entire mass of entire data.

Such a value is called the central value or an “average” means or the expected

value of the variable, what the statisticians call the arithmetic mean. The

process of computing mean in case of individual observation (i.e),where

frequencies are not given is very simple. Add together the various values of the

variable and divide the total by the number of items. The researcher has applied

weighted mean, instead of calculating the simple mean to obtain a realistic

average.

� � = ∑� � � �

∑� �

where � � = Weighted mean

Wi = Weight of i th item X

Xj= value of the j th item of X

c. Summated scales (Likert’s-scales)

Summated scales (or Likert’s- type scales) are developed by utilizing the

item analysis approach where in a particular item is evaluated on the basis of

how well it discriminates between those persons whose total score is high and

those whose score is low. Those items or statements that best meet this sort of

discrimination test are included in the final instrument. In a Likert’s Scale, the

respondent is asked to respond to each statement in terms of several degrees,

usually three and five degree of agreement (or) disagreement. Each point on the

scale carries a score of 3, 2, 1 and 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1. Score calculation is as

follows:scaling describes the procedure of assigning numbers to various

degrees of opinion, attitude and other concepts.

d.Chi-square analysis

The chi-square test is an important test amongst the several tests of

significance developed by statisticians. Chi-square, symbolically written as χ2

(pronounced as ki-square), is a non-parametric test, and can be used to

determine if categorical data shows dependency or the two classifications are

independent.

Chi-square as a test of independence enables a researcher to explain

whether or not two attributes are associated.

χ2 are calculated as follows:

χ � =∑(� � � − � � � )�

� � �

whereoij =observed frequency of the cell in ‘i’th row and ‘j’th column

eij=expected frequency of the cell in ‘i’th row and ‘j’th column

The χ2 values obtained as such should be compared with relevant table

value of χ2 and the inference can be drawn. If the calculated value is greater

than the table value the hypothesis framed will be rejected, otherwise accepted.

e. ANOVA (F-Test)

Two way ANOVA techniques is used when the data are classified on the

basis of two factors. ANOVA.The F-test is named in honour of the great

statistician R.A. Fisher. The objective of the F-test is to find out whether the

two independent estimates of population variance differ significantly, or

whether the two samples may be regarded as drawn from the normal

populations having the same variance. The formulae used in the analysis of

variance (ANOVA table) classification model is :

The ratio of F = iancecolumnWithin

iancecolumnBetween

var

var

i.e., F = 2

2

2

1

V

V

g. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance

Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, represented by the symbol W, is

an important nonparametric measure of relationship. It is used for determining

the degree of association among several (k) sets of ranking of N objects or

individuals.

W =�

��

� �� k^2(N3 − N)

Where s = ∑(Rj -Rj)2

k=no of sets of ranking i.e., the number of judges;

N=number of objects ranked;

(1/12) k2 (N3-N) = maximum possible sum of the squared deviations i.e.

the sum as which would occur with perfect agreement among k rankings

g. Reliability

The validity of a test is the extent to which differences in scores reflect

differences in the measured characteristic. Predictive validity is a measure of

the usefulness of a measuring instrument as a predictor. Proof of predictive

validity is determined by the correlation between results and actual behavior.

Construct validity is the extent to which a measuring instrument measures what

it intends to measure. Reliability is the extent to which a measurement is

repeatable with the same results. A measurement may be reliable and not valid.

However, if a measurement is valid, then it is also reliable and if it is not

reliable, then it cannot be valid. One way to show reliability is to show stability

by repeating the test with the same results.

Reliability analysis may be used to construct reliable measurement

scales, to improve existing scales, and to evaluate the reliability of scales

already in use. Specifically, Reliability and Item Analysis will aid in the design

and evaluation of sum scales, that is, scales that are made up of multiple

individual measurements (e.g., different items, repeated measurements,

different measurement devices, etc.). It can compute numerous statistics that

allows researcher to build and evaluate scales following the so-called classical

testing theory model.

