i
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Books
Gupta S.P.,Statistical Methods, 30th Revised Edition, Sultan Chand & Sons
Publications New Delhi, 2001.
Kothari C.R., Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques, Second
Edition, New Age International (P) Ltd., New Delhi. 2000.
Krishna Swami O.R, M. Ranganatham; Methodology of Research in Social
Sciences, Himalaya Publishing House, New Delhi.2006.
Journals, Magazines, Reports and Thesis
Abhishek Kumar Mahto (2011); “Analyzing the Consumer Preference
Towards Various Unit Linked Insurance Plan In India of IDBI
FORTIS”, Submitted For the Partial Fulfillments of, Post Graduate
Diploma In Mangement 2010-2011, IIMT Professional College,
Meerut.
Arindam Gupta and Rabindranath De Dalal (2008); “An Inquiry into
Structural Adjustment in Indian Life Insurance Sector”; GITAM
Journal of Management, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 55-79, Jan-Mar.
Arora, R.S. (1992); “Marketing of Services: A Study of LIC in Jalandhar
Division”, Ph.D Thesis, Department of Commerce and Business
Management, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar.
Asokan T. (2007); “Re-Entry of Private Insurers in India – A
Surveillance”; Department of Management studies, Kannur
University- Kerala; SAJOSPS, January – June.
Banumathy, S., and M. Subasini (2004); “Attitude of Policyholders towards
Life Insurance Business in Virdhunagar”; The Insurance Times,
Vol. xxiv, No.7, pp:25-28.
ii
Banumathy, S., and S. Manickam (2004); “Customer Services provided by
Life Insurance Corporation of India – A Case Study”; The
Insurance Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 6, pp: 30-33.
Bhasin, S. (2004); “Ensuring Insurance”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv,
Issue 1, pp: 34-37. Coimbatore Corporation; City Development
Plan; July 2006.
Consumer Voice Report on the Insurance Sector (2006); “Study shows that
Private Insurers more responsive to Consumer Needs”; IRDA
Private Sector, Consumer online Foundation.
Dalal, R.De, and A. Gupta (2004); “Profitability of Contemporary Life
Insurance Schemes – A Comparative study between LICI and Tata-
AIG”; The Management Accountant, vol. 39, No. 11, pp: 926-29.
Dhanda, R.L. (2004); “Divisional Performance Evaluation of LIC Business
in Northern Zone”; Finance India, Vol. xviii, No. 1, pp: 229-33.
Gahelot, B.D. (2000); “Disquisition of Life Insurance Business”; Monthly
Public Opinion Surveys, Vol. xlv, No. 10, pp: 35-39.
Gupta, P.K. (2003); “Branding in Insurance – An Indian Exposition”;The
insurance Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 10, pp: 30-34, 48.
Harris Interactive Inc. (2003); “A Study about Life Insurance Policies”;
Public Relation Research, Insurance Marketplace Standards
Association (IMSA) (www.imsaethics.org).
Hemanth C.R (2010); “A comparative study of ULIP plans of reliance life
insurance with mutual funds”, Submitted at partial fulfillment of
the award of the Degree of Bachelor of Business Administration
(2008-2010) Tecnia Institute of Advanced Studies, Delhi.
Jawaharal, U., and N. Pareek (2004); “Customer Service in Life
Insurance”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv, Issue iv, pp: 17-19.
iii
Joy Chakraborty, Research Associate (2006), “Private Life Insurance
Companies in India: Growing Prospects and Challenges”-, The
ICFAI Business School Research Center, Kolkata.
Jyoti Rana (2008); “Insurance Advertising – A Creative approach to
Provide Security to Life”; Advertising Express, The ICFAI
University Press, May.
Kalra, R.K., and D.K. Garg (1999); “AIDA Model and Rural Marketing
with Special Reference to LIC Policies”; Management Stream,
Vol. 1, No. 1, pp: 56-59.
