Date post: | 05-Mar-2016 |
Category: |
Documents |
Upload: | bisnode-hrvatska |
View: | 226 times |
Download: | 0 times |
THE VIEW FROM ANOTHER CORNER
OFFICIAL INDICATORS
BISNODE INDICATORS
NATIONAL LEAGUES STRENGHT
PLAYERS’ EXPERIENCE
GDP PER CAPITA
POPULATION
CLIMATE CONDITIONS
PLAYERS’ CLIMATEADAPTATION
FIFA
TRANSFERMARKT
World Cup Brasil 2014
Belgium 11.Greece 12.England 13.USA 14.Chile 15.Croatia 16.Côte D’Ivoire 17.Bosnia-Herzegovina 19.France 20.Mexico 21.Russia 22.Ecuador 23.Ghana 24.Algeria 26.Costarica 31.Iran 34.Nigeria 41.Honduras 42.Japan 48.Cameroon 50.Republic of Korea 53.Australia 56.
Spain 1.Germany 2.Argentina 3.Colombia 4.Portugal 5.Uruguay 6.Italy 7.Switzerland 8.Nethrlands 9.Brazil 10.
FIFA rang list
64,1%
35,9%
National Teams value according to Transfermarkt (millions euro)
3. Brazil 467,5
5. Italy 409,0
25,03
17. Chile 148,5
18. Cameroon129,0
20. Ghana102,75
6. France 388,75
12. Uruguay218,5
8. Portugal 321,75
15. Switzerland 178,0
21. Japan98,0
23. Mexico96,0
22. Nigeria96,5
9. Belgium 309,5 16. Côte D’Ivoire160,75
2. Germany 616,0
7. England 334,0
10. Colombia 270,25
11. Netherlands 226,0
4. Argentina 461,0
1. Spain 751,0
14. Russia 184,0
24. Greece91,0
25. Ecuador91,0
31. Australia 28,0
26. USA66,5
13. Croatia 212,25
32. Honduras 21,25
30. Iran 28,5
28. Republic of Korea 52,25
29. Costarica 35,25
27. Algeria 62,75
19. Bosnia- Herzegovina
116,75
The average value of a Spain’s National Team player (EUR 25.3 milion), is higher than the value of the whole Honduras National Team (EUR 21.25 million).
According to Transfermarkt, the most valuable team of the World Soccer Championship is Spain with 751 million EUR. Germany follows with 616 million EUR. Brazil is the third, with the National Team value of EUR 467.5 million. Regarding the population, the most valuable National Teams of the World Championship are Uruguay, Croatia and Bosnia and Herzegovina. More specifically, the Uruguay National Team is worth EUR 218.5, considering that Uruguay has only 3.3 million inhabitants.
Côt
e D
’Ivoi
re
Nig
eria
Hon
dura
s
Bos
nia-
Her
zeg.
Col
ombi
a
Bra
zil
Mex
ico
Rus
sia
Arg
entin
a
Gre
ece
Italy
R. o
f Kor
ea
Japa
n
Eng
land
Net
herla
nds
Sw
itzer
land
US
A
Aus
tral
ia
Ger
man
y
Bel
gium
Fran
ce
Spa
in
Por
tuga
l
Chi
le
Hrv
atsk
a
Uru
guay
Cos
taric
a
Iran
Ecu
ador
Alg
eria
Gha
na
Cam
eroo
n
1,85billioninhabitants of the Earth shall be part of this year’s Soccer Mania
Average GDP of participating countries is
The difference between the most populated country participating in the World Championship (USA) and the participating country with the smallest population (Uruguay) is an incredible 96.4 times.
GDP per capita
$ 22.59062,5% of participating countries are below average
The no. of inhabitants of the countries participating in the World Championship ( the number of inhabitants in millions)
2. Brazil 201,0
10. Italy 59,9
21. Chile 17,8
19. Cameroon17. Ghana
6. France 66,6
32. Uruguay
3,3
22,524,2
22,4
26. Portugal
28. Švicarska
8,0
5. Japan 126,76. Mexico 118,4
3. Nigerija 174,5
24. Belgium
11,1
20. Côte D’Ivoire
7. Germany 80,311. England
53,0
13. Colombia 47,7
22. Nizozemska
16,8
15. Argentina 41,7
14. Spain 46,7
4. Russia 143,7
25. Greece
23. Ecuador
18. Australia
1. USA 318,1
North America
South America
AfricaAsia
Europe
436,5
339,6
282,3 254.1
376,2
30. Croatia
27. Honduras 8,3
4,6
15,2
8. Iran 77,2
12. Republic of Korea
50,2
29. Costarica
16. Algeria 38,7
31. Bosnia-Herzegovina3,94,3
10,8
10,5
23,5
If we look at the GDP per capita of the countries participating in the World Championship, USA is again at the top. Cameroon, Ivory Coast, Ghana and Nigeria are at the bottom. With respect to significant differences in the participating countries’ GDP per capita, the average GDP is 22.590.
