+ All Categories

Bioul

Date post: 02-Jun-2018
Category:
Upload: bilal-shahid
View: 213 times
Download: 0 times
Share this document with a friend

of 29

Transcript
  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    1/29

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    2/29

    Bulk growth from the melt : basic

    techniques

    Czochralski (Cz),

    Liquid Encapsulated

    Czochralski (LEC)

    Floating Zone (FZ) Vertical Bridgman

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    3/29

    Czochralski process

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    4/29

    Factors affecting crystal quality

    Cylindrical shape(technological requirement)

    Regularity of the lattice

    (reduction of defects : point defects, dislocations, twins)

    Impurities(oxygen in Si growth)

    Crystal stoichiometry/dopant concentration(reduction of axial and radial segregation)

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    5/29

    Numerical modeling goals

    Better understanding of the factors affectingcrystal quality

    Prediction of : crystal and melt temperature evolution

    solid-liquid interface shape melt flow

    residual stresses

    dopant and impurity concentrations

    defects and dislocations

    Process design improvement

    Process control and optimization

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    6/29

    Principal aspects of the problem

    Coupled, globalinteraction between heat transfer in crystal and

    melt, solidification front deformation and overallradiation transfer

    Non-linear

    physics of radiation, melt convection andsolidification

    Dynamiccritical growth stages: seeding, shouldering, tail- end, crystal detachment, post-growth

    Inversenatural output is prescribed (crystal shape), while

    natural input is calculated (heater power or pull rate)

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    7/29

    Melt convection

    = Significant heat transfer mechanismdefect and dislocation densities

    growth striations

    interface shape

    = Dominant mechanism for dopant and

    impurity transferdopant and impurity (oxygen) distributions

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    8/29

    Typical flow pattern

    Melt convection is due to

    Buoyancy (1)

    Forced convection

    - Coriolis (2)

    - Centrifugal pumping (3)

    Marangoni effect (4)

    Gas flow (5)

    12

    34

    5crystal

    melt

    Ws

    Wccrucible

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    9/29

    Quasi-steady axisymmetric models

    ObjectiveCoupling with quasi-steady and dynamic

    global heat transfer models

    Difficulties

    Structured temporal and azimuthal oscillations

    (3D unsteady effects) + superposed chaotic

    oscillations (turbulence)

    average modeling required

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    10/29

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    11/29

    t0 t1 t2 t3 t4 t5 t6 timet7

    Cone

    growth

    Body

    growth

    Tail-end

    stage

    Quasi-steady simulations

    with melt flow

    Time-

    dependent

    simulation

    with

    interpolated

    flow effect

    Time-dependent

    simulation can provide

    quasi-steady source

    terms equivalent to

    transient terms

    General dynamic strategy

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    12/29

    Melt convection How to modify the flow?

    Large electrical conductivity of semiconductor melts

    Use of magnetic fields to control the flow

    Available magnetic fields

    DC or AC Axisymmetric : vertical or configured

    Transverse (horizontal)

    Rotating

    Difficulties Horizontal fields (3D effects)

    Numerical problems (Hartmann layers)

    2D turbulence (?)

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    13/29

    Rigid magnetic fields

    Ohms law :

    Conservation of charge :

    Rigid magnetic field approximation :induced magnetic field is negligible

    Imposed steady axisymmetric magnetic field :

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    14/29

    Analytical solutionsFrom Hjellming & Walker, 1993

    Existence of a free shear layer:plays an important role in oxygen andimpurity transfer

    Hypotheses :

    High Hartmann number :

    Inertialess approximation (valid if B0.2T) :

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    15/29

    Case I: Case II :

    No magnetic field lines incontact with neither thecrystal nor the crucible

    Magnetic field lines in contactwith both the crystal and thecrucible

    B

    Crystal

    Melt

    Crucible

    B

    Crystal

    Melt

    Crucible

    Free shear layer

    Analytical solution

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    16/29

    Quasi-steady numerical results

    Material and geometrical parameters :

    Silicon crystal diameter : 100 mm

    Crucible diameter : 300 mmMolecular dynamic viscosity : 8.22e-4 kg/m.s

    Process parameters :

    Crystal rotational rate : - 20 rpm (- 2.09 rad/s)

    Crucible rotational rate : + 5 rpm (+ 0.523 rad/s)Pull rate : 1.8 cm/h (5.0e-6 m/s)

    FEMAG Software

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    17/29

    Magnetic field lines

    Bmax=0.03T Bmax=0.7T

    Magnetic field generated by

    2 coils with same radius

    (600 mm)

    Turbulence Model :

    Adapted Mixing Length

    B=0T

    Stokes stream function

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    18/29

    Magnetic field lines

    Magnetic field generated by 2

    coils with different radii

    (600 mm and 75 mm)

    Turbulence model :

    Adapted Mixing Length

    Bmax=0.2T Bmax=0.9T

    Stokes stream function

    B=0T

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    19/29

    Run A

    Opposite crystal and crucible

    rotation senses

    Silicon

    Mixing length model

    m= 8.225 10-4kg/m.s

    Wc= 0.52 s-1

    Ws= -2.O9 s-1

    Vpul= 5. 10-6m/s

    Run B

    Same as A with a vertical

    magnetic field

    B = 0.32 Tesla

    Inverse dynamic simulations of silicon growth

    FEMAG-2 software

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    20/29

    B

    A

    Stream function for runs A and B

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    21/29

    Temperature field for runs A and B

    B

    A

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    22/29

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    23/29

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    24/29

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    25/29

    Off-line Control

    ObjectiveTo determine the best evolution of the processparameters in order to optimize selected process

    variables characterizing crystal shape and quality

    Long-term time scales are considered (instead of

    short-term time scales for on-line control)

    MethodologyDynamic simulations are performed under supervision

    of a controller

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    26/29

    Off-line Control

    Time-dependent

    simulator

    Off-linecontroller

    Doprocess variables

    satisfy the control

    objectives ?

    Startnew time step with

    updated process

    parameters

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    27/29

    Conclusions

    Accurate quasi-steady and dynamic simulation models

    are available using FEMAG-2 software

    Simulations are in agreement with theoretical predictions

    Turbulence modeling must be validated and improved ifnecessary

    Numerical scheme should be able to control mesh

    refinement along boundary and internal layers

    Off-line control is a promising technique for optimizingthe magnetic field design

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    28/29

    k-l turbulence model

    How to modify the flow?

    Additional viscosity :

    Additional conductivity :

    : mean turbulent kinetic energywhere

    Turbulent kinetic energy equation

    : parameters of the model

    : additional Prandtl number

    From Th. Wetzel

  • 8/10/2019 Bioul

    29/29

    Dimensionless parameters

    crucible Reynolds number

    (related to Coriolis force)

    crystal rotation Reynolds number

    (related to centrifugal force)

    Grashoff number

    (related to natural convection)

    Prandtl number

    Hartmann number