Kumar, R. (2004); “World Insurance and India”; The Insurance Times,
Vol. xxiv, No. 5, pp: 19-23.
Kumar, R., and K. Vaidya (2004); “Differentiation Strategies of Life
Insurance Companies”; Insurance Chronicle, Vol. iv, Issue 3, pp:
43-49.
Lal, R., and N. Dhanda (2003); “Life Insurance Corporation of India
Devising its Strategies to Meet the challenges of Insurance Sector
Reforms”; National Seminar on Emerging Trends in Financial
Services and International Business, Guru Jambheshwar
University, Hisar.
Malliga, R. (2000); “Marketing of LIC Policies – A Study on Agents
Tirunelveli Division”; Indian Journal of Marketing, Vol. xxx, No.
8-10, pp: 6-9.
Mohanty, A.K, and P.K. Sahu (2004); “Opportunities and Challenges of
Services marketing in the Liberalized Era”; Employment News,
January 3-9, Vol. xxviii, No. 40, New Delhi, pp: 1-2.
iv
Monica C. Singh and SantoshDhar (2007); “Customer’s Perception of
Factors affecting Selection of Life Insurance Products”; NMIMS
journal January-July.
Murlidhar, S. (2001); “A Study of Marketing strategies of Life Insurance
Corporation of India”, Ph.D. Thesis, Bangalore University,
Bangalore.
Muthusamy A. and A. Meera (2008), “Wind of changing life insurance
market in India; market survey”; Fact for you; March.
Parasnis, P. (2001); “Distribution of Life Insurance – An Industry in
Transition”; Monthly Public Opinion Surveys, Vol. xlvi, No. 11,
pp: 27-31.
Pathak, P., and S. Singh (2003); “Increasing Competitiveness through
Marketing – A Case Study of Life Insurance Corporation of
India”; The Alternative, Journal of Management Studies and
Research, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp: 27-31.
Patil, K.S. (2003); “Life Insurance Corporation of India, Its Products and
their Performance Evaluation: A Special Reference to Gulbarage
District”; Finance India, Vol. xvii, No. 3, pp: 1037- 40.
Phatak and Dhar (2003); “Role of Non-Banking Finance Companies in
Insurance Sector: challenges and Opportunities”; Journal of
Insurance and Risk Management, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp: 117-128.
Ramamurthy, N. (1992); “Journey towards Complete Customer
Satisfaction”; Yogaksheema, Vol. 36, No. 9, pp: 20-22.
Raman, N., and C. Gayathri (2004); “A Study on Customers Awareness
towards New Insurance Companies”; Indian Journal of Marketing,
Vol. xxxiv, No. 1, pp: 25-27.
v
Ramanathan .K.V (2011); A project on “A study on policy holders
satisfaction with special reference to life insurance corporation of
India, Thanjavur division, Bharathidasan University, 2011
Reagan, B., Brostoff, S., and M.A. Hofmann (2001); “Added Value Key to
Agent/Broker survival”, “Insurers Vow to Keep Agents as Key
Distribution Component”, “Bank/Broker Deals Having Little effect
on Risk Managers”; National Underwriter, Vol. 105, No. 29,
Business Insurance, Vol. 14, pp: 132-152.
Reddy, V.A., and G.N. Murthy (1996); “Customer Services in LIC – A
Case Study”; Indian Journal of Marketing, vol. xxv, No. 4, pp: 18-
22.
Reddy, V.A., and G.N. Murthy (1996); “Privatization of Life Insurance –
An Analysis”; Indian Journal of Commerce, Vol. xlix, No. 188,
Part 3, pp: 62-66.
Sahoo, S.C. (2004); “A Comparative Analysis: LIC’s Komal Jeevan vs.
ICICI’s Smart Kid & Tata-AIG’s Mahalife Junior”; The Insurance
Times, Vol. xxiv, No. 2, pp: 22-27.