GERMANYCROATIA
USA 5598 km
Croatia 5523 km
Cameroon 4697 km
Uruguay 4692 km
Portugal 4537 km
Brazil 3684 km
Switzerland 3665 km
France 3512 km
Bosnia-Herzegovina 3490 km
Honduras 3280 km
England 3179
Netherlands 3155 km
Italy 3086 km
Nigeria 2981 kmCôte D’Ivoire 2971 km
Japan 2777 kmR. of Korea 2531 km km
Costarica 2268 kmGreece 2266 km
Russia 2250 km
Australia 2225 km
Chile 1932 km
Algeria 1887 km
Spain 1884 km
Iran 1784 km
Ecuador 1756 km
Ghana 1749 km
Argentina 1680 km
Germ
any 1657 km
Colom
bia 1497 km
Mexico 1064 km
Belgium
696 km
Travelling distance of National Teams for games, per Group
Is the average distance that will pass each national team during first gruop phase of competition
During the first round of the World Championship, the National Teams will travel
USA will travel the most, 5598 kilometres, while Belgium will travel the least, only 696 km. The second-longest travelling distance will be covered by Croatia, who will travel for 5523 kilometres.
2.811 km
Manaus
Cuiaba
Brasilia
Sao Paulo
Salvador
Recife
Natal
Fortaleza
Belo Horizonte
Rio de Janeiro
Cuturiba
Porto Alegre
B RA
ZI
L
89.953 kilometres distance
Brazil is 97 times larger than Croatia and almost 24 times larger than Germany. During the first round, Croatia will travel the distance equivalent to 26 journeys between Zagreb and Osijek.
BRAZIL0
5
10
15
20
25
30
CR
OATIA
MEXICO
CA
MER
OON
SPAIN0
5
10
15
20
25
30
NETH
ERLANDSCHILE
AU
STR
ALIA
Brazil Croatia Mexico Cameroon
Value of the team 3 13 23 18
Fifa rang list 3 16 20 30
No. of inhabitants 2 30 6 19
GDP per capita 22 17 20 31
Comparasion of countries in each group by four indicators
A
Value of the team
RANK
Fifa rang list
Number of inhabitants
GDP per capita
05
10
15
20
25
30
A great difference may be observed between Brazil and Mexico on one hand, and Cameroon and Croatia on the other, with respect to the number of their inhabitants. Also, we can clearly see in this Graph that Brazil is the Group’s favourite, while Croatia and Mexico are the most probable runner-up candidates in the Group. Bisnode analysis gives an advantage to Croatia.
Brazil dominant
Sport brand
Spain Netherlands Chile Australia
Value of the team 1 11 17 31
Fifa rang list 3 16 20 30
No. of inhabitants 14 22 21 18
GDP per capita 11 4 15 3
BAll participants of this Group are in the higher half of the GDP per capita. The leading team is certainly Spain, while the Netherlands follow it very closely.
The richest Group on the Mondial, in GDP per capita
Sport brand
Comparasion of countries in each group by four indicators
COLOMBIA0
5
10
15
20
25
30
GR
EECE
CÔTE D’IVOIR
E
JAPA
N
Colombia Greece C. D’Ivoire Japan
Value of the team 10 24 16 21
Fifa rang list 4 12 17 29
No. of inhabitants 13 25 20 5
GDP per capita 24 14 32 8
Uruguay Costarica England Italy
Vrijednost momčadi 12 29 7 5
FIFA rang lista 6 25 13 7
Broj stanovnika 32 29 11 10
BDP per capita 19 21 6 12
URUGUAY
CO
STARICA
ENGLAND
ITAL
Y
C DThe most valuable team of this Group is Columbia, while Japan is the richest and the most highly populated country. The proof that such factors are not of utmost importance in soccer is Ivory Coast, the poorest of all countries in the Championship, which will, as the second team in its Group, pass to the second round in the Championship.
Costa Rica is certainly an outsider in this Group, everyone else counting on earning points with it readily. However, it is questionable how games between Italy, England and Uruguay will end. Bisnode analysis gives a slight advantage to European National Teams. More so because the biggest star of Uruguay, Suarez, has been injured.
The Ivory Coast is the poorest country on the Championship passing into the second round
Uruguay between the two giants
Sport brand Nacionalni dres, proizvođač
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Argentina Bosnia-Her. Iran Nigeria
Value of the team 4 19 30 22
Fifa rang list 3 18 26 27
No. of inhabitants 15 31 8 3
GDP per capita 16 26 23 30
Switzerland Ecuador France Honduras
Value of the team 15 25 6 32
Fifa rang list 8 22 19 28
No. of inhabitants 28 23 9 27
GDP per capita 2 25 9 28
ARGENTINA
BO
SN
IA-H
ERZEGOVINAIRAN
NIG
ERIA
Comparasion of countries in each group by four indicators
ESurely one of the easiest Groups, where it is clear that Honduras and Ecuador – by no indicator – have much of a chance for the second round.
