Date post: | 11-Jan-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | brett-griffith |
View: | 212 times |
Download: | 0 times |
Bill Burns
Vice President & Actuary
CLRS
September 12, 2006
Significant Risk and Uncertaintyin Medical Malpractice Loss Reserving
2
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
General loss reserving guidance provided in several sources ASOP 36
Statement of Principles (1988)
COPLFR (P&C Practice Notes)
3
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
ASOP 36 uses terms such as:
Material Adverse Deviation
Changing Conditions
External Conditions
Significant Risks and Uncertainty
4
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Section 3.3.3 of ASOP 36 addresses the issues of “Significant Risks and Uncertainty” as follows:
“When the actuary reasonably believes that there are significant risks and uncertainties that could result in material adverse deviation the actuary should include an explanatory paragraph in the SAO. The paragraph should contain…a description of the major factors or particular conditions underlying risks and uncertainties that the actuary believes could result in material adverse deviation.”
5
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Statement of Principles says:
Considerations — Understanding the trends and changes affecting the data base is a prerequisite to the application of actuarially sound reserving methods. A knowledge of changes…is essential to the accurate interpretation and evaluation of observed data…
6
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
COPLFR Practice Note says:
“The opining actuary is expected to use his/her discretion as to which risk factors and issues merit discussion in the opinion.”
7
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
COPLFR provides a (partial) list of the types of risk factors (and underlying exposures) for which comments may be appropriate
Asbestos
Construction Defect
Recently Enacted Legislation
Tobacco
Med Mal Legislative Issues
Mold
8
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Question 1
What significant risks and uncertainties – if any – exist in medical malpractice that actuaries might consider disclosing in their SAO’s?
9
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Med Mal factors that have been “considered”: Tort Reforms
Nursing Homes
Breast Implants
Pedicle Screws
Others?
10
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
The field of medicine is changing more rapidly than almost any other:
Delivery
Drugs
Technology
Procedures
11
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Delivery of medicine — then…
Family Doctor
Specialists
Hospitals
12
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
…and now
Primary Care Physicians
Specialists
Hospitals
Outpatient Surgery
Physicians’ Offices
Ambulatory Surgi-Centers (ASC)
13
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Facts about outpatient surgery 70% of all surgery done in U.S.
14 million done in 2005
20% in doctors’ offices
80% in ASC’s
Most ASC’s are accredited (JCAHO, AAAASF)
Most doctors’ offices are not regulated
Many doctors are not board certified in the procedures they perform
14
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Facts about outpatient surgery (cont’d)
Doctors are paid more for office surgery
Medicare pays $600 more for a colonoscopy
Doctors’ offices are the most dangerous place to undergo anesthesia
Outdated/Malfunctioning equipment
Doctors administering anesthesia and operating
Patients are 12x more likely to die or get injured in offices than in hospitals (Archives of Surgery, 2003)
15
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Some facts about (legal) drugs
Thousands of pharmaceutical companies worldwide
“Market” > 4,000 drugs (and rising)
~800,000 doctors in U.S.
> 1.5Bn prescriptions written annually in U.S.
16
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Drugs (cont’d)
Come in all shapes, sizes, colors and dosages
Taken 1x, 2x, 6x daily
Taken in the morning, at night or as needed
Many have similar sounding names but have completely different purposes
Is it any wonder medication errors are one of the leading causes of med mal losses?
17
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Drugs (cont’d)
Hospitals are using new technologies to reduce medication errors but what about those that happen outside the hospital setting?
“Medical Mixologist”
18
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Technologies and Procedures
Two-edged sword
Extend and improve quality of life
Introduce new errors (learning curve)
Warning label: new medical technologies and procedures may be hazardous to your health!
19
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Examples
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (“Lap Choly”)
Minimally invasive
Decreased visibility
Unfamiliar with instruments
More claims, higher awards until doctors were over the learning curve (three years)
20
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Bariatric Surgery
Rapid increase in number of procedures
Number of surgery related mortalities and complications
What is the mortality rate?
Where are doctors in the learning curve?
What would an obesity pandemic mean?
21
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Other factors to think about:
Patient safety
Electronic medical records
Tele-radiology
Use of robots
Evidenced based medicine
New specialties
22
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Question 2
If we agree there are significant risks and uncertainties in medical malpractice should actuaries try to quantify their impact on loss reserves or is an explanatory
paragraph sufficient?
23
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Consider…
Underwriters are expected to constantly use more efficient ways of evaluation and quantifying risk.
Should actuaries be content to say:
“My projections make no provision for the extraordinary future emergence of new classes of losses or types of losses not sufficiently represented in the Company’s historical database or which are not yet quantifiable.”
Or to issue a qualified opinion?
24
September 12, 2006
HC
06_M
edM
al_
091206_W
E B
Conclusion
The numbers do not reveal their secrets easily
“Actuaries need to be curious, sometimes even more than they need to be intelligent…What good is applying a tried-and-true theory if you don’t understand the problem or the underlying drivers involved, or if you’ve misidentified a key risk?” (Sam Gutterman, Contingencies, July/August 06)