Saibaba, R. (2002); “Perception and Attitude of Women towards Life
Insurance Policies”; Indian Journal of Marketing, Vol. xxxii, No.
12, pp: 10-12.
Sandhu H.S and Neetu Bala (2006); “Marketing of Life Insurance Services
Revisited”; Department of Commerce & Business Management,
Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar; Indian Management
Studies Journal 10, pp: 1-33.
Selvavinayagam K .and Mathivanan R. (2010); “A study on policy holders
preference and satisfaction of services rendered by selected life
insurance companies in Tamilnadu, Namakal district”,
vi
International Journal of Marketing and Trade policy, Vol 2, No.1-
2, (Jan- Dec 2010):47-5 6.
Sonal Ginodia (2010); “Consumer Preference of ULIP (Unit Linked
Insurance Policy), Submitted in Partial Fulfillments of the
Requirement for the award of the Degree of Master Of Risk &
Insurance Management,” (2008-2010), Faculty of Commerce
Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi.
Sridevi P. (2012); “Study of Buying Behaviour of Consumers Towards Life
Insurance Policies In Perambalur District”, IJRMEC Volume 2,
Issue 5(May 2012) ISSN: 2250-057X
Subhasis Ray (2007); “Segmentation on Investment in Personal Insurance
and Determination of Insurance Needs through Human Life Value
Modeling”; Management & Labour Studies, Vol. 32, No. 1,
February.
Sundar, K., and R.R. Babu (2001); “Marketing of Insurance Services”;
Third Concept, Vol. 15, No. 173, pp: 30-33.
Task Force (1997); “Why Some Americans Do and Don’t Tolerate
Insurance Fraud – A Study on Public Attitudes”; Coalition against
Insurance Frauds, (www.InsuranceFraud.org).
Vineet Kumar (2008 -2010); “Comparative Analysis of ULIP Plans With
Reference To Idbi Fortis And Birla Sunlife”, MBA Dissertation,
IIMT Group of Colleges, IDBI Fortis in association with Federal
Bank, IDBI Fortis Life Insurance Co Ltd.
Web sites
• Cheris, S.C. Chan (2000); “Marketing Insurance A Way of Life:
Cultural Resistance and Global-Local Dynamics in the Creation of a
Life Insurance Market in China – A Proposal”(www.cas.northwestern.
edu/cics/chung.pdf).
vii
• Customer Service Center (2003); “The under Development Asset for
Customer Retention, Loyalty and Revenue Enhancing Strategies”;
Insurance White Paper (www.knowlagent.com).
• Gidhagen, M. (1998); “Insurance Marketing – Services and
Relationships”; Working Paper No. 4, Foretagseomiska Institution
Uppasala University, department of Business Studies, Uppasala
University (www.ub.uu.se/wop/).
• http://www.ideamarketers.com/?articleid=3382212
• http://www.investmentyogi.com/insurance/understanding-ulips.aspx11
• http://www.irdaindia.org/ar0506/irda_ar0506_eng.pdf
• Kalyanaraman (2007), e-paper Life Insurance - New Regime; Sify
Business Welcome 2007 ; www.Sify.com
• SanjeevSasidharan; III Sem. MBA (Finance & Marketing) TKM
Institute of Management;Kollam, Kerala Customer servicing;
http://www.ecs limited.com/download /Ensuringper
1
POLICY HOLDERS ATTITUDE TOWARDS LIFE INSURANCE AND THEIR AWARENESS AND LIKING FOR UNIT LINKED INSURANCE PLANS
(With special reference to Coimbatore city)