A gap between the rich and the poor
Sport brand
FArgentina is the doubtless favourite of this Group. However, the things get complicated for the second place. The Bisnode analysis gives a slight advantage to our neighbours - Bosnia and Herzegovina with respect to Nigeria. Iran may spoil the odds in this group, although the changes of its passing into the second round are minimum.
Argentina and Bosnia and Herzegovina continue the championship
Sport brand
SWITZERLAND
ECU
ADOR
FRANCE
HO
ND
URAS
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Value of the team
RANK
Fifa rang list
Number of inhabitants
GDP per capita
05
10
15
20
25
30
GERMANY
PO
RTUGAL
GHANA
USA
BELGIUM
ALG
ERIA
RUSSIA
RE
PU
BLI
C O
F KOREA
Germany Portugal Ghana USA
Value of the team 2 8 20 26
Fifa rang list 2 5 23 14
No. of inhabitants 7 26 17 1
GDP per capita 5 13 29 1
Belgium Algeria Russia R. of Korea
Value of the team 9 27 14 28
Fifa rang list 11 24 21 31
No. of inhabitants 24 16 4 12
GDP per capita 7 27 18 10
GIn spite of the fact that USA GDP per capita and its number of inhabitants is the highest, the two European National teams (Germany and Portugal) will go further in the championship. Ghana is a hidden peril for all of this Group’s teams, as it can surprise and make he fight for the second place significantly more complicated
Clash between rich and poor
Sport brand
Comparasion of countries in each group by four indicators
HAccording to the Bisnode analysis, Belgium shall pass to the second round (as the first in the Group) as well as Russia, Algeria and Southern Korea, who are all the weakest national teams in this year’s World Championship.
Belgium is the Group’s favourite
Sport brand
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Value of the team
RANK
Fifa rang list
Number of inhabitants
GDP per capita
05
10
15
20
25
30
Sport brand analysis
Three largest world sports equipment manufacturers are dominant - Nike, Puma and Adidas, who equip 84% of the Championship, i.e. 27 National Teams.
Adidas and Nike will meet in the finals. >
109832
1 1 1 1 1
1. Spain Spain 1.
2. England Brazil 2.
3. Germany Germany 3.
4. Belgium Argentina 4.
5. France Belgium 5.
6. Italy Italy 6.
7. Argentina England 7.
8. Brazil Portugal 8.
9. Portugal France 9.
10. Switzerland Colombia 10.
11. Algeria Uruguay 11.
12. Uruguay Switzerland 12.
13. Croatia Netherlands 13.
14. Cameroon Croatia 14.
15. C. D’Ivoire Chile 15.
16. Chile C. D’Ivoire 16.
17. Colombia Bosnia -Herz. 17.
18. Japan Russia 18.
19. Bosnia-Herz. Algeria 19.
20. Netherlands Ghana 20.
21. R. of Korea Cameroon 21.
22. Nigeria Greece 22.
23. Ghana Mexico 23.
24. Greece Japan 24.
25. USA Nigeria 25.
26. Mexico USA 26.
27. Australia Ecuador 27.
28. Honduras R. of Korea 28.
29. Russia Iran 29.
30. Iran Costarica 30.
31. Ecuador Australia 31.
32. Costarica Honduras 32.
Bisnode rank list
Brazil Spain Colombia Italy France Argentina Germany Belgium
Croatia Netherland Cote D’Ivoire England Switzerland Bosnia-Herz. Portugal Russia
Cameroon Chile Greece Uruguay Ecuador Nigeria Ghana Algeria
Mexico Australia Japan Costarica Honduras Iran USA R. of Korea
A B C D E F G H
Germ
any
Germ
any
Russia
Spai
n
Spai
n
Spain
Croa
tia
Italy
Italy
England
Bosnia-Herz.
GermanyBra
zil
Colombia France
France
Net
herla
nds
England
Braz
il
Bra
zil
Brazil
Spain
Cote D’IvoireArgentina
Argentina
Argentina
Switzerland
Belgium
Portugal
Portugal
Based on the Bisnode Ranking List, a scenario of this year’s World Championship in Brazil has been created
Bisnode calculation of the National Team Values The National Team ranking list, based on the National League strength where the National Team players play. The leading world’s Leagues are Spain, England, Germany, Italy, Portugal, France and Russia, according to the official FIFA ranking list of the National Leagues. As most Spain’s national team players play in their home League, which is at the same time the strongest, Spain is according to this criterion the leading Team. Although the Croatian League is weak, since most of our National Team players play in strong foreign leagues, Croatian National Team is in the upper part and takes the 13th place.
Bisnode rang lista svjetskog prvenstvaCombined calculation: the strengths of the National Teams to the strengths of the National Leagues where the National Team players play, the FIFA ranking list of the national team players’ value according to Transfermarkt, the travelling distance of the National Teams in the first round and numerous other analytic parameters have been used in the Ultimate World Bisnode Ranking List of the National Soccer Teams.
1/8 1/4 1/2 finals
In final wins Adidas.
www.bisnode.hr
facebook.com/BisnodeHrvatska