From the above discussion, one can easily infer a measure or statistics to

describe the reliability of an item or scale. Specifically, we may define an index

of reliability in terms of the proportion of true score variability that is captured

across subjects or respondents, relative to the total observed variability. In

equation form, we can say:

Reliability = 2(true score) /

2(total observed)

Cronbach's Alpha : The proportion of true score variance that is captured by the

items by comparing the sum of item variances with the variance of the sum

scale. Specifically, can be compute: = (k/(k-1)) * [1- (s2i)/s

2sum]

If the sum scale is perfectly reliable, it would expect that the two halves

are perfectly correlated (i.e., r = 1.0). Less than perfect reliability will lead to

less than perfect correlations.

h. Rotation Factor analysis

The factor analysis is another multivariate technique. It is an extremely

powerful and useful analytic approach to psychological, behavioral, financial

and other types of data. It is a statistical technique for determining the

underlying factors or forces among a large number of interdependent variables

of measures. It is a method for extracting common factor variances from a set

of observations. It groups the number of variables of smaller set of uncorrelated

factors potentially conveying a great deal of information.

• Factor: A factor is an underlying dimension that account for several

observed variables. There can be one or more factors, depending upon

the naturel of the study and the number of variables involved in it.

• Factor –loading: Factor-loading are those values which explain how

closely the variables are related to each one of the factors discovered.

They are also known as factors-variable correlations. In fact, factor-

loadings work as key to understanding what the factors mean. It is the

absolute size (rather than the signs, plus or minus) of the loadings that is

important in the interpretation of a factor.

• Communality(h2): Communality, symbolized as h2, shows how much of

each variable is accounted for by the underlying factors taken together.

A high value of communality means that not much of the variable is left

over after whatever the factors represent is taken into consideration. It is

worked out in respect of each variable as under:

H2 of the ith variable= (ith factor loading of factor A)2= (ith factor

loading of factor B)2

• Eigen Value: Eigen value (or Latent Root) is the sum of squared values

of factor loadings relating to a factor. It indicates the relative importance

of each in accounting for the particular set of variables under study.

• Total sum of squares: When Eigen values of all factors are totaled, the

resulting value is called the total of squares. Rotations reveal different

structures in the data. If the factors are independent, orthogonal rotation

is done, and if they are corrected, an oblique rotation is made. Factor

score represents the degree to which each respondent gets high scores on

the group of item that load high on each factor. Factor scores are used in

several other multivariate analyses.

i. Multiple Regressions

Multiple Linear Regression Analysis is a technique for modeling the

linear relationship between two or more variables. It is one of the most widely

used of all statistical methods. In this study five multiple regression modeling

has been applied.

Multiple Regression Modeling has been applied to measure:

v Association between the monthly family income and the

insurance saving allocation

v Policy holders’ level of awareness towards ULIP

v Level of awareness about the operational feature ofULIP

v Policy holders’ level of awareness about changes made in ULIP

operation by IRDA

v Policy holders’ level of awareness on various charges applicable

in ULIP policy operations

The general linear regression model, with normal error terms, simply of

X variables is shown in equation 1.

Yi=β0+ β1Xi1+ β2Xi2+…….+βp-1Xip-1+εi

Where β0, β1,………,βp-1 are parameters, Xi1, Xi2. ………, Xip-1 are known

constants, εi are independent N(0,σ2), i=1, 2, 3, ……. N.

Y= α + β1X1 + β2X2 +β3X3 + β4X4 + β5X5 + β6X6 + β7X7 +β8X8

+β9X9 +…..+ e.

Where, α is constant and β1, β2, β3, β4, β5, …. are coefficients to

estimate, and e is the error term, which the authors assumed as NID for this

research

The entire hypothesis test in this study has been carried out at 5 percent

level of significance. A research student quite often faces measurement

problem, especially when the concepts to be measured are complex and

abstract and there are no standardized measurement tools.


Recommended