I. Personal Details/ Information 1.1 Name of the respondent (optional) :
1.2 Sex
Male r Female r
1.3 Age
26-30 years r 31 -35 year r 36-40 years r
41-45 years r Above 45 years r
1.4 Marital Status:
Married r Unmarried r
1.5 Educational Qualification
SSLC/Matric r HSC r
Diploma/Technical Education r Under graduate r
Professional qualification r Post graduate r
1.6 Nature of occupation
Business r Retired r Professionals r
Employee r Others r
1.7 You reside in:
Own house r Rental house r
Housing quarters provided by employer r Others ……………… r
1.8 State your Monthly income
Upto `. 10,000 r `. 10,001 – `. 15,000 r
`. 15,001- `.20,000 r `. 20,001 – `. 25,000 r
Above `. 25,000 r 1.9 Number of earning members in the family
1 r 2 r 3 r 4 r 1.10 Number of dependents in the family
1 r 2 r 3 r 4 and above r
1.11 Do you have any other additional sources of earnings?
Yes r No r a) If yes, Please mention the additional sources of earnings.
Rent from building/lands r Animal breeding r
Interest earned r Share/stock for returns r
Spouse r Other sources r
2
1.12 State your distributed monthly income for insurance policy(s):
5% - 10% r 11% - 15% r Above 15% r II. Level of Awareness on Life Insurance Policy 2.1 State your level of awareness on Life Insurance Policy.
High r Medium r Low r 2.2 Which of the below mentioned Public/ private life insurance companies you are aware of ? (Please tick)
LIC r Max New York life r
HDFC Standard r SBI Life r
ICICI Prudential r Met Life r Reliance life insurance r Birla sun life r
Bajaj Allianz r Bharti AXA life r
Tata AIG r Shriram life insurance r Aviva Life r Om Kotak Mahindra r Sahara life insurance r ING Vysya life insurance r 2.3 Do you get sufficient information regarding your insurance company?
Yes r No r a) If yes, state the level of awareness towards the information derived from the
following source:
Source of information Very High
High Neutral Low Very Low
Friends/Relatives Business Channels (TV)
Radio Commercials
Newspapers- Investment-columns Insurance Company Promotional pamphlets
TV Commercials Insurance Agents Insurance Company report
2.4 From which of the below mentioned distribution channel(s) have you learned about your current insurance policy(s):
a. Traditional channel of distribution
Insurance Agent r b. New distribution channel
Direct marketing r Corporate Agents r Internet marketing r Bancassurance r
Retail chains r Independent Financial advisers r Telemarketing r
3
2.5 State your level of awareness on decision making parameter:
Factors Very High
High Neutral Low Very Low
Financial literacy (about insurance plan)
Designing an effective and accessible insurance plan
Financial management Skill Risk tolerance level
III. Investment Attitude 3.1 You would prefer savings in which form?
Bank deposits r Fixed deposits r Investments r Post office schemes r Others (Please specify) ……………………. r
3.2 State your opinion about investment:
Tax saving r Good returns r Better future after retirement r Wealth creation r Others ……....r
3.3 Preferably you would like to invest in:
Mutual funds r Stock and shares r Insurance products r Govt. Bonds & securities r Others ………………………r
3.4 How frequently do you invest?
Once a year r 2-3 times a year r More than 3 times a year r
Not interested r
3.5 State the Reason for investing in Life Insurance products.
Regular returns r Low risk Bonus r Long term benefit r
Future security r Tax benefits r Safety of money r 3.6 Do you agree that Insurance products are susceptible to very low risk when compared to the other options for investment?
Yes r No r Don't know r
3.7 What do you understand by the term wealth insurance?
A tax savings plan r A savings plan with good returns r A financial security and risk coverage for the family r All the above r I have no idea r
4
IV. Insurance Behaviour 4.1 Rank the feature of insurance plan/schemes.
Sl. No Features Rank 1. Bonus 2. Safety of money 3. Regular returns 4. Higher returns 5. Long term benefits 6. Future security 7. Tax benefits 8. Low risk 9. Flexibility
