+ All Categories
Home > Education > Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Date post: 22-May-2015
Category:
Upload: dave-appleby
View: 313 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend
Description:
How can we improve achievement at AS level?
Popular Tags:
13
Biddenham Curriculu m Review 2009-10 Contribute to the Biddenham Curriculum Review wiki. You can access this using the following details: http://sites.google.com/site/sites/ system/app/pages/meta/dashboard User name: [email protected] Password: improvement
Transcript
Page 1: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Biddenham Curriculum

Review 2009-10

Contribute to the Biddenham Curriculum Review wiki. You can access this using the following details:http://sites.google.com/site/sites/system/app/pages/meta/dashboardUser name: [email protected]: improvement

Page 2: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

This week’s live issue:

How can we improve

achievement on AS courses?

Page 3: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Do we spoonfeed KS4 students?

• Does this undermine development of the skills needed for AS courses?

• If we made all students study an applied course in KS4 would this:– Teach them skills they need for AS?– Increase spoonfeeding?

• Should we teach PeLTS in year 11?

Page 4: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Dumbed down?

• Have GCSEs have become so easy that intelligent students pass without doing much work & then assume that they can do the same at AS level?

Page 5: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Are we allowing too many weak

students onto AS courses: "setting them up to fail".

• Should we increase the entrance requirements?

• How do we decide what they should be?

• For all subjects or some subjects?

Page 6: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Should we have a trial period for AS

students?• How long should it last?• Should they be allowed to

switch to another subject if they “failed” at the first subject?

• Should they be required top study the Access course instead.

• Would this lead to a super-motivated start to AS?

Page 7: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Should we teach

PeLTS?• In year 11 or at AS?

• Will PeLTS lead to Deep Learning?

• Should we teach PeLTS instead of Critical Thinking or the EPQ?

Page 8: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Should we increase the number of BTEC level 3 courses?

• Are we creating a sheep and goats curriculum?

• Will we spread the number of learners over too many courses pushing some subjects over the cliff of viability?

Why aren’t the goats

doing this?

Page 9: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Should we encourage more students to take the Access

course?

• Would a three year Sixth form be acceptable to many?

• Do we need to change what the Access course offers to achieve this?

• Is this more sheep and goats?

Page 10: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

AS at present: Personalisation

– We offer a wider range of subjects at AS then anyone locally but Sharnbrook.

– We have six option blocks to reduce clashes and maximise choice*.

– We expect all students (except ex Access students) to study 4 AS subjects

*However, this means that period 6 becomes inevitable for some sixth form students.

Page 11: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

AS at present: Inclusion – We have the lowest

entrance requirements for AS courses locally.

– We offer a limited number of level 3 non-AS courses

– We make it very difficult for students to drop an AS subject or to change to another one

Page 12: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

AS at present: Achievement

– We only offer 4⅜ hours teaching per week for each subject as opposed to the national benchmark of 5 hours per week.

– We expect all AS students to study Critical Thinking

– We have a 78% pass rate (A-E) at AS.

Page 13: Biddenham Curriculum Review 2009 10

Contribute, comment, advise, inform:

• Contribute to the Biddenham Curriculum Review wiki. You can access this using the following details:– http://sites.google.com/site/sites/system/app/pages/

meta/dashboard– User name: [email protected]– Password: improvement

• Email [email protected]• Respond on the Sharepoint debate• Put a note in DA’s pigeonhole


Recommended