4.2 Number of policies you hold:
Companies For Individual For the family
Total 1-3 4-6 7-9 1-3 4-6 7-9
LIC
Max New York Life
HDFC
SBI Life
ICICI Prudential
Bajaj Allianz
Tata AIG
ING Vysya life
Shriram life
insurance
Birla sun life
Om Kotak Mahindra
Met Life
Reliance life
insurance
Bharti AXA life
Sahara life insurance
Aviva Life
Total
4.3 Mention the Type of insurance policy you have taken.
Endowment Policy r Term Policy r
Money Back Policy r Children’s Policy r Health Insurance policy r Special Plans r Pension Plans or Annuities r Whole life Policy r Unit Linked Policy r Joint Life Policy r
Women’s Policy r Group Insurance Policy r
5
4.4 State the amount of insurance policy:
`. 50,000 or Below r `. 50,001- `. 1,00,000 r
`. 1,00,001- `. 2,00,000 r Above `. 2,00,000 r
4.5 State the amount of premium paid (annually):
Up to `. 10,000 r `. 10,001- `. 20,000 r
`. 20,001- `. 30,000 r Above `. 30,000 r
4.6 State the periodic intervals of premium payment.
Monthly r Quarterly r
Half Yearly r Annually r
Single Premium r
4.7 How do you make payment?
Standing instruction through bank r
Electronic Clearing Service r
Paying personally at branch office r
Payment through credit/debit card r
Through Agent r
Online payment r
M- Commerce r 4.8 State whether the mode of payment is convenient.
Convenient r Not Convenient r V. Unit-Linked Insurance Policy 5.1 Mention the age at which you started saving
21-25years r 26-30years r 31-35years r
36-40years r 41-45years r Above 45 years r 5.2 Are you aware of Unit Linked Insurance Plans (ULIPs) offered by various Insurance Company(s)?
High r Moderate r Low r
5.3 State your level of awareness about the fact that Unit-Linked insurance plan offer
both insurance and investment returns.
Very High r High r Moderate r
Low r Very Low r
6
5.4 Please mention the name of Unit Linked Insurance Plan (ULIP) the most you aware. a) b)
c) d) 5.5 Please tick the nature of ULIP policy the most you aware of.
Retirement r Child Growth r
Wealth creation r Health solution r
5.6 Are you aware of types of fund which are available in Unit Linked Insurance policy?
Aware r Not Aware r a) If you are aware, state the level of awareness on the type of fund offered by ULIP.
Types of fund and Risk category Level of awareness
Very High High Moderate Low Very Low
Equity funds - (Medium to High Risk)
Income, fixed Interest bond funds - (Medium Risk)
Cash funds – (Low Risk)
Balanced funds (Medium Risk)
5.7 Please, tick your level of risk appetite for Unit Linked Insurance Product. Types of fund and risk category
Equity funds - (Medium to High Risk) r
Income, fixed Interest bond funds - (Medium Risk) r
Cash funds – (Low Risk) r
Balanced funds (Medium Risk) r
7
5.8 State your level of awareness towards Unit-Linked Insurance Plan.
Awareness Very High
High Moderate Low Very Low
Cost structure of the policy Fund management options offered by Insurance Company
Flexibility features an Insurance Company allows in operation
Reputation and performance of the products chosen
Risk in ULIP investments reduces as the time horizon increases
Knowledge on equity market operation Familiar with the financial markets terms and functions
Impact of inflation on the earning in long –term
5.9 State your level of awareness about the operational feature of ULIP.
Awareness Level of awareness
Very High High Moderate Low Very Low
Fund management options offered by Insurance Company
Flexibility features an Insurance Company allows in operation
Reputation and performance of the products chosen
Risk in ULIP investments reduces as the time horizon increases
Knowledge on equity market operation
Familiar with the financial markets terms and functions
Impact of inflation on the earning in long - term
Particular Range
Rate of returns (the amount which you get in return)
Extra returns for extra investments Returns constant in all conditions (No opportunity for multiple returns)
Can give huge returns but high risk (no guarantee of even min returns)
8
5.10 Are you aware of a number of changes made by IRDA in the structure and framework of ULIP, recently?
Awareness Level of awareness
Fully Aware
Partially Aware
Some What
Un Aware
No Idea
Move away from high upfront charges
Changes in lock-in-period (Increased to 5 years)
Higher risk cover other than pension and annuities.
Guaranteed return for pension product: minimum guaranteed return of 4.5% p.a.
Rationalisation of surrender charges
5.11 Mention the level of awareness on various charges that are applicable in ULIP policy.
Various charges applicable on the ULIP policy
Level of awareness Very High High Moderate Low Very Low
Premium allocation charges
Mortality charges
Policy Administration charge
Fund Management charge
Surrender charges
Fund switching charges
5.12. Rank the Reason for considering ULIP policy as prosperous. (Rank as 1, 2, 3 and so on………..)
Reasons Rank Continuously monitoring of chance
Planning the policy holding according to the need at any point of time
Directing the protection aspects savings of the policy
Transparency (Investors are aware of the status of their investment at all times)
Liquidity (Partial withdrawal)
High return (can give huge return but high risk)
Combination of risk cover and insurance
9
VI Level of Satisfaction 6.1 State your level of satisfaction the services rendered by your life insurance Company(s).
Service Rendered Level of Satisfaction
Highly satisfied
Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
dissatisfied Intimation of Premium Bonus Variety of policies
Loan facility
Terms of policies Convenience
Response to enquiry at office
Agents response
Customer treatment
Communication
Claims settlement, if any
Others 6.2 State your level of satisfaction towards agencies service rendered by your life insurance company (s).
Service Rendered Level of Satisfaction
Highly satisfied
Satisfied Neutral Dissatisfied Highly
dissatisfied Distribution of Pamphlets and brochures
Application filling procedures
Obtaining medical certificate
Provision of timely information
Service rendered by Agent during claim settlement
Others 6.3 Had you submitted any policy for claim?
Yes r No r
10
a) If yes, state the experience in getting the claim settlement.
Hassle free settlement r
Dispirited settlement r b) If it is dispirited settlement, state the reason.
Delayed by employees r
Duration of investigation r
Slow process r
Lack of Response by the Agent r 6.4. Have you discontinued your policy before?
Discontinued r Not Discontinued r a) If yes, state the reason for discontinued.
Financial constraint r
Opted for alternative investment r
Not satisfied with service r
Switched over to better company r 6.5 Will you recommend your company to your friends and relatives to take insurance policy?
Yes r No r VII Perception
7.1 State your level of perception towards the reasons stated for the growth of insurance companies in India.
Perception Level of perception
Strongly Agree
Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree
Change in the attitude of the population towards life insurance
Open and transparent environment created under the IRDA
Well-established distribution network
Trained professionals to build and sell the products
Stringent accounting practice to prevent failures amongst the insurance
Government support (level playing field at all stages of development)
ANNEXURE - II DATA ANALYSIS TOOLS AND TECHNIQUES
For measuring various phenomena and analyzing the collected data
effectively and efficiently to draw sound conclusions, a number of statistical
techniques are used. The statistical tools applied in this study are:Frequency
distribution, Weighted Average Mean, Likert’s Scaling Technique, Kendall’s
coefficient of concordance, One-way ANOVA, Chi–Square test, Rotated
Factor Analysis, Reliability and ANOVA and Multiple Regression Modelhave
been used for the testing of hypotheses.
The primary data required for the study had been collected with the help
of structured interview schedule. The secondary data needed for the study were
extracted from various books, magazines, journals, internet and thesis works.
The data collected are analysed and tabulated with the help of SPSS package
version 19.
a. Frequency distribution
The frequency distributions of the variables were calculated with the
help of simple percentage, by writing the formula FD = F/N x 100, where F
(frequency) denotes the number of respondents, and N denotes the total number
of sample population.
b. Weighted Arithmetic Mean
One of the most important objectives of statistical analysis is to get one
single value that describes the characteristic of the entire mass of entire data.
Such a value is called the central value or an “average” means or the expected
value of the variable, what the statisticians call the arithmetic mean. The
process of computing mean in case of individual observation (i.e),where
frequencies are not given is very simple. Add together the various values of the
variable and divide the total by the number of items. The researcher has applied
weighted mean, instead of calculating the simple mean to obtain a realistic
average.
� � = ∑� � � �
∑� �
where � � = Weighted mean
Wi = Weight of i th item X
Xj= value of the j th item of X
c. Summated scales (Likert’s-scales)
Summated scales (or Likert’s- type scales) are developed by utilizing the
item analysis approach where in a particular item is evaluated on the basis of
how well it discriminates between those persons whose total score is high and
those whose score is low. Those items or statements that best meet this sort of
discrimination test are included in the final instrument. In a Likert’s Scale, the
respondent is asked to respond to each statement in terms of several degrees,
usually three and five degree of agreement (or) disagreement. Each point on the
scale carries a score of 3, 2, 1 and 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1. Score calculation is as
follows:scaling describes the procedure of assigning numbers to various
degrees of opinion, attitude and other concepts.
d.Chi-square analysis
The chi-square test is an important test amongst the several tests of
significance developed by statisticians. Chi-square, symbolically written as χ2
(pronounced as ki-square), is a non-parametric test, and can be used to
determine if categorical data shows dependency or the two classifications are
independent.
Chi-square as a test of independence enables a researcher to explain
whether or not two attributes are associated.
χ2 are calculated as follows:
χ � =∑(� � � − � � � )�
� � �
whereoij =observed frequency of the cell in ‘i’th row and ‘j’th column
eij=expected frequency of the cell in ‘i’th row and ‘j’th column
The χ2 values obtained as such should be compared with relevant table
value of χ2 and the inference can be drawn. If the calculated value is greater
than the table value the hypothesis framed will be rejected, otherwise accepted.
e. ANOVA (F-Test)
Two way ANOVA techniques is used when the data are classified on the
basis of two factors. ANOVA.The F-test is named in honour of the great
statistician R.A. Fisher. The objective of the F-test is to find out whether the
two independent estimates of population variance differ significantly, or
whether the two samples may be regarded as drawn from the normal
populations having the same variance. The formulae used in the analysis of
variance (ANOVA table) classification model is :
The ratio of F = iancecolumnWithin
iancecolumnBetween
var
var
−
−
i.e., F = 2
2
2
1
V
V
g. Kendall’s coefficient of concordance
Kendall’s coefficient of concordance, represented by the symbol W, is
an important nonparametric measure of relationship. It is used for determining
the degree of association among several (k) sets of ranking of N objects or
individuals.
W =�
��
� �� k^2(N3 − N)
Where s = ∑(Rj -Rj)2
k=no of sets of ranking i.e., the number of judges;
N=number of objects ranked;
(1/12) k2 (N3-N) = maximum possible sum of the squared deviations i.e.
the sum as which would occur with perfect agreement among k rankings
g. Reliability
The validity of a test is the extent to which differences in scores reflect
differences in the measured characteristic. Predictive validity is a measure of
the usefulness of a measuring instrument as a predictor. Proof of predictive
validity is determined by the correlation between results and actual behavior.
Construct validity is the extent to which a measuring instrument measures what
it intends to measure. Reliability is the extent to which a measurement is
repeatable with the same results. A measurement may be reliable and not valid.
However, if a measurement is valid, then it is also reliable and if it is not
reliable, then it cannot be valid. One way to show reliability is to show stability
by repeating the test with the same results.
Reliability analysis may be used to construct reliable measurement
scales, to improve existing scales, and to evaluate the reliability of scales
already in use. Specifically, Reliability and Item Analysis will aid in the design
and evaluation of sum scales, that is, scales that are made up of multiple
individual measurements (e.g., different items, repeated measurements,
different measurement devices, etc.). It can compute numerous statistics that
allows researcher to build and evaluate scales following the so-called classical
testing theory model.
From the above discussion, one can easily infer a measure or statistics to
describe the reliability of an item or scale. Specifically, we may define an index
of reliability in terms of the proportion of true score variability that is captured
across subjects or respondents, relative to the total observed variability. In
equation form, we can say:
Reliability = 2(true score) /
2(total observed)
Cronbach's Alpha : The proportion of true score variance that is captured by the
items by comparing the sum of item variances with the variance of the sum
scale. Specifically, can be compute: = (k/(k-1)) * [1- (s2i)/s
2sum]
If the sum scale is perfectly reliable, it would expect that the two halves
are perfectly correlated (i.e., r = 1.0). Less than perfect reliability will lead to
less than perfect correlations.
h. Rotation Factor analysis
The factor analysis is another multivariate technique. It is an extremely
powerful and useful analytic approach to psychological, behavioral, financial
and other types of data. It is a statistical technique for determining the
underlying factors or forces among a large number of interdependent variables
of measures. It is a method for extracting common factor variances from a set
of observations. It groups the number of variables of smaller set of uncorrelated
factors potentially conveying a great deal of information.
• Factor: A factor is an underlying dimension that account for several
observed variables. There can be one or more factors, depending upon
the naturel of the study and the number of variables involved in it.
• Factor –loading: Factor-loading are those values which explain how
closely the variables are related to each one of the factors discovered.
They are also known as factors-variable correlations. In fact, factor-
loadings work as key to understanding what the factors mean. It is the
absolute size (rather than the signs, plus or minus) of the loadings that is
important in the interpretation of a factor.
• Communality(h2): Communality, symbolized as h2, shows how much of
each variable is accounted for by the underlying factors taken together.
A high value of communality means that not much of the variable is left
over after whatever the factors represent is taken into consideration. It is
worked out in respect of each variable as under:
H2 of the ith variable= (ith factor loading of factor A)2= (ith factor
loading of factor B)2
• Eigen Value: Eigen value (or Latent Root) is the sum of squared values
of factor loadings relating to a factor. It indicates the relative importance
of each in accounting for the particular set of variables under study.
• Total sum of squares: When Eigen values of all factors are totaled, the
resulting value is called the total of squares. Rotations reveal different
structures in the data. If the factors are independent, orthogonal rotation
is done, and if they are corrected, an oblique rotation is made. Factor
score represents the degree to which each respondent gets high scores on
the group of item that load high on each factor. Factor scores are used in
several other multivariate analyses.
i. Multiple Regressions
Multiple Linear Regression Analysis is a technique for modeling the
linear relationship between two or more variables. It is one of the most widely
used of all statistical methods. In this study five multiple regression modeling
has been applied.
Multiple Regression Modeling has been applied to measure:
v Association between the monthly family income and the
insurance saving allocation
v Policy holders’ level of awareness towards ULIP
v Level of awareness about the operational feature ofULIP
v Policy holders’ level of awareness about changes made in ULIP
operation by IRDA
v Policy holders’ level of awareness on various charges applicable
in ULIP policy operations
The general linear regression model, with normal error terms, simply of
X variables is shown in equation 1.
Yi=β0+ β1Xi1+ β2Xi2+…….+βp-1Xip-1+εi
Where β0, β1,………,βp-1 are parameters, Xi1, Xi2. ………, Xip-1 are known
constants, εi are independent N(0,σ2), i=1, 2, 3, ……. N.
Y= α + β1X1 + β2X2 +β3X3 + β4X4 + β5X5 + β6X6 + β7X7 +β8X8
+β9X9 +…..+ e.
Where, α is constant and β1, β2, β3, β4, β5, …. are coefficients to
estimate, and e is the error term, which the authors assumed as NID for this
research
The entire hypothesis test in this study has been carried out at 5 percent
level of significance. A research student quite often faces measurement
problem, especially when the concepts to be measured are complex and
abstract and there are no standardized measurement tools.